Review by my friend Mark on a non-post carbon list.
RE:
http://www.metroactive.com/metro/06.24.09/cover-0925.html
What an interesting article, contrasting the hopeful and the
pessimistic. The one thing about the rosy scenario which
bothers me is that it ignores the fact the barbarians are currently
making their easy gains in places like Wall Street, and when that is no
longer possible they will turn to new avenues of easy predatory
exploitation. Historically, it seems that “farmers” are on
the bottom of the social ladder and suffer from hard toil and abuse from
their masters above them, whoever they happen to be. The
transitionists seem to be blind to this fact, so their happy little
communities, which are a substitute for the suburban cul-de-sac of
security and comfort, are probably too optimistic. There will still
be large numbers of unprepared, desperate and angry people who will not
make an easy transition, and the people who have will still be vulnerable
as targets. That’s not stopping me from trying, anyway, but I
don’t want to fool myself about this.
I think that all examples from life are present in the past, and the past
should be examined for previous “transitions.” I doubt that
any of them have been peaceful and idylic. Usually, they result in
social collapse and abandonment, fighting and disease. Maybe
afterwards, after the excess population has died off, then some tiny
little self-sufficient communities might be created, but they still will
be vulnerable to outside attack. Most villages had stockades or
stone walls around them for protection, and this is the other, blindered
side of the transitionist equation (notice how “Sandanista” has spawned
imitative descriptors? “Transitionistas”). You always
get the bad with the good in human behavior.
Given human proclivity to persist in the known rather than accept the
unknown, I believe that coal will be turned to first, heating up the
extraction and consumption until that too is more rapdily exhausted than
expected. Then, well…ta da, Gloom and Doom will reign! I was
thinking about one upcoming niche-jumping possibility in regards to food,
however, and that is the transition from eating food to eating
artificially-manufactured nutrients, which I heard or read was in the
process. So, agribusiness giants will grow “meat” in labs, and
they’ll look just like fish sticks or boneless chicken breasts but with
the middle-animal cut out of the process, and we’ll all eat fake food to
continue getting along. This will be more “efficient” than raising
cattle in mega-lots with all of that oil, and humanity will escape their
final reckoning once more, albeit living in an ever-more damaged
environment. Already, developing countries are buying land in third
world nations for producing biofuels on a massive scale. In
Mozambique, a couple of national parks have been corruptly sold-off for
such purposes. So much for gentle calihippy
transitions. M