I have noticed a very significant drop-off in police presence in
Mount Pleasant and find it extremely disconcerting. Not only do we
appear to have fewer officers than after the infamous shootings just
one month ago, but it seems that we have even fewer than BEFORE. The
last three times I have walked the length of Mount Pleasant Street I
haven't seen a single officer. This is not acceptable, and I'm sure
our PSA meeting on Tuesday will be, well, animated to say the least.
Chief Ramsey, Mayor Williams, Councilman Graham, where are our
police?!!
--- In WardOneDC@yahoogroups.com, Dominic Sale <dominicsale@y...>
wrote:
> > Hi Dominic - I posted this on the safestreets board,
> > but thought you might like to know since it's right
> > at your doorteps again:
> > _______________________
> >
> > Apparently there was a gunshot from a group of people
> > hanging out
> > at the corner of 16th and Irving at about 3:15 this
> > afternoon [fri 11/14]
> >
> > About 15 minutes later an AK-47 or other similar
> > assault rifle was pointed
> > out of a vehicle at people standing in front of the
> > Columbia Heights Metro
> > station on 14th St.
> >
> > All of this while there are 4 PSA's in 4th district
> > with NO officers.
> >
> >
> > __________________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard
> > http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree
Susie,
You can post the file on the yahoo site and then anyone can access it
electronically if they wish.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/WardOneDC/files/
--- In WardOneDC@yahoogroups.com, Susie Cambria <scambria@d...> wrote:
> Last year, DC Action for Children -- as part of our
> election work -- conducted a ballot effort around budget
> priorities for children, youth and their families. "Cast
> your vote for kids," as the initiative is known, encouraged
> residents and others of all ages to select their top three
> budget priorities -- the winners were k-12 education,
> after-school/recreation activities and child care. While
> we did ask respondents to identify the ward in which they
> lived, there were a significant number of "unknowns." 51
> respondents, however, did note that they lived in Ward 1.
> When we analyzed the results, what was significant was the
> age breakdown, not the ward data.
>
> We can send (mail or e-mail) copies of the report to anyone
> who is interested -- it is a whopping 12 pages long
> including cover, etc. Just e-mail me if you want to
> receive a copy -- scambria@d... Or call Ilona Bowie
> at 234-9404 and she can also help you.
>
> Susie Cambria
>
> --
> Susie Cambria, MSW
> Director of Public Policy
> DC Action for Children
> 1616 P St. NW, Suite 420
> Washington, DC 20036
> (202) 234-9404
> (202) 234-9108 fax
What is up with our neighborhood?!? Shots fired /pointing assault
rifles at people / murders ad nauseum.
I feel like I am caught in a game of Grand Theft Auto...
These punks can do whatever they want with no fear of the law. Their
only fear is retribution by their own kind. MPD should treat each of
these murders as if it were a cop that were killed. We would
certainly get some results then.
Is it the sheer numbers of murders that desensitizes everyone to
these crimes? Murder used to be something that was considered
intolerable and every resource was used to find the culprits. When
did this cease to be the norm in this city?
--- In WardOneDC@yahoogroups.com, Dominic Sale <dominicsale@y...>
wrote:
> > Hi Dominic - I posted this on the safestreets board,
> > but thought you might like to know since it's right
> > at your doorteps again:
> > _______________________
> >
> > Apparently there was a gunshot from a group of people
> > hanging out
> > at the corner of 16th and Irving at about 3:15 this
> > afternoon [fri 11/14]
> >
> > About 15 minutes later an AK-47 or other similar
> > assault rifle was pointed
> > out of a vehicle at people standing in front of the
> > Columbia Heights Metro
> > station on 14th St.
> >
> > All of this while there are 4 PSA's in 4th district
> > with NO officers.
> >
> >
> > __________________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard
> > http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree
How does one
know that there are four PSA’s in the 4th
District without cops?
And um, why
would this be?
-----Original Message----- From: Dominic Sale
[mailto:dominicsale@...] Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003
4:07 PM To: wardonedc@yahoogroups.com Subject: [WardOneDC] Fwd: Mt
Pleasant gunshots/assault weapons/low MPD staffing
> Hi Dominic - I posted this on the safestreets
board, > but thought you might like to know since it's
right > at your doorteps again: > _______________________ > > Apparently there was a gunshot from a group
of people > hanging out > at the corner of 16th and Irving at about
3:15 this > afternoon [fri 11/14] > > About 15 minutes later an AK-47 or other
similar > assault rifle was pointed > out of a vehicle at people standing in front
of the > Columbia Heights Metro > station on 14th St. > > All of this while there are 4 PSA's in 4th
district > with NO officers. > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail
AddressGuard > http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree
To unsubscribe from this
group, send an email to: WardOneDC-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Hi Dominic - I posted this on the safestreets board,
> but thought you might like to know since it's right
> at your doorteps again:
> _______________________
>
> Apparently there was a gunshot from a group of people
> hanging out
> at the corner of 16th and Irving at about 3:15 this
> afternoon [fri 11/14]
>
> About 15 minutes later an AK-47 or other similar
> assault rifle was pointed
> out of a vehicle at people standing in front of the
> Columbia Heights Metro
> station on 14th St.
