Imagine the cruelties these cute sled dog pups will
eventually experience in the Iditarod.
Contact information, email blocks and sample letter are below.
Please help end the barbaric treatment of dogs by sending protest emails to organizations that support the Iditarod. What happens to the dogs during the Iditarod includes death, paralysis, frostbite (where it hurts the most!), bleeding ulcers, bloody diarrhea, lung damage, pneumonia, ruptured discs, viral diseases, broken bones, torn muscles and tendons and sprains.
Dog beatings and whippings are common. During the 2007 Iditarod, eyewitnesses
reported that musher Ramy Brooks kicked, punched and beat his dogs with a ski
pole and a chain. Jim Welch says in his book Speed Mushing Manual, "A training device such as a whip is not cruel at all but is effective." "It is a common training device in use among dog mushers..."
Iditarod dog kennels are puppy mills. Mushers breed large numbers of dogs and
routinely kill unwanted ones, including puppies. Many dogs who are permanently disabled in the Iditarod, or who are unwanted for any reason are killed with a shot to the head, dragged, drowned or clubbed to death.
When they're not hauling people, most Iditarod dogs are forced to live at the end of a chain. It has been reported that dogs who don't make the main team are never taken off-chain. Chained dogs have been attacked by wolves, bears and other animals. Old and arthritic dogs suffer terrible pain in the blistering cold.
Most Internet service providers allow people to send up to 40 email addresses
at a time. For your convenience, the addresses have been divided into groups
of 40. Please email the first group first. Individual email addresses are
given under the sample letter. The groups contain addresses for the Iditarod
sponsors, promoters, and the sponsors of the 73 mushers who signed up for the 2009
Iditarod. Email blocks with semicolons are on http://www.helpsleddogsorg/sponsors.htm .
Please end your organization's support of the Iditarod dog sled race. For the
dogs, this event is a bottomless pit of suffering. What happens to the dogs during the Iditarod includes death, paralysis, frostbite (where it hurts the most!), bleeding ulcers, bloody diarrhea, lung damage, pneumonia, ruptured discs, viral diseases, broken bones, torn muscles and tendons and sprains. At least 136 dogs have died in the race. No one knows how many dogs die after this tortuous ordeal or during training. For more
facts about the Iditarod, visit the Sled Dog Action Coalition website, http://www.helpsleddogs.org .
On average, 53 percent of the dogs who start the race do not make it across
the finish line. According to a report published in the American Journal of
Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, of those who do finish, 81 percent have
lung damage. A report published in the Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine
said that 61 percent of the dogs who complete the Iditarod have ulcers versus
zero percent pre-race.
Iditarod dog kennels are puppy mills. Mushers breed large numbers of dogs and
routinely kill unwanted ones, including puppies. Many dogs who are
permanently disabled in the Iditarod, or who are unwanted for any reason, including
those who have outlived their usefulness, are killed with a shot to the head,
dragged, drowned or clubbed to death. "Dogs are clubbed with baseball bats and if
they don't pull are dragged to death in harnesses....." wrote former Iditarod
dog handler Mike Cranford in an article for Alaska's Bush Blade Newspaper.
Dog beatings and whippings are common. During the 2007 Iditarod, eyewitnesses
reported that musher Ramy Brooks kicked, punched and beat his dogs with a ski
pole and a chain. Jim Welch says in his book Speed Mushing Manual, "Nagging a
dog team is cruel and ineffective...A training device such as a whip is not
cruel at all but is effective." "It is a common training device in use among
dog mushers..."
Jon Saraceno wrote in his March 3, 2000 column in USA Today, "He [Colonel Tom
Classen] confirmed dog beatings and far worse. Like starving dogs to maintain
their most advantageous racing weight. Skinning them to make mittens. Or
dragging them to their death."
During the race, veterinarians do not give the dogs physical exams at every
checkpoint. Mushers speed through many checkpoints, so the dogs get the
briefest visual checks, if that. Instead of pulling sick dogs from the race,
veterinarians frequently give them massive doses of antibiotics to keep them running.
Most Iditarod dogs are forced to live at the end of a chain when they aren't
hauling people around. It has been reported that dogs who don't make the main
team are never taken off-chain. Chained dogs have been attacked by wolves,
bears and other animals. Old and arthritic dogs suffer terrible pain in the
blistering cold.
Please end your organization's association with this horrific race.
Teamster Local 959
Email: rtraini@...
Usibelli Coal Mine
Email: info@...
Homer Stage Line
Email: hsl@...
Basin Electric Power Cooperative
Email: frobb@...
Please send protest emails and forward this alert.
From the Sled Dog Action Coalition, http://www.helpsleddogs.org Contact information, emails and sample letter are below.
In its February 29 press release, the World Wildlife Fund announced that it's sponsoring Iditarod race winner Martin Buser in the 2008 Iditarod. The World Wildlife Fund claims that Buser loves and cares about his dogs. But one of Buser's dogs died in the Iditarod from "internal hemorrhage." Buser holds the speed record in the race. A newspaper reported that he "wants to accelerate the pace even more." To read the World Wildlife Fund release: http://www.panda.org/news_facts/newsroom/index.cfm?uNewsID=125880
Please send protest emails to the World Wildlife Fund:
Please end your organization's support Martin Buser and the Iditarod dog sled race. For the dogs, this event is a bottomless pit of suffering. What happens to the dogs during the Iditarod includes death, paralysis, penile frostbite, bleeding ulcers, bloody diarrhea, lung damage, pneumonia, ruptured discs, viral diseases, broken bones, torn muscles and tendons, sprains, torn footpads and anemia. One of Buser's dogs died in the Iditarod from "internal hemorrhage." At least 133 dogs have died in the race. No one knows how many dogs die after this tortuous ordeal or during training. For more facts about the Iditarod, visit the Sled Dog Action Coalition website, http://www.helpsleddogs.org .
On average, 53 percent of the dogs who start the race do not make it across the finish line. According to a report published in the American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, of those who do finish, 81 percent have lung damage. A report published in the Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine said that 61 percent of the dogs who complete the Iditarod have ulcers versus zero percent pre-race.
Iditarod dog kennels are puppy mills. Mushers breed large numbers of dogs and routinely kill unwanted ones, including puppies. Many dogs who are permanently disabled in the Iditarod, or who are unwanted for any reason, including those who have outlived their usefulness, are killed with a shot to the head, dragged, drowned or clubbed to death. "Dogs are clubbed with baseball bats and if they don't pull are dragged to death in harnesses....." wrote former Iditarod dog handler Mike Cranford in an article for Alaska's Bush Blade Newspaper.
Dog beatings and whippings are common. During the 2007 Iditarod, eyewitnesses reported that musher Ramy Brooks kicked, punched and beat his dogs with a ski pole and a chain. Jim Welch says in his book Speed Mushing Manual, "Nagging a dog team is cruel and ineffective...A training device such as a whip is not cruel at all but is effective." "It is a common training device in use among dog mushers..."
Jon Saraceno wrote in his March 3, 2000 column in USA Today, "He [Colonel Tom Classen] confirmed dog beatings and far worse. Like starving dogs to maintain their most advantageous racing weight. Skinning them to make mittens. Or dragging them to their death."
During the race, veterinarians do not give the dogs physical exams at every checkpoint. Mushers speed through many checkpoints, so the dogs get the briefest visual checks, if that. Instead of pulling sick dogs from the race, veterinarians frequently give them massive doses of antibiotics to keep them running.
Most Iditarod dogs are forced to live at the end of a chain when they aren't hauling people around. It has been reported that dogs who don't make the main team are never taken off-chain. Chained dogs have been attacked by wolves, bears and other animals. Old and arthritic dogs suffer terrible pain in the blistering cold.
Please end your organization's association with this horrific race and Martin Buser.
************** Ideas to please picky eaters. Watch video on AOL Living. (http://living.aol.com/video/how-to-please-your-picky-eater/rachel-campos-duffy/2050827?NCID=aolcmp00300000002598)
The Washington Post article was meant for children to read. Notice that dogs dying is the LAST fact on their list. The dogs do not get physical exams at all the checkpoints. Mushers race through many of the checkpoints so vets only give the dogs quick visual checks, if that.
Tuesday, March 7, 2006; Page C14 For Iditarod Racers, No Place Like Nome
And they're off!
Eighty-three teams of mushers and dogs set off last weekend on the Iditarod Trail Sled Dog Race. The winning team will cover more than 1,100 miles in nine or 10 days.
Here are some facts about the famous race:
· The first Iditarod from Anchorage to Nome, Alaska, was run in 1973. It is run, in part, to remember a lifesaving sled dog relay in 1925 that sent much-needed medicine from Anchorage to Nome.
· The musher is the person who drives the dog sled. Author Gary Paulsen, in his third Iditarod, dropped out of the race yesterday morning.
· Each sled dog team has 12 to 16 dogs. Many of the dogs used are malamute and Siberian huskies, although other dog types are used.
· Dogs are actually faster than horses over long distances. They can average 8 to 12 miles an hour for hundreds of miles.
· Iditarod is an Indian word that means either "distant place" or "clear water."
· Because the cold, snow and distance can be hard on the dogs, there are about 35 veterinarians to care for the animals during the race. However, dogs have died during the race.
Please help the Iditarod dogs by sending protest emails to race supporters. These dogs are helpless victims of profoundly inhumane treatment and cannot speak for themselves. A list of what happens to them during the Iditarod includes death, paralysis, penile frostbite, bleeding ulcers, broken bones, pneumonia, torn muscles and tendons, diarrhea, vomiting, hypothermia, fur loss, broken teeth, viral diseases, torn footpads, ruptured discs, sprains, anemia and lung damage.
How do sick animals run the 1,100 miles across frozen tundra and through icy waters? Veterinarians give them massive doses of antibiotics to keep them going. Anemia tires the dogs but mushers force them to run mile after grueling mile. No one knows how many dogs die after this tortuous ordeal or during training.
Please send protest emails to race supporters using the list below of organizations that are 2006 Iditarod race sponsors, musher sponsors, or Iditarod promoters. Emails are first given in block form and then individually under the sample letter. Email addresses with semi-colons in block form can be found at http://www.helpsleddogs.org/sponsors.htm on the bottom of the page.
ALL EMAIL ADDRESSES - for easy sending, copy and paste as a bunch into your "Blind Copy" box:
Please stop supporting the barbaric Iditarod dog sled race. Mushers treat their dogs abominably. In the Iditarod, dogs are forced to run 1,150 miles, which is the approximate distance between Miami, Florida and New York City, over a grueling terrain in 8 to 15 days. USA Today sports columnist Jon Saraceno called the Iditarod "a travesty of grueling proportions" and "Ihurtadog." Fox sportscaster Jim Rome called it "I-killed-a-dog." Orlando Sentinel sports columnist George Diaz said the race is "a barbaric ritual" and "an illegal sweatshop for dogs."
Iditarod dogs are simply not the invincible animals race officials portray. Here's a short list of what happens to the dogs during the race: death, paralysis, penile frostbite, bleeding ulcers, broken bones, pneumonia, torn muscles and tendons, diarrhea, vomiting, hypothermia, fur loss, broken teeth, viral diseases, torn footpads, ruptured discs, sprains, anemia and lung damage.
How do sick animals run the 1,100 miles across frozen tundra and through icy waters? Veterinarians give them massive doses of antibiotics to keep them going. Anemia tires the dogs but mushers force them to run mile after grueling mile.
At least 126 dogs have died in the Iditarod. No one knows how many dogs die after this tortuous ordeal or during training.
On average, 53 percent of the dogs who start the race do not make it across the finish line. According to a report published in the American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, of those who do cross, 81 percent have lung damage. A report published in the Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine said that 61 percent of the dogs who finish the Iditarod have ulcers versus zero percent pre-race.
Tom Classen, retired Air Force colonel and Alaskan resident for over 40 years, tells us that the dogs are beaten into submission:
"They've had the hell beaten out of them." "You don't just whisper into their ears, 'OK, stand there until I tell you to run like the devil.' They understand one thing: a beating. These dogs are beaten into submission the same way elephants are trained for a circus. The mushers will deny it. And you know what? They are all lying." -USA Today, March 3, 2000 in Jon Saraceno's column.
Mushers believe in "culling" or killing unwanted dogs, including puppies. Many dogs who are permanently disabled in the Iditarod, or who are unwanted for any reason, including those who have outlived their usefulness, are killed with a shot to the head, dragged or clubbed to death. "Dogs are clubbed with baseball bats and if they don't pull are dragged to death in harnesses....." wrote Alaskan Mike Cranford in an article for Alaska's Bush Blade Newspaper (March, 2000).
Jon Saraceno wrote in his March 3, 2000 column in USA Today, "He [Colonel
Tom Classen] confirmed dog beatings and far worse. Like starving dogs to maintain their most advantageous racing weight. Skinning them to make mittens. Or dragging them to their death."
Please end your organization's association with this horrific race.
PLEASE CROSSPOST
From the Sled Dog Action Coalition, http://www.helpsleddogs.org
Rachael Scdoris, the legally blind woman who raced in the 2005
Iditarod, will be grand marshal of the Starlight Parade presented by
Southwest Airlines, according to an announcement made by the Portland
Rose Festival. People who participate in Iditarod brutalities don't
deserve honors.
Four dogs died in the 2005 Iditarod and countless others became sick
and were injured. Scdoris' own dogs caught a virus with accompanying
diarrhea and refused to eat.
On average, 53 percent of the dogs who start the race do not make it
across the finish line. According to a report published in the
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, of those
who do cross, 81 percent have lung damage. A report published in the
Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine said that 61 percent of the
dogs who finish the Iditarod have ulcers versus zero percent pre-race.
Ask the Portland Rose Festival and Southwest Airlines to pick another
parade marshal.
EMAIL: info@..., editors@...,
kim.wren@..., dan.mckee@...
SAMPLE LETTER TO PERSONALIZE:
Dear Mr. Buttice, Ms. Bladow and Mr. Kelly:
I understand the Starlight Parade presented by Southwest Airlines
will feature Rachael Scdoris, the legally blind woman who
participated in the Iditarod. By selecting Scdoris, you are
supporting and promoting this horrific race and the many evils
associated with it. Please find another grand marshal for the
Starlight Parade.
In the Iditarod, dogs are forced to run 1,150 miles, which is the
approximate distance between Portland and Bismarck, ND, over a
grueling terrain in 8 to 15 days. USA Today sports columnist Jon
Saraceno called the Iditarod "a travesty of grueling proportions"
and "Ihurtadog." Fox sportscaster Jim Rome called it "I-killed-a-
dog." Orlando Sentinel sports columnist George Diaz said the race
is "an illegal sweatshop for dogs." USA Today business columnist
Bruce Horovitz said the race is a "public-relations minefield."
Please visit the Sled Dog Action Coalition website
http://www.helpsleddogs.org and be sure to read the quotes on
http://www.helpsleddogs.org/remarks.htm . All the material on the
site is true and verifiable.
At least 126 dogs have died in the Iditarod, including four who died
in 2005 race. There is no official count of dog deaths available for
the race's early years. Here's a short list of what happens to the
dogs during the race: death, paralysis, penile frostbite, bleeding
ulcers, broken bones, pneumonia, ruptured discs, hypothermia, broken
teeth, viral diseases, torn footpads and lung damage. Scdoris' own
dogs caught a virus with accompanying diarrhea and refused to eat.
On average, 53 percent of the dogs who start the race do not make it
across the finish line. According to a report published in the
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, of those
who do cross, 81 percent have lung damage. A report published in the
Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine said that 61 percent of the
dogs who finish the Iditarod have ulcers versus zero percent pre-race.
Tom Classen, retired Air Force colonel and Alaskan resident for over
40
years, tells us that the dogs are beaten into submission:
"They've had the hell beaten out of them." "You don't just whisper
into their ears, 'OK, stand there until I tell you to run like the
devil.' They understand one thing: a beating. These dogs are beaten
into submission the same way elephants are trained for a circus. The
mushers will deny it. And you know what? They are all lying." -USA
Today, March 3, 2000 in Jon Saraceno's column
Mushers believe in "culling" or killing unwanted dogs, including
puppies. Many dogs who are permanently disabled in the Iditarod, or
who are unwanted for any reason, including those who have outlived
their usefulness are killed with a shot to the head, dragged or
clubbed to death. "Dogs are clubbed with baseball bats and if they
don't pull are dragged to death in harnesses....." wrote Alaskan Mike
Cranford in an article for Alaska's Bush Blade Newspaper (March,
2000).
Jon Saraceno wrote in his March 3, 2000 column in USA Today, "He
[Colonel
Tom Classen] confirmed dog beatings and far worse. Like starving dogs
to maintain their most advantageous racing weight. Skinning them to
make mittens. Or dragging them to their death."
Please stop supporting and promoting this barbaric race. Please do
not honor Scdoris by having her as your grand marshal.
Sincerely,
EMAIL ALL IDITAROD SUPPORTERS:
http://www.helpsleddogs.org/sponsors.htm
PLEASE CROSSPOST
From the Sled Dog Action Coalition, http://www.helpsleddogs.org
Wild Women Unite, a group that seeks to empower women, invited
Iditarod musher DeeDee Jonrowe to be a guest speaker at its
Wilderness Weekend, Sept. 16 to 19 in Pulaski, New York. In the 2002
Iditarod, Jonrowe's dog Mark died from a bleeding stomach ulcer. On
the All About Animals Radio Show, Dr. Paula Kislak, President of the
Association of Veterinarians for Animal Rights, said that before
Mark's ulcer ruptured there would have been signs that an ulcer was
present. He would have showed "a lack of interest in food, more
vomiting than normal, discomfort in the abdominal area."
