Malcolm, and the group... I'm lurking while visiting in Arnprior (Ottawa Valley) on a friends computer; planning on returning home to VT later today or...
... Ah, the old class thing, forgot about that. Thanks for the clarification. There is also superiority by train order if I recall the many lessons learned...
Thanks for all the input guys.....I do kinda like the idea of running extra on the main and as a scheduled train on the branch...makes it a bit more of an...
... I think we should point out that the Santa Fe didn't have any third class trains (that I know of). So,second class was as low as they went. On a...
Hi Jim, The Santa Fe operated all its mixed trains as second-class trains, whether they were running on main lines or branches. Of course, the only other class...
I think we should point out that the Santa Fe didn't have any third class trains (that I know of). So,second class was as low as they went. On a reailroad...
The Santa Fe mixed trains I'm most familiar with are trains 505 and 506, which served the branch line to San Jacinto, Calif., the San Jacinto District....
Are the "NYC" reporting marks licensed by any railroad ( Similar to what Union Pacific does with it's fallen flags)? Paul Catapano Atlantic Inland Railway...
yeah, csx Larry Denton ... From: Paul Catapano To: OPSIG Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 7:59 PM Subject: [Ops-Ind] NYC Reporting Are the "NYC" reporting marks...
"NYC belongs to CSXT and is used on freight cars and locos acquired from Conrail." Is CSX protecting it as vigorously as UP does? Paul Catapano Atlantic Inland...
... It's on current equipment, I would assume that they are protecting it as much as the CSX reporting marks. It's not really a fair comparison since some of ...
A recent add in Model RR listed B&O and C&O as "Used by permission from CSX" ( Or something to that effect, I don't have the magazine here ). With UP stuff,...
On the MP DeQuincy Division, in the 1940's and 50's, all trains regularly run were scheduled. Passenger trains were First Class, through freights, listed as...
... Reporting marks are not registered trademarks or trade names, despite the fact that Atlas is currently listing a model of an MKT boxcar without heralds or...
... There's a big difference between the UP and NYC/CSX cases. Reporting marks are not a trademark. They are an identification issued by and controlled by...
Did a quick lookup and NYC does not come up as a trademark or service mark. However, New York Central System did and it is listed as abandoned. -- Eric Schwarz...
... as "Redball" ... Looking at MP employee timetables from accross the system from 1951 to around 1960 including a 1960 DeQuincy Division, there are no third ...
George, DeQ Div TT 64, 1/30/55, shows these Third Class freights: No 492 and 493 "Local Freight" Beaumont to Settegast Yard Nos 491 & 492 Anchorage and Port...
When the NYC and PRR reporting marks first started appearing, I asked a CR management employee "What gives?" He explained that all the equipment going to NS...
Sounds suspect to me. The apparent reason was to avoid having to renumber everything at the get go. There were bound to be conflicts in the numbering so just...
I received my Oct issue of the DO today and noticed the callboard listings has been published. On page 17 an error immediately arose to grab my attention. The...
Mine is listed also and is incorrect. Since I sold the house in FL last April, and the new owners chose NOT to keep the layout, and moved to NC, the listing is...
Speaking of "merger" ironies, in 1895 the Chicago and North Western was outbid by $1 million to take over the then bankrupt Union Pacific by some guy named...
... No longer listed. There are no local freights on either the Anchorage Subdiv. or the Houston Subdiv. ... Now listed as second class 891 MWF, 892 TTS. ... ...
Having problems with message search?
Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.
