This apparently never arrived...I'll try again...
Given that most of the conference papers are to be found uploaded at:
http://users.ox.ac.uk/~rege0695/papers.htm
(main page: http://users.ox.ac.uk/~rege0695/index.htm)
we could easily discuss here many of the points discussed at the conference.

I've just finished reading Tuckett's "Current State of the Synoptic Problem" and
Foster's "The M-Source: Its History and Demise in Biblical Studies." I'm
currently wondering about the relative age of our respective recontructed
Gospels, i.e. Isn't our recontructed text of Mark later than that for Matthew
and/or Luke? I have yet to see any discussion of this but I'm about to read
Boring's paper ("The 'minor agreements' and their bearing on the synoptic
problem") which hopefully discusses it.

It was Randall Buth's recent post which caught my attention:
"Textual Criticism and Synoptics, the Case of EUQUS"
http://alefandomega.blogspot.com/2008/04/textual-criticism-and-synoptics-case-of\
.html
a slightly shorter version is found at:
http://evangelicaltextualcriticism.blogspot.com/2008/04/textual-criticism-and-sy\
noptics-case-of.html

Tim
http://sourcetheory.blogspot.com/

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]