Jonrowe has admitted having over 100 dogs chained on five foot
tethers in her kennel, sleeping on the sled while the dogs race and
breezing through checkpoints. When mushers blast through checkpoints,
the dogs do not get veterinary physical examinations.
Ask Yvonne Kopy and Annette Snedaker, the directors of Wild Women
Unite, to cancel Jonrowe's speech.
EMAILS: Yvonne@..., Annette@...
SAMPLE LETTER TO PERSONALIZE:
Dear Ms. Kopy and Ms. Snedaker:
I understand that Wild Women Unite invited Iditarod musher DeeDee
Jonrowe to speak at its Wild Women of the Wilderness Weekend. I hope
you will cancel her talk after reading the information I provide.
In the 2002 Iditarod, Jonrowe's dog Mark died from a bleeding ulcer.
In an interview on the All About Animals Radio Show, Dr. Paula
Kislak, President of the Association of Veterinarians for Animal
Rights, said that prior to Mark's ulcer rupturing there would have
been signs that an ulcer was present. He would have showed "a lack of
interest in food, more vomiting than normal, discomfort in the
abdominal area."
Jonrowe has admitted to having over 100 dogs tethered on 5 foot
chains in her kennel, sleeping on her sled while the dogs race and
breezing through check points. When mushers blast through check
points, the dogs do not get veterinary physical examinations.
In the Iditarod, dogs are forced to run 1,150 miles, which is the
approximate distance between Binghamton and Tampa, Florida, over a
grueling terrain in 8 to15 days. Dog deaths and injuries are common
in the race. USA Today sports columnist Jon Saraceno called the
Iditarod "a travesty of grueling proportions" and "Ihurtadog." Fox
sportscaster Jim Rome called it "I-killed-a-dog." Orlando Sentinel
sports columnist George Diaz said the race is "a barbaric ritual"
and "an illegal sweatshop for dogs." USA Today business columnist
Bruce Horovitz said the race is a "public-relations minefield."
Please visit the Sled Dog Action Coalition (SDAC) website
http://www.helpsleddogs.org to see pictures, and for more
information. Be sure to read the quotes on
http://www.helpsleddogs.org/remarks.htm. All of the material on the
site is true and verifiable.
At least 122 dogs have died in the Iditarod. There is no official
count of dog deaths available for the race's early years. Causes of
death have also included strangulation in towlines, internal
hemorrhaging after being gouged by a sled, liver injury, heart
failure, and pneumonia. "Sudden death" and "external myopathy," a
fatal condition in which a dog's muscles and organs deteriorate
during extreme or prolonged exercise, have also occurred.
In the 2001 Iditarod, a sick dog was sent to a prison to be cared for
by inmates and received no veterinary care. He was chained up in the
cold and died. Another dog died by suffocating on his own vomit. No
one knows how many dogs die in training or after the race each year.
On average, 54% of the dogs who start the race do not make it across
the finish line. According to a report published in the American
Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, of those who do
finish, 81% have lung damage.
Tom Classen, retired Air Force colonel and Alaskan resident for over
40 years, tells us that the dogs are beaten into submission:
"They've had the hell beaten out of them." "You don't just whisper
into their ears, `OK, stand there until I tell you to run like the
devil.' They understand one thing: a beating. These dogs are beaten
into submission the same way elephants are trained for a circus. The
mushers will deny it. And you know what? They are all lying." -USA
Today, March 3, 2000 in Jon Saraceno's column
Beatings and whippings are common. Jim Welch says in his book Speed
Mushing Manual, "I heard one highly respected [sled dog] driver once
state that "`Alaskans like the kind of dog they can beat
on.'" "Nagging a dog team is cruel and ineffective...A training
device such as a whip is not cruel at all but is effective." "It is a
common training device in use among dog mushers...A whip is a very
humane training tool."
Mushers believe in "culling" or killing unwanted dogs, including
puppies. Many dogs who are permanently disabled in the Iditarod, or
who are unwanted for any reason, are killed with a shot to the head,
dragged or clubbed to death. "On-going cruelty is the law of many dog
lots. Dogs are clubbed with baseball bats and if they don't pull are
dragged to death in harnesses....." wrote Alaskan Mike Cranford in an
article for Alaska's Bush Blade Newspaper (March, 2000).
Jon Saraceno wrote in his March 3, 2000 column in USA Today, "He
[Colonel Tom Classen] confirmed dog beatings and far worse. Like
starving dogs to maintain their most advantageous racing weight.
Skinning them to make mittens. Or dragging them to their death."
The Iditarod could not be legally held in most states because doing
so would violate animal cruelty laws. The California law's (§ 597)
description of a person who commits animal cruelty is typical: "Every
person who overdrives, overloads, drives when overloaded, overworks,
tortures, torments, deprives of necessary sustenance, drink, or
shelter, cruelly beats, mutilates, or cruelly kills any animal, or
causes or procures any animal to be so overdriven, overloaded, driven
when overloaded, overworked, tortured, tormented, deprived of
necessary sustenance, drink, shelter, or to be cruelly beaten,
mutilated, or cruelly killed...or otherwise uses the animal when
unfit for labor, is, for every such offense, guilty of a crime
punishable as a misdemeanor or as a felony or alternatively
punishable as a misdemeanor or a felony and by a fine of not more
than twenty thousand dollars ($20,000)."
The race has led to the proliferation of concentration-camp-like dog
kennels in which the dogs are treated very cruelly. Many kennels have
over 100 dogs and some have as many as 200. It is standard for the
dogs to spend their entire lives outside tethered to metal chains
that can be as short as four feet long. In 1997 the United States
Department of Agriculture determined that the tethering of dogs was
inhumane and not in the animals' best interests. The chaining of dogs
as a primary means of enclosure is prohibited in all cases where
federal law applies. A dog who is permanently tethered is forced to
urinate and defecate where he sleeps, which conflicts with his
natural instinct to eliminate away from his living area.
Iditarod dogs are unhappy prisoners with no chance of parole. Please
do not promote this barbaric race by having Jonrowe speak.
Sincerely,
PLEASE CROSSPOST
Several months ago, the Miami Herald Neighbor's Section stopped
publishing the pet column written by Susan Neuman, which gave
important information about animal companion issues in Miami and
elsewhere. Miami's shelters are often overpopulated. Yet, the Herald
also stopped regular publication of photos and information about dogs
and cats who need to be adopted. Neuman's column and the pet adoption
information encouraged people to treat animals humanely and to adopt.
Please ask the Miami Herald Neighbor's Section to reinstate these
features.
Email Judy Miller and Marika Lynch: jmiller@...,
mlynch@...
PLEASE CROSSPOST
From the Sled Dog Action Coalition, <A HREF="http://www.helpsleddogs.org/">
http://www.helpsleddogs.org</A>
Making Iditarod cruelties seem romantic, CBS News Sunday Morning, a national
TV program, said that mushers are "chasing the memory of a time when the
hearts of men and dogs were the most powerful engines in the land." Its website
describes the Iditarod as fun, and has a photo of the 2004 Iditarod race winner.
Their report did not mention any cruelites that the dogs endure or that two
dogs died in the 2004 race or that dogs were made to run for 12 hour stretches
without rest.
Please let CBS know that the Iditarod is a shamless, bloody business by
emailing the show's executive producer, Rand Morrison and Leslie Moonves, CEO of
CBS-TV. Sample letter is below email addresses.
EMAILS: leslie.moonves@..., sundays@...
Sample letter to personalize:
Dear Mr. Moonves and Mr. Morrison:
CBS News Sunday Morning made the cruelties of the Iditarod seem romantic by
saying that mushers are "chasing the memory of a time when the hearts of men
and dogs were the most powerful engines in the land." The show's website
describes the Iditarod as fun, and has a photo of the 2004 Iditarod race winner.
The
Iditarod is a shamless, bloody business. Please give your viewers and website
readers the animal protection side of the Iditarod story.
In the Iditarod, dogs are forced to run 1,150 miles, which is the approximate
distance between New York City and Miami, Florida, over a grueling terrain in
8 to 15 days. Dog deaths and injuries are common in the race. USA Today
sports columnist Jon Saraceno called the Iditarod "a travesty of grueling
proportions" and "Ihurtadog." Fox sportscaster Jim Rome called it
"I-killed-a-dog."
Orlando Sentinel sports columnist George Diaz said the race is "a barbaric
ritual" and "an illegal sweatshop for dogs." USA Today business columnist Bruce
Horovitz said the race is a "public-relations minefield."
Please visit the Sled Dog Action Coaliton website <A
HREF="http://www.helpsleddogs.org/">http://www.helpsleddogs.org</A> to see
pictures, and for more
information. Be sure to read the quotes on <A
HREF="http://www.helpsleddogs.org/remarks.htm">http://www.helpsleddogs.org/remar\
ks.htm</A> . All of the material
on the site is true and verifiable.
At least 122 dogs have died in the Iditarod. There is no official count of
dog deaths available for the race's early years. In "WinterDance: the Fine
Madness of Running the Iditarod," Gary Paulsen describes witnessing an Iditarod
musher brutally kicking a dog to death during the race. He wrote, "All the time
he was kicking the dog. Not with the imprecision of anger, the kicks, not kicks
to match his rage but aimed, clinical vicious kicks. Kicks meant to hurt
deeply, to cause serious injury. Kicks meant to kill."
Causes of death have also included strangulation in towlines, internal
hemorrhaging after being gouged by a sled, liver injury, heart failure, and
pneumonia. "Sudden death" and "external myopathy," a fatal condition in which a
dog's
muscles and organs deteriorate during extreme or prolonged exercise, have also
occurred.
In the 2001 Iditarod, a sick dog was sent to a prison to be cared for by
inmates and received no veterinary care. He was chained up in the cold and died.
Another dog died by suffocating on his own vomit. It is unknown how many dogs
die in training or after the race.
On average, 54% of the dogs who start the race do not make it across the
finish line. Of those that finish, 81% have lung damage.
Tom Classen, retired Air Force colonel and Alaskan resident for over 40
years, tells us that the dogs are beaten into submission:
"They've had the hell beaten out of them." "You don't just whisper into their
ears, ‘OK, stand there until I tell you to run like the devil.' They
understand one thing: a beating. These dogs are beaten into submission the same
way
elephants are trained for a circus. The mushers will deny it. And you know what?
They are all lying." -USA Today, March 3, 2000 in Jon Saraceno's column
Beatings and whippings are common. Jim Welch says in his book Speed Mushing
Manual, "I heard one highly respected [sled dog] driver once state that
"‘Alaskans like the kind of dog they can beat on.'" "Nagging a dog team is
cruel and
ineffective...A training device such as a whip is not cruel at all but is
effective." "It is a common training device in use among dog mushers...A whip is
a
very humane training tool."
Mushers believe in "culling" or killing unwanted dogs, including puppies.
Many dogs who are permanently disabled in the Iditarod, or who are unwanted for
any reason, are killed with a shot to the head, dragged or clubbed to death.
"On-going cruelty is the law of many dog lots. Dogs are clubbed with baseball
bats and if they don't pull are dragged to death in harnesses....." wrote
Alaskan Mike Cranford in an article for Alaska's Bush Blade Newspaper (March,
2000).
Jon Saraceno wrote in his March 3, 2000 column in USA Today, "He [Colonel Tom
Classen] confirmed dog beatings and far worse. Like starving dogs to maintain
their most advantageous racing weight. Skinning them to make mittens. Or
dragging them to their death."
The race has led to the proliferation of horrific dog kennels in which the
dogs are treated very cruelly. Many kennels have over 100 dogs and some have as
many as 200. It is standard for the dogs to spend their entire lives outside
tethered to metal chains that can be as short as four feet long. In 1997 the
United States Department of Agriculture determined that the tethering of dogs
was inhumane and not in the animals' best interests. The chaining of dogs as a
primary means of enclosure is prohibited in all cases where federal law
applies. A dog who is permanently tethered is forced to urinate and defecate
where he
sleeps, which conflicts with his natural instinct to eliminate away from his
living area.
Iditarod dogs are unhappy prisoners with no chance of parole. Your viewers
and readers deserve to know the truth about this cruel race.
Sincerely,
In six years, one female dog and her offspring can produce 67,000 puppies. A cat and her young can produce 420,000 kittens. Don't litter! SPAY/NEUTER your companion animals
1) IDITAROD , Background introduction, Two articles "Shameles/ bloody bu$ine$$ on
  the backs of man's best friends!!! "
2) WHAT JILL KNOWS,Piddling Poodle Puppy 3) CONGRESS CONSIDERS STEPS TO REDUCE ROADKILL
4) BREAKING NEWS From PETA.org
5) Dogs Adverse Reactions request
6) Update- Animal Sexual Abuse Arkansas Case- LETTERS NEEDED
NOTE:Animals In Print is fortunate and proud to have
Margery Glickman as a staff member
---------------------------------------------------------------
Victims of cold, fatigue and greed
By Bod Padecky
Press Democrat
March 20, 2004
A dog is there for the taking. He can't talk back. He can't say, stop, you're killing me, you're treating me like a dog. Six years ago, Margery Glickman happened upon a couple of hundred dogs that, if they could have spoken, would have said just that.
Glickman was vacationing in Alaska. She came for the scenery but saw instead a "dog farm." Animals were tethered to stakes by chains, belligerent in their confinement, drinking filthy water, sitting, as she said, "in their own fecal matter." This was a breeding place for the Iditarod. Glickman was perplexed.
Even back home in Miami, Glickman had heard of the Iditarod. It was a 1,149-mile dog sled race in the middle of winter across Alaska. Designed to commemorate the diphtheria run that saved lives in 1925, the Iditarod had become romantic legend, courageous mushers crossing forests, rivers, tundra and mountain ranges with enthusiastic canines. What glory! Ah, but where was the glory in this?
"I was appalled," she said.
Glickman had never been an activist in her life. She was a first-grade teacher. She was a mom. She was in Alaska to relax. Problem was, she couldn't.
"Of 300 dogs on a dog farm," Glickman said, "five might be judged good enough to run in the Iditarod. The rest? Most of them would be culled."
They would be killed, by clubs, by gunshot, by being dragged to death in harness. Some were skinned for parkas and mittens. Her indignation grew in direct proportion to her curiosity. Glickman found dogs working on exercise wheels, like hamsters. She found dogs with muscle tears, raw paws, hypothermia, dislocated joints, penile frostbite, fluid in legs and lungs.
The 32nd running of the Iditarod concludes this weekend, and though records weren't kept for the first 10 years of the race, Glickman now has counted 122 dogs who have died during the last 22 years. She was not alone in her disgust.
"With a buildup of lactic acid and other chemicals from muscle degradation as a result of extreme exercise," said Dr. Paula Kislak, President of the Association of Veterinarians for Animal Rights, "toxicity in the liver and kidneys may not cause death for days or weeks after a race."
So the 122 confirmed deaths?
"Adding the dogs who were culled, died in training and died after the race from complications," Dr. Kislak said, "the number is in the thousands. That is obscene. The race only is run for entertainment and to make money."
Greed is not confined to professional baseball players. The economic impact to Anchorage alone is estimated at $5 million. The Iditarod is a money-maker. Glickman, 56, has launched Sled Dog Action Coalition, a nonprofit volunteer-only organization. She has been so successful, sponsors like Pizza Hut, Pfizer and Costco have dropped out. She has received death threats, enough of them so that she doesn't go to Alaska.
"It is unconscionable," Glickman said. "They (mushers) say they love their dogs, but they don't love their dogs. It is an act of barbarism. It is a shameless, bloody business."
In the Iditarod, dogs are a car tire that goes flat. Just get another one. Except a car tire was never named Lassie or Ol' Yeller. A car tire never welcomed you home at night. A car tire never took the edge off feeling lonely. A car tire never played with the kids, and a kid never cried when the car tire died.
If a dog is man's best friend, this is not how you treat your best friend. You don't push him so hard he can't even exhale to vomit but instead chokes on it while falling down.
And as he watches his dog writhe on the ground, what can the musher possibly say that would even remotely make this sight worthwhile?
IDITAROD - shameles/ bloody bu$ine$$ on the backs of man's best friends!!!Â
The romantics [sled racing dog owners (read:mercenaries!)] pretend this is some extension of a Jack London novel. Hell no. This is a not-so-novel Jack The Ripper crime against man's best friend. It sullies the meaning of sport.
In addition to fluid in the lungs, bleeding stomach ulcers occur, as does general cramping, dislocations, fractures, muscle and tendon tears, tendinitis, dehydration, hypothermia, raw paws, penile frostbite and viruses.>> [To say nothing of the dogs' MENTAL agony...]
Â
Two anti-Iditarod articles
This email contains two anti-Iditarod articles:
What Iditarod Does To Dogs Is True March Madness
by Jeff Jacobs
Hartford Courant
March 18, 2004
Jonathan XII, a 3-year-old white Siberian Husky who loves to be petted, lives a comfortable lifestyle at an unidentified location 20 minutes from the UConn campus. The shroud of secrecy is necessary, his handler Karen Landwehr said, to prevent merry pranksters from Rhode Island and other rival schools from kidnapping the mascot of our state university.
Personally, I'm not buying the explanation.
I'm convinced Jonathan, the noble heir to a tradition that dates to 1934, is being hidden so he is not drafted into the annual war against dogs. Surely you've heard of the 1,100-mile death march from Anchorage to Nome. It's the grotesque spectacle that alternately bills itself as Alaska's great race and the world's premier dog-sled race.
USA Today columnist Jon Saraceno once called it the "Ihurtadog."
Sportscaster Jim Rome upped the ante to "I-killed-a-dog sled race."
Nothing trumps death, so just paint me thrilled that the 32nd Iditarod finally, mercifully will end this week.
