Skip to search.

Breaking News Visit Yahoo! News for the latest.

×Close this window

cw_bugs · CW BUGS

The Yahoo! Groups Product Blog

Check it out!

Group Information

  • Members: 268
  • Category: Shortwave
  • Founded: Oct 21, 2006
  • Language: English
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Message search is now enhanced, find messages faster. Take it for a spin.

Messages

Advanced
Messages Help
Messages 1516 - 1545 of 1895   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Show Message Summaries Sort by Date ^  
#1516 From: "Fred Maas" <just.one.hill@...>
Date: Sun Dec 5, 2010 8:00 pm
Subject: any Vibroplex Norcross owners?
just.one.hill@...
Send Email Send Email
 
Anyone on here own a Vibroplex with a Norcross label (with whom I have not already spoken)?  I am seeking to gather serials of known specimens, and photos.  I am happy to share that with other owners who are interested in such.  Also, would be pleased to make a two-way Norcross bug QSO.
 
73,  Fred - kt5x
 
 

#1517 From: "NAQCC" <va3rj@...>
Date: Mon Dec 13, 2010 12:44 am
Subject: NAQCC Sprint Tuesday night!
va3rj
Send Email Send Email
 
NAQCC Sprint Tuesday night!

Our December sprint is this coming Tuesday evening local time which is Wednesday
0130-0330z time.

I will refer you to the proper URL:

http://home.windstream.net/yoel/sprint201011.html

There you will find all the details as to time, frequencies and also a special
prize.

This month's Special Prize goes to the winner, to be decided by drawing among
all who submit a valid log, gets a choice of paddle handles, straight key knobs,
and/or K2 knob inserts donated by Gregg WB8LZG.

This is a monthly event that caters to the CW veteran, the CW newcomer, straight
key and bug fans. All are welcome to participate (this includes QRO); but you
must use QRP power levels to compete for awards.

If you are not already a member of NAQCC... membership is FREE!  Just sign up on
the NAQCC website and you will receive a handsome certificate, with your
membership number which is good for life, plus a starter kit.

Come join us and have a real good time!

72/73 de Dave VA3RJ
NAQCC #0004

#1518 From: "mm1ewa" <mm1ewa@...>
Date: Fri Dec 17, 2010 7:15 am
Subject: Brooklyn metal stamping bug
mm1ewa
Send Email Send Email
 
Good day

I'm wanting to buy a Brooklyn metal stamping bug, I'll pay a price that reflexs
condition, I have a number of bugs for trade if need be.

Cheers!

Michael - MM1EWA/KD0LEJ

#1519 From: "Tom" <ac5jh@...>
Date: Thu Dec 23, 2010 1:38 am
Subject: Re: Brooklyn metal stamping bug
ac5jhfox
Send Email Send Email
 
--- In cw_bugs@yahoogroups.com, "mm1ewa" <mm1ewa@...> wrote:
>
> Good day
>
> I'm wanting to buy a Brooklyn metal stamping bug, I'll pay a price that
reflexs condition, I have a number of bugs for trade if need be.
>
> Cheers!
>
> Michael - MM1EWA/KD0LEJ
>
Michael,
I don't have a BMS bug nor have I ever seen one in person. Have you ever
oparated one? I am interested to know if there is any difference in the feel
with the dit spring mounted on the post rather then the spring arm. Good luck in
your serch.
Tom AC5JH

#1520 From: "hfdxer" <hfdxer@...>
Date: Fri Dec 24, 2010 7:30 pm
Subject: Re: Brooklyn metal stamping bug
hfdxer
Send Email Send Email
 
--- In cw_bugs@yahoogroups.com, "Tom" <ac5jh@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In cw_bugs@yahoogroups.com, "mm1ewa" <mm1ewa@> wrote:
> >
> > Good day
> >
> > I'm wanting to buy a Brooklyn metal stamping bug, I'll pay a price that
reflexs condition, I have a number of bugs for trade if need be.
> >
> > Cheers!
> >
> > Michael - MM1EWA/KD0LEJ
> >
> Michael,
> I don't have a BMS bug nor have I ever seen one in person. Have you ever
oparated one? I am interested to know if there is any difference in the feel
with the dit spring mounted on the post rather then the spring arm. Good luck in
your serch.
> Tom AC5JH
>
I have that I had 20 some years Speed -Bug(BMS), but way too fast for me. I
think I'm hanging on to it. Made very nice. This the  only one I seen. I think
someone in Arizona may have one.
Take care
Railroad

#1521 From: "NAQCC" <va3rj@...>
Date: Mon Dec 27, 2010 10:44 pm
Subject: Special NAQCC mW Sprint Wednesday evening!
va3rj
Send Email Send Email
 
Our December Special NAQCC mW Sprint will be held this coming Wednesday evening
local time which is Thursday, December 30, 0130-0330Z time.

I will refer you to the proper URL:

http://naqcc.info/sprint201012mw.html

There you will find all the details as to time, frequencies and other important
information.

Power: 999 mW or less to be eligible for any awards or prizes. Others welcome to
participate and submit check logs.

Certificates: SWA (simple wire antennas) certificates by call area, VE, DX, and
if anyone has a 160M gain antenna, a certificate in the GAIN category as well.

This is a special sprint, for the month of December, that caters to the CW
veteran, the CW newcomer, straight key and bug fans. All are welcome to
participate, even QRO!

Come join us and have a real good time!

