On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 6:57 PM, sheldon waxman <sheldonw72@...> wrote:

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: pakistan institute <pihrights@...>
Date: Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 6:50 PM
Subject: LAWYER-ARTIST SUES THE MUMBAI ART CRITIC FOR 1 CENT FOR SLANDER AND HYPOCRISY
To: "AboveTheLaw.com" <newsletters@...>

Peerhaps you could mention the enclosed story in your brilliant e-Journal. Regards

M. Iftikhar Hussein RAJPOOOT   BCom AM

--
Sheldon (Shelly) Waxman
http://www.postpubco.com/newpulp.htm
www.independentcontractor.info

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: pakistan institute <pihrights@...>
Date: Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 6:50 PM
Subject: LAWYER-ARTIST SUES THE MUMBAI ART CRITIC FOR 1 CENT FOR SLANDER AND HYPOCRISY
To: "AboveTheLaw.com" <newsletters@...>

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: R. J. Tavel, J.D. <rj3@...>
Date: Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 1:23 PM
Subject: Yahoo Sells All Its Users Private Email Contents to U.S. Agencies for Small Price
To:

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: R. J. Tavel, J.D. <rj3@...>
Date: Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 11:52 AM
Subject: 1938 Austria --Land of "The Sound of Music" Story
To:


Kitty Werthmann spoke at the Eagle Forum national conference a couple of months back. She told a powerful story about what it was like growing up under Hitler.

*America Truly is the Greatest Country in the World. Don’t Let Freedom
Slip Away*

By: Kitty Werthmann  http://www.timebomb2000.com/vb/showthread.php?t=349456

What I am about to tell you is something you’ve probably never heard or
will ever read in history books.

I believe that I am an eyewitness to history. I cannot tell you that
Hitler took Austria by tanks and guns; it would distort history. We
elected him by a landslide – 98% of the vote. I’ve never read that in
any American publications. Everyone thinks that Hitler just rolled in
with his tanks and took Austria by force.

In 1938, Austria was in deep Depression. Nearly one-third of our
workforce was unemployed. We had 25% inflation and 25% bank loan
interest rates.

Farmers and business people were declaring bankruptcy daily. Young
people were going from house to house begging for food. Not that they
didn’t want to work; there simply weren’t any jobs. My mother was a
Christian woman and believed in helping people in need. Every day we
cooked a big kettle of soup and baked bread to feed those poor, hungry
people – about 30 daily.

The Communist Party and the National Socialist Party were fighting each
other. Blocks and blocks of cities like Vienna, Linz, and Graz were
destroyed. The people became desperate and petitioned the government to
let them decide what kind of government they wanted.

We looked to our neighbor on the north, Germany , where Hitler had been
in power since 1933. We had been told that they didn’t have unemployment
or crime, and they had a high standard of living. Nothing was ever said
about persecution of any group -- Jewish or otherwise. We were led to
believe that everyone was happy. We wanted the same way of life in
Austria . We were promised that a vote for Hitler would mean the end of
unemployment and help for the family. Hitler also said that businesses
would be assisted, and farmers would get their farms back. Ninety-eight
percent of the population voted to annex Austria to Germany and have
Hitler for our ruler.

We were overjoyed, and for three days we danced in the streets and had
candlelight parades. The new government opened up big field kitchens and
everyone was fed.

After the election, German officials were appointed, and like a miracle,
we suddenly had law and order. Three or four weeks later, everyone was
employed. The government made sure that a lot of work was created
through the Public Work Service.


Hitler decided we should have equal rights for women. Before this, it
was a custom that married Austrian women did not work outside the home.
An able-bodied husband would be looked down on if he couldn’t support
his family. Many women in the teaching profession were elated that they
could retain the jobs they previously had been required to give up for
marriage.

*Hitler Targets Education – Eliminates Religious Instruction for Children:*

Our education was nationalized. I attended a very good public school.
The population was predominantly Catholic, so we had religion in our
schools. The day we elected Hitler (March 13, 1938), I walked into my
schoolroom to find the crucifix replaced by Hitler’s picture hanging
next to a Nazi flag. Our teacher, a very devout woman, stood up and told
the class we wouldn’t pray or have religion anymore. Instead, we sang
“Deutschland, Deutschland, Uber Alles,” and had physical education.