>
> All of this while there are 4 PSA's in 4th district
> with NO officers.
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard
> http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree
How do we get Judge Winfeild OUT and get Judge Joe Brown (or Judge
Judy) into that seat????!!!
--- In WardOneDC@yahoogroups.com, ANC1C01@a... wrote:
> I guess I was wrong -- the other case was a few months ago, not a
couple of years ago. Thanks for forwarding the news report. - Alan
>
> In a message dated 11/11/2003 3:50:37 PM Eastern Standard Time,
jamie@t... writes:
>
> >
> > Argh. What's the point of worrying about whether or not our police
> > officers actually arrest anyone for committing crimes, when they
> > aren't going to go to jail anyway. Since we basically don't have
any
> > law enforcement in this city, what's the smart thing to do? Arm
> > ourselves to the teeth in anticipation of the impending
apocalypse?
> > Just kidding -- but you'd think that at the very least they could
be
> > trying to err on the side of TOUGH rather than EASY when the whole
> > city is freaking out about crime.
> >
> > Just for fun I searched the internet on Judge Winfield's name.
Guess
> > this isn't her first time letting them off light:
> >
> > http://www.2ndamendment.com/Miscellaneous/News/20030709-6.htm
> >
> > On the night of March 25, a criminal named Bernard Johnson did his
> > best to kill D.C. Police Detective Anthony McGee. Then, on June
4, a
> > judge named Susan Winfield did her best to avoid punishing
Johnson for
> > his attack.
> > ...
> > Thanks to the remarkable generosity of D.C. Superior Court Judge
> > Winfield, Johnson will serve only two years in prison for
shooting a
> > cop. It's far less time than it will take McGee to recover fully
from
> > his wounds.
> >
> > -- Jamie
> >
> > Tuesday, November 11, 2003, 11:41:10 AM, you wrote:
> >
> > CEM> Hmmm....It sounds like this judge needs to be REMOVED from
the bench.
> >
> > CEM> What do you all think?
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > WardOneDC-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
Dear Community members:
Please attend the Mayor Anthony William's Citizen Summit III this Saturday
November 15th at the New Convention Center! If you have not yet registered
please do so by going to www.citizensummit.dc.gov or by calling toll free
1-800-990-9809.
Over the past four years, Mayor Williams has engaged more than 10,000
residents in this unique planning process known as Neighborhood Action.
Citizen Summit III gives residents the opportunity to provide valuable input
on the real challenges facing the District, and make real choices as
outlined in the Participant Guide
<http://citizensummit.dc.gov/frames/partGuide.shtm>:
<http://citizensummit.dc.gov/frames/partGuide.shtm>
Citizen's ideas from the summit will also influence the District's Citywide
Strategic Plan as well as the 20-year Comprehensive plan. As in past years,
the daylong Citizen Summit - the largest ongoing town hall meeting in the
United States - will influence the District's annual spending priorities and
legislative initiatives. This is an opportunity to have a direct impact on
the goals and priorities of our city.
As with the first two Citizen Summits, this summit will combine face-to-face
discussion with computer technology to ensure that every voice is heard.
Summit participants will be seated at tables of 10-12 with a trained
facilitator to help guide the discussion. A laptop computer at each table,
as well as one hand-held polling keypad per participant, will allow
residents to share their input with other summit participants.
All those who reside in Washington DC ages 13 and up, are invited to attend.
Translation services in Spanish, Cantonese, Korean, Mandarin and Vietnamese
will be available. For more information, please check our Citizen Summit III
website <http://citizensummit.dc.gov/main.shtm> or contact (202) 727-2822.
Citizen Summit III will take place Saturday November 15th, 2003 at the New
Washington Convention Center Exhibit Hall A, 801 Mount Vernon Place NW.
Please use the Metro, the new Convention Center is located at the Mt. Vernon
Square/Convention center Metro Stop on the Yellow/Green Lines.
All the best,
Desi
Desi Deschaine
Community Outreach Coordinator
Executive Office of the Mayor
1350 Pennsylvania Ave. NW Suite 211
Washington, DC 20004
(202)442-8150
I cannot stress enough how important it is for Ward 1 to be well-
represented this Saturday at the Mayor's Citizen Summit. Attendance
numbers will be a strong factor in how the Mayor decides to
distribute the city's limited budget, so let's fill more than our
share of those chairs.
Signing up online is easy at:
http://citizensummit.dc.gov/register/register.asp?
contentType=participant
I hope to see you there.
Dominic
Dear Community members:
Please attend the Mayor Anthony William's Citizen Summit III this
Saturday
November 15th at the New Convention Center! If you have not yet
registered
please do so by going to www.citizensummit.dc.gov or by calling toll
free
1-800-990-9809.
Over the past four years, Mayor Williams has engaged more than 10,000
residents in this unique planning process known as Neighborhood
Action.