Early Wednesday morning, Mitch Seavey, 44, won the first prize of $69,000 and a new Dodge pickup truck - hey, a man needs space to cart away his carcasses - by crossing the finish line behind his eight canine slaves in a time of nine days, 12 hours, 20 minutes and 22 seconds.
His dogs were unavailable for comment.
No, not because there isn't a Doctor Dolittle out there who could serve as a pool reporter and get some juicy quotes. It's because, according to an article published in the American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine in 2002,
a study showed 81 percent of the dogs that finished the race had abnormal accumulations of mucus and debris that caused injury and inflammation.
In other words, they were too choked up to comment. Seavey did have plenty to say about his victory and little of it had to do with running the crap out of his dogs over a distance longer than from Hartford to Chicago. To be accurate, Seavey isn't called a dog-beater or abuser or even Master. He is called a musher, which clearly is a word to honor the mush-for-brains who continue to promote and operate this event.
The supporters of this race have the audacity to call the Iditarod a sporting event. The truth is it's closer to the scourging scene in Mel Gibson's new movie.
One more dog dropped dead the other day, bringing the total to at least 122, although there are no official numbers available for the early years. A 7-year-old male named Takk, according to Iditarod officials, died of blood loss associated with gastric ulcers. What the officials didn't say is ulcers are linked to anti-inflammatory drugs frequently used to help mask injury. Yes, the dogs are subject to random drug testing, so you know these folks are, ah, motivated enough to cheat. Takk, on Kjetil Backen's 2004 team, was no ordinary mutt. He was one of the two key lead dogs that carried Robert Sorlie to first place last year. In other words, last year's MVP is this year's maggot meal.
Backen reportedly was distraught over Takk's death, but he did manage to ask reporters to bring the dog back for him. Wouldn't it be fair if the musher were forced to bring his dead dog to the finish line with him? Or maybe it would be fairer if Snoopy was the musher and a dozen humans were latched together for a little 1,100-mile jog through all terrain, including waist-high water and Godforsaken temperatures. Hey, we would even cut them a break and let them listen to Sam Cooke singing "Chain Gang" in their earmuff-phones.
Those who would support this race are quick to belittle critics as hysterics or propagandists for PETA, etc. For the record, my wife and I are longtime multiple dog owners and we believe in hardy exercise for robust breeds. These sled dogs are bred to run. A Siberian Husky like Jonathan is a natural, but only part of the equation. All sorts of breeds and mixed breeds are used. In fact, a Siberian is often mixed with a Greyhound for optimum speed and endurance. Of course as competition grows fiercer to improve times, the faster they go, the harder they will fall.
The cruelty is in the vast distance. The cruelty is in some training techniques that would turn your stomach. This doesn't begin to address some manuals that recommend killing dogs that don't cut the mustard. They call it culling. Really, it's murder. The irony is that the Iditarod distance is so long in the first place. The race is patterned after a long-ago emergency supply route to deliver diphtheria serum.
Dogs reportedly have died from being kicked to death. A group of dogs was mangled by a snow-making machine. They've been strangulated. Electrocardiograms to monitor heart problems are now given to the dogs before the race and that's a start, but only a start.
The romantics pretend this is some extension of a Jack London novel. Hell no. This is a not-so-novel Jack The Ripper crime against man's best friend. It sullies the meaning of sport.
What remains of the 87 mushers will be crossing the finish line in the next few days, which also means the killing may not be over. In the meantime, Jonathan XII can park himself in front of the television tonight for the start of UConn's march to the Final Four. This could be a big month for him, the first time both the women and the men win national titles in the same year.
"He's a quiet dog. He hardly ever barks," said Landwehr, a 20-year-old junior majoring in animal science. "He's very mellow, which makes him good with a crowd."
Landwehr is a member of Alpha Phi Omega, a co-ed community service fraternity responsible for Jonathan. The last appearances for Jonathan, who Landwehr said is not allowed in the Civic Center, were Senior Nights at Gampel. She brings him to obedience class each week.
"He's a loveable dog, but he's actually quite lazy," Landwehr said. "He likes to lay down in the middle of games."
As death toll of dogs rises, so does Iditarod's insanity
Jon Saraceno
USA Today
March 15, 2004
I'm all for mutiny. Dog mutiny, that is.
When it comes to the Iditarod Trail Sled Dog race, how do we get more of our furry friends to lie down on the job? If they belonged to a union, there would be a strike every March when the 1,100-mile marathon of dog misery is propelled by more than 1,000 members through the treacherous Alaskan wilderness.
In that labor dispute, I would be all for the stressed-to-the-max dogs. They are overworked and underpaid. The money and the glory go to management — in this case, mushers and their sponsors.
Why does Alaska permit the "Ihurtadog?"
Easy. Commerce — shameless, bloody business carried out on the backs of man's best friends.
Sunday was the scene of more death and despair. A dog belonging to race leader Kjetil Backen of Norway suddenly sat down and died. "It is a real tragedy for him and dog mushing as a whole," race marshal Mark Nordman said at a news conference.
Imagine how the dog felt.
Last week, a 5-year-old dog named Wolf died.
Apologists contend that dogs cannot be made to run, which is true. But many of them sure can be coerced and trained. In the sledders' parlance, mutiny comes when dogs refuse to budge. It already has happened in this year's race, which has featured a fast, grueling pace during unusually warm weather.
More than an estimated 120 dogs have perished during the history of the race, which gives a Humanitarian Award. The number of dog deaths does not include animals that perished afterward — or the thousands that have been injured. Death is merely an occupational hazard — for the dogs. In 1973, the race's first year, the Iditarod took more than 20 days to complete. Two years ago, a speed record was set when Martin Buser finished the race in less than nine days.
Many dogs are dropped during the race because they are unable to continue, but many others continue to trudge on with various injuries.
A couple of years ago, a study in the American Journal of Respiratory and Critical CareMedicine reported that 81% of the 59 dogs they examined after one Iditarod had "abnormal accumulations" of mucus or cellular debris in their lower airways. In addition to fluid in the lungs, bleeding stomach ulcers occur, as does general cramping, dislocations, fractures, muscle and tendon tears, tendinitis, dehydration, hypothermia, raw paws, penile frostbite and viruses.
Not that it's easy on the mushers, either. But, hey, they choose to participate in this frozen insanity. Doug Swingley, who won the race from 1999-2001, was forced to quit from frostbitten corneas last week.
But back to the dogs. Last week, one musher needed an hour to separate three female dogs in heat from their amorous male teammates, according to the Anchorage Daily News — a newspaper no self-respecting salmon would permit itself to be wrapped in.
First, the Daily News is a sponsor. According to the Alaska Journal of Commerce, the newspaper shelled out a minimum of $50,000. The newspaper also is an investor because it reaps advertising dollars.
Invariably, photographs depict warm and fuzzy images of dogs designed to lull readers and placate critics. Imagine the horrors we don't see. Mushers and their teams are not monitored by the media — or anyone else. Likewise, many of the newspaper's syrupy stories seem almost fantasy-like in nature. According to one, four-time Iditarod champion Martin Buser discussed how dogs seem to get into "the zone," as humans report doing during endurance events.
"In the zone, one can smell the sweet scent of success," the Daily News happily wrote.
Think that's what the dogs are sniffing? I smell something else. Money.
The Daily News is not alone among mercenaries in local media. Alaska Newspapers, Alaska Public Radio and an ABC-TV affiliate that bills itself the "Official Television Station of Iditarod 2004" also are sponsors, joining Chevron, ExxonMobil, Coors Brewing and Wells Fargo.
The economic impact to Anchorage, site of the ceremonial start, is estimated at more than $5 million. Organizers increased the size of this year's purse by more than $100,000. The winner gets $69,000 plus a new Dodge pickup. It doesn't require much to buy some folks, even at the expense of living creatures who cannot defend themselves, like poor, old Wolf.
The dogs, of course, get their usual take.
More suffering.
Dear Jill,
Our 10 month old miniature poodle is piddling all over the kitchen floor when we go out. We have tried putting newspapers down for her to go on, but she won't use them. We are worried that she will start peeing on our carpeting in other rooms of the house, so we have started closing the door to the kitchen, so she stays in there while we are out.
We have to work during the day and sometimes I don't make it home for lunch. She drinks a lot of water or something and can't seem to wait until I get home. Sometimes when I do make it home to let her out, she gets so excited she pees indoors. I don't know if she means to, but it has to stop. After all, she is no longer a baby. Our friend said to take her to a class for dog obedience, and we will but is there something we should be doing meanwhile? We read your articles and think you're good. Thank you.
Marcia
Dear Marcia,
A ten month old puppy is still a "baby" dog. With proper coaching, your miniature poodle puppy can be completely housetrained and paper-trained in a short time. But first, please take your dog to the vet to rule out any medical reasons for incontinence. If your poodle passes the veterinarian's inspection, try using commercial "piddle pads" (available at pet-supply stores) instead of newspapers, for times you are not able to make it home. These pads have a manwhen necessary. How many hours a day do you leave your dog alone? Please do not leave your dog all day without walking her or allowing her to "go."
Love and paw pats,
Jillouise Breslauer
Companion Animal Behavior Consultant
What Jill Knows, Copyright 2003
Syndicated Journal Press Syndicate
e-mail: PetBehaveConsult@...
____________________________________________________________________ Â
       CONGRESS CONSIDERS STEPS TO REDUCE ROADKILL:
       Reducing roadkill is just one issue being considered in the
surface transportation reauthorization bill moving through Congress. The
Senate included provisions in its bill, S. 1072, aimed at reducing habitat
fragmentation and wildlife/ vehicle collisions— ultimately saving millions
of animals while increasing public safety. The Senate provisions would
require states to formally consider the need for wildlife crossing
structures (underpasses, culverts, or overpasses) when constructing or
improving highways -- a critical preventative step in solving the roadkill
problem. However, as the transportation bill is taken up in the House of
Representatives, these important wildlife protection provisions may be lost.
If they are, it will be another six years before we have another opportunity
to put into law these common sense provisions on behalf of wildlife and
public safety. In the meantime, millions of animals will lose their lives
trying to cross highways in search of food and mates, and the very survival
of many species -- from box turtles to grizzly bears -- will be compromised.
       WHAT YOU CAN DO:
       Please contact your U.S. Representative today. Ask him or her
to contact Transportation Committee Chairman Don Young and Ranking Democrat
James Oberstar and urge them to include in the Committee’s transportation
bill the wildlife crossing provisions approved by the Senate (Section 1501
of S. 1072). All U.S. Representatives can be reached through the U.S.
Capitol switchboard: 202-224-3121. You can look up the name of your
Representative by going online to www.Congress.org, or by calling The HSUS
at 202-955-3668.
   A Project of The Humane Society of the
United States and The Fund for Animals
Just as PETA was scheduled to testify against the Hawthorn Corporation and its president, John Cuneo, in a federal administrative court, Cuneo admitted guilt in 19 violations of the federal Animal Welfare Act. Cuneo has been ordered to relinquish custody of 16 elephants to USDA-approved facilities—including the elephant Lota, for whom we have long fought—and pay a $200,000 fine.
For more information, visit PETA.org <http://cl.extm.us/?fe8911787361037877-fe6315737c6606797016> Â and see the related article in The Washington Post (free registration required).
Per FDA:Â "In common terms, an adverse drug experience (ADE) is either an undesired side effect, or the lack of a desired effect. The Center for Veterinary Medicine (CVM) defines an ADE as 'any side effect, injury, toxicity, or sensitivity reaction (or failure to perform as expected) associated with use of an animal drug, whether or not determined to be attributable to the drug.' " (This means that you need only SUSPECT that the side effect is caused by the drug; you do not have to prove it.)
Now with that knowledge..... we have started a new website called DogsAdverseReactions.com . We are looking for stories to post, both as Memorials and Survivors. You DO NOT have to prove a drug caused a reaction, only suspect it. But be willing to follow thru with complaints to manufacturer and FDA if not already done.
If you are not sure how to file the necessary complaints..... please ask and we can help you.Â
If you might be interested ........ feel free to contact me. Or if you would like.... send your story in your words, (no profanity please) with companions picture, birthdate/year and date of passing if passed, plus your permission to post. Your email will be posted with the story, for others to request further information if they feel your story fits what they are going thru. A suggestion is to be sure to comment "In My Opinion".
We are a group of people not against any vet or manufacturer, we only want the truth known about different drugs that we have a right to be informed of, before given to our companions.
Update- Animal Sexual Abuse Arkansas Case- LETTERS NEEDED
**Alert prepared by  myREBAdog@.... When forwarding this to others, please do not alter the content of the alert, including the letter/information from PeTA that is within this alert.Â
 Â
Update: Prosecutor Terry Harris of Garland County, Arkansas, has confirmed that there is a trial set for April 1st  regarding contempt of court charges for the case involving Derek Dunaway who was arrested and charged on Sept. 17, 2002, with one count of sodomy for his admitted attacks on his dog.  In November of 2003, Animal Services of Hot Springs confirmed that a dead dog was found at the resident of Dunaway's during his probation period, which he was previously ordered not to have any animals.
Â
The sample letter below is lengthy because it contains both background information and current information re this case. Please be polite and personalize your own letter. Remind the authorities that jail time is mandatory, Dunaway was given a light sentence previously with no jail time and he broke his probation by having a dead dog in his resident during his probation.   (Hot Springs Animal Services stated they found the dead dog after neighbors complained of a dog crying at Dunaway's resident).
Â
Thank you.
Source: Lisa Marie myREBAdog@...
Â
Â
More info/media:Â http://www.pet-abuse.com/cases/601/AR/US/1
 Â
Please Contact:
Â
Honorable Terri Harris - Garland County Prosecutor
501 Ouachita Avenue
Hot Springs, AR 71901
Fax: Â (501)Â 321-2592
Main Office Phone: (501) 321-2556
Â
Â
Honorable Steve Oliver - Garland County Prosecuting Attorney
501 Ouachita Avenue
Hot Springs, AR 71901
Main Office Phone: (501) 622-3720
Email: < soliver@... >
Â
Â
Garland County Sheriff's Department
Larry Selig - Sheriff
Email: <ljs@...>
525 Ouachita Ave.
Hot Springs, Ark. 71901
Main Office Phone: (501) 622-3660 Â
Â
Dan Bugg, Supervisor
Hot Springs Animal Services
Fax: (501) 262-2091
Email: Â <dbugg@...>Â
Â
Letter sent to authorities from Peta- Information:
(the recipient's phone numbers are listed)
 Â
January 21, 2004Â
To: The Honorable Terri Harris, Garland County Prosecutor (501-321-2556)
The Honorable David White, Prosecutor, City of Hot Springs (501-623-4023)
Sheriff Larry Selig, Garland Co. Sheriff’s Office (501-622-3660)
Chief Gary Ashcraft, Hot Springs Police Dept. (501-321-6789)
Dan Bugg, Supervisor, Hot Springs Animal Services (501-262-2091)
Mary Ann Taft, Director, Garland Co. Humane Society (501-501-538-0167)
From: Martin Mersereau, Manager, Domestic Animal Issues & Abuse Dept.
Re: Derek Dunaway, convicted animal rapist
Â
Your urgent attention is requested. In October, 2002, our office was contacted by someone in reluctant e-mail contact with Hot Springs resident Derek Dunaway. During their correspondence (which harmlessly began on a “pet lovers†message board), Dunaway bragged of raping animals, and that he’d worked for, or attempted to secure employment at various local animal shelters and veterinary hospitals in order to access his victims. He also expressed his intent to advertise himself as a pet-sitting service to this end. Through extensive contact with our complainant and review of said dialogue PETA determined that our complainant’s report had merit. Local officials were contacted and, on September 17 of that year, Dunaway was charged with one count of sodomy for his admitted attacks on his dogs who—according to news reports—were found by Katherine Bolton, DVM, to be “[severely] bleeding from the colon.†He was subsequently convicted, and his sentence included a prohibition on his owning or harboring animals for one year (the second half of this prohibitive order was to run from June 6 to December 6, 2003). Â
In November, 2003, Hot Springs Animal Services officers responded to a neighbor’s report of a dog screaming from the vicinity of Dunaway’s residence. When officers arrived, they reportedly found a dog in Dunaway’s custody, dead from causes unapparent. Field Services Supervisor Dan Bugg states that a necropsy was performed and that “trauma could not be ruled out.†Dunaway appears to have violated court orders by having this animal in his charge regardless, and there is some question as to whether Dunaway was in possession of other animals at the time of this investigation.
Further, Dunaway has recently surrendered to the Garland Humane Society a female dog who was apparently in heat. A subsequent veterinary examination reportedly determined that sperm was present in the animal’s vaginal cavity. We understand that, at the request of the county prosecutor’s office, the sample in question is to be analyzed to determine its origin, animal or human, and that results are still pending. Â
We are alarmed to learn that Dunaway allegedly and currently has in his charge two red Doberman pinschers, a black Labrador and a cat—at least two of these animals were given him by his father who was present during the 2002 court proceedings (Dunaway was reportedly found in possession of two Doberman pinschers at the time of his 2002 arrest, as well).On January 15, we requested that humane officials visit Dunaway’s animals with an eye for trauma consistent with non-canine penetration. However we are unable to determine if Dunaway’s dogs have in fact been examined by any law-enforcement official, last week, or ever, and would appreciate some clarification regarding such efforts if they were made at all. Repeat crimes among animal abusers—particularly so-called “zoophilesâ€â€”are the rule. Given this and recent events, we urge your respective offices to do whatever is necessary to ensure the welfare of all animals currently in Dunaway’s charge, to hold him accountable for any injuries sustained by same, and to expedite whatever processes are in motion to hold the suspect accountable for sentencing violations. May we suggest that the animals in question be taken into protective custody, or, if a field examination can determine the existence of swelling, tearing, bleeding or any other form of trauma, that they be seized as evidence? Surely you agree that their safety should be of utmost concern, and that any and all avenues available to secure their safety be vigorously explored? Â
Please allow us to hear from you soon regarding this matter. If there is another entity to whom we should appeal for proactive assistance in this matter, please advise.Â
Â
________________________________
To subscribe send email to: Ljbeane1@...
