Skip to search.

Breaking News Visit Yahoo! News for the latest.

×Close this window

MysticCrossing · Mystic Crossing / MVAST

The Yahoo! Groups Product Blog

Check it out!

Group Information

  • Members: 100
  • Category: Walking
  • Founded: Nov 22, 2003
  • Language: English
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Real people. Real stories. See how Yahoo! Groups impacts members worldwide.

Messages

Advanced
Messages Help
Messages 43 - 72 of 493   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Show Message Summaries Sort by Date ^  
#43 From: "Lisa Brukilacchio" <lisa.b@...>
Date: Wed Dec 10, 2003 2:20 pm
Subject: RE: Re: DMF interested
lisamystic1
Send Email Send Email
 
Any of us who have had the opportunity to visit the locks in Seattle, WA
share a vision of an interactive visual connection to the fish passage. I
may try to track down information on their set up as an example.

Lisa Brukilacchio

-----Original Message-----
From: Patrick [mailto:epdmarine@...]
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 9:13 PM
To: MysticCrossing@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [MysticCrossing] Re: DMF interested


I think that's a wonderful idea. Allowing the Dam to be a destination
as wellas ameans of crossing the river!


--- In MysticCrossing@yahoogroups.com, "Robert Mela" <r.mela@c...>
wrote:
> Just a random idea on fish passage --
>
> my 2-1/2 year old is a great fan of the little fishies.  It occurred
> to me that the dam would be one of the few places where human and
fish
> passages very nearly intersect.
>
> If there's sufficient fish traffic and visibility to make such a
thing
> interesting, it'd be fun to provide a window into the fish passage.
> It could be optical fiber and lenses, or a sonar/fish counter.   If
> that's not practical, or there isn't fish activity to make it
> interesting, then heck, just some signage w. a couple of pictures
> would let folks know about interesting goings-on in the river below.
>
>
> --- In MysticCrossing@yahoogroups.com, APhelps@c... wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > As some of you know, my speciality is "fishes."  Brad, Todd, etc.,
> please
> > call me if there is anything specific I can do to help with
getting
> better
> > fish passage on the lower Mystic!
> >
> > Anne
> >



To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
MysticCrossing-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

#44 From: Lanny Evarts <evarts.lan@...>
Date: Thu Dec 11, 2003 4:03 am
Subject: Re: Re: DMF interested
evarts.lan@...
Send Email Send Email
 
Lisa and all,

I'm from Seattle.  The locks are a wonderful destination very popular and
economically profitable for the neighborhood.  We always took our
out-of-town visitors there for a unique experience.  I've been advocating
quietly for Erhart to be open to the public since moving here.

Lanny Evarts

> From: "Lisa Brukilacchio" <lisa.b@...>
> Reply-To: MysticCrossing@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 09:20:21 -0500
> To: <MysticCrossing@yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: RE: [MysticCrossing] Re: DMF interested
>
> Any of us who have had the opportunity to visit the locks in Seattle, WA
> share a vision of an interactive visual connection to the fish passage. I
> may try to track down information on their set up as an example.
>
> Lisa Brukilacchio
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Patrick [mailto:epdmarine@...]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 9:13 PM
> To: MysticCrossing@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [MysticCrossing] Re: DMF interested
>
>
> I think that's a wonderful idea. Allowing the Dam to be a destination
> as wellas ameans of crossing the river!
>
>
> --- In MysticCrossing@yahoogroups.com, "Robert Mela" <r.mela@c...>
> wrote:
>> Just a random idea on fish passage --
>>
>> my 2-1/2 year old is a great fan of the little fishies.  It occurred
>> to me that the dam would be one of the few places where human and
> fish
>> passages very nearly intersect.
>>
>> If there's sufficient fish traffic and visibility to make such a
> thing
>> interesting, it'd be fun to provide a window into the fish passage.
>> It could be optical fiber and lenses, or a sonar/fish counter.   If
>> that's not practical, or there isn't fish activity to make it
>> interesting, then heck, just some signage w. a couple of pictures
>> would let folks know about interesting goings-on in the river below.
>>
>>
>> --- In MysticCrossing@yahoogroups.com, APhelps@c... wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> As some of you know, my speciality is "fishes."  Brad, Todd, etc.,
>> please
>>> call me if there is anything specific I can do to help with
> getting
>> better
>>> fish passage on the lower Mystic!
>>>
>>> Anne
>>>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> MysticCrossing-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> MysticCrossing-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>

#45 From: tower@...
Date: Thu Dec 11, 2003 6:26 pm
Subject: RE: Re: DMF interested
lentower
Send Email Send Email
 
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 09:20:21 -0500
    From: "Lisa Brukilacchio" <lisa.b@...>

    Any of us who have had the opportunity to visit the locks in
    Seattle, WA share a vision of an interactive visual connection to
    the fish passage. I may try to track down information on their set
    up as an example.

    Lisa Brukilacchio

Anyone know if the water in the Mystic is clear enough to make an
interactive visual connection worhtwhile?

If it's so murky, you can only see a few inches, an underwater camera
wouldn't show much.

thanx either way -len

#46 From: "jskmystic" <janet@...>
Date: Thu Dec 11, 2003 7:34 pm
Subject: fish passage
jskmystic
Send Email Send Email
 
re: a vision of interactive visual connection to the fish passage and
creating an educational opportunity -

my 2 cents-  (and perhaps a pipe dream -- but. . . )
I too would like to see some attention paid to the fish passage -
specifically something that encourages pedestrians to learn about the
alewife / blueback herring fish migrations, and that if possible,
allows them to see the fish passing through in the spring.
That would be a marvelous educational opportunity to connect people
to the resources - (fish, river, dam -- - ).  (The Seattle locks
sound like an incredible model- perhaps the interactive nature of it
is something that is beyond our possibilities-  but still an
interesting example to keep in mind)

Janet Kovner
janet@...

#47 From: "Tom" <somerun@...>
Date: Thu Dec 11, 2003 9:53 pm
Subject: Mystic Crossing Logo Idea
thagerty1
Send Email Send Email
 
Hey all,
I have been doing some graphic design on the side and figured I would
throw an idea out for a logo for Mystic Crossing. I have uploaded the
logo to the "Photos" section. Please let me know what you all think.

Also, just an FYI that the Somerville Road Runners voted to support
Mystic Crossing at our last club meeting but we do not appear in the
supporters database.