Citizen Summit III gives residents the opportunity to provide
valuable input
on the real challenges facing the District, and make real choices as
outlined in the Participant Guide
<http://citizensummit.dc.gov/frames/partGuide.shtm>:
<http://citizensummit.dc.gov/frames/partGuide.shtm>
Citizen's ideas from the summit will also influence the District's
Citywide
Strategic Plan as well as the 20-year Comprehensive plan. As in past
years,
the daylong Citizen Summit - the largest ongoing town hall meeting in
the
United States - will influence the District's annual spending
priorities and
legislative initiatives. This is an opportunity to have a direct
impact on
the goals and priorities of our city.
As with the first two Citizen Summits, this summit will combine face-
to-face
discussion with computer technology to ensure that every voice is
heard.
Summit participants will be seated at tables of 10-12 with a trained
facilitator to help guide the discussion. A laptop computer at each
table,
as well as one hand-held polling keypad per participant, will allow
residents to share their input with other summit participants.
All those who reside in Washington DC ages 13 and up, are invited to
attend.
Translation services in Spanish, Cantonese, Korean, Mandarin and
Vietnamese
will be available. For more information, please check our Citizen
Summit III
website <http://citizensummit.dc.gov/main.shtm> or contact (202) 727-
2822.
Citizen Summit III will take place Saturday November 15th, 2003 at
the New
Washington Convention Center Exhibit Hall A, 801 Mount Vernon Place
NW.
Please use the Metro, the new Convention Center is located at the Mt.
Vernon
Square/Convention center Metro Stop on the Yellow/Green Lines.
All the best,
Desi
Desi Deschaine
Community Outreach Coordinator
Executive Office of the Mayor
1350 Pennsylvania Ave. NW Suite 211
Washington, DC 20004
(202)442-8150
I would like very much to have a copy of this report.
Dorothy Marschak
President, CHIME
1789 Lanier Place NW#3
Washington, DC 20009
-----Original Message-----
From: Susie Cambria [mailto:scambria@...]
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 8:15 AM
To: WardOneDC@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [WardOneDC] More on Ward One Priorities
Last year, DC Action for Children -- as part of our
election work -- conducted a ballot effort around budget priorities for
children, youth and their families. "Cast your vote for kids," as the
initiative is known, encouraged residents and others of all ages to
select their top three budget priorities -- the winners were k-12
education, after-school/recreation activities and child care. While we
did ask respondents to identify the ward in which they lived, there were
a significant number of "unknowns." 51 respondents, however, did note
that they lived in Ward 1. When we analyzed the results, what was
significant was the age breakdown, not the ward data.
We can send (mail or e-mail) copies of the report to anyone
who is interested -- it is a whopping 12 pages long
including cover, etc. Just e-mail me if you want to
receive a copy -- scambria@.... Or call Ilona Bowie
at 234-9404 and she can also help you.
Susie Cambria
--
Susie Cambria, MSW
Director of Public Policy
DC Action for Children
1616 P St. NW, Suite 420
Washington, DC 20036
(202) 234-9404
(202) 234-9108 fax
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
WardOneDC-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Last year, DC Action for Children -- as part of our
election work -- conducted a ballot effort around budget
priorities for children, youth and their families. "Cast
your vote for kids," as the initiative is known, encouraged
residents and others of all ages to select their top three
budget priorities -- the winners were k-12 education,
after-school/recreation activities and child care. While
we did ask respondents to identify the ward in which they
lived, there were a significant number of "unknowns." 51
respondents, however, did note that they lived in Ward 1.
When we analyzed the results, what was significant was the
age breakdown, not the ward data.
We can send (mail or e-mail) copies of the report to anyone
who is interested -- it is a whopping 12 pages long
including cover, etc. Just e-mail me if you want to
receive a copy -- scambria@.... Or call Ilona Bowie
at 234-9404 and she can also help you.
Susie Cambria
--
Susie Cambria, MSW
Director of Public Policy
DC Action for Children
1616 P St. NW, Suite 420
Washington, DC 20036
(202) 234-9404
(202) 234-9108 fax
I guess I was wrong -- the other case was a few months ago, not a couple of
years ago. Thanks for forwarding the news report. - Alan
In a message dated 11/11/2003 3:50:37 PM Eastern Standard Time,
jamie@... writes:
>
> Argh. What's the point of worrying about whether or not our police
> officers actually arrest anyone for committing crimes, when they
> aren't going to go to jail anyway. Since we basically don't have any
> law enforcement in this city, what's the smart thing to do? Arm
> ourselves to the teeth in anticipation of the impending apocalypse?
> Just kidding -- but you'd think that at the very least they could be
> trying to err on the side of TOUGH rather than EASY when the whole
> city is freaking out about crime.
>
> Just for fun I searched the internet on Judge Winfield's name. Guess
> this isn't her first time letting them off light:
>
> http://www.2ndamendment.com/Miscellaneous/News/20030709-6.htm
>
> On the night of March 25, a criminal named Bernard Johnson did his
> best to kill D.C. Police Detective Anthony McGee. Then, on June 4, a
> judge named Susan Winfield did her best to avoid punishing Johnson for
> his attack.
> ...
> Thanks to the remarkable generosity of D.C. Superior Court Judge
> Winfield, Johnson will serve only two years in prison for shooting a
> cop. It's far less time than it will take McGee to recover fully from
> his wounds.
