I am a descandent of this Lemuel Summerell. 

Lemuel Summerell was born January 1814 in NC, and died Bef. 1910 in Pitt Co,
NC.  He married Mary Melvina Witherington abt. 1849, daughter of Silas
Witherington and Susan Smith.  She was born abt. 1830 in Pitt Co, NC, and died
Bef 1900 in Pitt Co, NC.  I  have alot of stuff on this family.  My
Grandmother on my Mom's side was was Claire Summerell who married

Erenest Franks.

I go back as far as Thomas Summerell was born Bef 1755 and died Bef 1830 in
Lenoir Co, NC.  He married Unknown.  She was born Bef 1765 and Aft 1820.



-- Original Message -----
From: "William Kittrell" <wbk99@...>
To: genpcncfir@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, December 20, 2010 3:00:44 PM
Subject: [genpcncfir] Lemuel Sumerell

 




Does anyone have information on the parents of Lemuel Sumerell
b. ca 1825. He married Mary Melvina Witherington, b. 1827.
d/o Silas Witherington.

I have been helping someone on this family and have about 17 pages
of information. But I need info on Lemuel's parents.

Lemuel had a son
James E. b. 1865
and he had a son
Jesse James b. 1895

I have list of children for James E. Sumerell and Jesse James Sumerell

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Bill,
I have Lemuel Sumerell on my database, but not his parents.
 
As he's not a direct ancestor, I haven't done much research on him. 
However, I have several aliases for his surname:

Summerell
Sumerell (on 1850 Census)
Sumersell (on 1880 Census) 
Sumrell (in article "Death of Lam Sumrell D.R. 15 July 1904")
 
I have an indicator that he may have used Samuel, 
but it may be a misinterpretation of a script "L" v/s "S"
 
I found this in the old notes: /it's an email you sent on June 30, 2008.
Marcia
 
----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Bill Kittrell"
>> Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 6:01 AM
>> Subject: [NC-PCFR] Lemuel Summerell
>>
>>
>>>I went back and read Dorothy Sumrell's notes. The way they
>>> were aligned I missed the connections. Lemuel was off by
>>> himself so I did not realize he had brothers and sisters on
>>> the same page. Here is what she has for this family.
>>>
>>> SOURCE: Dorothy Moye Sumrell (She lists Stewart's
>>> children, but also some of the grandchildren.)
>>> Descendants of
>>> Stewart Sumrele b. ____ (served in Greene County Militia
>>> War of 1812
>>> m.
>>> Lensey or Laney ______
>>> Children:
>>> a. Chloe b. ca 1808 m. Asa Martin Listed with Rebecca,
>>> her sister on 1860 Lenoir Co. Census
>>> b. Graves Sumerell b. ca 1812
>>> c. Burton Franklin Summerell b. Nov 16, 1816
>>> m. Martha Ann Smith (Martha m. 2nd Franklin Bell)
>>> d. Rebecca Summerell b. ca 1816 Living with
>>> Graves Summerell on 1850 Pitt Census. Living
>>> with Asa Martin and Chloe on 1860 Lenoir Co. Census
>>> e. Grizzy Summerell b. ca 1823 m. Kenon Oxley Living
>>> with Graves Summerell on Pitt 1850 Census, with
>>> husband Kenon on 1860 Lenoir Census
>>> f. Nona Summerell b. ca 1826 Living with Graves
>>> Summerell on 1850 Pitt Census, living with Kenon
>>> Oxley and Grizzy on 1860 Lenoir Census.
>>> g. Lemuel Summerell b. ca 1827 m. Melvina Witherington.




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Merry Christmas to all!
 
A question for the Group.
Slightly off topic ...
 
I don't do genealogy as much as before, mostly because of a high level of
frustration that I have with my new laptop and the 2010 version of FTM.
 
History: I tripped over my laptop's wire, pulling it off of the table. [No data
loss,
I had a backup.] My son generously purchased & sent me a new laptop that
he thought would be very good processor. It would have worked good with my
2005 FTM program, but it's Vista operating system required I upgrade and I
purchased the Family Tree Maker 2010. 




My 1st ISSUE is the way the FTM2010 processes its database, which is quite 
different than my old version did. I think it brings the entire database
into RAM
for some of its processes - like building an index or merging two individuals -
making very large files very cumbersome. (IE my 80,000 database file takes 5
long hours to open and build its an index.) NOT FUN!!!
 
On top of that, the laptop [has a single core] goes to 100% usage during these
processes. To solve this, I selected only direct ancestors, reducing my file to
8,000 (10%) and reducing the processing time is a mere 30 minutes.
Still NOT FUN!  And now, I have two copies of some people!




My 2nd ISSUE is that FTM2010 made other signifant improvements, which has
taken me months and months to edit my smaller databases to correct. I've started
converting the 8,000 file, but the 80,000 one is an overwhelming task still
looming.
 
One such task is straightening my address field data, which changed from one
line to two lines. The first line is City/State/Country, which is verified by
FTM.
The second line holds local addresses, as well as, comments [like "WWII action"]
which I have used extensively.
 
Now, don't get me wrong, the end result looks like it will be much better
product than before. Especially in finding specific references quickly. 



My 3rd ISSUE is how frequently FTM stops running as a task on my desktop
(but is still running on the computer using 91% CPU). I must wait till it ends
before restarting FTM. I have no idea whether this is a computer issue or a
application issue. 
________________________________________________




I don't know if any of you have faced these issues. If you have, how have you
overcomed them? Or perhaps like me, you've been sucking it up.
 
Here's the Question  - - - -
Will a dual core [or larger] machine solve my processing issues? OR
Assuming there's no hope for this version of FTM,

I should buy FTM2011, which fixes the CPU usage and crashing problems? OR
There's no hope any of these FTMs, I should buy a different program. OR
I should do both or something else ...
 
Waiting to hear from you - Merry Christmas, Marcia




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Marcia,



Your problem with FTM make me very glad I swiched to Legacy.  I feel it is
much more user friendly.



Jean W.

   _____

From: genpcncfir@yahoogroups.com [mailto:genpcncfir@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of Marcia McLawhorn
Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2010 3:54 PM
To: genpcncfir@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [genpcncfir] Merry Christmas





Merry Christmas to all!

A question for the Group.
Slightly off topic ...

I don't do genealogy as much as before, mostly because of a high level of
frustration that I have with my new laptop and the 2010 version of FTM.

History: I tripped over my laptop's wire, pulling it off of the table. [No
data loss,
I had a backup.] My son generously purchased & sent me a new laptop that
he thought would be very good processor. It would have worked good with my
2005 FTM program, but it's Vista operating system required I upgrade and I
purchased the Family Tree Maker 2010.

