Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
finnswake · Finn's Wake
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want to share photos of your group with the world? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
An Overdue (and Undercooked) Update   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #39 of 42 |
Lots of pots on the old stove, as they say. I’m working hard at the
theater and when I’m not doing that, I’m writing stuff! Yeah, as in,
stuff to read. Like, I mean fiction and things. I know, it’s been a long
while, and I’m overdue. I’m trying to balance that out with some
non-fiction I’m working on; some essays, an introduction or two, a radio
script (hello!) and a book review. But I have to tell you, I’m having a
lot of fun writing the made-up stuff. It’s been grand to stretch those
muscles out and give them a whirl.

Fighting About Howard
August was a busy month. On the Robert E. Howard front, a
discussion-turned-argument became an all-out slapfight, and I was right
in the middle of it. One of the perennial debates in Howard Studies was
the role and importance of L. Sprague de Camp in popularizing Conan and
making him a household name. When it came up again, for the umpteenth
time, it spilled over into two different yahoo groups and prompted one
of scholars to throw up a series of articles on the REHupa blog
(http://www.rehupa.com/?p=250) called The de Camp Controversy. This led
to a comment thread at Conan.com of the same name
(http://www.conan.com/invboard/index.php?showtopic=5976)...and with it
came a continuation of the fight from the yahoo groups.

Well, I was right there in the thick of it, and I contributed a blog
post on the REHupa site, and I was prepared to let it play out on its
own. Then I got wind of the upcoming Underwood Miller book, “And Their
Memory Was a Bitter Tree.” Specifically, I got to see excerpts from the
intro by Arnie Fenner. And I ended up writing a fatwa to him, and this
started a nice little slap fight all by itself:
http://www.thecimmerian.com/?p=1502 . Fenner actually replied to me, and
I was challenged by another de Camp defender, and it all played out in
cyberspace like these things tend to do. You can read replies and
comments here, too: http://www.conan.com/invboard/index.php?showtopic=5870 .

You might ask me why on Earth I would bother? Why on Earth I would care
about something that seems so insignificant. Why make a stink, throw
punches, and create a to-do about something like this? Well, aside from
the reasons stated in my blog entries (which are, I feel, pretty valid),
and aside from the notion that Howard was a Texas writer—THE most
popular Texas writer if we look at the combined total sales of Conan
through the years—and as such, he deserves better, there’s an answer
that has everything to do with Howard being my raison d’être as a writer.

See, when I found REH—Conan, at that—I was twelve years old, angry at
the world, and trying to figure myself out. Between the voice changing,
the divorce and remarrying of both my parents, and the sudden surge of
hostility (testosterone, ladies), I was lost. But when I found these
stories that this guy had written, there was something about the way in
which they were written that made me pay attention to them. The writing,
I mean. Yes, I was taken to other places by the writing. But I was also
able to step back, or at least I tried to, and look at how he put those
words together so that they would snap and crackle in your brain. I read
them aloud, trying to unlock the secret of the magic trick. I started
writing, trying to duplicate the tricks, even as I didn’t fully
understand how they worked.

In the re-reading of Conan through my teen-age years (and also in
finding Howard’s other characters, like Bran Mak Morn and Solomon Kane),
I came to some truths about the world. Some of those truths were cynical
in nature: not everyone gets to be the hero, even if they think they
are. After all of this time, I honestly don’t know if I have a dark
streak in me and that’s what I like about Robert E. Howard, or I have a
dark streak in me because I read Robert E. Howard. It’s a knot I can’t
really undo.

But in all of that philosophical inquiry, and that sifting through
sentences to find the gems that shine long after you’ve closed the book,
and in digging up all of this information about REH and thinking about
how he lived in the time and place that he lived, I found that I had put
him in front of me like a carrot. Howard’s work is, to me, a kind of
gold standard. It’s a measuring stick by which I can examine my own
progress as a writer. I’ve read most of Howard’s stories and a decent
chunk of his poems, and I always read them twice. Once for the sheer joy
of being taken on a ride, and once to see how that ride was accomplished.

This is something that all writers do, I think. We take writing apart
and examine it and try to understand how and why someone used the word
that they did. Sometimes we try to imagine how someone could have
written such a thing. Other times, we think we’ll never be as good as
the sentence we’re marveling over. Most of the time, we’re trying to
strip-mine the writing to extract whatever usable resources we can. But
Howard doesn’t give up his gold so easily. Oh, we can see it, sure, but
taking it for our selves, that’s another story.