73 de Dave VA3RJ
NAQCC #0004

#1522 From: "Larry Makoski" <w2lj@...>
Date: Sun Jan 16, 2011 3:28 pm
Subject: RFTB Tonight
w2lj@...
Send Email Send Email
 
Tonight is the first RFTB for 2011.

I hope that all Flying Pigs and QRPers will take this opportunity to get on the
air and have some fun.  Maybe if we heat up the ionosphere enough, the cold
weather will take the hint and scram!

The time is the same as always:

East coast - 9:00 to 11:00 PM local time
Midwest - 8:00 to 10:00 PM local time
Rockies - 7:00 to 9:00 PM local time
West coast - 6:00 to 8:00 PM local time

The rules are at:

http://www.fpqrp.com/fpqrprun.php

73 de Larry W2LJ
FP# 612
QRP ARCI# 4488

#1523 From: "NAQCC" <va3rj@...>
Date: Mon Jan 17, 2011 3:47 pm
Subject: NAQCC Sprint Wednesday night!
va3rj
Send Email Send Email
 
NAQCC Sprint Wednesday night!

Our January sprint is this coming Wednesday evening local time which, is
Thursday, January 20, 0130-0330z time.

I will refer you to the proper URL:

http://naqcc.info/sprint201101.html

There you will find all the details as to time, frequencies and other important
information.

Certificates: SWA (simple wire antennas) certificates by call area, VE, DX, and
if anyone has a 160M gain antenna, a certificate in the GAIN category as well.

Prizes: ARRL Operating Manual (2 - 4th edition 1993 and 7th edition 2002),
awarded by 2 random drawings from all those who submit a log for a sprint from
January 1, 2011 to February 28, 2011 and March 1, 2011 to April 30, 2011. Winner
of the first drawing gets his/her choice of the two and is not eligible for the
second drawing. Winners to be announced.

This is a monthly event that caters to the CW veteran, the CW newcomer, straight
key and bug fans. All are welcome to participate (this includes QRO); but you
must use QRP power levels to compete for awards.

If you are not already a member of NAQCC... membership is FREE!  Just sign up on
the NAQCC website and you will receive a handsome certificate, with your
membership number which is good for life, plus a starter kit.

Come join us and have a real good time!

72/73 de Dave VA3RJ
NAQCC #0004

#1524 From: Earl Needham <earl.kd5xb@...>
Date: Wed Jan 19, 2011 1:47 am
Subject: Click to view.
earl_needham
Send Email Send Email
 

hello
Just a couple of days ago we bought an  Apple MacBook Pro MC024LL/Afrom ! this website:  www.xmaswholesalers.com .
It is indeed a fantastic machine, though it will take some time to get used to the new system.  Wireles mouse and keyboard. Nice design.
and I love it. I paid $1260US all charges included   the chose to use the Core 2 Duo but that's not all bad. This is a stable, cool running, capable processor.   I use this mostly for work where stability, battery life, portability, and longevity are the most important things to me. I rarely play games. I especially like the backlit keyboard.   if you want to get one. you can check it out .

hope you had a happy holiday....

Regards,

Earl Needham


#1525 From: "earl_needham" <earl.kd5xb@...>
Date: Wed Jan 19, 2011 11:36 pm
Subject: Re: Click to view.
earl_needham
Send Email Send Email
 
Ah -- NO!  This is trojan/spam/virus, so do NOT click on that link!

Earl


--- In cw_bugs@yahoogroups.com, Earl Needham <earl.kd5xb@...> wrote:
>
> hello
> Just a couple of days ago we bought an  Apple MacBook Pro MC024LL/Afrom !
> this website:  www.xmaswholesalers.com .
> It is indeed a fantastic machine, though it will take some time to get used
> to the new system.  Wireles mouse and keyboard. Nice design.
> and I love it. I paid $1260US all charges included   the chose to use the
> Core 2 Duo but that's not all bad. This is a stable, cool running, capable
> processor.   I use this mostly for work where stability, battery life,
> portability, and longevity are the most important things to me. I rarely
> play games. I especially like the backlit keyboard.   if you want to get
> one. you can check it out .
>
> hope you had a happy holiday....
>
> Regards,
>
> Earl Needham
>

#1526 From: cw_bugs@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thu Jan 20, 2011 2:35 am
Subject: New file uploaded to cw_bugs
cw_bugs@yahoogroups.com
Send Email Send Email
 
Hello,

This email message is a notification to let you know that
a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the cw_bugs
group.

   File        : /BugNapper 6.pdf
   Uploaded by : richard_meiss <wb9lpu@...>
   Description : Another approach to slowing a bug

You can access this file at the URL:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cw_bugs/files/BugNapper%206.pdf

To learn more about file sharing for your group, please visit:
http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/groups/original/members/web/index.html
Regards,

richard_meiss <wb9lpu@...>

#1527 From: "richard_meiss" <wb9lpu@...>
Date: Thu Jan 20, 2011 2:55 am
Subject: Another way to slow a bug
richard_meiss
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi, All -

      As usual, I am a day late and a dollar short for the discussion on ways to
slow a bug, but herewith is what has just come out of the workshop.  In the
"Files" section of the group I have uploaded a description of this new approach
to slowing down a bug into a speed range that is more accessible to many hams
that you meet on the air. There are also a couple of photos in the "Photos"
section that are taken from the write-up. A YouTube movie of the device in
operation is being prepared.

      I have called the device the BugNapper, because all of the better
names, like BugTamer, were taken. Please let me know if this term has been used
by someone else - my XYL has come up with a few names is this one is taken.