Sunday became National Youth Day with compulsory attendance. Parents
were not pleased about the sudden change in curriculum. They were told
that if they did not send us, they would receive a stiff letter of
warning the first time. The second time they would be fined the
equivalent of $300, and the third time they would be subject to jail.
The first two hours consisted of political indoctrination. The rest of
the day we had sports. As time went along, we loved it. Oh, we had so
much fun and got our sports equipment free. We would go home and
gleefully tell our parents about the wonderful time we had.

My mother was very unhappy. When the next term started, she took me out
of public school and put me in a convent. I told her she couldn’t do
that and she told me that someday when I grew up, I would be grateful.
There was a very good curriculum, but hardly any fun – no sports, and no
political indoctrination. I hated it at first but felt I could tolerate
it. Every once in a while, on holidays, I went home. I would go back to
my old friends and ask what was going on and what they were doing. Their
loose lifestyle was very alarming to me. They lived without religion. By
that time unwed mothers were glorified for having a baby for Hitler. It
seemed strange to me that our society changed so suddenly. As time went
along, I realized what a great deed my mother did so that I wasn’t
exposed to that kind of humanistic philosophy.

*Equal Rights Hits Home:*

In 1939, the war started and a food bank was established. All food was
rationed and could only be purchased using food stamps. At the same
time, a full-employment law was passed which meant if you didn’t work,
you didn’t get a ration card, and if you didn’t have a card, you starved
to death. Women who stayed home to raise their families didn’t have any
marketable skills and often had to take jobs more suited for men.

Soon after this, the draft was implemented. _It was compulsory for young
people, male and female_, to give one year to the labor corps. During
the day, the girls worked on the farms, and at night they returned to
their barracks for military training just like the boys. They were
trained to be anti-aircraft gunners and participated in the signal
corps. After the labor corps, they were not discharged but were used in
the front lines. When I go back to Austria to visit my family and
friends, most of these women are emotional cripples because they just
were not equipped to handle the horrors of combat. Three months before I
turned 18, I was severely injured in an air raid attack. I nearly had a
leg amputated, so I was spared having to go into the labor corps and
into military service.

*Hitler Restructured the Family Through Daycare:*


When the mothers had to go out into the work force, the government
immediately established child care centers. You could take your children
ages 4 weeks to school age and leave them there around-the-clock, 7 days
a week, under the total care of the government. The state raised a whole
generation of children. There were no motherly women to take care of the
children, just people highly trained in child psychology. By this time,
no one talked about equal rights. We knew we had been had.

*Health Care and Small Business Suffer Under Government Controls:*

*_Before Hitler, we had very good medical care_.* Many American doctors
trained at the University of Vienna . After Hitler, health care was
socialized, free for everyone. Doctors were salaried by the government.
The problem was, since it was free, the people were going to the doctors
for everything. When the good doctor arrived at his office at 8 a.m., 40
people were already waiting and, at the same time, the hospitals were
full. If you needed elective surgery, you had to wait a year or two for
your turn. There was *_no money for research_* as it was poured into
socialized medicine. Research at the medical schools literally stopped*,
_so the best doctors left Austria and emigrated to other countries_.*


*_As for healthcare, our tax rates went up to 80% of our income_.*
Newlyweds immediately received a $1,000 loan from the government to
establish a household. We had big programs for families. All day care
and education were free. High schools were taken over by the government
and college tuition was subsidized. Everyone was entitled to free
handouts, such as food stamps, clothing, and housing.

We had another agency designed to _monitor business_. My brother-in-law
owned a restaurant that had square tables. Government officials told him
he had to replace them with round tables because people might bump
themselves on the corners. Then they said he had to have additional
bathroom facilities. It was just a small dairy business with a snack
bar. He couldn’t meet all the demands. Soon, he went out of business. If
the government owned the large businesses and not many small ones
existed, it could be in control.

We had consumer protection. We were told how to shop and what to buy.
Free enterprise was essentially abolished. We had a planning agency
specially designed for farmers. The agents would go to the farms, count
the live-stock, then tell the farmers what to produce, and how to
produce it.

*“Mercy Killing” Redefined:*

In 1944, I was a student teacher in a small village in the Alps . The
villagers were surrounded by mountain passes which, in the winter, were
closed off with snow, causing people to be isolated. So people
intermarried and offspring were sometimes retarded. When I arrived, I
was told there were 15 mentally retarded adults, but they were all
useful and did good manual work. I knew one, named Vincent, very well.
He was a janitor of the school. One day I looked out the window and saw
Vincent and others getting into a van. I asked my superior where they
were going. She said to an institution where the State Health Department
would teach them a trade, and to read and write. The families were
required to sign papers with a little clause that they could not visit
for 6 months. They were told visits would interfere with the program and
might cause homesickness.

