At 09:25 PM 7/5/2008, you wrote:

>Edupunk's not dead!
>
>Michael, Bee, I've heard you can recognise edupunks because their computers
>have mohicans on the screens and safety pins piercing their keyboards.

My New Homepage - http://flickr.com/photos/mikecogh/2639006404/

- M

----------


>Actually I agree with you both - the idea brought a smile to my face,
>though.
>
>What next, I wonder? Edumods? Edurappers?
>
>Graham
>
>On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 3:09 AM, Michael Coghlan
><<mailto:michaelc%40chariot.net.au>michaelc@...>
>wrote:
>
> > I'm with you Bee. I'm giving 'edupunk' a wide berth. Not quite sure
> > why, but instinctively I don't like it. I think it's got something to
> > do with something I care for being labelled with a term that will
> > alienate many, rather than invite people in. As we've all written
> > here many times, it's hard enough to get people involved in edutech
> > without marginalising labels putting them off.
> >
> > - Michael
> >
> >
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
>Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.4.5/1535 - Release Date:
>7/4/2008 5:03 PM


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]