Thanks!
Tom Hagerty
President
Somerville Road Runners
http://www.srr.org

#48 From: Doug Mink <dmink@...>
Date: Fri Dec 12, 2003 5:18 pm
Subject: Re: fish passage
harrismink
Send Email Send Email
 
jskmystic wrote:
>
> re: a vision of interactive visual connection to the fish passage and
> creating an educational opportunity -
>
> my 2 cents-  (and perhaps a pipe dream -- but. . . )
> I too would like to see some attention paid to the fish passage -
> specifically something that encourages pedestrians to learn about the
> alewife / blueback herring fish migrations, and that if possible,
> allows them to see the fish passing through in the spring.
> That would be a marvelous educational opportunity to connect people
> to the resources - (fish, river, dam -- - ).  (The Seattle locks
> sound like an incredible model- perhaps the interactive nature of it
> is something that is beyond our possibilities-  but still an
> interesting example to keep in mind)

We got the Mass. Division of Marine Fisheries to do a program on
anadromous fish in Boston Harbor and the Neponset River.  We held
it at a local yacht club and got quite a good turnout from the
community surrounding the river.  Then a surprisingly large number
(more than 10) of us went down to the river at 4:00 on a Saturday morning
to watch the shad run below the Dorchester Lower Mills dam.  I think
a similar program centered around the Earhart dam would be a good idea.

-Doug Mink

#49 From: "Patrick" <epdmarine@...>
Date: Sun Dec 14, 2003 2:15 pm
Subject: DCR Water Supply Protection Division
patrickjoh
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi All,

This appears to be the DCR Division that manages the Flood Control
Program. Can anyone confirm this and does anyone know the Acting
Director Joe McQuinn?

Patrick




  The Department of Conservation and Recreation Division of Water
Supply Protection manages and protects the drinking water supply
watersheds for nearly 2.2 million residents of Massachusetts,
primarily in Greater Boston. The Quabbin Reservoir, Ware River, and
Wachusett Reservoir watersheds are the sources of drinking water for
distribution by the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority (MWRA).

The Division provides technical staff support to the Water Resources
Commission, which includes coordinating the interagency review of
proposed interbasin transfers, administering cooperative programs
with the US Geological Survey, maintaining and repairing small
watershed flood protection projects, and developing water resources
policy and watershed planning efforts. The Division of Water Supply
Protection manages the DCR Lakes & Ponds Programs, and is responsible
for Dam Safety regulatory oversight, Dam Maintenance and Flood
Control for 185 recreational impoundments in the state forests and
parks system. The Division also administers the registration program
for all well drillers operating in the state and enforces well
driller regulations. The Division's Rainfall Program maintains a
network of approximately 150 precipitation observation stations,
operated by volunteers throughout Massachusetts, and a precipitation
data base for research and analysis.


Joseph M. McGinn, Esq., Acting Director


Manages and protects the drinking water supply watersheds for nearly
2.2 million residents of Massachusetts, primarily in Greater Boston

#50 From: "Patrick" <epdmarine@...>
Date: Sun Dec 14, 2003 2:18 pm
Subject: (No subject)
patrickjoh
Send Email Send Email
 
Does anyone know if the Coastal Access Program would be applicable to
the Crossing or B2C?

  http://www.state.ma.us/dem/programs/coastal/coastal.htm

#51 From: DavidD/JaneS <davdjans@...>
Date: Wed Dec 17, 2003 3:22 am
Subject: Re: (unknown)
davdjans@...
Send Email Send Email
 
Patrick--

You bring up an interesting MA state program and a very interesting way
of thinking about the Amelia Earheart Dam area. Below I copied some
information from the grant section (unfortunately the state isn't doing
grants anymore):

==============================================


       The Coastal Access Grants Program
       Massachusetts Executive Office of Environmental Affairs
       Department of Environmental Management

The Massachusetts Department of Environmental Management (DEM) is not
currently awarding grants due to fiscal restrictions. For reference,
however, its Coastal Access Program is intended to support local and
regional projects that improve and enhance the general public's
recreational access to the coast. "Coastal Access" essentially means
people's ability to reach the shore - primarily physical access, but
also visual access (the ability to see coastal vistas), as well as
psychological access (knowledge and enjoyment of places where access
does exist). The DEM Coastal Access Grants Program is focused primarily
on non-mechanized access for the general public, as opposed to only
local residents or deeded private access. For the purposes of the
program, the "coast" includes the sandy beaches, rocky headlands, tidal
flats, barrier beaches, and bluffs in direct contact with the open sea,
major bays, sounds, and harbors. Projects targeting saltwater estuaries,
salt marshes, and salt ponds will also be considered on a secondary
basis. In addition, the program generally focuses on public access to
and along the coastline rather than boat access to the water.

Priority is given to projects aimed at establishing new public coastal
access opportunities. Secondary priority is given to projects a)
developing plans for design and management of public coastal properties,
b) reclaiming historically public ways to the sea, and c) enhancing or
restoring existing access points and facilities. Tertiary priority is
given to projects developing coastal access interpretive and educational
initiatives. The primary evaluation question is whether, and how much, a
grant-funded project will provide a direct benefit to a significant
portion of the public.

===================================================

I have been part of the Mystic View Task Force for the past few years
and have thought a lot about the Assembly Square area of Somerville. I
had thought about it having a river frontage, but what it really has
both a river frontage and a sea coast because of the dam. The dam makes
this area a very unique area of both Somerville and Everett.

There is another section on the website about land acquisition planning.
Everett and Somerville probably don't fit into the criteria which
doesn't seem fair because of the two cities' population densities.

Jane (Sauer)


Patrick wrote:

>Does anyone know if the Coastal Access Program would be applicable to
>the Crossing or B2C?
>
> http://www.state.ma.us/dem/programs/coastal/coastal.htm
>
>
>
>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>MysticCrossing-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
>

#52 From: epdmarine@...
Date: Wed Dec 17, 2003 4:34 am
Subject: Web Site, Petition & More
patrickjoh
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi All,

Some special announcements:

1.Mystic Crossing now has a web site:
http://www.geocities.com/mysticcrossing2004/

Please review and comment. Suggestions welcome.  Pictures and text
are free for your use. Please forward this site to all.

2. Blank petition form uploaded to group site.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/MysticCrossing/files/

Citizens groups please download and place in public areas for
signatures.

3. I am trying to consolidate all letters of support and would
appreciate everyone creating/sending a letter of support from your
organization to Kathy Abbott via me for the Group. A form letter has
also been posted in the files section for you to download and use.
Feel free to change everything.

Public Officials: Please write a support letter realizing that we may
pull snippets for press releases. If you do not want us to do that,
please advise.

