Skip to search.
Synoptic · Synoptic-L

Group Information

  • Members: 244
  • Category: Bible Studies
  • Founded: Jul 7, 2005
  • Language: English
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Message search is now enhanced, find messages faster. Take it for a spin.
Notice  Upcoming calendar upgrade: Yahoo! Groups calendars are being upgraded to a much improved version. You may not have access to the calendar (for up to 24 hours) when this group is upgraded. We sincerely apologize for this inconvenience.

Home

 

Activity within 7 days:

Description

Synoptic-L is an academic list devoted to scholarly discussion of the Synoptic Gospels. Its purpose is to provide a forum for questions relating to the exegesis of Matthew, Mark and / or Luke, using and analysing the standard critical tools and methods, with a special emphasis on the interrelationships among the Synoptics. Those who would like to apply for subscription should bear in mind that Synoptic-L is an academic list and that contributors are expected to be professional scholars or graduate students who are familiar with the sources, tools and methods used in the critical study and exegesis of the Synoptic Gospels. All subscribers are bound by Synoptic-L Protocol when contributing to the list. For more information, see http://ntgateway.com/synoptic-l.

Most Recent Messages

  (View All)
(Group by Topic)
Advanced
   Start Topic
Re: Laodicenas (was Borg on Chronology)
To: Synoptic In Response To: Mark Matson On: Critical Scholarship From: Bruce Mark recently protested (his word) two of my previous statements. It seems there
Posted - Mon May 28, 2012 12:30 am
E Bruce Brooks
ebrucebrooks
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
Re: THE SON OF MAN
The Aramaic has cebar 'enosh. (I'm not taking the time to use the proper transliteration.) Likewise, "the" LXX has hWS hUIOS ANQRWPOU (without the definite
Posted - Sat May 26, 2012 6:51 pm
arnehalbakken
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
Re: THE SON OF MAN
Ron, The Aramaic merely said 'one like a human being' did it not ? It was the LXX that had the word for word translation huios tou anthropou that was
Posted - Sat May 26, 2012 6:23 pm
Dennis Goffin
dennis_goffin
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
Re: THE SON OF MAN
... Dennis, I find myself in agreement with Telford on this point. Firstly, there is a clear a priori argument in favour of the label "Son of Man" having been
Posted - Sat May 26, 2012 5:18 pm
Ronald Price
ron18price
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
THE SON OF MAN
Reading Telford's book "The Theology of the Gospel of Mark" I find myself agreeing with everything he says in his analysis on pages 50 to 54 except for his
Posted - Sat May 26, 2012 1:08 pm
Dennis Goffin
dennis_goffin
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
Add Synoptic to your personalized My Yahoo! page Add to My Yahoo! XML What's This?

Message History

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2012 27 117 17 11 26
2011 17 35 50 201 129 111 184 66 121 67 73 21
2010 15 61 82 126 24 14 17 10 28 28 23 32
2009 156 150 38 37 183 263 28 39 16 2 21 8
2008 7 1 74 37 67 156 25 44 22 34 71 8
2007 2 4 10 4 30 7 13 11 1 62
2006 11 80 18 44 14 207 13 5 35 13 24 36
2005 124 62 69 39 13
What is Yahoo! Answers?

Yahoo! Answers, a new Yahoo! community, is a question and answer exchange where the world gathers to share what they know...and make each other's day. People can ask questions on any topic, and help others out by answering their questions.

What is Yahoo! Answers?

Yahoo! Answers, a new Yahoo! community, is a question and answer exchange where the world gathers to share what they know...and make each other's day. People can ask questions on any topic, and help others out by answering their questions.

Questions in Society & Culture > Religion & Spirituality

  • Questions are currently unavailable.

Want to help answer other questions? Go to Yahoo! Answers


Copyright © 2010 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines NEW - Help