Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
RangeVoting · Range Voting

Group Information

  • Members: 138
  • Category: Other
  • Founded: Aug 4, 2005
  • Language: English
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want to share photos of your group with the world? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Visit the Groups blog for the latest Yahoo! Groups information

Home

 

Activity within 7 days:

79 New Messages - 3 New Files

Description

RANGE VOTING selects the winner of an N-candidate election:
(a) Each vote consists of assigning a point value from 0 to 99 to each candidate (for example, 30 points for candidate A, 64 for B etc.) The voter might give her favorite candidate a 99 and her least-favorite zero.
(b) If a voter desires to express no opinion about any particular candidate, she may assign an X instead of a point value, indicating "intentional blank."
(c) A candidate's "total score" is the average of all his non-blank scores (average = sum of points voters cast for that candidate divided by the number of voters who did not vote an X for him).
(d) Candidate with highest average wins.
(e) Candidates with too few non-X votes (even though they might have high scores) are not permitted to win.

Range voting has properties superior to other single-winner voting systems:

1) Simplicity;
2) Encourages voter honesty instead of strategy;
3) Can be done on plurality-type "dumb" voting machines;
4) Unaffected by candidate cloning;
5) Best by test in computer simulation experiments measuring Bayesian regret of different voting systems;
6) Reduces spoiled ballots and 2-party domination.

For more information please go to the Center for Range Voting. This bulletin board is the CRV's communication medium. See also our google group. (Also try clicking "links" or text-searching our archive.)

Most Recent Messages

  (View All)
(Group by Topic)
Advanced
   Start Topic
Re: CRV website access stats
My girlfriend works in donor relations at The Trust for Public Land. So she knows a lot about inspiring donors to give. She deals with people who write
Posted - Mon Nov 23, 2009 6:18 am
brokenladdercalendar
brokenladder...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
Re: CRV website access stats
... This is a non-issue. I actually work as a professional web developer here in San Francisco. We do, you know, actual measurements of page load times and
Posted - Mon Nov 23, 2009 6:13 am
brokenladdercalendar
brokenladder...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
IRV is like magic, it requires misdirection to sell, this time to Sa
See comments, post comments. Viewpoints: 'Instant runoff': Better choice, lower cost ShareThis Buzz up!
Posted - Mon Nov 23, 2009 12:16 am
Joyce McCloy
ncverifiable...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
Re: Another auto districting proposal (Crystal districting?)
... Ok, ... A change in the number of districts is always hard to deal with. About 17 of the States had apportionment changes in 2000. You could have a rule
Posted - Sun Nov 22, 2009 12:06 pm
Raph Frank
raphfrk@...
Send Email Send Email
Re: Another auto districting proposal (Crystal districting?)
... The first step to generate the 256*M regions ensures a reasonable degree of population balance since the regions apportioned to each county and city is
Posted - Sun Nov 22, 2009 1:07 am
jimrtex4192
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
Add RangeVoting to your personalized My Yahoo! page Add to My Yahoo! XML What's This?

Message History

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2009 255 191 328 169 216 258 192 336 217 258 251
2008 195 315 341 302 330 411 174 168 154 300 349 390
2007 458 329 388 412 226 505 413 255 309 139 121 123
2006 8 4 24 5 28 129 66 98 76 446 598 482
2005 323 288 194 52 116

Group Email Addresses


Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help