Please send these letters to me as soon as possible and no later that
Jan 15, 2004 if possible.

Email to: MysticCrossing-owner@yahoogroups.com
snailmail to: Patrick Johnston
               32 Gladstone Street
               Everett,Ma 02149

4. Also looking to get excerpts from any reports, studies, etc that
recommend the crossing. These excerpts would be be included in the
package that would be sent out with the support letters.

Thanks

Patrick

#53 From: bryce1@...
Date: Wed Dec 17, 2003 5:19 am
Subject: Fwd: Kathy Abbott to attend Cambridge Ped/Bike Meeting
bryce_nesbitt
Send Email Send Email
 
FYI:

>The new Commissioner of DCR, Kathy Abbott, will attend a
>joint meeting of the Cambridge Bicycle and Pedestrian
>Committees on Wednesday, February 11 at 7 p.m. Thanks to
>Ken Field for making this happen!

#54 From: "Callaghan, Todd (ENV)" <Todd.callaghan@...>
Date: Wed Dec 17, 2003 8:07 pm
Subject: RE: Web Site, Petition & More
Todd.callaghan@...
Send Email Send Email
 
Great website Pat.  I'm still trying to coordinate with our people here
to get interest and perhaps a suport letter.

Todd

-----Original Message-----
From: epdmarine@... [mailto:epdmarine@...]
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 11:35 PM
To: MysticCrossing@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [MysticCrossing] Web Site, Petition & More


Hi All,

Some special announcements:

1.Mystic Crossing now has a web site:
http://www.geocities.com/mysticcrossing2004/

Please review and comment. Suggestions welcome.  Pictures and text
are free for your use. Please forward this site to all.

2. Blank petition form uploaded to group site.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/MysticCrossing/files/

Citizens groups please download and place in public areas for
signatures.

3. I am trying to consolidate all letters of support and would
appreciate everyone creating/sending a letter of support from your
organization to Kathy Abbott via me for the Group. A form letter has
also been posted in the files section for you to download and use.
Feel free to change everything.

Public Officials: Please write a support letter realizing that we may
pull snippets for press releases. If you do not want us to do that,
please advise.

Please send these letters to me as soon as possible and no later that
Jan 15, 2004 if possible.

Email to: MysticCrossing-owner@yahoogroups.com
snailmail to: Patrick Johnston
               32 Gladstone Street
               Everett,Ma 02149

4. Also looking to get excerpts from any reports, studies, etc that
recommend the crossing. These excerpts would be be included in the
package that would be sent out with the support letters.

Thanks

Patrick



To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
MysticCrossing-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com




Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/MysticCrossing/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
MysticCrossing-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

#55 From: r.mela@...
Date: Thu Dec 18, 2003 2:45 am
Subject: Re: Web Site, Petition & More
rmela
Send Email Send Email
 
> Our mission includes keeping the larger basin wide issues
> in mind such as future Crossings at Routes 28, 99 and
> 16, fish migration, flood control, recreational boating
> and many others.

I love it, but it sounds like focus creep.  But it touches on subjects
near and dear to my heart, so I'll comment.

I've crossed the Mystic a lot on both 28 and 16.  Rt 16 already has
very wide sidewalks on both sides as well as passages under the
bridge.  Barriers btw the sidewalk and the road ( as on 28 ) would be
nice, but what we've got now is adequate.

What is really awful about 16 is crossing the Malden.  The sidewalk is
unusually narrow, and has one or two really dangerous obstructions
popping out of the concrete.   Going eastbound, the curve coming off
the bridge and onto Mystic Way has poor visibility.  I go very slowly
so as not to startle pedestrians, but a less circumspect cyclist
coming the other way could result in a crash ( and somebody would
probably fall into traffic ).

As for 28, the sidewalks are too narrow, though the concrete barrier
makes me feel safe from any errant traffic.  The other issue about 28
is that crossing the road itself is a drag.  So much so that I now
usually take my car when I know I have to pass through that area.

#56 From: Bryce W Nesbitt <bryce1@...>
Date: Thu Dec 18, 2003 3:05 am
Subject: Re: Re: Web Site, Petition & More
bryce_nesbitt
Send Email Send Email
 
r.mela@... wrote:
Our mission includes keeping the larger basin wide issues in mind such as future Crossings at Routes 28, 99 and 16, fish migration, flood control, recreational boating
and many others.

I love it, but it sounds like focus creep. But it touches on subjects
near and dear to my heart, so I'll comment.
One of the ostensible reasons to ask for the dam crossing is to create recreational loops in the lower basin, such as:

Earhart Dam->Gateway Park->Over Route 16->Through Wellington MBTA parking Lot->Under Orange Line->Over Route 28 bridge->Back through Assembly Square to the dam.

So keeping an eye toward the bigger picture is something I see as valuable, as long as we set firm expectations.  I'd like to see us agree on a reasonable scope for the crossing, including a budget.  Any plan that is more than a certain cost or time, we ought to reject.  I'd set the thresholds at 1 year and $200,000.

                                  -Bryce

#57 From: "bryce_nesbitt" <bryce1@...>
Date: Thu Dec 18, 2003 6:05 pm
Subject: Copy of letter sent by Friends of the Community Path
bryce_nesbitt
Send Email Send Email
 
Kathy Abbot, Commissioner
Department of Conservation and Recreation
251 Causeway Street, Suite 600
Boston MA 02114-2104

December 18, 2003

Dear Commissioner Abbot;

We are writing in support of the recent proposal to open the top of
the Amelia Earhart Dam to public access.  Our organization, the
Friends of the Community Path, is working on a pathway in a different
part of Somerville.  However, we recognize the value of connections.
When fragments of paths and trails are connected together, they become
more valuable than the sum of their parts.  That spirit has moved our
project forward, and certainly applies to the dam crossing.

We have enclosed a map showing the potential network of paths in the
region, including the Earhart Dam crossing.   Such a network would
offer tremendous recreational, commuting and utilitarian
transportation benefits.

We urge you to keep the scope of any dam crossing project reasonable.
   A project costing hundreds of thousands of dollars is not required.
   With a few simple railings, plates and warning lights, the dam
crossing can be achieved.

                             Sincerely,
                             Bryce Nesbitt for
                             the Friends of the Community Path

Cc: Patrick Johnson, Everett Marine/Homeland Security Patrol

#58 From: "gillespcj" <Gillespj@...>
Date: Thu Dec 18, 2003 6:53 pm
Subject: Education Grant
gillespcj
Send Email Send Email
 
I know that our primary focus right now is not that of obtaining
funding, however this is an example of how the group might advocate
for the public education aspects such as the fish passage associated
with the pedestrian access across the Amelia Earhart.