My 1st ISSUE is the way the FTM2010 processes its database, which is quite
different than my old version did. I think it brings the entire database
into RAM
for some of its processes - like building an index or merging two
individuals -
making very large files very cumbersome. (IE my 80,000 database file takes 5

long hours to open and build its an index.) NOT FUN!!!

On top of that, the laptop [has a single core] goes to 100% usage during
these
processes. To solve this, I selected only direct ancestors, reducing my file
to
8,000 (10%) and reducing the processing time is a mere 30 minutes.
Still NOT FUN!  And now, I have two copies of some people!

My 2nd ISSUE is that FTM2010 made other signifant improvements, which has
taken me months and months to edit my smaller databases to correct. I've
started
converting the 8,000 file, but the 80,000 one is an overwhelming task still
looming.

One such task is straightening my address field data, which changed from one

line to two lines. The first line is City/State/Country, which is verified
by FTM.
The second line holds local addresses, as well as, comments [like "WWII
action"]
which I have used extensively.

Now, don't get me wrong, the end result looks like it will be much better
product than before. Especially in finding specific references quickly.

My 3rd ISSUE is how frequently FTM stops running as a task on my desktop
(but is still running on the computer using 91% CPU). I must wait till it
ends
before restarting FTM. I have no idea whether this is a computer issue or a
application issue.
________________________________________________

I don't know if any of you have faced these issues. If you have, how have
you
overcomed them? Or perhaps like me, you've been sucking it up.

Here's the Question  - - - -
Will a dual core [or larger] machine solve my processing issues? OR
Assuming there's no hope for this version of FTM,

I should buy FTM2011, which fixes the CPU usage and crashing problems? OR
There's no hope any of these FTMs, I should buy a different program. OR
I should do both or something else ...

Waiting to hear from you - Merry Christmas, Marcia

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

How much memory do you have on your computer? Sounds like you don't have enough.
These days to work smoothly you need at least 4 gig memory, 6 is even better.
Faye Hays

   ----- Original Message -----
   From: jow
   To: genpcncfir@yahoogroups.com
   Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2010 4:27 PM
   Subject: RE: [genpcncfir] Merry Christmas





   Marcia,

   Your problem with FTM make me very glad I swiched to Legacy. I feel it is
   much more user friendly.

   Jean W.

   _____

   From: genpcncfir@yahoogroups.com [mailto:genpcncfir@yahoogroups.com] On
   Behalf Of Marcia McLawhorn
   Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2010 3:54 PM
   To: genpcncfir@yahoogroups.com
   Subject: [genpcncfir] Merry Christmas

   Merry Christmas to all!

   A question for the Group.
   Slightly off topic ...

   I don't do genealogy as much as before, mostly because of a high level of
   frustration that I have with my new laptop and the 2010 version of FTM.

   History: I tripped over my laptop's wire, pulling it off of the table. [No
   data loss,
   I had a backup.] My son generously purchased & sent me a new laptop that
   he thought would be very good processor. It would have worked good with my
   2005 FTM program, but it's Vista operating system required I upgrade and I
   purchased the Family Tree Maker 2010.

   My 1st ISSUE is the way the FTM2010 processes its database, which is quite
   different than my old version did. I think it brings the entire database
   into RAM
   for some of its processes - like building an index or merging two
   individuals -
   making very large files very cumbersome. (IE my 80,000 database file takes 5

   long hours to open and build its an index.) NOT FUN!!!

   On top of that, the laptop [has a single core] goes to 100% usage during
   these
   processes. To solve this, I selected only direct ancestors, reducing my file
   to
   8,000 (10%) and reducing the processing time is a mere 30 minutes.
   Still NOT FUN! And now, I have two copies of some people!

   My 2nd ISSUE is that FTM2010 made other signifant improvements, which has
   taken me months and months to edit my smaller databases to correct. I've
   started
   converting the 8,000 file, but the 80,000 one is an overwhelming task still
   looming.

   One such task is straightening my address field data, which changed from one

   line to two lines. The first line is City/State/Country, which is verified
   by FTM.
   The second line holds local addresses, as well as, comments [like "WWII
   action"]
   which I have used extensively.

   Now, don't get me wrong, the end result looks like it will be much better
   product than before. Especially in finding specific references quickly.

   My 3rd ISSUE is how frequently FTM stops running as a task on my desktop
   (but is still running on the computer using 91% CPU). I must wait till it
   ends
   before restarting FTM. I have no idea whether this is a computer issue or a
   application issue.
   ________________________________________________

   I don't know if any of you have faced these issues. If you have, how have
   you
   overcomed them? Or perhaps like me, you've been sucking it up.

   Here's the Question - - - -
   Will a dual core [or larger] machine solve my processing issues? OR
   Assuming there's no hope for this version of FTM,

   I should buy FTM2011, which fixes the CPU usage and crashing problems? OR
   There's no hope any of these FTMs, I should buy a different program. OR
   I should do both or something else ...

   Waiting to hear from you - Merry Christmas, Marcia

   [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

   [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

On your computer, go to
start
control panel
system and maintenance
choose system
it will tell you how much memory (RAM) you have on your computer.
I have 4 on my laptop, but had 6 on the desktop that I gave to grandson for
games.
It takes about 2 gig ram just to run windows, so if you don't have more than
that, you have nothing  left to run other programs after you boot up to windows.
You can take it to Best Buy and they will install if for you right there if you
don't have anyone else to do it for you.
It is a simple pull out the chip and push the new ones in. If nothing is wrong
with your computer, it will do all the necessary work itself of picking up the
new memory chips.
If this is not your problem, sorry, but that sure is what it sounds like.
Best Buy employs intelligent "kids" who are taught to push sales, so don't let
them sell you anything else.
If the repair is half or nearly half the cost of a new computer, you're better
off going with a new computer. Computers are cheaper than they have "ever" been,
but unless you know you're getting a deal, I'd wait until after Christmas to buy
a new computer. Wait for the sales.
My son just bought a new quad core but I am still using very nicely a dual core,
but next one I buy will be a quad core. It is faster.
Just wait for the sales.
Faye Hays



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

One more thing I need to tell you to look for.
Is it a celeron computer?
WalMart sold some laptops on Black Friday for $198 which sounded good! I was
almost tempted to go early (never again) until I read the fine print that it was
a celeron.
A celeron is like a tricycle next to a bicycle. The new computers are like
motorcycles to a bicycle. A celeron is limited and no amount of money spent on
it will give you the speed you needto get some programs to work. It is basically
a word processor and the old FTM programs. And the newer word processors have
some problems with celerons too.
I do photo restoration and tried some photos on one and I was really
frustrated....it would take forever to do anything.
If you have a celeron and it works with the programs you are running, no
problem. I wouldn't worry about anything. As long as it does the job, it is
good.
Faye Hays


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Marcia, I gave up on FTM when the 2009 version came out and, while "converting"
my database to the new format, trashed much of the data. In addition, it dropped
many of the features which I enjoyed, such as being able to access the FTM data
disks from within the program. It appeared to be a "stripped down" version of
FTM, intended for people who were just beginning in genealogy, rather than those
of use who had been using FTM for years. Not exactly rewarding to previously
loyal customers!