>
> -- Jamie
>
> Tuesday, November 11, 2003, 11:41:10 AM, you wrote:
>
> CEM> Hmmm....It sounds like this judge needs to be REMOVED from the bench.
>
> CEM> What do you all think?
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> WardOneDC-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
>
I encourage all of you, especially those in leadership positions elsewhere in
Ward One or Third District, to call Presiding Judge Kramer's chambers to express
your disgust and frustration. She heads the Criminal Division of Superior Court
and in effect is Judge Winfield's supervisor. Her chambers number is 879-1286.
She's out of town until Thursday (I learned by calling myself), but I left a
message with her (very polite) law clerk.
Judge Kramer has a reputation for actually caring what neighborhoods think about
the Superior Court and its judges, so I'm hoping this might have some chastening
effect on Judge Winfield, even if it can't change what she's done for this
particular defendant.
By the way, I can't confirm this is true but I'm also told by another
knowledgeable source that Judge Winfield a couple of years ago sentenced a
defendant to 5 years for a felony -- but tacked on only an additional 2 years
for the attempted murder of the police officer who actually caught the guy.
Cases like these make you wonder why the police bother at all.
Alan Roth
Argh. What's the point of worrying about whether or not our police
officers actually arrest anyone for committing crimes, when they
aren't going to go to jail anyway. Since we basically don't have any
law enforcement in this city, what's the smart thing to do? Arm
ourselves to the teeth in anticipation of the impending apocalypse?
Just kidding -- but you'd think that at the very least they could be
trying to err on the side of TOUGH rather than EASY when the whole
city is freaking out about crime.
Just for fun I searched the internet on Judge Winfield's name. Guess
this isn't her first time letting them off light:
http://www.2ndamendment.com/Miscellaneous/News/20030709-6.htm
On the night of March 25, a criminal named Bernard Johnson did his
best to kill D.C. Police Detective Anthony McGee. Then, on June 4, a
judge named Susan Winfield did her best to avoid punishing Johnson for
his attack.
...
Thanks to the remarkable generosity of D.C. Superior Court Judge
Winfield, Johnson will serve only two years in prison for shooting a
cop. It's far less time than it will take McGee to recover fully from
his wounds.
-- Jamie
Tuesday, November 11, 2003, 11:41:10 AM, you wrote:
CEM> Hmmm....It sounds like this judge needs to be REMOVED from the bench.
CEM> What do you all think?
I wholeheartedly concur. This is a great plan. Everyone from Jim
Graham to Mr. Altman to Mayor Williams deserve BIG praise for the The
Heights Plan. From the sculptured lawn to the custom bus stops to
the kids' fountains, I think it is really cool. excellent work.
Everybody, including me, would like to see 'this instead of that' and
try to change stuff. But, I can tell a huge amount of creative
thought, care, concern, and many, many hours went into this plan.
good job. Please let me know where I need to be with my shovel to
make this thing a reality.
Chad Robbins
--- In WardOneDC@yahoogroups.com, "mwhewett" <mwhewett@y...> wrote:
> http://taskforce.columbiaheights.com/ColHts-ExecSum-Oct2003.pdf
I agree emphatically with Rich. CRIME is still the issue that
plagues this area more than any. I would venture, however, that it is
crime generally, not just gangs, that is a big problem.
Personally, I have absolutely no gripe with police. My street is
relatively safe. As a young man, I am not targeted as often by
criminals as a 'victim.' And, I have had the pleasure of meeting
some officers in the line of duty who made me feel proud to live here.
But, anecdotally I hear all the noise from other ListServes, stories
from freinds/neighbors, and occassionally witness police exhibiting
highly unprofessional behavior in public (though they are
rarely 'seen' in the city).
Sadly, the MPD/Mayor/Council do not understand the gravity of the
situation, as citizens see it. It is apparent that there are some
SYSTEMIC problems in the police force -- just read the example of the
man who was mugged and the police did not go try to find the
criminals even though the victim told the police the exact location
to which the criminals fled [Columbia Heights ListServe 11/11/03].
This is just SHODDY police work. No one can deny it. But, unlike
other professions, Police work is serious. You are dealing with
peoples lives, their families, their neighbors. Everything you do,
or fail to do, counts. I feel there are some awesome officers out
there, but with so many anecdotal situations like the aforementioned
that come up every week, one begin to question how the system is
operating.
But, if a citizenry concedes in unison that it does indeed sense a
systemic problem, where does a community begin to address the
systematic police problem?
I have complained to an official that Ramsey makes no attempt
whatever to speak out or calm or work in any public way to address
citizen concerns. I understand he is not in Public Relations. But,
then again, he is. He must answer to the literal cries for help that
have gone out over the past year.
Sadly, even Ramsey's bosses and those that assist our Mayor don't
realize the extent of the problem. I am providing below an exerpt of
an interview with the Mayor's assistant about attracting 100,000 new
residents to the district. NOTICE how this, an administrator to the
Mayor, sees the issue of crime:
"...[As for crime,] it's obviously a concern. Everybody is focused on
that. The mayor is, and the police chief is. But it hasn't come up as
a factor that's deterring people" [from moving into the city].