Check out this available 2004 grant opportunity from EPA.

http://www.epa.gov/region1/pr/2003/nov/031114.html

#59 From: "Bryce Nesbitt (spam account)" <bryce1@...>
Date: Thu Dec 18, 2003 6:59 pm
Subject: Re: Education Grant
bryce_nesbitt
Send Email Send Email
 
gillespcj wrote:

>I know that our primary focus right now is not that of obtaining
>funding, however this is an example of how the group might advocate
>for the public education aspects such as the fish passage associated
>with the pedestrian access across the Amelia Earhart.
>
>Check out this available 2004 grant opportunity from EPA.
>
>http://www.epa.gov/region1/pr/2003/nov/031114.html
>
>
Great opportunity.  Could it be used for a water sampling station,
weather station, or other environmental education object to
be placed on the future dam crossing?

                 -Bryce

#60 From: MysticCrossing@yahoogroups.com
Date: Fri Dec 19, 2003 3:43 pm
Subject: New file uploaded to MysticCrossing
MysticCrossing@yahoogroups.com
Send Email Send Email
 
Hello,

This email message is a notification to let you know that
a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the MysticCrossing
group.

   File        : /Support_Letter_Brief.doc
   Uploaded by : bryce_nesbitt <bryce1@...>
   Description : Short form support letter, fill in the blank design

You can access this file at the URL

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/MysticCrossing/files/Support_Letter_Brief.doc

To learn more about file sharing for your group, please visit

http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/groups/files

Regards,

bryce_nesbitt <bryce1@...>

#61 From: "bryce_nesbitt" <bryce1@...>
Date: Fri Dec 19, 2003 3:44 pm
Subject: Kathy Abbott not Kathy Abbot
bryce_nesbitt
Send Email Send Email
 
FYI: The support letter template was missing a "t" in Kathy's last name.

#62 From: epdmarine@...
Date: Fri Dec 19, 2003 3:00 pm
Subject: Fwd: EVERETT RELEASE: Barrios endorses Everett's waterfront plan -- PHOTO AT...
patrickjoh
Send Email Send Email
 
 
 
Ofc. Patrick Johnston
Everett Police Marine Unit
617-905-3747
NEWS RELEASE

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE           PLEASE CONTACT
December 19, 2003                   Colin Durrant,
617-722-1650

BARRIOS ENDORSES EVERETT'S WATERFRONT PLAN

Everett, MA -- Saying it would help encourage residents to rediscover their
waterfront, Senator Jarrett T. Barrios (D-Cambridge) last week announced his
strong support for the City of Everett's newly developed vision for the
Mystic, Malden and Island End River waterfronts.   The Senator joined
Everett's Director of Community and Economic Development, Beth Debski, and
Lieutenant Patrick McAdam and Officer Patrick Johnston of the Everett Police
Marine Division on a boat tour of Everett's waterfront.  The tour addressed
proposals that would both increase waterfront access for city residents and
boost housing and commercial development while maintaining industrial uses
that provide an economic base for the city.

"Everett residents deserve more access to their waterfront for recreational
boating and other public uses," said Senator Barrios.  "It's clear that the
City of Everett is committed to this goal by developing a wide-ranging
vision for their waterfront and I wholeheartedly endorse their plan."

The Everett Waterfront Assessment was developed in 2002 by the City's
appointed Waterfront Development Advisory Committee to define Everett's
vision for future use of the city's waterfront and to create a blueprint for
how to implement that vision.  The city initiated planning in order to
balance the need to reclaim the waterfront for public use while at the same
time preserving its maritime industrial base.  Everett's waterfront plan
proposes to increase access through a harbor walk, "mixed" residential and
commercial development, new parks and boat ramps.  Additionally, the city
focuses its attention on several existing projects such as the Bike to the
Sea bike trail, which would connect Everett to Lynn, and Mystic Crossing,
which is organizing support for pedestrian access across the Mystic River
into Somerville via the Amelia Earhart Dam.

"Many of our residents are unaware that Everett has 3.5 miles of waterfront.
For too long, the waterfront was inaccessible to the public.  One of the
City's goals is to promote public awareness of the waterfront and provide
new opportunities for public access to the waterfront.  Our waterfront is a
wonderful asset that we should proudly showcase.  We look forward to
implementing our vision for the future of Everett's waterfront," stated
Debski.

"As we look to the future it's important for us to expand the public's
access to the river but at the same time we must continue supporting
industry that provides an economic boost to the region," added Senator
Barrios.

PHOTO ATTACHED: Senator Barrios; Everett's Director of Community and
Economic Development, Beth Debski; and Lieutenant Patrick McAdam of the
Everett Police Marine Division prepare to tour Everett's waterfront.
###

  <<RELEASE -- Barrios endorses Everett vision for waterfront.doc>>
<<Senator Barrios, Beth Debski and Lieutenant Patrick McAdam.jpg>>

Colin Durrant
Director of Communications and Public Policy
State Senator Jarrett T. Barrios
P: 617-722-1650
F: 617-722-1323

Representing the communities of Allston-Brighton, Cambridge, Charlestown,
Chelsea, Everett, Revere, Saugus & Somerville

#63 From: epdmarine@...
Date: Sun Dec 21, 2003 4:14 pm
Subject: Locks being used for flood control- Pic
patrickjoh
Send Email Send Email
 
Here is a pic of the Earhart Dam big lock being used for flood control purposes.
 
 
 
Ofc. Patrick Johnston
Everett Police Marine Unit
617-905-3747

#64 From: "Bryce Nesbitt (mailing list account)" <bryce1@...>
Date: Mon Dec 22, 2003 12:18 am
Subject: Re: Locks being used for flood control- Pic
bryce_nesbitt
Send Email Send Email
 
epdmarine@... wrote:

>Here is a pic of the Earhart Dam big lock being used for flood control
>purposes.
>
Drag out the kayaks or whitewater rafts!

this picture does
bring up an operational constraint that needs to be considered.
What is the maximum "open" time permissible to avoid delay to
pedestrians, and what is a reasonable maximum "close" time to avoid
killing fish?

These time limits could be built into the dam control system, so a
warning buzzer sounds if they are exceeded.

                 -Bryce

#65 From: "Robert Mela" <r.mela@...>
Date: Mon Dec 22, 2003 2:24 am
Subject: Re: Locks being used for flood control- Pic
rmela
Send Email Send Email
 
Not a problem.  With a ramp a bike could jump it at 15 to 20 mph.
Many pedestrians could easily cross on a rope.   Moreover, both
solutions are inexpensive.