Animals In Print provides a free newsletter for responsible animal rights advocacy. There is no expressed or implied endorsement by Animals In Print staff of articles
**COPYRIGHT NOTICE** In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. Section 107, any
copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use without profit
or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for nonprofit research and educational purposes only. http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html
To thank Padecky: padecky@...
Letters to the editor: letters@...
Victims of cold, fatigue and greed
By Bod Padecky
Santa Rosa Press Democrat
March 20, 2004
A dog is there for the taking. He can't talk back. He can't say, stop, you're killing me, you're treating me like a dog. Six years ago, Margery Glickman happened upon a couple of hundred dogs that, if they could have spoken, would have said just that.
Glickman was vacationing in Alaska. She came for the scenery but saw instead a "dog farm." Animals were tethered to stakes by chains, belligerent in their confinement, drinking filthy water, sitting, as she said, "in their own fecal matter." This was a breeding place for the Iditarod. Glickman was perplexed.
Even back home in Miami, Glickman had heard of the Iditarod. It was a 1,149-mile dog sled race in the middle of winter across Alaska. Designed to commemorate the diphtheria run that saved lives in 1925, the Iditarod had become romantic legend, courageous mushers crossing forests, rivers, tundra and mountain ranges with enthusiastic canines. What glory! Ah, but where was the glory in this?
"I was appalled," she said.
Glickman had never been an activist in her life. She was a first-grade teacher. She was a mom. She was in Alaska to relax. Problem was, she couldn't.
"Of 300 dogs on a dog farm," Glickman said, "five might be judged good enough to run in the Iditarod. The rest? Most of them would be culled."
They would be killed, by clubs, by gunshot, by being dragged to death in harness. Some were skinned for parkas and mittens. Her indignation grew in direct proportion to her curiosity. Glickman found dogs working on exercise wheels, like hamsters. She found dogs with muscle tears, raw paws, hypothermia, dislocated joints, penile frostbite, fluid in legs and lungs.
The 32nd running of the Iditarod concludes this weekend, and though records weren't kept for the first 10 years of the race, Glickman now has counted 122 dogs who have died during the last 22 years. She was not alone in her disgust.
"With a buildup of lactic acid and other chemicals from muscle degradation as a result of extreme exercise," said Dr. Paula Kislak, President of the Association of Veterinarians for Animal Rights, "toxicity in the liver and kidneys may not cause death for days or weeks after a race."
So the 122 confirmed deaths?
"Adding the dogs who were culled, died in training and died after the race from complications," Dr. Kislak said, "the number is in the thousands. That is obscene. The race only is run for entertainment and to make money."
Greed is not confined to professional baseball players. The economic impact to Anchorage alone is estimated at $5 million. The Iditarod is a money-maker. Glickman, 56, has launched Sled Dog Action Coalition, a nonprofit volunteer-only organization. She has been so successful, sponsors like Pizza Hut, Pfizer and Costco have dropped out. She has received death threats, enough of them so that she doesn't go to Alaska.
"It is unconscionable," Glickman said. "They (mushers) say they love their dogs, but they don't love their dogs. It is an act of barbarism. It is a shameless, bloody business."
In the Iditarod, dogs are a car tire that goes flat. Just get another one. Except a car tire was never named Lassie or Ol' Yeller. A car tire never welcomed you home at night. A car tire never took the edge off feeling lonely. A car tire never played with the kids, and a kid never cried when the car tire died.
If a dog is man's best friend, this is not how you treat your best friend. You don't push him so hard he can't even exhale to vomit but instead chokes on it while falling down.
And as he watches his dog writhe on the ground, what can the musher possibly say that would even remotely make this sight worthwhile?
(1) Article by Jacobs, Hartford Courant. Please thank him: jjacobs@....
Letter to the editor: letters@...
(2) Article by Saraceno, USA Today. Please thank him: jons@...
Letter to the editor: editor@...
(1) What Iditarod Does To Dogs Is True March Madness
by Jeff Jacobs
Hartford Courant
March 18, 2004
Jonathan XII, a 3-year-old white Siberian Husky who loves to be petted, lives a comfortable lifestyle at an unidentified location 20 minutes from the UConn campus. The shroud of secrecy is necessary, his handler Karen Landwehr said, to prevent merry pranksters from Rhode Island and other rival schools from kidnapping the mascot of our state university.
Personally, I'm not buying the explanation.
I'm convinced Jonathan, the noble heir to a tradition that dates to 1934, is being hidden so he is not drafted into the annual war against dogs. Surely you've heard of the 1,100-mile death march from Anchorage to Nome. It's the grotesque spectacle that alternately bills itself as Alaska's great race and the world's premier dog-sled race.
USA Today columnist Jon Saraceno once called it the "Ihurtadog."
Sportscaster Jim Rome upped the ante to "I-killed-a-dog sled race."
Nothing trumps death, so just paint me thrilled that the 32nd Iditarod finally, mercifully will end this week.
Early Wednesday morning, Mitch Seavey, 44, won the first prize of $69,000 and a new Dodge pickup truck - hey, a man needs space to cart away his carcasses - by crossing the finish line behind his eight canine slaves in a time of nine days, 12 hours, 20 minutes and 22 seconds.
His dogs were unavailable for comment.
No, not because there isn't a Doctor Dolittle out there who could serve as a pool reporter and get some juicy quotes. It's because, according to an article published in the American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine in 2002, a study showed 81 percent of the dogs that finished the race had abnormal accumulations of mucus and debris that caused injury and inflammation.
In other words, they were too choked up to comment. Seavey did have plenty to say about his victory and little of it had to do with running the crap out of his dogs over a distance longer than from Hartford to Chicago. To be accurate, Seavey isn't called a dog-beater or abuser or even Master. He is called a musher, which clearly is a word to honor the mush-for-brains who continue to promote and operate this event.
The supporters of this race have the audacity to call the Iditarod a sporting event. The truth is it's closer to the scourging scene in Mel Gibson's new movie.
One more dog dropped dead the other day, bringing the total to at least 122, although there are no official numbers available for the early years. A 7-year-old male named Takk, according to Iditarod officials, died of blood loss associated with gastric ulcers. What the officials didn't say is ulcers are linked to anti-inflammatory drugs frequently used to help mask injury. Yes, the dogs are subject to random drug testing, so you know these folks are, ah, motivated enough to cheat. Takk, on Kjetil Backen's 2004 team, was no ordinary mutt. He was one of the two key lead dogs that carried Robert Sorlie to first place last year. In other words, last year's MVP is this year's maggot meal.
Backen reportedly was distraught over Takk's death, but he did manage to ask reporters to bring the dog back for him. Wouldn't it be fair if the musher were forced to bring his dead dog to the finish line with him? Or maybe it would be fairer if Snoopy was the musher and a dozen humans were latched together for a little 1,100-mile jog through all terrain, including waist-high water and Godforsaken temperatures. Hey, we would even cut them a break and let them listen to Sam Cooke singing "Chain Gang" in their earmuff-phones.
Those who would support this race are quick to belittle critics as hysterics or propagandists for PETA, etc. For the record, my wife and I are longtime multiple dog owners and we believe in hardy exercise for robust breeds. These sled dogs are bred to run. A Siberian Husky like Jonathan is a natural, but only part of the equation. All sorts of breeds and mixed breeds are used. In fact, a Siberian is often mixed with a Greyhound for optimum speed and endurance. Of course as competition grows fiercer to improve times, the faster they go, the harder they will fall.
The cruelty is in the vast distance. The cruelty is in some training techniques that would turn your stomach. This doesn't begin to address some manuals that recommend killing dogs that don't cut the mustard. They call it culling. Really, it's murder. The irony is that the Iditarod distance is so long in the first place. The race is patterned after a long-ago emergency supply route to deliver diphtheria serum.
Dogs reportedly have died from being kicked to death. A group of dogs was mangled by a snow-making machine. They've been strangulated. Electrocardiograms to monitor heart problems are now given to the dogs before the race and that's a start, but only a start.
The romantics pretend this is some extension of a Jack London novel. Hell no. This is a not-so-novel Jack The Ripper crime against man's best friend. It sullies the meaning of sport.
What remains of the 87 mushers will be crossing the finish line in the next few days, which also means the killing may not be over. In the meantime, Jonathan XII can park himself in front of the television tonight for the start of UConn's march to the Final Four. This could be a big month for him, the first time both the women and the men win national titles in the same year.
"He's a quiet dog. He hardly ever barks," said Landwehr, a 20-year-old junior majoring in animal science. "He's very mellow, which makes him good with a crowd."
Landwehr is a member of Alpha Phi Omega, a co-ed community service fraternity responsible for Jonathan. The last appearances for Jonathan, who Landwehr said is not allowed in the Civic Center, were Senior Nights at Gampel. She brings him to obedience class each week.
"He's a loveable dog, but he's actually quite lazy," Landwehr said. "He likes to lay down in the middle of games."
(2) As death toll of dogs rises, so does Iditarod's insanity
Jon Saraceno
USA Today
March 15, 2004
I'm all for mutiny. Dog mutiny, that is.
When it comes to the Iditarod Trail Sled Dog race, how do we get more of our furry friends to lie down on the job? If they belonged to a union, there would be a strike every March when the 1,100-mile marathon of dog misery is propelled by more than 1,000 members through the treacherous Alaskan wilderness.
In that labor dispute, I would be all for the stressed-to-the-max dogs. They are overworked and underpaid. The money and the glory go to management — in this case, mushers and their sponsors.
Why does Alaska permit the "Ihurtadog?"
Easy. Commerce — shameless, bloody business carried out on the backs of man's best friends.
Sunday was the scene of more death and despair. A dog belonging to race leader Kjetil Backen of Norway suddenly sat down and died. "It is a real tragedy for him and dog mushing as a whole," race marshal Mark Nordman said at a news conference.
Imagine how the dog felt.
Last week, a 5-year-old dog named Wolf died.
Apologists contend that dogs cannot be made to run, which is true. But many of them sure can be coerced and trained. In the sledders' parlance, mutiny comes when dogs refuse to budge. It already has happened in this year's race, which has featured a fast, grueling pace during unusually warm weather.
More than an estimated 120 dogs have perished during the history of the race, which gives a Humanitarian Award. The number of dog deaths does not include animals that perished afterward — or the thousands that have been injured. Death is merely an occupational hazard — for the dogs. In 1973, the race's first year, the Iditarod took more than 20 days to complete. Two years ago, a speed record was set when Martin Buser finished the race in less than nine days.
Many dogs are dropped during the race because they are unable to continue, but many others continue to trudge on with various injuries.
A couple of years ago, a study in the American Journal of Respiratory and Critical CareMedicine reported that 81% of the 59 dogs they examined after one Iditarod had "abnormal accumulations" of mucus or cellular debris in their lower airways. In addition to fluid in the lungs, bleeding stomach ulcers occur, as does general cramping, dislocations, fractures, muscle and tendon tears, tendinitis, dehydration, hypothermia, raw paws, penile frostbite and viruses.
Not that it's easy on the mushers, either. But, hey, they choose to participate in this frozen insanity. Doug Swingley, who won the race from 1999-2001, was forced to quit from frostbitten corneas last week.
But back to the dogs. Last week, one musher needed an hour to separate three female dogs in heat from their amorous male teammates, according to the Anchorage Daily News — a newspaper no self-respecting salmon would permit itself to be wrapped in.
First, the Daily News is a sponsor. According to the Alaska Journal of Commerce, the newspaper shelled out a minimum of $50,000. The newspaper also is an investor because it reaps advertising dollars.
Invariably, photographs depict warm and fuzzy images of dogs designed to lull readers and placate critics. Imagine the horrors we don't see. Mushers and their teams are not monitored by the media — or anyone else. Likewise, many of the newspaper's syrupy stories seem almost fantasy-like in nature. According to one, four-time Iditarod champion Martin Buser discussed how dogs seem to get into "the zone," as humans report doing during endurance events.
"In the zone, one can smell the sweet scent of success," the Daily News happily wrote.
Think that's what the dogs are sniffing? I smell something else. Money.
The Daily News is not alone among mercenaries in local media. Alaska Newspapers, Alaska Public Radio and an ABC-TV affiliate that bills itself the "Official Television Station of Iditarod 2004" also are sponsors, joining Chevron, ExxonMobil, Coors Brewing and Wells Fargo.
The economic impact to Anchorage, site of the ceremonial start, is estimated at more than $5 million. Organizers increased the size of this year's purse by more than $100,000. The winner gets $69,000 plus a new Dodge pickup. It doesn't require much to buy some folks, even at the expense of living creatures who cannot defend themselves, like poor, old Wolf.
The dogs, of course, get their usual take.
More suffering.
***
E-mail Jon Saraceno at jons@... Email editor: editor@...
Animals in Print
<A HREF="http://www.all-creatures.org/aip/">http://www.all-creatures.org/aip/
</A>
(To subscribe email: Ljbeane1@...)
Alert published on November 11, 2003:
From the Sled Dog Action Coalition
Merritt Clifton, the editor of Animal People is pro-Iditarod and pro-Yukon
Quest. For facts about Iditarod race cruelties visit: <A
HREF="http://www.helpsleddogs.org/">http://www.helpsleddogs.org</A> .
From ANIMAL PEOPLE, September 2000--
What if animal rights theory went to the dogs?
Beyond Animal Rights:
A Feminist Caring Ethic for the Treatment of Animals
Edited by Josephine Donovan
and Carol J. Adams
Continuum Publishing Co. (370 Lexington Ave., New York, NY 10017), 1996.
26 pages, paperback. $18.95.
Yukon Alone:
The World's Toughest Adventure Race
by John Balzar
Henry Holt & Co.
(115 W. 18th St., New York, NY 10011), 1999. 304 pages,
hardcover, $25.00.
Many of the authors included in Beyond Animal Rights might
doubt there is any resemblance between their outlook toward animals
and that of the participants in the Yukon Quest, the annual
1,023-mile dog sled race between Whitehorse and Fairbanks.
The Yukon Quest is held in colder weather, during a darker
month, intersecting less often with civilization, than the better
known 1,150-mile Iditarod. It may be less difficult to win only
because the prize money and media notice are less, attracting fewer
of the top professional teams.
The Beyond Animal Rights authors are mostly vegetarians,
academics, and often tediously intellectual. Some seem to do little
but quote others, with endless footnotes. Philosophy professor and
horse enthusiast Rita Manning appears to be the only one to spend
much time outdoors.
The Yukon Quest participants by contrast fish, hunt, and
many trap. Some may be barely literate. More than just a few,
including the women, are drawn by the macho image of the Quest,
which has never been won by a woman.
Some Yukon Quest fans, though not the mushers, even sneer
at the Iditarod as a "sissy race," because from 1986 into the
mid-1990s it was dominated by four-time winner Susan Butcher,
one-time winner Libby Riddle, and Dee Dee Jonrowe, who had nine
top-10 finishes in 15 tries.
The women Iditarod contenders helped to introduce a new ethic
of gentler dog care and greater accountability--sometimes at their
own expense. Butcher, a vet tech, lost her chance at a record
fifth victory when she waited out a storm rather than put her dogs at
risk. Streaking past to win was Rick Swenson, who did not lose a
dog until his 20th Iditarod, and has not lost any dogs since.
Losses of 20 to 30 dogs per Iditarod were the norm in the
1970s, when the race was young, the field was far smaller, and
even winning teams spent twice as long on the trail. These days the
Iditarod and the Yukon Quest each lose under 1% of the 300-500 dogs
who start each event.
Yet despite the dramatic drop in dog losses--which result in
part from increased speed, reducing exposure to the elements--most
and probably all of the Beyond Animal Rights authors would agree with
the prevailing animal rights view that mushing is inherently
exploitive, abusive, and unacceptable.
Yukon Alone author John Balzar, on the other hand, is
persuaded by experience that the Yukon Quest and the Iditarod are not
cruel. As a "fellow traveler," in both animal rights and mushing
circles, Balzar discusses animal rights with most of the central
figures in his first-hand account of the 1998 Yukon Quest, and finds
many of them are at least sympathetic to the point of adopting quirky
behavioral inconsistencies.
Yukon Quest cofounder Joe May, for example, was a trapper
who had misgivings about the cruelty of his trade. He gave up
trapping any species but marten, known for preying upon other
species caught in traps, whose pelts fetch a relatively high price.
"Then he was invited to a local sled dog race, and his trapline
dogs--surprise--won," Balzar recounts. "May thought, 'I can make a
living this way and don't have to kill anything.'"
Competitor Jimmy Hendrick outspokenly opposes wolf-snaring.
"I just don't think one living being should do that to another,"
Hendrick says.
"So now the rednecks are after him," recounts Balzar. A
neighbor is suspected of deliberately snaring the Hendrick family pet.
Trapper Wayne Hall, contrary to local norms, brings his dog
indoors to sleep at his feet. Hall too compromises with his
conscience by trapping only marten.
"He will not trap foxes or wolves," Balzar writes. "He
cannot bear the idea. He can barely stand trapping at all. If he
could gather and sell mushrooms from under the snowpack, I believe
he would gladly trade his traps for a shovel."
Another trapper Balzar meets feeds and values ravens as his
only friends.
"Dog mushing may not be cruel," Balzar offers, "but how
about trapping animals for fur? Answer: it's cruel. But so is
industrial livestock production. I have drawn my own lines. I eat
meat, although less than I used to. I would never wear fur for
decoration. But I have a ruff of raccoon fur on my parka...I wear a
hat of beaver fur because it's warm, and the woman who sold it to me
feeds her family off the trapline.