      73 de Rich, WB9LPU

#1528 From: "Earl Needham" <earl.kd5xb@...>
Date: Thu Jan 20, 2011 3:01 am
Subject: Re: Another way to slow a bug
earl_needham
Send Email Send Email
 
Looks interesting, wish I had time to really study it.

7 3
Earl

KD5XB -- Earl Needham http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cw_bugs Quoting from the Coast Guard: ZUT Posted via Blackberry


From: "richard_meiss" <wb9lpu@...>
Sender: cw_bugs@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 02:55:19 -0000
To: <cw_bugs@yahoogroups.com>
ReplyTo: cw_bugs@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [cw_bugs] Another way to slow a bug

 

Hi, All -

As usual, I am a day late and a dollar short for the discussion on ways to slow a bug, but herewith is what has just come out of the workshop. In the "Files" section of the group I have uploaded a description of this new approach to slowing down a bug into a speed range that is more accessible to many hams that you meet on the air. There are also a couple of photos in the "Photos" section that are taken from the write-up. A YouTube movie of the device in operation is being prepared.

I have called the device the BugNapper, because all of the better
names, like BugTamer, were taken. Please let me know if this term has been used by someone else - my XYL has come up with a few names is this one is taken.

73 de Rich, WB9LPU


#1529 From: "k5est" <k5est@...>
Date: Thu Jan 20, 2011 2:02 pm
Subject: Re: Another way to slow a bug
k5est
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi Rich, very interesting BugNapper! Its
nice but toooo much trouble for me to do all
that stuff. Been using wooded clothes pins for
30 years to slow down a bug.....or just switch
to a straight key.....grin!
73....Walter - K5EST - Missouri


--- In cw_bugs@yahoogroups.com, "richard_meiss" <wb9lpu@...> wrote:
>>      I have called the device the BugNapper, because all of the

#1530 From: Richard Meiss <wb9lpu@...>
Date: Thu Jan 20, 2011 3:32 pm
Subject: Re: Re: Another way to slow a bug
richard_meiss
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi, Walter -

     Whatever works for you is best.  This was something that has been running around in my mind for some time, and I just had to try it out.  Yes, it is more complicated than the more direct methods, but it was fun to work out the physics.  Especially since I've been playing with magnets and springs most of my life.
     But your way is also quite effective - as a matter of fact, you can just use the dash paddle and skip the straight key altogether! 
     So, to each his own.  Hope to work you on the air someday.

     73 de Rich, WB9LPU





-----Original Message-----
From: k5est
Sent: Jan 20, 2011 9:02 AM
To: cw_bugs@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [cw_bugs] Re: Another way to slow a bug

 

Hi Rich, very interesting BugNapper! Its
nice but toooo much trouble for me to do all
that stuff. Been using wooded clothes pins for
30 years to slow down a bug.....or just switch
to a straight key.....grin!
73....Walter - K5EST - Missouri

--- In cw_bugs@yahoogroups.com, "richard_meiss" <wb9lpu@...> wrote:
>> I have called the device the BugNapper, because all of the


#1531 From: Tony Morgan <1desertdweller@...>
Date: Fri Jan 21, 2011 1:47 am
Subject: Slow Down Vibroplex
w7go
Send Email Send Email
 
#1532 From: "richard_meiss" <wb9lpu@...>
Date: Fri Jan 21, 2011 2:19 am
Subject: Re: Slow Down Vibroplex
richard_meiss
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi, Tony -

      I met this fellow (at least I think that was the same person) at the Fort
Wayne (IN) Hamfest in November.  He had some samples there, and they were nicely
finished and worked well, and he was willing to "talk shop".
      Actually, its hard for the mass/extension approach not to work.  What may
make a difference for some folks how "finished" it looks and how easy is it to
adjust (and whether it requires any permanent changes to the bug).  This device
passes all these tests.

      73 de Rich, WB9LPU

--- In cw_bugs@yahoogroups.com, Tony Morgan <1desertdweller@...> wrote:
>
> Just ran across this on ebay:
>
>
http://cgi.ebay.com/Slow-Down-Vibroplex-Telegraph-Key-Morse-Code-Ham-Radio-/1206\
73220026?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item1c18af35ba
>
> Anyone care to comment on this item?
>
> 73,
>
> Tony W7GO
>

#1533 From: "TroyW6HV" <w6hv@...>
Date: Fri Jan 21, 2011 2:43 am
Subject: Re: Slow Down Vibroplex
w6hv
Send Email Send Email
 
You can make your own very easily using brass rod and brass tubing from a
hobby shop for very little cost. I have several on my bugs. I have a picture
of one I made in the photo section.

73,
Troy, W6HV

-----Original Message-----
From: Tony Morgan
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 5:47 PM
To: cw_bugs@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [cw_bugs] Slow Down Vibroplex

Just ran across this on ebay:

http://cgi.ebay.com/Slow-Down-Vibroplex-Telegraph-Key-Morse-Code-Ham-Radio-/1206\
73220026?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item1c18af35ba

Anyone care to comment on this item?

73,

Tony W7GO






------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

#1534 From: Pete Ferrand <petef@...>
Date: Fri Jan 21, 2011 3:11 am
Subject: Re: Slow Down Vibroplex
cr88a
Send Email Send Email
 
>From: TroyW6HV <w6hv@...>
>Sent: Jan 20, 2011 8:43 PM

>You can make your own very easily using brass rod and brass tubing from a

I made one as well out of a common electrical grounding bar. Cheap and the
screws are included. Just cut a couple pieces off the aluminum bar. I used a
knitting needle for the extra shaft but peg hooks (for hanging stuff on a
perforated board) can be cut down and work great.

