Subject: Land Letter: Grazing concerns fueling debate over Ore. land transfer
Grazing concerns fueling debate over Ore. land transfer (11/19/2009)
Scott Streater, E&E reporter
A proposal to transfer thousands of acres of national forest in southern Oregon to the National Park Service has renewed debate over whether the Forest Service should control some of the nation's most environmentally sensitive lands.
The controversy stems from a bill sponsored by two of Oregon's senior Democratic lawmakers, Sen. Ron Wyden and Rep. Peter DeFazio, that would transfer 4,070 acres from the Rogue River-Siskiyou National Forest to the adjacent Oregon Caves National Monument, managed by the Park Service.
The lawmakers argue the Park Service is better equipped to maintain forest trails and campgrounds, and that the Forest Service has failed to protect the land from the effects of grazing, including the polluting of the monument's drinking water source with livestock manure.
But the "Oregon Caves National Monument Boundary Act" highlights much bigger problems for the Forest Service, including years of steep budget cuts and the redistribution of tens of millions of dollars from national forest upkeep and maintenance programs to firefighting accounts.
The bill also points to ongoing concerns about the Forest Service's multiuse mission, which holds that the agency must manage its holdings for timber harvesting, energy development, grazing and recreational activities while also implementing sound conservation practices across 191 million acres of public land.
"I think it's both a budget issue and a question of whether a multiuse agency can effectively manage these fragile natural sources," said Ron Tipton, senior vice president for policy at the National Parks Conservation Association, or NPCA. "The Forest Service does it well in a few places, but not in many."
Joseph Walsh, a spokesman at the Forest Service's headquarters in Washington, D.C., declined to comment on the legislation or the issues behind it. Rogue River-Siskiyou National Forest supervisor, Scott Conroy, also declined comment, saying it was inappropriate to discuss "pending legislation."
Following Washington's lead
But the Oregon Caves National Monument proposal is not the first time Congress has sought to transfer national forest land to the Park Service.
Lawmakers from neighboring Washington have sought to transfer management of the Mount St. Helens National Volcanic Monument, deep within the 1.3-million-acre Gifford Pinchot National Forest, from the Forest Service to the Park Service, in part to provide the monument with direct appropriations from Congress and end the Forest Service's practice of raiding its budget to meet other priorities (Land Letter, March 26).
But the Forest Service, an agency of the Agriculture Department, has shown no willingness to cede its land holdings in either state to another agency and department.
In testimony this week before a House subcommittee, Forest Service officials resisted ceding control of the Rogue River-Siskiyou acreage, arguing instead for more time to develop a cooperative monument management plan with the Park Service.
"We believe inter-agency cooperation would carry out the purpose of the bill to enhance the protection of the resources associated with the monument and increase public recreation opportunities through a joint public involvement and review process, to ensure that public concerns and desires are addressed," said Lenise Lago, deputy regional forester for the Forest Service's Pacific Northwest region.
Steve Whitesell, NPS associate director for park planning, facilities and lands, testified at the same hearing that it could cost the agency as much as $750,000 a year to manage and maintain the additional 4,070 acres.
But issues of sufficient funding and preserving sensitive lands, while central to the Forest Service's land management mandates, cannot be solved by any inter-agency agreement, said Sean Smith, policy director for the NPCA's northwest regional office in Seattle.
"We're supporting this transfer proposal because we believe it's better for the resources, recreational opportunities and the regional economy," Smith said. "The benefits would outweigh any of the costs."
Saving a cave stream
From near the peak of Mount Elijah in the Siskiyou mountain range, Cave Creek flows downhill through the Rogue River-Siskiyou National Forest and into the Oregon Caves National Monument before eventually emptying into the Pacific Ocean.
Along the way, Cave Creek provides drinking water for monument visitors, but officials say that is not at the core of the debate over which agency should manage the river and its broader watershed.
Rather, the 4,000-acre section of national forest is supposed to act as a kind of buffer zone for the creek as it emerges from the mountains and winds its way toward the cave. But Park Service officials say pollution from cattle grazing on the national forest property threatens to erode water quality in the monument.
To the chagrin of Park Service officials, the Forest Service granted permission to a local rancher to graze hundreds of head of cattle in the Cave Creek watershed. In exchange for the grazing allotment, the rancher is supposed to erect fences and other physical barriers to keep the cattle out of the monument property and far away from from where the creek enters the caves.
"But the Forest Service has never gotten the rancher to implement that part of the agreement," said Vicki Snitzler, the monument superintendent in Cave Junction, Ore.
That raises the possibility of cow manure, dirt and other polluted runoff being deposited into the creek. By transferring the 4,000 acres to the Park Service, the government could buy back the grazing allotment, estimated to be worth about $200,000.
"The main purpose of the expansion [legislation] is to draw a boundary around the watershed, to protect water in the cave as well as the drinking water for monument visitors," said Snitzler. In fact, the general management plan for the Oregon Caves National Monument, finalized in 2000, includes a stipulation that the Cave Creek land be transferred from the Forest Service to the Park Service.
"We don't see that rancher as a bad guy at all. But in order to protect the stream, they need to put an end of grazing," said Smith, the NPCA's regional director.
Extending NPS's reach
Shifting control of the Rogue River-Siskiyou National Forest property to the National Park Service also would support the findings of a recent sweeping study that recommended expanding the national park system.
The report, entitled "Advancing the National Park Idea," was commissioned by the NPCA and written by a panel of distinguished luminaries, including former U.S. Sen. Howard Baker Jr., and retired Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor.
Among other things, the report notes that the Interior Department's failure to expand the 84-million-acre park system has fostered conditions whereby "familiar open landscapes are disappearing before the relentless advance of suburban sprawl and big-box commerce" (Land Letter, Sept. 24).
"There's a growing sense that the NPS is not complete and that some of the areas that belong in the national park system are currently managed by either the Forest Service or the BLM," said Tipton, the NPCA policy director.
Scott Streater writes from Colorado Springs, Colo.
Subject: Endangered Mexican Gray Wolves Get a Boost on Road to Recovery
For Immediate Release
Contacts: Eva Sargent, Defenders of Wildlife, (520) 834-6441
Sandy Bahr, Sierra Club – Grand Canyon (Arizona) Chapter (602) 999-5790
Matt Kenna, Western Environmental Law Center, (970) 385-6941 x 131
Michael Robinson, Center for Biological Diversity (575) 534-0360
Greta Anderson, Western Watersheds Project (520) 623-1878
Kim Crumbo, Grand Canyon Wildlands Council (928) 638-2304
Endangered Mexican Gray Wolves Get a Boost on Road to Recovery
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service retakes helm of Mexican wolf management
TUCSON, Ariz. (Nov. 13, 2009) — The Mexican gray wolf recovery effort took a pivotal turn in the right direction today as the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service reclaimed its decision-making authority over management of this highly endangered animal that roams Arizona and New Mexico’s backcountry.
Settling a lawsuit brought by conservation organizations, the Fish and Wildlife Service reasserted its authority over a multiagency management team and scrapped a controversial wolf “control” rule that required permanently removing a wolf from the wild, either lethally or through capture, after killing three livestock in a year. Conservationists had criticized the rigid policy, known as Standard Operating Procedure 13 or SOP 13, for forcing wolves to be killed or sent to captivity regardless of an individual wolf’s genetic importance, dependent pups or the critically low numbers of wolves in the wild.
“We’re happy to see the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service once again accepting its responsibility for recovering these endangered wolves,” said Eva Sargent, Defenders of Wildlife’s Southwest program director. “With so few Mexican wolves in the wild, we need to restore the role of science – and this is a good step in that direction. Now, the Fish and Wildlife Service must begin to develop a credible recovery plan.”
At last count in January 2009, there were just 52 Mexican gray wolves and only two breeding pairs in the wild in Arizona and New Mexico. Another count will take place in January 2010. Before reintroduction began in 1998, the Fish and Wildlife Service had projected 102 wolves including 18 breeding pairs by the end of 2006, with numbers expected to rise thereafter.
For several years, the Mexican Wolf Adaptive Management Oversight Committee, also known as AMOC, had called the shots on whether or not a wolf would stay in the wild. AMOC was organized to bring other agencies to the table, but the Fish and Wildlife Service – in an unusual move – had ceded control of the Mexican gray wolf’s reintroduction to the committee.
Under AMOC’s direction, the Mexican gray wolf recovery effort became less about helping this endangered wolf return to its home range and more about wolf control and appeasing anti-wolf interests in the recovery area.
“With the Mexican gray wolf on the brink of a second extinction in the wild, more wolves need to be left on the ground and wolves need to be introduced in more areas in the Southwest,” said Michael Robinson, conservation advocate for the Center for Biological Diversity. “A new recovery plan is needed to identify more places for Mexican gray wolves to be introduced, including potentially the Grand Canyon, southern Rockies and Mexico.”
Meanwhile, the Fish and Wildlife Service has recently signaled that it is ready to make a change for the better, coming up with new programs to help local landowners coexist with wolves.
“This settlement marks an essential step in refocusing the Mexican wolf recovery effort, but the Service will have to get to work on a science-based recovery plan in order to stop the Mexican wolf’s slide toward extinction,” said Kim Crumbo, director of conservation for the Grand Canyon Wildlands Council.
“We welcome a new management policy that will bring them closer to recovery,” said Matt Kenna of the Western Environmental Law Center, who represented the plaintiffs: “It is important that the power over Mexican wolf recovery has been returned to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service where it belongs under the law.”
The plaintiffs in the case were Defenders of Wildlife, Center for Biological Diversity, Western Watersheds Project, New Mexico Audubon Council, New Mexico Wilderness Alliance, University of New Mexico Wilderness Alliance, The Wildlands Network, Sierra Club, Southwest Environmental Center and Grand Canyon Wildlands Council.
Subject: NEWS: Conservationists File Suit Against Federal Agencies to End Bison Slaughter
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: November 9, 2009
CONSERVATIONISTS FILE SUIT AGAINST FEDERAL AGENCIES TO END BISON SLAUGHTER Failed Management Endangering American Icon, Wasting Millions Annually
Contacts: Tom Woodbury 830-3099 Stephany Seay 646-0070
MISSOULA, MONTANA - A coalition of conservation groups, Native Americans, and Montanans are suing the National Park Service for their role in slaughtering 3,300 wild American bison that inhabit Yellowstone National Park. Approximately 3,000 bison remain in Yellowstone today because of aggressive population control implemented under the controversial Interagency Bison Management Plan (IBMP) adopted nine years ago. Download Complaint
The groups assert that the Park Service is violating its statutory mission to preserve wild bison and "leave them unimpaired for the enjoyment of future generations."
The suit also cites the U.S. Forest Service for failing to manage the Gallatin National Forest in a way that would allow for healthy populations of bison, sage grouse, and related wildlife. Both agencies have refused requests by plaintiffs and others to reconsider the bison management plan in light of new scientific information and changed circumstances related to bison, including a recent independent study which concluded that the actual risk of disease transmission from free-roaming bison to cattle in Montana would be zero in most years, and limited to predictable "hot spots" in others. Download Kilpatrick 2009
Rosebud Sioux tribal elder Rosalie Little Thunder, chairperson for plaintiff Seventh Generation Fund's Tatanka Oyate Project, says, "The continuing slaughter of wild buffalo by the National Park Service is an affront to indigenous peoples and an abrogation of the government's trust responsibilities to the American people and American Tribes."
According to Tom Woodbury, the Montana Director for Western Watersheds Project, the lead plaintiff in the suit, the IBMP is broken. "One of the twin aims of the bison plan was 'to ensure the wild and free-ranging nature of American bison'" said Woodbury. "While the Park Service was sending over 1400 bison to slaughter in 2008, a Congressional investigation was concluding that the agencies are no closer to ensuring free-roaming bison today then they were in 2000," Woodbury said.
In a report released in 2008, the Government Accountability Office determined that the IBMP agencies, "lack accountability among themselves and to the public." Download GAO Report
The American bison is recognized as a keystone species. Bison's distinctive grazing, wallowing and horning behavior creates important habitat for many "species of concern" in Montana, including the sage grouse.
According to Glenn Hockett, a range ecologist and President of the plaintiff Gallatin Wildlife Association, "Bison play a key role in keeping prairie grasslands healthy and are an important food source for human hunters, grizzly bears, wolves, eagles, and many other species. Our members value wild bison as a Montana big game species as well as for wildlife viewing and photography."
A recent study by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service concluded that "wildlife watching is a major force, driving billions in spending around the country."
