Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
com-prac · Communities of Practice
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Real people. Real stories. See how Yahoo! Groups impacts members worldwide.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
CoPs Revisited   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #4795 of 8305 |

After a few months' absence, I rejoined Com-Prac and noticed right
away links to a couple of articles. One was Wenger's "doughnut" paper
and the other was Haldane & Bond's paper on the use of KALiF. Reading
them reminded me of Tom Stewart's 1996 cautions against using a heavy
hand to exploit CoPs. (Here, by the way, is a link to Tom's paper
from the Fortune archives.)

http://home.att.net/~discon/KM/invisible_key.htm

As I reflected on what I'd read, I was reminded of something taught me
by an wise old woman named Susan Markle. Susan was of the opinion
that nothing is quite so good as a good example. In trying to come up
with a good example of a CoP, one that illustrates sensible support
without getting heavy-handed, one that illustrates a sound, valuable
role for information technology (without bastardizing the CoP and
making it an "IT thing"), one that clearly demonstrates the value of
CoPs, and one that satisfies what I consider to be the criteria of a
true CoP, the only one that comes immediately to mind is the oft-cited
Xerox copier technicians and Xerox's Eureka system. (Here is a link
to a PARC commentary about Eureka.)

http://www.parc.com/research/spl/projects/commknowledge/eureka.html

I was wondering if list members might point to any other "good
examples" of CoPs, ones that are of equal quality to that of Xerox's
copier technicians?

Regards,

Fred Nickols
nickols@...
www.nickols.us










Thu Dec 9, 2004 12:53 pm

fwnickols
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #4795 of 8305 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

After a few months' absence, I rejoined Com-Prac and noticed right away links to a couple of articles. One was Wenger's "doughnut" paper and the other was...
Fred Nickols
fwnickols
Offline Send Email
Dec 9, 2004
4:58 pm

For me CoP's wholly ring true when they are anchored in context, identity, situation. They put this first above general MBA metrics etc and that kind of...
chris macrae
wcbn007
Offline Send Email
Dec 10, 2004
2:05 am

Hi All, On the 9th December Fred Nicholls posted a request for examples of 'non-bastardised' CoPs without the 'IT' thing. Some examples appear below but before...
plbond
plawtonbond
Offline Send Email
Jan 7, 2005
6:58 pm

Peter, ... I'm curious and would like to understand why you call it "bastardising" and how you mean it. Thanx Ro' -- "Don't be so open minded that your brain...
Rosanna Tarsiero
gionnetto
Offline Send Email
Jan 7, 2005
11:59 pm

Ro' I just borrowed the phrase from Fred Nicholls' original posting (9th December). I took it to mean that he thought all the IT emphasis we see these days is...
plbond
plawtonbond
Offline Send Email
Jan 10, 2005
10:41 am

Hi to Fred, Pete, Ro, et al, I've been following this thread as a legitimate peripheral participator (aka lurker). In the beginning Fred asked for examples of...
John M Harvey
john34harvey
Offline Send Email
Jan 13, 2005
4:13 pm

Hi John, Welcome in from the cold. I was gladdened by your response, which triggered these thoughts. Lave and Wenger stress that CoPs are everywhere, but...
plbond
plawtonbond
Offline Send Email
Jan 14, 2005
9:40 am
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help