I don't recall the exact definition used, (or even if a specific definition was given), in the article but it definitely leaned towards your model 1 below...
... ago to show the flaws in modern Darwinian Theory and the importance of the debate. Hi! What flaws specifically did you point out? I'm in a stage where I'm...
... I don't have the details of what I discussed available right now but some of them were: --The use of vestigial characteristics or organs as proof of ...
Chad, I would be interested in the number of times the author(s) invoked what I believe has become the "closer" for their argument: "God wouldn't have done it...
Ironically, the flaws you pointed out are among the realities I hold to. For instance, though there is seems to be some remaining chemical purpose to the...
These are all good points that I would like to address after I sit in Atlanta traffic for a couple of hours <sigh>. ... I think that is what they were meant to...
The problem I have with the use of vestigial organs as proof for evolution is not that I say they do not exist (although we agree that the appendix is no...
Rob ... Both CJ and Gary were providing valuable posts to the list, posts whose content I was glad to read. This was in stark contrast to the content provided...
An interesting thing about the article is that they attempted to defend the ideas that there is no need for God but ended up stating that there was no conflict...
Chad ... Can you elaborate on why you feel this way? The devil is in the details in matters such as this. Science ideally should look at the evidence and draw...
... useless) No we do not agree. Allow me to rephrase what I wrote so it's not misinterpreted: the appendix, since it exists in our body, leaves it's mark....
Monachus ... You seem to be saying that cells are more basic than full adults. As I understand it, no part of a human is an island. Included in evolution are...
... I think mostly because it is not repeatable. The philosophy of Naturalism has to be assumed and the evidence twisted to fit it. I don't think we (you or...
Tim, Maybe you did read when Rob recanted his decision to let me act as moderator because I used 'unseemly' language in an OFF-LIST post to one of the Corey...
... Thanks, Chad. One of the real problems in the "debate" (I put it this way because there is not much about the dialogue that qualifies as debate) on...
... What do you mean? Cells are more basic than full adults? ... evolution are the cells as well. Of course. Without an understanding of cytology (and...
... classroom in such a stealth way, all the while arguing that alternative theories such as intelligent design are stealth efforts by theists to bring God in...
... efforts ... You're missing the point. It is only via particular metaphysical positions on God that Darwinism can put forth an argument that offers ...
I would like to respond to your earlier post when I get more time. But for this post... What you are describing does nothing to prove evolution. You still ...
... peoples) abuse of that faith. ... Agree. But I use these extreme examples for a reason. Science, not faith, keeps faith honest. Faith is too subjective....
George, I believe that I agree with a great deal of what you said here. ... I whole-heartedly agree! God bids us to love him with all our mind. He does not...
... though faith is subjective, that there is a faith that IS TRUE (even if no one holds this faith)? Me: Yes. I believe there is a Truth (Reality?). It's...
Hey George, Do you remember who the bishop was? I would like to research that quote myself. Based on that definition of sin/evil, in your personal opinion how...
... quote myself. Well, my friend quoted Bishop Pacian, who was the bishop of Barcelona from 370 a.D. to 390 a.D. Though we don't know exactly when he was ...
Chad ... The formation of the Earth is not repeatable by humans. Should we reject that? Such an approach seems to reject all of science. What about gravity?...
Sorry for the delay in reply. I was off of work yesterday and being that I work with computers throughout the week, when I'm off I stay away from them. :) ...
... No, just as we should not reject the fact that there are such things as cormorants, cats and dogs. Their origin would not able to be proven by repeated...
This is not what I'm talking about at all. I mean that we can't go back in time repeatedly and WATCH "the fact" of evolution occur over and over again. The...
Having problems with message search?
Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.
