--- In hegel-logic@yahoogroups.com, "bakhshalthalho" <bakhshalthalho@...> wrote:
>
> --- In hegel-logic@yahoogroups.com, "nmktait" <nmktait@> wrote:
> >
> > Hopefully, someone can help me out with this one...
> >
> > I'm writing a paper defending Hegel's determinate negation. My question is
whether Hegel allows for unique results (or consequences). What I mean, is that
when a new theory develops from the contradictions found in the older theory, is
it possible that the new theory is only partially determined?
> >
> though i have not been acadamic student of philosophy but i think that i can
share my view on this. i think that it is not question of partial
determination.for any being acquiring,. any determinacy is infact a process. it
is not necesory always that any new theory is development of previeous one.2nd
thing every determinacy is not end in itself , rather it paves the way for an
other one ,therefore any new theory if dialectically negets previveious one
becomes both i mean relevent and absolute.
>


This is my guess that because of co-existential envelope of being and self-dual
of being, (please read this from a conceptual framework) the uniqueness is
determined up to a (for lack of a better word) a diffeormophism, some measure of
imposed open set type is allowed. If you find this not close, I can think of
other examples.

Hope this helps

Alireza