Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
RangeVoting · Range Voting

Group Information

  • Members: 106
  • Category: Other
  • Founded: Aug 4, 2005
  • Language: English
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Real people. Real stories. See how Yahoo! Groups impacts members worldwide.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Stay up to speed on the latest Groups news and updates, visit the Groups blog today!

Home

 

Activity within 7 days:

2 New Members - 1 New Link - 46 New Messages - 2 New Files

Description

RANGE VOTING selects the winner of an N-candidate election:
(a) Each vote consists of assigning a point value from 0 to 99 to each candidate (for example, 30 points for candidate A, 64 for B etc.) The voter might give her favorite candidate a 99 and her least-favorite zero.
(b) If a voter desires to express no opinion about any particular candidate, she may assign an X instead of a point value, indicating "intentional blank."
(c) A candidate's "total score" is the average of all his non-blank scores (average = sum of points voters cast for that candidate divided by the number of voters who did not vote an X for him).
(d) Candidate with highest average wins.
(e) Candidates with too few non-X votes (even though they might have high scores) are not permitted to win.

Range voting has properties superior to other single-winner voting systems:

1) Simplicity;
2) Encourages voter honesty instead of strategy;
3) Can be done on plurality-type "dumb" voting machines;
4) Unaffected by candidate cloning;
5) Best by test in computer simulation experiments measuring Bayesian regret of different voting systems;
6) Reduces spoiled ballots and 2-party domination.

For more information please go to the Center for Range Voting. This bulletin board is the CRV's communication medium. (Also try clicking "links" or text-searching our archive.)

Most Recent Messages

  (View All)
(Group by Topic)
Advanced
   Start Topic
Posted - Sat Sep 6, 2008 6:14 pm
Rick Carback
carback1
Online Now Online Now
Send Email Send Email
Re: scantegrity II antifraud voting protocol, two papers describing
... We are working on a way to print and tally in a distributed way, but this is a problem that is inherent in a printed ballot system. Election official +
Posted - Sat Sep 6, 2008 6:13 pm
Rick Carback
carback1
Online Now Online Now
Send Email Send Email
Re: scantegrity II antifraud voting protocol, two papers describing
yeah, well the tech review piece was so lame it never even mentioned the word "scantegrity", giving the poor reader almost no chance to track this down. ... I
Posted - Sat Sep 6, 2008 6:07 pm
warren_d_smith31
warren_d_smi...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
Re: scantegrity II antifraud voting protocol, two papers describing
I wouldn't overestimate the ability to defeat the invisible ink, the original proposal did not use it and still had quite a few good properties. Re Black
Posted - Sat Sep 6, 2008 5:53 pm
Rick Carback
carback1
Online Now Online Now
Send Email Send Email
Re: scantegrity II antifraud voting protocol, two papers describing
I just checked and wrote a response @ TechReview: Unfortunately, A summarized description of the system (like what is in this article) is never going to
Posted - Sat Sep 6, 2008 5:43 pm
Rick Carback
carback1
Online Now Online Now
Send Email Send Email
Add RangeVoting to your personalized My Yahoo! page Add to My Yahoo! XML What's This?

Message History

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2008 195 315 341 302 330 411 174 168 40
2007 458 329 388 412 226 505 413 255 309 139 121 123
2006 8 4 24 5 28 129 66 98 76 446 598 482
2005 323 288 194 52 116

Group Email Addresses


Copyright © 2007 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help