Larry, In my studies I frequently came across the idea that Papias frowned on Mark, because his order didn' t match the Johannine order. As I recall it was...
I've doing some reading in and about Papias of late and have a question. J. B. Lightfoot and Eduard Schweizer (not sure on the latter) have both explained the...
Charles< The definite article does not appear in the Greek before either usage of satanas in Mk 3:23, but it does appear before the usage of satanas in 3:26. ...
I'm a bit confused. I read Mark 3:23-27 in both English and Greek and see no reference to both A satan and Satan. The text seems to simply say Satan, without...
I'm reading through H.A. Kelly's _Satan: A Biography_ and I note with interest that when he comes to discussing Mk. 3:23-27, where Jesus speaks both of a satan...
... John, Again your conclusion is based on a misunderstanding. Perhaps my wording was not clear enough. I meant "... the "Double Tradition" in this scenario...
863
Maluflen@...
Jul 19, 2007 9:07 pm
Ron wrote: <<Suppose Mark was not extant, and we tried to reconstruct the source behind Matthew and Luke.>> ? Might we not however, on the proposed scenario,...
Dear Ron: I have to commend you for >at least trying< to contemplate a world without the Gospel of Mark in which Matthew and Luke composed their canonical ...
John and Mark, Thanks for your replies, but you both appear to have missed my point. ... Yes. ... Eric does something different, for he posits a scenario in...
... [snip] By definition QED the DT is material common to MT & LK not found in MK. So parts of Mark . . . is contrary to the definition. John John N. Lupia,...
In rereading parts of the introduction to Fleddermann's "Q: A Reconstruction and Commentary", I'm reminded of the oddity of a basic assumption made (but rarely...
To: Synoptic On: Son of Man From: Bruce The T & T Clark catalog, besides offering possibilities of purchasing $130 books for $20, also lists some intriguing...
To: Synoptic In Response To: Mark Matson On: Ascripture From: Bruce A pleasure to see Mark Matson's name once again, among those posting to Synoptic. May that...
To: Synoptic In Response and Farewell to: Kym Smith On: Johannine Solution From: Bruce I think I have said enough by now to indicate why I did not care to...
Bruce, I would like to have completed my response to your former post but I had better keep up with your current rather than have you running too far ahead....
Thanks for the tip on reply to the group, Bruce. I like your modern parallels. I would, however, choose The Stratemeyer Syndicate as a relatively modern...
To: Synoptic In Response To: Dennis Dean Carpenter On: 2Pt Etc [nominal heading: ascripture] From: Bruce DENNIS: Can one have any confidence, historically, in...
To: Synoptic Cc: WSW; Al Cohen On: Ascripture Etc From: Bruce I have received a private communication to the following effect: "I have enjoyed your suggestion...
Can one have any confidence, historically, in the "authority" of any of the Christian canon (or for that matter, the Tanakh), inasmuch as the books being...
To: Synoptic On: School of James From: Bruce Seriously (for a moment), the sense I get from what seems to me to be the most judicious scholarly opinion is that...
To: Synoptic On: Ascripture From: Bruce ascripture < ascribe; ascription [a text claiming authority on the basis of its ascription to a given author, but in...
... I had the same question as Lance as to whether asripture was a composite noun from a + scripture or a derived noun along the lines of ascribe =>...
To: Synoptic Especially: Lance On: Ascripture From: Bruce LANCE: I am saying that to call 2 Peter 'ascripture' would be interpreted to mean it is "free or...
Lance, That was more or less the whole idea. An ascriptive text is not an authorial text, and lacks whatever authority the claimed authorship would have ...
... it was ... persons, ... churches. And ... to Peter, ... Twelve. ... they are not ... a ... going on with ... feeling. Why ... ascription be ... adjective,...
To: Synoptic On: Ascription From: Bruce Speaking of 2Pt, easily the least enthusiastically included of the eventually canonical NT writings, the situation...
To: Synoptic In Response To: Kym Smith From: Bruce KYM: There were certainly 'contentions in the early churches' but that is something quite different from...
Bruce, so much for a little at a time! It will take me two or three days to get to the rest so you will need to be patient. <<<BRUCE: This is dismissive; some...
To: Synoptic In Response To: Kym Smith On: The Johannine Solution From: Bruce I have before me all three of Kym's responses (all of 22 May; here distinguished...
Bruce, here is the third and final part of my response. Thankyou for allowing me to do so. <<<As for the scenario before us, it explains too much, too easily....