--- In MysticCrossing@yahoogroups.com, epdmarine@a... wrote:
> Here is a pic of the Earhart Dam big lock being used for flood control
> purposes.
>
>
>
>
> Ofc. Patrick Johnston
> Everett Police Marine Unit
> 617-905-3747

#66 From: tower@...
Date: Tue Dec 23, 2003 3:35 am
Subject: Re: Locks being used for flood control- Pic
lentower
Send Email Send Email
 
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2003 19:18:43 -0500
    From: "Bryce Nesbitt (mailing list account)" <bryce1@...>

    Drag out the kayaks or whitewater rafts!

    this picture does
    bring up an operational constraint that needs to be considered.
    What is the maximum "open" time permissible to avoid delay to
    pedestrians, and what is a reasonable maximum "close" time to avoid
    killing fish?

    These time limits could be built into the dam control system, so a
    warning buzzer sounds if they are exceeded.

                    -Bryce

Anyone know how the Charles River Dam handles this?

thanx either way -len

#67 From: epdmarine@...
Date: Wed Dec 24, 2003 12:09 am
Subject: Fwd: MYRWA receives CHALLENGE GRANT
patrickjoh
Send Email Send Email
 
 
 
Ofc. Patrick Johnston
Everett Police Marine Unit
617-905-3747
A message from John Reinhardt, Board of Directors, Mystic River Watershed
Association

----- Original Message -----
Please help the Mystic River Watershed Association (MyRWA) meet
a very generous challenge grant from Tufts' University College.  Every
dollar that we receive from members and donors by March 20, 2004, will
be matched by University College up to $15,000!  This is a very
important and unique opportunity to provide the Mystic River's clearest
voice more financial stability

This is a huge opportunity.  Yes, I too am seemingly bombarded
by year end donations.  I am exhorted to take advantage of the tax
deduction and help a good cause simultaneously.  In this case, I know
how much the Mystic River Watershed Association needs the funds and how
much our volunteers multiply the impacts.

I, as a member of the Board of Directors, feel that MyRWA is at
a crossroads.  While its energy and mission are not at stake, because we
have a good base of faithful support, the MyRWA's ability to develop a
significant presence by responding to an array of pressing issues is at
risk due to our need for staff support.  The MyRWA must collect enough
support to sustain our energetic, dedicated, and small staff.  Nancy,
Janet, and Julie work very hard to sustain the many fronts MyRWA
addresses, including (just to name a few):
- prioritizing water quality issues throughout the watershed;
- open space inventories throughout the watershed;
- water quality issues in the Alewife Brook;
- flooding issues in the Alewife sub-watershed;
- development around the Middlesex fells;
- environmental justice;
- flooding in the Aberjona sub-watershed; development around the Alewife
Reservation; - water quality on the Chelsea Creek and Malden River; as
well as
- responding to current issues (e.g., the Amelia Earhart Dam drawdown).

Please help stabilize this powerful Mystic River advocate by
sending money to :
Mystic River Watershed Association
20 Academy Street, Suite 203
Arlington, Massachusetts 02476.

Yes, donations are tax deductible in 2003 as well as 2004.

--^----------------------------------------------------------------
This email was sent to: EPDMARINE@...

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bz8QYN.bed0LS.RVBETUFS
Or send an email to: mystic-river-unsubscribe@...

TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/create/index2.html
--^----------------------------------------------------------------

#68 From: Ron Newman <rnewman@...>
Date: Wed Dec 24, 2003 5:48 pm
Subject: Please don't send attachments
rnewman_57
Send Email Send Email
 
Please do not send attachments to this list.   They show up in the
digest as just

> [This message contained attachments]

and there is no way to read them.

#69 From: epdmarine@...
Date: Wed Dec 24, 2003 2:32 pm
Subject: Re: Please don't send attachments
patrickjoh
Send Email Send Email
 
Will do...the photos were posted in the photo section under flood control.
 
Ofc. Patrick Johnston
Everett Police Marine Unit
617-905-3747

#70 From: "Patrick" <epdmarine@...>
Date: Wed Dec 24, 2003 9:11 pm
Subject: Happy Holidays!
patrickjoh
Send Email Send Email
 
Best wishes for a very Happy Holiday Season!


Patrick

#71 From: epdmarine@...
Date: Sun Dec 28, 2003 3:40 pm
Subject: MYSTIC RIVER Stream of consciousness
patrickjoh
Send Email Send Email
 
MYSTIC RIVER

Stream of consciousness

Poor man's waterway, for decades left neglected, is finding its champions

There's been no lights, camera, or action for the Mystic River. The Boston Harbor and Charles River cleanups have had their billions and their fanfare. But the Mystic -- where some of the Commonwealth's poorest communities with large immigrant populations go to fish, boat, and swim -- has been left behind, according to many who care about it.

''It's a very neglected body of water and very much impacted by industry," says Nancy Hammett, executive director of the Mystic River Watershed Association, a citizens group that has been working to protect and restore the water quality and natural resources of the watershed area for the past 30 years.

Hammett says her group has been conducting surveys to better understand how the river is being used, dispatching bicyclists to ride along the river observing activities and interview people fishing, swimming, and boating. The association has also been testing water -- and finding high levels of bacteria.

''A lot of people are eating the fish," she says. ''My first reaction is, 'Oh my God!' "

Still, others who know the Mystic say things are getting better.

''Four or five years ago there were no snails," says fisherman Tom Tavares. ''Now there are. It's a good sign that the water is cleaning up." Tavares, who has been going down to Draw Seven Park at the Amelia Earhart Dam to fish for nearly 25 years, says clams are starting to make a comeback, too.

The area in question is large: The Mystic River Watershed encompasses 76 square miles and 21 communities, according to the association. The system's headwater begins with the Aberjona River in Reading and flows into the Upper Mystic Lake, and the Mystic River flows directly from the Lower Mystic Lake and ultimately empties into Boston Harbor.

Among the people who live and work along it, reviews of how the watershed is really faring are mixed.

The Charlestown Side

After years of staring at an abandoned lot full of overgrown weeds and household trash, Ann and Joe Silva decided to take matters into their own hands. Since 1998, they've been working with other Charlestown residents to clean up the park on Terminal Street. ''The city doesn't do anything," says Ann Silva, who says the locals refer to the park as Montego Bay, referring to all the stolen cars -- particularly Monte Carlos -- that used to be dumped there. ''We're doing the cleaning. We're doing the sweeping."