Who is this gentleman kidding?? I can count on my fingers how many
people will not come into Columbia Heights because they feel this
area is so unsafe. There is a perception out there about how raw
this city in certain areas. And although we all know crime is not
what our colleaques in Fairfax like to dramatize it as, CRIME IS VERY
MUCH AN ISSUE THAT IS CAUSING PEOPLE TO TURN AWAY FROM OUR CITY. And
yet, we have officials who say it's 'not really a factor that is
deterring people...'
I propose two things:
1) begin enlisting officials to assist us in making the MPD more
transparent (how many officers, what kind of training, where do they
live, how many arrests per day, what are the minimum qualifications,
what is protocol in a still unfolding mugging, what is the protocol
in a shooting, what is the protocol for witnesses, where - and in
what form - should citizens address concerns ( is there a form to
file a complaint? )
2) have public officials if they believe there are problems. We have
never heard from the Mayor or Ramsey or other administration
officials whether they believe there is any kind of problem. When
citizens ask the question, as we have in the past, officials should
respond. Then, at least, we will know that [as an example] that
hypothetically Ramsey has told us 'no, there is no problem. crime is
down 8400% percent and officers are trained to national standards and
can be dismissed for cause according to such and such criteria.'
At least then we can begin a dialoque with the city. If they
continue to ignore, or leave unanswered, questions and concerns by
citizens, we at least know that we are being underserved and should
take appropriate steps to find new officials.
3) implement COPS ON THE BEAT (COB). Unlike NYC or Boston, Citizens
and visitors to our city rarely see cops. There are no foot patrols
and citizens never come in contact with these fine men and women.
Perhaps this would preclude the need for PSAs if we could get Patrols
back into the neighborhoods and areas such as Mt. Pleasant, Dupont,
Columbia Hgts. Metro.
I am sorry for my long diatribe, but these are the thoughts --
straight off the top of my head -- that I have been thinking about
for a long time. I am glad that this group has allowed me the
opportunity to help make this fine city an even better place.
Thanks.
Chad
--- In WardOneDC@yahoogroups.com, "rwysocki87" <rwysocki@m...> wrote:
> --- In WardOneDC@yahoogroups.com, "Dominic Sale" <dominicsale@y...>
> wrote:
> > ...and is it being adequately addressed by city leaders?
> >
> > Any opinions out there?
>
> Dominic,
>
> My greatest concern is the growth of gang-related incidents in the
> Mt. Pleasant, Adams Morgan, Columbia Heights triangle. Not only
are
> these incidents growing in number, but also in the level of
> violence. We have teenagers running amok on bicycles armed with
> guns, knives, stones, etc. It's making myself and other MtP
> residents more nervous about walking the streets. Not to mention
> the added friction that could develop between the Hispanic and non-
> Hispanic portions of our community. These incidents are getting
> more and more media attention which sheds a negative light on our
> communities.
>
> I felt that the Resolution adopted by ANC 1D was terrific and
> addressed many of the issues in the MtP community. It was good to
> see the gang-related incidences specifically and clearly
addressed.
> Hopefully, this will result in greater action by the MPD.
>
> Once this issue is properly addressed, I'd like to see more
emphasis
> on economic growth within Ward One. Do you know the status of the
> proposed Target and other shopping that is to be constructed by the
> Tivoli theatre on 14th & Park?
>
> Rich
Hmmm....It sounds like this judge needs to be REMOVED from the bench.
What do you all think?
Charles E. Matiella
Advisory Neighborhood Commissioner
Single Member District 1A08
Chair - Commission 1A
Voice: 202-545-6656
CMatiella@...http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Petworth/http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NCHCA/http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PSA_414_Orange_Hat_Patrol/
"Better Service for a Better Community"
-----Original Message-----
From: Dominic Sale [mailto:dominicsale@...]
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 10:52 AM
To: WardOneDC@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [WardOneDC] Residents Livid as D.C. Burglar Avoids Prison Time
(Washington Post)
Here's a good example of a Ward 1 story...
This armed burglar has been linked to burglaries in multiple
neighborhoods throughout the Ward. Superior Court Judge Winfield has
decided for us all that 90 days in jail was sufficient punishment for
a man who has terrorized at least 29 homes. Residents are up-in-
arms, but where is the outrage from our city leaders on this?
This is just another glaring example of how our criminal justice
system is letting us down on a daily basis. DC to criminals, DC to
criminals, come on in... we're open for business.
By Carol D. Leonnig
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, November 11, 2003; Page B03
A Northwest Washington man tied by police to 29 burglaries has been
sentenced to 90 days in drug treatment by a judge who rejected
prosecutors' calls that he receive significant prison time.
Friday's decision by D.C. Superior Court Judge Susan R. Winfield has
outraged community activists, who say the burglar plagued
neighborhoods for four months until his arrest in July. Police said
he stole thousands of dollars' worth of computers, jewelry and other
items.
Gregory E. Scarborough Jr., 25, whom police dubbed the "Second-Story
Man," confessed to scaling brick walls and breaking into the second
and third stories of apartments and homes throughout the Logan
Circle, Adams Morgan and Columbia Heights neighborhoods, police said.
