Skip to search.

Breaking News Visit Yahoo! News for the latest.

×Close this window

cw_bugs · CW BUGS

The Yahoo! Groups Product Blog

Check it out!

Group Information

  • Members: 268
  • Category: Shortwave
  • Founded: Oct 21, 2006
  • Language: English
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Message search is now enhanced, find messages faster. Take it for a spin.

Messages

Advanced
Messages Help
Messages 1486 - 1515 of 1895   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Show Message Summaries Sort by Date ^  
#1486 From: Merv Schweigert <k9fd@...>
Date: Mon Nov 15, 2010 2:56 pm
Subject: Re: Re: Suggestion
k9fd@att.net
Send Email Send Email
 
If using a vintage bug for CW work,  heres one to try,  copy the original
set up in a telegraph station,  mount a straight key of that vinatge for
your pumper,  it will have the strip contact on it already that the bug
plugs into,   then equip each bug with the cord and wedge that was
used with it originally,  just slide the bug over and plug it into the
straight keys contact.   Probably many dont know that is why the
contact strip is on the top of the straight key in the first place. 
If you were a telegrapher of CW op of that era you furnished your
own key,  and most took it home every day in a case,  when you
got to work you just plugged into the existing furnished straight
key and away you went.  
I do it for grins to preserve the nostalgia of the bugs,   bugs were
telegraph instruments mainly. 
Or for real fun hook up a telegraph sounder to the audio of your
radio and copy the CW from the sounder,  be sure and use a
tobacco can to amplify the clicks and impart the real sound of
telegraph. 
Sorry guess that shows my age to remember seeing and hearing
the real thing.  73 Merv K9FD
Sometimes things seem so obvious AFTER one thinks of it, hi hi!
 
I mount a jack on a little piece of perfboard on each key, then changing keys is as easy as plug-in.  I have thought of two easy ways for jack mounting.  One is a small piece of perfbaord with two holes the distance apart of the binding posts.  The other, that I haven't done yet, but will with my next restoration project, is one that mounts to the two screws that hold the damper, such that the jack is against the back of the base.
 
Fred
 

 

Cool beans, Fred.  I've been using a cap on each bug (and switching around since I don't have enough caps).  I'm gonna implement that one (sp?) right away.
Tnx, Milt k4oso
 
In a message dated 11/14/2010 10:04:34 AM Pacific Standard Time, just.one.hill@... writes:
P.S.  'Nother suggestion:  I plug all my bugs in to the rig through a single cable.  I have a large cap on that cable, across the bug contacts.  There is always a scratchiness with rubbing contacts, and the new solid state radios are so fast, they try to follow it.  The loading of the capacitor is all it takes to eliminate this problem.  One capacitor on the bug cable takes care of all bugs, no need to mount a cap on each bug.
 



#1487 From: Ted <tjrachwal@...>
Date: Mon Nov 15, 2010 7:22 pm
Subject: Dot extewnder
k8aqm
Send Email Send Email
 
Hello Rich (WB9LPU),
The device you saw at Fort Wayne was made and sold by "Norm's
Fabrication"(normsfab.com).  It's really sweet, I have five of them on
various bugs and they can be ordered for round stock levers or flat
stock levers.  I move my "dot extender" back on the lever and it barely
extends beyond the damper.  Norm is a neighbor of mine and designed the
"dot extender" for a group of us "bug nuts."  I'm trying to get Norm to
have these chrome plated rather than the brass they're made of.

Ted K8AQM

#1488 From: Jim Garrison <jamesgarrisonart@...>
Date: Mon Nov 15, 2010 10:03 pm
Subject: Re: Suggestion
jamesgarriso...
Send Email Send Email
 
Hello Milt:  What value capacitor do you use across the bug contacts?  Just curious...thanks es73,
Jim
K5M



From: "k4oso@..." <k4oso@...>
To: cw_bugs@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sun, November 14, 2010 5:52:34 PM
Subject: Re: [cw_bugs] Suggestion

 

Cool beans, Fred.  I've been using a cap on each bug (and switching around since I don't have enough caps).  I'm gonna implement that one (sp?) right away.
Tnx, Milt k4oso
 
In a message dated 11/14/2010 10:04:34 AM Pacific Standard Time, just.one.hill@... writes:
P.S.  'Nother suggestion:  I plug all my bugs in to the rig through a single cable.  I have a large cap on that cable, across the bug contacts.  There is always a scratchiness with rubbing contacts, and the new solid state radios are so fast, they try to follow it.  The loading of the capacitor is all it takes to eliminate this problem.  One capacitor on the bug cable takes care of all bugs, no need to mount a cap on each bug.
 



#1489 From: k4oso@...
Date: Mon Nov 15, 2010 5:32 pm
Subject: Re: Suggestion
k4oso
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi Jim,
I use a 104M, which is .001 microfarad cap.
73, Milt
 
In a message dated 11/15/2010 2:03:05 PM Pacific Standard Time, jamesgarrisonart@... writes:
Hello Milt:  What value capacitor do you use across the bug contacts?  Just curious...thanks es73,
Jim
K5M
 

#1490 From: "Fred Maas" <just.one.hill@...>
Date: Mon Nov 15, 2010 10:47 pm
Subject: Re: Suggestion
just.one.hill@...
Send Email Send Email
 
I use a .1 to get enough capcity to take some doing to discharge between stratches.
 
Fred
 
 

Hi Jim,
I use a 104M, which is .001 microfarad cap.
73, Milt
 
In a message dated 11/15/2010 2:03:05 PM Pacific Standard Time, jamesgarrisonart@... writes:
Hello Milt:  What value capacitor do you use across the bug contacts?  Just curious...thanks es73,
Jim
K5M
 


#1491 From: w9ya <w9ya@...>
Date: Mon Nov 15, 2010 11:03 pm
Subject: Re: Suggestion
w9ya
Send Email Send Email
 
Um...no;

102 would be a .001

104 **is** a .1

- Bob
w9ya

On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 3:32 PM, <k4oso@...> wrote:


Hi Jim,
I use a 104M, which is .001 microfarad cap.
73, Milt
 
In a message dated 11/15/2010 2:03:05 PM Pacific Standard Time, jamesgarrisonart@... writes:
Hello Milt:  What value capacitor do you use across the bug contacts?  Just curious...thanks es73,
Jim
K5M
 




#1492 From: Jim Garrison <jamesgarrisonart@...>
Date: Mon Nov 15, 2010 11:20 pm
Subject: Re: Suggestion
jamesgarriso...
Send Email Send Email
 
Thanks to all.