With little open space and dense communities, access to the river is limited. ''We're so jammed in here," says Silva, 57, who has lived in the neighborhood for 35 years. She says after she's had a fight with her husband, the park is a nice place to go to cool off. ''We go over there for some space. When you go by the water it soothes you."

Silva says she and her husband spend $6 a week on sturdy trash bags to clean up the park. On a fixed income, Silva says that's a lot, but it's worth it since her husband does most of the trash removal and sometimes finds needles and other items he'd rather put in a secure bag than let get loose again. For a recent Father's Day, Silva said her son sent some money as a gift and the couple purchased a new weed whacker to use in the park.

A few years ago, Silva says she was able to get two picnic tables donated from the Charlestown offices of Massachusetts General Hospital, and she and her husband built a bench facing the water. Thanks to the changes, residents use the park during the day and often drag grills down on a summer night to cook dinner.

''It's a lively little inlet," says Ivey St. John, chairwoman of the Charlestown Waterfront Coalition's strategic planning committee.

''Frankly, the BRA has neglected it," she says, referring to the Boston Redevelopment Authority, which oversees the property.

Dave McLaughlin, assistant director of communications for the BRA, says his agency has worked out an agreement with a local marine shop to maintain the boat ramp at the inlet, so that it is available for public use. As for the park being neglected, McLaughlin says the BRA is currently negotiating to have that area maintained as well.

St. John's group is working with neighboring industries and city officials to establish a haul road to help divert industrial traffic away from residential areas, while also focusing on other traffic and environmental issues. ''We're just interested in ensuring and enhancing public access to the Mystic River," says St. John.

But while the park looks nice and Silva says she is proud of the work she's done, she's angry about the water quality. ''There are grown men who swim in there," she exclaims. ''I would never do that." She says her husband sometimes sees fuel streams in the water and traces them back to the docks where they originated. Sometimes kids in the neighborhood get sick after swimming, Silva says.

''How these kids are still alive is baffling to me," says St. John, noting that the same commercial and industrial growth that cities are pining for is also hurting the river. ''It's a Catch 22," she says.

Fishing the Mystic Up the river a ways, a group of 10 or so men, including Tom Tavares, have been hard at work to keep another waterfront park clean and accessible. ''This area is a beautiful park," Tavares says of the Draw Seven. ''It needs tender loving care, and no one wants to give it. So, we kind of maintain it ourselves."

Tavares and his buddies cut the grass, pick up trash, and generally keep the place looking nice. They've bolted two chairs to a nearby fence and placed at the top of a long flagpole a wooden fish that one of the gang carved and painted. During the summer, Tavares says he's often at the park before the sun comes up and doesn't leave until well after dark. Tavares says he usually catches bass, but last year bluefish and mackerel appeared.

The park is just behind Assembly Square and is bordered by train tracks. Other than the rumbling of the Orange Line and the commuter rail, Tavares and his friends usually have few interruptions. But recently, they've been bothered by the addition of a chain-link fence near the dam entrance.

''That will be our own personal gill net soon," says Tavares, pointing as he explains that come spring he's sure the herring will get trapped in the fence, which juts out into the water, and start to stink up the area. He's tried to get officials to pay attention, but he's gotten nowhere.

Juan Mejia, one of the group, says he just knows that he should keep away from the fish. ''No, no. I wouldn't touch that stuff," says Mejia, who has been fishing with Tavares for 15 years. ''All the industrial stuff around here. That's why I'm afraid of taking the fish from here." Instead Mejia throws back what he catches, spends time with his friends, and gives his dog Bobby an opportunity to be outside. ''It's like a club," he says of the group, which meets at the park almost every day, even in winter. ''They weren't maintaining the park, so we brought in our own weed whackers."

Tavares is hopeful that the various community groups that are now paying attention to the Mystic will be able to make some significant strides. He wants to see the rusty pipes on the beach removed and hopes someone will deal with the dilapidated dock at the end of the beach.

On the other side of the dam, not far from Draw Seven Park, the Blessing of the Bay Boathouse sits as home to one of the Boys & Girls Clubs of Middlesex County. Gary Gartland, president and CEO of the organization, says that on a sunny summer day there could be 30 canoes and kayaks, with local teens learning to boat and enjoying the water. But the youths aren't permitted to swim, and Gartland says he's pulled shopping carts, tires, and rusty metal from the bay.

''There are kids from Somerville who if you didn't bring them there they wouldn't know there was a Mystic River," says Gartland. ''That's a place for kids to get out on the water, expand their horizons and see that there is some pretty neat open space in Somerville that they never knew about." With outreach and education, Gartland says more people are becoming aware and interested in the boathouse and the river. He says during summer the public is welcome to rent boats for a nominal fee.

Eastie teens get involved Another group of teens has been given a very different introduction to the watershed area. This past summer, Neighborhood of Affordable Housing, a local organization that works to improve the quality of life for East Boston residents, hired several high schoolers to work on environmental issues and learn about environmental justice. The Environmental Chelsea Creek Crew is composed of five teens who are willing to brave even the coldest of days to test the Chelsea Creek water from East Boston's Condor Street Urban Wild. The park was renovated and unveiled recently, after having been converted from a brownfield.

Staring out at uncovered salt piles and industry across the creek, the teens sample water while testing for salinity, acidity, and temperature. ''They're testing to get a feel for what can and can't live here," explains Meghan McGrath, youth coordinator for Neighborhood of Affordable Housing.

''This is a major achievement," McGrath says of the park cleanup. Part of environmental justice includes establishing access to the waterfront for certain communities, and the newly opened park opens up the opportunity for neighbors to enjoy the water. ''This is a point of access that the community deserves."

And the teens are proud of the part they've played in the park's renovation.

''I used to stay away from it because it was so dirty," says 15-year-old Shaundra Miles. ''But now after school I go down to the park to hang out."

''These kids have taken some ownership of this park," says McGrath, explaining that they've become stewards and community leaders through this after-school and summer program. ''It's theirs now, and they care about it."

The teens have organized cleanups and holiday events to promote the new park, and they have gone door-to-door letting nearby residents know about the open space now available for use.

The group is learning about air and water quality and that some of the area's watersheds are treated with more respect and given more attention than the Mystic. ''Just because we're teenagers, we've learned that we can teach others about environmental justice and teach them how harmful it is to throw things in the river," says Camilo Toro, a high school junior. ''We want East Boston to look as nice as all of the other areas around us. It's not fair for East Boston to carry all of the salt piles."