"These economic impacts can be the life-blood of a local economy," according to the study, and "rural areas can attract thousands of wildlife watchers each year, generating millions of dollars."
Meghan Gill, a doctoral student at the University of Montana and long time bison advocate, joined in the suit for her own reasons. "The cruelty to these animals that I and others have witnessed should not be part of a sanctioned government plan," Gill said.
"I've watched government agents haze bison with helicopters in the dead of winter, forcing them to expend the energy they need to survive harsh conditions," Gill continued, "run them into barbed wire, over frozen lakes where the bison drowned when the ice broke, and worse."
Gill said she finds it particularly disturbing that "every spring the government agents repeatedly haze calving female bison and newborn calves miles into the park off of Horse Butte peninsula despite the protests of local residents who have attempted to create a bison sanctuary there by buying out all the ranches and removing all the cows. This year they even chased a newborn calf with a broken leg," Gill said, "but every year there are similar stories."
Gill maintains that "the day-to-day bison management operations are a complete waste of taxpayer dollars on an inexcusable, illogical plan that most people would never condone if they witnessed it themselves."
Stephany Seay, a spokesperson for Buffalo Field Campaign, another plaintiff in the suit, disputes the common but unsubstantiated claim by the State of Montana that lethal bison management is necessary to protect livestock from brucellosis, a minor European cattle disease. "Brucellosis is a fraud being used by the cattle industry to maintain control over public lands grazing," Seay said. "This issue is not about brucellosis at all; it's a centuries-old range war being fought over who gets to eat the grass."
The Yellowstone bison population includes America's last continuously wild herds, and is the last population that still follows its migratory instincts. As unique native herbivores that evolved across the North American continent, scientists believe bison can help restore the native grasslands, sagebrush steppes, and prairie ecosystems that are considered to be some of the most endangered habitats in the world.
Dr. Sara Johnson with Native Ecosystems Council, another party to the suit, points out that sagebrush has been called "the mother of all ecosystems." She says, "contrary to the prevailing view of these lands as scrublands when cattle were introduced, sagebrush habitat has more biological diversity associated with it than any other habitat we know of." Johnson says, "managing natural bison habitat for cattle, as the Forest Service has been doing for too long, favors invasive weeds, degrades our shared landscapes, and harms sensitive species like sage grouse, pygmy rabbits, and Brewer's sparrow."
The coalition is asking the Court to prevent the U.S. Forest Service and National Park Service from continuing to participate in, allocate funding for, or permit the slaughter of wild bison on public lands, including trapping for transport to slaughter houses and quarantine facilities. The suit would not affect the state of Montana's bison hunt, scheduled to begin November 15, 2009, nor would it affect Native American tribes that retain treaty rights to hunt bison on National Forest lands.
"Instead of federal persecution," Seay concluded, "America's last wild bison population deserves federal protection."
###
PLAINTIFFS ON THE SUIT:
WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT is a regional, membership, not-for-profit conservation organization, dedicated to protecting and conserving the public lands and natural resources of watersheds in the American West. WWP has its headquarters at the Greenfire Preserve in Custer County, Idaho; and is supported by more than 1,400 members located throughout the United States, including in Montana. WWP's Montana office is in Missoula, and it also has offices and other staff in Boise, Hailey, and Salmon, Idaho, Wyoming, Utah, Arizona, and California. Through these staff, and with the assistance of numerous unpaid members and supporters, WWP is deeply involved in seeking to improve livestock grazing management on federal and state public lands, including on the federal lands at issue in this case. WWP is also involved in seeking to protect native wildlife and their habitat across the west, including bison and sage grouse. http://westernwatersheds.org
BUFFALO FIELD CAMPAIGN is a non-profit public interest organization founded in 1997 to stop the slaughter of Yellowstone's wild bison, protect the natural habitat of wild free-roaming bison and other native wildlife, and to work with people of all Nations to honor the sacredness of the wild bison. BFC has its headquarters in West Yellowstone, Gallatin County, Montana, and is supported by volunteers and participants around the world who value America’s native wildlife and the ecosystems upon which they depend, and enjoy the natural wonders of our National Parks and Forests. http://www.buffalofieldcampaign.org
TATANKA OYATE is a project of the Seventh Generation Fund, an Indigenous nonprofit organization dedicated to promoting and maintaining the uniqueness of Native peoples throughout the Americas. Tatanka Oyate works to protect and restore the habitat of the last wild bison population in Yellowstone and create awareness for protecting and preserving sacred species in the plains region, an area of special significance to Native cultures. Tatanka Oyate was organized specifically to find the means to protect the genetically unique Yellowstone bison population. http://www.7genfund.org
GALLATIN WILDLIFE ASSOCIATION is a non-profit wildlife conservation organization based in Gallatin County, Montana. GWA represents concerned hunters and anglers in Southwest Montana and elsewhere. GWA is an affiliate of the Montana Wildlife Federation, which is an affiliate of the National Wildlife Federation. GWA is supported and run by volunteers, who advocate for adequate habitat for native wildlife, and opportunities for the public to view, hunt, and otherwise enjoy such wildlife and public lands. http://www.gallatinwildlifeassociation.org
NATIVE ECOSYSTEMS COUNCIL is a non-profit Montana corporation with its principal place of business at Willow Creek, Gallatin County. Native Ecosystems Council is dedicated to the conservation of natural resources and the preservation of the Gallatin National Forest. NEC has participated extensively in administrative actions to protect these forests from environmentally damaging plans and activities, and to protect native wildlife and their habitat. Contact: Dr. Sara Jane Johnson (406) 285-3611
THE YELLOWSTONE BUFFALO FOUNDATION, located in Bozeman, Montana, is committed to restoring buffalo (bison) on public land managed by states and the U.S. Government. The Yellowstone Buffalo Foundation aims to build a consensus on the national importance of wild, free ranging, genetically viable core herds of the animal named bison, also known as the American Buffalo, recognizing that there is presently a problem with buffalo range and habitat as illustrated by annual migrations of these wild buffalo out of Yellowstone National Park. The Yellowstone Buffalo Foundation works to find resolutions that recognize that humans share a biological ecosystem with all other life, including the buffalo. http://www.yellowstonebuffalofoundation.org/index.html
MEGHAN GILL is an individual who resides in Missoula, Montana in Missoula County. Gill is a former volunteer and staff member of the Buffalo Field Campaign, and has been concerned about and involved with the issue of bison management for several years. Since 2000, Ms. Gill has annually visited areas in and around Yellowstone National Park for the express purpose of viewing bison and other native wildlife in their natural habitat, and for advocating for their right and need to have year-round access to habitat outside of YNP.
CHARLES (CHUCK) IRESTONE is an individual who resides in Missoula, Montana in Missoula County. Irestone has been involved with advocacy for bison and other native species since 1998. Mr. Irestone has visited Yellowstone National Park and the surrounding areas numerous times annually since 1994. Mr. Irestone considers the Yellowstone bison the iconic symbol of our nation and a guide to our path of sustainability. Wild bison in the GYE and Mr. Irestone's bison advocacy work inspired Mr. Irestone to cofound the Sustainable Business Council in Missoula. Every year, Mr. Irestone hikes in the back country of Yellowstone to see the bison in their natural setting, and intends to continue to do so.
DANIEL BRISTER is an individual who resides in Arlee, Montana in Lake County. Brister is a staff member of the BFC, and has been involved with bison advocacy since December, 1997. Mr. Brister travels to West Yellowstone regularly to conduct work for BFC, and to view wild bison in their native habitat. Mr. Brister first visited YNP in 1992, and was particularly moved by seeing wild bison in the area. He derives aesthetic, spiritual, cultural, and recreational enjoyment and benefits from viewing wild bison undisturbed in their native habitat, and his interests and enjoyment of the wild bison are injured by the agencies’ management actions that harm the bison, and threaten the future integrity of bison populations in the GYE.
--
Media & Outreach
Buffalo Field Campaign P.O. Box 957 West Yellowstone, MT 59758 406-646-0070 bfc-media@...
http://www.buffalofieldcampaign.org
BFC is the only group working in the field every day
in defense of the last wild buffalo population in the U.S.
Stay informed! Get our weekly email Updates from the Field:
Send your email address to bfc-media@...
* View BFC Video Footage: http://www.buffalofieldcampaign.org
Ag groups challenge grazing injunction Appeals court urged to allow new BLM rules to stand By MATEUSZ PERKOWSKI Capital Press
Agriculture groups have asked a federal appeals court to overturn an injunction that blocked rancher-friendly regulations from going into effect.
The regulations, which the Bureau of Land Management planned to put in place in 2006, would have changed numerous policies related to livestock grazing on public lands. Before the rules were implemented, the Western Watersheds Project activist group filed a legal complaint alleging BLM had violated federal environmental and administrative laws.
Federal District Judge Lynn Winmill agreed with the group and issued several orders that stopped the rules from taking effect. "They limit public input from the non-ranching public, offer ranchers more rights on BLM land, restrict the BLM's monitoring of grazing damage, extend the deadlines for corrective action and dilute the BLM's authority to sanction ranchers for grazing violations," Winmill said in his decision.
Internal documents cautioned against the changes, but agency officials disregarded them, the judge said.
The BLM violated statutes that require it to take a "hard look" at the environmental consequences of its actions and to consult with other agencies about effects on endangered species, the judge said.
The rules would also have impermissibly cut the public out of decision-making processes, Winmill said.
The Public Lands Council and the American Farm Bureau Federation, which voluntarily intervened in the case as defendants, appealed the decision to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
A three-judge appellate panel heard oral arguments in the case in Portland, Ore., on Monday, Nov. 2.
Experts within the federal government did have differing opinions about the regulations' effects, said Roderick Walston, an attorney for the Public Lands Council. However, the BLM properly took all those views into consideration before reaching a final decision, as required by law, he said.
As a federal judge, Winmill could only decide whether BLM properly followed decision-making procedures -- not whether he agreed with the final outcome, Walston said.
Instead, Winmill substituted his judgment for that of the agency, which goes against legal precedent established by the U.S. Supreme Court, he said.
The Western Watersheds Project countered that the decision-making process itself was flawed.
Laird Lucas, an attorney for the group, said BLM suppressed and sanitized scientific opinions that didn't square with the agency's vision for the new regulations. "It went badly astray because it did not listen to its own experts," Lucas said.
The legal dispute over BLM's regulations is further complicated by the federal government's decision not to challenge Winmill's decision. The BLM withdrew its appeal last year, leaving the Public Lands Council and the American Farm Bureau Federation to pursue the matter on their own. Apart from the merits of the appeal, appellate judges will need to decide if the two farm groups still have legal standing in the case.
The government and environmentalist groups claim the groups lost that standing when the BLM decided to abide by Winmill's ruling.
The Public Lands Council and the American Farm Bureau say they still have standing because they represent people who have been harmed by the injunction.
----- Original Message -----
From: "grouser2004" <deeble@...>
To: <sagegrouse@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2009 2:45 PM
Subject: [sagegrouse] Breaking news: fresh monograph on sage-grouse and
conservation
> Ecology and Conservation of Greater Sage-Grouse: A Landscape Species and
> Its Habitats
>
> A release of a scientific monograph with permission of the authors, the
> Cooper Ornithological Society, and the University of California Press
>
> Twenty-four new chapters on sage-grouse and sagebrush habitat
> conservation...
>
> Download chapters at http://sagemap.wr.usgs.gov/monograph.aspx
>
>
>
Here’s the basic citation for the sagebrush monograph published last week — web links take you to abstract and order form. Price is $20. Monograph of Artemisia Subgenus Tridentatae (Asteraceae–Anthemideae), Leila M. Shultz, 19 Oct 2009. Volume 89, Systematic Botany Monographs, 131 pp, color frontispiece. ISBN 978-0-912861-89-0. US orders: $20.00; non-US-orders: $25.00. abstract [see: http://herbarium.lsa.umich.edu/SBMweb/index.html]
Please feel free to forward to anyone you think might be interested (no royalties here, I guarantee). – L.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Leila Shultz, Professor Emeritus and Director Floristics Lab, College of Natural Resources, BNR 276 Utah State University Logan, UT 84322-5230 Ph. 435-797-0485 Email: l.shultz@.... Digital Atlas of Utah Plants (new version in 2009)
This is a glowing review from a regional botanist of the FS:
I wanted to bring to your attention this just-published Monograph of Artemisia subgenus Tridentatae by Dr. Leila Shultz. I received my copy earlier this week and I can't recommend it enough. It's an absolutely fantastic and should be on the bookshelf (and field gear) of every botanist, ecologist, range con, wildlife biologist working in the West. It covers (in depth) 13 species and 12 subspecies of the shrubby Artemisias endemic to the western U.S. There is a terrific introduction to the group which includes taxonomic history, morphology and anatomy, classification and phytogeography. It is accompanied by excellent maps, key to the species qne in-depth descriptions and commentary - including hybrid taxa. Each taxon is elaborately illustrated by Linda Vorobik, one of the best botanical artists working in the US today. This is an exceptional piece of work and I encourage all of you to get yourself a copy (or more) and spread the word far and wide to your field techs, bios, ecologists, etc
fyi
cheers -- Larry Zuckerman, Central Idaho Director Western Watersheds Project PO Box 1322 Salmon, Idaho 83467
"prevents the Environmental Protection Agency from being allowed to gather any data on the contribution that animal agriculture makes to climate change"
If you know you will not like the answer, do not even allow the question to be asked - great shades of Bush43 !!!