"My own moral position is entirely indefensible, of course.
Like millions of others, I hire my killers and don't watch. That
puts me on a lower plane, I'm afraid," than the trappers he
interviews. "And [puts Balzar] many rungs down from my friends at
the humane society, with their vegan diets and canvas shoes. Odd,
isn't it: these two kinds of people have more in common, and are
less willing to recognize it, than they do with the remainder of us
in the squishy middle. The trapper and the vegan both live in
constant awareness of animals and their suffering."
What this has to do with AR
Like Balzar, I see no cruelty inherent in dog sledding and
sled racing. I have never done either, but I have run thousands of
miles cross-country in Quebec winters, challenging blizzards in
mountain footraces of up to 50 miles in length. I have also run with
a half-husky who never tired of running, even under the worst
conditions. Those who have never been athletes may never understand
what drives either human or canine to charge against a
40-mile-an-hour headwind in a whiteout in the middle of nowhere at 30
degrees below zero, but those who have done it would not trade the
experience.
Unlike Balzar, I am a lifelong vegetarian. From having also
found and removed countless illegal traplines on my crosscountry
training runs, 1977-1989, I have as much direct experience of
trapping as most trappers, and seriously doubt from it that most
trappers--who travel by car and snow machine--give animal suffering
any thought at all.
But dog sledders are different, because they have to be. A
team of 16 huskies is a formidable pack, easily capable of eating a
musher who fails to command their respect. As all the dogs must be
unhooked and fed every two to four hours during a race in order to
keep their strength up, they get plenty of opportunity. Whether or
not a musher is capable of empathizing with any other being, he or
she must understand and bond with the team.
Beyond Animal Rights explores the inherent contradiction
between recognizing the rights of animals and making impositions upon
animals which may include sterilizing them and keeping them confined,
or asking them to push on past the normal limits of athletic
endurance.
The Beyond Animal Rights authors make no reference to
mushing. Instead, they discuss abstractly their belief that "the
discourse of rights and interests" led since the 1970s by male
philosophers Peter Singer and Tom Regan has failed to appropriately
address the practical issues involved in what In A Different Voice
author Carol Gilligan in 1982 called women's "conception of
morality...concerned with the activity of care, responsibility, and
relationships."
Beyond Animal Rights editor Josephine Donovan finds
especially off-the-point Regan's several essays asserting that the
case for animal rights is a matter of application of reason alone,
exclusive of emotional considerations.
Concludes the Beyond Animal Rights introduction, "In a
recent article, legal scholar Robin West pointed out that 'a
community and judiciary that relies on nurturant, caring, loving,
empathic values rather than exclusively on the rule of reason will
not melt into a murky quagmire, or sharpen into the dreaded specter
of totalitarianism."
That can be debated. Yet endless discussions of whether to
save a human or a dog (who is probably the best swimmer in the
scenario) if a boat sinks go nowhere, because they depend upon
extending logic to extreme situations, and have little to do with
daily life.
Declares Brian Luke, "Animal exploitation thrives not
because people fail to care [about animals] but because they do
care," either deliberately deadening their response to animal
suffering so as to go on eating meat, hunting, trapping, or
whatever, or inappropriately responding through self-identification
with the animal: for instance, by allowing pets to go unaltered and
roam at large; or by abandoning an animal they cannot keep to "give
the animal a chance," instead of delivering the animal to a shelter
and possible death.
"An ethic of care would be silent about the abstract right to
life, whether positive or negative, though it could shed light on
particular cases," declares Rita Manning.
What Manning means is that euthanasia, for instance, should
be considered in terms of quality of life, not just the right to
life--and that is exactly how most people involved in sheltering, on
either the conventional or no-kill side of the fence, have come to
think about it. The no-kill movement took off in the early 1990s not
because of animal rights theorizing, done mostly by men, but rather
because women got tired of listening to men talk and set out to
encourage hands-on work that would actually prevent here-and-now
animal suffering.
For every male no-kill pioneer like Richard Avanzino, who
led San Francisco to no-kill, there were and are five women like
ANIMAL PEOPLE publisher Kim Bartlett, Alley Cat Allies founders
Louise Holton and Becky Robinson, Spay/USA founder Esther Mechler,
and Doing Things For Animals founder Lynda Foro; and behind them all
were the historical examples of North Shore Animal League founder
Elisabeth Lewyt, who borrowed her late husband's business acumen to
introduce high-volume adoption, and their late friend Alice
Herrington, who as founder of Friends of Animals made the first
effort to popularize sterilization surgery.
"If the animal welfare movement was mine to lead," opines
Balzar, placing similar emphasis on the here-and-now over theory,
"I would not turn my back on mushers--I'd enlist them as allies. As
a group, they live closer to dogs and depend more profoundly on dogs
than any pet owners I know. I would continue to keep a wary eye on
competitive mushing to prevent any backsliding, and I'd denounce
those who would train dogs by fear, or those who would cull puppies
looking for only the strongest. And, again, I'd enlist mushers as
allies."
If mushers could be persuaded to carry the message about pet
overpopulation to Alaska, more dog-killing could be prevented in a
typical week than the sum of all the casualties in all 43 runnings of
the Iditarod and Yukon Quest.
What if a humane organization sponsored a top musher with a
neutered team of ex-shelter dogs in the Iditarod or Yukon Quest?
Some former strays have already distinguished themselves in both
races; such a team could even become a contender. Contending or
not, however, it would spread the word in the north farther and
faster than anything else ever has.
When the opportunity exists to make allies, especially among
prominent role models within the hunting, fishing, and trapping
culture of the Far North, why allow abstractions based on "rights"
theory to interfere with what can be done to benefit dogs by building
on the commonality of caring?
In time, cultivating broader concern for dogs in the Far
North should lead to openings for advancing concern for other
species--just as occurred in the Lower 48 and elsewhere, as the
humane movement grew from the early focus on human orphans, horses,
and dogs to the present broad concern about all cruelty. Here,
meanwhile, is an opportunity to start; and if we learn from past
experience, expanding the cause in the Far North should not take
nearly so long. --M.C.
--
Merritt Clifton
Editor, ANIMAL PEOPLE
P.O. Box 960
Clinton, WA 98236
E-mail: anmlpepl@...
PLEASE CROSSPOST
From the Sled Dog Action Coalition, <A HREF="http://www.helpsleddogs.org/">
http://www.helpsleddogs.org</A>
As you can read in the article copied below, Merritt Clifton, the editor of
Animal People is pro-Iditarod and pro-Yukon Quest. For facts about Iditarod
race cruelties visit: <A HREF="http://www.helpsleddogs.org/">
http://www.helpsleddogs.org</A> .
Subj: Yukon Quest
Date: 11/8/03 12:12:47 AM Eastern Standard Time
From: <A HREF="mailto:anmlpepl@...">anmlpepl@...</A> [Merritt
Clifton's email address]
To: <A HREF="mailto:SledDogAC@...">SledDogAC@...</A> [Sled Dog Action
Coaliton's email address]
CC: [deleted]
Sent from the Internet (Details)
From ANIMAL PEOPLE, September 2000--
What if animal rights theory went to the dogs?
Beyond Animal Rights:
A Feminist Caring Ethic for the Treatment of Animals
Edited by Josephine Donovan
and Carol J. Adams
Continuum Publishing Co. (370 Lexington Ave., New York, NY 10017), 1996.
26 pages, paperback. $18.95.
Yukon Alone:
The World's Toughest Adventure Race
by John Balzar
Henry Holt & Co.
(115 W. 18th St., New York, NY 10011), 1999. 304 pages,
hardcover, $25.00.
Many of the authors included in Beyond Animal Rights might
doubt there is any resemblance between their outlook toward animals
and that of the participants in the Yukon Quest, the annual
1,023-mile dog sled race between Whitehorse and Fairbanks.
The Yukon Quest is held in colder weather, during a darker
month, intersecting less often with civilization, than the better
known 1,150-mile Iditarod. It may be less difficult to win only
because the prize money and media notice are less, attracting fewer
of the top professional teams.
The Beyond Animal Rights authors are mostly vegetarians,
academics, and often tediously intellectual. Some seem to do little
but quote others, with endless footnotes. Philosophy professor and
horse enthusiast Rita Manning appears to be the only one to spend
much time outdoors.
The Yukon Quest participants by contrast fish, hunt, and
many trap. Some may be barely literate. More than just a few,
including the women, are drawn by the macho image of the Quest,
which has never been won by a woman.
Some Yukon Quest fans, though not the mushers, even sneer
at the Iditarod as a "sissy race," because from 1986 into the
mid-1990s it was dominated by four-time winner Susan Butcher,
one-time winner Libby Riddle, and Dee Dee Jonrowe, who had nine
top-10 finishes in 15 tries.
The women Iditarod contenders helped to introduce a new ethic
of gentler dog care and greater accountability--sometimes at their
own expense. Butcher, a vet tech, lost her chance at a record
fifth victory when she waited out a storm rather than put her dogs at
risk. Streaking past to win was Rick Swenson, who did not lose a
dog until his 20th Iditarod, and has not lost any dogs since.
Losses of 20 to 30 dogs per Iditarod were the norm in the
1970s, when the race was young, the field was far smaller, and
even winning teams spent twice as long on the trail. These days the
Iditarod and the Yukon Quest each lose under 1% of the 300-500 dogs
who start each event.
Yet despite the dramatic drop in dog losses--which result in
part from increased speed, reducing exposure to the elements--most
and probably all of the Beyond Animal Rights authors would agree with
the prevailing animal rights view that mushing is inherently
exploitive, abusive, and unacceptable.
Yukon Alone author John Balzar, on the other hand, is
persuaded by experience that the Yukon Quest and the Iditarod are not
cruel. As a "fellow traveler," in both animal rights and mushing
circles, Balzar discusses animal rights with most of the central
figures in his first-hand account of the 1998 Yukon Quest, and finds
many of them are at least sympathetic to the point of adopting quirky
behavioral inconsistencies.
Yukon Quest cofounder Joe May, for example, was a trapper
who had misgivings about the cruelty of his trade. He gave up
trapping any species but marten, known for preying upon other
species caught in traps, whose pelts fetch a relatively high price.
"Then he was invited to a local sled dog race, and his trapline
dogs--surprise--won," Balzar recounts. "May thought, 'I can make a
living this way and don't have to kill anything.'"
Competitor Jimmy Hendrick outspokenly opposes wolf-snaring.
"I just don't think one living being should do that to another,"
Hendrick says.
"So now the rednecks are after him," recounts Balzar. A
neighbor is suspected of deliberately snaring the Hendrick family pet.
Trapper Wayne Hall, contrary to local norms, brings his dog
indoors to sleep at his feet. Hall too compromises with his
conscience by trapping only marten.
"He will not trap foxes or wolves," Balzar writes. "He
cannot bear the idea. He can barely stand trapping at all. If he
could gather and sell mushrooms from under the snowpack, I believe
he would gladly trade his traps for a shovel."
Another trapper Balzar meets feeds and values ravens as his
only friends.
"Dog mushing may not be cruel," Balzar offers, "but how
about trapping animals for fur? Answer: it's cruel. But so is
industrial livestock production. I have drawn my own lines. I eat
meat, although less than I used to. I would never wear fur for
decoration. But I have a ruff of raccoon fur on my parka...I wear a
hat of beaver fur because it's warm, and the woman who sold it to me
feeds her family off the trapline.
"My own moral position is entirely indefensible, of course.
Like millions of others, I hire my killers and don't watch. That
puts me on a lower plane, I'm afraid," than the trappers he
interviews. "And [puts Balzar] many rungs down from my friends at
the humane society, with their vegan diets and canvas shoes. Odd,
isn't it: these two kinds of people have more in common, and are
less willing to recognize it, than they do with the remainder of us
in the squishy middle. The trapper and the vegan both live in
constant awareness of animals and their suffering."
What this has to do with AR
Like Balzar, I see no cruelty inherent in dog sledding and
sled racing. I have never done either, but I have run thousands of
miles cross-country in Quebec winters, challenging blizzards in
mountain footraces of up to 50 miles in length. I have also run with
a half-husky who never tired of running, even under the worst
conditions. Those who have never been athletes may never understand
what drives either human or canine to charge against a
40-mile-an-hour headwind in a whiteout in the middle of nowhere at 30
degrees below zero, but those who have done it would not trade the
experience.
Unlike Balzar, I am a lifelong vegetarian. From having also
found and removed countless illegal traplines on my crosscountry
training runs, 1977-1989, I have as much direct experience of
trapping as most trappers, and seriously doubt from it that most
trappers--who travel by car and snow machine--give animal suffering
any thought at all.
But dog sledders are different, because they have to be. A
team of 16 huskies is a formidable pack, easily capable of eating a
musher who fails to command their respect. As all the dogs must be
unhooked and fed every two to four hours during a race in order to
keep their strength up, they get plenty of opportunity. Whether or
not a musher is capable of empathizing with any other being, he or
she must understand and bond with the team.
Beyond Animal Rights explores the inherent contradiction
between recognizing the rights of animals and making impositions upon
animals which may include sterilizing them and keeping them confined,
or asking them to push on past the normal limits of athletic
endurance.
The Beyond Animal Rights authors make no reference to
mushing. Instead, they discuss abstractly their belief that "the
discourse of rights and interests" led since the 1970s by male
philosophers Peter Singer and Tom Regan has failed to appropriately
address the practical issues involved in what In A Different Voice
author Carol Gilligan in 1982 called women's "conception of
morality...concerned with the activity of care, responsibility, and
relationships."
Beyond Animal Rights editor Josephine Donovan finds
especially off-the-point Regan's several essays asserting that the
case for animal rights is a matter of application of reason alone,
exclusive of emotional considerations.
Concludes the Beyond Animal Rights introduction, "In a
recent article, legal scholar Robin West pointed out that 'a
community and judiciary that relies on nurturant, caring, loving,
empathic values rather than exclusively on the rule of reason will
not melt into a murky quagmire, or sharpen into the dreaded specter
of totalitarianism."
That can be debated. Yet endless discussions of whether to
save a human or a dog (who is probably the best swimmer in the
scenario) if a boat sinks go nowhere, because they depend upon
extending logic to extreme situations, and have little to do with
daily life.
Declares Brian Luke, "Animal exploitation thrives not
because people fail to care [about animals] but because they do
care," either deliberately deadening their response to animal
suffering so as to go on eating meat, hunting, trapping, or
whatever, or inappropriately responding through self-identification
with the animal: for instance, by allowing pets to go unaltered and
roam at large; or by abandoning an animal they cannot keep to "give
the animal a chance," instead of delivering the animal to a shelter
and possible death.
"An ethic of care would be silent about the abstract right to
life, whether positive or negative, though it could shed light on
particular cases," declares Rita Manning.
What Manning means is that euthanasia, for instance, should
be considered in terms of quality of life, not just the right to
life--and that is exactly how most people involved in sheltering, on
either the conventional or no-kill side of the fence, have come to
think about it. The no-kill movement took off in the early 1990s not
because of animal rights theorizing, done mostly by men, but rather
because women got tired of listening to men talk and set out to
encourage hands-on work that would actually prevent here-and-now
animal suffering.
For every male no-kill pioneer like Richard Avanzino, who
led San Francisco to no-kill, there were and are five women like
ANIMAL PEOPLE publisher Kim Bartlett, Alley Cat Allies founders
Louise Holton and Becky Robinson, Spay/USA founder Esther Mechler,
and Doing Things For Animals founder Lynda Foro; and behind them all
were the historical examples of North Shore Animal League founder
Elisabeth Lewyt, who borrowed her late husband's business acumen to
introduce high-volume adoption, and their late friend Alice
Herrington, who as founder of Friends of Animals made the first
effort to popularize sterilization surgery.
"If the animal welfare movement was mine to lead," opines
Balzar, placing similar emphasis on the here-and-now over theory,
"I would not turn my back on mushers--I'd enlist them as allies. As
a group, they live closer to dogs and depend more profoundly on dogs
than any pet owners I know. I would continue to keep a wary eye on
competitive mushing to prevent any backsliding, and I'd denounce
those who would train dogs by fear, or those who would cull puppies
looking for only the strongest. And, again, I'd enlist mushers as
allies."
If mushers could be persuaded to carry the message about pet
overpopulation to Alaska, more dog-killing could be prevented in a
typical week than the sum of all the casualties in all 43 runnings of
the Iditarod and Yukon Quest.
What if a humane organization sponsored a top musher with a neutered
team of ex-shelter dogs in the Iditarod or Yukon Quest? Some former strays
have already distinguished themselves in both races; such a team could even
become a contender. Contending or not, however, it would spread the word in
the north farther and faster than anything else ever has. When the
opportunity exists to make allies, especially among prominent role models
within the hunting, fishing, and trapping culture of the Far North, why
allow abstractions based on "rights" theory to interfere with what can be done
to
benefit dogs by building on the commonality of caring? In time,
cultivating broader concern for dogs in the Far North should lead to openings
for advancing concern for other species--just as occurred in the Lower 48 and
elsewhere, as the humane movement grew from the early focus on human
orphans, horses, and dogs to the present broad concern about all cruelty.
Here,
meanwhile, is an opportunity to start; and if we learn from past
experience, expanding the cause in the Far North should not take nearly so
long.
--M.C.
-- Merritt Clifton Editor, ANIMAL PEOPLE P.O. Box 960 Clinton, WA 98236
Telephone: 360-579-2505 Fax: 360-579-2575 E-mail: anmlpepl@...
Web: www.animalpeoplenews.org [ANIMAL PEOPLE is the leading independent
newspaper providing original investigative coverage of animal protection
worldwide,
founded in 1992. Our readership of 30,000-plus includes the
decision-makers at more than 9,000 animal protection organizations. We have no
alignment or
affiliation with any other entity.]