See the photo album under my call.

73,
-Pete
WB2QLL

#1535 From: wz4cw@...
Date: Fri Jan 21, 2011 10:29 pm
Subject: Re: Slow Down Vibroplex
ares1934
Send Email Send Email
 


This device seems to be similar to the "Extend-A-Dot" bug slower.  To increase the period of oscillation of a bug pendulum, either more weight can be added to the pendulum, or weight can be moved farther away from the pivot point, or both.  This device accomplishes that, so it should work well.  The only slight negative is that any device that attaches to the pendulum rod with a "set screw" has the possibility of marring the pendulum rod.  Note: Most Vibroplex weight screws have a nylon tip or a rounded tip.

Carl  WZ4CW  
73     SKCC 918     FISTS 13491

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tony Morgan" <1desertdweller@...>
To: "cw bugs" <cw_bugs@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 8:47:05 PM
Subject: [cw_bugs] Slow Down Vibroplex

 


#1536 From: wz4cw@...
Date: Fri Jan 21, 2011 11:08 pm
Subject: Re: Another way to slow a bug
ares1934
Send Email Send Email
 

     I've examined the write up and photos of this device, and to me BugNapper seems to be pure genious.  It's obvious that it will slow the oscillation of a bug.  The thing that makes it so inovative, is that it can be adjusted quickly and easily.   By simply turning a screw, the speed can be adjusted any amount, faster or slower.  Fantastic.

 

     Now to speak more about "slowing" a bug.  Some people feel that to slow a bug "everything" must be slowed.  Instead of the bug operating at say 20-25 WPM, by adding weight, it is slowed to 10 WPM for example.  The effect of this is that while the overall speed is 10 WPM, the "character" speed is also 10 WPM.  This may not be the best way to "learn" and to "send" CW. 

 

     Other people are of the opinion that while the overall speed needs to be slowed, the character speed should remain in the vicinity of 20 WPM.  To achieve an overall speed reduction, the "spaces" between characters and words are lengthened to give the overall speed desired.   If this method of "slowing" is followed, the effort to slow a bug is greatly diminished since it only needs to be slowed to 20 WPM.  Many people, as well as W1AW code practice, seem to subscribe to this approach. 

 

Pick the method that works for you and Good Luck-    Carl   WZ4CW     

73     SKCC 918     FISTS 13491

----- Original Message -----
From: "richard_meiss" <wb9lpu@...>
To: "cw bugs" <cw_bugs@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 9:55:19 PM
Subject: [cw_bugs] Another way to slow a bug

 

Hi, All -

As usual, I am a day late and a dollar short for the discussion on ways to slow a bug, but herewith is what has just come out of the workshop. In the "Files" section of the group I have uploaded a description of this new approach to slowing down a bug into a speed range that is more accessible to many hams that you meet on the air. There are also a couple of photos in the "Photos" section that are taken from the write-up. A YouTube movie of the device in operation is being prepared.

I have called the device the BugNapper, because all of the better
names, like BugTamer, were taken. Please let me know if this term has been used by someone else - my XYL has come up with a few names is this one is taken.

73 de Rich, WB9LPU


#1537 From: "G2JL" <mort.g2jl@...>
Date: Fri Jan 21, 2011 11:37 pm
Subject: Re: Another way to slow a bug
mort.g2jl
Send Email Send Email
 

To paraphrase Carl ( while the overall speed needs to be slowed, the character speed should remain in the vicinity of 20)  by saying: " IF overall speed needs to be slowed, the character speed should remain in the vicinity of 20" sums it all up completely.   Below about 20 WPM,  Morse tends to become unreadable.  Only very skilled operators can concentrate well enough to read 12 wpm,  which is why The Test was such a challenge in the Bad Old Days !
 
You can't learn to ride a pushbike by riding at 1 mile per hour.  Stage performers can do it,  yes;  but beginners need "steerage way".  Try to learn slow flying,  or low-launch-velocity astronautics ?  Try to learn a foreign language by starting at five syllables per minute ?  Nonsense !
 
I've just got an antique McElroy,  because I want to re-learn buggery.  Do I slow it to 5 wpm ?  Do I buggery !
 
Apologies if some of my linguistic subtleties are too obscure for some of our Overseas Members,  but you are all so good that I tend to forget.  Auf Deutsch,  ich bin schrecklich;  en francais,  dégeulasse.  As for my Greek,  the Greeks have a word for it !
 
QAC de G2JL +

#1538 From: "F. Richard Burt" <BrazosValley@...>
Date: Sun Jan 23, 2011 7:11 pm
Subject: Re: New file uploaded to cw_bugs
effarbee
Send Email Send Email
 
Good Afternoon, Fellow Buggy Hams:
 
My father and I liked to Rag Chew with other hams, even the Novice boys
who were still having trouble with 5 words per minute speeds.  In a pick-up
equipment issue from Texas Army MARS, I obtained my very own Vibroplex bug
for my very own.  The positioning spring was VERY stiff, and the ditttsss
ran way too fast, even with the weight as far out on the pendulum movement
as I could place it.  So, handy man that I can be, sometimes, I thought
about it overnight, and work up from a dead sleep with the "solution."
 
