Mildly off-topic, but since I haven't heard back from Lisa (and she might just
be busy; I only sent my initial inquiry on Friday) I thought I would try here.
In Lisa's article on this page
(http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Parthenon/9902/runegond.html), she displays
charts of the Runes of Gondolin, but it is unclear from the accompanying text
whether these pages were something she or perhaps Doug Nolan transcribed or if
this is an actual facsimile of Tolkien's original hand written page. Anyone have
any idea? Thanks in advance for any help you all might be able to render.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
I haven't seen Lisa Star around for years now, and even years ago when
I tried a number of different email addresses she's used some months
apart, I never received a reply. I have heard a similar tale from some
others - I am not sure whether she has simply left the Arkastarin
venue, but it does not surprise me to hear she did not respond to your
email either. It would be nice to be proven wrong, though!
Now, moving onto the topic of the Gondolinic Runes: the page given on
the site you linked to is not a facsimile of Tolkien's original page,
but rather something Lisa Star herself transcribed into a more
calligraphic form. Compare how she wrote out herself the examples for
the tengwar numerals rather than reproduce what was given in Quettar.
The original facsimile of the G. runes by Tolkien, _and_ a script
version of them which she doesn't represent or mention, can be found
in the section entitled 'Early Runic Documents' in issue #15 of the
journal 'Parma Eldalamberon'. Apparently the runic facsimile (but not
the script) is also found and analyzed / commented upon in Mythlore
#69-70, but as I do not have those Mythlore issues I cannot compare.
--- In elfling@yahoogroups.com, "Charles Gadda" <cagadda@...> wrote:
>
> Mildly off-topic, but since I haven't heard back from Lisa (and she
might just be busy; I only sent my initial inquiry on Friday) I
thought I would try here.
>
> In Lisa's article on this page
(http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Parthenon/9902/runegond.html), she
displays charts of the Runes of Gondolin, but it is unclear from the
accompanying text whether these pages were something she or perhaps
Doug Nolan transcribed or if this is an actual facsimile of Tolkien's
original hand written page. Anyone have any idea? Thanks in advance
for any help you all might be able to render.
>
> In Lisa's article on this page ([...]), she displays charts of the
> Runes of Gondolin, but it is unclear from the accompanying
> text whether these pages were something she or perhaps
> Doug Nolan transcribed or if this is an actual facsimile of
> Tolkien's original hand written page. Anyone have any idea?
I do not know for a positive fact; however, I would say it's pretty unlikely
this is an actual facsimile. First of all, from what I know of Tolkien's
handwriting, this specimen does not look like it to me (though I've been wrong
once or twice). Second, the quality of the paper and ink look much too
well-preserved to me to be original. Third, the illustration at the bottom of
the second page doesn't look like it was made by Tolkien. My guess is it's a
copy/transcription.
Just my two cents. Anyone else?
Jason
Thanks for the replies. I was particularly interested in that little drawing of
Glamdring. I had hoped it was Tolkien's own work (or at least directly copied
from it) but that does not appear to be the case. In an early Vinyar Tengwar Tom
Loback did a very similar looking sword (in this case Aranruth) - I had hoped
Tom's sword was a copy of an original Tolkienian squiggle, but it looks like
that's not the case.
Too bad.
As for Lisa's site, I noticed that most of the articles had not been updated in
several years, though curiously the main site indicated that it had been updated
back in March of this year. I hope all is well.
----- Original Message -----
From: Jason Fisher
To: elfling@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 6:51 AM
Subject: [elfling] Re: Regarding Lisa Star's Gondolinic Runes charts
> In Lisa's article on this page ([...]), she displays charts of the
> Runes of Gondolin, but it is unclear from the accompanying
> text whether these pages were something she or perhaps
> Doug Nolan transcribed or if this is an actual facsimile of
> Tolkien's original hand written page. Anyone have any idea?
I do not know for a positive fact; however, I would say it's pretty unlikely
this is an actual facsimile. First of all, from what I know of Tolkien's
handwriting, this specimen does not look like it to me (though I've been wrong
once or twice). Second, the quality of the paper and ink look much too
well-preserved to me to be original. Third, the illustration at the bottom of
the second page doesn't look like it was made by Tolkien. My guess is it's a
copy/transcription.
Just my two cents. Anyone else?
Jason
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]