Jim
K5MSY
http://www.youtube.com/user/k5msy


From: w9ya <w9ya@...>
To: cw_bugs@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Mon, November 15, 2010 6:03:31 PM
Subject: Re: [cw_bugs] Suggestion

 

Um...no;


102 would be a .001

104 **is** a .1

- Bob
w9ya

On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 3:32 PM, <k4oso@...> wrote:


Hi Jim,
I use a 104M, which is .001 microfarad cap.
73, Milt
 
In a message dated 11/15/2010 2:03:05 PM Pacific Standard Time, jamesgarrisonart@... writes:
Hello Milt:  What value capacitor do you use across the bug contacts?  Just curious...thanks es73,
Jim
K5M
 





#1493 From: k4oso@...
Date: Mon Nov 15, 2010 6:28 pm
Subject: Re: Suggestion
k4oso
Send Email Send Email
 
Bob,
I'm no authority, but I thought the following to be the case:
104M is .001 microfarad +- 20%
103M is .01 microfarad +- 20%
102M is .1 microfarad +- 20%

73, Milt k4oso

 

In a message dated 11/15/2010 3:03:34 PM Pacific Standard Time, w9ya@... writes:

Um...no;


102 would be a .001

104 **is** a .1

- Bob
w9ya
 

#1494 From: Mike Markowski <mike.ab3ap@...>
Date: Tue Nov 16, 2010 12:05 am
Subject: Re: Suggestion
mike_markowski
Send Email Send Email
 
Small value capacitors are labeled in pF (x10^-12 F), and the power of
ten is indicated by the third digit.  So the common 104, for example, is
read as two digit value and a power of ten exponent.  E.g.,

104 = 10 x 10^4 pF
     = 100000 x 10^-12 F
     = 10^-7 F
     = 10^-1 x 10^-6 F
     = 0.1 uF

Tolerance and other info is indicated by additional letters.

Happy capping!  :-)   73,
Mike ab3ap

On 11/15/10 18:28, k4oso@... wrote:
>
>
> Bob,
> I'm no authority, but I thought the following to be the case:
> 104M is .001 microfarad +- 20%
> 103M is .01 microfarad +- 20%
> 102M is .1 microfarad +- 20%
>
> 73, Milt k4oso
>
>
>
> In a message dated 11/15/2010 3:03:34 PM Pacific Standard Time,
> w9ya@... writes:
>
>     Um...no;
>
>
>     102 would be a .001
>
>     104 **is** a .1
>
>     - Bob
>     w9ya
>
>
>
>
>

#1495 From: w9ya <w9ya@...>
Date: Tue Nov 16, 2010 12:08 am
Subject: Re: Suggestion
w9ya
Send Email Send Email
 
Um...yes !

MUCH better...

- Bob
w9ya

On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 5:05 PM, Mike Markowski <mike.ab3ap@...> wrote:
Small value capacitors are labeled in pF (x10^-12 F), and the power of
ten is indicated by the third digit.  So the common 104, for example, is
read as two digit value and a power of ten exponent.  E.g.,

104 = 10 x 10^4 pF
   = 100000 x 10^-12 F
   = 10^-7 F
   = 10^-1 x 10^-6 F
   = 0.1 uF

Tolerance and other info is indicated by additional letters.

Happy capping!  :-)   73,
Mike ab3ap

On 11/15/10 18:28, k4oso@... wrote:
>
>
> Bob,
> I'm no authority, but I thought the following to be the case:
> 104M is .001 microfarad +- 20%
> 103M is .01 microfarad +- 20%
> 102M is .1 microfarad +- 20%
>
> 73, Milt k4oso
>
>
>
> In a message dated 11/15/2010 3:03:34 PM Pacific Standard Time,
> w9ya@... writes:
>
>     Um...no;
>
>
>     102 would be a .001
>
>     104 **is** a .1
>
>     - Bob
>     w9ya
>
>
>
>
>



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
   http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cw_bugs/

<*> Your email settings:
   Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
   http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cw_bugs/join
   (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
   cw_bugs-digest@yahoogroups.com
   cw_bugs-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
   cw_bugs-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
   http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



#1496 From: "ve3akv" <ve3akv@...>
Date: Tue Nov 16, 2010 12:48 am
Subject: Re: Suggestion
ve3akv
Send Email Send Email
 
Hello to all...

Respectfully...

Frank, W7IS does in fact sell the extendadot system and has been for several
years.

I have been using his system on several of my faster bugs for some time now and
I'm very satisfied with the materials, design and performance of his product.

As I understand it, no one specifically asked him to build a device for the
masses but he took it upon himself to do just that. The extendadot is a
refreshingly simple yet well thought out design.

I for one, have no issue re-adjusting a bug and can accomplish this feat in
under a minute. Adding the extendadot arm and subsequent adjustments, was/were
no problem for me.

I also believe removing one side of the tube not only ruined the original design
but likely created a "hack" look that I would certainly never display to anyone.
I think I would be embarrased to show something like that publicly. If one had
run it through a C&C machine and could produce your enhanced design over an over
again, then maybe one might would consider it not a "hack".

Mr. Mass, I would like to think that Frank will respect your opinion as to his
designs but, don't be surprised if he doesn't send you another example to
critique. Then again, with Frank, maybe he'd send you another because that's the
type of gentleman he is.

Well... that should get the "group" going again I'd say!

Again, respectfully...

Bob
VE3AKV





--- In cw_bugs@yahoogroups.com, "Fred Maas" <just.one.hill@...> wrote:
>
> Let's make some CHATTER here...  ;-)
>
>
> Fellow bug aficionados (who likely spell better than I do) ... I expect many
of you are familiar with both Frank, W7IS, and his Extenda-Dot.   I don't know
if he is selling these are not, but may.  Anyway, he kindly sent me one for my
opinion.
>
> Well, frankly, (sorry), Frankly, I wasn't satisfied with it.  (Not that it
isn't a great idea that works, but I am rarely satisfied with anything as it
arrives ;-)   The bug had to be completely readjusted to put it on or off.  When
in use, the whole lever was canted to the side because of the thickness of the
barrel of the extenda-dot between the lever and the damper.
>
> But Frank was adamant that this thing much improved the quality of the dits
made by spreading the weight out across the length of the vibrating lever.  I
decided to modify the device.  I put it lengthwise into a vise (maybe it's a
vice, but I digress), and filed away one side of the tube, such that when
installed, the damper wheel can rest against the lever itself, not the tube.
>
> Results:
>
> * it goes on and off a bug without a need to readjust the bug.
>
> * The trombone effect can extend the lever a lot thus slowing the bug as much
as one could ever want.  In fact, with one small weight up near the vibrator,
and one small (aluminum) weight at the far end, most of my bugs will slow to 15
wpm or speed to 40 wpm, varies by bug, but typical.  I can hardly expect that
isn't a good range for almost anyone.
>
> * the quality of dits made by this arrangement is an improvement for any bug I
have tried.
>
> I am attaching photos of the arrangement which shows the extenda-dot in case
you aren't familiar, my filing modification, and how it looks on a lever.  The
bug shown, not much is visible in the close-up, is a 1910 Double-Lever.  But the
bugs I LOVE it on are the Racers and the Juniors which have shorter levers on
which to locate weights, and are thus typically, a bit fast.
>
> 73,  Fred KT5X
>
> WWW.KT5X.COM
>
> P.S.  'Nother suggestion:  I plug all my bugs in to the rig through a single
cable.  I have a large cap on that cable, across the bug contacts.  There is
always a scratchiness with rubbing contacts, and the new solid state radios are
so fast, they try to follow it.  The loading of the capacitor is all it takes to
eliminate this problem.  One capacitor on the bug cable takes care of all bugs,
no need to mount a cap on each bug.
>