Fetching a fine-toothed metal file from my toolbox, I took careful aim
at the top edge of the spring and filed a notch in the spring.  Then,
I fired up the transmitter and "tested" it.  For semi-automatic keying
at slow words-per-minute, that flat spring was still way too stiff.  So,
I turned the bug over and used my file on what was then the bottom edge
of the spring, (being up-side-down, I could gently press down with each
file-stroke and the amount of vertical mass at that point of the spring
was now beginning to "look" narrow.  Better test again.  The performance
now was quite good for a speed of about 10 words-per-minute speed.  Since
my goal was to bring it down to 5 words-per-minute, I continued to file
the bottom edge of that spring, and tested after each set of about six
strokes of the file. 
 
Sure enough, when I reached the place where the spring was "proper" to
rebulate the ditttssss evenly with the DAHs, the amount of steel left
was visible no more than about 1/8-inch.  Fatigue might be a possibility,
 but this adjustment in physical properties was inexpensive, interesting,
and successful in 1958, and it is still in good shape.
 
Richard Meiss, WB9LPU, your bug is beautifull, ...and shines quite well. 
The Government didn't attempt to protect their stuff.  All it had to do
was work when plugged into a transmitter.  Let me pose my opinion, with
no hands-on experience with your proposed corrective action using magnets.
 
The "natural" feel of the corrective action with my bug has no quirkiness. 
All of the physical properties "slowed" equally as I filed the steel
spring for less top-to-bottom mass.  Just an idea worth consideration,
since I am now a reporting committee of one, uninvited to comment on the
subject. <grins>
 
73s
 
Dick
 
F. Richard Burt
W5QQM
 
Garland, Texas
 
   
 
.
which I think could make placement and regulation of the counter-forces
necessary to compensate for too-rigid a return/restore spring  
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 8:35 PM
Subject: [cw_bugs] New file uploaded to cw_bugs

 


Hello,

This email message is a notification to let you know that
a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the cw_bugs
group.

File : /BugNapper 6.pdf
Uploaded by : richard_meiss <wb9lpu@...>
Description : Another approach to slowing a bug

You can access this file at the URL:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cw_bugs/files/BugNapper%206.pdf

To learn more about file sharing for your group, please visit:
http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/groups/original/members/web/index.html
Regards,

richard_meiss <wb9lpu@...>



#1539 From: "richard_meiss" <wb9lpu@...>
Date: Mon Jan 24, 2011 1:51 am
Subject: Re: New file uploaded to cw_bugs
richard_meiss
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi, Dick -

       I guess that it took a bit more nerve that I have to attack the
mainspring of a bug, especially since it is riveted in place and your
modification was pretty permanent.  But if it worked for you, then it
did its job.  A potential problem with reducing the dimensions of the
spring from the top and bottom is that it reduces the strength of the
spring to bear the downward force of the weight on the pendulum.  One
way around this is to use a Dremel tool with a small abrasive wheel and
remove a "slot" of material from the center of the spring.  This
preserves its width and reduces its lateral stiffness with little effect
on the vertical strength.  But it is still not reversible.

      I took some time to clean up the bug before taking the photographs,
because it is my pride and joy.  My father gave it to me in 1957 as a
combination General license and birthday present.  Actually, he brought
home a Lafayette Radio bug (aka Skillman, "coffin bug", Hi-Mound, etc.).
It was a nice bug in its own right, but my father saw in my face that I
had really had my heart set on a Vibroplex, so he traded it in for one.
It has stayed with me for many moves and escaped being cut down to make
a CW paddle.  To shine it up without damaging the chrome, I used a Mr.
Clean Magic Eraser sponge.  That item leaves no residue and has no
abrasive effect either on the chrome or the crackle finish of the base.
I would be careful about using it on one of the "Japanned" bases of the
older Vibroplexes.

       A YouTube video of the BugNapper is in the works and should be
finished before too long.