Howard was a ferociously clever writer; he was crafty, inventive, a
proficient bullshitter, and the best kind of mercenary wordsmith. He
seldom gilded his lilies, used only the words he needed to use, and did
so with a surgeon’s precision. What’s more, he did it intuitively, off
the cuff, and frequently on the fly. Not all of his stories were written
that way. Some took him multiple drafts. Sometimes, he stopped in the
middle of a story, having lost the muse. Other times, he finished a tale
in a single draft, and it was perfect. It was an artistic way to do
things, even as he himself examined his markets and tried to create
stories that would sell to them. This is how we got Conan, by the way,
and in some ways, it was his best and worst work all at the same time.

All of that aside, I have found over the years that I have increasingly
low tolerance for the people (and there are a shitload of them) who make
a habit of repeating what they have heard, rather than talking about
what they know. While I can’t fix this in everyone, I can do my level
best to correct it regarding Robert E. Howard. He wasn’t crazy. He
wasn’t mad with genius. He didn’t have an “unnaturally close”
relationship with his mother. And none of the above means shit for
shinola regarding his writing. His body of work, all of it, the funny
stuff and the serious stuff, the humor and the horror, the realistic and
the fantastic—all of it—was a part of Howard. Not his mother, not his
father (especially not his father), not his situation, none of it. He
was fiercely individualistic about himself, and for a man who had little
control over his personal situation, he kept a tight grip on his writing
career.

So when people like de Camp, Fenner, and all of the others, start
talking about Howard like they know what made him tick—when in fact,
they know less than that, since they have not examined closely the
substance of his life or his art, it makes me want to punch something.
It’s frustrating that most people are informed about Howard by a guy who
was as far removed from Robert E. Howard himself in temperament and
personality as Bozo the Clown was to William S. Burroughs. It’s retarded
(not lame, but rather, slow and backwards) to think that de Camp’s
insights, such as they were, had any basis in fact, since he got most of
his information from the town gossip.

Bear in mind that I’m not saying I’m the only person who “gets” Howard,
or that I’m the only one qualified to speak about him, but I know this
much: the people who call Conan an overgrown juvenile delinquent haven’t
read Conan at all, or if they have, it was a skim rather than a read. I
know that the people who judge Howard the man by the twenty one Conan
stories he wrote (not even one tenth of his total fiction output) might
as well judge Ambrose Bierce by the story “An Occurrence At Owl Creek”
and nothing else, which makes absolutely no sense, either. And I know
that no one wants to discuss the real flaws in Howard, nor the real
tragedies in his life, because they aren’t as sensational as the town
gossip. I know well the “Liberty Valence” sentiment that states, “When
the legend becomes fact, print the legend.” The people that do that to
Howard do more harm than good. I’m not asking anyone to see what I see;
I’m just asking people to see for themselves.

I’m almost 38 years old now, and that number doesn’t seem so terrible
until I realize that I’m eight years older than Howard ever was, and
that he had written a lifetime’s worth of stories and poems in just
twelve short years. At this point in my career, I’ve inextricably tied
myself to Howard as someone who knows something about him, and can speak
with some authority about him and his work. So, I will continue to
defend Howard in print, for the simple reason that he can’t do it
himself. My goal will be for him to one day be recognized for the
genius he was, with no conditional qualifiers attached.

The Gang’s All Here
After the second Clockwork Storybook Retreat this year, it was decided
that we would get the band back together. Not to go on tour, but rather
to help each other out with our solo projects. So, while not jamming
together, we ARE jamming. You can check out the remodeled Fabletown
boards, now that the five of us are represented. Old Clockwork Storybook
fans, you’ll get a kick out of the story I’ve posted in my section. It’s
right up your alley. Check out www.clockworkstorybook.net (and no, the
old animation isn’t up and running...yet).

Other Stuff
I won’t be attending World Fantasy this year, because of the exorbitant
cost of flying to Canada. However, next year’s WFC is in San Jose, and
so I will be doing that. I’m also making plans to be at San Diego next
year, and I’ve got a trip to NYC on the books. In addition, I’m trying
to expand my regional convention appearances next year. We’ll see how it
all goes. Now what I really need is some sales to help offset those
costs. I’ve got projects and proposals out, and I’m waiting on a short
story to come back from where I sent it so that I can send it back out
again. You know the drill.

It’s been good to start that writing process again. It’s helping to
distract me from the massive falling off of our theater business due to
high school football. We’re not out of the woods yet. If we can last one
more year of this, we’ll be all right. Everyone keep your fingers
crossed for us, and if you want to come up to see a movie, email me
ahead of time so that we can have something good to show you.

Thanks for reading, for your support, and for your love.

Mark




Thu Sep 4, 2008 11:35 pm

markdfinn
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #39 of 42 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Lots of pots on the old stove, as they say. I’m working hard at the theater and when I’m not doing that, I’m writing stuff! Yeah, as in, stuff to read....
Mark Finn
markdfinn
Offline Send Email
Sep 4, 2008
11:35 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help