#1497 From: Michael MacLeod <mm1ewa@...>
Date: Tue Nov 16, 2010 1:40 am
Subject: Re: Re: Suggestion
mm1ewa
Send Email Send Email
 

I've yet to see any of Freds craftsmanship that looks remotely hacked.

I share Freds annoyance with the amount of adjustment to the key that putting on/taking off an extendadot or similar devices that move the pendulum towards the dot contact.


His modification appears to be very worthwhile.


Regards


Michael - MM1EWA/KD0LEJ 


--- On Tue, 16/11/10, ve3akv <ve3akv@...> wrote:

From: ve3akv <ve3akv@...>
Subject: [cw_bugs] Re: Suggestion
To: cw_bugs@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, 16 November, 2010, 0:48

 

Hello to all...

Respectfully...

Frank, W7IS does in fact sell the extendadot system and has been for several years.

I have been using his system on several of my faster bugs for some time now and I'm very satisfied with the materials, design and performance of his product.

As I understand it, no one specifically asked him to build a device for the masses but he took it upon himself to do just that. The extendadot is a refreshingly simple yet well thought out design.

I for one, have no issue re-adjusting a bug and can accomplish this feat in under a minute. Adding the extendadot arm and subsequent adjustments, was/were no problem for me.

I also believe removing one side of the tube not only ruined the original design but likely created a "hack" look that I would certainly never display to anyone. I think I would be embarrased to show something like that publicly. If one had run it through a C&C machine and could produce your enhanced design over an over again, then maybe one might would consider it not a "hack".

Mr. Mass, I would like to think that Frank will respect your opinion as to his designs but, don't be surprised if he doesn't send you another example to critique. Then again, with Frank, maybe he'd send you another because that's the type of gentleman he is.

Well... that should get the "group" going again I'd say!

Again, respectfully...

Bob
VE3AKV

--- In cw_bugs@yahoogroups.com, "Fred Maas" <just.one.hill@...> wrote:
>
> Let's make some CHATTER here... ;-)
>
>
> Fellow bug aficionados (who likely spell better than I do) ... I expect many of you are familiar with both Frank, W7IS, and his Extenda-Dot. I don't know if he is selling these are not, but may. Anyway, he kindly sent me one for my opinion.
>
> Well, frankly, (sorry), Frankly, I wasn't satisfied with it. (Not that it isn't a great idea that works, but I am rarely satisfied with anything as it arrives ;-) The bug had to be completely readjusted to put it on or off. When in use, the whole lever was canted to the side because of the thickness of the barrel of the extenda-dot between the lever and the damper.
>
> But Frank was adamant that this thing much improved the quality of the dits made by spreading the weight out across the length of the vibrating lever. I decided to modify the device. I put it lengthwise into a vise (maybe it's a vice, but I digress), and filed away one side of the tube, such that when installed, the damper wheel can rest against the lever itself, not the tube.
>
> Results:
>
> * it goes on and off a bug without a need to readjust the bug.
>
> * The trombone effect can extend the lever a lot thus slowing the bug as much as one could ever want. In fact, with one small weight up near the vibrator, and one small (aluminum) weight at the far end, most of my bugs will slow to 15 wpm or speed to 40 wpm, varies by bug, but typical. I can hardly expect that isn't a good range for almost anyone.
>
> * the quality of dits made by this arrangement is an improvement for any bug I have tried.
>
> I am attaching photos of the arrangement which shows the extenda-dot in case you aren't familiar, my filing modification, and how it looks on a lever. The bug shown, not much is visible in the close-up, is a 1910 Double-Lever. But the bugs I LOVE it on are the Racers and the Juniors which have shorter levers on which to locate weights, and are thus typically, a bit fast.
>
> 73, Fred KT5X
>
> WWW.KT5X.COM
>
> P.S. 'Nother suggestion: I plug all my bugs in to the rig through a single cable. I have a large cap on that cable, across the bug contacts. There is always a scratchiness with rubbing contacts, and the new solid state radios are so fast, they try to follow it. The loading of the capacitor is all it takes to eliminate this problem. One capacitor on the bug cable takes care of all bugs, no need to mount a cap on each bug.
>



#1498 From: k4oso@...
Date: Mon Nov 15, 2010 9:06 pm
Subject: Re: Re: Suggestion
k4oso
Send Email Send Email
 
Respectfully,
It seems to me Fred has found a way to make a good thing even better, and much easier to use and remove without extra adjustments.  Many times, the first prototype of a maching/tool has somewhat of a "hack" look, to be refined in the finished product.  That is not a negative thing.  If the product works better, I think its a cause for celebration. 
Congratulations to Frank for his super idea, and to Fred for a refinement that makes that idea even better.  Now, on to the polishers and finishers for that "showroom" look.
 
73, Milt k4oso
 
In a message dated 11/15/2010 4:48:39 PM Pacific Standard Time, ve3akv@... writes:
Hello to all...

Respectfully...

Frank, W7IS does in fact sell the extendadot system and has been for several years.

I have been using his system on several of my faster bugs for some time now and I'm very satisfied with the materials, design and performance of his product.

As I understand it, no one specifically asked him to build a device for the masses but he took it upon himself to do just that. The extendadot is a refreshingly simple yet well thought out design.

I for one, have no issue re-adjusting a bug and can accomplish this feat in under a minute. Adding the extendadot arm and subsequent adjustments, was/were no problem for me.

I also believe removing one side of the tube not only ruined the original design but likely created a "hack" look that I would certainly never display to anyone. I think I would be embarrased to show something like that publicly. If one had run it through a C&C machine and could produce your enhanced design over an over again, then maybe one might would consider it not a "hack".

Mr. Mass, I would like to think that Frank will respect your opinion as to his designs but, don't be surprised if he doesn't send you another example to critique. Then again, with Frank, maybe he'd send you another because that's the type of gentleman he is.

Well... that should get the "group" going again I'd say!

Again, respectfully...