I've gone with The Master Genealogist, which, while it has a fairly steep
learning curve, is an excellent program. My database only has about 7000 people
in it so far (I have a separate database for my husband's family), but it does
open up very quickly.

Margaret Lindsey Smith

I agree with Margaret. I bought FTM 2009 when I got  my last new computer
because  I had heard FTM Version 16 was incompatable with Vista. I could not
download my backup data discs into FTM 2009 because it would not accept the
backup format from Version 16. I did enter some data and HATED everything about
FTM 2009. I then found on the FTM message board that so many were complaining
about the FTM 2009 that FTM offered a free PATCH download that took care of the
incompatability of Version 16 (the best they ever made as far as I'm concerned)
with Vista. I downloaded the Patch and my trusty old FTM Version 16 and
everything works fine. I am not super computer savvy, just enough to get by with
my genealogy, the internet and storing files. When something doesn't work I
usually have to call for help, but I did manage to get back to a workable system
in this instance.  :-)
Brenda






   ----- Original Message -----
   From: mlsmith67
   To: genpcncfir@yahoogroups.com
   Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2010 9:44 AM
   Subject: [genpcncfir] Re: computer/FTM problems



   Marcia, I gave up on FTM when the 2009 version came out and, while
"converting" my database to the new format, trashed much of the data. In
addition, it dropped many of the features which I enjoyed, such as being able to
access the FTM data disks from within the program. It appeared to be a "stripped
down" version of FTM, intended for people who were just beginning in genealogy,
rather than those of use who had been using FTM for years. Not exactly rewarding
to previously loyal customers!

   I've gone with The Master Genealogist, which, while it has a fairly steep
learning curve, is an excellent program. My database only has about 7000 people
in it so far (I have a separate database for my husband's family), but it does
open up very quickly.

   Margaret Lindsey Smith





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

I use FTM V16 too. I downloaded the patch and it works fine. I hate the all over
the screen mess of FTM 2008, my last upgrade that I put on and took off.
FTM V16 lets you store 250 pages per name and I love this feature.
I, however, don't use the FTM backup version but always export to a ged file
because a ged file is accepted by any genealogy program. I have backup geds on
several media since I have about 76,000 people in mine from Nash, Wilson, and
Edgecombe Counties. Most are connected in some way.
I have other ged family files that I sometimes look at, but not in a long time.
I love being able to find what I want quickly in V16 and will use it until it
can be used no more. But with its popularity, I think they will do something
about a version that will be used as long as "lots" of people request it.
Faye Hays




   ----- Original Message -----
   From: Brenda Stocks
   To: genpcncfir@yahoogroups.com
   Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2010 10:08 AM
   Subject: Re: [genpcncfir] Re: computer/FTM problems




   I agree with Margaret. I bought FTM 2009 when I got my last new computer
because I had heard FTM Version 16 was incompatable with Vista. I could not
download my backup data discs into FTM 2009 because it would not accept the
backup format from Version 16. I did enter some data and HATED everything about
FTM 2009. I then found on the FTM message board that so many were complaining
about the FTM 2009 that FTM offered a free PATCH download that took care of the
incompatability of Version 16 (the best they ever made as far as I'm concerned)
with Vista. I downloaded the Patch and my trusty old FTM Version 16 and
everything works fine. I am not super computer savvy, just enough to get by with
my genealogy, the internet and storing files. When something doesn't work I
usually have to call for help, but I did manage to get back to a workable system
in this instance. :-)
   Brenda

   ----- Original Message -----
   From: mlsmith67
   To: genpcncfir@yahoogroups.com
   Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2010 9:44 AM
   Subject: [genpcncfir] Re: computer/FTM problems

   Marcia, I gave up on FTM when the 2009 version came out and, while
"converting" my database to the new format, trashed much of the data. In
addition, it dropped many of the features which I enjoyed, such as being able to
access the FTM data disks from within the program. It appeared to be a "stripped
down" version of FTM, intended for people who were just beginning in genealogy,
rather than those of use who had been using FTM for years. Not exactly rewarding
to previously loyal customers!

   I've gone with The Master Genealogist, which, while it has a fairly steep
learning curve, is an excellent program. My database only has about 7000 people
in it so far (I have a separate database for my husband's family), but it does
open up very quickly.

   Margaret Lindsey Smith

   [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Marcia,

I have 2011 Family Tree and it is working good on our Dell computer.   We
did have trouble with 2010 until we downloaded the update for 2010.

Doris Bohall


In a message dated 12/22/2010 3:54:37 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
marcia_mclawhorn@... writes:




Merry Christmas to all!

A question for the Group.
Slightly  off topic ...

I don't do genealogy as much as before, mostly  because of a high level of
frustration that I have with  my new laptop and the 2010 version of FTM.

History: I tripped over my  laptop's wire, pulling it off of the table. [No
data loss,
I had  a backup.] My son generously purchased & sent me a new laptop that
he thought would be very good processor. It would have worked good  with my
2005 FTM program, but it's Vista operating system  required I upgrade and I
purchased the Family Tree Maker  2010.

My 1st ISSUE is the way the FTM2010 processes its  database, which is quite
different than my old version did. I think  it brings the entire database
into RAM
for some of its processes -  like building an index or merging two
individuals -
making very large  files very cumbersome. (IE my 80,000 database file takes
5
long  hours to open and build its an index.) NOT FUN!!!

On top of that,  the laptop [has a single core] goes to 100% usage during
these
processes. To solve this, I selected only direct  ancestors, reducing my
file to
8,000 (10%) and reducing the  processing time is a mere 30 minutes.
Still NOT  FUN!  And now, I have two copies of some people!

My 2nd  ISSUE is that FTM2010 made other signifant improvements, which has
taken me months and months to edit my smaller databases to correct.  I've
started
converting the 8,000 file, but the 80,000 one is an  overwhelming task
still looming.