       73 de Rich, WB9LPU


--- In cw_bugs@yahoogroups.com, "F. Richard Burt" <BrazosValley@...>
wrote:
>
> Good Afternoon, Fellow Buggy Hams:
>
> My father and I liked to Rag Chew with other hams, even the Novice
boys
> who were still having trouble with 5 words per minute speeds.  In a
pick-up
> equipment issue from Texas Army MARS, I obtained my very own Vibroplex
bug
> for my very own.  The positioning spring was VERY stiff, and the
ditttsss
> ran way too fast, even with the weight as far out on the pendulum
movement
> as I could place it.  So, handy man that I can be, sometimes, I
thought
> about it overnight, and work up from a dead sleep with the "solution."
>
> Fetching a fine-toothed metal file from my toolbox, I took careful aim
> at the top edge of the spring and filed a notch in the spring.  Then,
> I fired up the transmitter and "tested" it.  For semi-automatic keying
> at slow words-per-minute, that flat spring was still way too stiff.
So,
> I turned the bug over and used my file on what was then the bottom
edge
> of the spring, (being up-side-down, I could gently press down with
each
> file-stroke and the amount of vertical mass at that point of the
spring
> was now beginning to "look" narrow.  Better test again.  The
performance
> now was quite good for a speed of about 10 words-per-minute speed.
Since
> my goal was to bring it down to 5 words-per-minute, I continued to
file
> the bottom edge of that spring, and tested after each set of about six
> strokes of the file.
>
> Sure enough, when I reached the place where the spring was "proper" to
> rebulate the ditttssss evenly with the DAHs, the amount of steel left
> was visible no more than about 1/8-inch.  Fatigue might be a
possibility,
>  but this adjustment in physical properties was inexpensive,
interesting,
> and successful in 1958, and it is still in good shape.
>
> Richard Meiss, WB9LPU, your bug is beautifull, ...and shines quite
well.
> The Government didn't attempt to protect their stuff.  All it had to
do
> was work when plugged into a transmitter.  Let me pose my opinion,
with
> no hands-on experience with your proposed corrective action using
magnets.
>
> The "natural" feel of the corrective action with my bug has no
quirkiness.
> All of the physical properties "slowed" equally as I filed the steel
> spring for less top-to-bottom mass.  Just an idea worth consideration,
> since I am now a reporting committee of one, uninvited to comment on
the
> subject. <grins>
>
> 73s
>
> Dick
>
> F. Richard Burt
> W5QQM
>
> Garland, Texas
>
> BrazosValley@...
>
>
> .
> which I think could make placement and regulation of the
counter-forces
> necessary to compensate for too-rigid a return/restore spring
>   ----- Original Message -----
>   From: cw_bugs@yahoogroups.com
>   To: cw_bugs@yahoogroups.com
>   Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 8:35 PM
>   Subject: [cw_bugs] New file uploaded to cw_bugs
>
>
>
>
>   Hello,
>
>   This email message is a notification to let you know that
>   a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the cw_bugs
>   group.
>
>   File : /BugNapper 6.pdf
>   Uploaded by : richard_meiss wb9lpu@...
>   Description : Another approach to slowing a bug
>
>   You can access this file at the URL:
>   http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cw_bugs/files/BugNapper%206.pdf
>
>   To learn more about file sharing for your group, please visit:
>
http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/groups/original/members/web/index.html
>   Regards,
>
>   richard_meiss wb9lpu@...
>

#1540 From: "F. Richard Burt" <BrazosValley@...>
Date: Mon Jan 24, 2011 5:48 am
Subject: Re: Re: New file uploaded to cw_bugs
effarbee
Send Email Send Email
 
Good Morning, Rich, et al:
 
By the time I get this letter into cyberspace, the sun, moon, and
stars will convfirm that it is already Monday somewhere, so I can
say "Good Morning" with a clear head. <grins>
 
Your suggestions about how to relax the spring was a better idea
than what I did with my file.  Good thinking.
 
G'nite, ...or G'mornin'
Dick
 
.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, January 23, 2011 7:51 PM
Subject: [cw_bugs] Re: New file uploaded to cw_bugs

 

Hi, Dick -

I guess that it took a bit more nerve that I have to attack the
mainspring of a bug, especially since it is riveted in place and your
modification was pretty permanent. But if it worked for you, then it
did its job. A potential problem with reducing the dimensions of the
spring from the top and bottom is that it reduces the strength of the
spring to bear the downward force of the weight on the pendulum. One
way around this is to use a Dremel tool with a small abrasive wheel and
remove a "slot" of material from the center of the spring. This
preserves its width and reduces its lateral stiffness with little effect
on the vertical strength. But it is still not reversible.

I took some time to clean up the bug before taking the photographs,
because it is my pride and joy. My father gave it to me in 1957 as a
combination General license and birthday present. Actually, he brought
home a Lafayette Radio bug (aka Skillman, "coffin bug", Hi-Mound, etc.).
It was a nice bug in its own right, but my father saw in my face that I
had really had my heart set on a Vibroplex, so he traded it in for one.
It has stayed with me for many moves and escaped being cut down to make
a CW paddle. To shine it up without damaging the chrome, I used a Mr.
Clean Magic Eraser sponge. That item leaves no residue and has no
abrasive effect either on the chrome or the crackle finish of the base.
I would be careful about using it on one of the "Japanned" bases of the
older Vibroplexes.

A YouTube video of the BugNapper is in the works and should be
finished before too long.

73 de Rich, WB9LPU

--- In cw_bugs@yahoogroups.com, "F. Richard Burt" <BrazosValley@...>
wrote:
>
> Good Afternoon, Fellow Buggy Hams:
>
> My father and I liked to Rag Chew with other hams, even the Novice
boys
> who were still having trouble with 5 words per minute speeds. In a
pick-up
> equipment issue from Texas Army MARS, I obtained my very own Vibroplex
bug
> for my very own. The positioning spring was VERY stiff, and the
ditttsss
> ran way too fast, even with the weight as far out on the pendulum
movement
> as I could place it. So, handy man that I can be, sometimes, I
thought
> about it overnight, and work up from a dead sleep with the "solution."
>
> Fetching a fine-toothed metal file from my toolbox, I took careful aim
> at the top edge of the spring and filed a notch in the spring. Then,
> I fired up the transmitter and "tested" it. For semi-automatic keying
> at slow words-per-minute, that flat spring was still way too stiff.
So,
> I turned the bug over and used my file on what was then the bottom
edge
> of the spring, (being up-side-down, I could gently press down with
each
> file-stroke and the amount of vertical mass at that point of the
spring
> was now beginning to "look" narrow. Better test again. The
performance
> now was quite good for a speed of about 10 words-per-minute speed.
Since
> my goal was to bring it down to 5 words-per-minute, I continued to
file
> the bottom edge of that spring, and tested after each set of about six
> strokes of the file.
>
> Sure enough, when I reached the place where the spring was "proper" to
> rebulate the ditttssss evenly with the DAHs, the amount of steel left
> was visible no more than about 1/8-inch. Fatigue might be a
possibility,
> but this adjustment in physical properties was inexpensive,
interesting,
> and successful in 1958, and it is still in good shape.
>
> Richard Meiss, WB9LPU, your bug is beautifull, ...and shines quite
well.
> The Government didn't attempt to protect their stuff. All it had to
do
> was work when plugged into a transmitter. Let me pose my opinion,
with
> no hands-on experience with your proposed corrective action using
magnets.
>
> The "natural" feel of the corrective action with my bug has no
quirkiness.
> All of the physical properties "slowed" equally as I filed the steel
> spring for less top-to-bottom mass. Just an idea worth consideration,
> since I am now a reporting committee of one, uninvited to comment on
the
> subject. <grins>
>
> 73s
>
> Dick
>
> F. Richard Burt
> W5QQM
>
> Garland, Texas
>
> BrazosValley@...
>
>
> .
> which I think could make placement and regulation of the
counter-forces
> necessary to compensate for too-rigid a return/restore spring
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: cw_bugs@yahoogroups.com
> To: cw_bugs@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 8:35 PM
> Subject: [cw_bugs] New file uploaded to cw_bugs
>
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
> This email message is a notification to let you know that
> a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the cw_bugs
> group.
>
> File : /BugNapper 6.pdf
> Uploaded by : richard_meiss wb9lpu@...
> Description : Another approach to slowing a bug
>
> You can access this file at the URL:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cw_bugs/files/BugNapper%206.pdf
>
> To learn more about file sharing for your group, please visit:
>
http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/groups/original/members/web/index.html
> Regards,
>
> richard_meiss wb9lpu@...
>


