Hi, Gary.

I see that Paul asked the question, "I wonder if [Gary] will have the
integrity to apologise for that error?", referring to the fact that
you ignored the third proposition example I stated, which was:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/creationism/message/5237

> Proposition: The geological features of earth impact craters
> prove that the earth has been in existence for millions of years.
>
> Affirm: Todd S. Greene
> Deny: Gary Smith

Instead, you continue to lie when you write, "Now, who will sign a
proposition concerning the geological impact of the flood and the age
of the earth. UH --huh. Still silence only."

So your clear answer to Paul's question is: Absolutely not!

Regards,
Todd S. Greene
http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Thebes/7755/


###### Gary Smith ######
> Paul Andrew King <paul@m...> wrote:
[snip]
>> It is clearly not lacking in precision - and if I were to
>> criticise it, it would be to point out that it is trivially
>> false and that Todd would win without any significant debate.
>> So far as I can see Gary's claim is a strong indication that he
>> paid no attention at all to what the propositions actually were
>> (which would explain how he managed to miss the fact that the
>> third was explicitly about the age of the Earth - I wonder if he
>> will have the integrity to apologise for that error?)
>>
>> Paul K.
>
> -- I have no problem, since I didn't clarify myself, thus I have
> done so here. Now, who will sign a proposition concerning the
> geological impact of the flood and the age of the earth.
> UH --huh. Still silence only. I am not surprised.------Gary
>
> I am not interested in discussing the age of the universe
> because I do not claim that it is young--neither do I claim that
> it is old. The challenge is for someone to discuss publicly the
> age of the earth and the geological impact of the flood. It is
> eveident that no one is up to the task. I have made several posts
> stating that I am not in disagreement with others on the age of
> the universe, so why would I discuss that with which I am in no
> disagreement. As I stated before I do not believe that Marion
> contends for a young universe, but of that I am not sure. He can
> speak for himself.