Subject: [RN] US House passes amendment banning measurement oflivestock-related global warming gases
A Free Pass for Factory Farms?
Mark Twain noted that "No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session." Apparently the efforts to combat global warming aren't safe either, as an obscure procedural vote in the House of Representatives this week threw a major roadblock in the way of science-based solutions.
By a vote of 267-147, the House passed a motion by Rep. Mike Simpson (R-Idaho), instructing the conference committee on the Interior Appropriations bill to keep an amendment by Rep. Tom Latham (R-Iowa) that prevents the Environmental Protection Agency from being allowed to gather any data on the contribution that animal agriculture makes to climate change. The House bill had included this Latham provision, but the Senate had rejected a similar amendment by Sen. Sam Brownback (R-Kansas), meaning the conferees from both chambers had to negotiate on whether it stayed in the final bill.
The Senate and House leaders of the Interior Appropriations subcommittees, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) and Rep. Norm Dicks (D-Wash.), fought hard to defeat these hostile maneuvers by lawmakers too closely aligned with agribusiness and to preserve the EPA's authority to collect data on greenhouse gas emissions from the largest industrial factory farms. After the House vote, though, the bill was finalized with the Latham amendment included, and will soon be sent to the president for his signature.
The HSUS and a coalition of environmental and public health groups have petitioned the EPA to begin regulating air pollution from factory farms, and the agency recently announced that the largest animal factories (only those emitting more than 25,000 tons of greenhouse gases from manure) would have to report on their emissions. But now Congress will block the agency's action.
The rhetoric on the House floor from Simpson and others would make one think that a simple reporting requirement would force every American farmer out of business, and all the agricultural jobs would move to Mexico, Brazil, and Argentina. Simpson even opined: "If the EPA had existed in Biblical times, there is no question in my mind that it would have regulated gas emissions from Noah's Ark. Poor Noah and his livestock; they could withstand a 40-day flood, but they would never have survived the EPA."
But Noah wasn't confining animals in industrial factories, dumping thousands of tons of manure into lagoons, polluting our air and water, jeopardizing public health, or harming rural communities. Chairman Dicks pointed out the narrow focus of the agency's rule, noting "that thousands of small farmers would be exempted, and only the 90 largest manure management systems in the country would be required to report their emissions, those who annually emit as much in greenhouse gases as 58,000 barrels of oil." It's a setback for science and transparency, and it ties the hands of the U.S. at a time when our federal officials are about to sit down with leaders of many other countries in Copenhagen to try to reach an agreement on how to meet this global challenge. How can we develop good public policy solutions based on sound science if we can't even collect data? With worldwide animal agriculture accounting for nearly one-fifth (or perhaps more) of all greenhouse gas emissions, Congress must stop giving the livestock sector a free pass-every industry must come to the table and be part of the solution.
Here are links for a new climate change report that addresses climate change and agriculture in U.S. Also an article about their findings. The graphic with the number of days over 100 F is quite alarming to me, and if salmonids could complain, to them, too.
Subject: [RN] How Refreshing!!!!! Center and Kieran Suckling Tells It Like It Is!
Apocalypse Soon: Halloween Interview on Overpopulation with Kierán Suckling
Scared of ghosts, goblins, and jack-o-lanterns? None of those are on theSanta Fe Reporter's list of the top five environmental horrors. But human overpopulation is. "Apocalypse Soon: Today's Environmental Horrors Could Lead to a Scary Sci-Fi Future" interviews Center for Biological Diversity director Kierán Suckling. Click below to read the whole article. Here are few excerpts:
"Virtually everything that is destroying wildlife habitat and the environment is driven by overpopulation," Kierán Suckling, executive director of the nonprofit Center for Biological Diversity, says.
"Whether it's too many people diverting water out of the Rio Grande or too much wood use leading to the logging of old-growth forests…the bottom line is there are too many people using too many resources to be able to have a healthy environment."
"It's great to focus on reducing our carbon footprint, but...unless we start reducing the footprints to begin with, we and other species are not going to survive on this planet."
"The majority of environmental groups avoid addressing overpopulation like the plague…I think that's largely because they lack the courage of their convictions… they are fearful that in saying that [we are overpopulated] they will be viewed as being anti-human somehow--as if squalor and overpopulation is somehow pro-human."
The human population doubled from 1 to 2 billion between the years 1800 and 1930 — an unparalleled event in the planet’s history. No large mammal had ever grown to such numbers or commandeered so many resources. The impact on North America’s native species was devastating:
Driven extinct by hunters, the last eastern woodland bison was seen in West Virginia in 1825.
Undulata delissea, a Hawaiian plant, was driven extinct in 1865 by domestic cattle.
The beautiful Falls-of-the-Ohio scurfpea, which existed on a single island, was drowned by U.S. Dam No. 41 in Kentucky in 1881.
The Whiteline topminnow was last seen Alabama in 1899, its spring habitat repeatedly pumped dry by the growing human population.
The Culebra parrot was hunted and collected to extinction in Puerto Rico by 1899.
The Rocky Mountain grasshopper was purposefully driven extinct — a bounty was even placed on its head — by 1903.
Merriam’s elk was hunted to extinction in Arizona in 1906.
The Tennessee riffleshell disappeared in 1930 due to pollution and dams.
The human population doubled again by 1975, this time taking just 45 years. The rate of extinction also increased. Today’s population stands at 6.8 billion and, if it continues on course, will reach 8 billion in 2020 before leveling off at about 9 billion in 2050. If it doesn’t level off, the worldwide population could theoretically reach 15 billion by 2050, but that is unlikely due to the insurmountable economic, political, and ecological crises that would likely ensue.
By any ecological measure, Homo sapiens sapiens has exceeded its sustainable population size. Just a single human waste product — greenhouse gas — has altered the chemistry of the planet’s skies and oceans, causing global warming and ocean acidification.
In the United States, which has the world’s third-highest population after China and India, the fertility rate is rising again after leveling off and declining in previous decades. Our rate of reproduction is now at its highest level since 1971. At 2.1 children per woman, the birthrate is the highest of any developed nation and well above the developed-world average of 1.6. Our current population tops 300 million and is projected to grow by 50 percent by mid-century, eventually approaching 450 million.
Discussion of overpopulation has become somewhat taboo in the environmental movement. To change this dynamic, more than 200 conservationists and scientists, including the Center for Biological Diversity, pledged during the February 2009 Global Population Speak Out to promote awareness of the problem.
The Center’s primary mission is to stop the planetary extinction crisis that’s wiping out rare plants and animals in every nation, ocean, and ecosystem on earth. Explosive, unsustainable human population growth is an essential cause of the extinction crisis.
Through the empowerment of women, education of all people, universal access to birth control, and a societal commitment to ensuring that all species are given a chance to live and thrive, we can reduce our own population to an ecologically sustainable level. This will decrease human poverty and crowding, increase our standard of living, and sustain the lives of plants, animals, and ecosystems everywhere.
With 54 percent of the world's remaining sage grouse and some of the country's largest natural gas reserves, Wyoming is at the epicenter of environmental concerns about the survival of the important bird species. The Obama administration faces a February deadline to decide if the sage grouse should be declared an endangered species.
Beginning today WyoFile publishes in its entirety the first comprehensive study of the potential impact on sage grouse from increased oil and gas exploration in the Intermountain West. The three-year study, conducted by researchers from the Nature Conservancy, Audubon Society and the University of Montana, predicts a 7-19 percent decline in sage grouse populations in addition to the 45-80 percent already lost. However, the report also outlines potential cooperation between industry and environmentalists that could greatly lessen the impact. As University of Montana wildlife landscape ecologist David Naugle told the New York Times/Greenwire in a recent story :
"The answer to energy development in the West is not 'no,' but rather 'where.' I think our nation's energy independence is paramount. Thus the way we designed this study was to be helpful."
WyoFile editors scour hundreds of sources every day for important and interesting news about Wyoming. If you read nothing else about Wyoming, read the Wyoming News Reader.
Recently Published on WyoFile:
Many studies have quantified the indirect effect of hydrocarbon-based economies on climate change and biodiversity, concluding that a significant proportion of species will be threatened with extinction. However, few studies have measured the direct effect of new energy production infrastructure on species persistence.
There has been a massive consumption of private land in the West, and our communities cannot afford to service the sprawling development patterns. When the market inevitably implodes, bringing negative land values, we end up creating “zombie landscapes,” of platted and unbuilt subdivisions.
Probably less than five percent of the traffic on Interstate-80 is by Wyoming residents. And more importantly, probably less than one thousandth of the total weight of vehicles on I-80 is benefiting Wyoming.
And yet we are watching the spectacle of our legislators and our Wyoming Department of Transportation (WYDOT) agonize over how to keep this multi-billion dollar road in good repair.
WyoFile, the state's leading public policy and politics website, seeks your help identifying and honoring elected Wyoming officials and community leaders who have demonstrated outstanding performance or potential.
This could be your mayor, city council or school board member, state legislator or county commissioner, as well as any candidates for those positions. Or it can be a local political party leader, union official, charity organizer or social service volunteer. Important attributes include are hard work on behalf of their constituency; principled political stands, good works; and public accessibility.
Once a list has been finalized, the honorees will receive citations as WyoFile Outstanding Leaders. WyoFile reporters will profile the outstanding individuals on WyoFile.com. In some cases, WyoFile will follow an individual's career as it progresses, periodically updating the profile.
RENO, Nev. — A new federal proposal to manage wild horses is rekindling debate over another fixture of the Western range: cattle.
Interior Secretary Ken Salazar last week proposed moving thousands of mustangs to preserves in the Midwest and East to protect horse herds and the rangelands that support them.
Interior Department officials had warned that slaughtering some of the 69,000 wild horses and burros under federal control might be necessary to halt the rising costs of maintaining them, but Salazar said his plan avoids that.
Many horse defenders and others who had been working to save the romantic symbols of the American West and might have been expected to welcome Salazar's solution instead stampeded the other way. They want Salazar to remove livestock to make room for the mustangs and argue that cows are the real threat to the range and native wildlife.
"Any proposal to improve horse and burro management in the West should include removal of domestic livestock from public lands to make way for horses and burros and wildlife," said Mark Salvo of WildEarth Guardians based in Santa Fe, N.M. He said too much forage is allocated to livestock in the arid West.
Wildlife ecologist Craig Downer of Nevada accused Salazar, a former rancher, of acting on behalf of those who view mustangs as taking scarce forage away from their cattle herds. Downer contends cattle are more destructive to the range because they concentrate in high numbers around water sources instead of grazing over a wider area as wild horses do.
"Both the Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management have the right to remove livestock to ensure viable, healthy populations of wild horses. But they refuse to exercise that," Downer said. "Their master is primarily these traditional ranching interests."
BLM spokesman Tom Gorey said livestock grazing on the agency's lands has declined by about 50 percent since 1941, but the agency has no plans to reduce grazing levels further.
"Livestock grazing is an authorized use of the lands we manage," Gorey said. "We think we administer the rangeland laws appropriately within our multiple use mission."
Dan Gralian, president of the Nevada Cattlemen's Association, said livestock overgrazing no longer is the problem it once was and cattle don't cause more damage to the range than horses. He said 2.5 million to 3 million head of livestock graze on public lands, down from 20 million cows and 25 million sheep in 1900.
"My reaction is they (horse advocates) are totally wrong," Gralian said. "Our public lands today are in better shape than they've been in 100 years or so."
Federal land managers provide no count for the head of livestock grazing on about 250 million acres of public land. Estimates by conservation groups vary widely, ranging from 3 million to 8 million.