Cleaning up the MysticNancy Hammett says the Mystic River Watershed Association and other groups have a goal in mind: ''Fishable and swimmable by 2010," she says. But listing some of the problems that must first be tackled reveals that the goal is a daunting -- almost overwhelming -- one.

''Water quality is a major problem," says Kwabena Kyei-Aboagye, the state's environmental justice coordinator. Kyei-Aboagye says initial sediment reports from the US Geological Survey indicate there are high levels of metals and waste in the soil, though other tests have been inconclusive. ''The river is not really healthy for any kind of activity," he says. ''It needs a lot of help."

Part of what makes the pollution a justice issue is that ''immigrants who don't speak English fish all of the river," says Kyei-Aboagye, who acknowledges that more signage, in various languages, is needed along its banks. ''Everybody has the right to live in and enjoy clean and healthy environments."

In addition to contamination and water quality issues, the lack of open space and access to the river is a problem, according to Hammett.

She says the association and others are publicizing the various boathouses along the river that offer opportunities for canoeing and boating.

''We don't want people to turn their back on their river, but we want them to use it safely," she says.

Federal and state funding cuts, particularly in the area of the environment, have slowed progress.

''Of the money that's there, we want to see that the Mystic gets a share of it," says Hammett. ''The Charles has gotten a lot of attention and money." She points out that the pampering has paid off, since the Charles is often swimmable and access to the river is good.

''More people are affected by dirty industry in poorer communities and minority communities," says state Senator Jarrett Barrios, who has introduced the Clean and Healthy Communities Act, aimed at creating regulations to protect communities from poor environmental policies and pollution caused by industry. ''We want to create incentives for clean industry to come into the community."

Barrios's legislation would work to define those lacking environmental justice, and target compliance and enforcement while helping communities to deal with industrial waste.

As well, the bill would mandate the expansion of programs to turn brownfields --land that has become polluted, then abandoned -- into redeveloped areas.

''People have begun a dialogue," says Lisa Brukilacchio, a community engagement specialist with the University College of Citizenship and Public Service at Tufts University. Tufts students and faculty have partnered with the watershed association to work on the river-related issues and are currently working to come up with a plan of action. ''These are hard topics. We're talking about the possibility that some citizens get more or less than their share."

An initial summit titled ''Environmental Justice Across the Mystic" was held in November at Tufts in an effort to bring together various communities and local groups to start pooling resources, energy, and information.

''The issues facing the Mystic River are major," says the state's Kyei-Aboagye. ''It took many years to degrade the river, so it's going to take many more to fix it."

E-mail Bridget Samburg at BSamburg@....

 
Ofc. Patrick Johnston
Everett Police Marine Unit
617-905-3747

#72 From: epdmarine@...
Date: Tue Dec 30, 2003 8:05 pm
Subject: Fwd: [MassHM] EPA Grants for Water Quality Projects
patrickjoh
Send Email Send Email
 
 
 
Ofc. Patrick Johnston
Everett Police Marine Unit
617-905-3747

http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/14mar20010800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2003/03-31236.htm

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Notice of Request for Initial Proposals (IPs) for Projects To Be
Funded From the Water Quality Cooperative Agreement Allocation (CFDA
66.463--Water Quality Cooperative Agreements)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is soliciting Initial Proposals (IPs) from States, Tribes,
local governments, universities, non-profits, and other eligible
entities, as shown below in the section called Eligible Applicants,
interested in applying for Federal assistance for Water Quality
Cooperative Agreements (CFDA 66.463) under the Clean Water Act (CWA)
section 104(b)(3). EPA Headquarters intends to award an estimated $3.5
million to eligible applicants through assistance agreements ranging in
size from $10,000 up to $500,000 for Water Quality Cooperative
Agreements, which are for unique and innovative projects that address
the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
Systems (NPDES) program with special emphasis on wet weather
activities, i.e., storm water, combined sewer overflows, sanitary sewer
overflows, and concentrated animal feeding operations as well as
projects that enhance the ability of the regulated community to deal
with non-traditional pollution problems in priority watersheds. From
the IPs received, EPA estimates that 30 to 35 projects may be selected
to submit full applications.

The Agency intends to make
available at least $200,000 per year of
the annual appropriation for Water Quality Cooperative Agreements, from
FY 2004 through FY 2005, for projects which address cooling water
intake issues to include technical and environmental studies. The
Agency has made available $600,000 from FY 2001 through FY 2003. It is
expected that the $200,000 available for cooling water intake projects
in FY 2004 will be used to fund a project approved in a prior year.
    The Agency reserves the right to reject all IPs and
make no awards.

DATES: EPA will consider all IPs received on or before 5 p.m. Eastern
Time, February 17, 2004. IPs received after the due date, may be
reviewed at EPA's discretion.

ADDRESSES: It is preferred that IPs be electronically mailed (E-mailed)
to WQCA2004@.... If mailed
through the postal service or other
means, three copies should be sent to: Barry Benroth, 4204M, WQCA2004
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20460.
    The following address must be used for delivery of the
copies by an
overnight delivery or courier service: Barry Benroth, 4204M, WQCA2004,
Phone 202-564-0672, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Room 7324 J,
EPA East, 1201 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barry Benroth by telephone at 202-564-
0672 or by E-mail at
benroth.barry@....

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Purpose of This Request Is for Initial Proposals

    The Office of Wastewater Management, Office of Water
at EPA
Headquarters is requesting IPs from States, Tribes, local governments,
non-profit organizations and other eligible entities under the Clean
Water Act Section 104(b)(3) for unique and innovative projects that
address the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination Systems (NPDES) program with special emphasis on wet
weather activities, i.e., storm water, and concentrated animal feeding
operations as well as projects that enhance the ability of the
regulated community to deal with non-traditional pollution problems in
priority watersheds.
    An organization whose IP is selected for possible
Federal
assistance must complete an EPA Application for Assistance, including
the Federal SF-424 form (Application for Federal Assistance, see 40 CFR
30.12 and 31.10).
    Organizations who have an existing agreement under
this program are
eligible to compete with proposals for new awards.