One such task is straightening  my address field data, which changed from
one
line to two lines. The  first line is City/State/Country, which is verified
by FTM.
The second  line holds local addresses, as well as, comments [like "WWII
action"]
which  I have used extensively.

Now, don't get me wrong, the end result  looks like it will be much better
product than before. Especially in  finding specific references quickly.

My 3rd ISSUE is  how frequently FTM stops running as a task on my desktop
(but is  still running on the computer using 91% CPU). I must wait till it
ends
before restarting FTM. I have no idea whether this is a  computer issue or
a
application issue.
________________________________________________

I  don't know if any of you have faced these issues. If you have, how  have
you
overcomed them? Or perhaps like me, you've been sucking it  up.

Here's the Question  - - - -
Will a dual core [or  larger] machine solve my processing issues? OR
Assuming there's no  hope for this version of FTM,

I should buy FTM2011,  which fixes the CPU usage and crashing problems? OR
There's no  hope any of these FTMs, I should buy a different program.  OR
I should do both or something else ...

Waiting to hear from  you - Merry Christmas, Marcia

[Non-text portions of this message have  been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Margaret
Welcome to TMG (The Master Genealogist)!
I have been a very happy user since 1999 when I transferred my data from
UFT (Ultimate Family Tree).
Will enjoy reading your messages on the TMG List.

~ Rae Jean
Visiting the Past   http://home.earthlink.net/~rjfamily/

_______________________________________

On 12/23/2010 8:44 AM, mlsmith67 wrote:

I've gone with The Master Genealogist, which, while it has a fairly
steep learning curve, is an excellent program.
My database only has about 7000 people in it so far (I have a separate
database for my husband's family), but it does open up very quickly.
Margaret Lindsey Smith

I have a Brittaina on my tree who I thought was a Johnson but turned up as a
"Summerrell" on a marriage record. She was born abt 1848. In 1862, she married
John Wooten. Presently, I have the names of nine of their children. If anyone
has any insight it would be appreciated.




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Happy New Year everybody!

I have been constructing my family ancestry for a while now and continue to run
across two townships identified on Federal census records for which I'm
unfamiliar. These are: Andrews and Beaver Dam. I would like your help in
identifying approximately where these townships are located within Pitt County.
A link to a map showing these would be even better.

Thanks in advance for your help.

Fred Stokes

Try this:  http://www.lib.unc.edu/dc/ncmaps/?CISOROOT=/ncmaps   Search Pitt
County.  There is a map that shows Beaver Dam between Greenville and Farmville.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Fred Stokes" <acstokes@...>
To: "Pitt County Geneology Group" <genpcncfir@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, January 3, 2011 9:43:57 AM
Subject: [genpcncfir] Pitt County Townships

 




Happy New Year everybody!

I have been constructing my family ancestry for a while now and continue to run
across two townships identified on Federal census records for which I'm
unfamiliar. These are: Andrews and Beaver Dam. I would like your help in
identifying approximately where these townships are located within Pitt County.
A link to a map showing these would be even better.

Thanks in advance for your help.

Fred Stokes



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

For the Andrews District: 

Go to the Pitt County Family Researchers Website and click "on line
resources".  From there look at the 1850 Census and you will see a  map
showing the Districts.  You will find Andrews on the top center.



Original Message -----
From: "Judy N. Lewis" <jnlewis@...>
To: genpcncfir@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, January 3, 2011 10:35:49 AM
Subject: Re: [genpcncfir] Pitt County Townships

 






Try this:  http://www.lib.unc.edu/dc/ncmaps/?CISOROOT=/ncmaps   Search Pitt
County.  There is a map that shows Beaver Dam between Greenville and Farmville.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Fred Stokes" < acstokes@... >
To: "Pitt County Geneology Group" < genpcncfir@yahoogroups.com >
Sent: Monday, January 3, 2011 9:43:57 AM
Subject: [genpcncfir] Pitt County Townships

 

Happy New Year everybody!

I have been constructing my family ancestry for a while now and continue to run
across two townships identified on Federal census records for which I'm
unfamiliar. These are: Andrews and Beaver Dam. I would like your help in
identifying approximately where these townships are located within Pitt County.
A link to a map showing these would be even better.

Thanks in advance for your help.

Fred Stokes

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Judy,
Thanks to you I was able to find Andrews on the 1850 census map along with other
townships that no longer exist.

Fred


-----Original Message-----
From: "Judy N. Lewis"
Sent: Jan 3, 2011 2:10 PM
To: genpcncfir@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [genpcncfir] Pitt County Townships

For the Andrews District:

Go to the Pitt County Family Researchers Website and click "on line resources". 
From there look at the 1850 Census and you will see a  map showing the
Districts.  You will find Andrews on the top center.

Original Message -----
From: "Judy N. Lewis" <jnlewis@...>
To: genpcncfir@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, January 3, 2011 10:35:49 AM
Subject: Re: [genpcncfir] Pitt County Townships



Try this:  http://www.lib.unc.edu/dc/ncmaps/?CISOROOT=/ncmaps   Search Pitt
County.  There is a map that shows Beaver Dam between Greenville and Farmville.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Fred Stokes" < acstokes@... >
To: "Pitt County Geneology Group" < genpcncfir@yahoogroups.com >
Sent: Monday, January 3, 2011 9:43:57 AM
Subject: [genpcncfir] Pitt County Townships



Happy New Year everybody!

I have been constructing my family ancestry for a while now and continue to run
across two townships identified on Federal census records for which I'm
unfamiliar. These are: Andrews and Beaver Dam. I would like your help in
identifying approximately where these townships are located within Pitt County.
A link to a map showing these would be even better.

Thanks in advance for your help.

Fred Stokes

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

G'morning, Group......
             Please see the below notice of Lenoir County's (NC) tribute to the
Civil War.
It should be a very interesting ....  and yes,....  fun time!!!  :)     Our
area, here in Kinston N.C.,
is filled with History!!!!