Chris Heyde of the Washington, D.C.-based Animal Welfare Institute said he believes little has changed since the release of a 1990 General Accounting Office report that branded livestock as the primary cause of degraded rangelands.
"People blame the horses, but if left on the ranges as they should be they're not destructive at all," he said.
About 37,000 wild horses and burros roam on 34 million acres in 10 Western states, about half in Nevada. An additional 32,000 of them are cared for in government-funded corrals and pastures.
The horses and burros are managed by the BLM and protected under a 1971 law enacted by Congress. But too few of the horses and burros are being adopted as had been envisioned. Soaring numbers of horses and costs to manage them that are expected to jump from $36 million last year to at least $85 million by 2012 have prompted Salazar to propose a new approach.
The BLM has set a target "appropriate management level" of 26,600 horses in the wild, about 10,000 below the current level. In 1971, there were 25,000 of the animals on the range.
Ginger Kathrens, executive director of the horse advocacy group Cloud Foundation based in Colorado Springs, Colo., urged Salazar to return mustangs to 19 million acres of land where they have been removed since 1971. She opposes his plan to open seven preserves, including two owned and operated by the BLM.
The agency would work with private groups on the remaining reserves, which would be located in the Midwest and East because of the West's scarce water and forage.
"It would seem that the best use of taxpayer dollars and the most humane plan for the nearly 32,000 wild horses in government holding would be to return them to their native lands," Kathrens said.
Gorey said mustangs were removed from 19 million acres where they were found in 1971 for various reasons, including a lack of water and forage.
The Public Lands Council, which represents public lands ranchers, supports the preserves as an important step in addressing growing horse populations, said Jeff Eisenberg, its executive director.
The seven preserves would hold about 25,000 horses. Many of the horses remaining on the range would be neutered and reproduction in Western herds would be strictly limited.
"It's important that we find a solution that provides for the welfare of horses without compromising the needs of ranchers who rely on grazing lands to produce food for America," Eisenberg said.
UI questions prof's attendance at bighorn meeting By JOHN MILLER - Associated Press Writer Published: 10/08/09
AddThis Share on Twitter Share on Facebook print story Comments (0) | Recommend (0)
BOISE, Idaho — The University of Idaho is looking into whether a professor violated terms of her paid leave while it investigates her claims of how bighorn sheep get deadly diseases.
The school is trying to determine what role Marie Bulgin, head of the UI's Caine Veterinary Teaching and Research Center, played at a Sept. 29 meeting of the Idaho Bighorn/Domestic Sheep Collaborative. State officials and wildlife groups said Bulgin introduced herself as a representative of the facility in Caldwell.
"Until we know more about those circumstances, we simply cannot speculate," Tania Thompson, a UI spokeswoman, said in an e-mail Thursday. "In the event that her attendance was in violation of her leave status with the university, it will be addressed as a personnel matter."
Since June, Bulgin has been on leave as the university investigates her testimony in federal court and the Idaho Legislature, where she insisted there was no proof bighorns can catch diseases from domestic sheep on the range. Evidence to the contrary has been collected by the Caine center's own researchers, including Bulgin's daughter, since at least 1994.
Bulgin was traveling and didn't immediately return a call seeking comment.
Conservation groups at the state-sponsored meeting, which was aimed at remedying conflicts between ranchers and bighorn sheep, said she introduced herself as a Caine representative.
"I was surprised by that," said Ken Cole, with Western Watersheds Project, a critic of Bulgin's work. "I thought she was on administrative leave."
Idaho sheep ranchers at the Boise meeting didn't immediately return calls seeking comment about Bulgin's role. Neither did Stan Boyd, director of the Idaho Wool Growers Association.
Idaho bighorn numbers have dwindled by half since 1990 to about 3,500 animals after several mass die-offs, making disease transmission the subject of fierce debate.
Bulgin, a former Wool Grower's Association president, been a lightning rod among wildlife scientists and conservation groups for her ardent ranching-industry support - and for denying evidence of disease transmission on the range.
Other scientists have accepted that bighorns can contract deadly lung diseases when they encounter domestic sheep in the wild, but ranchers fear efforts to prevent contact could put them out of business. The Payette National Forest north of Boise is considering closing domestic sheep grazing allotments in Hell's Canyon to protect bighorns.
In 1994, Caine center scientists including Jeanne Bulgin, Marie Bulgin's daughter, used DNA tests to determine parasites behind deadly pneumonia in two bighorns were identical to bacteria found in domestic sheep that had mixed with the wild animals.
Transmission "likely occurred between the species on the range," the Caine center then concluded.
Bulgin contends she didn't know of or suppress the Caine center studies, which were never published in wildlife journals.
The university in June began investigating after the media raised concerns about the integrity of research at an institution whose leader was closely affiliated with industry. On June 17, it released a statement that Bulgin would take administrative leave and not be involved in sheep-related projects "nor publish or otherwise disseminate research materials regarding sheep or sheep-related diseases."
Debate over Bulgin's meeting appearance last week marks another turbulent chapter in the Bighorn/Domestic Sheep Collaborative, called together by Gov. C.L. "Butch" Otter. Earlier this year, the Nez Perce tribe and some wildlife groups quit the effort, contending state leaders weren't serious partners.
They cited the 2009 Legislature's move to protect ranching by requiring Fish and Game officials to accept the risk of disease transmission in areas where ranchers had developed plans to separate the species.
------------------------------ ------------------------------ In this issue: * Update from the Field--U.S. Department of Agriculture Proposes "New Direction" in Brucellosis Managment * BFC Urgently Needs Your Vote in Charity Contest
* West Coast Roadshow Underway * Last Words * Kill Tally * Important Links
------------------------------ * Update from the Field
U.S. Department of Agriculture Proposes "New Direction" in Brucellosis Managment
The USDA's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), one of the agencies behind the slaughter of more than 3,600 wild bison in the past 10 years, published a paper on Monday announcing its intention to create a new set of rules regulating the management of brucellosis, the cattle disease upon which the bison slaughter is blamed.
"A Concept Paper for a New Direction for the Bovine Brucellosis Program" outlines several potential changes to the way the government deals with the livestock disease. APHIS is accepting comments on the paper until December 4th. BFC is currently reviewing the paper and we will provide more detailed information and suggested talking points for public comments in our next Update from the Field.In the meantime, if you would like to read the document for yourself, you can find it here or by pasting the link at the end of this paragraph into your browser.Please feel free to email us with any questions, comments, or suggestions. http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480a26
------------------------------ * BFC Urgently Needs Your Vote in Charity Contest
Currently in 26th place with 1,318 votes, BFC needs a big rally from our supporters if we are to take home a prize in the Christie Cookies $25,000 Charity Contest, which ends next Thursday, October 15 at 11:59 p.m. Central Time.
We need to finish in the top 12 to win one of the grants, which at this point would require an additional 2,140 votes.With nearly 8,000 bison advocates on our email list, you would think we could do it, but so far most of you haven't taken the time to cast a vote for BFC, the only grassroots group working to defend America's wild bison.
Even if you have voted, PLEASE take a moment and copy this portion of the Update to your friends, family members, co-workers, and acquaintances.Tell them why Yellowstone, the bison, and BFC are important to you, and ask them to take a moment to cast a vote for Buffalo Field Campaign today.
The process takes less than two minutes and has the potential to make a big difference for the bison.
------------------------------ * West Coast Roadshow Underway: Sacramento, Berkeley, San Jose, and Pasadena Remain
BFC's annual West Coast Roadshow has been running strong since the beginning of October.BFC co-founder Mike Mease and an evolving crew of musicians, writers, and storytellers have been entertaining, informing, and activating audiences from Briceland to Chico since the beginning of the month.After a show tonight in Sacramento, the tour will head to the Bay area before wrapping things up in southern California next week.
"Eradicating brucellosis in the GYA remains the long-term goal..." --from USDA APHIS' paper "A Concept Paper for a New Direction for the Bovine Brucellosis Program" released 10/5/2009
Do you have submissions for Last Words? Send them to bfc-media@.... Thank you all for the poems, songs and stories you have been sending; you'll see them here!
------------------------------ * Kill Tally
AMERICAN BISON ELIMINATED from the last wild population in the U.S. 2008-2009 Total: 22
The Bureau of Land Management has proposed two more oil and gas leases in Adobe Town, in the northern end of the citizens' proposed wilderness just south of "checkerboard" lands where private and public parcels are intermixed dating back to the Union Pacific railroad land grant. The lease sale also contains a number of parcels in sensitive sage grouse and big game habitats, to be offered without conservation measures that might otherwise reduce or prevent impacts, and BCA has objected to these as well. We are hopeful that the Adobe Town parcels may be deferred and not offered for sale at least until an analysis of scenic qualities, promised under the new Rawlins Resource Management Plan, has been performed for the area.
SUBMIT YOUR FAVORITE SHOT TO THE RED DESERT PHOTO SHOW BCA's Annual Red Desert Photo Show will open on November 15, 2009 at the Grounds Internet Cafe in Laramie, Wyoming.
Interested photographers should submit their work at the BCA office, 215 S 3rd St., Suite 114 in Laramie no later than 5pm, November 6, 2009. Photographs depicting subjects in Wyoming's Red Desert and will be entered in either the Landscape category or the Wildlife and Wildflowers category. Photographs will be entered in the Professional Division for those who have previously sold their work, or in the Amateur Division for those who have not.
Prizes will be awarded for first, second, and third place in each Division and category at a reception on Saturday, November 21, 2009. Photos will be judged by Michael Stoesz, owner of Laramie Digital Photo, as well as a People's Choice award by a vote of attendees.
Submitted photos should be framed and ready to hang, with matting recommended. A fee of $5 per entry will be waived for photographers younger than 18 years of age. Photos can be offered for sale to the public during the contest and show. Sale proceeds will be split between the photographer and BCA's Red Desert conservation campaign.
Call 307-742-7978 for more info.
FEDS: GREEN RIVER DOESN'T HAVE ENOUGH FOR MILLION
BCA has been carefully monitoring and organizing Wyoming residents against the big straw water grab. BCA is working with allies in Colorado and is a member of the Colorado Environmental Coalition's Water Caucus. We have gathered over 1,200 signatures of southwest Wyoming residents against the pipeline and BCA Executive Director and Laramie City Councilor, Erik Molvar, sponsored a resolution opposing the project which was passed unanimously by Council.
The project as originally proposed is in trouble. A U.S. Bureau of Reclamation study found that only up to 165,000 acre feet of water could be drawn from the Flaming Gorge Reservoir each year through 2049 while still allowing enough water to generate hydro power and to meet the needs of Endangered fish species downstream. Private businessman Aaron Million has proposed diverting 250,000 acre feet on an annual basis to Colorado's Front Range. Since water pipelines need to be full or nearly full to move the water, the question is, is this enough water for a pipeline? The answer seems to be "no."
CONGRATS, GYC! ENDANGERED GRIZZLIES PROTECTED AGAIN
Thanks to a lawsuit by Greater Yellowstone Coalition, the grizzly bear is once again enjoying the security of Endangered Species Act protection. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service had removed the grizzly from protection without considering the potential impacts of climate change. Grizzlies need whitebark pine nuts to fatten up for their long winter snooze, but whitebark pines are getting scarcer due to warming temperatures. The grizzly has a greater chance of survival as a species in the long run because of you, GYC. Thanks, and congratulations!
THANK YOU, BOB STRAYER, FOR MAKING THE DIFFERENCE!
Volunteers deserve enormous credit for making the Badger Ball happen, especially Bob Strayer, who rearranged his schedule to be there, set up, cleaned up and donated his professional photography to the auction! This is in addition to repainting the BCA office, and having served on our board for many years, not to mention his other volunteer commitments and responsibilities as a granddad. Bob is a dedicated person with a deep passion for the environment, who has blessed BCA with his labor and expertise for more than a decade. Native wildlife can't thank Bob for helping, but we can. On behalf of staff, members and board: thank you, Bob! You make a great difference. For more information about volunteer opportunities with BCA, please email sarah@....
BADGER BALL EDUCATES, RAISES $, RECOGNIZES SERVICE
On Saturday, September 19, BCA celebrated our Badger Ball and Annual Meeting at the Train Depot in Laramie, Wyoming. The keynote speaker, Dan Luecke, Ph.D., a hydrologist and environmental scientist, addressed many problems with the proposed Million Water Pipeline Project. The project would divert 250,000 acre feet of water annually from the Flaming Gorge and Green River and deliver this water to Colorado's Front Range communities. Dr. Luecke's address established that there is no need and very little support for this project in Colorado and that such a serious draw down of water from the reservoir and river would have disastrous results for the four species of endangered fish and the trout and salmon fishery.