Bob
VE3AKV
 

#1499 From: k4oso@...
Date: Mon Nov 15, 2010 9:10 pm
Subject: Re: Suggestion
k4oso
Send Email Send Email
 
Thanks, Mike for the great explanation of how the labelling works. 
73, Milt k4oso
 
In a message dated 11/15/2010 4:05:29 PM Pacific Standard Time, mike.ab3ap@... writes:
Small value capacitors are labeled in pF (x10^-12 F), and the power of
ten is indicated by the third digit. So the common 104, for example, is
read as two digit value and a power of ten exponent. E.g.,

104 = 10 x 10^4 pF
= 100000 x 10^-12 F
= 10^-7 F
= 10^-1 x 10^-6 F
= 0.1 uF

Tolerance and other info is indicated by additional letters.

Happy capping! :-) 73,
Mike ab3ap
 

#1500 From: "Fred Maas" <just.one.hill@...>
Date: Tue Nov 16, 2010 2:19 am
Subject: Re: Re: Suggestion
just.one.hill@...
Send Email Send Email
 
Actually, Frank said he did the same thing, but preferred the simpler way.  It doesn't look like anything, as you can't see it unless looking for it with a magnifying glass ha-hah!
 
Good luck, Pal,
 
73  Fred
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: ve3akv
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2010 5:48 PM
Subject: [cw_bugs] Re: Suggestion

 

Hello to all...

Respectfully...

Frank, W7IS does in fact sell the extendadot system and has been for several years.

I have been using his system on several of my faster bugs for some time now and I'm very satisfied with the materials, design and performance of his product.

As I understand it, no one specifically asked him to build a device for the masses but he took it upon himself to do just that. The extendadot is a refreshingly simple yet well thought out design.

I for one, have no issue re-adjusting a bug and can accomplish this feat in under a minute. Adding the extendadot arm and subsequent adjustments, was/were no problem for me.

I also believe removing one side of the tube not only ruined the original design but likely created a "hack" look that I would certainly never display to anyone. I think I would be embarrased to show something like that publicly. If one had run it through a C&C machine and could produce your enhanced design over an over again, then maybe one might would consider it not a "hack".

Mr. Mass, I would like to think that Frank will respect your opinion as to his designs but, don't be surprised if he doesn't send you another example to critique. Then again, with Frank, maybe he'd send you another because that's the type of gentleman he is.

Well... that should get the "group" going again I'd say!

Again, respectfully...

Bob
VE3AKV

--- In cw_bugs@yahoogroups.com, "Fred Maas" <just.one.hill@...> wrote:
>
> Let's make some CHATTER here... ;-)
>
>
> Fellow bug aficionados (who likely spell better than I do) ... I expect many of you are familiar with both Frank, W7IS, and his Extenda-Dot. I don't know if he is selling these are not, but may. Anyway, he kindly sent me one for my opinion.
>
> Well, frankly, (sorry), Frankly, I wasn't satisfied with it. (Not that it isn't a great idea that works, but I am rarely satisfied with anything as it arrives ;-) The bug had to be completely readjusted to put it on or off. When in use, the whole lever was canted to the side because of the thickness of the barrel of the extenda-dot between the lever and the damper.
>
> But Frank was adamant that this thing much improved the quality of the dits made by spreading the weight out across the length of the vibrating lever. I decided to modify the device. I put it lengthwise into a vise (maybe it's a vice, but I digress), and filed away one side of the tube, such that when installed, the damper wheel can rest against the lever itself, not the tube.
>
> Results:
>
> * it goes on and off a bug without a need to readjust the bug.
>
> * The trombone effect can extend the lever a lot thus slowing the bug as much as one could ever want. In fact, with one small weight up near the vibrator, and one small (aluminum) weight at the far end, most of my bugs will slow to 15 wpm or speed to 40 wpm, varies by bug, but typical. I can hardly expect that isn't a good range for almost anyone.
>
> * the quality of dits made by this arrangement is an improvement for any bug I have tried.
>
> I am attaching photos of the arrangement which shows the extenda-dot in case you aren't familiar, my filing modification, and how it looks on a lever. The bug shown, not much is visible in the close-up, is a 1910 Double-Lever. But the bugs I LOVE it on are the Racers and the Juniors which have shorter levers on which to locate weights, and are thus typically, a bit fast.
>
> 73, Fred KT5X
>
> WWW.KT5X.COM
>
> P.S. 'Nother suggestion: I plug all my bugs in to the rig through a single cable. I have a large cap on that cable, across the bug contacts. There is always a scratchiness with rubbing contacts, and the new solid state radios are so fast, they try to follow it. The loading of the capacitor is all it takes to eliminate this problem. One capacitor on the bug cable takes care of all bugs, no need to mount a cap on each bug.
>


#1501 From: "ve3akv" <ve3akv@...>
Date: Tue Nov 16, 2010 3:44 am
Subject: Re: Suggestion
ve3akv
Send Email Send Email
 
Fred...

Ok...I know when to cut some slack.