Authorities said that Scarborough admitted to 11 burglaries and that
evidence tied him to 18 others.
"The Logan Circle community is horrified," said Mary Brown, a member
of that community association's board. "He terrified people
here. . . . To put him back on the street after he conducted this one-
man crime wave doesn't respect the needs of the citizens to have a
safe place to live."
Winfield initially gave Scarborough an 18-year prison term but
suspended that sentence and ordered that he instead undergo a 90-day
drug treatment program and then be released on probation.
Residents have been complaining ever since, with many venting their
frustrations in a series of community e-mails. D.C. Police Chief
Charles H. Ramsey also complained about the sentence's effect on
police morale and crime deterrence during a meeting yesterday with
D.C. Superior Court Chief Judge Rufus G. King III, according to law
enforcement sources.
Winfield said yesterday through a court spokesperson that she could
not comment on a pending case. The judge is scheduled to hear a
report Nov. 21 from court supervision authorities on whether they
have located a spot for Scarborough in the city's overburdened drug
treatment programs....
Read the rest of the story here:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A24332-2003Nov10.html
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
WardOneDC-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Here's a good example of a Ward 1 story...
This armed burglar has been linked to burglaries in multiple
neighborhoods throughout the Ward. Superior Court Judge Winfield has
decided for us all that 90 days in jail was sufficient punishment for
a man who has terrorized at least 29 homes. Residents are up-in-
arms, but where is the outrage from our city leaders on this?
This is just another glaring example of how our criminal justice
system is letting us down on a daily basis. DC to criminals, DC to
criminals, come on in... we're open for business.
By Carol D. Leonnig
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, November 11, 2003; Page B03
A Northwest Washington man tied by police to 29 burglaries has been
sentenced to 90 days in drug treatment by a judge who rejected
prosecutors' calls that he receive significant prison time.
Friday's decision by D.C. Superior Court Judge Susan R. Winfield has
outraged community activists, who say the burglar plagued
neighborhoods for four months until his arrest in July. Police said
he stole thousands of dollars' worth of computers, jewelry and other
items.
Gregory E. Scarborough Jr., 25, whom police dubbed the "Second-Story
Man," confessed to scaling brick walls and breaking into the second
and third stories of apartments and homes throughout the Logan
Circle, Adams Morgan and Columbia Heights neighborhoods, police said.
Authorities said that Scarborough admitted to 11 burglaries and that
evidence tied him to 18 others.
"The Logan Circle community is horrified," said Mary Brown, a member
of that community association's board. "He terrified people
here. . . . To put him back on the street after he conducted this one-
man crime wave doesn't respect the needs of the citizens to have a
safe place to live."
Winfield initially gave Scarborough an 18-year prison term but
suspended that sentence and ordered that he instead undergo a 90-day
drug treatment program and then be released on probation.
Residents have been complaining ever since, with many venting their
frustrations in a series of community e-mails. D.C. Police Chief
Charles H. Ramsey also complained about the sentence's effect on
police morale and crime deterrence during a meeting yesterday with
D.C. Superior Court Chief Judge Rufus G. King III, according to law
enforcement sources.
Winfield said yesterday through a court spokesperson that she could
not comment on a pending case. The judge is scheduled to hear a
report Nov. 21 from court supervision authorities on whether they
have located a spot for Scarborough in the city's overburdened drug
treatment programs....
Read the rest of the story here:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A24332-2003Nov10.html
--- In WardOneDC@yahoogroups.com, "Dominic Sale" <dominicsale@y...>
wrote:
> ...and is it being adequately addressed by city leaders?
>
> Any opinions out there?
Dominic,
My greatest concern is the growth of gang-related incidents in the
Mt. Pleasant, Adams Morgan, Columbia Heights triangle. Not only are
these incidents growing in number, but also in the level of
violence. We have teenagers running amok on bicycles armed with
guns, knives, stones, etc. It's making myself and other MtP
residents more nervous about walking the streets. Not to mention
the added friction that could develop between the Hispanic and non-
Hispanic portions of our community. These incidents are getting
more and more media attention which sheds a negative light on our
communities.
I felt that the Resolution adopted by ANC 1D was terrific and
addressed many of the issues in the MtP community. It was good to
see the gang-related incidences specifically and clearly addressed.
Hopefully, this will result in greater action by the MPD.
Once this issue is properly addressed, I'd like to see more emphasis
on economic growth within Ward One. Do you know the status of the
proposed Target and other shopping that is to be constructed by the
Tivoli theatre on 14th & Park?
Rich
> Any opinions out there?
How about the Unaccountability of monetary responsibilities in the
city....? Where can I get a DC Gov't credit card on which I don't
have to pay the balance, nor, provide justification for spending the
peoples' money?
Explanation on why DC has one of the worst public education systems
in the free world....yet we spend more per capita per student than
any other state?
What does the boxing commissioner do in this town? Why do we pay for
such a position?
Taxi cab commission?
Where is the over site for the DA's office? Why can't we keep violent
criminals off the street? I bet if a councilman/woman was robbed by
sawed off shot gun, there'd be quick changes to some of these lax
laws on the books...
