Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
election-methods-list
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want to share photos of your group with the world? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
  Newest  |  < Newer  |  Older >  |  Oldest
Topics   (List as Individual Messages) Messages Latest Post

Mailing list removal confirmation notice for mailing list Election-methods We have received a request for the removal of your email address, ...
1 Mar 2, 2005
4:19 pm

election-methods-elec...
election-methods-elec...
Send Email

Hi everyone, After making repeated attempts to contact Yahoo, with no response, I'm shutting down the Yahoo Groups access to the election-methods-list. A...
1 May 16, 2004
11:32 pm

Rob Lanphier
robla@...
Send Email

I forgot to mention: There were 9 ballots posted, in February & March of this year, for the EM presidential poll. If that doesn't sound like much, it's a lot...
1 May 16, 2004
11:02 pm

MIKE OSSIPOFF
nkklrp@...
Send Email

In the EM presidential poll that we voted on in February and March of this year, Nader won the Approval count. Nader was the only candidate to receive Approval...
1 May 16, 2004
10:41 pm

MIKE OSSIPOFF
nkklrp@...
Send Email

The "majority winner" that IRVers so often boast of will often have another candidtate preferred to hir by a majority. Avoidably choosing someone in violation...
16 May 16, 2004
10:32 pm

James Gilmour
jgilmour@...
Send Email

I would like to submit to the consideration of the EM list a paper that I've written recently in connection with election methods. I have made it available in ...
1 May 16, 2004
9:16 pm

Xavier Mora
puffinet@...
Send Email

Hi, I've been reading the list for a couple weeks. I got into voting theory a couple years ago after reading a Science News article. It described IRV and I...
3 May 16, 2004
5:31 pm

Kevin Venzke
stepjak@...
Send Email

Here's some ideas for methods using the limit distribution of some Markov chain to find the winner. The idea is to move through the set of options, making...
3 May 16, 2004
3:27 pm

bql@...
Send Email

In Laslier's nice book on tournament solutions I found a characterization of the Banks set and of Schwartz' "tournament equilibrium set" by a "contestation...
1 May 16, 2004
10:41 am

Jobst Heitzig
heitzig-j@...
Send Email

Hopefully this will be helpful to someone: http://bolson.org/voting/vote_form.html Submit a bunch of votes and it will be tallied according to ...
1 May 16, 2004
7:39 am

bql@...
Send Email

Hi, it's James. I haven't been keeping up with the list much lately, but I just wanted to respond to some of the recent discussion regarding a proxy direct...
3 May 16, 2004
4:57 am

James Green-Armytage
jarmyta@...
Send Email

Kurt-- You wrote: The problem with a pure proxy setup, however, is that there is a disincentive for anyone to adopt the duties of a super-proxy. Time, and...
5 May 16, 2004
2:48 am

Curt Siffert
siffert@...
Send Email

The automatic equal ranking line option (AERLO) of course only gives its protection to the above-line candidates. And so if NES &/or DSV, in one of their...
2 May 16, 2004
12:20 am

Jobst Heitzig
heitzig-j@...
Send Email

Has anyone counted the presidential poll that we voted on in February & March of this year? Several people strongly protested that I'd incorrectly added an "e"...
2 May 15, 2004
9:34 pm

Rob Speer
rspeer@...
Send Email

... Well said! One of the attributes with IRV by supporters is that it shows depth of support. What it does *not* show is depth of enmity. Given three...
61 May 15, 2004
7:57 am

Curt Siffert
siffert@...
Send Email

Alex-- You wrote: Probably the most significant difference between my definition and yours is that you focus on the incentives facing a single voter given all...
1 May 15, 2004
5:45 am

MIKE OSSIPOFF
nkklrp@...
Send Email

In my previous posting, I meant Mn(Mn-1(Mn-2(...(M1(M0)))...) _________________________________________________________________ Stop worrying about overloading...
1 May 15, 2004
4:29 am

MIKE OSSIPOFF
nkklrp@...
Send Email

I'd like to name the properties that I asked for in a posting the other day: Strong SFC is SFC with the clause "If no one falsifies a preference..." removed. ...
1 May 15, 2004
4:22 am

MIKE OSSIPOFF
nkklrp@...
Send Email

I have nothing against the grand jury approach to representation. It has some important advantages, which include: 1. No campaign contributions, which means: ...
1 May 15, 2004
4:07 am

MIKE OSSIPOFF
nkklrp@...
Send Email

Bart, ... CB: Oops! You are right, I didn't count the 49 B>C>A ballots as non-last votes for C. In this example, Plurality Criterion only says "not A". I...
1 May 13, 2004
2:28 pm

Chris Benham
chrisbenham@...
Send Email

I'd said: Fairly recently messages have been posted here about IRV proposals for ... Mr. Clark replied: I assume you're referring to the proposal discussed on...
24 May 13, 2004
6:33 am

Bart Ingles
bartman@...
Send Email

Just spotted this comment on the wikipedia and wanted see what others might say about this... Talk:Spoiler effect http://tinyurl.com/2wj3l IRV isn't free from...
10 May 12, 2004
8:13 pm

Markus Schulze
markus.schulze@...
Send Email

Alex-- You wrote: ERBucklin probably does pass weak FBC (the version that allows ranking somebody equal to your favorite) I reply: Yes, at least when FBC is...
2 May 12, 2004
7:03 am

Alex Small
asmall@...
Send Email

Forest-- You wrote: But then he [Mike] goes on to say that Direct Democracy (DD) is on the verge of making PR obsolete. I reply: No, I said, or at least meant,...
2 May 12, 2004
4:24 am

Curt Siffert
siffert@...
Send Email

Stepwise AERLO (SA) option: If any voters choose this option, then repeated AERLO trials are done. Each AERLO trial consists of two counts, an initial count...
1 May 12, 2004
3:28 am

MIKE OSSIPOFF
nkklrp@...
Send Email

In a recent message Mike Ossipoff made the (uncontroversial) assertion that we will always need single winner methods, even if Proportional Representation...
1 May 12, 2004
12:31 am

Forest Simmons
fsimmons@...
Send Email

Participants, ... I reply: IRV meets Mutual Majority (what Woodall calls "Majority"). It implies Majority Favourite and Condorcet Loser (which of course ...
2 May 10, 2004
6:19 am

Bart Ingles
bartman@...
Send Email

I've said that ERBucklin(whole) passes Strong FBC, while Alex said that only Reverse Plurality passes it. Aside from the fact that I didn't prove my ...
2 May 10, 2004
3:19 am

Alex Small
asmall@...
Send Email

Jeff O'Neil said: To be specific, Merrill's simulations show that IRV is much better than PR. Merrill is fairly supportive of IRV in his book. I reply: As has...
1 May 10, 2004
2:26 am

MIKE OSSIPOFF
nkklrp@...
Send Email

Someone wrote: I'm wondering what the verdict is on using Borda as the tie breaker for deciding within the Schwartz Set. Some of the strongest Condorcet ...
1 May 10, 2004
2:01 am

MIKE OSSIPOFF
nkklrp@...
Send Email
  Newest  |  < Newer  |  Older >  |  Oldest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help