PLEASE CROSSPOST
From the Sled Dog Action Coalition, <A HREF="http://www.helpsleddogs.org">
http://www.helpsleddogs.org</A> :
CBS Early Show's interview of blind musher Rachael Scdoris ignored the plight
of the Iditarod dogs, and failed to give equal time to the animal protection
side of the Iditarod story.
CBS asked Scdoris for her opinion of the animal protection viewpoint. Nothing
was said about the many ways in which the Iditarod is cruel. This was not a
fair or objective presentation of our views or of the facts. Please ask CBS
Early Show to air facts about Iditarod cruelties on another show.
EMAILS with commas: earlyshow@..., StormH@...,
SmithH@..., jchen@..., rsyler@...
EMAILS with semi-colons: earlyshow@...; StormH@...;
SmithH@...; jchen@...; rsyler@...
SAMPLE LETTER TO PERSONALIZE:
Dear Ms. Chen, Mr. Smith, Ms. Storm and Ms. Syler:
Animal protection advocates requested that your interview of blind musher
Rachael Scdoris be balanced by giving equal time to the animal protection side
of
the Iditarod story.
Instead, you asked Scdoris for her opinion of the animal protection
viewpoint, without stating any of the many ways in which the Iditarod is cruel.
CBS did
not give a fair or objective presentation of the animal protection
perspective or of the facts.
On another show, please devote equal air time to facts about Iditarod
cruelties and to the animal protection viewpoint.
In the Iditarod, dogs are forced to run 1,150 miles over a grueling terrain
in 8 to 15 days, which is the approximate distance between New York City and
Miami. Dog deaths and injuries are common in the race. USA Today sports
columnist Jon Saraceno called the Iditarod "a travesty of grueling proportions"
and
"Ihurtadog." Fox sportscaster Jim Rome called it "I-killed-a-dog." Orlando
Sentinel sports columnist George Diaz said the race is "a barbaric ritual" and
"an
illegal sweatshop for dogs." USA Today business columnist Bruce Horovitz said
the race is a "public-relations minefield." On average, 54% of the dogs who
start the race cannot make it across the finish line.
Please visit the SDAC website <A HREF="http://www.helpsleddogs.org">
http://www.helpsleddogs.org</A> to see pictures, and for more information. Be
sure to
read the quotes on <A HREF="http://www.helpsleddogs.org/remarks.htm">
http://www.helpsleddogs.org/remarks.htm</A> . All of the material on the site is
true
and verifiable.
At least 120 dogs have died in the Iditarod. There is no official count of
dog deaths available for the race's early years. In "WinterDance: the Fine
Madness of Running the Iditarod," Gary Paulsen describes witnessing an Iditarod
musher brutally kicking a dog to death during the race. He wrote, "All the time
he was kicking the dog. Not with the imprecision of anger, the kicks, not kicks
to match his rage but aimed, clinical vicious kicks. Kicks meant to hurt
deeply, to cause serious injury. Kicks meant to kill."
Causes of death have also included strangulation in towlines, internal
hemorrhaging after being gouged by a sled, liver injury, heart failure, and
pneumonia. "Sudden death" and "external myopathy," a fatal condition in which a
dog's
muscles and organs deteriorate during extreme or prolonged exercise, have also
occurred. The 1976 Iditarod winner, Jerry Riley, was accused of striking his
dog with a snow hook (a large, sharp and heavy metal claw). In 1996, one of
Rick Swenson's dogs died while he mushed his team through waist-deep water and
ice. The Iditarod Trail Committee banned both mushers from the race but later
reinstated them. In many states these incidents would be considered animal
cruelty. Swenson is now on the Iditarod Board of Directors.
In the 2001 Iditarod, a sick dog was sent to a prison to be cared for by
inmates and received no veterinary care. He was chained up in the cold and died.
Another dog died by suffocating on his own vomit.
Tom Classen, retired Air Force colonel and Alaskan resident for over 40
years, tells us that the dogs are beaten into submission:
"They've had the hell beaten out of them." "You don't just whisper into their
ears, ‘OK, stand there until I tell you to run like the devil.' They
understand one thing: a beating. These dogs are beaten into submission the same
way
elephants are trained for a circus. The mushers will deny it. And you know what?
They are all lying." -USA Today, March 3, 2000 in Jon Saraceno's column
Beatings and whippings are common. Jim Welch says in his book Speed Mushing
Manual, "I heard one highly respected [sled dog] driver once state that
"‘Alaskans like the kind of dog they can beat on.'" "Nagging a dog team is
cruel and
ineffective...A training device such as a whip is not cruel at all but is
effective." "It is a common training device in use among dog mushers...A whip is
a
very humane training tool."
Mushers believe in "culling" or killing unwanted dogs, including puppies.
Many dogs who are permanently disabled in the Iditarod, or who are unwanted for
any reason, are killed with a shot to the head, dragged or clubbed to death.
"On-going cruelty is the law of many dog lots. Dogs are clubbed with baseball
bats and if they don't pull are dragged to death in harnesses....." wrote
Alaskan Mike Cranford in an article for Alaska's Bush Blade Newspaper (March,
2000).
Jon Saraceno wrote in his March 3, 2000 column in USA Today, "He [Colonel Tom
Classen] confirmed dog beatings and far worse. Like starving dogs to maintain
their most advantageous racing weight. Skinning them to make mittens. Or
dragging them to their death."
The race has led to the proliferation of horrific dog kennels in which the
dogs are treated very cruelly. Many kennels have over 100 dogs and some have as
many as 200. It is standard for the dogs to spend their entire lives outside
tethered to metal chains that can be as short as four feet long. In 1997 the
United States Department of Agriculture determined that the tethering of dogs
was inhumane and not in the animals' best interests. The chaining of dogs as a
primary means of enclosure is prohibited in all cases where federal law
applies. A dog who is permanently tethered is forced to urinate and defecate
where he
sleeps, which conflicts with his natural instinct to eliminate away from his
living area.
Iditarod dogs are victims of cruelty. Please tell your viewers the truth
about this barbaric race.
Sincerely,
Posted for veganvirago@... (Susan Gordon)
PLEASE CROSS POST
I just finished reading Michael Moore's new book, "Dude, Where's My
Country." As with his previous book, "Stupid White Men," this one is a fast
read that attacks political conservatism with humor and wit, but Moore still
does not include animals in his compassion. He specifically dismisses animal
rights and vegetarianism and he uses a quote from General Wesley Clark,
which states Clark hunts, as one reason to support Clark's candidacy for
President. I copy these excerpts from the book at the end of this alert.
Please send Michael Moore INTELLIGENT e-mails, explaining to him why animals
are as deserving of lives free from exploitation as are
minorities/women/laborers and all of the other marginalized human groups for
whom he advocates. Send him lots and lots of e-mails, so he cannot ignore
them, as he ignored my last e-mail (sent after I read "Stupid White Men,"
which derided concern for animals).
Contact Michael Moore at: mike@...
Michael Moore's web site is: http://www.michaelmoore.com/
Excerpts from "Dude, Where's My Country":
In Chapter 10, "How to Talk to Your Conservative Brother-in-Law" (to
convince him that voting Republican is not in his best interest), Moore
advises readers to "admit that the left has made mistakes." He says, ".here'
s a start on what we've been wrong about" (note that many other points, not
concerning animals, are in Moore's list of mistakes the left has made):
1. "Vegetarianism is unhealthy. Humans need protein, and lots of it. Put
down those sprouts and pick up a T-bone!" (page 190)
2. "Animals don't have rights. Yes, they should be treated 'humanely.' Yes,
Tyson Foods and all the others that 'harvest' chickens are disgusting. But
'freeing' chickens from their factory farms is idiotic. They don't know how
to survive in the wild and they're just going to get hit by a truck. And lay
off carrying on about the milk, no matter how bad it is for you. You just
look like a dumbass if you go on national TV, like PETA does, to argue that
beer is better for the body than milk. This shit just makes me want to kick
my dog." (page 192)
Follow Moore's advice and tell Moore how promoting animal abuse is bad for
HIM (AND also for the humans he cares about AND, most importantly, for the
primary victims, the animals).
In Chapter 11, "Bush Removal and Other Spring Cleaning Chores," Moore gives
a list of reasons why General Wesley Clark would be a good choice for the
Democratic nominee for President. One point is (emphasis mine):
"He is for gun control, Says Clark: 'In general, I have got twenty some odd
guns in the house. I LIKE TO HUNT. I have grown up with guns all my life,
but people who like assault weapons - they should join the United States
Army, we have them.' " (page 210-211)
Thank you.
Susan Gordon
PLEASE CROSSPOST
From the Sled Dog Action Coalition, http://www.helpsleddogs.org:
Blind musher Rachael Scdoris will be on the Early Show (CBS,Oct. 20)
discussing her preparations for the Iditarod. Dogs die, become sick and injured
even
when mushers are sighted. Scdoris' dogs will face many added risks in this
already tortuous race. Please ask the Early Show to give its viewers the animal
protection perspective on the Iditarod. Contact information and a sample letter
are below.
Email: earlyshow@...,StormH@...,SmithH@...,
jchen@...
SAMPLE LETTER TO PERSONALIZE
Dear Ms. Chen, Mr. Smith and Ms. Storm:
I understand that on October 20, the blind musher Rachel Scdoris will be on
the Early Show to discuss her preparation for the Iditarod. Please give your
viewers a balanced picture by giving equal time to the animal protection side of
the Iditarod story. The Iditarod is condemned for its cruelties by animal
lovers and animal protection organizations across the United States. Scdoris'
dogs will face added risk in what is already a tortuous race.
In the Iditarod, dogs are forced to run 1,150 miles over a grueling terrain
in 8 to 15 days, which is the approximate distance between New York City and
Miami. Dog deaths and injuries are common in the race. USA Today sports
columnist Jon Saraceno called the Iditarod "a travesty of grueling proportions"
and
"Ihurtadog." Fox sportscaster Jim Rome called it "I-killed-a-dog." Orlando
Sentinel sports columnist George Diaz said the race is "a barbaric ritual" and
"an
illegal sweatshop for dogs." USA Today business columnist Bruce Horovitz said
the race is a "public-relations minefield."
Please visit the SDAC website http://www.helpsleddogs.org to see pictures,
and for more information. Be sure to read the quotes on
http://www.helpsleddogs.org/remarks.htm. All of the material on the site is true
and verifiable.
At least 120 dogs have died in the Iditarod. There is no official count of
dog deaths available for the race's early years. In "WinterDance: the Fine
Madness of Running the Iditarod," Gary Paulsen describes witnessing an Iditarod
musher brutally kicking a dog to death during the race. He wrote, "All the time
he was kicking the dog. Not with the imprecision of anger, the kicks, not kicks
to match his rage but aimed, clinical vicious kicks. Kicks meant to hurt
deeply, to cause serious injury. Kicks meant to kill."
Causes of death have also included strangulation in towlines, internal
hemorrhaging after being gouged by a sled, liver injury, heart failure, and
pneumonia. "Sudden death" and "external myopathy," a fatal condition in which a
dog's
muscles and organs deteriorate during extreme or prolonged exercise, have also
occurred. The 1976 Iditarod winner, Jerry Riley, was accused of striking his
dog with a snow hook (a large, sharp and heavy metal claw). In 1996, one of
Rick Swenson's dogs died while he mushed his team through waist-deep water and
ice. The Iditarod Trail Committee banned both mushers from the race but later
reinstated them. In many states these incidents would be considered animal
cruelty. Swenson is now on the Iditarod Board of Directors.
In the 2001 Iditarod, a sick dog was sent to a prison to be cared for by
inmates and received no veterinary care. He was chained up in the cold and died.
Another dog died by suffocating on his own vomit.
Tom Classen, retired Air Force colonel and Alaskan resident for over 40
years, tells us that the dogs are beaten into submission:
"They've had the hell beaten out of them." "You don't just whisper into their
ears, ‘OK, stand there until I tell you to run like the devil.' They
understand one thing: a beating. These dogs are beaten into submission the same
way
elephants are trained for a circus. The mushers will deny it. And you know what?
They are all lying." -USA Today, March 3, 2000 in Jon Saraceno's column
Beatings and whippings are common. Jim Welch says in his book Speed Mushing
Manual, "I heard one highly respected [sled dog] driver once state that
"‘Alaskans like the kind of dog they can beat on.'" "Nagging a dog team is
cruel and
ineffective...A training device such as a whip is not cruel at all but is
effective." "It is a common training device in use among dog mushers...A whip is
a
very humane training tool."
Mushers believe in "culling" or killing unwanted dogs, including puppies.
Many dogs who are permanently disabled in the Iditarod, or who are unwanted for
any reason, are killed with a shot to the head, dragged or clubbed to death.
"On-going cruelty is the law of many dog lots. Dogs are clubbed with baseball
bats and if they don't pull are dragged to death in harnesses....." wrote
Alaskan Mike Cranford in an article for Alaska's Bush Blade Newspaper (March,
2000).
Jon Saraceno wrote in his March 3, 2000 column in USA Today, "He [Colonel Tom
Classen] confirmed dog beatings and far worse. Like starving dogs to maintain
their most advantageous racing weight. Skinning them to make mittens. Or
dragging them to their death."
The race has led to the proliferation of horrific dog kennels in which the
dogs are treated very cruelly. Many kennels have over 100 dogs and some have as
many as 200. It is standard for the dogs to spend their entire lives outside
tethered to metal chains that can be as short as four feet long. In 1997 the
United States Department of Agriculture determined that the tethering of dogs
was inhumane and not in the animals' best interests. The chaining of dogs as a
primary means of enclosure is prohibited in all cases where federal law
applies. A dog who is permanently tethered is forced to urinate and defecate
where he
sleeps, which conflicts with his natural instinct to eliminate away from his
living area.
Iditarod dogs are victims of cruelty. Please tell your viewers the truth
about this barbaric race.
Sincerely,
http://www.adn.com/outdoors/story/4029753p-4050685c.html
Newspaper editor: letters@...
Outdoor editor: cmedred@...
By Craig Medred (cmedred@...)
Anchorage Daily News
(Published: September 28, 2003)
Would anyone think of letting a legally blind woman or man race in the Indy
500 -- with or without visual interpreters?
Of course not.
Why?
Because a blind driver would compromise the safety of other drivers.
How then can the board of directors of the Iditarod Trail Sled Dog Race make
the decision to let a blind musher race a dog team to Nome?
Because the only safety being compromised here is that of the dogs.
Because it is easy to grant our feelings for other people preference over
the safety of animals that cannot speak to protect themselves.
This is easy to understand. Frankly, I think it would be wonderful if
legally blind musher Rachael Scdoris took a dog team to Nome. I'd even volunteer
to
gas up my snowmobile and help guide her the 1,000 miles north from Wasilla if
she wants to take a dog trek up the Iditarod Trail.
But to let her race to Nome in the Iditarod Trail Sled Dog Race is wrong
because it ignores the safety of the animals doing the racing. Were the Iditarod
a human-powered event, it would be different.
Humans can talk. They can tell you if they are near exhaustion. They can
yell if they get arms or legs tangled in lines. They can even be forced to
confess the extent of those little injuries that might not appear significant
but
are handicapping performance.
Dogs can't do these things. Dogs depend on a musher to spot a change in gait
that indicates something is wrong, or to get the sled stopped quickly and
safely if one of the team somehow becomes dangerously tangled in the lines, or
to
spot a moose on the trail ahead before the team runs into it.
And these are just some of the dangers that arise every time dogs are
harnessed up for a run. They are minimal dangers for a team out for a walk. They
are
increasing dangers for every mile per hour the team goes faster. Speed
changes everything in racing, and it doesn't matter if one is talking cars,
snowmobiles, sled dogs or humans.
Simply by trying to keep up with the Iditarod pace -- even if she travels at
the very back of the pack -- Scdoris will be putting more stress on her dogs
than she would in a taking a leisurely sled-dog tour to Nome.
Scdoris told the Iditarod board she can detect problems developing by the
way a change in gait of an individual dog filters back along the gangline to her
sled. I find that difficult to believe, but I am willing to accept that
people without sight hone their other senses far more acutely than the rest of
us.
Scdoris, unfortunately, hasn't seen the Iditarod Trail. There is no
comparison with the groomed trails she's used to. There are parts of the
Iditarod
where no one, no matter how good his or her sense of feel, could possibly tell
anything from the pull of the gangline because the sled is bouncing everywhere
or, as in Happy River Gorge, the dogs aren't pulling at all. They are out front
running for their lives as gravity propels the sled downward.
Years ago, I remember helping musher Paul Rupple untangle the foot of a dog
from a tugline at the base of the Happy River hill. Normally, dogs that get a
foot in these lines are able to free it themselves. But this dog had somehow
gotten a couple wraps around its ankle and was in trouble. The other dogs in
the team didn't care. They were exhilarated by the wild run down the hill and
raring to charge on along the smooth surface of the frozen river.
Had Rupple not been able to see what was going on, the team might well have
kept going ahead at top speed until the trapped dog's leg snapped or his
dragging body smashed into something, prompting a howl.
Scdoris would not have been able to see or feel this, nor would her visual
interpreters have been any help until the howling started.
This is not some farfetched scenario. Sighted mushers, who can see and react
immediately, have lost dogs in situations just like this. Jason Barron had
one strangle in a tangle in the Dalzell Gorge in 1993. Iditarod champ Martin
Buser lost one to internal bleeding after it hit a tree in 1989. Other dogs have
died in similar ways.
That said, let me add that there is no doubt that circumstances could be
manipulated to make it possible for Scdoris to safely take a dog team through
the
Alaska Range and on to Nome. But there is no way to do that during a race.
