... From: Pete Hendrickson Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 5:13 PM Subject: "For want of a nail, a shoe was lost..." ...For want of a shoe the horse was lost. ...
A comment in defense of TI. TI is right you know, awhile back I spotted, in this fellow, (the alleged plagiarizer) the "parrot" he may be; caute cautim. One...
This motion was used in a trademark/trade dress case. The plaintiff’s attorneys neglected to inform the court of a related administrative case pending in the...
This “notice” was almost used in a trademark/trade dress case. Right before it was about to be filed, the corporate defendants obtained counsel and the new...
The habit of using language that is not of the norm as used by your own people is pretending to be what one is not. The Federalist papers were written using...
Yes, it's that time again. Time for a little "De-Motivation" to get you through yet another week. fyi: Each Wednesday we update the site with a new letter. We...
Ronald Weston how do you defend the ongoing civil losses of Pete Hendrickson, when at the same time you boast you write his merit less motions. Is it not a...
Interested in sharing everything about legal with other professionals? NEWS,JOBS,BLOGS,FORUM......Check out this for free: http://godknowsit.bravehost.com/...
Don't worry, Pete will not win, given the fact that his 0 tax return/0 wage argument is no different from all the other 0 tax return/0 wage arguments that...
It is different, his is in accordance with the law, i.e. the statutes behind IRC 6401(c), which can be traced back to 3770(c) of the IRC of 1939 that was added...
... statutes behind IRC 6401(c), which can be traced back to 3770(c) of the IRC of 1939 that was added by the Current Tax Payment Act of 1943, 57 Stat. 126. ...
It is not a change, and Pete's earnings in the private sector do not constitute "wages" as defined in the taxing statutes. It can't as it would violate the...
Yeah, like those arguments are new. Same old crap. Don't waste your time responding anymore unless you've got something that's never been argued before....
Keep being a dumb a*s then. Perhaps the reason so many keep losing is because they stupidly agree to being tried in a territorial court. But then you do not...
... is because they stupidly agree to being tried in a territorial court. But then you do not care about jurisdiction at all do you. Read the attached. ... oh,...
You are a pure socialist liberal. The reason he has won in the past is because he challenged it properly and they backed down. This time they are really...
Commerce is socialism. In commerce, everything is provided for you. In other words, don't say anthing, otherwise you'll rock the boat and your living may be...
The Federal income tax is not pursuant to art. 1, sec. 8, cl. 1. Congress is relying on its constitutional authority over its territory and other property...
The federal income tax is not pursuant to anything in the Constitution. Debt notes are liabilities and liabilities are non-taxable. End of story, so please...
As they say in computer la-la land: ROTFLMAO!! ... From: Marsox To: No-Income-Tax@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 2:20 PM Subject: [No-Income-Tax]...
REv 5 of ABC's of Government Theft is now online. THe following are the changes: a.. Included facts and impact of lumping 195 forms under a single OMB Number. ...
How terribly clueless you are! To say that Congress cannot lay and collect taxes within its territory and other property with the plenary authority given to...
You are reading into Art. 4 sec. 3 cl. 2. That article says Congress shall have Power to dispose of and make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the...
Press Release: 06.06.07 NY Times ... Do you *really* want to know the 'Psychology of the IRS' and the Insider Secrets of the Tax Audit Process? If so, then go...
The Supreme Court would appear to disagree with you: 21 S.Ct. 770, 182 U.S. 244, Downes v. Bidwell, (U.S.N.Y. 1901) That the power over the territories is...