In Mk 1:2 par, both Mt and Lk do not have the Malachi quote. Both cite it later at Mt 11:10/Lk 7:27, but not here. Did they both omit it, because it is not...
Last time I looked at this one I remember it looked like an insertion in Mark's text. I think Fledderman makes the argument that the "Q" version is earlier,...
Wieland & Dave, Just a few comments on this rather complex case. Firstly there is no textual evidence for the omission of the Malachi quotation in Mk 1:2. ...
To: Synoptic Cc: GPG In Response To: Dave G / Wieland Willker / Ron Price From: Bruce Partly from another angle, in response to Dave G and (later) to Ron (see...
I note a couple of points about this passage that incline me towards my view. First of all by saying this is an addition to Mark, I mean an addition made after...
To: Synoptic Cc: GPG In Response To: Dave G On: Mk 1:2 From: Bruce DAVE: I note a couple of points about this passage that incline me towards my view. First of...
I'm only going to comment on one point here. I don't have time to look at the specific details of Mark 1:2 at the moment. But I think it is a near certainty...
Thanks to all who contributed to this question. I haven't anything to add. The beginning of Mk poses several, at present, unsolvable questions. I agree with...
To: GPG Cc: WSW; Synoptic, various In Response To: Dave I On: Lk 7:46 From: Bruce Dave asks about the meaning of three words omitted by Bezae in Lk 7:46. This ...
In his "The Case against Q", pp. 165-69, Mark Goodacre argues that if the Minor Agreements were to be accepted as valid evidence that Luke knew Matthew, then...
To: Synoptic Cc: GPG In Response To: Ron Price From: Bruce I feel we are in deja vu country here, but sometimes repetition has its point, especially if nothing...
Bruce wrote: I have separately called for more attention to the question of how Mt uses Mk. There were no replies to my request for previous studies on this....
Maluflen@...
Sep 21, 2009 11:54 pm
2398
To: Synoptic In Response To: Leonard On: Matthew From: Bruce LEONARD: . . .Saint Matthew, who I am sure resents the idea that he was largely a plagiarist . . ....
... It's true that I've made this general case before, but not in exactly this way. In making a measured criticism of a passage in Mark's most important book...
Some of my previous arguments for the synoptic use of a sayings source do not necessarily apply to Luke. So I have now extended and clarified the arguments for...
My dear brother Leonard Matthew does not rest in peace but beholds the glory of Jesus Christ forever. As for Matthew using Mark, huh! Prove it! As far as I am...
Surely one argument for some sort of Q is that of Bussmann, rehashed entertainingly by Casey: ie that the Q material can be seen to fall into two types: one...
I don't know where to begin! First, little or none of Mr.Lupia's post is the official teaching of the Catholic Church and as I understand it not the common...
Charles Schwarz wrote: He [John Lupia] also says "Since all four Gospels were written by the Catholic Church by the original eyewitnesses by the authority of...
... Graham, I'm sure there is some truth in this. However 'degree of verbal agreement' as a criterion is not as useful as one might think. If there is very...
Ron's web page does list some of the problems with some of the theories. There are problems esp over minor agreements on the Q view. There are also problems...
David Mealand
D.Mealand@...
Sep 29, 2009 6:15 pm
2407
... David, You don't spell out the latter problems. If you refer to Luke's treatment of Matthew's birth and resurrection narratives, then my explanation would...
Maurice Casey liberated a much-needed cat among the synoptic pigeons when he set out detailed evidence that an Aramaic source lay behind the 'Woes' ("An ...
Casey's book on Q does indeed offer a number of very valuable insights into the possible development of the tradition prior to its translation into Greek. It...
David Mealand
D.Mealand@...
Oct 26, 2009 11:08 am
2410
"Q as Hypothesis: A Study in Methodology" Francis Watson New Testament Studies (2009), 55:397-415 Abstract Arguments for the Q hypothesis have changed little...
Amen, amen, and amen. It must, and it does. Rev. Chuck JonesAtlanta, Georgia ... From: Wieland Willker <wie@...> Subject: [Synoptic-L] New article on...
... Thanks to Wieland for passing on this information. The argument in the second sentence in the abstract above is probably true (depending on one's...
With apologies for cross posting. It's that time of year again when the Society of Biblical Literature's Annual Meeting is just around the corner (Nov. 21st -...
... I meant I begin to arrange the now traditional (13th annual!) gathering of all those NT and Biblical and Biblically related e-list members (i.e. XTalkers,...
This is the second notice of the 13th annual E-Lister's that will take place at SBL on Saturday, Nov. 21st at 11:30 a.m. the Eisenbrauns Press booth (# 704)...
Having problems with message search?
Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.