Let's consider just one of many problem areas: The three-step drop into the
Happy River Gorge.
To get down the cliffs without undue risk to the dogs, Scdoris would really
need a snowmachine idling along in front of her team at 5 mph to keep the dogs
from breaking into a lope as they are prone to do. She'd need verbal
instructions on where to stand to keep the sled from rolling off the sides of
the
trail as it switchbacks down the cliffs. Usually, the instructions would be left
runner and brake to the first turn, right runner and brake to the next turn,
left runner and brake to the bottom, but there are no givens on the Iditarod.
The trail changes year to year -- what trail there is.
And that's the biggest problem. What Scdoris would need at Happy River Gorge
more than anything is good trail. Under normal circumstances, she won't get
it. By the time back-of-the-pack Iditarod racers, including Scdoris, get to the
Happy River Gorge, the teams that have gone before have turned the trail into
a trench.
As drivers descend, standing on a piece of snowmobile track called a "drag
brake," they cut a deeper and deeper groove. Sometimes it gets so deep the hill
becomes difficult to negotiate, even on a snowmobile. By then, the Happy
River Gorge is a serious challenge for mushers who can see and prepare. The hill
is simply no place for a blind musher.
Were Scdoris on a sled-dog trek, she could park her team at the top of the
hill and wait for others traveling with her to repair the trail. Personally,
I'd be happy to take my snow shovel and go fill in the rut, or chop it out, to
make the trail safe. But Scdoris doesn't want to go on an Iditarod trek.
She wants to be in the Iditarod race, which means there is no time for
stopping to fix the trail. She and her visual interpreters will just have to
plow
ahead no matter the conditions.
That she has an agent should have been all the red flag the Iditarod board
needed. Why does one hire an agent? To help them acquire money or fame or both.
Money and fame happen to form the crossbars for the cross on which
animal-rights activists have tried to crucify the Iditarod.
It's all enough to make a seasoned Iditarod observer wonder if everyone
involved with the race has somehow forgotten what happened to five-time Iditarod
champ Rick Swenson in 1996. He was booted from the race after the accidental
death of one of his dogs in overflow. There were questions about whether Swenson
had been able to see well enough to ensure the safety of his dogs on the
Skwentna River. Those questions centered on whether Swenson should have had his
headlight on or off.
I well remember Swenson, a member of the current Iditarod Trail Committee
board, being irate that people who'd never been out on a moonlit river couldn't
grasp that you can often see better by moonlight than by headlight. In
moonlight, of course, a musher can't see as well as in daylight, but by all
indications a sighted musher can still see better in moonlight than Scdoris can
in
daylight.
Does the Iditarod, which has come to pride itself on dog care, really want
to gamble with dog safety in this way? If it does, and a dog dies in Scdoris'
team, who is responsible? A 18-year-old musher pushed into the race by her
boosterish father, or the race board that lacked the courage to stand up and say
"no"?
The board apparently hopes to avoid this question altogether by setting up a
scenario which makes it difficult for Scdoris to qualify for the big race.
She must, for instance, start all over in obtaining the qualifying standards,
and she must, along the way, demonstrate the efficacy of her visual
interpreters. Clearly the hope is that Scdoris will fade away before the race
begins in
March.
The fade-away strategy has become the politically astute way to handle
delicate issues in America today, but it is ethically bankrupt -- no matter how
hard it might be to tell Scdoris "no.''
And it is hard. Every caring person can empathize with the plea of Access
Alaska's Jim Beck to "come out into the light and open your hearts and make a
decision out of love for your fellow beings.''
We all want to love our fellow beings. Unfortunately, however, humans aren't
the only "fellow beings'' that must be considered in this case.
There are the dogs. They count on people to rise above simple, human
emotions, accept the fact that life isn't always fair and deal with it. I'm
sorry
Scdoris is blind. I'm sorry that puts limits on her life.
But we are all limited. There are no doubt dozens of things Scdoris does far
better than me. There are no doubt things she does better than any Iditarod
musher. She needs to find those things and pursue them instead of sinking her
competitive energy into the idea of running the Iditarod race.
It is a race. Let's not forget that.
It is a race.
It's about mushers -- be they the best in the sport or the merely mediocre
-- trying to help their dogs get the absolute best out of themselves in a race
against the clock. Scdoris' lack of vision makes it difficult for her to meet
that standard. And the harder she tries, the more she puts her dogs at risk.
Is that what we all really want? Is this the way we make ourselves feel good
about our humanity?
Call me a stupid old dog lover if you must, but the Iditarod board appears
to have made a decision here with far too little concern for the real athletes
in the race.
Daily News outdoor editor Craig Medred's opinion column appears on Sunday.
He can be reached at 257-4588 or at cmedred@....
[Boughton was the owner of the "animal tour bus from hell."]
Web posted Sunday, August 24, 2003
Boughton sentenced in animal cruelty case
By PHIL HERMANEK
Peninsula Clarion
The woman charged with animal cruelty for keeping dozens of underfed,
ungroomed dogs in Sterling received a suspended sentence of a year in jail, a
$5,000
fine and was placed on five years probation in Kenai District Court on Friday.
As part of the sentence handed down by Magistrate David S. Landry, Carolyn
Boughton is forbidden from owning any animals during the length of her probation
other than the 13-year-old miniature schnauzer she currently has, and she is
not allowed to breed any animals.
Additionally, Boughton was ordered to pay restitution for the cost of caring
for 66 dogs that were rescued from property she rented in Sterling. That cost
is to be determined by the state, according to Landry.
The case arose when Alaska State Troopers investigated a complaint that
Boughton was housing numerous Bouviers and Kerry blue terriers in a bus and
trailer
in Sterling without food or water.
When troopers went to the site on Spruce Road on Nov. 5, 2001, they found six
dead dogs, including four Bouviers and two terriers, one terrier that had to
be euthanized because of its weak condition and one that needed to have an eye
removed due to severe infection.
In addition, 65 live dogs, many covered with frozen urine and feces, were
found suffering from malnutrition and extreme dehydration.
Sixty-six dogs were rescued by the Alaska Society for the Prevention of
Cruelty to Animals and all were placed in adoptive homes, according to Diane
Zarfoss, clinic coordinator in Anchorage.
In sentencing Boughton, Landry said, "There's no question, Miss Boughton,
that your heart might have been in a good place, but the worst thing that could
have happened to these dogs was coming into your care.
"I have no doubt of your love, but you were not capable, financially and
mentally, and not physically capable of properly taking care of these animals,"
he
said.
The 58-year-old Boughton, who arrived in court in a wheelchair, said she
recently had undergone gall bladder surgery and was in need of operations on her
neck and back. She also told the court that at the time her dogs were
discovered by troopers, she was undergoing financial difficulties that prevented
her
from being able to adequately feed her dogs.
She had been evicted from the property in Sterling and was commuting from
Nikiski to care for the animals when she could. She also said she was paying
someone $100 a month to feed the dogs, but the person was not feeding them or
providing water as agreed.
Landry said the situation goes to the heart of American society.
"We have had a love affair with animals in this country since the time of the
Pilgrims," he said. "We expect people who take on the responsibility of
animals to care for them.
"This court, this community, this peninsula demands it. If you have trouble,
wave a white flag," he said.
Prior to sentencing, Boughton told the court she was prevented from having
help.
"I would never have harmed any of my dogs," she said.
She said she had sold her property on the Kenai River where she was breeding
dogs for years hoping to create a new breed of miniature Bouviers. She
acquired the bus and trailer and was planning to leave Alaska with all the dogs,
but
she alleged someone sabotaged the bus and one event after another prevented
her from leaving.
Boughton also said she had set up a living space in the bus for herself so
she could stay with her dogs.
"As far as my dogs, I would've rather died myself," she said.
"I had the top winning Bouviers in the nation. I was proud of those dogs, and
I showed them. I worked to miniaturize Bouviers for 10 years," she said. "I
didn't have a puppy mill. I wasn't a collector. All I was going to keep was my
miniatures."
Describing the sentence as being geared toward her rehabilitation and toward
deterring her from further animal breeding, Landry ordered Boughton to allow
state troopers to perform welfare checks on her schnauzer at her Nikiski
residence during her probation and said any interference with troopers would
result
in revocation of her probation.
Boughton's court-appointed attorney, Brooke Browning, said the sentence was
close to what she expected.
"I feel in all of this, Miss Boughton has gotten lost," Browning said.
"I'm glad she got her day in court. This wasn't a case of malice or cruelty."
Of the sentence, assistant district attorney June Stein said, "The court was
right on point."
http://www.peninsulaclarion.com/stories/082403/new_082403new004001.shtml
Carolyn Boughton, the subject of the article The Animal Tour Bus from Hell
(see below), will finally be coming to trial on August 5, 2003. The Alaska SPCA
asks that you email to the D.A. at anna_laroche@.... Please
personalize the sample letter:
Dear Mr. McConnell:
Regarding the Carolyn Boughton Animal Cruelty case scheduled for August 5,
2003 in the Kenai District Court. I ask that Carolyn Boughton be prohibited from
ever owning or having custody of animals or from being associated with any
animal breeding or selling.
I understand that she has now three dogs now and intends to breed horses. If
this occurs, the animal cruelty will continue.
It is important that she receive mental health counseling, as she appears to
have the
symptoms of an "animal collector."
Sincerely,
The Animal Tour Bus from Hell
Commentary by Margery Glickman
Animals In Print
(Published: September 22, 2002)
Beyond the borders of Alaska's large cities, acts of barbarism against
animals can easily happen. Alaska, without a statewide humane officer to
enforce animal cruelty laws, leaves animal control up to over-burdened state
troopers who do not adequately understand the animal cruelty laws. The saga
of how the Alaska SPCA saved 66 animals from brutal treatment in Sterling,
Alaska shows why a statewide humane officer, with an adequate support staff,
is desperately needed to prevent atrocities in the future.
Here's what happened. With each advancing step, Alaska SPCA volunteer Nancy
Wall's flashlight illuminated scenes of devastation and misery on a dark
bitterly cold winter afternoon in Sterling when she went to check on Carolyn
Boughton's animals. "The snow was littered with the bodies of Boughton's dead
cats. There were legs and skulls from cats who had been torn apart and
eaten," Wall said.
Each time Wall moved her flashlight along the ground she found more horrors.
"I tripped over dead dogs, " she said. One Bouvier des Flandres, a large
black herding and guard dog, died tethered to a tree on a short chain when
his legs became entangled in the wire from a fallen tarp. Two other dogs
choked to death trying to free themselves from their tethers, their collars
pulled back on their eyes. A pinch collar (a collar with blunt prongs that
pinch the dog's skin when the collar is tightened) dug deep into one dog's
neck.
In the dark, Wall could smell the stench long before she saw its source--an
old Greyhound tour bus. "I looked in the window and nausea almost overwhelmed
me," Wall said. Through the windows she could hear the plaintive cries of the
animals Boughton kept captive inside.
Wall brought in state troopers, who instead of removing Boughton's animals
from their hellish conditions, told Boughton she had several days to make
improvements. Determined to help the animals, Wall convinced Broughton to
transfer their ownership to the Alaska SPCA. Diane Zarfoss and her team of
one veterinarian and six Alaska SPCA rescuers then drove 2 1/2 hours from
Anchorage to save the remaining dogs from their agony.
"The situation was devastating," Zarfoss said. "We had to wear gas masks to
go inside, because the smell of urine and feces was so strong." The bus was
stripped on the inside and plywood boxes with dogs were stacked along the
walls. Each box had two to four holes the size of a quarter, but otherwise
the dogs were enclosed in solid plywood. Some boxes held two dogs.
Zarfoss explained that the boxes were filled with urine and feces piled six
to eight inches thick and that the dogs' fur was matted with excrement. Their
eyes were weepy from living in their own feces and urine, and with the -20
degree temperature, their eyes froze shut. One Kerry blue terrier's eye was
so damaged that it was later removed and all the dogs received eye
medication."
Food bowls weren't placed in the wooden crates, Zarfoss said. The dogs were
on the brink of starvation and dehydration. Some Kerry Blue Terriers tried to
chew their way out but died when their legs were wedged into the cracks in
the plywood. "Other dogs froze to death. With their food bowls just out of
reach," Zarfoss said, "the dogs tethered outside died lunging to get at them.
In desperation, some had dug holes to get at tree roots to eat."
Domestic animals get little protection from abuse
The Alaska SPCA warned state troopers about the animals' steadily
deteriorating situation months before, but the troopers would not intervene.
Alaska has more protection for wild animals than for domestic ones,
particularly dogs, cats and horses. "It is a disgrace that the laws and big
budgets for domestic animals are frowned upon by the politicians," Alaska
SPCA Executive Director Ethel Christensen said.
Christensen says that for decades the Alaska SPCA has had complaints from
tourists and others asking it to do something about the atrocities in the
areas of the State where there are no local laws. The Alaska SPCA has begged
for help from the State to tighten laws and for a statewide humane officer to
enforce them. Now is an ideal time to create this position.
Animals get a new start in life
The Alaska SPCA rescued 66 dogs including Bouvier des Flandres, Kerry blue
terriers, malamutes and Australian shepherd-husky mix dogs and brought them
to Anchorage in airline kennels which the people of Anchorage had donated.
There the Alaska SPCA set up triage for the dogs in a rented warehouse where
the dogs were medicated, groomed and fed. A group of Alaska SPCA volunteers
worked long and hard to give these dogs a new start in life. A malemute named
Stormy was the last of the 66 dogs to be adopted; he left for a new home
several weeks ago with a wagging tail and a bounce in his step.
Cost of rescue puts Alaska SPCA in dire financial straits
The cost of the rescue exceeded $30,000, forcing the Alaska SPCA to take out
a mortgage on its shelter property. The Alaska SPCA is maxed out financially
as it has never received help from any governmental source. "These are the
very people that support the sled dogs for economic reasons," Christensen
said. "And, little do they realize the picture they have painted to those
outside Alaska."
The Alaska SPCA is a non-profit, privately funded organization with no
affiliation with the government or any other organization. The organization's
founder and Executive Director, Ethel Christensen, has not taken a salary
since she began the organization in 1966.
How you can help:
Please send your tax-deductible donations to the Alaska SPCA:
Alaska SPCA
549 W. International Airport Road, Ste B2
Anchorage, AK 99518
[Alaska's new Governor is Murkowski]: Write to Alaska Governor Frank
Murkowski to ask that a statewide humane officer, with an adequate support
staff, be
hired immediately. Email: frank_murkowski@...
Visit the Alaska SPCA website page www.alaskaspca.org/gmshelter.html to view
pictures of Boughton's property and to see the welcome the dogs received in
Anchorage.
Margery Glickman is the director of the Sled Dog Action Coalition.
To subscribe to Animals In Print, a free online newsletter, email:
Ljbeane1@....
(Animals In Print has given permission for this article to be reprinted.)
PLEASE CROSSPOST
Tell Wyden and Harkin that having a disability is no excuse for abusing
animals:
http://wyden.senate.gov/contact
Phone: (202) 224-5244
http://harkin.senate.gov/contact/contact.cfm
Phone: (202) 224-3254
http://www.adn.com/front/story/3549838p-3580895c.html
Iditarod officials decide to reconsider blind musher's petition
Americans With Disabilities Act may apply for Oregon teenager
By ZAZ HOLLANDER
Anchorage Daily News
(Published: July 30, 2003)
WASILLA -- After putting off a decision in June, Iditarod Trail Sled Dog Race
officials will reconsider special accommodations for a legally blind Oregon
teenager bent on competing next year.
Iditarod Board president Rick Koch has scheduled a special meeting for Sept.
19 with an agenda focused on two questions, Koch said Tuesday.
Does the Americans With Disabilities Act apply to "the last great race," an
1,100-mile odyssey through the Alaska Range to Nome?
And if it does, what can the board do to accommodate 18-year-old Rachael
Scdoris, who wants to run the Iditarod with radio guidance from two
snowmachiners
on some treacherous stretches?
Scdoris formally petitioned the board in early June, but members did not
specifically discuss her request then. They did, however, vote down Koch's
proposal for a broader policy that would allow them to consider accommodation
requests from any disabled entrants.
Later, Iditarod veterans such as Dan Seavey, a board member, said allowing
snowmachine assistance for Scdoris would change the nature of the race and could
jeopardize the safety of other dog teams.
Then, in early July, Scdoris paid her entry fee and signed up for next year's
race, one of 78 mushers and more than 25 rookies to do so.
Koch said he called for the September meeting after receiving numerous
messages urging the board to take action.
"I decided we should talk about this again," he said.
Among letters sent to the board are several attention-grabbers: one from the
attorney who represented disabled golfer Casey Martin in his successful U.S.
Supreme Court bid to use a golf cart on the PGA Tour, one from U.S. Sen. Ron
Wyden, D-Ore., and one from U.S. Sen. Tom Harkin, the Iowa Democrat who authored
the ADA.
All three urge the board to allow Scdoris to run the Iditarod with the type
of assistance she requested, and warn that a court battle over the Iditarod's
ADA obligations could be lengthy.
In his letter, Harkin says he has personally taken "a special interest" in
media coverage of Scdoris' Iditarod bid and believes the landmark legislation
enacted in 1990 does apply to her case.
"I can assure you that an exclusionary decision such as the one taken by the
(Iditarod board) ... is exactly what we in Congress intended to prevent when
we enacted the ADA," Harkin wrote.
It wasn't clear whether Scdoris will travel to Alaska for the September
meeting, though that's a possibility, according to her agent, Paul Herschell,
with
Sports Unlimited in Portland, Ore.
"We understand this is a difficult issue the Iditarod is experiencing for the
first time," Herschell said Tuesday. "We hope everyone will approach the
meeting with an open mind."