Regards,

73 - Bob

--- In cw_bugs@yahoogroups.com, "Fred Maas" <just.one.hill@...> wrote:
>
> Actually, Frank said he did the same thing, but preferred the simpler way.  It
doesn't look like anything, as you can't see it unless looking for it with a
magnifying glass ha-hah!
>
> Good luck, Pal,
>
> 73  Fred
>
>
>
>   ----- Original Message -----
>   From: ve3akv
>   To: cw_bugs@yahoogroups.com
>   Sent: Monday, November 15, 2010 5:48 PM
>   Subject: [cw_bugs] Re: Suggestion
>
>
>
>   Hello to all...
>
>   Respectfully...
>
>   Frank, W7IS does in fact sell the extendadot system and has been for several
years.
>
>   I have been using his system on several of my faster bugs for some time now
and I'm very satisfied with the materials, design and performance of his
product.
>
>   As I understand it, no one specifically asked him to build a device for the
masses but he took it upon himself to do just that. The extendadot is a
refreshingly simple yet well thought out design.
>
>   I for one, have no issue re-adjusting a bug and can accomplish this feat in
under a minute. Adding the extendadot arm and subsequent adjustments, was/were
no problem for me.
>
>   I also believe removing one side of the tube not only ruined the original
design but likely created a "hack" look that I would certainly never display to
anyone. I think I would be embarrased to show something like that publicly. If
one had run it through a C&C machine and could produce your enhanced design over
an over again, then maybe one might would consider it not a "hack".
>
>   Mr. Mass, I would like to think that Frank will respect your opinion as to
his designs but, don't be surprised if he doesn't send you another example to
critique. Then again, with Frank, maybe he'd send you another because that's the
type of gentleman he is.
>
>   Well... that should get the "group" going again I'd say!
>
>   Again, respectfully...
>
>   Bob
>   VE3AKV
>
>   --- In cw_bugs@yahoogroups.com, "Fred Maas" <just.one.hill@> wrote:
>   >
>   > Let's make some CHATTER here... ;-)
>   >
>   >
>   > Fellow bug aficionados (who likely spell better than I do) ... I expect
many of you are familiar with both Frank, W7IS, and his Extenda-Dot. I don't
know if he is selling these are not, but may. Anyway, he kindly sent me one for
my opinion.
>   >
>   > Well, frankly, (sorry), Frankly, I wasn't satisfied with it. (Not that it
isn't a great idea that works, but I am rarely satisfied with anything as it
arrives ;-) The bug had to be completely readjusted to put it on or off. When in
use, the whole lever was canted to the side because of the thickness of the
barrel of the extenda-dot between the lever and the damper.
>   >
>   > But Frank was adamant that this thing much improved the quality of the
dits made by spreading the weight out across the length of the vibrating lever.
I decided to modify the device. I put it lengthwise into a vise (maybe it's a
vice, but I digress), and filed away one side of the tube, such that when
installed, the damper wheel can rest against the lever itself, not the tube.
>   >
>   > Results:
>   >
>   > * it goes on and off a bug without a need to readjust the bug.
>   >
>   > * The trombone effect can extend the lever a lot thus slowing the bug as
much as one could ever want. In fact, with one small weight up near the
vibrator, and one small (aluminum) weight at the far end, most of my bugs will
slow to 15 wpm or speed to 40 wpm, varies by bug, but typical. I can hardly
expect that isn't a good range for almost anyone.
>   >
>   > * the quality of dits made by this arrangement is an improvement for any
bug I have tried.
>   >
>   > I am attaching photos of the arrangement which shows the extenda-dot in
case you aren't familiar, my filing modification, and how it looks on a lever.
The bug shown, not much is visible in the close-up, is a 1910 Double-Lever. But
the bugs I LOVE it on are the Racers and the Juniors which have shorter levers
on which to locate weights, and are thus typically, a bit fast.
>   >
>   > 73, Fred KT5X
>   >
>   > WWW.KT5X.COM
>   >
>   > P.S. 'Nother suggestion: I plug all my bugs in to the rig through a single
cable. I have a large cap on that cable, across the bug contacts. There is
always a scratchiness with rubbing contacts, and the new solid state radios are
so fast, they try to follow it. The loading of the capacitor is all it takes to
eliminate this problem. One capacitor on the bug cable takes care of all bugs,
no need to mount a cap on each bug.
>   >
>

#1502 From: Tony Morgan <1desertdweller@...>
Date: Wed Nov 17, 2010 1:07 am
Subject: Re: Test - Some activity
w7go
Send Email Send Email
 
I guess everyone knows Vibroplex has the bug tamer available in both round and flat.

73,

Tony W7GO

On 11/14/2010 10:05 PM, Pete Ferrand wrote:
 

In case anyone wants to track down the maker of the bug slower-downer (he didn't have a name for it) it's:

http://www.normsfab.com/

Norm's Fabrication in Adrian MI. The device is not on the web page. Price at the show was $25 with versions for both round and flat shafted Vibroplex bugs.

I also thought they worked OK and were of a simple functional design that should be reliable.

-Pete
WB2QLL
Somers, WI





-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Meiss
Sent: Nov 14, 2010 9:37 PM
To: cw_bugs@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [cw_bugs] Test - Some activity



Hi, All -

     Have been silent, but lurking, as I work on a new family of bugs that I call  "balanced bug."  I have made videos of two of them (so far), for which the URL's are listed below -

The first is a bug designed for use in the shack -

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2eggX60OEPk&feature=mfu_in_order&list=UL

The second is for use either in the shack or in the field -

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-TG_J57LOWE&feature=mfu_in_order&list=UL

   The design (six versions so far) used the ball-pivot mechanism that I have used in other instruments, and are built around a statically-balanced pendulum that is not sensitive to the effects of gravity.  Speed can be varied from 5 to 30+ wpm with a single adjustment that has no effect on the dot-weight.  I will be writing up the project sometime soon, and there are more videos to come.  I apologize for the length of the two videos - I get long-winded.  Since the narration is in CW by the bugs themselves, it does take some time.

   At the Ft. Wayne (IN) hamfest today, I saw yet another design for a slower-downer for conventional bugs.  Its design avoids conflicts with the damper mechanism, but there is quite a bit of overhang at the front of the bug.  While not quite as easily adjustable as the "Bug Tamer", it works well and its maker (his name escapes me) is working on a few more refinements.

   73 de Rich, WB9LPU







#1503 From: "Earl Needham" <earl.kd5xb@...>
Date: Wed Nov 17, 2010 2:12 pm
Subject: Re: Test - Some activity
earl_needham
Send Email Send Email
 
Vari-Speed?

Earl

KD5XB -- Earl Needham http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cw_bugs Quoting from the Coast Guard: ZUT Posted via Blackberry


From: Tony Morgan <1desertdweller@...>
Sender: cw_bugs@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 17:07:19 -0800
To: <cw_bugs@yahoogroups.com>
ReplyTo: cw_bugs@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [cw_bugs] Test - Some activity

 

I guess everyone knows Vibroplex has the bug tamer available in both round and flat.

73,

Tony W7GO

On 11/14/2010 10:05 PM, Pete Ferrand wrote:

 

In case anyone wants to track down the maker of the bug slower-downer (he didn't have a name for it) it's:

http://www.normsfab.com/

Norm's Fabrication in Adrian MI. The device is not on the web page. Price at the show was $25 with versions for both round and flat shafted Vibroplex bugs.

I also thought they worked OK and were of a simple functional design that should be reliable.

-Pete
WB2QLL
Somers, WI





-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Meiss
Sent: Nov 14, 2010 9:37 PM
To: cw_bugs@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [cw_bugs] Test - Some activity



Hi, All -

     Have been silent, but lurking, as I work on a new family of bugs that I call  "balanced bug."  I have made videos of two of them (so far), for which the URL's are listed below -

The first is a bug designed for use in the shack -

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2eggX60OEPk&feature=mfu_in_order&list=UL

The second is for use either in the shack or in the field -

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-TG_J57LOWE&feature=mfu_in_order&list=UL

   The design (six versions so far) used the ball-pivot mechanism that I have used in other instruments, and are built around a statically-balanced pendulum that is not sensitive to the effects of gravity.  Speed can be varied from 5 to 30+ wpm with a single adjustment that has no effect on the dot-weight.  I will be writing up the project sometime soon, and there are more videos to come.  I apologize for the length of the two videos - I get long-winded.  Since the narration is in CW by the bugs themselves, it does take some time.

