There's a couple of reasons I'm being picky. First, not everyone
knows that others treat Symantic and Norton as synonyms and may get
confused. After all, it doesn't say "Norton" anywhere on the product.
Second, whenever "Norton" is mentioned, it's not too infrequent that
someone will start off on a rant about horrible experiences they've
had with the product. When questioned, it turns out the product they
are talking about is indeed "Norton" and not Symantec. Last, while
FHCs are moving off of Symantec, there has been no such announcement
for the Administrative computer side. So those of us who are Stake
Technology Specilists, still deal with Symantec.

On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Gary Templeman<gtempleman1@...> wrote:
> I think the OP was using Norton more generically, kind of like the way we
> use the term Kleenex. While that was technically incorrect and not very
> precise, the point is that the old program is being replaced. What we call
> it is not very relevant anymore.
>
> Gary
>