As time passed, letters started to dribble back saying these people died
a natural, merciful death. The villagers were not fooled. We suspected
what was happening. Those people left in excellent physical health and
all died within 6 months. We called this euthanasia.

*The Final Steps - Gun Laws:*

_Next came gun registration. _ People were getting injured by guns.
Hitler said that the real way to catch criminals (we still had a few)
was by matching serial numbers on guns. Most citizens were law abiding
and dutifully marched to the police station to register their firearms.
Not long after-wards, the police said that it was best for everyone to
turn in their guns. The authorities already knew who had them, so it was
futile not to comply voluntarily.

_No more freedom of speech. _ Anyone who said something against the
government was taken away. We knew many people who were arrested, not
only Jews, but also priests and ministers who spoke up.

Totalitarianism didn’t come quickly, _it took 5 years from 1938 until
1943, to realize full dictatorship in Austria . _ Had it happened
overnight, my countrymen would have fought to the last breath. Instead,
we had _creeping_ gradualism. Now, our only weapons were broom handles.
The whole idea sounds almost unbelievable that the state, little by
little eroded our freedom.

_After World War II, Russian troops occupied Austria_ . Women were
raped, preteen to elderly. The press never wrote about this either. When
the Soviets left in 1955, they took everything that they could,
dismantling whole factories in the process. They sawed down whole
orchards of fruit, and what they couldn’t destroy, they burned. We
called it The Burned Earth. Most of the population barricaded themselves
in their houses. Women hid in their cellars for 6 weeks as the troops
mobilized. Those who couldn’t, paid the price. There is a monument in
Vienna today, dedicated to those women who were massacred by the
Russians. This is an eye witness account.

“It’s true….those of us who sailed past the Statue of Liberty came to a
country of unbelievable freedom and opportunity.

*America Truly is the Greatest Country in the World. Don’t Let Freedom
Slip Away*

*_"After America , There is No Place to Go"_*

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Obadiah Shoher <obadiah@...>
Date: Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 3:40 AM
Subject: [Samson Blinded] New world order of rogue nukes
To: obadiah@...


Samson Blinded has posted a new item, 'New world order of rogue nukes'

       The most significant changes slip by imperceptibly. In our case, the
dissolution of the world order started in backwater places few people can
pinpoint on the map: Pakistan and North Korea. Ancient Romans similarly wondered
about the Barbarians who eventually did away with them

       The Pakistani nuclear program broke ground in a way more important than the
military: it was, in a sense, the proverbial garage basement nuke.  The
Pakistani nuclear weapon was devised and implemented by a single man, A.Q. Khan,
without major political support. A.Q. Khan’s nuclear empire was a commercial
enterprise of the same type, though of a different magnitude than Osama Bin
Laden’s nut-selling corporation. Khan received venture financing from the
Saudis in return for the Wahhabites’ share in the nuclear bombs; several are
stored away in Saudi Arabia.  The Americans turned a blind eye to Khan’s
international espionage and his quest for nuclear secrets because the Soviets
openly abetted India in its nuclear development. The British-trained Pakistani
engineers proved capable of producing a bomb despite the Pakistanis’
characteristic dullness. Khan’s lesson is more important to your life than
anything you’ve learned in school: nuclear weapons are technologically simple,
no major financing is required, and they can be produced secretly without a
major country’s sponsorship. In short, nukes are available to terrorists.

       To underscore the point, Khan immediately started selling nuclear technology to
cash customers: Libya, Algeria, Iran, Syria, and North Korea, among others.
Joint efforts by these world outcasts honed an optimal technology: suitable for
low-scale production, highly secretive, inexpensive, and with abundant raw
inputs. In short, reprocessing spent fuel rods from peaceful power stations.
The North Koreans used a small number of outdated centrifuges to harvest
weapons-grade plutonium very slowly, enough for about one bomb a year.  The
Iranians concentrated on developing advanced centrifuges: with the best type,
enough material for a bomb can be harvested in two or three months; unable to
maintain secrecy, the Iranians poured on the speed. Their newest implementation
is plasma-extracting, which allows fuel rods to be reprocessed even in an
apartment.

       Spent rods are buried in many places around the globe, and guarded loosely.
Time and again, intelligence services report intercepting cargos of stolen rods.
Presumably many more slip away. There is no practical way to guard them in
remote places in poor, corrupt countries.

