BRUCE: For what it may be worth, my own study of the evidence disinclines me to mix Thomas in with the canonical Gospels. I accept the indications that Thomas...
While I agree with Bruce that GTh tells us nothing (directly) about the historical Jesus, I also agree with ... There is a potential irony here, for if...
To: Synoptic Cc: GPG In Response To: Ron Price (quoting Dave Inglis) On: GTh Comparison From: Bruce DAVE: Q theories should take Thomas into account, RON:...
... Bruce, It can be found on the following Web page: http://homepage.virgin.net/ron.price/syno_sQet.html ... Here is a rough guide of the procedure, from...
To: Synoptic Cc: GPG In Response To: Ron Price On: Sayings Source Reconstruction From: Bruce I had asked Ron about the principles of construction for his...
... Bruce, Actually it doesn't work quite like that. We can often only see which of the pair is taken from Mark by observing the context. Thus for instance...
With apologies for cross posting: Does anyone here have access to back issues of the _Expository Times_? I am in need of W. J. P. Boyd's article , '1...
Does anyone have access to Brandon's _ History, Time and Deity_? If so, would you please contact me off list? Yours, Jeffrey -- Jeffrey B. Gibson, D.Phil....
Can anyone help me with information on finding Owen's book? All my searches online are coming up with nothing. Henry Owen, _Observations on the Four Gospels;...
... The National Library of Australia has both online and microfilm versions. Stephen Goranson http://www.duke.edu/~goranson "Jannaeus, His Brother Absalom,...
Can anyone here supply with the context -- i.e., what Funk says both before and after the following statement that appeared in The Fourth R, January-February...
Jeffrey, Having read four of Funk's major Historical Jesus books, I'm finding it hard to believe he said this in any context. I share your interest! Maybe...
With apologies for cross posting. Does anyone here have access to the online editions of JTS and Scottish Journal of Theology? (It's around 100 degrees here in...
To: Synoptic In Response To: Tim Lewis On: Henry Owen From: Bruce There was a question earlier about the book by Henry Owen, familiar to all as one of the...
In a message dated 8/10/2006 6:16:44 AM Eastern Daylight Time, ... Probably a bit early on all four counts, especially Luke. But he has the right idea. Leonard...
Maluflen@...
Aug 10, 2006 12:36 pm
697
I was recently asked what commentaries on Luke exist written from the perspective of the Farrer theory. I could only think of Drury, and of Goulder. Are there...
... From: Tim Lewis To: synoptic@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, August 20, 2006 4:58 AM Subject: [Synoptic-L] Luke commentaries based on Farrer theory I was...
... There's also W. R. F. Browning, The Gospel According to Saint Luke: A Commentary (New York: Collier Books, 1962). At 160 pp., not a full-scale critical...
In: "Mark and Q: A Study of the Overlap Texts" (Leuven, 1995), H.T.Fleddermann investigates all the texts in which there is overlap between Mark and 'Q'. He...
Ron Price wrote: Thus Fleddermann's finding that Mark is everywhere secondary to Q should be viewed with suspicion. There has to be something wrong here....
... Dave, But there is no textual evidence for such a 'proto-Mark', nor is it attested by early Christians. Thus proto-Mark, like Q, is hypothetical and ...
Ron Price writes: But there is no textual evidence for such a 'proto-Mark', nor is it attested by early Christians. Thus proto-Mark, like Q, is hypothetical...
This is an idea that came up in discussion with Bruce Brooks and Tim Lewis on another list. Luke's "Q" section seems to be dependent on Matthew. Mark Goodacre...
Hello, This email message is a notification to let you know that a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the Synoptic group. File : /Dave's...
Synoptic@yahoogroups....
Sep 8, 2006 4:36 pm
706
... Great! ... sayings source.<< 'Splain why. Is there a rule that one is likely to rearrange a saying source, but not likely to rearrange the order of sayings...
Dave: This is interesting. I certainly like the observation that much of the "LukeQ" material looks Matthean (though note substantial modifications as in the...
... sayings source.<< 'Splain why. Is there a rule that one is likely to rearrange a saying source, but not likely to rearrange the order of sayings embedded...
... Dave, But we don't need to propose that "Q" and Mark had the same author, nor that any forgery was involved. All we need to propose is that of the Double ...
... Dave, In spite of being within the travel narrative, Luke *did* place the text locally in Matthean order. For we have the following rough parallels: Mt...