Memberships, dinners and the silent auction raised $2,400 for wildlife and wilderness protection!
Also at the event, Kenneth Peterson was honored with the J. Michael Oxley Memorial Volunteer of the Year Award for his significant service to BCA's mission in the form of Information Technology assistance.
Many thanks to the Badger Ball's sponsors and donors: Altitude Chophouse & Brewery, Bath and Body Works, C.J. Box, Citrus Salon, Margaret Coel, Coal Creek Coffee, Corona Village Cost Cutters, Critter Sitter, Cross Country Connection, Denver Zoological Gardens, David Egolf, Jamie Egolf, Sarah Egolf, Enterprise Car Rentals, Fortune Valley Hotel and Casino, Darcy Gardiner & TEEWINOT Australian Shepherds, Gem City Veterinary Services, Great West & Frame Plant, High Plains Outdoors Institute, The Hilton Garden Inn, Hydro Hounds, Jeff Kessler, Mark Jenkins, The Jeweler, Laramie Digital Photo Center, Lincoln Printing, Linda Lillegraven, The Lodge Casino, The Mandarin Restaurant, Carmi McLean, Erik Molvar, Mary Lou Morrison, Fran Myers, Nails Tech, North Ridge Discount Liquors, Pansy's Parlor, The Pet Pantry, Kenneth Peterson, Chip Rawlins, Saratoga Inn, Duane Short, Rebekah Simon-Peter, Staples, Bob Strayer, Sweet Melissa's Vegetarian Cafe, Tommy Jack's Cajun Restaurant, VDR Volvo, Vee Bar Guest Ranch, Visions Hair Salon, and Winger's.
We couldn't have done it without our wonderful volunteers: Bob Strayer, Kenneth Peterson, Perry Wechsler and Jean Palfrey
Early this morning, the Center for Biological Diversity sued the Arizona Game and Fish Department to prevent it from capturing or killing any more endangered jaguars. The suit seeks to prevent another tragedy like the killing this spring of Macho B, the last known American jaguar. Arizona Game and Fish illegally set up mountain lion snares in the canyon Macho B was known to use without seeking a permit from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Macho B was subsequently snared, almost certainly on purpose, and later killed. In a callous response, Game and Fish not only claimed the lion-trapping study had a valid permit, it said it also has a permit to purposefully capture and collar jaguars. It does not.
Our suit will end the agency's flouting of federal wildlife laws once and for all. It will ensure that no state actions or permits are allowed that could threaten jaguars without full, proper, and enforceable limitations that come with federal Endangered Species Act permits.
Disastrous Development of Potential Park Stopped: Thanks for Helping
Last week Brightstar Energy listened to the detailed opposition of the Center for Biological Diversity's lawyers and scientists -- and thousands of supporters like you who sent emails -- and withdrew its plans for a controversial solar-energy project that would have taken up some 5,000 acres of pristine, ecologically critical California lands on their way toward national monument status.
The Center for Biological Diversity applauds the project's withdrawal: While a rapid transition to renewable energy is essential, pristine public lands don't need to be sacrificed. Mapping and analysis by the Center identifies more than 100,000 acres of degraded lands in the California desert where solar projects would have minimal environmental impact. That's where development should be directed, not in a potential national monument.
Read more on the solar project in ecofactory.com and take action to make sure its former site indeed becomes a national monument.
Murkowski Clean Air Act Killing Rider Killed: Thanks Again
Though nothing is final till it's final, it appears that Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) has lost her attempt to attach a rider to the EPA budget bill prohibiting the agency from using the Clean Air Act to rein in greenhouse gas pollution from coal-fired power plants and other industrial facilities. Buried under an avalanche of protests -- including thousands of letters from Center for Biological Diversity members and supporters -- the Senate has agreed not to allow the Murkowski amendment.
Stay tuned for more last-minute attempts to gut the Clean Air Act and prevent the Obama administration from taking decisive action on global warming. Republican pollution pushers and blue-dog Democrats are pushing on every front in Congress to keep coal, oil, gas, and inefficient cars rolling along.
Feds Listen, Float Plan to Address Bat Extinction Spiral
Responding to calls from the Center for Biological Diversity, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has drafted a plan to address the deadly bat disease white-nose syndrome. Over the past three winters, the mysterious syndrome has killed about 1.5 million bats in the eastern United States, spreading from New York to Tennessee with devastating speed. Earlier this month, the Center wrote to the Fish and Wildlife Service requesting faster, more coordinated action on the crisis; we've also contacted the Department of the Interior and Congress -- with not a little help from our supporters. The final plan should provide specific guidance for state wildlife agencies on how to respond to white-nose syndrome, as well as measures to help the recovery of stricken bat species.
Get the latest on white-nose syndrome mortalities from Valley News.
Tejon Ranch Condor Battle Nearing Final Stages
This month, California's Kern County Planning Commission gave its blessing to Tejon Mountain Village, a sprawling city planned for the state's beautiful and biodiverse Tejon Ranch. The proposed 26,417-acre project would build 3,450 homes and up to 160,000 square feet of commercial development smack in the middle of federally protected habitat for the endangered California condor. Some environmental groups have agreed to allow the destructive project in exchange for leaving other parts of the ranch undeveloped. But the Center for Biological Diversity is standing up for the condor and the irreplaceable Tejon lands it calls home. We've challenged the ranch's request for a permit to build the city without adequate environmental review, and we won the disclosure of documents on the condor's fate on the ranch, which the ranch was keeping secret. Eight of the country's most prominent condor experts agree that a sprawling development won't fly in condor habitat.
Clearcutting Carbon Credits? Not If We Can Help It
This Monday the Center for Biological Diversity and allies submitted a letter countering a proposed rule that would encourage clearcutting as good for the climate -- instead of the very obvious opposite. One provision of the rule, up for adoption by the California Air Resources Board later this month, appears intended to let forest clearcutting qualify as a greenhouse gas reduction method and earn carbon credits. Of course, a forest clearcut is about as beneficial to the climate as a new coal-fired power plant, considering the ample greenhouse gases emitted in the clearcutting process -- plus the fact that clearcutting removes precious CO2-absorbing trees.
Fighting Warming: Obama Vows to Deliver, You Already Have
This Tuesday during Climate Week -- the precursor to the United Nations' upcoming climate summit in Copenhagen -- President Barack Obama said he's willing to work to help the UN secure a strong international climate change pact. Obama called for world leaders to draft a response to global warming by the end of the year, citing his own administration's attempts to address the crisis, including House passage of the American Clean Energy and Security Act. The Center for Biological Diversity congratulates Obama on promising to "boldly, swiftly" help the world confront climate change. But we'll have to do a lot better than the inadequate House-passed bill -- we must get to work now, both nationally and internationally, to reduce our atmospheric CO2 to 350 ppm or below.
It's a good thing the planet has Endangered Earth readers out there already working to stave off the worst environmental disaster of our time. Last week, 177 of you sent in some amazing examples of smart things you've done to help the earth in response to our The Age of Stupid contest, from writing to Congress for a strong climate bill to installing solar panels to saving a freshwater wetland. (One reader was a little less ambitious, but we still appreciate his words: "Something smart I do is subscribe to your emails.") Readers, we're impressed.
Birding Tour to Help Environmental Justice, Honor Lost Leader
Last June marked the tragic passing of Luke Cole, one of the most influential figures in the environmental justice community. Founder and director of the Center for Race, Poverty, and the Environment, Cole was also a board member for the Center for Biological Diversity's Climate Law Institute. His work was among the first to highlight global warming as an environmental justice issue of massive proportions.
Cole was also an avid birder. So to celebrate his life and raise money for the Center for Race, Poverty, and the Environment, this weekend his friends will participate in and host a birding tour across Cole's home state of California to identify 400 bird species in 58 counties, from the great gray owl to the yellow-footed gull.
Rattlesnake Roundups Leading to Diamondback Demise
According to a sobering recent study, rattlesnake-killing contests have dangerously reduced populations of eastern diamondback rattlesnakes in the Southeast. "Rattlesnake roundups" are contests in which hunters bring in as many snakes as they can catch in a year to be milked for venom, butchered, and sold for meat and skin. The study, by Dr. Bruce Means, analyzed the number and size of snakes turned in at the roundups and found that both the total number of snakes and the size of each snake turned in have declined in the past 50 years. Eastern diamondback rattlesnakes, once a common species, are now being pushed toward extinction by hunting, habitat loss, and road mortality.
With several thousand votes in, global warming denier Senator James Inhofe is leading the pack to win the 2009 Rubber Dodo Award for the individual who has done most to drive endangered species extinct. Close behind are Michael Winer, who is trying to put up a massive housing development in essential condor habitat at Tejon Ranch, and Idaho Governor Leroy "Butch" Otter, who salivates at the thought of shooting wolves.
We've gotten write-in votes for Gale Norton (old news), Sarah Palin (won it last year), Ken Salazar (maybe next year if he keeps following Bush policies), and most surprisingly, Stephen Colbert. A suspiciously large number of voters wrote in Colbert due to a feigned hatred of polar bears and a boast a few days ago that he wanted to "hunt a spider to extinction" because it was named after David Bowie.
If you haven't voted yet, do it today -- the award will be announced soon.
Extinction is serious business, and so is this award. So we're asking Colbert voters out there to consider the destruction advocated by Inhofe, Winer, Otter, and others.
Saved More Land Than Jesus? Thanks...I Think
In an interview in today's Tucson Weekly, famed environmental writer Chuck Bowden answered the question of who the best local environmental group is this way:
"The Center for Biological Diversity has saved more ground than Jesus. I often don't agree with them, but their record is better than mine. When I'm dead, and when everybody reading this is dead, the only thing that matters is ground."
OK then.
Kierán Suckling Executive Director
Photo credits: jaguar courtesy Wikimedia Commons/Pascal Blachier under the Creative Commons attribution license; jaguar courtesy Wikimedia Commons/Cburnett under the GNU free documentation license; desert tortoise by Beth Jackson, USFWS; power plant by Phillip J. Redman, USGS; Indiana bat (c) J. Scott Altenbach, Maryland Department Of Natural Resources; California condor courtesy Wikimedia Commons/Chuck Szmurlo under the GNU free documentation license; logging courtesy Wikimedia Commons/Jastrow under the GNU free documentation license; solar panels courtesy Wikimedia Commons/Ceinturion under the Creative Commons attribution license; great gray owl courtesy Wikimedia Commons/BS Turner HOf under the GNU free documentation license; eastern diamondback rattlesnake courtesy Wikimedia Commons/Tad Arensmeier under the Creative Commons attribution license; rubber dodo award; Colorado River by Michelle Harrington.
This message was sent to lwalker@....
The Center for Biological Diversity sends newsletters and action alerts through DemocracyinAction.org.
Famous country and western singer Merle Haggard is no friend of his local cattle ranchers-
“The thing that bothers me the most is the recklessness and greed of the local ranchers, who run too many cattle back here, choking with waste the creek that runs through my property. There’s certain times of day that the cowboys like to send them turds down the river. Them fuckers piss me off. if you gotta mess up the ecology of the world in order to raise a bunch of cows, well eat somethin else. I’m not a fan of the cowboys.” - Merle Haggard, Rolling Stone, 10/1/09
BILLINGS, Mont. — A federal judge in Montana says the government must restore protections for an estimated 600 grizzly bears in and around Yellowstone National Park, citing a decline in their food supply caused in part by climate change.
Grizzlies lost their status as a threatened species under the Endangered Species Act in spring 2007.
On Monday, U.S. District Judge Donald Molloy in Missoula sided with environmental groups who argued in a lawsuit that the bear population remained at risk even after bouncing back from near-extermination last century.
Molloy cited a decline in whitebark pine trees — a key food source for many bears that has been disrupted by climate change — forest fires and other factors.
I'm today announcing an Internet-radio interview I did with Caryn Hartglass, Executive Director of EarthSave International. Caryn interviewed me back in July, but due to summer distractions, I thought it better to wait until now to make the announcement.
Among the interviews that I've done since publication of book, this one is unique in a few ways. It's longer than most--a full hour. Caryn and I had no communication in advance of the interview about the questions that she'd ask me. And most of the interview is NOT about my book Western Turf Wars.