I wish successful researching and good health to you and yours for this new year
2011 !!!!!
                 Jewelle

jewelle@...
jewellebaker@...
Researching: (Main Capitalized)
BAKER, Barrow, BEAMAN, BLOUNT, Bonner, Bours, Braxton, CANNON, Carraway,
COX, Chester, Dail, ELLIS, Faircloth, Gardner, HANCOCK, HARDEE, Hardison,
Harris, Harper, Harrington, Heath, Hollyman  (all sp), JACKSON, Johnson,
Jones, Letchworth, Manning, McGLOHON (all sp), McGOWAN, McKeel, Mills,
Mitchell, Mumford, PHILLIPS, Price, Shaw, Smith, Sumrell, Stocks, Stokes,
Tyson, Vandiford, Walls, Walston, Weeks, Wilkerson, WINGATE, Wetherington,
Worthington,  plus ++++

GenealogyPITT Co NC Friends In Research
  (Serving all Eastern/Coastal NC Counties)
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/genpcncfir
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/genpcncfir/messages

eMail scan by NAV & certified Virus Free

----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 10:11 PM
Subject: Lenoir County Civil War Sesquicentennial Commemoration opening weekend
activities, Jan. 28-30, 2011


      See below for a partial listing of Kinston/Lenoir County activities for the
Opening Weekend of its Civil War Sesquicentennial Commemoration on January
28-30, 2011.
     More info at www.visitkinston.com











[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

This is a reminder to all who wish to subscribe to the Pitt County Genealogy
Quarterly for 2011. Make your checks payable to Pitt County Family Researchers
for $30  and mail in time for receipt by Jan. 31, 2011. The PCFR mailing address
is in the article below, copied from the Pitt County Family Researchers'
website. If they don't receive payment by the end of January and your Quarterly
has to be mailed separately from the bulk mailing at a later date, there will be
an extra $2.50 postage charge for every Quarterly not mailed in the bulk
mailings. The Quarterlies come out in Feb., May, August, and Nov.

There is a link in the article below that will take you to the Contents of every
back issue of the Quarterlies. If you wish to order back issues the cost is
$7.50 + $2.50 postage ($10.00 total) for EACH back issue ordered. These will not
be sent to you in the quarterly bulk mailing of the new Quarterlies....this is a
separate transaction and will be mailed separately

There are also links below for Subscription and Query forms that you can print
out. Each subscriber may submit up to four queries eah year.

Happy New Year!
Brenda Stocks
                                                                        
++++++++++


Pitt County Family Researchers' quarterly publication

Winner of the NC Genealogical Society's Award for Excellence, 2004.

View the Tables of Contents, 1994-2009.

Subscription Information
Annual subscription of $30 includes our acclaimed Pitt County Genealogical
Quarterly. Subscribers may submit 4 (four) free queries annually. Back issues
may be purchased for $7.50 + $2.50 postage per number.
Note: Subscriptions and renewals paid after Jan. 31st require additional mailing
costs of $2.50 postage per number missed.

Enclose $30 with your PCGQ Subscription and Query Forms and mail to:

Pitt County Family Researchers, Inc.
P. O. Box 2608
Greenville, NC 27836-0608

Back Issues: $7.50 + $2.50 postage


















[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

I'm sorry the links to the Quarterly Content pages and for the subscription
and query forms don't seem to work in the email below. The following link
will take you to the PCFR website and from there you can click the links for
the contents and the subscription and query forms.
http://www.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~ncpcfr/

Brenda


----- Original Message -----
From: "Brenda Stocks" <bdstocks@...>
To: <genpcncfir@yahoogroups.com>; <nc-pcfr@...>
Sent: Monday, January 10, 2011 2:54 PM
Subject: [NC-PCFR] Pitt County Genealogical Quarterly


> This is a reminder to all who wish to subscribe to the Pitt County
> Genealogy Quarterly for 2011. Make your checks payable to Pitt County
> Family Researchers for $30  and mail in time for receipt by Jan. 31, 2011.
> The PCFR mailing address is in the article below, copied from the Pitt
> County Family Researchers' website. If they don't receive payment by the
> end of January and your Quarterly has to be mailed separately from the
> bulk mailing at a later date, there will be an extra $2.50 postage charge
> for every Quarterly not mailed in the bulk mailings. The Quarterlies come
> out in Feb., May, August, and Nov.
>
> There is a link in the article below that will take you to the Contents of
> every back issue of the Quarterlies. If you wish to order back issues the
> cost is $7.50 + $2.50 postage ($10.00 total) for EACH back issue ordered.
> These will not be sent to you in the quarterly bulk mailing of the new
> Quarterlies....this is a separate transaction and will be mailed
> separately
>
> There are also links below for Subscription and Query forms that you can
> print out. Each subscriber may submit up to four queries eah year.
>
> Happy New Year!
> Brenda Stocks
>
> ++++++++++
>
>
> Pitt County Family Researchers' quarterly publication
>
> Winner of the NC Genealogical Society's Award for Excellence, 2004.
>
> View the Tables of Contents, 1994-2009.
>
> Subscription Information
> Annual subscription of $30 includes our acclaimed Pitt County Genealogical
> Quarterly. Subscribers may submit 4 (four) free queries annually. Back
> issues may be purchased for $7.50 + $2.50 postage per number.
> Note: Subscriptions and renewals paid after Jan. 31st require additional
> mailing costs of $2.50 postage per number missed.
>
> Enclose $30 with your PCGQ Subscription and Query Forms and mail to:
>
> Pitt County Family Researchers, Inc.
> P. O. Box 2608
> Greenville, NC 27836-0608
>
> Back Issues: $7.50 + $2.50 postage
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Pitt County Family Researchers  website: http://www.rootsweb.com/~ncpcfr/
>
> Message archives address:
> http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/index?list=nc-pcfr
>
>
> -------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
> NC-PCFR-request@... with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
> quotes in the subject and the body of the message

I'm sorry the links to the Quarterly Content pages and for the subscription
and query forms don't seem to work in the email below. The following link
will take you to the PCFR website and from there you can click the links for
the contents and the subscription and query forms.
http://www.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~ncpcfr/

Brenda

----- Original Message -----
From: "Brenda Stocks" <bdstocks@...>
To: <genpcncfir@yahoogroups.com>; <nc-pcfr@...>
Sent: Monday, January 10, 2011 2:54 PM
Subject: [NC-PCFR] Pitt County Genealogical Quarterly