   At the Ft. Wayne (IN) hamfest today, I saw yet another design for a slower-downer for conventional bugs.  Its design avoids conflicts with the damper mechanism, but there is quite a bit of overhang at the front of the bug.  While not quite as easily adjustable as the "Bug Tamer", it works well and its maker (his name escapes me) is working on a few more refinements.

   73 de Rich, WB9LPU







#1504 From: Tony Morgan <1desertdweller@...>
Date: Wed Nov 17, 2010 3:13 pm
Subject: Re: Test - Some activity
w7go
Send Email Send Email
 
You are right Earl.
Thanks for the correction.

73,

Tony W7GO

On 11/17/2010 6:12 AM, Earl Needham wrote:
 

Vari-Speed?

Earl

KD5XB -- Earl Needham http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cw_bugs Quoting from the Coast Guard: ZUT Posted via Blackberry


From: Tony Morgan <1desertdweller@...>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 17:07:19 -0800
Subject: Re: [cw_bugs] Test - Some activity

 

I guess everyone knows Vibroplex has the bug tamer available in both round and flat.

73,

Tony W7GO

On 11/14/2010 10:05 PM, Pete Ferrand wrote:

 

In case anyone wants to track down the maker of the bug slower-downer (he didn't have a name for it) it's:

http://www.normsfab.com/

Norm's Fabrication in Adrian MI. The device is not on the web page. Price at the show was $25 with versions for both round and flat shafted Vibroplex bugs.

I also thought they worked OK and were of a simple functional design that should be reliable.

-Pete
WB2QLL
Somers, WI





-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Meiss
Sent: Nov 14, 2010 9:37 PM
To: cw_bugs@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [cw_bugs] Test - Some activity



Hi, All -

     Have been silent, but lurking, as I work on a new family of bugs that I call  "balanced bug."  I have made videos of two of them (so far), for which the URL's are listed below -

The first is a bug designed for use in the shack -

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2eggX60OEPk&feature=mfu_in_order&list=UL

The second is for use either in the shack or in the field -

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-TG_J57LOWE&feature=mfu_in_order&list=UL

   The design (six versions so far) used the ball-pivot mechanism that I have used in other instruments, and are built around a statically-balanced pendulum that is not sensitive to the effects of gravity.  Speed can be varied from 5 to 30+ wpm with a single adjustment that has no effect on the dot-weight.  I will be writing up the project sometime soon, and there are more videos to come.  I apologize for the length of the two videos - I get long-winded.  Since the narration is in CW by the bugs themselves, it does take some time.

   At the Ft. Wayne (IN) hamfest today, I saw yet another design for a slower-downer for conventional bugs.  Its design avoids conflicts with the damper mechanism, but there is quite a bit of overhang at the front of the bug.  While not quite as easily adjustable as the "Bug Tamer", it works well and its maker (his name escapes me) is working on a few more refinements.

   73 de Rich, WB9LPU







#1505 From: "earl_needham" <earl.kd5xb@...>
Date: Wed Nov 17, 2010 5:40 pm
Subject: Re: Test - Some activity
earl_needham
Send Email Send Email
 
Didn't really meanit as a correction, more as a clarification, since I was
confused and thought maybe the "new guy" had changed his product lines!  <G>

Vy 7 3
Earl

--- In cw_bugs@yahoogroups.com, Tony Morgan <1desertdweller@...> wrote:
>
> You are right Earl.
> Thanks for the correction.
>
> 73,
>
> Tony W7GO
>
> On 11/17/2010 6:12 AM, Earl Needham wrote:
> >
> > Vari-Speed?
> >
> >
> > I guess everyone knows Vibroplex has the bug tamer available in both
> > round and flat.
> >
> > 73,
> >
> > Tony W7GO

#1506 From: Tony Morgan <1desertdweller@...>
Date: Thu Nov 18, 2010 2:09 am
Subject: Re: Re: Test - Some activity
w7go
Send Email Send Email
 
FB Earl,
Somewhere in the back of my old mind I had remembered a "bug tamer".
For some reason I plugged that in, do you remember it?
Anyway I have both the flat & round Vari-Speed ant am very happy with them.

73,

Tony W7GO

On 11/17/2010 9:40 AM, earl_needham wrote:
 

Didn't really meanit as a correction, more as a clarification, since I was confused and thought maybe the "new guy" had changed his product lines! <G>

Vy 7 3
Earl

--- In cw_bugs@yahoogroups.com, Tony Morgan <1desertdweller@...> wrote:
>
> You are right Earl.
> Thanks for the correction.
>
> 73,
>
> Tony W7GO
>
> On 11/17/2010 6:12 AM, Earl Needham wrote:
> >
> > Vari-Speed?
> >
> >
> > I guess everyone knows Vibroplex has the bug tamer available in both
> > round and flat.
> >
> > 73,
> >
> > Tony W7GO


#1507 From: "Earl Needham" <earl.kd5xb@...>
Date: Thu Nov 18, 2010 6:26 am
Subject: Re: Re: Test - Some activity
earl_needham
Send Email Send Email
 
I remember the term, too, but I'm no longer sure what one is. Pix at http://kd8jhj.blogspot.com/2010/04/kd8jhj-bug-tamer.html show something like the Extend-a-Dot, but other pages show the Vari-Speed while calling it the Bug Tamer. Maybe it has become a word like "Kleenex" -- people use the brand name for ALL tissues.

Vy 7 3
Earl

KD5XB -- Earl Needham http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cw_bugs Quoting from the Coast Guard: ZUT Posted via Blackberry


From: Tony Morgan <1desertdweller@...>
Sender: cw_bugs@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 18:09:00 -0800
To: <cw_bugs@yahoogroups.com>
ReplyTo: cw_bugs@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [cw_bugs] Re: Test - Some activity

 

FB Earl,
Somewhere in the back of my old mind I had remembered a "bug tamer".
For some reason I plugged that in, do you remember it?
Anyway I have both the flat & round Vari-Speed ant am very happy with them.

73,

Tony W7GO

On 11/17/2010 9:40 AM, earl_needham wrote:

 

Didn't really meanit as a correction, more as a clarification, since I was confused and thought maybe the "new guy" had changed his product lines! <G>

Vy 7 3
Earl

--- In cw_bugs@yahoogroups.com, Tony Morgan <1desertdweller@...> wrote:
>
> You are right Earl.
> Thanks for the correction.
>
> 73,
>
> Tony W7GO
>
> On 11/17/2010 6:12 AM, Earl Needham wrote:
> >
> > Vari-Speed?
> >
> >
> > I guess everyone knows Vibroplex has the bug tamer available in both
> > round and flat.
> >
> > 73,
> >
> > Tony W7GO


#1508 From: Tony Morgan <1desertdweller@...>
Date: Thu Nov 18, 2010 4:04 pm
Subject: Re: Re: Test - Some activity
w7go
Send Email Send Email
 
Found out that Vibroplex sold the "bug-tamer" before the "Vari-Speed.
It was dis-continued.