D--- In WardOneDC@yahoogroups.com, "Dominic Sale" <dominicsale@y...>
wrote:
> ...and is it being adequately addressed by city leaders?
>
________________________________________
________________________________________
ATLAS ADVISORY
November 6, 2003
* A Special Nightlife Advocacy Report *
________________________________________
________________________________________
ADAMS MORGAN ADVISORY NEIGHBORHOOD
COMMISSION (ANC) VOTES UNANIMOUSLY
TO URGE THE D.C. COUNCIL TO AMEND
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL (ABC)
LAWS TO EXCLUDE CITIZENS GROUPS
AND INDIVIDUALS FROM THE SO-CALLED
"VOLUNTARY AGREEMENT" PROCESS
Advisory Neighborhood Commission members
representing the Adams Morgan neighborhood
(ANC 1C) voted unanimously last night to urge
the D.C. Council to amend ABC licensing
regulations to effectively limit the negotiation
of so-called "Voluntary Agreements" with
licensee businesses to the affected ANC,
to the exclusion of small and unrepresentative
citizens groups and informal groups of as
few as three or five individuals, as current law
allows. The commissioners plan to make this
proposal to the D.C. Council at public hearings
to discuss proposed new ABC regulations
scheduled for later this month.
In August, the Mount Pleasant neighborhood
ANC (1D) voted unanimously to request that
the ABC Board void the so-called "Voluntary
Agreements" between all eight neighborhood
licensee businesses and a small neighborhood
citizens association which include prohibitions
on music, dancing, entertainment, DJs, and
cover charges. These restrictions also prohibit
licensees from selling their businesses to buyers
intending to continue the operation of an ABC
licensed establishment, as well as restrictions
prohibiting advertising. The restrictions in the
Mount Pleasant neighborhood currently remain
in effect as the ABC Board has so far refused to
review the matter or respond to the ANC resolution.
The resolution adopted by the Adams Morgan
ANC states that "Alcoholic Beverage Control
(ABC) protest procedures under current law
often result in unnecessary or unfair delays,
costs, and expenditures of time by the ABC
Board, ABRA [Alcoholic Beverage Regulation
Administration] staff, [license] applicants, and
protestants." ANC 1C Chair Alan Roth argued
in favor of the resolution, saying that "the current
system is broken" and results in an "undemocratic
process" which is "too cumbersome." Several
representatives of the Kalorama Citizens
Association (KCA) voiced opposition to the
resolution during public testimony prior to the
ANC vote, arguing to preserve the legal standing
of citizens groups in the licensing process and
calling the ANC proposal "a disgrace." Other
residents characterized the current so-called
"Voluntary Agreement" process as "punitive" to
businesses, "unfair" and "not balanced."
Andrew Kline, General Counsel for the
Restaurant Association Metropolitan
Washington (RAMW), pointed out that
so-called "Voluntary Agreements" are not
a licensing requirement, even though the
assumption has grown that businesses must
negotiate such agreements with license
protestants. ABC Board Chair Charles Burger
recently clarified that licensees are not obligated
to sign a so-called "Voluntary Agreement" at a
community forum last month. However, local
nightlife supporters point out that license
opponents hold venue owners hostage, even
before they open for business, by demanding
that they sign restrictive and, in the case of a
new license application, preemptive agreements
through the threat of lengthy delays in licensing
approval or even the refusal to approve or renew
a license.
Community advocates of ABC regulatory reform
have argued that these restrictive agreements
are coercive and exceed statutory law by creating
new regulations with no legislative sanction or
"balancing tests." They further argue that
opponents of nightlife abuse the regulatory
process to infringe on the long-traditional
role of restaurants, bars, taverns, lounges,
and nightclubs in the nation's capital as venues
for music, culture, social expression, and
community life without regard for First Amendment
protections, due process, and equal protection.
For your review and comment. To other ANCs: please feel free to adapt and
adopt for your own neighborhoods. I think many of us are facing the same
problems.
