Haribol. This dream stuff verifiesmy position completely about the
ludicrous "when I order" stuff it uses to always deny a devotee. So
now we have a devotee, nice enough person (at least I dont think he
has raped any young boys lately), and his dream is being considered
widely. Now I ask you this very important question:

Why his dream and not mine?

Is there a different "class" of devotees, some are valid and some are
not? If a devotee is following SrilaPrabhupada's instructions, and
receives further instruction post-samadhi, are not all dreams of
equal caliber, to be given equal consideration? Im being a little
facetious here, but serious as a heart attack as well. I described a
dream (VC 7144) in which Srila Prabhupada gives instruction that
could be considered controversial, but no less controversial than
this Amoghalila das dreamscape.

I write this to show those who will NEVER accept any initiator
spiritual master descending from Srila Prabhupada, on the strength
that they did not have evidence that an "order" was given. Do not
interfere, that is all. You dont have to believe anyone, but it is
very suicidal to get in the way of a relationship you have no privvy
to. No one can defeat Amoghalila's dream, nor can anyone defeat mine
either. And if orders are given to a disciple from Guru via an
approved process, approved by guru, by sadhu, and by shastra, then to
decry such a person with lack of any valid philosophical or personal
point that can be proven to be apostacetic, this is sure spiritual
suicide.

So, when are we gonna discuss my dream, especially where Srila
Prabhupada clearly tells me that I not only have the right to ignore
ISKCON if the society is not following Srila Prabhupada, but to
ignore ISKCON is a bonafide DUTY. I am not required to follow
anybody to hell, and he said this while he was still physically
present.

Hare Krsna, ys, mahaksadasa