Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
Synoptic · Synoptic-L
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Hear how Yahoo! Groups has changed the lives of others. Take me there.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 695 - 724 of 2415   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
695
To: Synoptic In Response To: Tim Lewis On: Henry Owen From: Bruce There was a question earlier about the book by Henry Owen, familiar to all as one of the...
E Bruce Brooks
ebrucebrooks
Offline Send Email
Aug 10, 2006
10:16 am
696
In a message dated 8/10/2006 6:16:44 AM Eastern Daylight Time, ... Probably a bit early on all four counts, especially Luke. But he has the right idea. Leonard...
Maluflen@...
Send Email
Aug 10, 2006
12:36 pm
697
I was recently asked what commentaries on Luke exist written from the perspective of the Farrer theory. I could only think of Drury, and of Goulder. Are there...
Tim Lewis
tlewistlewis
Offline Send Email
Aug 20, 2006
9:22 am
698
... From: Tim Lewis To: synoptic@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, August 20, 2006 4:58 AM Subject: [Synoptic-L] Luke commentaries based on Farrer theory I was...
Ken Olson
kaolson101
Offline Send Email
Aug 20, 2006
12:39 pm
699
... There's also W. R. F. Browning, The Gospel According to Saint Luke: A Commentary (New York: Collier Books, 1962). At 160 pp., not a full-scale critical...
Ken Olson
kaolson101
Offline Send Email
Aug 20, 2006
3:30 pm
700
In: "Mark and Q: A Study of the Overlap Texts" (Leuven, 1995), H.T.Fleddermann investigates all the texts in which there is overlap between Mark and 'Q'. He...
Ron Price
ron18price
Offline Send Email
Sep 7, 2006
9:22 am
701
Ron Price wrote: Thus Fleddermann's finding that Mark is everywhere secondary to Q should be viewed with suspicion. There has to be something wrong here....
gentile_dave@...
gentdave1
Offline Send Email
Sep 7, 2006
5:31 pm
702
... Dave, But there is no textual evidence for such a 'proto-Mark', nor is it attested by early Christians. Thus proto-Mark, like Q, is hypothetical and ...
Ron Price
ron18price
Offline Send Email
Sep 8, 2006
11:05 am
703
Ron Price writes: But there is no textual evidence for such a 'proto-Mark', nor is it attested by early Christians. Thus proto-Mark, like Q, is hypothetical...
gentile_dave@...
gentdave1
Offline Send Email
Sep 8, 2006
3:28 pm
704
This is an idea that came up in discussion with Bruce Brooks and Tim Lewis on another list. Luke's "Q" section seems to be dependent on Matthew. Mark Goodacre...
gentile_dave@...
gentdave1
Offline Send Email
Sep 8, 2006
4:06 pm
705
Hello, This email message is a notification to let you know that a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the Synoptic group. File : /Dave's...
Synoptic@yahoogroups....
Send Email
Sep 8, 2006
4:36 pm
706
... Great! ... sayings source.<< 'Splain why. Is there a rule that one is likely to rearrange a saying source, but not likely to rearrange the order of sayings...
Ken Olson
kaolson101
Offline Send Email
Sep 8, 2006
7:31 pm
707
Dave: This is interesting. I certainly like the observation that much of the "LukeQ" material looks Matthean (though note substantial modifications as in the...
Matson, Mark (Academic)
markmatsona
Offline Send Email
Sep 8, 2006
7:44 pm
708
... sayings source.<< 'Splain why. Is there a rule that one is likely to rearrange a saying source, but not likely to rearrange the order of sayings embedded...
gentile_dave@...
gentdave1
Offline Send Email
Sep 8, 2006
8:20 pm
709
... Dave, But we don't need to propose that "Q" and Mark had the same author, nor that any forgery was involved. All we need to propose is that of the Double ...
Ron Price
ron18price
Offline Send Email
Sep 8, 2006
8:30 pm
710
Mark Matson wrote: This is interesting. I certainly like the observation that much of the "LukeQ" material looks Matthean (though note substantial...
gentile_dave@...
gentdave1
Offline Send Email
Sep 8, 2006
8:30 pm
711
... Dave, In spite of being within the travel narrative, Luke *did* place the text locally in Matthean order. For we have the following rough parallels: Mt...
Ron Price
ron18price
Offline Send Email
Sep 8, 2006
8:31 pm
712
Dave, As to your second question below, the answer is Mk, Mt and Lk. When the three overlap, Mk's order is followed some huge percentage of time (forgot the...
Chuck Jones
chuckjonez
Offline Send Email
Sep 8, 2006
9:37 pm
713
Ron, First of all, I think I would call Mt. 12:22-32 is the pericope in Matthew parallel to Mark 3:22-30, and Luke does use Matthew 12:22-32. Before this Luke...
Dave Gentile
gentdave1
Offline Send Email
Sep 8, 2006
9:57 pm
714
That was Ken's question that I was quoting, (apparently without clarity). But thanks for the answer. Dave Gentile Sr. Systems Engineer/Statistician B.S./M.S....
Dave Gentile
gentdave1
Offline Send Email
Sep 8, 2006
10:01 pm
715
... As to your second question below, the answer is Mk, Mt and Lk. When the three overlap, Mk's order is followed some huge percentage of time (forgot the...
Ken Olson
kaolson101
Offline Send Email
Sep 9, 2006
12:32 am
716
... So you perceive a problem with Luke's "scattering" and back it up with an appeal to the authority of those who accept the 2DH? Let's take a look at what a...
Ken Olson
kaolson101
Offline Send Email
Sep 9, 2006
12:59 am
717
Following Dave's logic here, would it not also be true to say that Luke most likely used not only the LXX OT, but also a hypothetical sayings source containing...
Maluflen@...
Send Email
Sep 9, 2006
7:51 pm
718
... reasoning here that I tried and apparently failed to bring to your attention in my last post. So let me ask a few simple questions in return. Is"...
Dave Gentile
gentdave1
Offline Send Email
Sep 10, 2006
5:33 am
719
Ron, I have to admit, I had not carefully considered what would differentiate my idea from yours. Given that they are both versions of the 3SH, they are going...
Dave Gentile
gentdave1
Offline Send Email
Sep 10, 2006
6:22 am
720
... Dave, I don't think there is a good argument, for these two suppositions seem to me to be essentially incompatible. For in my opinion Mark's liberal ...
Ron Price
ron18price
Offline Send Email
Sep 10, 2006
5:35 pm
721
Ron Price wrote: For in my opinion Mark's liberal treatment of the basically Jewish sayings source is just what would be expected from his sharp criticisms of...
Dave Gentile
gentdave1
Offline Send Email
Sep 10, 2006
7:31 pm
722
snip "We also know that sayings sources existed (Thomas)" snip There was a sayings source (Thomas), but we don't really know that it was any earlier than the...
Dennis Dean Carpenter
ddcanne
Offline Send Email
Sep 11, 2006
1:15 am
723
... Dave, The most prominent is the story of Peter's denial which presents Peter as disloyal, but there are several other passages such as Mk 3:31-35 which ...
Ron Price
ron18price
Offline Send Email
Sep 11, 2006
9:21 am
724
I wrote: Did you have a specific narrative example in mind? And Ron replied: The most prominent is the story of Peter's denial which presents Peter as ...
gentile_dave@...
gentdave1
Offline Send Email
Sep 11, 2006
6:07 pm
Messages 695 - 724 of 2415   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help