In examining the roster of guests that Caryn has interviewed for her show since last spring, I have to say that among them I'm fairly exceptional in the type of activist that I am. Most of her other guests are educators, authors, and motivational speakers. Basically, they're activists who are trying to change the world one person at a time. In contrast, the field of activism within which I've worked since 1997 really only has a political solution. And what public education I've done has always been for the purpose of laying the foundation for political change. My "unsugarcoated" answers to Caryn's questions reflect the hard realities of my personal experiences.
And, of course, my having written Western Turf Wars was probably a major reason why Caryn asked me to do the interview. So, please check out the book's website: <http://westernturfwars.com>.
Comments about my interview? Email me at mailto:mikehudak@....
Fulfilling a court order won by the Center for Biological Diversity, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service yesterday formally put the Great Lakes wolf back on the endangered species list. This marks the third time the Center has overturned premature decisions to declare the Great Lakes wolf "recovered" and allow state agencies to kill them.
A court order in our case to return Rocky Mountains wolves to the endangered list and stop their killing could be issued any day. Meanwhile in the Southwest, the Fish and Wildlife Service is conducting a review of the Mexican gray wolf recovery program in response to our petition asking that the program be reformed from top to bottom.
To save the endangered Florida panther from a sea of encroaching sprawl, the Center for Biological Diversity today submitted a scientific petition to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service seeking the designation of 3 million acres of protected critical habitat.
While the human population in Florida has soared to 18 million people, the majestic cat has declined to just 100-120 individuals ringed by roads, shopping malls, and housing developments. It was saved from extinction by being placed on the endangered species list in 1967, but its habitat has never been protected and the species is leagues away from recovery.
"There is a very small window of opportunity to save the panther," said Michael Robinson of the Center for Biological Diversity. "If we don't map out and permanently protect all lands necessary for the great cat's survival and recovery immediately, it will go the way of the dusky seaside sparrow and Caribbean monk seal -- two Florida species that went extinct in our lifetime."
Obama to Limit Auto Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Raise Gas-mileage Bar
In a historic step toward cleaner energy, this Tuesday two federal agencies announced details of the first national plan to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from cars, light trucks, and SUVs under the Clean Air Act -- in fact, the first national plan to regulate these emissions period. Together, those three classes of vehicles emit almost 60 percent of U.S. transportation-related greenhouse gas emissions; according to the Environmental Protection Agency, the new plan would reduce greenhouse gases by 950 million metric tons and save some 1.8 billion barrels of oil over these vehicles' lifetime. The plan also increases the vehicles' national gas-mileage standards by about 5 percent per year, with the standard reaching 35.5 mpg for model year 2016. The move comes after the Center for Biological Diversity and allies won a landmark 2007 court victory overturning the Bush administration's ridiculously lax fuel-economy standards for model years 2008-2011. Still, the standards proposed by the new plan fall far short of what Europe, Japan, and China have in place already.
Thanks to a lawsuit by the Center for Biological Diversity and allies, this Monday the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals struck down a massive land trade that would have turned 11,000 acres of public land over to the infamous Asarco corporation to mine without regard for federal environmental laws.
The Bureau of Land Management had agreed to trade the public lands for 7,300 acres of private land so the company could expand its already massive Ray Copper Mine in Arizona. The appeals court, however, agreed the trade was "arbitrary and capricious," saying the agency should take a "hard look" at the environmental impact.
Thanks to opposition by the Center for Biological Diversity and more than 23,000 of you supporters, the Bureau of Land Management last Friday paused its plan to move 1,000-plus endangered desert tortoises. Hundreds of tortoises died during a relocation effort last year to make way for the expansion of the Fort Irwin Army base. The Center stopped last year's project with a lawsuit, but this year was able to save the tortoises by mobilizing thousands of people to protest. Thanks to all of you who wrote emails and made calls.
Unfortunately, Fort Irwin plans on ignoring the Bureau's decision and wants to move 90 desert tortoises this month, if it can get U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service approval. Stay tuned for more Mojave machinations.
Top Climate Scientists: 350 ppm or Doom for Climate, Oceans
As we approach the upcoming United Nations meeting in Copenhagen to strike an international climate treaty, some of the world's most prominent scientists are warning that current climate bills are insufficient to stop runaway global warming. Setting a goal of increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide to 450 or 550 parts per million, as the bill passed by the U.S. House of Representatives would do, will have catastrophic impacts. We need to decrease the level to 350 ppm or less. It's currently at about 385 ppm.
Rajendra Pachauri, chairman of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, told the press last week that "what is happening, and what is likely to happen, convinces me that the world must be really ambitious and very determined at moving toward a 350 target." Meanwhile, a United Nations project to quantify the financial costs of climate change on nature concluded that current climate targets aren't enough to save the world's coral reefs. "There's evidence that current levels of CO2 are already causing damage to reefs," said Alex Rogers of London's Institute of Zoology. "Stabilizing at anything more than about 350 ppm will lead to further destruction, and really we need to be aiming for zero emissions."
The Center for Biological Diversity is pushing hard to improve the deeply flawed climate bill and convince political leaders to let scientists rather than industry lobbyists guide national and international climate policy. Our community letter to the Senate, urging senators to set a 350 ppm target in the upcoming Senate global warming bill, has been endorsed by more than 350 organizations and is being personally delivered to senators nationwide. We're also gearing up for an exciting project for 350.org's International Day of Action on October 24 -- and we want you to be a part of it, so stay tuned.
Verizon Wireless has finally responded to the Center for Biological Diversity and CREDO's massive mobilization campaign calling on the company to withdraw its sponsorship of the Labor Day rally supporting mountaintop-removal coal mining, denying global warming, and attacking environmentalists as "extremists."
Eighty-one thousand email complaints later, Verizon wrote the Center to say its rally sponsorship was "not an expression of support for mountaintop removal coal mining or in opposition to climate legislation." Unfortunately, the not-so-apologetic apology was issued after the rally was over. And the Center isn't about to ease up on holding Verizon to its stated environmental responsibilities. Over the last three weeks, dozens of national articles and blogs about Verizon's rally support -- and the threats to endangered species and our planet from destructive coal mining -- have kept the media buzzing.
And the latest buzz is about asking our grassroots base, which pays our phone bills: Should we dump Verizon and find a more environmentally responsible phone company?
Vote today -- the polls close on Friday. And tell your friends to vote, too. We want Verizon to know that tens of thousands of potential customers are watching them closely and letting their opinions be known.
Facing a Center for Biological Diversity lawsuit and 250-plus species languishing without protection, the Obama administration has finally promised to put the "candidate list" backlog on the front burner. Essentially a waiting list for species in need of Endangered Species Act protection, the candidate list contains species that have been found to merit protection but were punted aside due to "higher priority" federal actions. Nearly 100 species have been on the list for more than a decade and 73 have been waiting for more than a quarter-century. A Center report shows that between 1974 and 1994, systematic delays -- including lengthy waits on the candidate list -- contributed to the extinction of 83 plants and animals. To prevent the extinction of more, in 2005 the Center sued the Bush administration to protect 283 candidate species.
Now, the Obama administration has said it will boost funding for the federal endangered species program and will use new techniques, like protecting numerous ecosystem-sharing species at a time, to ramp up protections for the 251 current species-in-waiting. But new techniques and money won't fix the problem if the administration isn't truly committed to protecting species. Let's hope it has its priorities straight.
Nominate Your Favorite Eco-Villain for the Rubber Dodo Extinction Award
It's time to hand out the Rubber Dodo Award to the person who's done the most to drive imperiled species extinct in 2009. The 2008 award went to former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin for taking potshots at polar bears, beluga whales, walruses, and any other endangered species that walked, crawled, or flew in her direction. The 2007 award went to Interior Secretary Dirk Kempthorne for setting a new record in failing to protect any endangered species at all for two years.
Who'll win the dubious honor in 2009? Help us decide by voting for one of our picks, or nominate your own favorite eco-villain. Here are our top four candidates:
- Don Blankenship, CEO of Massey Energy - Michael H. Winer, portfolio manager of Third Avenue Real Estate Fund (TAREX) and leader of Tejon development - Idaho Governor Butch Otter - Oklahoma Senator James Inhofe
Photo credits: Florida panther courtesy USFWS; gray wolf courtesy USFWS; Florida panther by Larry Richardson, USFWS; exhaust pipe courtesy Wikimedia Commons/Steevven1; bighorn sheep courtesy Corel Corporation, USFWS; desert tortoise by Beth Jackson, USFWS; elkhorn coral (c) John Easley, DeepSeaImages.com; mountaintop removal site courtesy Wikimedia Commons/JW Randolph; Oregon spotted frog by Kelly McAllister, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife; rubber dodo.
This message was sent to lwalker@....
The Center for Biological Diversity sends newsletters and action alerts through DemocracyinAction.org. Let us know here if you'd like to change your email list preferences or stop receiving action alerts and newsletters from us. Change your address or review your profile here.
If you received this message from a friend, you can sign up for Endangered Earth.
Verizon Wireless Faces Ire Over Mountaintop Removal Rally
Currently, Verizon Wireless is cosponsoring a pro-mountaintop-removal, anti-climate, anti-union Labor Day rally -- and the Center for Biological Diversity is leading a pressure campaign to compel a quick about-face. Massey Energy's "Friends of America" rally, to be held atop a former surface mine in West Virginia next Monday, will cheer for the devastating practice of mountaintop-removal coal mining, which blows up mountains and chokes waterways with debris in Appalachian habitat. The rally, organized by coal giant Massey Energy, will guest-star global warming denier Lord Christopher Monckton, and boasts an on-site anti-climate legislation petition to sign. Further, the rally's Web site homepage shockingly features the company's CEO on video accusing "environmental extremists" of destroying jobs by opposing mountaintop removal. (Meanwhile, the rally is competing with the nearby 71st annual United Coal Workers of America Labor Day celebration for attendees.)
But thanks to the Center's immediate leap into action and bold national grassroots campaign, Verizon Wireless may be losing more than a few of its 87 million customers: Thousands of them are asking, Can you hear us now? and pledging to spend their money with their conscience. On August 30, the Center notified Verizon Wireless' CEO in no uncertain terms that Verizon must withdraw support for the rally and mountaintop removal or we'd have to tell our 225,000 supporters why we left their pro-coal, anti-environmentalist, anti-union company. Now we've joined forces with CREDO Action, and in just three days our concerned citizens submitted 69,000 letters and made hundreds of phone calls to Verizon telling it to drop the rally.
Join us in commanding Verizon Wireless to withdraw its sponsorship and read more about our opposition in Advertizing Age. Help submit more than 100,000 letters by Labor Day -- join the cause on Facebook, tweet about Verizon, and learn why Grist magazine calls Massey's CEO "the scariest polluter in America" in this New York Times piece.
Responding to a Center for Biological Diversity lawsuit, this week the National Marine Fisheries Service finalized protection for 840,472 acres of watery habitat for the endangered smalltooth sawfish in southwestern Florida. The fish, a shark and ray relative with a cool-looking, saw-like snout, has declined by 95 percent due to historic overharvesting, entanglement in fishing gear (eased by its line-snagging proboscis), and now, the worst threat of all: extensive habitat loss. The fish earned a place on the endangered species list back in 2003 but was never given species-saving protected habitat, so we sued the Bush administration. The new habitat-protection rule, to take effect this October, means that federal agencies must consult with the Fisheries Service before approving any activity that could damage the protected area.
"Coastal development has been cutting away at the smalltooth sawfish's habitat," said Center Oceans Program Director Miyoko Sakashita. "New critical habitat protection will not only promote the recovery of the sawfish but also protect Florida's unique mangrove ecosystems."
Thanks to a lawsuit by the Center for Biological Diversity, last week the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service finally proposed protected habitat for California's rare San Diego ambrosia. The tenacious blue-gray herb, threatened by urban sprawl, agricultural expansion, off-road vehicle use, and other activities, was first protected under the Endangered Species Act in 2002 after a petition by the Center and allies. But due to political interference with endangered species decisions that ran rampant under the Bush administration, the plant was never granted federally protected habitat. Now, the Service has proposed to set aside 802 acres for the plant.
Unfortunately, that acreage covers only places where the ambrosia is currently found -- and its populations have declined dramatically from more than 50 to just 18, so it needs much more protected land. "This proposal is a step in the right direction," said Center biologist Ileene Anderson, "but designating only existing areas where the plant is found provides no chance for recovery, confining the species to a potential deathbed of extinction."
