This group is established to "take on" the discussions that don't quite "fit" into our apologetics groups (ACTS and BattleACTS). This group will be relatively unmoderated and adhere to similar rules as BattleACTS, namely:
1) Document yourself or retract.
A request to "document or retract" must be accompanied with a logical reason why you're making the request. Merely stating "document or retract" without reason can be ignored.
2) No profanity.
3) Any message that contains a direct (negative) personal assertion toward another person, on or off this list, must have the words "Ad Hom" in the beginning of the subject.
4) If statements are made and stated as facts, be prepared to submit one's self to rule 1. If you're only stating your opinion on a given matter, clearly indicate so (opinions can be dismissed).
5) Requests for the moderator to consider moderating someone should be made in private to the list owner/moderator.
Unless the need for more rules arises, we'll leave it at that.
This group is hosted through the http:\\www.americancatholictruthsociety.com - the American Catholic Truth Society (ACTS)
The Catholic Debate Forum is dedicated to the Lord Jesus Christ as a place to defend the Church He built upon that Rock (Petros). The purpose of the Catholic Debate Forum (CDF) is to answer respectful questions and challenges put before us. If you can participate with us in the true spirit of 1 Peter 3:15, then you will be a welcome guest and participant.
Would like some feedback regarding St. Mark's Gospel and the words of the concecration being changed from "many" to "all" The form or formula of Consecration
... Response: Then, by all means, lets look at the evidence. Here is the applicable portion of the Council of Trent's Decree on Original Sin: "….following
Speaking of the natives in Africa, I wonder how Yazzix is doing. But I doubt that there are any who have never heard. If Jesus really is what John 1 says he
Baby 'baptism' is abolished long ago, since it never was baptism to begin with ... From: Descartes326 <descartes326@...> Subject: Re: [CDF] Re: stain of