> This is a reminder to all who wish to subscribe to the Pitt County
> Genealogy Quarterly for 2011. Make your checks payable to Pitt County
> Family Researchers for $30  and mail in time for receipt by Jan. 31, 2011.
> The PCFR mailing address is in the article below, copied from the Pitt
> County Family Researchers' website. If they don't receive payment by the
> end of January and your Quarterly has to be mailed separately from the
> bulk mailing at a later date, there will be an extra $2.50 postage charge
> for every Quarterly not mailed in the bulk mailings. The Quarterlies come
> out in Feb., May, August, and Nov.
>
> There is a link in the article below that will take you to the Contents of
> every back issue of the Quarterlies. If you wish to order back issues the
> cost is $7.50 + $2.50 postage ($10.00 total) for EACH back issue ordered.
> These will not be sent to you in the quarterly bulk mailing of the new
> Quarterlies....this is a separate transaction and will be mailed
> separately
>
> There are also links below for Subscription and Query forms that you can
> print out. Each subscriber may submit up to four queries eah year.
>
> Happy New Year!
> Brenda Stocks
>
> ++++++++++
>
>
> Pitt County Family Researchers' quarterly publication
>
> Winner of the NC Genealogical Society's Award for Excellence, 2004.
>
> View the Tables of Contents, 1994-2009.
>
> Subscription Information
> Annual subscription of $30 includes our acclaimed Pitt County Genealogical
> Quarterly. Subscribers may submit 4 (four) free queries annually. Back
> issues may be purchased for $7.50 + $2.50 postage per number.
> Note: Subscriptions and renewals paid after Jan. 31st require additional
> mailing costs of $2.50 postage per number missed.
>
> Enclose $30 with your PCGQ Subscription and Query Forms and mail to:
>
> Pitt County Family Researchers, Inc.
> P. O. Box 2608
> Greenville, NC 27836-0608
>
> Back Issues: $7.50 + $2.50 postage
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Pitt County Family Researchers  website: http://www.rootsweb.com/~ncpcfr/
>
> Message archives address:
> http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/index?list=nc-pcfr
>
>
> -------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
> NC-PCFR-request@... with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
> quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Thought this was worth forwarding...  Debbie

   ----- Original Message -----
   From: "Mmaker52" <mmaker52@...>
   To: <ncbertie-l@...>
   Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 4:13 PM
   Subject: [NCBERTIE] Recording a Cemetery

   THE RECORDING OF A CEMETERY

   BY THELMA GREENE REAGAN

   Today we walked where others walked
   On a lonely, windswept hill;
   Today we talked where others cried
   For Loved Ones whose lives are stilled.

   Today our hearts were touched
   By graves of tiny babies;
   Snatched from the arms of loving kin,
   In the heartbreak of the ages.

   Today we saw where the grandparents lay
   In the last sleep of their time;
   Lying under the trees and clouds -
   Their beds kissed by the sun and wind.

   Today we wondered about an unmarked spot;
   Who lies beneath this hollowed ground?
   Was it a babe, child, young or old?
   No indication could be found.

   Today we saw where Mom and Dad lay.
   We had been here once before
   On a day we'd all like to forget,
   But will remember forever more.

   Today we recorded for kith and kin
   The graves of ancestors past;
   To be preserved for generations hence,
   A record we hope will last.

   Cherish it, my friend; preserve it, my friend,
   For stones sometimes crumble to dust
   And generations of folks yet to come
   Will be grateful for your trust.


   -------------------------------
   To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
NCBERTIE-request@... with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in
the subject and the body of the message

   ----- Original Message -----
   From: "Trish Worthington Cobb" <turniproots@...>
   To: <nc-pcfr@...>
   Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 10:30 AM
   Subject: Re: [NC-PCFR] CEMETERY BOOKS

   Bill,

   Maybe PCHS will consider a reprinting at some time.  That was a wonderful
project that you devoted a number of years of your time to doing and I think it
is fabulous that Mary got so interested in it and was so much help to you.

   My friend Peg was telling me all about the recent removal of graves from the
old Mills cemetery out near Highway 33.  What a fascinating account she told.  I
wish I had taken the time to go out there to observe.  Her account was full of
details that I could not have imagined.  I plan to contact Ward to see if he can
put together a program on the subject.  I think it would be interesting if he
could bring along the two men who assisted him.  Peg said that they were quite
experienced and full of interesting information.

   I would like to see the information on the family that was recovered in the
removal.  Have you ever been able to link this Mills family to any descendants
in the area.  I know they must be related to Peg's Mills ancestors, but not sure
if it was ever determined just how they connect.

   We missed you at the VOY meeting Wednesday.  Hope you and Mary are well.

   Trish



   ----- Original Message -----
   From: "William Kittrell" <wbk99@...>
   To: <NC-PCFR@...>
   Sent: Monday, January 10, 2011 9:25 PM
   Subject: [NC-PCFR] CEMETERY BOOKS


   Liz Sparrow reported at today's Pitt County Historical Society
   board meeting that 494 copies had been sold out of
   a printing of 500.

   If you would like a copy of this book please order before they
   are sold out.

   Thanks to all of you who have purchase a copy.  As most of you
   know Mary and I did not receive money from the sale of the books.
   Our work was volunteer, paying our own expenses.

   Completing this survey of the cemeteries in Pitt County has always
   been my goal.  Mary worked with me for 5 years to do this.  If it
   had not been for her this project would have never happen.
   My name is on the book but Mary desires most of the credit.

   My hope is that it helped many in their family research.

   Please post any queries about your family.  Lets get this site busy
   with posting.  I am planning to post some material I have.

   Bill


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

That is beautiful Debbie. Thanks for sharing. Amy Hunt





-----Original Message-----
From: Debbie Fields Murphy <msfields@...>
To: genpcncfir <genpcncfir@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Fri, Jan 14, 2011 5:36 pm
Subject: [genpcncfir] Re: [NC-PCFR] CEMETERY BOOKS




Thought this was worth forwarding... Debbie

----- Original Message -----
From: "Mmaker52" <mmaker52@...>
To: <ncbertie-l@...>
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 4:13 PM
Subject: [NCBERTIE] Recording a Cemetery

THE RECORDING OF A CEMETERY

BY THELMA GREENE REAGAN

Today we walked where others walked
On a lonely, windswept hill;
Today we talked where others cried
For Loved Ones whose lives are stilled.

Today our hearts were touched
By graves of tiny babies;
Snatched from the arms of loving kin,
In the heartbreak of the ages.

Today we saw where the grandparents lay
In the last sleep of their time;
Lying under the trees and clouds -
Their beds kissed by the sun and wind.

Today we wondered about an unmarked spot;
Who lies beneath this hollowed ground?
Was it a babe, child, young or old?
No indication could be found.

Today we saw where Mom and Dad lay.
We had been here once before
On a day we'd all like to forget,
But will remember forever more.

Today we recorded for kith and kin
The graves of ancestors past;
To be preserved for generations hence,
A record we hope will last.

Cherish it, my friend; preserve it, my friend,
For stones sometimes crumble to dust
And generations of folks yet to come
Will be grateful for your trust.

