Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
Synoptic · Synoptic-L
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Real people. Real stories. See how Yahoo! Groups impacts members worldwide.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 399 - 428 of 2415   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
399
It has come to my attention that the form of my recent argument may be completely foreign to those trained in biblical studies. (As some terms used by biblical...
Gentile, David
gentdave1
Offline Send Email
Mar 3, 2006
4:43 pm
400
I don't want to say that the following is acceptable methodology, but if my reading of salt in Mark was very far from the truth, what would be the odds that I...
Gentile, David
gentdave1
Offline Send Email
Mar 3, 2006
8:06 pm
401
... I would say that you shouldn't be wasting our time with methodologies you're not willing to defend, and if a methodology is unacceptable, then the odds are...
Bob Schacht
r_schacht
Offline Send Email
Mar 3, 2006
8:37 pm
402
The odds are exactly what I am after. What did Mark most probably mean by what he wrote? That is the "right" answer. If "acceptable" methodology can't produce...
Dave
gentdave1
Offline Send Email
Mar 3, 2006
9:03 pm
403
... Problem is, you haven't demonstrated in any way or form that you even minimally understand what "acceptable" methodology is, let alone (and more...
Jeffrey B. Gibson
jgibson000
Offline Send Email
Mar 3, 2006
9:50 pm
404
Well, at least I'm getting a response... But given the general lack of positive interest, I'll shortly give it a rest in this venue. I'll respond to some...
Gentile, David
gentdave1
Offline Send Email
Mar 3, 2006
11:38 pm
405
First I want to apologize to any who have been annoyed by the excess noise I've made around here recently. I'm intending to be quite for awhile. I have some...
David Gentile
gentdave2
Offline Send Email
Mar 4, 2006
6:40 am
406
... There is no barrier to probability theory here, except in the formulation of a sound basis for it. There is also no need to be patronizing. ... This...
Bob Schacht
r_schacht
Offline Send Email
Mar 4, 2006
7:15 am
407
... Good. Doing your homework is a good way to enhance your ability to "show" and "strengthen." ... Oh baloney. What is your basis for this claim? Bayesian...
Bob Schacht
r_schacht
Offline Send Email
Mar 4, 2006
7:45 am
408
To: Synoptic In Response To: Dave Gentile From: Bruce Dave has been advocating Bayesian probability without on-list response. I have no informed response to...
E Bruce Brooks
ebrucebrooks
Offline Send Email
Mar 4, 2006
8:03 am
409
To: Synoptic In Response To: Bob Schacht On: Bayesian From: Bruce [I see my attempt to respond to the Bayesian issue raised by Dave Gentile was composed and...
E Bruce Brooks
ebrucebrooks
Offline Send Email
Mar 4, 2006
8:09 am
410
Thank you very much for the response. Actually, you do seem informed on the topic. Here is a nice powerpoint presentation of the history. ...
David Gentile
gentdave2
Offline Send Email
Mar 4, 2006
4:47 pm
411
... I mean two different things there. One - "Bayesian" is a very popular term among software vendors whether their product really uses it significantly or...
David Gentile
gentdave2
Offline Send Email
Mar 4, 2006
10:33 pm
412
... Oh, I see. It's YOUR gold standard. Saying that something is the "gold standard" usually means, to most people, that there is consensus agreement about it....
Bob Schacht
r_schacht
Offline Send Email
Mar 5, 2006
12:35 am
413
I want to ask if the synoptic 'problem' is too narrowly defined. I am just reading Hurst's monograph on Hebrews (some preparation for Aberdeen this summer)....
Bob MacDonald
drmacdonald_...
Offline Send Email
Mar 5, 2006
12:42 am
414
Bob Schacht <r_schacht@...> wrote: Oh, I see. It's YOUR gold standard. Saying that something is the "gold standard" usually means, to most people, that there...
David Gentile
gentdave2
Offline Send Email
Mar 5, 2006
11:29 pm
415
Among investigators of the synoptic problem, Kloppenborg downplays the evidence of doublets. But in a more balanced perspective, Schnelle still treats them as...
Ron Price
ron18price
Offline Send Email
Mar 7, 2006
2:26 pm
416
Sorry for cross-posting - I was advised to send this here as well. I've been working on a paper discussing whether Matthew is Jewish or Christian. I can't...
Chris Weimer
cweb255
Offline Send Email
Mar 21, 2006
9:40 pm
417
Hello all. I believe I'm about finished making changes to my webpage for the near future. I've gotten interested in other things. But in its current state in...
Gentile, David
gentdave1
Offline Send Email
Apr 11, 2006
5:23 pm
418
To: Synoptic Cc: Dave Gentile On: Bayesian Salt From: Bruce All that thought and work should not pass without comment, and so I venture to make a comment, if...
E Bruce Brooks
ebrucebrooks
Offline Send Email
Apr 13, 2006
3:39 am
419
... following five points: (1,2), (2,4), (3,6), (4,8), (5,8). Question: which of them is aberrant?<< Bruce, wouldn't the correct depend upon knowing more. Are...
Horace Jeffery Hodges
jefferyhodges@...
Send Email
Apr 13, 2006
3:49 am
420
... Bruce, you're missing the point about Bayesian statistics. The philosophical issue here is: Is "truth" absolute, or is it relative? You take the side of...
Bob Schacht
r_schacht
Offline Send Email
Apr 13, 2006
4:52 am
421
To: Synoptic In Response To: Jeffery Hodges On: Persimmon Paradox From: Bruce JEFFERY: Bruce, wouldn't the correct depend upon knowing more[?] BRUCE: My point...
E Bruce Brooks
ebrucebrooks
Offline Send Email
Apr 13, 2006
5:45 am
422
I'm glad that this nonmathematician 'got it.' Now, I just need to work on my grammar: "Bruce, wouldn't the correct ANSWER depend upon knowing more[?]" And I'm...
Horace Jeffery Hodges
jefferyhodges@...
Send Email
Apr 13, 2006
5:55 am
423
To: Synoptic In Response To: Bob Schacht On: The Persimmon Paradox From: Bruce BOB: Bruce, you're missing the point about Bayesian statistics. The ...
E Bruce Brooks
ebrucebrooks
Offline Send Email
Apr 13, 2006
6:50 am
424
... Well, you flat out declared, after quoting the problematic passage from David's essay, ... [snip] ... But you are not shy about responding "No, it was...
Bob Schacht
r_schacht
Offline Send Email
Apr 13, 2006
7:52 am
425
To: Synoptic In Response To: Bob Schacht On: Truth From: Bruce BOB: But you are not shy about responding "No, it was wrong period. " / You can only declare it...
E Bruce Brooks
ebrucebrooks
Offline Send Email
Apr 13, 2006
8:58 am
426
Thank you very much for the response, and the favorable words. I'd like to respond here to both this post and some issues raised on the subsequent thread. I...
Gentile, David
gentdave1
Offline Send Email
Apr 13, 2006
4:15 pm
427
To: Synoptic Repeated From: WSW On: Seasonal Note (Judas) From: Bruce Judas is hot these days, with one bestseller after another ripping off the presses. I...
E Bruce Brooks
ebrucebrooks
Offline Send Email
Apr 16, 2006
5:24 am
428
... Bruce, I find that your analysis does not sufficiently recognize the creativity of the Markan account, nor the strong desire of its author to denigrate...
Ron Price
ron18price
Offline Send Email
Apr 16, 2006
9:09 am
Messages 399 - 428 of 2415   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help