Does anyone know if there is available online anywhere an abstract for Seung Ai Yang's 1990 University of Chicago Dissertation: “The Original Intention of...
Apologies for cross posting. Does any list member have (or have access to) The Testing of Jesus in Q (Peter Lang, 2007) by C. Michael Robbins? It is not...
To: Synoptic On: Q From: Bruce In a survey some time ago on this list, the reasons which people supplied for believing in Q (rather than in a Mt > Lk...
To: Synoptic Cc: GPG In Response To: Chuck Jones On: Q From: Bruce No, I don't think it's a question of bias. Let me elaborate. CJ: These three passages do...
Bruce, You are asserting that some passages (you will grant 2 at this point) are better explained by Lk and Mt's having independently relied on a third...
Apologies for cross posting, but I'd like to have as many people as possible see the questions and requests I'm posting in this message. I'm revising some...
To: Synoptic Cc: GPG In Further Response To: Chuck Jones On: Q Suggestion From: Bruce Still not quite together here. CJ: I am pleased that you realize you are...
... This topic has been richly discussed in the literature. For example, Mark Goodacre has devoted three chapters to these points in his CASE AGAINST Q. ...
To: Synoptic Cc: GPG In Response To: Chuck Jones On: Q Suggestion From: Bruce There are more interesting things starting to happen on Synoptic, so perhaps it...
To: Synoptic In Response To: Jeffrey Gibson On: Motives of the Devil in Mt/Lk From: Bruce The tendency of scholarship to feed on itself is not necessarily its...
Reading Jeffrey's list raises some interesting points. To what extent does the story expect the reader to attribute psychological motivations to the tempter? ...
David Mealand
D.Mealand@...
May 13, 2008 9:32 am
1083
New book: "Kompendium der Gleichnisse Jesu" Ruben Zimmermann (ed.) with Detlev Dormeyer, Gabi Kern, Annette Merz, Christian Münch and Enno Edzard Popkes ...
... You've noted a very important hidden assumption behind the first four views. But its not, I think, the only one which contributes to the "psychologizing...
To: Synoptic Cc: GPG In Response To: Jeffrey Gibson On: Devil in Mt/Lk From: Bruce EBB (previous, commenting on Jeffrey's five positions): I noted with ...
To: Synoptic Cc: GPG In Response To: Wieland Willker On: A New Study of the Parables From: Bruce Wieland: They write, that they always analyze the oldest...
Bruce wrote: "I have the impression that Chuck is seeing the world as divided into Q and non-Q portions, and that he is trying to construe my position as...
To: Synoptic Reporting: Curious Coincidence From: Bruce I happened to be looking into James D G Dunn, Jesus Remembered (Eerdmans 2003), and was amused to come...
... Chuck et al., It might be worth asking what sort of loose ends are left by 'Q' and 'Mt>Lk' respectively. I suggest that the loose ends associated with 'Q'...
To: Synoptic Cc: GPG In Response To: Ron Price On: Loose Ends [of Synoptic Theories] From: Bruce Ron usefully raises the question of "Loose Ends," which I take...
Ron, Excellent post. I would add that the biggest loose ends created by Mt>Lk have nothing to do with Q issues. They are, literally, the ends of the books....
... My conclusion here, based on the 3ST (although it could equally well have been based on the 2ST), is that Matthew and Luke have each retained parts of the...
Bruce, The correct question is, Why would Lk totally ignore Mt's birth narrative? There is no rewriting because there is no overlapping material. Likewise...
If I might interject, why wouldn't Luke ignore Mt's birth narrative? Luke's prologue serves notice that his is the one that is correct. It implies that the...
To: Synoptic Cc: GPG In Response To: Chuck Jones, Dennis Dean Carpenter On: Luke's Birth Narrative From: Bruce We were discussing Ron Price's point about...
To: Synoptic Cc: GPG In Response To: Ron Price On: Loose Ends From: Bruce Ron had suggested that the best Synoptic theory is the one with the fewest loose...
... Chuck, There is a precedent for an almost complete rewrite in the way Mk 6:1-6a is changed into Lk 4:16-30. Here there is only just enough in common for us...
... Also Luke 7.36-50 and Luke 5.1-11. Cheers Mark -- Mark Goodacre Goodacre@... Associate Professor Duke University Department of Religion Gray Building...
... is ... to ... Another example might be Lk 5.1-11 in relation to Mk 1.16-20. (But I see Mark Goodacre has just suggested one of these as I was typing!). ......
The response of Chuck Jones to Ron Price below is significant, in that it shows how Mk-priority logic governs one's thinking in regard to Luke's use of...
Having problems with message search?
Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.