-------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
NCBERTIE-request@... with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in
the subject and the body of the message

----- Original Message -----
From: "Trish Worthington Cobb" <turniproots@...>
To: <nc-pcfr@...>
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 10:30 AM
Subject: Re: [NC-PCFR] CEMETERY BOOKS

Bill,

Maybe PCHS will consider a reprinting at some time. That was a wonderful project
that you devoted a number of years of your time to doing and I think it is
fabulous that Mary got so interested in it and was so much help to you.

My friend Peg was telling me all about the recent removal of graves from the old
Mills cemetery out near Highway 33. What a fascinating account she told. I wish
I had taken the time to go out there to observe. Her account was full of details
that I could not have imagined. I plan to contact Ward to see if he can put
together a program on the subject. I think it would be interesting if he could
bring along the two men who assisted him. Peg said that they were quite
experienced and full of interesting information.

I would like to see the information on the family that was recovered in the
removal. Have you ever been able to link this Mills family to any descendants in
the area. I know they must be related to Peg's Mills ancestors, but not sure if
it was ever determined just how they connect.

We missed you at the VOY meeting Wednesday. Hope you and Mary are well.

Trish

----- Original Message -----
From: "William Kittrell" <wbk99@...>
To: <NC-PCFR@...>
Sent: Monday, January 10, 2011 9:25 PM
Subject: [NC-PCFR] CEMETERY BOOKS

Liz Sparrow reported at today's Pitt County Historical Society
board meeting that 494 copies had been sold out of
a printing of 500.

If you would like a copy of this book please order before they
are sold out.

Thanks to all of you who have purchase a copy. As most of you
know Mary and I did not receive money from the sale of the books.
Our work was volunteer, paying our own expenses.

Completing this survey of the cemeteries in Pitt County has always
been my goal. Mary worked with me for 5 years to do this. If it
had not been for her this project would have never happen.
My name is on the book but Mary desires most of the credit.

My hope is that it helped many in their family research.

Please post any queries about your family. Lets get this site busy
with posting. I am planning to post some material I have.

Bill

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

I liked it too.

Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 15, 2011, at 11:15 AM, "Amaryllis \"Amy\" W. Hunt" <amaryllish@...>
wrote:

> That is beautiful Debbie. Thanks for sharing. Amy Hunt
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Debbie Fields Murphy <msfields@...>
> To: genpcncfir <genpcncfir@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Fri, Jan 14, 2011 5:36 pm
> Subject: [genpcncfir] Re: [NC-PCFR] CEMETERY BOOKS
>
> Thought this was worth forwarding... Debbie
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mmaker52" <mmaker52@...>
> To: <ncbertie-l@...>
> Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 4:13 PM
> Subject: [NCBERTIE] Recording a Cemetery
>
> THE RECORDING OF A CEMETERY
>
> BY THELMA GREENE REAGAN
>
> Today we walked where others walked
> On a lonely, windswept hill;
> Today we talked where others cried
> For Loved Ones whose lives are stilled.
>
> Today our hearts were touched
> By graves of tiny babies;
> Snatched from the arms of loving kin,
> In the heartbreak of the ages.
>
> Today we saw where the grandparents lay
> In the last sleep of their time;
> Lying under the trees and clouds -
> Their beds kissed by the sun and wind.
>
> Today we wondered about an unmarked spot;
> Who lies beneath this hollowed ground?
> Was it a babe, child, young or old?
> No indication could be found.
>
> Today we saw where Mom and Dad lay.
> We had been here once before
> On a day we'd all like to forget,
> But will remember forever more.
>
> Today we recorded for kith and kin
> The graves of ancestors past;
> To be preserved for generations hence,
> A record we hope will last.
>
> Cherish it, my friend; preserve it, my friend,
> For stones sometimes crumble to dust
> And generations of folks yet to come
> Will be grateful for your trust.
>
> -------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
NCBERTIE-request@... with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in
the subject and the body of the message
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Trish Worthington Cobb" <turniproots@...>
> To: <nc-pcfr@...>
> Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 10:30 AM
> Subject: Re: [NC-PCFR] CEMETERY BOOKS
>
> Bill,
>
> Maybe PCHS will consider a reprinting at some time. That was a wonderful
project that you devoted a number of years of your time to doing and I think it
is fabulous that Mary got so interested in it and was so much help to you.
>
> My friend Peg was telling me all about the recent removal of graves from the
old Mills cemetery out near Highway 33. What a fascinating account she told. I
wish I had taken the time to go out there to observe. Her account was full of
details that I could not have imagined. I plan to contact Ward to see if he can
put together a program on the subject. I think it would be interesting if he
could bring along the two men who assisted him. Peg said that they were quite
experienced and full of interesting information.
>
> I would like to see the information on the family that was recovered in the
removal. Have you ever been able to link this Mills family to any descendants in
the area. I know they must be related to Peg's Mills ancestors, but not sure if
it was ever determined just how they connect.
>
> We missed you at the VOY meeting Wednesday. Hope you and Mary are well.
>
> Trish
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "William Kittrell" <wbk99@...>
> To: <NC-PCFR@...>
> Sent: Monday, January 10, 2011 9:25 PM
> Subject: [NC-PCFR] CEMETERY BOOKS
>
> Liz Sparrow reported at today's Pitt County Historical Society
> board meeting that 494 copies had been sold out of
> a printing of 500.
>
> If you would like a copy of this book please order before they
> are sold out.
>
> Thanks to all of you who have purchase a copy. As most of you
> know Mary and I did not receive money from the sale of the books.
> Our work was volunteer, paying our own expenses.
>
> Completing this survey of the cemeteries in Pitt County has always
> been my goal. Mary worked with me for 5 years to do this. If it
> had not been for her this project would have never happen.
> My name is on the book but Mary desires most of the credit.
>
> My hope is that it helped many in their family research.
>
> Please post any queries about your family. Lets get this site busy
> with posting. I am planning to post some material I have.
>
> Bill
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Looking for information on George Washington Andrews, Washington Andrews, or
Constantine Banner Andrews. They're all lived in or around stokes county. Please
e-mail me at andrews20021@... if you have Info on these men. Thanks
everyone!

