With apologies for cross posting: Just a reminder that out Seminar with Gerd Ludemann on his book _The Resurrection of Christ_ begins on Monday, Jan 3rd. We...
17877
Theodore Weeden
Tweeden@...
Jan 1, 2005 10:39 pm
Stephen Carlson wrote on Saturday, January 01, 2005 2:46 PM: Subject: Re: [XTalk] The Streetlight Fallacy ... [TJW} For some reason I did not receive Steve's...
17878
Theodore Weeden
Tweeden@...
Jan 1, 2005 10:47 pm
For some reason, Steve Davies' original post (see below) appeared on my computer after I just sent a post regarding it and Stephen Carlson's reply to it. That...
17879
Patrick Narkinsky
amphigory2
Jan 1, 2005 11:04 pm
... I don't think this analogy is on point. The problem is that, in the case of the drunk seeking his keys, there is no reason to think (and good reason not...
17880
C. McKinney
C_McK
Jan 1, 2005 11:04 pm
I took the following comment from Gavin McNett to be a comparison of Brown ... To which Jeffrey Gibson (no doubt reflecting the sensibilities of many of ... ...
17881
Jeffrey B. Gibson
jgibson000
Jan 1, 2005 11:12 pm
... Because Brown is making claims about the HJ and Chick is making claims about Wescott and Hort. Moreover, Brown's works is an international best seller....
17882
Patrick Narkinsky
amphigory2
Jan 1, 2005 11:18 pm
... Well, I'm just throwing this, out but I'd say the fact that Brown presents his views as being the prevailing opinion in Academic circles might have...
17883
Jim West
drjewest
Jan 1, 2005 11:23 pm
... Even worse, Brown's book, a fiction, is read by many as a factual account. I know, you know, pretty much everyone on list knows its fiction- but the...
17884
Bob Schacht
r_schacht
Jan 1, 2005 11:44 pm
... I knew someone was going to bring up this point. We can each provide our own counter-metaphor-- mine is that the drunk dropped his keys next to his parked...
17885
Jim West
drjewest
Jan 2, 2005 12:55 am
... Actually it is only on point if one assumes that folk holding to something resembling historical christianity are drunks stumbling along in the dark. Not...
17886
Patrick Narkinsky
amphigory2
Jan 2, 2005 1:21 am
... I would take a different tack: that Jesus was the "first fruits" of the general resurrection and that, by raising him from the dead, God has promised to do...
17887
Bob Schacht
r_schacht
Jan 2, 2005 3:20 am
... Thanks for taking the time, and Happy New Year! ... Well, it gets us off-topic a little here, but to call oneself a Christian implies priorities, and to...
17888
Tony Buglass
tonybuglass
Jan 2, 2005 9:56 am
... Actually it is only on point if one assumes that folk holding to something resembling historical christianity are drunks stumbling along in the dark. Not...
17889
Loren Rosson
rossoiii
Jan 2, 2005 10:55 am
[Bob] ... I'm afraid you'd have to ask a Christian like Dale. :) ... I'm actually choosing the word very carefully, and I stand my assessment -- the recent...
17890
Gordon Raynal
feydmartha
Jan 2, 2005 1:43 pm
Hi Steve, ... The question: Why "the creeps?" Comments: 1. If Mark is what we have, then in principle no historical research can be done. One has to have...
17891
Bob MacDonald
drmacdonald_...
Jan 2, 2005 3:02 pm
... other details<< In prep for the Ludeman seminar and as a part of my random walk through the maze of Xtalk, I am reading Dunn, Christology in the Making. I...
17892
Mike Grondin
mwgrondin
Jan 2, 2005 5:32 pm
... Don't know what "communities" you have in mind, but could they have been any more zoo-y on end-times ferment than Paul? Or where do you see him correcting...
17893
sdavies0
Jan 2, 2005 6:13 pm
Gordon Raynal wrote: "The question: Why "the creeps?"" All of this effort going into a project that seems to be hopeless is creepy. Or at least it seems...
17894
siguiriya@...
mishima666
Jan 3, 2005 2:08 am
Bob Schacht writes: I'm not of a mind to suggest that Christianity would be *totally* debunked if the historical Jesus turns out to be radically different from...
17895
Loren Rosson
rossoiii
Jan 3, 2005 12:09 pm
... No, you didn't make this up. Donald Akenson uses the same "mashal", as he calls it, on p 174 of Saint Saul. (He agrees with you that the synoptics are...
17896
John C. Poirier
johncpoirier
Jan 3, 2005 12:51 pm
Steve, Thanks for your clarification of "creepy", but it brings up an interesting question about your denigration of Sanders's view. You wrote: "[I]sn39;t it ...
17897
Loren Rosson
rossoiii
Jan 3, 2005 1:00 pm
... You're right, John. The eschatological prophet who looked for the restoration of Israel, obedient to Torah, does not square with Sanders' own breed of ...
17898
Gordon Raynal
feydmartha
Jan 3, 2005 3:44 pm
... Hi Mike, With the note that I think individual communities were in themselves diverse (note Paul dealing with at least four "I belong to" groups in Corinth...
17899
Gordon Raynal
feydmartha
Jan 3, 2005 4:21 pm
Hi Steve, ... I agree that this is the meat of the matter. But as for Jesus, looking across the resources I think we can sketch out the core of his ...
17900
sdavies0
Jan 3, 2005 4:58 pm
... interesting > question about your denigration of Sanders's view. You wrote: "[I]sn39;t it> creepy how everybody knows that people make their image of Jesus...
17901
sdavies0
Jan 3, 2005 5:03 pm
... I've heard this term before but I've never understood it. What does the "restoration" of Israel mean? If someone can explain it, please do so on the level...
17902
SteveBlack
steveblack44
Jan 3, 2005 5:19 pm
... As a quick off the cuff answer - wouldn't it simply mean returning to the country her sovereignty? In other words getting those pesky Romans out of the...
17903
Loren Rosson
rossoiii
Jan 3, 2005 5:38 pm
... Basically the gathering of the twelve tribes under particular disciples (who in turn answer to Jesus the "viceroy"); a heaven on earth where peace and...
17904
Rikk Watts
rikkwatts
Jan 3, 2005 5:57 pm
Steve, Have you had a look at Jimmy Dunn's summary in JESUS REMEMBERED, pp. 260-65, 393-404 (though I have doubts about his overly rigid conceptualizing of a ...
17905
John C. Poirier
johncpoirier
Jan 3, 2005 6:29 pm
... I'll meet you half way, Steve, or maybe more than half way, because your basic point is a good one: ignoring Thomas, in this day, is inexcusable, ...