73,

Tony W7GO

On 11/17/2010 10:26 PM, Earl Needham wrote:
 

I remember the term, too, but I'm no longer sure what one is. Pix at http://kd8jhj.blogspot.com/2010/04/kd8jhj-bug-tamer.html show something like the Extend-a-Dot, but other pages show the Vari-Speed while calling it the Bug Tamer. Maybe it has become a word like "Kleenex" -- people use the brand name for ALL tissues.

Vy 7 3
Earl

KD5XB -- Earl Needham http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cw_bugs Quoting from the Coast Guard: ZUT Posted via Blackberry


From: Tony Morgan <1desertdweller@...>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 18:09:00 -0800
Subject: Re: [cw_bugs] Re: Test - Some activity

 

FB Earl,
Somewhere in the back of my old mind I had remembered a "bug tamer".
For some reason I plugged that in, do you remember it?
Anyway I have both the flat & round Vari-Speed ant am very happy with them.

73,

Tony W7GO

On 11/17/2010 9:40 AM, earl_needham wrote:

 

Didn't really meanit as a correction, more as a clarification, since I was confused and thought maybe the "new guy" had changed his product lines! <G>

Vy 7 3
Earl

--- In cw_bugs@yahoogroups.com, Tony Morgan <1desertdweller@...> wrote:
>
> You are right Earl.
> Thanks for the correction.
>
> 73,
>
> Tony W7GO
>
> On 11/17/2010 6:12 AM, Earl Needham wrote:
> >
> > Vari-Speed?
> >
> >
> > I guess everyone knows Vibroplex has the bug tamer available in both
> > round and flat.
> >
> > 73,
> >
> > Tony W7GO


#1509 From: Fernando <n2fq@...>
Date: Thu Nov 18, 2010 5:37 pm
Subject: Vibroplex Bug Tamer
n2fq
Send Email Send Email
 
Hello

I have one of these and consider it as an aid to someone new to a bug.

Whereas the Vari-speed is for someone familiar with the bug

and uses it to change the speed on the fly to accommodate the speed of

the other operator.

A search on Youtube will yield some videos.

Just my opinion.

enjoy these critters.. hi.

73 N2FQ/6

#1510 From: "Troy W6HV" <w6hv@...>
Date: Thu Nov 18, 2010 5:47 pm
Subject: Re: Re: Test - Some activity
w6hv
Send Email Send Email
 
The old “bug-tamer” is simple to make from hobby shop brass tubing. I’ve made several and just added some photos to the photo section.
73,
Troy, W6HV
 
Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 8:04 AM
Subject: Re: [cw_bugs] Re: Test - Some activity
 


Found out that Vibroplex sold the "bug-tamer" before the "Vari-Speed.
It was dis-continued.

73,

Tony W7GO

On 11/17/2010 10:26 PM, Earl Needham wrote:
 

I remember the term, too, but I'm no longer sure what one is. Pix at http://kd8jhj.blogspot.com/2010/04/kd8jhj-bug-tamer.html show something like the Extend-a-Dot, but other pages show the Vari-Speed while calling it the Bug Tamer. Maybe it has become a word like "Kleenex" -- people use the brand name for ALL tissues.

Vy 7 3
Earl

KD5XB -- Earl Needham http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cw_bugs Quoting from the Coast Guard: ZUT Posted via Blackberry


From: Tony Morgan mailto:1desertdweller@...
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 18:09:00 -0800
Subject: Re: [cw_bugs] Re: Test - Some activity
 
 

FB Earl,
Somewhere in the back of my old mind I had remembered a "bug tamer".
For some reason I plugged that in, do you remember it?
Anyway I have both the flat & round Vari-Speed ant am very happy with them.

73,

Tony W7GO

On 11/17/2010 9:40 AM, earl_needham wrote:

 

Didn't really meanit as a correction, more as a clarification, since I was confused and thought maybe the "new guy" had changed his product lines! <G>

Vy 7 3
Earl

--- In mailto:cw_bugs%40yahoogroups.com, Tony Morgan mailto:1desertdweller@... wrote:
>
> You are right Earl.
> Thanks for the correction.
>
> 73,
>
> Tony W7GO
>
> On 11/17/2010 6:12 AM, Earl Needham wrote:
> >
> > Vari-Speed?
> >
> >
> > I guess everyone knows Vibroplex has the bug tamer available in both
> > round and flat.
> >
> > 73,
> >
> > Tony W7GO


#1511 From: Pete Ferrand <petef@...>
Date: Fri Nov 19, 2010 1:31 am
Subject: Ten minute bug tamer
cr88a
Send Email Send Email
 
Whilst unpacking from my trip to the Fort Wayne hamfest and a few more days
seeing the sights of northwestern Ohio, I got to thinking of the bug tamer
projects. Don't you love it when a mechanical problem can be solved in ten
minutes?

The core of this project is the use of an electrical neutral/ground bar - the
kind that goes into an electrical panel and has lots of screws in it, designed
to fasten wires. These are available in many styles from any electrical supplier
and most hardware stores.  The one I used is made by Ilsco.

I've tried to attach the pictures and put up a copy in the Photos section. An
intact bus bar is also shown. I got these free from someone giving them away at
a ham flea market years ago and knew I'd find a use for them eventually. If you
buy one you can of course buy a much shorter one. This is a perfect use for some
electrical scrap that many people have access to.

For each piece, I just cut the bar to separate two of the screws and ran the
vibrator of the bug through one wire hole and the new extension vibrator through
the other. It's copper so very easy to cut and file smooth.  I used a cutoff saw
but a hacksaw will work fine.  You could cut the bar so the two pieces are
identical and smoothly finished but this was my first shot at it.

For the extension vibrator I used a piece of 3.75mm aluminum knitting needle
from Wal-Mart. You can use a nail, chrome utensil handles, or what I usually use
to build bugs, pegboard hooks.

Now since this is so easy to make I used two pieces of the ground bar next to
each other. This adds some more weight as well. It seems as though having two of
these is more secure but using only one appears to be sufficient. If the screws
tend to work a loose a drop of Locktite Blue will keep them secure and be
removable.

I believe it works pretty much like any other bug tamer but doesn't require
machine work, finding specific tubing, or affect the alignment of the bug, and
if carefully made doesn't look like a complete kludge.

73,
-Pete
WB2QLL
Somers, WI

3 of 3 Photo(s)


#1512 From: "Fred Maas" <just.one.hill@...>
Date: Fri Nov 19, 2010 2:07 am
Subject: Re: Some activity
just.one.hill@...
Send Email Send Email
 
The Bug-Tamer as marketed by Vibroplex was a tube that fit over the lever, and put the weight at the far end, w-a-y out behind the bug.  It slowed the bug w-a-y down.
 
