I noticed while looking at the online SBL program book yesterday that AnneMarie Luijendijk's paper on the Gospel of Jesus' Wife, "Was Jesus Married? A New...
Thanks, Stephen. Your timing is superb. I had intended to write a note to the list this morning copying your timeline and announcing an update of my GJW page....
2nd century claimed date of Greek "gospel" 2nd-4th c. claimed date of a claimed Coptic Gospel of John ms 4th century claimed date of ms 1945 Nag Hammadi mss...
... Yes, it's clear from King's HTR article that she and the others had not realized the full extent of the borrowing from Coptic Thomas. This is not criticism...
Hi Ian, I agree that there has been little engagement with the evidence on either side. The essays of Peppard and Paananen are outdated, since they were ...
Quoting Mike "But what is your position? That it might have been a forgery from the 80's? OK, then we need to weigh the likelihood that the forger accidentally...
... "Almost certainly?" Nah. What's interesting to me that this is the very position that I took back on Sept 26th, before the two pieces of evidence of...
Hi Ian Just to clarify my position. If the handwriting on the note closely resembles the known handwriting of say Professor Munro then I agree I was being too...
Jack, I think you've misunderstood my point, and I apologize if I wasn't being clear. I don't think (nor do most people, I think it is safe to say) that GJW...
... Yes, dependence on the interlinear and whether the fragment existed in the early 80s are inconsistent. (At least) one of them has to be wrong. If the...
... Yes, but whether it was in fact in existence at that time is questionable. The sole piece of evidence appears to be the handwritten, unsigned, and undated...
... From: Ian Brown To: gthomas@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2012 4:07 PM Subject: Re: [GTh] Bernhard's New Essay on GJW Correct me if I'm wrong,...
From: Ian Brown Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2012 10:07 AM To: gthomas@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [GTh] Bernhard's New Essay on GJW Correct me if I'm wrong, or...
Correct me if I'm wrong, or if some new evidence has arisen, but isn't dependence on your interlinear, Mike, impossible given the fragment was in circulation...
To: GThos In Response To: Stephen Carlson On: The Term Gnostic From: Bruce Stephen: , I have become uncomfortable with the use and helpfulness of the word ...
... Thanks for your response. The trouble with objecting to "gnostic" as a broad cover term embracing diverse thinkings that all get lumped together is that by...
... There's actually four questions in L6A, and the "answer" provided in L6B ("don't do what you hate") is suspiciously not preceded by the indirect object 'to...
To: GThos On: Three Things From: Bruce Mike Grondin (quoting Mark Goodacre): "The incident [in L13] remains intriguing because of the forbidden 'three words'...
... Hi, Bob. With the work of Karen King and Michael Williams, I have become uncomfortable with the use and helpfulness of the word "gnostic" as a broad cover...
Hi Stephen, I also find the complaint about Mark's chapter 10 hard to fathom. One of the many passages in it that I found interesting was this: "The incident...
To: GThomas On: Kloppenborg's Q Stratification From: Bruce Perhaps, having looked into "The Formation of Q" with indifferent result, I might reply to my own...
To: GThos On: Kloppenborg's G1-3 From: Bruce Thanks to all three respondents for their help with identifying the Kloppenborg layers. On cross-checking (Ian...
... Maybe it depends on what you mean by "helpful," but I don't have a problem with an author's teasing out the implications of what he established in earlier...
PS: Great idea on the book page, though, Mike. Thanks for putting that together. Cheers, Mark ... -- Mark Goodacre Duke University Department of Religion ...
The Bart Ehrman Youtube link looks like a pirate to me. It's uploaded apparently without permission by someone called "Wisdom of the Aeons". These videos are...
