Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
gulflink · Gulf War, OIF, medical issues & programs
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want your group to be featured on the Yahoo! Groups website? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Response from VA to Whitehouse - Gulf War Registry - Centcom medic   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #8585 of 11579 |
Dear Readers
 
Once again Susan Mathers did not feel the need to address my
questions, but rather skirt the obvious in favor of a vague
description of how VA is dealing with OIF as well as the Gulf War
Registry. It isn't quite as bad as the first response, but it doesn't
answer how this is going to be resolved or why we aren't being
asked to participate at VA to rebuild this program.
 
Below is letter two that I also gave a copy to Shays staff on June
28th when I was with the AVIP delegation on Capital Hill. So I will
give a copy of this response letter to them tomorrow to give them
a idea of how VA / DOD is interacting with veterans on this.
( Response dated July 8th 2005 )
 
                                                        Sincerely
                                                        Kirt P. Love
                                                        Director, DSBR
 
 

----- Original Message -----
From: Kirt Love
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 12:07 AM
Subject: Whitehouse - Gulf War Registry - 69,875 Centcom medical survey

Dear Mr. President
 
My name is Kirt Love, of the Desert Storm Battle Registry.
 
On May 13th 2005 I had written to you of my concerns with the Veteran Affairs Gulf War Registry program.
Of which Marguerite A. Murer wrote to me in your stead on May 16th 2005 that the Whitehouse would forward my message to Veteran Affairs for a response. On June 10th 2005 Susan A. Mathers at Veteran Affairs responded to the May 13th letter. 

 

The response letter back was vague, and certainly made no attempt to answer my questions in such a way to assure me that this would be sincerely looked into. 

 

Dr. Mathers made light that 90,000 Gulf War veterans that had participated in the Gulf War Registry would not agree with my assessment of inaccessibility. If you remember I had commented on how difficult it is now to get into the Gulf War Registry program. That once you walk into a VAMC, the lobbies do not promote the Gulf War Registry program. 

 

Let me explain:

 

696,470 Gulf War veterans are listed as Gulf War 1990-1991 combat era. In 1992 the Persian Gulf Registry program made its start, until it was revised in 1996. During that 4 year period more than 49,079 veterans participated in the first registry.

At about 12,269 Gulf War Registry exams a year.

 

From 1996 to1999 was the revised Persian Gulf Registry, of which 21,306 participated up to September 1999.

At about 7,102 Gulf War Registry exams a year.

 

While at the same time 32,876 where part of the military Clinical Comprehensive Evaluation Program. So we have 70,385 Gulf War Registry exams, and 32,876 CCEP to produce 100,339 total Gulf War veteran examinations.

 

In January 2003 the Gulf War Review published by VA reported 85,048 Gulf War Registry exams. Which means 14,663 exams had been done in the 4 years from 1999 to 2003.

At about 3,666 Gulf War Registry exams a year.

 

As of June 10 2005 Susan Mathers rounded the number to 90,000 Gulf War Registry exams. Which would mean 4,952 exams from 2003 to 2005.

At about 2,476 Gulf War Registry exams a year.

 

The problem here is that Operation Iraqi Freedom troops are returning home since 2003, and under VA protocols they are supposed to be examined under the same program, as Gulf War Registry exams. So how is it with 100,000 additional troops added to this equation the numbers are going down instead of up when war casualties have been pouring home from Iraq. Only 12% of the original Gulf War veterans returning have been in for a Gulf War Registry exam but 246,150 ( 35% ) have claims filed from the 1990-1991 conflict.  (claim numbers - GWVIS report  February 2005 ).

 

On another note, Deployment Health Support Directorate has been sitting of a document from the Gulf War that is medically relevant. I wrote DHSD on April 16th 2004 to ask them to release the “Centcom Medical Surveillance, 16-22 December 1990 Survey of 69,875 Personnel Participating in Desert Shield”. This should have been declassified during the 1995 Gulf War Declassification project, in which the Security Review Protocols for this specified that medical buzz words would justify declassification. DHSD would not make this available, and I forwarded the request to Department of Defense Inspector General. It was given case number 92329, which was forwarded the Health Affairs for action in 2004. Nothing.

 

I made the request again a year later on April 26th 2005. Then once again to Mike Kilpatrick himself at the IOM Infectious Disease meeting May 26th 2005 in front of a witness. Then again on June 21st 2005 when I walked into DHSD at 5113 Skyline Plaza. Still nothing. No call backs, or anything.

 

The National Archives gave me an official response on June 10th, 2005 that it would not be declassifying any of the Gulf War 518 Centcom records group for the next 10 years.

This Centcom survey is a disease case report of 69,875 troops in Iraq from the 1990-1991 Gulf War. It could have medical relevance in current Gulf War medical research. There isn’t a justified reason why 15 years later this material should not be made available to medical researchers.

 

Mr. President, this is two of many unanswered questions that VA / DOD have chosen to gloss over, which leaves the question why? Both obstacles hinder current Gulf War programs, and medical research. As long as Gulf War Veterans are not welcome to participate at VA / DOD Gulf War functions, we are being ignored to death looking for answers to our problems from the first Gulf War. 

 

Apparently just forwarding my message to them is not enough, would you please inquire into these 2 problems in some official capacity Mr. President.

 

 

                                                Sincerely 

                                                Kirt P. Love

                                                Director, DSBR

 

Desert Storm Battle Registry

P.O. Box 177

Mount Jackson, VA 22842

540-477-2923

http://www.gulflink.org


Mon Jul 18, 2005 7:36 pm

gulfwarmonger
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #8585 of 11579 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Dear Readers Once again Susan Mathers did not feel the need to address my questions, but rather skirt the obvious in favor of a vague description of how VA is...
Kirt Love
gulfwarmonger
Offline Send Email
Jul 18, 2005
7:36 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help