Vari-speed as marketed by Vibroplex, was a copy of the Hills Brothers Speed-changer of the early fifties.  It is a second lever that bolts onto the primary one, and is free to rotate in a half circle above the vibrating lever.  One or two weights can be put on it.  it works best with the old U-shaped dampers of the earlier Racers.  It will slow a bug down if aimed back, but it is primarily intended to be a convenient way to rapidly change the speed of a bug.  The man who was making the copy went SK.
 
Extendadot is made by Frank, W7IS.  It is a tube that fits over the lever, and it mounts not one, but two weights, one at either end.  Frank provides light weights so that it isn't just beginner-slow.  It is meant to improve the quality of the dots made by any bug by distributing the weight along the pendulum.  I suggested filing away one side so that the damper rests against the original pendulum and thus it can be trasnfered from key to key without causing any of the keys to be readjusted.
 
Of the three, the extenda-dot is my favorite.
 
73,  Fred - kt5x
 
 
 
 

I remember the term, too, but I'm no longer sure what one is. Pix at http://kd8jhj.blogspot.com/2010/04/kd8jhj-bug-tamer.html show something like the Extend-a-Dot, but other pages show the Vari-Speed while calling it the Bug Tamer. Maybe it has become a word like "Kleenex" -- people use the brand name for ALL tissues.

Vy 7 3
Earl

KD5XB -- Earl Needham http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cw_bugs Quoting from the Coast Guard: ZUT Posted via Blackberry


#1513 From: wz4cw@...
Date: Fri Nov 19, 2010 8:30 am
Subject: Re: Re: Some activity
ares1934
Send Email Send Email
 

Vibroplex is now selling the Vari-Speed-

Carl

73     SKCC 918     FISTS 13491

----- Original Message -----
From: "Fred Maas" <just.one.hill@...>
To: "cw bugs" <cw_bugs@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 9:07:47 PM
Subject: [cw_bugs] Re:  Some activity

 

The Bug-Tamer as marketed by Vibroplex was a tube that fit over the lever, and put the weight at the far end, w-a-y out behind the bug.  It slowed the bug w-a-y down.
 
Vari-speed as marketed by Vibroplex, was a copy of the Hills Brothers Speed-changer of the early fifties.  It is a second lever that bolts onto the primary one, and is free to rotate in a half circle above the vibrating lever.  One or two weights can be put on it.  it works best with the old U-shaped dampers of the earlier Racers.  It will slow a bug down if aimed back, but it is primarily intended to be a convenient way to rapidly change the speed of a bug.  The man who was making the copy went SK.
 
Extendadot is made by Frank, W7IS.  It is a tube that fits over the lever, and it mounts not one, but two weights, one at either end.  Frank provides light weights so that it isn't just beginner-slow.  It is meant to improve the quality of the dots made by any bug by distributing the weight along the pendulum.  I suggested filing away one side so that the damper rests against the original pendulum and thus it can be trasnfered from key to key without causing any of the keys to be readjusted.
 
Of the three, the extenda-dot is my favorite.
 
73,  Fred - kt5x
 
 
 
 

I remember the term, too, but I'm no longer sure what one is. Pix at http://kd8jhj.blogspot.com/2010/04/kd8jhj-bug-tamer.html show something like the Extend-a-Dot, but other pages show the Vari-Speed while calling it the Bug Tamer. Maybe it has become a word like "Kleenex" -- people use the brand name for ALL tissues.

Vy 7 3
Earl

KD5XB -- Earl Needham http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cw_bugs Quoting from the Coast Guard: ZUT Posted via Blackberry


#1514 From: "Larry Makoski" <w2lj@...>
Date: Sun Nov 21, 2010 6:25 pm
Subject: RFTB Tonight - In honor of K8DD
w2lj@...
Send Email Send Email
 
Tonight's RFTB is dedicated to the memory of our departed brother K8DD.

I hope that all Flying Pigs and QRPers will take this opportunity to get on the
air and warm up the aether in Hank's memory - it is fitting to be on the air
with him in mind.

The time is the same as always:

East coast - 9:00 to 11:00 PM local time
Midwest - 8:00 to 10:00 PM local time
Rockies - 7:00 to 9:00 PM local time
West coast - 6:00 to 8:00 PM local time

The rules are at:

http://www.fpqrp.com/fpqrprun.php

73 de Larry W2LJ
FP# 612
QRP ARCI# 4488

#1515 From: "NAQCC" <va3rj@...>
Date: Mon Nov 22, 2010 5:13 pm
Subject: NAQCC News Release
va3rj
Send Email Send Email
 
News Release - Please pass the word ...

NAQCC - Lifetime membership is FREE!!

Want to be part of the largest QRP CW club in the world? (4,800+ members
from 85+ countries!)

With winter coming up in the Northern Hemisphere, it's an ideal time to join
the NAQCC and participate in its many varied activities.

Perhaps you are looking for someone to "Elmer" you? Then we have just what
you need to develop and improve your CW skills, including QRS nets perfect
for the new CW op.

Or maybe you would like to volunteer your time and become an "Elmer" to help
one of those fellow hams new to Morse code.

And how about a Sprint or two thrown in for good measure?  We have them too,
for those of you who like a little friendly contesting. Our last 8 sprints
have each garnered well over 100 logs from 150+ participants, making them
among the most popular ever 2 hour sprints.

Want something that lasts a little longer than a sprint? We have challenges
that last a whole month with a different theme each month.

Into awards? Our extensive awards program has something for everyone.

Many of our sprints, challenges, awards, and other club activities involve
handsome prizes donated by our members.

Best of all, this and more can be yours at NO COST just by joining the NAQCC
(North American QRP CW Club).  Lifetime membership is FREE!!

As different as we may be, we all share one thing in common, and that is our
love for CW.

Now is the time to get involved!  Join our group that includes "Big Gun"
contesters, hard-core QRPers, experimenters, ragchewers and SWLers; young
and old alike.  We welcome all who want to help support CW and have at least
some interest in using QRP from time-to-time.

Help us on our mission to preserve and encourage CW activity on our amateur
bands. Sign up today and help keep CW alive and well.

Don't wait, do it now!

Visit http://home.windstream.net/yoel/ to sign up and receive your FREE
lifetime membership number and certificate.

On behalf of:
Tom, WY3H - NAQCC President
John, K3WWP - NAQCC Vice President
Paul, KD2MX - NAQCC Recruitment Officer
Dave, VA3RJ/VE3JDR - NAQCC Publicity Officer
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Messages 1486 - 1515 of 1895   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2010 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines NEW - Help