North Carolina Death Certificates, 1909-1975
Name: Constantine Banner Andrews
Gender: Male Race: White Age: 73
Birth Date: 27 Aug 1855 Birth Place: Stokes, North Carolina, United States
Death Date: 19 Apr 1929 Death Location: Oldtown, Forsyth
Spouse's name: Martha Mcbride
  Father's name: Washington Andrews [Guilford County]
  Mother's name: Amanda Knight
Burial: Joyce Cemetery
-------------------------
     Benjamin Justice 62 Malinda Justice 48 Sam. Landrum Justice 19 Sarah Justice
17 Constantine Andrews 18
Name: Constantine Andrews Home in 1880: Shelby, Cleveland, North Carolina Age:
18 Estimated birth year: abt 1862 Birthplace: North Carolina Father's
birthplace: North Carolina Mother's birthplace: North Carolina Occupation: Farm
Laborer Marital Status: Single Race: White Gender: Male
---------
G W Andrews 45 Wheel Right Amanda Andrews 41 William Andrews 17 James Andrews 21
John Andrews 15 Robert Andrews 10 David Andrews 8 Constantine Andrews 4 An I
Mabe 32
Name: Constantine Andrews Age in 1860: 4 Birth Year: abt 1856 Home in 1860:
Stokes, North Carolina Gender: Male Post Office: Danbury
-----------
Name: Robert Banner Andrews Date of Birth: 1893 Birth County: Stokes Parent1
Name: Constantine Banner Andrews Roll Number: B_C090_68001 Volume: 1 Page: 76

Name: Della Fay Andrews Date of Birth: 1891 Birth County: Stokes Parent1 Name:
Constantine Banner Andrews Roll Number: B_C090_68001 Volume: 1 Page: 77

Name: Della Faye Bolen
[Della Faye Andrews] Gender: Female Race: White Age: 77  widowed
  Birth Date: 28 Mar 1891 Birth Place: North Carolina, United States Death Date:
31 Dec 1968 Death Location: Winston-Salem, Forsyth Father's name: Constantine B
Andrews Mother's name: Martha Mcbride Residence: Winston-Salem, Forsyth, North
Carolina
Burial: Frosyth Memorial Park
------------


Name: Martha Mcbride Andrews
Gender: Female Race: White Age: 91
Birth Date: 16 Jul 1870 Birth Place: North Carolina, United States
Death Date: 28 Sep 1961 Death Location: Winston-Salem, Forsyth
Spouse's name: C B Andrews
Father's name: Obediah Mcbride
Mother's name: Nancy Joyce
Residence: Winston-Salem, Forsyth, North Carolina
Joyce Family Cemetery


Sue


--- In genpcncfir@yahoogroups.com, "andrews20021@..." <andrews20021@...> wrote:
>
> Looking for information on George Washington Andrews, Washington Andrews, or
Constantine Banner Andrews. They're all lived in or around stokes county. Please
e-mail me at andrews20021@... if you have Info on these men. Thanks everyone!
>

Come join The Edgecombe County Genealogical Society for
"Show 'N Tell" night
Tuesday, 18 January
Edgecombe County Memorial Library, Pender Room
919 Main Street
Tarboro, NC
Guest are welcome!
WE hope to see you Tuesday night!

G'morning Group.....
         Some of you may be interested in the below information ......  read on!!
Information about the beautiful Edgecombe Co., NC Heritage book - 2009 may be
found at;
http://www.county-heritage.com/nc/edgecombe/samples.php
Note that you may click on the index (pdf logo bottom left of this page), and
find hundreds of folk whose stories are included in the book!

Finally, ordering information is found at;
http://www.county-heritage.com/nc/edgecombe/order.php

  Don Mills <coheritbooks@...>
*****************************************************

         Jewelle
jewelle@...
jewellebaker@...
Researching: (Main Capitalized)
BAKER, Barrow, BEAMAN, BLOUNT, Bonner, Bours, Braxton, CANNON, Carraway,
COX, Chester, Dail, ELLIS, Faircloth, Gardner, HANCOCK, HARDEE, Hardison,
Harris, Harper, Harrington, Heath, Hollyman  (all sp), JACKSON, Johnson,
Jones, Letchworth, Manning, McGLOHON (all sp), McGOWAN, McKeel, Mills,
Mitchell, Mumford, PHILLIPS, Price, Shaw, Smith, Sumrell, Stocks, Stokes,
Tyson, Vandiford, Walls, Walston, Weeks, Wilkerson, WINGATE, Wetherington,
Worthington,  plus ++++

GenealogyPITT Co NC Friends In Research
  (Serving all Eastern/Coastal NC Counties)
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/genpcncfir
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/genpcncfir/messages

eMail scan by NAV & certified Virus Free


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

G'morning Group...
         Read the below excerpt gleaned from Dick Eastman's 09 Jan 11 post:
Genealogy Conference in Port Charlotte, Florida


The Charlotte County Genealogical Society is hosting a one-day conference on
Saturday, February 5. The theme will be "Update Your Genealogy Toolbox." The
society has invited  Dick Eastman to be the guest speaker. He will be making
presentations on:






   Genealogy Searches on Google
   The Organized Genealogist
   The Latest Technology for Genealogists
   Where is Genealogy Software Headed?
The conference will be held at the Salvation Army Center at 2120 Loveland
Boulevard,  Port Charlotte.

Read the rest of the story »

**************************************************************

If any of you attend, please share your views with our dynamic Group!

         Jewelle

jewelle@...
jewellebaker@...
Researching: (Main Capitalized)
BAKER, Barrow, BEAMAN, BLOUNT, Bonner, Bours, Braxton, CANNON, Carraway,
COX, Chester, Dail, ELLIS, Faircloth, Gardner, HANCOCK, HARDEE, Hardison,
Harris, Harper, Harrington, Heath, Hollyman  (all sp), JACKSON, Johnson,
Jones, Letchworth, Manning, McGLOHON (all sp), McGOWAN, McKeel, Mills,
Mitchell, Mumford, PHILLIPS, Price, Shaw, Smith, Sumrell, Stocks, Stokes,
Tyson, Vandiford, Walls, Walston, Weeks, Wilkerson, WINGATE, Wetherington,
Worthington,  plus ++++

GenealogyPITT Co NC Friends In Research
  (Serving all Eastern/Coastal NC Counties)
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/genpcncfir
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/genpcncfir/messages

eMail scan by NAV & certified Virus Free


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Greetings Group.....
         Perhaps some of you will be interested in the following:

Information about the beautiful Edgecombe Co., NC Heritage book - 2009 may be
found at;
http://www.county-heritage.com/nc/edgecombe/samples.php

Note that you may click on the index (pdf logo bottom left of this page), and
find hundreds of folk whose stories are included in the book!
Finally, ordering information is found at;
http://www.county-heritage.com/nc/edgecombe/order.php

             Jewelle

jewelle@...
jewellebaker@...

GenealogyPITT Co NC Friends In Research
  (Serving all Eastern/Coastal NC Counties)
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/genpcncfir
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/genpcncfir/messages

eMail scan by NAV & certified Virus Free


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]