Meanwhile, Scdoris is putting together her training plan and choosing
qualifying races, as required of any musher.
She tentatively plans to race in December's Seney 300 Training Run, an Upper
Michigan qualifier, Herschell said. Race organizers are allowing her to use
visual interpreters on snowmachines.
Iditarod officials previously have said that any race that allows outside
assistance violates the rules of the Iditarod and therefore can't be considered
a
qualifier.
Koch, who now supports Scdoris, said that thousands of snowmachines zoom up
and down the trail over the course of the race. Two more to aid the young
musher shouldn't make any difference, he said.
He said it will be up to the board to decide whether Scdoris can qualify
while using help.
Reporter Zaz Hollander can be reached at zhollander@....
From the Sled Dog Action Coalition, http://www.helpsleddogs.org:
Iditarod race winner Libby Riddles is glorifying the cruel Iditarod dog sled
race in talks on board Princess cruises. In its brochure, Princess asks
passengers to listen as Riddles "shares moments of her inspirational quest."
Rather than being inspirational, the Iditarod is an example of the dark
underbelly of animal abuse and suffering that exists in Alaska. Living tethered
to
four foot chains in their own waste, Iditarod dogs face a bleak existence even
when they are not racing. Some dogs have their vocal cords cut, and many
others are beaten and killed. Iditarod dogs are unhappy prisoners with no chance
of parole.
Please tell Princess that the Iditarod dog sled race is not inspirational and
should not be promoted.
EMAIL: rames@..., media@...
SAMPLE LETTER TO PERSONALIZE:
Dear Mr. Ames:
I understand that Iditarod winner Libby Riddles is promoting the Iditarod dog
sled race on board Princess cruises. Rather than being inspirational, the
Iditarod is an example of barbarism. Please stop promoting this cruel race and
the evils associated with it.
Mushers treat their dogs abominably. In the Iditarod, dogs are forced to run
1,150 miles over a grueling terrain in 8 to 15 days, which is the approximate
distance between Miami and New York City. Dog deaths and injuries are common
in the race. USA Today sports columnist Jon Saraceno called the Iditarod "a
travesty of grueling proportions" and "Ihurtadog." Fox sportscaster Jim Rome
called it "I-killed-a-dog." Orlando Sentinel sports columnist George Diaz said
the
race is "a barbaric ritual" and "an illegal sweatshop for dogs." USA Today
business columnist Bruce Horovitz said the race is a "public-relations
minefield."
Please visit the Sled Dog Action Coalition website
http://www.helpsleddogs.org to see pictures, and for more information. Be sure
to read the quotes on
http://www.helpsleddogs.org/remarks.htm. All of the material on the site is true
and verifiable.
At least 120 dogs have died in the Iditarod. There is no official count of
dog deaths available for the race's early years. In "WinterDance: the Fine
Madness of Running the Iditarod," Gary Paulsen describes witnessing an Iditarod
musher brutally kicking a dog to death during the race. He wrote, "All the time
he was kicking the dog. Not with the imprecision of anger, the kicks, not kicks
to match his rage but aimed, clinical vicious kicks. Kicks meant to hurt
deeply, to cause serious injury. Kicks meant to kill."
Causes of death have also included strangulation in towlines, internal
hemorrhaging after being gouged by a sled, liver injury, heart failure, and
pneumonia. "Sudden death" and "external myopathy," a fatal condition in which a
dog's
muscles and organs deteriorate during extreme or prolonged exercise, have also
occurred. The 1976 Iditarod winner, Jerry Riley, was accused of striking his
dog with a snow hook (a large, sharp and heavy metal claw). In 1996, one of
Rick Swenson's dogs died while he mushed his team through waist-deep water and
ice. The Iditarod Trail Committee banned both mushers from the race but later
reinstated them. In many states these incidents would be considered animal
cruelty. Swenson is now on the Iditarod Board of Directors.
In the 2001 Iditarod, a sick dog was sent to a prison to be cared for by
inmates and received no veterinary care. He was chained up in the cold and died.
Another dog died by suffocating on his own vomit.
Tom Classen, retired Air Force colonel and Alaskan resident for over 40
years, tells us that the dogs are beaten into submission:
"They've had the hell beaten out of them." "You don't just whisper into their
ears, ‘OK, stand there until I tell you to run like the devil.' They
understand one thing: a beating. These dogs are beaten into submission the same
way
elephants are trained for a circus. The mushers will deny it. And you know what?
They are all lying." -USA Today, March 3, 2000 in Jon Saraceno's column
Beatings and whippings are common. Jim Welch says in his book Speed Mushing
Manual, "I heard one highly respected [sled dog] driver once state that
"‘Alaskans like the kind of dog they can beat on.'" "Nagging a dog team is
cruel and
ineffective...A training device such as a whip is not cruel at all but is
effective." "It is a common training device in use among dog mushers...A whip is
a
very humane training tool."
Mushers believe in "culling" or killing unwanted dogs, including puppies.
Many dogs who are permanently disabled in the Iditarod, or who are unwanted for
any reason, are killed with a shot to the head, dragged or clubbed to death.
"On-going cruelty is the law of many dog lots. Dogs are clubbed with baseball
bats and if they don't pull are dragged to death in harnesses....." wrote
Alaskan Mike Cranford in an article for Alaska's Bush Blade Newspaper (March,
2000).
Jon Saraceno wrote in his March 3, 2000 column in USA Today, "He [Colonel Tom
Classen] confirmed dog beatings and far worse. Like starving dogs to maintain
their most advantageous racing weight. Skinning them to make mittens. Or
dragging them to their death."
The race has led to the proliferation of horrific dog kennels in which the
dogs are treated very cruelly. Many kennels have over 100 dogs and some have as
many as 200. It is standard for the dogs to spend their entire lives outside
tethered to metal chains that can be as short as four feet long. In 1997 the
United States Department of Agriculture determined that the tethering of dogs
was inhumane and not in the animals' best interests. The chaining of dogs as a
primary means of enclosure is prohibited in all cases where federal law
applies. A dog who is permanently tethered is forced to urinate and defecate
where he
sleeps, which conflicts with his natural instinct to eliminate away from his
living area.
Iditarod dogs are unhappy prisoners with no chance of parole. Please stop
promoting this cruel race.
Sincerely,
From the Sled Dog Action Coalition, http://www.helpsleddogs.org:
Four-time Iditarod winner Susan Butcher will be featured during USA Network's
PGA Tour coverage of the Bank of America Colonial in its great moments in
women's sports vignettes airing on May 22 and May 23.
Great woman do not rely on using and exploiting animals for their acclaim.
Please ask USA Network, PGA Tour and Bank of America to exclude Butcher from
its great moments in women's sports vignettes. See below for contact
information and a sample letter to personalize.
One of the dogs used by Butcher in the 1994 Iditarod died from exertional
myopathy, otherwise known as "sudden death syndrome."
Eyewitnesses report that Butcher permanently tethers her dogs on short
chains. Tethering is psychologically damaging, cruel and unnatural. A dog who
is permanently tethered is forced to urinate and defecate where he sleeps,
which conflicts with his natural instinct to eliminate away from his living
area. Dogs are pack animals and tethering prevents them from having normal
interactions.
EMAILS FOR USA Network (Vivendi), Bank of America, and PGA Tour:
eileen.mclaughlin@..., barbara.j.desoer@...,
moorhouse@..., hiross@...,
jeff.hershberger@...
SAMPLE LETTER TO PERSONALIZE:
Dear Ms. McLaughlin, Ms. Desoer, Mr. Moorhouse, Mr. Hershberger and Ms. Ross:
Please do not feature four-time Iditarod race winner Susan Butcher during USA
Network's PGA Tour coverage of the Bank of America Colonial in its great
moments in women's sports vignettes. Great woman do not rely on using and
exploiting animals for their acclaim.
One of the dogs used by Butcher in the 1994 Iditarod died from exertional
myopathy, otherwise known as "sudden death syndrome."
In the book "Susan Butcher and the Iditarod Trail," Ellen Dolan said that
Butcher hallucinated when racing in the Iditarod. A musher who hallucinates
cannot make judgements or care for her dogs. Dolan also said Butcher trained
her dogs by having them pull an ATV.
Eyewitnesses report that Butcher permanently tethers her dogs on short
chains. Tethering is psychologically damaging, cruel and unnatural. A dog who
is permanently tethered is forced to urinate and defecate where he sleeps,
which conflicts with his natural instinct to eliminate away from his living
area. Dogs are pack animals and tethering prevents them from having normal
interactions. Permanent tethering makes many dogs very aggressive.
In the Iditarod, dogs are forced to run 1,150 miles over a grueling terrain
in 8 to 15 days, which is the approximate distance between New York City and
Miami. Dog deaths and injuries are common in the race. USA Today sports
columnist Jon Saraceno called the Iditarod "a travesty of grueling
proportions" and "Ihurtadog." Fox sportscaster Jim Rome called it
"I-killed-a-dog." Orlando Sentinel sports columnist George Diaz said the race
is "a barbaric ritual" and "an illegal sweatshop for dogs." USA Today
business columnist Bruce Horovitz said the race is a "public-relations
minefield."
Please visit the Sled Dog Action Coalition website
http://www.helpsleddogs.org to see pictures, and for more information. Be
sure to read the quotes on http://www.helpsleddogs.org/remarks.htm. All of
the material on the site is true and verifiable.
At least 120 dogs have died in the Iditarod. There is no official count of
dog deaths available for the race's early years. Causes of death have also
included strangulation in towlines, internal hemorrhaging after being gouged
by a sled, liver injury, heart failure, and pneumonia. "Sudden death" and
"external myopathy," a fatal condition in which a dog's muscles and organs
deteriorate during extreme or prolonged exercise, have also occurred. In the
2001 Iditarod, a sick dog was sent to a prison to be cared for by inmates and
received no veterinary care. He was chained up in the cold and died. Another
dog died by suffocating on his own vomit.
Tom Classen, retired Air Force colonel and Alaskan resident for over 40
years, tells us that the dogs are beaten into submission:
"They've had the hell beaten out of them." "You don't just whisper into their
ears, ‘OK, stand there until I tell you to run like the devil.' They
understand one thing: a beating. These dogs are beaten into submission the
same way elephants are trained for a circus. The mushers will deny it. And
you know what? They are all lying." -USA Today, March 3, 2000 in Jon
Saraceno's column
Beatings and whippings are common. Jim Welch says in his book Speed Mushing
Manual, "I heard one highly respected [sled dog] driver once state that
"‘Alaskans like the kind of dog they can beat on.'" "Nagging a dog team is
cruel and ineffective...A training device such as a whip is not cruel at all
but is effective." "It is a common training device in use among dog
mushers...A whip is a very humane training tool."
Mushers believe in "culling" or killing unwanted dogs, including puppies.
Many dogs who are permanently disabled in the Iditarod, or who are unwanted
for any reason, are killed with a shot to the head, dragged or clubbed to
death. "On-going cruelty is the law of many dog lots. Dogs are clubbed with
baseball bats and if they don't pull are dragged to death in harnesses....."
wrote Alaskan Mike Cranford in an article for Alaska's Bush Blade Newspaper
(March, 2000).
Jon Saraceno wrote in his March 3, 2000 column in USA Today, "He [Colonel Tom
Classen] confirmed dog beatings and far worse. Like starving dogs to maintain
their most advantageous racing weight. Skinning them to make mittens. Or
dragging them to their death."
Sincerely,
From the Sled Dog Action Coalition, http://www.helpsleddogs.org
Thanks to your emails Hain-Celestial will no longer be involved in the
Iditarod. Please thank them by writing to consumeraffairs@...
A list of organizations that still support this brutal race can be found on
http://www.helpsleddogs.org/sponsors.htm . Email addresses in block form are
at the bottom of the page.
From the Sled Dog Action Coalition, http://www.helpsleddogs.org
CNN is promoting the barbaric Iditarod dog sled race in an article on its
website. The article ignored all the facts which have caused the Iditarod to
be condemned by animal protection groups and animal lovers, and claimed that
Iditarod rules promote the safe treatment of the dogs.
Please educate CNN's president about Iditarod race cruelties, and ask that
CNN's readers and viewers be given the animal protection viewpoint.
Email: jim.walton@....
PLEASE PERSONALIZE SAMPLE LETTER:
Dear Mr. Walton:
I am outraged that CNN is promoting the barbaric Iditarod dog sled race on
its website and ask that you give your readers and viewers the animal
protection side of the Iditarod story. Contrary to what this article claims,
Iditarod race rules do not promote the safe treatment of dogs. On average,
50% of the dogs who start the race cannot make it across the finish line.
Unlike many dog sled races in the United States, the Iditarod does not ban
the use of whips. Iditarod rules do not require vets to give the dogs
physicals at the checkpoints. In fact, many mushers breeze through many of
the checkpoints so that the dogs only get visual checks, if that. The
Iditarod rules do not require sick and injured dogs to be under a vet's care.
Many sick and injured dogs are sent to a prison to be cared for by inmates
and receive no veterinary care. In the 2001 Iditarod, a sick dog was sent to
this prison, was chained up in the cold, and died.
Mushers treat their dogs abominably. In the Iditarod, dogs are forced to run
1,150 miles over a grueling terrain in 8 to14 days, which is the approximate
distance between Atlanta and Portland, Maine. Dog deaths and injuries are
common in the race. USA Today sports columnist Jon Saraceno called the
Iditarod "a travesty of grueling proportions" and "Ihurtadog." Fox
sportscaster Jim Rome called it "I-killed-a-dog." Orlando Sentinel sports
columnist George Diaz said the race is "a barbaric ritual" and "an illegal
sweatshop for dogs." USA Today business columnist Bruce Horovitz said the
race is a "public-relations minefield."
Please visit the Sled Dog Action Coalition (SDAC) website
http://www.helpsleddogs.org to see pictures, and for more information. Be
sure to read the quotes on http://www.helpsleddogs.org/remarks.htm.
At least 119 dogs have died in the Iditarod. There is no official count of
dog deaths available for the race's early years. Causes of death have also
included strangulation in towlines, internal hemorrhaging after being gouged
by a sled, liver injury, heart failure, and pneumonia. "Sudden death" and
"external myopathy," a fatal condition in which a dog's muscles and organs
deteriorate during extreme or prolonged exercise, have also occurred. The
1976 Iditarod winner, Jerry Riley, was accused of striking his dog with a
snow hook (a large, sharp and heavy metal claw). In 1996, one of Rick
Swenson's dogs died while he mushed his team through waist-deep water and
ice. The Iditarod Trail Committee banned both mushers from the race but later
reinstated them. In many states these incidents would be considered animal
cruelty. Swenson is now on the Iditarod Board of Directors.
Tom Classen, retired Air Force colonel and Alaskan resident for over 40
years, tells us that the dogs are beaten into submission:
"They've had the hell beaten out of them." "You don't just whisper into their
ears, ‘OK, stand there until I tell you to run like the devil.' They
understand one thing: a beating. These dogs are beaten into submission the
same way elephants are trained for a circus. The mushers will deny it. And
you know what? They are all lying." -USA Today, March 3, 2000 in Jon
Saraceno's column
Beatings and whippings are common. Jim Welch says in his book Speed Mushing
Manual, "I heard one highly respected [sled dog] driver once state that
"‘Alaskans like the kind of dog they can beat on.'" "Nagging a dog team is
cruel and ineffective...A training device such as a whip is not cruel at all
but is effective." "It is a common training device in use among dog
mushers...A whip is a very humane training tool."
Mushers believe in "culling" or killing unwanted dogs, including puppies.
Many dogs who are permanently disabled in the Iditarod, or who are unwanted
for any reason, are killed with a shot to the head, dragged or clubbed to
death. "On-going cruelty is the law of many dog lots. Dogs are clubbed with
baseball bats and if they don't pull are dragged to death in harnesses....."
wrote Alaskan Mike Cranford in an article for Alaska's Bush Blade Newspaper
(March, 2000).
Jon Saraceno wrote in his March 3, 2000 column in USA Today, "He [Colonel Tom
Classen] confirmed dog beatings and far worse. Like starving dogs to maintain
their most advantageous racing weight. Skinning them to make mittens. Or
dragging them to their death."
The race has led to the proliferation of concentration-camp-like dog kennels
in which the dogs are treated very cruelly. Many kennels have over 100 dogs
and some have as many as 200. It is standard for the dogs to spend their
entire lives outside tethered to metal chains that can be as short as four
feet long. In 1997 the United States Department of Agriculture determined
that the tethering of dogs was inhumane and not in the animals' best
interests. The chaining of dogs as a primary means of enclosure is prohibited
in all cases where federal law applies. A dog who is permanently tethered is
forced to urinate and defecate where he sleeps, which conflicts with his
natural instinct to eliminate away from his living area. Because he is close
to his own to his own fecal material, a dog can easily catch deadly
parasitical diseases by stepping in or sniffing his own waste.
Please tell your readers and viewers the truth about this abusive race.
Sincerely,
From the Sled Dog Action Coalition, http://www.helpsleddogs.org
On March 2, the Anchorage Daily News revealed that the National Wildlife
Refuge System is one of Aliy Zirkle's sponsors. The Iditarod's musher sponsor
web page had not disclosed this information.
Please tell its director Steven Williams not to use your tax dollars to
promote animal cruelty: contact@...
In the Anchorage Daily News, under the photo of Aliy Zirkle, it said, "
Iditarod veteran and former Yukon Quest champion Aliy Zirkle of Two Rivers
sported a National Wildlife Refuge System temporary tattoo to honor the
system's centennial this year. Zirkle's first work in Alaska was with the
refuge system, one of her sponsors."
(Photo by Erik Hill / Anchorage Daily News)
http://www.adn.com/iditarod/news/story/2705340p-2746512c.html