Last Friday, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service spared the Middle Fork pack of Mexican gray wolves from trapping or shooting, despite accounts that the wolves killed five cattle on the Gila National Forest. The pack consists of two three-legged adult wolves, who each lost a leg in privately set leg-hold traps, plus a yearling and four pups. These wolves live in a severely grazed area where five previous wolf families were trapped and shot by the feds to placate the livestock industry -- and where carcasses of cattle killed by non-wolf causes dot the landscape, tempting wolves and acclimating them to scavenging near grazing cows. This spring, Center for Biological Diversity volunteers found 16 dead cattle, none showing signs of wolf predation, within a few miles of the Middle Fork's den site.
In June, the Fish and Wildlife Service spared another Mexican wolf, from New Mexico's San Mateo Pack. Then, and now with the Middle Fork pack, the Arizona Game and Fish Department urged wolf removal, while its New Mexico counterpart supported keeping wolves in the wild. The Center is currently in court for wolves and just petitioned for better Mexican wolf protections. (Hmm, could our strong advocacy and media attention have anything to do with the federal government's newfound sensitivity toward these persecuted animals?)
The Environmental Protection Agency has taken a new step to use the Clean Air Act against climate change, proposing a rule that will spell out permitting thresholds for stationary greenhouse gas sources -- like coal-fired power plants -- under the Act. A proposal to reduce pollution from cars and trucks under the law is expected shortly, and should be finalized by March 2010. These proposals are yet more proof of the Clean Air Act's critical value and effectiveness in fighting global warming -- and the necessity of keeping its warming-fighting capabilities intact in any new climate legislation. To that end, the Center for Biological Diversity has now gathered the signatures of almost 350 groups on a letter to maintain existing Clean Air Act protections in the new climate bill being considered by the Senate. This week, community members will hand-deliver the letter to senators across the country.
"The Clean Air Act has protected the air we breathe for four decades and is our strongest existing tool for reducing greenhouse pollution," said Kassie Siegel, the Center's Climate Law Institute director. "The Obama administration should move quickly to reduce greenhouse pollution with these successful existing programs, and Congress must ensure that new federal climate legislation retains the Clean Air Act's critical safety net."
Check out our press release and take action yourself for a strong climate bill (more than 43,000 individuals already have).
Center to Feds: Act to Save Bats Now
With bat extinctions looming and 1.5 million bats already dead from white-nose syndrome, last week the Center for Biological Diversity requested immediate action from the new director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The mysterious syndrome, unknown to science before it popped up two winters ago in New York, now occurs in nine states and is still spreading swiftly; it could soon hit Kentucky and Tennessee, which house some of the largest bat colonies in the world. Many affected bat populations in New England and New York have already been reduced to 10 percent of their former numbers -- including the federally endangered Indiana bat. Our letter to the Service's director calls for a national white-nose syndrome plan that includes research priorities, a system for interagency coordination, a budget, and a plan for protecting bats (whether they're already known to be infected or not).
Second Suit Filed to Protect 2,600 Acres in Southern California
Last Thursday the Center for Biological Diversity, Preserve Wild Santee, and the Endangered Habitats League renewed a legal challenge to a sprawling development proposed for Fanita Ranch, located on the northern edge of Santee, California. A San Diego court scrapped plans for the 2,600-acre, 1,400-home project after our first lawsuit in 2008, finding that the city of Santee hadn't adequately considered the development's fire-safety risk when it approved the project. Now the city has approved the developer's "revised" plan, though it's hardly different from the first one. Luckily for human, plant, and wildlife communities near the Fanita Ranch site -- including populations of the federally protected Quino checkerspot butterfly and California gnatcatcher -- the development is also facing fiscal glitches and may not be feasible anyway. Still, we don't take chances when it comes to preventing catastrophic wildfire and habitat destruction.
To save a wildlife refuge from becoming another concrete jungle, last week the Center for Biological Diversity went to court to oppose development on California's March Stephen's Kangaroo Rat Preserve. Government documents show that the preserve is critical to the survival of the endangered Stephen's kangaroo rat, but in 2006 the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service decided to allow commercial and industrial development on the site in exchange for granting partial protection to other local lands. It's an unequal trade and will cause more harm than good, destroying essential habitat and wildlife linkages and ultimately threatening the integrity of a network of preserves in Riverside County.
"You can't trade wildlife preserves like stocks or flip them like Miami condos; the animals can't just pick up and move," said the Center's Jonathan Evans. "We owe it to future generations to uphold past promises to protect this land and stop paving over wildlife preserves."
Big Fish Lacking in Big Pond: Overpopulation Pushes Predators Out Of Caribbean
According to a sweeping study published in the journal PLoS One, the burgeoning human population could soon be swimming -- and fishing -- in shark-depleted waters (also barracuda-depleted, grouper-depleted, and depleted of most other large, predatory fish). The study, by researcher Chris Stallings of Florida State University, documents in detail the disturbing declines of marine predators on Caribbean coral reefs that occur alongside human population growth, jeopardizing the region's marine food web and ultimately its reefs and fisheries. It's not hard to grasp why: Stallings found that nations with more people have reefs with fewer large fish because, as the number of people increases, so does demand for seafood -- and bigger fish are usually fished first. Given that half the world's populations live near coastlines and those populations are growing faster than ever, demands for seafood will increase far beyond reefs' capacities unless we tackle the problem through multiple tactics -- including confronting overpopulation with family-planning strategies.
Get more on Stallings' study from the Environmental News Network and learn about overpopulation and oceans on our new Web page, where you can also read the Caribbean study. Then check out this CNN.com article on a family awaiting its 19th child.
Kierán Suckling Executive Director
Photo credits: Mexican wolf by Jim Clark, USFWS; mountaintop removal site courtesy Wikimedia Commons/JW Randolph; smalltooth sawfish courtesy Wikimedia Commons/Diliff under the GNU free documentation license; San Diego ambrosia (c) Jim Rocks; gray wolf by John and Karen Hollingsworth, USFWS; Navajo power plant courtesy USGS; white-nose syndrome by Ryan Von Linden, New York Department of Environmental Conservation; Quino checkerspot butterfly (c) Douglas Aguillard; kangaroo rat courtesy USFWS; barracuda courtesy NOAA.
"It is said that repeating the same action over and over and expecting a different result is a sign of mental deficiency. We wouldn't presume to apply that label to the Kane County Commission. But we hope that at some point the county will accept the fact that it has no authority to dictate rules for the use of public lands." Salt Lake Tribune, September 3, 2009
Dear friend:
In a major victory for Utah wilderness, on August 31 the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Utah’s Kane County may not override federal rules meant to protect wildlife, streams, archeological sites, wilderness and monuments by relying on unproven "highway" rights-of-way. The ruling came in response to a lawsuit filed by SUWA, Earthjustice and The Wilderness Society in October 2005.
In 2003, officials from Kane County ripped out signs posted by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) in the Grand Staircase Escalante National Monument. These signs were meant to keep motorists safe and protect sensitive areas
An illegally posted sign declares a Kane County "highway" open
from damage caused by off-road vehicles (ORVs). The county also attempted to buck federal authority by placing its own signs inviting ORV use in the very same places the BLM had prohibited it.
The court resoundingly rejected the county’s attempt to take the law into its own hands, reasoning that the county’s actions violated the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution. That clause provides that federal law supersedes local or state laws involving federal issues where the two conflict. The court also held that the county must first prove its right-of-way claims are valid before federal managers must accommodate them.
The county argues that it owns the routes under a Civil War-era law known as R.S. 2477. Although the law was repealed in 1976, any valid existing rights-of-way were honored or "grandfathered" in. In Utah alone, there are more than 10,000 R.S. 2477 county “highway” claims for primitive trails, cow paths and streambeds in national parks, forests, wilderness areas, and lands proposed for wilderness designation. However, with the support of activists like you, SUWA has successfully prevented validation of any R.S. 2477 claims within the more than 9 million acres proposed for wilderness under America's Red Rock Wilderness Act.
Thank you for helping us achieve this important victory!
Sincerely, The Staff at SUWA
PS: Would you like to become more involved in protecting Utah wilderness? Click here to sign up.
425 East 100 South, Salt Lake City, Utah, 84111 | 801-486-3161 | www.suwa.org
WWP Takes Decisive Action to Protect Wildlife and Public Lands Across the West ~ Jon Marvel
Friends,
Western Watersheds Project has relied on remarkably successful litigation as part of our mission to protect and restore western watersheds and wildlife. That reliance continues in 2009 with assistance from many attorneys including the staff at Advocates for the West in Boise and Earthjustice in Bozeman as well as WWP’s own excellent legal staff in Montana, Utah and Arizona.
With cases pending in Arizona, Colorado, Wyoming, Montana, Oregon, Washington and Idaho, WWP is putting federal and state agencies to judicial tests in courtrooms around the west.
When someone asks me if WWP’s legal efforts are too combative, I always ask them : What better way is there to make sure that our federal and state land and wildlife managers comply with the the statutes created by the Congress of the United States and signed by the President ?
Here then are some of WWP’s current legal efforts for everyone’s review. You can also read much more at WWP’s legal pages on the WWP web site.
WWP Litigates to Protect Chinook Salmon, Steelhead, and Bull Trout Lemhi River Watershed
The Lemhi River in central/eastern Idaho drains the Lemhi, Bitterroot and other mountains; and enters the Salmon River just north of the town of Salmon, Idaho. The Lemhi watershed provides habitat for three species of threatened fish: Snake River spring/summer Chinook salmon, Snake River steelhead, and Upper Columbia River bull trout. Endangered sockeye salmon migrate past the mouth of the Lemhi River in the Salmon River on their way between their spawning grounds in headwater lakes of the Salmon River and the ocean.
Livestock grazing on these public lands is a threat this ESA protected fishery.
WWP Takes Action to Protect Bighorn Sheep in Arizona
This action challenges a decision by the United States Forest Service to permit private livestock companies to drive approximately 8,000 domestic sheep across the Tonto and Apache Sitgreaves National Forests in August and September of 2009. The sheep would be herded from the Apache-Sitgreaves National Forest near Springerville, Arizona to the northeastern corner of the Tonto National Forest near Heber, Arizona, and then diagonally across the entirety of the Tonto National Forest to its southwestern edge near Mesa. The trip takes about a month to complete.
Domestic sheep cause a number of environmental impacts to vegetation, soil productivity, and water quality, but perhaps most important is the effect domestic sheep have on wild bighorn sheep. Domestic sheep carry disease that is fatal to wild bighorn, and transmission of disease from domestic sheep to wild bighorn sheep is a well-documented occurrence that has devastated many bighorn sheep populations in the American West.
WWP files suit to protect sage grouse, bull trout, and wilderness values on the Burnt Creek Allotment, Central Idaho Pahsimeroi River Watershed
The challenged grazing decision reissued a ten-year livestock grazing permit for the Burnt Creek allotment, which is within a Wilderness Study Area (WSA) and comprises almost 5,000 acres of important habitat for sage-grouse, bull trout, and many other species.
Livestock grazing has degraded this habitat and other resource values, yet BLM has refused to meaningfully modify grazing to address these degraded conditions. Instead, BLM has reauthorized status quo grazing and additional “range projects” for livestock, contrary to multiple provisions in its governing land use plan as well as governing direction on Wilderness Study Areas, and has refused to take a “hard look” at the environmental consequences of its actions.
WWP Ends the Bureau of Land Management's Unlawful Use of "Catagorical Exclusions" from Environmental Analysis throughout the West West-wide
WWP has successfully settled litigation brought against the Bureau of Land Management for its unlawful use of Categorical Exclusions (CEs/CXs) to authorize grazing, vegetation management and fuels reduction projects. BLM had used, and continues to use, Categorical Exclusions to avoid conducting appropriate environmental analysis of the impact its actions will have to the environment.
As part of the stipulated agreement, the Bureau of Land Management will halt its use of CEs for vegetation management, fuels reduction, and livestock grazing across the entire country and voluntarily withdraw over 15 previous decisions implemented under a CE.
Feds to Consider Sonoran Desert Tortoise for Endangered Species Act Protection Southwest
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) gave the green light today on a petition submitted by Western Watersheds Project and WildEarth Guardians requesting protection (listing) for the Sonoran desert tortoise under the Endangered Species Act. The finding means that the Service will now conduct a full review to determine if the tortoise warrants being placed on the list of threatened and endangered species.
Should a listing take place, many human intrusions into the desert tortoise’s southwest desert habitat, including livestock grazing and excessive development, will be largely halted. The benefit of such will be enjoyed by a great number of desert wildlife species.