ANC 1D Resolution on Cooperative Enforcement Strategies in Mount Pleasant
(DRAFT and UNADOPTED, for review only)
Whereas, The quality of life and collective sense of security for residents
of Mount Pleasant has been severely hampered by an unnecessarily high threat
of violent crime on our streets; and
Whereas, Rates of several types of violent and non-violent offenses,
including assaults, robberies, harassment, auto thefts, thefts from auto,
destruction and defacement of property, and others, remain consistently
unacceptable; and
Whereas, The frequency, timeliness, quality, level of detail, and
completeness of crime information disseminated to the residents of Mount
Pleasants from the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) hinders the
formulation of collaborative crime abatement strategies between residents
and police; and
Whereas, Crime mitigation plans proposed by MPD at PSA meetings have thus
far proven to be poorly conceived and/or inadequately executed, and have
heretofore yielded insufficient results; and
Whereas, Mount Pleasant residents have expressed concern over the negative
effects of an apparent policy of lenient enforcement as relates to "minor"
crimes and infractions, on the quality of life in our neighborhood, and
Whereas, The District of Columbia's response to recent increases in gang
activity has shown no sign of curbing the proliferation and organization of
gangs in and around Mount Pleasant, which is underscored by a series of
recent fatal gang-related shootings, and
Whereas, Many residents of Mount Pleasant, particularly those residing near
the intersection of Mount Pleasant Street and Park Road NW, have expressed
disappointment and frustration at the District of Columbia's failure to
effectively curb an open-air drug market, and
Whereas, Mayor Anthony Williams recently stated that a tolerance for petty
crime often leads to larger crimes, and
Whereas, Criminal activity and anti-social behavior is in direct conflict
with the spirit of our multi-cultural, tolerant, and progressive community;
a drain on the resources, the economy, and standard of living for all
residents; and an imminent and real threat to the safety and well-being of
our children;
RESOLVED, That ANC 1D requests that the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD)
provide a permanent resource for taking minutes, facilitating, and
monitoring the progress of each PSA meeting, and that MPD present a written
report at each PSA meeting on progress made on each active strategic action
plan, and
Resolved, That ANC 1D requests that MPD provide weekly electronic reports of
all call and arrest activity and provide detailed electronic reports of all
violent crimes committed in PSA 410 (future PSA 301) no more than 24 hours
after they occur, and that MPD provide the ANC with daily roll call figures,
including the number of Spanish-speaking officers on each shift, and
Resolved, That, starting on December 1, 2003, ANC 1D calls on the government
of the District of Columbia to implement a policy of consistent and strict
enforcement of offenses in Mount Pleasant not apparently previously enforced
in an adequate manner. Such offenses will include, but will not necessarily
be limited to: assaults of all types, threats to do bodily harm, disorderly
conduct, destroying or defacing public or private property, throwing stones
or other missiles, unlawful assembly; profane and other indecent language,
lewd, indecent, or obscene acts, cruelty to animals, public intoxication,
possession of open containers of alcohol, prostitution, nuisance properties,
drug-related nuisances, littering, illegal dumping, aggressive panhandling,
truancy, violations of curfew, unlawful entry on property, abandoned or
junked vehicles, double parking, and speeding. The time between the receipt
of this resolution and full implementation shall serve as a test and
education period, during which less-serious violations will result in
issuance of a warning in lieu of legal summons and/or arrest. All violent
offenses and other serious property offenses shall continue to be strictly
enforced and prosecuted to the fullest extent provided by the law, and
without issuance of warning, and
Resolved, That ANC 1D reiterates its commitment to its position that
officers serving in the Mount Pleasant neighborhood be trained in respectful
and appropriate interaction with persons of limited English proficiency,
minimizing conflict and friction between the police and non-native-born
persons in the neighborhood, and that it will recommend the immediate
removal of any officer or agent of the Metropolitan Police Department who is
proven to have physically or verbally abused any resident of or visitor to
the Mount Pleasant neighborhood.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additional information from DC Code, for your information (not part of the
resolution):
1.. CHAPTER 28. ROBBERY.
2.. § 22-401. Assault with intent to kill, rob, or poison, or to commit
first degree sexual abuse, second degree sexual abuse or child sexual abuse.
§ 22-402. Assault with intent to commit mayhem or with dangerous weapon.
§ 22-403. Assault with intent to commit any other offense.
§ 22-404. Assault or threatened assault in a menacing manner; stalking.
§ 22-404.01. Aggravated assault.
§ 22-405. Assault on member of police force, campus or university
special police, or fire department.
3.. § 22-407. Threats to do bodily harm.
4.. § 22-1321. Disorderly conduct.
5.. § 22-3312.01. Defacing public or private property.
6.. § 22-1309. Throwing stones or other missiles.
7.. § 22-1307. Unlawful assembly; profane and indecent language.
8.. § 22-1312. Lewd, indecent, or obscene acts.
9.. CHAPTER 10. CRUELTY TO ANIMALS.
10.. § 25-1001. Drinking of alcoholic beverage in public place
prohibited; intoxication prohibited.
11.. § 25-1001. Drinking of alcoholic beverage in public place
prohibited; intoxication prohibited.
12.. CHAPTER 27. PROSTITUTION; PANDERING.
13.. CHAPTER 31A. ABATEMENT OF NUISANCE PROPERTY
14.. CHAPTER 31. DRUG-RELATED NUISANCE ABATEMENT.
15.. CHAPTER 8. LITTER CONTROL ADMINISTRATION.
16.. CHAPTER 9. ILLEGAL DUMPING ENFORCEMENT.
17.. CHAPTER 23. PANHANDLING.
18.. § 38-251. Authority of police over truant child.
19.. § 2-1543. Curfew authority; defenses; enforcement and penalties.
20.. § 22-3302. Unlawful entry on property.
21.. § 50-2403. Junk vehicles; nuisances.
22.. § 50-2201.04. Speeding and reckless driving.
Nice idea, Dominic. This will be a good spot to vet critical issues
and generate discussion, which will be helpful for a slow decision-
maker like myself.
Also, it'll be a fresh start - maybe I'll be able to keep up with the
emails this time (unlike the 7 other yahoogroups I belong to).
Thank you for including me.