This will be the first topic to launch the discussion list managed by members of the Apostolate for Catholic Truth. Whether you are Catholic, Protestant or...
3
patty sarver
sarver@...
Jun 4, 1999 1:25 am
Hello catholicact, i'm having a problem with this because i was never aware that the Catholic Church condemned Protestantism.if by condemn you mean declare...
4
t_robs@...
Jun 6, 1999 5:31 am
Hi Benedict, I don't think the topic is clearly mentioned in this post (oh yes u mentioned in the email though, but when you type it here at the subject row,...
5
Benedict Tang
bentang@...
Jun 6, 1999 8:36 am
The topic once again is: "Does the Catholic Church still condemns Protestanism?" The webpage you gave contains some theological mistakes abt the Catholic ...
6
patty sarver
sarver@...
Jun 6, 1999 11:09 am
Hello catholicact, will try to keep this as short as possible but it's a pretty hefty subject. Luther was excommunicated. This was ipso facto anyway since he...
7
patty sarver
sarver@...
Jun 6, 1999 11:37 am
Hello catholicact, I want to make this clear: the previous post was not a condemnation of Prot. just disagreement. i maintain..as does the Church..that...
8
Andrew Kong
andrewk@...
Jun 8, 1999 1:34 am
Dear Patty I think the Catholic Church did condemn Protestantism in her canons of the Council of Trent; esp Can 9: If anyone says that the sinner is justified...
9
Benedict Tang
bentang@...
Jun 8, 1999 5:47 pm
Another topic of discussion is being opened simutaneously, which is titled "I'm not Protestant, I'm Christian." This had been a common response I'm sure you...
10
dannyhgl@...
Jun 9, 1999 6:54 am
Hi everyone,
I think the Church did condemn Protestantism in her canons as these new
doctrines during the Reformation were viewed as drawing people away from...
11
dannyhgl@...
Jun 9, 1999 4:16 pm
Hi Benedict,
Actually, I interact with quite a number of Protestant Christians at work but I have not encounter many that do not accept the Protestant...
12
patty sarver
sarver@...
Jun 9, 1999 6:34 pm
Hello Benedict,
Tuesday, June 08, 1999, 1:45:26 PM, you wrote:
BT> Another topic of discussion is being opened simutaneously, which is
BT> titled "I'm not...
13
patty sarver
sarver@...
Jun 10, 1999 3:15 am
Hello catholicact,
"mere Christianity"
anyone here read the trialouge?
probably explains this phenomenon better than anything.
Best regards,
patty...
14
Benedict Tang
bentang@...
Jun 11, 1999 6:25 pm
The Trialogue is at http://www.onebody.org/trilogue.htm
Please remember that the Trialogue is fiction, thus is not at all
authoratative in any sense.
Please...
15
Jonathan Koh
jonathankoh@...
Jun 25, 1999 7:05 pm
Dear List, I have a few things to say about yesterday's dialogue and also my
earlier discussion with Benedict and Andrew.
Firstly, i had a really enjoyable...
16
Patty Sarver
sarver@...
Jun 26, 1999 12:14 am
Jesus can neither be deceived or deceive.
what we ought to be searching for is not "whose right"...but what is truth.
and to search for truth and to believe...
17
Patty Sarver
sarver@...
Jun 26, 1999 12:15 am
we don't seperate tradition and scripture since they BOTH come from the same
source. i think some problems arise there. in thinking that it must be one
or the...
18
Jonathan Koh
jonathankoh@...
Jun 26, 1999 3:05 am
Patty wrote:
> we have been right all along.
My previous mail was meant to encourage us all - Protestants and Catholics
on the list to be open to learn from...
19
Andrew Kong
andrewk@...
Jun 26, 1999 5:13 pm
Dear Jonathan
You write well (and long too) and I truly appreciate your openness and
sincerety; I hope that by explaining my position in this ecumenical...
21
Benedict Tang
bentang@...
Jun 27, 1999 2:24 pm
Mr Ngiam, I have taken the liberty to repost your message to the ACT discussion
list so as to involve more people in this dialogue. Clayton's reply has also...
22
Vincent Hor
vhss@...
Jun 27, 1999 2:26 pm
Hi,
I am Vincent, a RC. I am heartened by your openess and would be
glad to have religious dialogues with you.
God Bless,
Vincent...
23
Jonathan Koh
jonathankoh@...
Jun 27, 1999 3:10 pm
Andrew wrote:
>To begin, I do not think it is necessary for either party to insist on a
>condition that both parties may be wrong
Dear Andrew, thank you for...
24
Patty Sarver
sarver@...
Jun 27, 1999 4:53 pm
i think we have to differentiate between the Church can be wrong and I can
be wrong.
why would anyone wish to participate in a church that is wrong in...
25
Patty Sarver
sarver@...
Jun 27, 1999 5:03 pm
what i see here is that the Prot view is that to be obedeint to the
magesterium of the Church is not to permit a direct communication w/ Holy
Spirit.
Benedict...
26
Patty Sarver
sarver@...
Jun 27, 1999 5:11 pm
speaking honestly, i do not actively seek for anyone to convert.
and i do not intend to convert.
if someone has discussion and he still is not convinced then...
27
Patty Sarver
sarver@...
Jun 27, 1999 5:20 pm
i think it is very presumptuos to say this:
the truth shall set you free.
you are assuming that RC is not free.
and that is not true!
PAX
patty
----- Original...
28
Benedict Tang
bentang@...
Jun 27, 1999 8:09 pm
I would like to clarify my position when I agreed to pray with Tee Lim.
Mr Ngiam's email had cleverly twisted the words of the situation then,
which now would...
29
Andrew Kong
andrewk@...
Jun 28, 1999 1:32 am
Jonathan Koh wrote:
Andrew wrote:
>To begin, I do not think it is necessary for either party to insist on
a
>condition that both parties may be wrong
Dear...
30
R_EE
R_EE@...
Jun 28, 1999 1:40 am
I agree that first and foremost, we all desire to be true disciples of ONE LORD and MASTER, and worship JESUS THE CHRIST. As He has commanded, let...
31
Patty Sarver
sarver@...
Jun 28, 1999 3:26 am
if anyone here wishes to have a real dialouge and honest discussion without the forgone conclusion that either side is "wrong" then i'll be glad to be open to...
32
APBL - Ngiam Tee Lim
teelim.ngiam@...
Jun 28, 1999 3:49 am
Dear All,
What I said took place in the kopitiam is in full accordance with the way
Benedict has described it (see his words below) - no more, no less: >...
