Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
RangeVoting · Range Voting

Group Information

  • Members: 170
  • Category: Other
  • Founded: Aug 4, 2005
  • Language: English
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Hear how Yahoo! Groups has changed the lives of others. Take me there.
Try Yahoo! Groups Chat Beta! Now available on the left menu. Read more...

Home

 

Activity within 7 days:

1 New Member - 7 New Messages

Description

RANGE VOTING selects the winner of an N-candidate election:
(a) Each vote consists of assigning a point value from 0 to 99 to each candidate (for example, 30 points for candidate A, 64 for B etc.) The voter might give her favorite candidate a 99 and her least-favorite zero.
(b) If a voter desires to express no opinion about any particular candidate, she may assign an X instead of a point value, indicating "intentional blank."
(c) A candidate's "total score" is the average of all his non-blank scores (average = sum of points voters cast for that candidate divided by the number of voters who did not vote an X for him).
(d) Candidate with highest average wins.
(e) Candidates with too few non-X votes (even though they might have high scores) are not permitted to win.

Range voting has properties superior to other single-winner voting systems:

1) Simplicity;
2) Encourages voter honesty instead of strategy;
3) Can be done on plurality-type "dumb" voting machines;
4) Unaffected by candidate cloning;
5) Best by test in computer simulation experiments measuring Bayesian regret of different voting systems;
6) Reduces spoiled ballots and 2-party domination.

For more information please go to the Center for Range Voting. This bulletin board is the CRV's communication medium. WARNING: for many purposes, we now are trying to MIGRATE to the election science foundation GoogleGroup instead. (Also try clicking "links" or text-searching our archive.)

Most Recent Messages

  (View All)
(Group by Topic)
Advanced
   Start Topic
Discrete Splitline Algorithm
Since the topic comes up periodically, and actual use of splitline will require recognising discrete shapes, I thought I would have another go at a definition.
Posted - Tue Feb 14, 2012 5:12 pm
Raph Frank
raphfrk@...
Send Email Send Email
Re: Where Did the Benefits of Technology Go?
Terrific idea, very well presented. Along similar lines, I have suggested that we also outsource conventional economists, particularly those specializing in
Posted - Sat Feb 11, 2012 5:38 pm
Stephen Unger
steve.unger
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
Re: Where Did the Benefits of Technology Go?
I agree in general with the points made here, and also with the general thrust of the cited article. I've also written about co-ops, tho mostly about worker
Posted - Sat Feb 11, 2012 4:54 pm
Stephen Unger
steve.unger
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
Re: Where Did the Benefits of Technology Go?
The blog article suggests that compensation reflect production value to society. It is proposed to measure this value by comparing the loss to society of one
Posted - Sat Feb 11, 2012 4:40 pm
Florian Lengyel
f_lengyel
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
Re: Where Did the Benefits of Technology Go?
The reason why the gains of technology have not produced a society in which all people share in those gains is that the automation, robotization and
Posted - Sat Feb 11, 2012 1:35 pm
John Lawrence
jclawrence2
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
Add RangeVoting to your personalized My Yahoo! page Add to My Yahoo! XML What's This?

Message History

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2012 12 7
2011 40 37 55 40 102 80 42 45 56 37 6 37
2010 74 208 149 193 149 156 153 131 154 73 157 151
2009 255 191 328 169 216 258 192 336 217 258 309 177
2008 195 315 341 302 330 411 174 168 154 300 349 390
2007 458 329 388 412 226 505 413 255 309 139 121 123
2006 8 4 24 5 28 129 66 98 76 446 598 482
2005 323 288 194 52 116

Copyright © 2010 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines NEW - Help