#1541 From: "Tom" <mtnest@...>
Date: Mon Jan 24, 2011 2:10 pm
Subject: Sealed magnetic reed switch
n1326e
Send Email Send Email
 
Hello to all,

  I would like to do some experimenting with telegraph keys
incorporating magnets and sealed magnetic reed switches
similar to those used in the beautiful keys designed by group
member Richard Meiss (wb9lpu). I've looked through his
very well done web site explanations but didn't see any
references to the reed switch source/s or p/n.

  Does anyone have a source for the reed switches? I've seen
a few websites but with so many versions to choose from, I'd
sure like some direction before ordering.

  Richard, many many thanks for posting your designs through
photos and explanations, what a treasure!

  Thanks for any help.

    73
    Tom
    W4TMW

#1542 From: "F. Richard Burt" <BrazosValley@...>
Date: Mon Jan 24, 2011 3:01 pm
Subject: Re: Sealed magnetic reed switch
effarbee
Send Email Send Email
 
Good Morning, Tom:
   
CQ  W4TMW de W5QQM K
  
Tom are you anywhere near Montecello Florida?  I have a
long-time ham friend named William Robert Moody, W4WSZ
who is a big DX addict, and, although W4-land is a huge
area, I was just curious if you all were close enough to
actually know each other. <grins>
 
73's  Dick
 
F. Richard Burt
QTH Garland, TX  U.S.A.
W5QQM K
  
I'm an N-scale model railroading addict.  Confession is
good for the soul. <grins>
 
  
.

#1543 From: "richard_meiss" <wb9lpu@...>
Date: Tue Jan 25, 2011 3:01 am
Subject: Re: Sealed magnetic reed switch
richard_meiss
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi, Tom -

     Welcome to the world of magnets and reed switches.  Good rare-earth magnets are available from several places on the web.  I am a customer of  K&J Magnetics (http://www.kjmagnetics.com) and Magcraft (http://www.magcraft.com).  Both of these companies have proved to be fast and reliable.

       Satisfactory reed switches are a bit harder to find.  I have acquired a lot of them at hamfests - the ones that I find the most useful are about 1/2" long and 3/32" in diameter.  One place to find them on the web, or by mail, is at All Electronics (http://www.allelectronics.com/make-a-store/item/RSW-27/SMALL-REED-SWITCH-N.O.//1.html).  Their stock varies from time to time, so I get a bunch of them when they are available.  Some places sell them for use in alarm systems, but these types tend to be pretty large.
      There are a few things to keep in mind when working with the glass-encapsulated reed switches.  They are fragile, so I mount mine in brass tubes (5/32" diameter) for protection.  This size of tube will accept the switch and allow for passage of connecting wires.  The switches are surprisingly tolerant of soldering to the leads, as long as you are quick, but bending the leads (especially near to the switch body) is asking for trouble.
      Some other things to be aware of.  Magnetic reed switches show hysteresis - that is, the point in a magnetic field where they turn on is different from where they turn off (they become slightly magnetized themselves).  This is great for use in bugs, where there is a fair amount of pendulum movement - the hysteresis completely eliminates the "scratchy dits" problem.  But in a straight key or paddle, this can pose a little problem.  If you have a magnet on the key lever, as you push the key down the switch will close at some point (which you can set to be the end of the stroke).  But as the key lever moves back up, the switch will stay closed for a small space.  This means that you might not be able to set the travel distance to be as small as you would want - especially in a paddle.
     The switches also have "hot spots" that you can map by moving a small magnet around them.  The sensitivity falls off with distance differently depending on the hot spot chosen.  I have also found that the switches work predictably as long as the current switched is quite low (as it is with a modern keying circuit).  If you try to switch a higher current, the flowing current changes the characteristics of the switch in a rather unpredictable way.  So if you are trying to key a "boat anchor", a keying relay is in order.
       Most of these properties can be turned to your advantage with careful design.  Best of luck with your experiments, and let us know what develops.