       The NATO pretends to be the leading force in the world, though it has lost even
in tribal Afghanistan. In the meantime, nuclear proliferators are building an
alliance of their own. Pakistan sold nuclear technology to North Korea, which
reciprocated with missile blueprints. Iran supported North Korea with $2 billion
for transferring nuclear know-how to Syria. Iran diversified its nuclear
activities into Venezuela, which also looks for an ostensibly peaceful reactor.
In the most direct challenge to the world’s security, North Korea shipped
weapon-grade uranium to Iran; that’s the closest thing to selling nuclear
bombs. The five or six Korean nuclear bombs are certainly up for sale: the
communists are desperate for cash and could not care less about Western
sanctions or precision bombing. North Korea holds its Southern counterpart
hostage against a major American attack.

       A strike on North Korea cannot succeed because that country hid enough
plutonium and would use the attack as a pretext  to sell it openly. As usual,
tactical approaches exist: one is to bomb the known nuclear facilities and
immediately offer the communists billions of dollars for plutonium; America can
always overbid Iran or the terrorists.

       Tactical solutions cannot solve strategic problems. A.Q. Khan took the djinn of
nuclear secrets out of the bottle, and now too many countries will be developing
nuclear bombs. Some of them will exchange their military potential for aid, but
others will stick to political goals. The development will feed on itself. South
Korea cannot rely on American protection against the nuclear-armed North when
the United States is embroiled in two lost wars and headed by a
negotiations-minded administration. Seeing that America is not eager to save
Israel from nuclear Iran, the South Koreans will proceed to build their own
bombs. So will Japan, which sees North Korea as a rival (quite irrationally,
since the North has no way of conducting a war against Japan). Vietnam cannot
lose its regional dominance to Korea, and will reciprocate with nuclear
development. On another part of the globe, Iranian nukes would spark a nuclear
arms race in the Middle East, pitting nuclear-armed Israel, Syria, and Egypt
against each other. Latin America can nuclearize in a flash: Venezuela first,
then Brazil, Argentina, and then everyone.

       Terrorists need not act alone; a hostile state can hire them. Suppose Syria
decides to nuke Tel Aviv with Iranian bombs, and does so through
Hezbollah—what would Israel do? Probably, nothing. A retaliatory nuclear
strike requires hard evidence, and Syria would deny its involvement, Iran would
claim the uranium was stolen from it, and Lebanon would declare that it does not
bear responsibility for a terrorist group. Retaliation would be still more
problematic if the terrorists used biological weapons: they could use an
advanced Anthrax strain of Russian origin, stolen in Ukraine, modified in Iran,
and received from Syria, which would bet on Israel quarantining Tel Aviv
promptly enough that the epidemic wouldn’t spread to the Golan Heights.

       On the positive side, nuclear weapons are not apocalyptic. Missile defenses are
strong enough, and ground-level explosions are not immensely devastating. Both
Hiroshima and Nagasaki are vibrant towns today despite the fact that their
bombings were much more devastating than any ground-level attack likely to be
perpetrated by terrorists. Human losses in the range of 20,000 people from a
single explosion are not catastrophic. Losses can grow exponentially, though, if
terrorists put their nuclear bomb on a commercial aircraft and detonate before
landing.

       Nuclear proliferation signals the return to the historically standard situation
of the absence of large-scale security, where every man is for himself. For some
centuries, nation-states bought their subjects’ loyalty with promises of
police security and defense against external enemies, often created by the
nation-states themselves. No more. States are a fraud which endangers rather
than protects their citizens.

        The nuclear threat will force sensible people to abandon cities in the
supposition that terrorists won’t expend nuclear bombs on villages. Such a
development would probably take place after one or two bombings.  The
dissolution of the mega-cities would be an extremely positive process which
would bring back the bonds of neighborhood. People will know their neighbors and
exist in culturally homogenous, and thus morally comfortable communities. People
will become more normal, less susceptible to government or consumerist
propaganda and mental conditions. The technology allows for unhindered economic
cooperation through virtual networks.

       In the meantime, the diplomats must be happy to see nuclear proliferation, as
it takes the power out of the hands of their rivals, the military. Leftists love
the crumbling world order, which clears the scene for their great designs.  The
American administration welcomes the countries which lean toward it for
last-resort protection against their nuclear neighbors.

       And so we cannot expect any strong measures against North Korea and Pakistan.

You may view the latest post at
http://samsonblinded.org/blog/new-world-order-of-rogue-nukes.htm

You received this e-mail because you asked to be notified when new updates are
posted.
Best regards,
Obadiah Shoher
obadiah@...