WWP Litigates to Protect 250,000 acres of Colorado Rangeland, Canada Lynx, and endangered Ucompahgre Butterfly Arkansas River Watershed
WWP recently filed suit in Federal Court in Denver, Colorado to stop a 250,000 acre grazing project located on Colorado's Pike-San Isabel National Forest.
The grazing plans call for a continuation of historic grazing in the area, which even the Forest Service has acknowledged will harm water quality, range vegetation, wildlife habitat, and soil productivity beyond federal standards.
WWP & Conservation Partners Ask Judge to Enjoin the Federal Government's Removal of Endangered Species Act Protections for Northern Rocky Mountain Wolves Northwest
Monday, WWP and wolf-coalition partners argued in Montana District Court asking Judge Molloy to enjoin the federal government's delisting rule and re-instate federal protections for wolves while the merits of the case are heard.
For those interested in this case, WWP has made our legal filings available on the wolf page of WWP's website.
Western Watersheds Project Is A West Regional Conservation Organization Working To Protect And Restore Western Watersheds And Wildlife
Consider joining Western Watersheds Project yourself or enrolling a friend with a gift membership. Joining is easy at WWP's secure online membership page
Once again BCA is offering great items and getaways at great prices at its silent auction at the annual Badger Ball and Annual Meeting!
Date: Saturday, September 19, 2009
Place: Train Depot, 1st and Kearney, Laramie, WY
Time: 3:30 pm--Issue Workshops, 5:00 pm--Cocktail Hour, 6:30 pm--Dinner and Keynote Speaker, Dan Luecke Dr. Luecke is an expert on Western water issues and trans basin water consultant who will be speaking of the problems of the proposed Million Water Pipeline.
Cost: $25 per plate for members and their families $25 per plate plus $35 family membership for non-members KIDS EAT FREE!
A preview of just a few of the items and getaways up for bid;
A weekend of pet sitting, a $90 value starting at $40
Playing with the high rollers at one of Colorado's finest casinos, package includes a night for 2, all-you-can-eat buffet for two, and a rental car, a $125 value starting at $55
Autographed copies of the latest works of Wyoming's award winning mystery writers, C.J. Box and Margaret Coel, a $55 value starting at $20
Stay tuned for more silent auction teasers!
Space is limited. For reservations contact Carmi McLean at 307 742-7978 or carmi@...
Subject: Montana "brucellosis class-free" again; APHIS to consider new brucellosis strategy
BILLINGS, Mont. (AP) - A federal official says his agency is working with the three Yellowstone-area states to present a *new strategy *by early October for handling the livestock disease brucellosis.
Brian McCluskey is western regional director for the Animal Plant Health Inspection Service. He says a new plan for the disease will be put out for public comment before a meeting of the *U.S. Animal Health Association* that begins Oct. 7.
Brucellosis causes cattle and some wildlife to abort their young. It's been eradicated in livestock but persists in wildlife around Yellowstone National Park.
At a ceremony in Helena Tuesday, McCluskey presented Montana Gov. Brian Schweitzer with a certificate declaring the state free of the disease. Schweitzer credited livestock producers and the Department of Livestock for helping restore the state's disease-free status after it was lost in 2008.
THANKS FOR YOUR VOICE PROTECTING THE SNOWY RANGE SCENIC BYWAY!
Thanks to concerned citizens like you, the Forest Service received more than 200 letters requesting that they cease plans to put an off-road vehicle parking lot at the entrance to the only non-motorized network of ski trails in the Medicine Bow National Forest. If you're just now learning about the subject, BCA and many citizens have asked that the Forest Service either cancel the project altogether or re-locate the planned parking lot from Green Rock trailhead within the Libby Flats Roadless Area to Highway 230. In a Colorado off-road vehicle user group study, 75% self-reported that they knowingly go off designated trails. The Green Rock trailhead provides access to subalpine and alpine ecosystems which are vulnerable to off-road vehicle use that would be encouraged by the parking area. Besides, it is hard enough to visit the Medicine Bow in peace and quiet, and there is already a system of off-road vehicle trails accessible from Highway 230 where a new parking area would be less disruptive.
LARAMIE CITY & GOV DAVE OPPOSE MILLION PIPELINE
City Council & WY Governor Oppose Green River Water Grab On Tuesday, July 27, 2009, the Laramie City Council unanimously resolved to oppose the Aaron Million trans-basin water pipeline, citing concerns that it would harm recreation and fish habitat on the Green River system, promote the influx of invasive zebra and quagga mussels into the Laramie Valley, and threaten future water uses in this area. Shortly afterward, Wyoming Governor Dave Freudenthal came out publicly opposing the project as well. Million's pipeline would be astronomical in cost, reduce water quality and threaten native Endangered fish downstream of Flaming Gorge, namely the Colorado pikeminnow, bonytail, humpback chub and razorback sucker. The BCA staff is pleased to see people like you coming to public hearings to speak out about this bad idea. Thank you!
SAND CREEK PROTECTIONS DELAYED IN BLACK HILLS
The BCA staff was successful in securing a hearing with the Wyoming State Environmental Quality Council for the purposes of establishing whether our petition for protection of the Sand Creek Roadless Area in the Black Hills deserved consideration. The Council wanted to see more information on a few key aspects of the area before moving on to a full hearing, and BCA has updated the petition for a second go, with the goal of protecting the area from surface mining with a "Very Rare or Uncommon" state designation.
YOU'RE INVITED TO THE BCA BADGER BALL SEPT 19, 2009
Annual meeting, silent auction and keynote on Million Pipeline Please reserve the evening to enjoy the company of your fellow conservationists at the Train Depot in Laramie, WY, at the intersection of First and Kearney. Be regaled by hydrologist and trans-basin water diversion consultant to the Department of Justice, Dan Luecke, who will speak on the Million Water Project. The cost for entry is $25 per plate for members and their families, and $25 per plate plus a $35 membership for non-members. Kids eat free! Issue workshops will be held at 3:30pm, cocktail hour is 5pm, and dinner will be served at 6:30pm. We can't wait to see you!
GOV SAYS NO WIND TURBINES IN SAGE GROUSE CORE AREAS
Wyoming State Governor Dave Freudenthal has taken an uncharacteristically strong stand for sage grouse conservation in the context of wind energy development. While wind energy development is perfectly appropriate for many areas in the state, Freudenthal deserves a pat on the back for saying "no" in sage grouse core areas. Sage grouse abandon habitat where tall structures are present, be they oil and gas infrastructure, transmission poles, or wind turbines. More than five million acres of our state are great for wind energy, according to BCA's ground-breaking report, "Wind Power in Wyoming: Doing it Smart from the Start," but sage grouse core areas are not. Governor Dave has demonstrated that a backbone is better than a wishbone when it comes to protecting our natural resources.
CLEARCUT-HEAVY SPRUCE GULCH MOVES FORWARD IN MEDICINE BOW
Over the objections of BCA staff and people like you, who are concerned about the impact of salvage logging, the Forest Service has approved the Spruce Gulch logging project. Although a number of clearcut units in key lynx corridors were removed as a result of BCA staff advocacy, the project still includes a large number of clearcuts in beetle-affected stands around Pelton Creek, most of which are far away from any home or structure which could possiby benefit from fuel reduction for the prevention of fire. The logging will probably not begin until the summer of 2010 at the earliest, and there remains a good chance that in the absence of local timber mills, the proposed cuts will not find a buyer. That would be the best outcome for the health of a forest already struggling to recover from the effects of beetle kill.
Subject: WWP receives Excellent USFWS 90 Day Finding for the Sonoran Desert Tortoise
Friends:
Thanks to the hard work of WWP California Director Dr. Michael J. Connor, WWP’s joint petition with WildEarth Guardians to list the Sonoran Desert Tortoise under the Endangered Species Act has received a very favorable 90 Day Finding published in today’s Federal Register.
For your review I have attached a PDF file of the actual Federal Register Notice, a PDF file of the USFWS News Release and have included below the WWP-WildEarth Guardians News release.
Thank you Mike for this very good news !!
Jon
For immediate release: August 28, 2009
Contacts: Nicole Rosmarino, Ph.D., WildEarth Guardians, 505-699-7404, nrosmarino@... Michael Connor, Ph.D., Western Watersheds Project, 818-345-0425, mjconnor@...
Feds To Consider Tortoise for Endangered Species Act Listing Groups Applaud Finding for Rapidly Declining Desert Icon Arizona—Aug 28. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) gave the green light today on a petition submitted by WildEarth Guardians and Western Watersheds Project requesting protection (listing) for the Sonoran desert tortoise under the Endangered Species Act. The finding means that the Service will now conduct a full review to determine if the tortoise warrants being placed on the list of threatened and endangered species.
The Sonoran desert tortoise occurs in southwest Arizona and northern Mexico. The Service found that Sonoran desert tortoises qualify as a distinct population, different from other tortoises found in the Mojave Desert west of the Colorado River that were federally listed in 1990. The Service will also address a small desert tortoise population named in the groups’ petition that lives in the Black Mountains in northern Arizona in the status review.
“We are delighted with the Service’s initial response. Their findings are a strong indication that they are committed to using the best science available as they review the status of the Sonoran and Black Mountains desert tortoise populations. These populations have languished and declined since they were excluded from the 1990 listing. We expect that the Service’s detailed scientific review will show that listing is required to conserve these icons of the desert southwest,” stated Dr. Michael Connor of Western Watersheds Project and a twenty year advocate for desert tortoise protection.
The Service determined that the Sonoran desert tortoises may be threatened by all five factors the agency uses in deciding whether a species qualifies for Endangered Species Act protection: 1) habitat loss and destruction; 2) overutilization; 3) disease or predation; 4) inadequate legal protections; and 5) other factors. Under the Act, the tortoises needed to qualify under a minimum of just one of these factors. The full list of threats noted in today’s finding is long, including: habitat loss from livestock grazing, urbanization, border activities, off-road vehicles, roads, and mining; harm to individual tortoises from shooting, collection for pets or food, handling, and harassment; diseases such as upper respiratory tract disease, shell disease, and other pathogens; increased predation by ravens, coyotes, and feral dogs due to urban encroachment; inadequate legal protections, including on federal and state public lands; altered fire patterns due to exotic weeds; crushing and killing of tortoises by off-road vehicle users; and prolonged drought, exacerbated by the climate crisis.
“We applaud the Service for recognizing the broad suite of assaults facing the Sonoran desert tortoise. We will press the Service to take the next step and propose this rapidly declining desert dweller for Endangered Species Act protection,” stated Dr. Nicole Rosmarino of WildEarth Guardians.
The petition shows that monitored Sonoran desert tortoise populations have declined by 51 percent since 1987, or about 3.5 percent annually. This was based on an analysis of population trends in monitored areas throughout the animal’s range in Arizona conducted by independent scientists that was commissioned by WildEarth Guardians.
Because the initial finding on the petition is positive, the Service must now undertake a review of the status of the species and make a decision based on that review. If the tortoises are listed under the Endangered Species Act, they would be protected from “take” (including killing and harassment) of individual tortoises, and the agency would have to develop a recovery plan to map out the steps that must be taken to reverse the population declines. The Service must also identify habitat critical to the conservation and recovery of the species. With today’s finding, the Service announced the beginning of a 60-day public comment period during which additional information can be submitted by agencies and the public. The comment period ends on October 27.
Livestock grazing is a significant threat to the Sonoran desert tortoise. More than half of the tortoise’s estimated range in Arizona is on federal public land (8,406,692 acres) and more than half of that public land is permitted for livestock grazing (on more than 200 grazing allotments). Grazing is even permitted on important desert tortoise habitat in designated wilderness and in the Ironwood Forest and Sonoran Desert national monuments--areas purportedly established for conservation purposes.
The Sonoran desert tortoise has a number of characteristics that make it vulnerable to extinction. Tortoises do not reach sexual maturity until they are approximately 10-20 years old, and females produce only produce one clutch of eggs per year. Tortoise hatchlings have very soft shells, making them susceptible to predators and harsh weather. Tortoises depend on sufficient forage in a region that is heavily grazed by livestock and that is experiencing prolonged drought and effects of climate change. In today’s finding, the Service recognized the tortoises’ fragile existence, noting that the simple act of a human picking up a tortoise could cause the tortoise to urinate, which could jeopardize its life due to the resulting loss of water. Sonoran desert tortoises share their habitat with many other imperiled species, such as the lesser long-nosed bat and the cactus ferruginous pygmy owl, which would also enjoy benefits if this tortoise was listed under federal law.
WildEarth Guardians and Western Watersheds Project are conservation organizations with offices throughout the western United States, including in Arizona.