      73 de Rich, WB9LPU


--- In cw_bugs@yahoogroups.com, "Tom" <mtnest@...> wrote:

>
>
> Hello to all,
>
> I would like to do some experimenting with telegraph keys
> incorporating magnets and sealed magnetic reed switches
> similar to those used in the beautiful keys designed by group
> member Richard Meiss (wb9lpu). I've looked through his
> very well done web site explanations but didn't see any
> references to the reed switch source/s or p/n.
>
> Does anyone have a source for the reed switches? I've seen
> a few websites but with so many versions to choose from, I'd
> sure like some direction before ordering.
>
> Richard, many many thanks for posting your designs through
> photos and explanations, what a treasure!
>
> Thanks for any help.
>
> 73
> Tom
> W4TMW
>

#1544 From: "Tom" <mtnest@...>
Date: Tue Jan 25, 2011 3:02 pm
Subject: Re: Sealed magnetic reed switch
n1326e
Send Email Send Email
 
Hello Dick,

    Nope, not in that area, I live in Hartwell, GA. a small town
situated on Lake Hartwell at the headwaters of the Savannah river.

  Also, not aware of Robert, but then I'm only a little guy among
the DX crowd.

    73
    Tom
    W4TMW



--- In cw_bugs@yahoogroups.com, "F. Richard Burt" <BrazosValley@...> wrote:
>
> Good Morning, Tom:
>
> CQ  W4TMW de W5QQM K
>
> Tom are you anywhere near Montecello Florida?  I have a
> long-time ham friend named William Robert Moody, W4WSZ
> who is a big DX addict, and, although W4-land is a huge
> area, I was just curious if you all were close enough to
> actually know each other. <grins>
>
> 73's  Dick
>
> F. Richard Burt
> QTH Garland, TX  U.S.A.
> W5QQM K
>
> I'm an N-scale model railroading addict.  Confession is
> good for the soul. <grins>
>
> BrazosValley@...
>
> .
>

#1545 From: "Tom" <mtnest@...>
Date: Tue Jan 25, 2011 3:21 pm
Subject: Re: Sealed magnetic reed switch
n1326e
Send Email Send Email
 
Good morning Richard,

  Thank you, thank you for all of the excellent info. I'm excited to get going on
this voyage, especially after your comments. I can see now, that I will need to
do some exploring with adjustable parts just as you did when you got into the
magnetic/switching area. Thank goodness I saved many of your photos and
explanations since it was reported that they were all lost during the switchover
to this new group website.

  Yes, I intend to report my progress, but for now it will probably be all
questions. :0)

    73
    Tom
    W4TMW



  "richard_meiss" <wb9lpu@...> wrote:
>
> Hi, Tom -
>
>       Welcome to the world of magnets and reed switches.  Good rare-earth
> magnets are available from several places on the web.  I am a customer
> of  K&J Magnetics (http://www.kjmagnetics.com
> <http://www.kjmagnetics.com/> ) and Magcraft (http://www.magcraft.com
> <http://www.kjmagnetics.com/> ).  Both of these companies have proved to
> be fast and reliable.
>         Satisfactory reed switches are a bit harder to find.  I have
> acquired a lot of them at hamfests - the ones that I find the most
> useful are about 1/2" long and 3/32" in diameter.  One place to find
> them on the web, or by mail, is at All Electronics
> (http://www.allelectronics.com/make-a-store/item/RSW-27/SMALL-REED-SWITC\
> H-N.O.//1.html
> <http://www.allelectronics.com/make-a-store/item/RSW-27/SMALL-REED-SWITC\
> H-N.O.//1.html> ).  Their stock varies from time to time, so I get a
> bunch of them when they are available.  Some places sell them for use in
> alarm systems, but these types tend to be pretty large.
>        There are a few things to keep in mind when working with the
> glass-encapsulated reed switches.  They are fragile, so I mount mine in
> brass tubes (5/32" diameter) for protection.  This size of tube will
> accept the switch and allow for passage of connecting wires.  The
> switches are surprisingly tolerant of soldering to the leads, as long as
> you are quick, but bending the leads (especially near to the switch
> body) is asking for trouble.
>        Some other things to be aware of.  Magnetic reed switches show
> hysteresis - that is, the point in a magnetic field where they turn on
> is different from where they turn off (they become slightly magnetized
> themselves).  This is great for use in bugs, where there is a fair
> amount of pendulum movement - the hysteresis completely eliminates the
> "scratchy dits" problem.  But in a straight key or paddle, this can pose
> a little problem.  If you have a magnet on the key lever, as you push
> the key down the switch will close at some point (which you can set to
> be the end of the stroke).  But as the key lever moves back up, the
> switch will stay closed for a small space.  This means that you might
> not be able to set the travel distance to be as small as you would want
> - especially in a paddle.
>       The switches also have "hot spots" that you can map by moving a
> small magnet around them.  The sensitivity falls off with distance
> differently depending on the hot spot chosen.  I have also found that
> the switches work predictably as long as the current switched is quite
> low (as it is with a modern keying circuit).  If you try to switch a
> higher current, the flowing current changes the characteristics of the
> switch in a rather unpredictable way.  So if you are trying to key a
> "boat anchor", a keying relay is in order.
>         Most of these properties can be turned to your advantage with
> careful design.  Best of luck with your experiments, and let us know
> what develops.
>
>        73 de Rich, WB9LPU

Messages 1516 - 1545 of 1895   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2010 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines NEW - Help