Welcome, if you are reading this post at some later date using the XSL-FO list archives. Please feel free to join and actively participate on the XSL-FO list. ...
2
AndrewWatt2001@...
Jan 6, 2001 10:12 am
Test - The original message posted to the list didn't arrive in my mail box after 12 hours. Hopefully this will be more successful. Andrew Watt...
3
AndrewWatt2001@...
Jan 6, 2001 8:02 pm
I was wondering if any list member was aware of any browser which is able to display any XSL-FO natively. I am not necessarily seeking any full implementation....
4
AndrewWatt2001@...
Jan 7, 2001 8:37 pm
Since I posted my query about available XSL browsers I have been made aware of the Antenna House XSL Formatter. It is a major step forward, IMHO. Visit the URL...
5
AndrewWatt2001@...
Jan 9, 2001 9:19 am
I have just added the URL for the Antenna House XSL Formatter preview release to the Links page for the group. Please feel free to add other useful XSL-FO...
6
AndrewWatt2001@...
Jan 9, 2001 10:54 am
Take a look at this site which has useful XSL-FO material: http://zvon.org/xxl/xslfoReference/Output/index.html Andrew Watt...
7
AndrewWatt2001@...
Jan 12, 2001 12:33 pm
[I have cross-copied this reply to both the SVG-developers and XSL-FO groups, since it may be of interest in the archives for new members on each group.] ...
8
r_diblasi@...
Jan 12, 2001 11:10 pm
Hello, Just thought I would put my two cents in and say that: Elliotte Rusty Harold has a chapter on line about XSL-FO. He updates the page fairly often. So...
9
Jon Frost
inhorbit@...
Jan 14, 2001 1:43 am
Let's start a poll! Who wants to move this group to Usenet? hehe, No, appears that the majority likes this format well enough to keep it. I could take it or...
10
AndrewWatt2001@...
Jan 14, 2001 10:15 am
Just an invitation to members to follow Edd Dumbill's lead. Please feel free to add useful links to the Links page. Thanks Edd. XMLHack.com is a great...
11
AndrewWatt2001@...
Jan 14, 2001 10:29 am
In a message dated 14/01/01 01:44:12 GMT Standard Time, inhorbit@... ... Hi Jon, I assume you joined from the SVG-Developers group? ... Just for other ...
12
hgazdik@...
Jan 15, 2001 4:08 pm
Hi, I am trying to use the xmlns:fo="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Format" in my stylesheet to transform to HTML pages. Is this possible at this point?? I am...
13
AndrewWatt2001@...
Jan 15, 2001 7:10 pm
In a message dated 15/01/01 18:14:28 GMT Standard Time, hgazdik@... ... Heather, I am not entirely sure what you are asking. I think what you are saying is...
14
r_diblasi@...
Jan 16, 2001 2:54 am
Hello, What the hell.........I have been reading this sentence over and over and I understand each part but I do not understand the whole..... Formatting 1.1.2...
15
AndrewWatt2001@...
Jan 16, 2001 9:22 am
In a message dated 16/01/01 03:01:30 GMT Standard Time, r_diblasi@... writes: Hi Robert, My $0.02 follows below. ... I think the short answer is that...
16
AndrewWatt2001@...
Jan 16, 2001 3:45 pm
This post is largely by way of possibly bringing separate groups of developers together. SVG developers may, in the main, not yet be up to speed on the...
17
AndrewWatt2001@...
Jan 16, 2001 3:54 pm
As some recipients will know I am interested both in how SVG will work with XSL-FO and how SVG will work with XForms. What is causing me severe brain ache...
18
Ken MacLeod
ken@...
Jan 16, 2001 4:15 pm
I have created a "DOM lite" pattern that generally makes using DOM and DOM-like trees a lot simpler in dynamic languages like Perl and Python. Flow objects...
19
AndrewWatt2001@...
Jan 16, 2001 4:54 pm
For those list members who are not already familiar with them please take time to browse round Robin Cover's XSL pages on xml.coverpages.org Other links for...
20
Ken MacLeod
ken@...
Jan 16, 2001 5:25 pm
... I'm reducing the reply to this to just one list because Orchard is still in its infancy, so I'd rather take it one piece at a time for development and then...
21
r_diblasi@...
Jan 16, 2001 6:38 pm
Hello Andrew, Amen..... I believe your "crack" at the concept that was trying to be explained in the XSL spec is much clearer. I still think that the uses of...
22
Chris Ryland
cpr@...
Jan 16, 2001 6:38 pm
Ken-- Can you give those of us who just joined some background here? Cheers! Chris Ryland * Em Software, Inc. * www.emsoftware.com ... From: "Ken MacLeod"...
23
Chris Ryland
cpr@...
Jan 16, 2001 7:08 pm
I think all it's trying to say is that, after tree transformation by XLST, the resulting tree is mostly FO objects (with the possibility of other namespace...
24
Nick Ridout
costempd@...
Jan 16, 2001 7:49 pm
Does this list have a "digest" subscription option? Nick Ridout...
25
Ken MacLeod
ken@...
Jan 16, 2001 8:05 pm
... The project we're implementing this pattern in is called Orchard, it's in the very early stage so it's not ready for the general public, but early adopters...
26
AndrewWatt2001@...
Jan 16, 2001 8:20 pm
In a message dated 16/01/01 19:14:49 GMT Standard Time, r_diblasi@... ... Robert, Due to time constraints I will respond only to this question at...
27
r_diblasi@...
Jan 16, 2001 8:28 pm
Hello Chris, Bingo.... That is what I was looking for...a simple, boiled down, no nonsence, explanation......I hope thats what we are are looking for!! nice...
28
AndrewWatt2001@...
Jan 16, 2001 8:55 pm
Robert & others, The issue addressed in this post may go some way to help some list members understand why they are having problems understanding parts of the...
29
Ken MacLeod
ken@...
Jan 16, 2001 9:11 pm
... A related question, probably much more basic, is: how many people are interested in DOM-level access to FO trees, however simple or not? It may be that...
30
Chris Ryland
cpr@...
Jan 16, 2001 9:23 pm
Andrew-- I share your annoyance/concern. I think the schizophrenia involved with the committee's terminology comes from the days when XSL encompassed both -T...