The Office of Wastewater Management, Office of Water, EPA Headquarters
Has Identified the Following High Priority Areas for Consideration

    Assistance agreements awarded under Section 104(b)(3)
may only be
used to conduct and promote the coordination and acceleration of
activities such as research, investigations, experiments, training,
education, demonstrations, surveys, and studies relating to the causes,
effect, extent, prevention, reduction, and elimination of water
pollution. These activities, while not defined in the statute, advance
the state of knowledge, gather information, or transfer 
information.
For instance, ``demonstrations'' are generally projects that
demonstrate new or experimental technologies, methods, or approaches
and the results of the project will be disseminated so that others can
benefit from the knowledge gained. A project that is accomplished
through the performance of routine, traditional, or established
practices, or a project that is simply intended to carry out a task
rather than transfer information or advance the state of knowledge,
however worthwhile the project may be, is not a demonstration. Research
projects may include the application of established practices when they
contribute to learning about an environmental concept or problem.
    The Office of Wastewater Management at EPA
Headquarters has
identified several subject areas for priority consideration. EPA will
award Assistance Agreements for research, investigations, experiments,
training, demonstrations, surveys and studies related to the causes,
effects, extent, prevention, reduction, and elimination of water
pollution in the subject areas shown below in bold. Example projects
are shown for each area.

[[Page 70503]]

Water and Wastewater Infrastructure

    Benefits assessment of wastewater infrastructure
investments
including funding from the Clean Water State Revolving Fund program.
    Tools, techniques, benchmarking, or training for more
efficient
wastewater and other systems performance.
    Capacity development for Tribes, Native Villages, and
small
communities to effectively operate and maintain water and wastewater
treatment facilities.
    Innovative water efficiency programs or techniques to
reduce
infrastructure costs or municipal water use.
    Demonstration of remote techniques for assessing the
performance
and environmental impacts of on-site/decentralized wastewater systems.
    Innovative approaches or methods to reduce risk or
impact of
terrorist or other attacks to integrity and effectiveness of wastewater
collections and treatment.

Impacts of Wet Weather Flows

    Test results achieved by peak excess flow technologies
in
collection systems at CSO outfalls and at treatment plants, and test
performance of devices before and after blending. Testing may include
pollutants in effluent or ambient settings.
    Measure, or develop tools to determine the
effectiveness of storm
water BMPs.
    Develop and pilot storm water discharge and ambient
water
monitoring techniques for gauging water quality improvements.
    Develop and pilot sample performance measures for use
by small
Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s) to incorporate into storm
water management plans.
    Outreach on low impact development (LID) and its
potential uses.
    Provide tools to help permitees select options and
overcome
barriers in storm water pollution prevention plan development.

Pathogens

    Conduct studies on monitoring pathogens in wastewater
and
biosolids, including bacterial, viruses and parasites.
    Conduct studies on treatability of pathogens in
wastewater.
    Characterization of impacts of PH levels on 
municipal
infrastructure systems (pretreatment discharges to POTWs).

National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Program
Strategies To Implement Watershed-based Efforts

    Conduct a demonstration project that provides support
to facilitate
watershed-based permitting and trading.
    Develop and pilot innovative techniques to facilitate
NPDES program
management for enhanced results, integrity and/or efficiency.

Animal Feeding Operations

    Develop and demonstrate innovative or alternative
technologies for
CAFOs to treat/process wastewater or manage manure.
    CAFO producer outreach programs to train/educate the
industry on
implementation of the CAFO rule.
    EPA may also consider other project areas for funding
to the extent
authorized by CWA section 104(b)(3) and to the extent funds are
available for such project areas.

Statutory Authority, Applicable Regulations, and Funding Level

    Water Quality Cooperative Agreements are awarded under
the
authority of section 104(b)(3) of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C.
1254(b)(3)).
    The regulations governing the award and administration
of Water
Quality Cooperative Agreements are 40 CFR part 30 (for institutions of
higher learning, hospitals, and other non-profit organizations) and 40
CFR part 31 and 40 CFR part 35, subparts A and B (for States, Tribes,
local governments, intertribal consortia, and interstate agencies).
    Applicants requested to submit a full application
(SF-424) will be
required to comply with Intergovernmental Review requirements (40 CFR
part 29).
    Applicants must provide a Dun and Bradstreet (D&B)
Data Universal
Numbering System (DUNS) number with the full application. Organizations
may obtain the number by calling, toll free, 1-866-705-5711.
    Total funding available for award by Headquarters will
depend on
EPA's appropriation for Fiscal Year 2004; however, it is estimated that
$3.5 million will be available for funding approved projects. The
average size of an award is anticipated to be approximately $100,000.
    Construction projects, except for the construction
required to
carry out a demonstration project, and acquisition of land, are not
eligible for funding under this program. New or on-going programs to
implement environmental controls are not eligible for funding under
this program.

Request for Initial Proposal Format and Contents

    IPs should be limited to four pages. Full application
packages
should not be submitted at this time. It is recommended that
confidential information not be included in the IP. The following
format should be used for all IPs:
    Name of Project:
    Point of Contact: (Individual and Organization Name,
Address, Phone
Number, Fax Number, E-mail Address)
    Is This a Continuation of a Previously Funded Project
(if so,
please provide the number and status of the current grant or
cooperative agreement):
    Proposed Award Amount:
    Proposed Awardee Cost Share: (Cost sharing is not
required)
    Description of General Budget Proposed To Support
Project:
    Project Area: (based on areas of interest shown
above)
    Project Description: (Should not exceed three pages of
single-
spaced text)
    Expected Accomplishments or Product, With Dates,
Environmental
Results and Interim Milestones: This section should also include a
discussion of a communication plan for distributing the project results
to interested parties.
    Describe How the Project Meets the Evaluation Criteria
Specified
Below:

EPA IP Evaluation Criteria

    EPA will award Water Quality Cooperative Agreements on
a
competitive basis and evaluate IPs based on the following criteria
(maximum points for each element are shown).

    [sbull] The relationship of the proposed project to
the priorities
identified in this notice. (5)
    [sbull] How well the project proposes to address a
nationally
important need, issue, or interest. (30)
    [sbull] Communication plan to transfer results of the
project to
other potentially interested parties. (25)
    [sbull] How well the project furthers the goal of the
Clean Water
Act to prevent, reduce, and eliminate water pollution. (20)
    [sbull] Leverage of other resources (e.g., cost
share,
participation by other organizations) as part of the proposed approach.
(10)
    [sbull] Cost effectiveness and reasonableness of the
proposal. (10)

    The IPs will be evaluated by EPA staff on the elements
shown above.
Maximum points equals 100. EPA may consider IPs even if all criteria
are not fully met, provided the proposed projects meet the applicable
statutory and regulatory requirements and funds

[[Page 70504]]

are available for such projects. IPs which are not in compliance with
the notice, i.e., do not provide the required information, are
submitted by ineligible applicants, are considered to be primarily
construction projects, or are for the acquisition of land will not be
considered.

IP Selection

    Final selection of IPs will be made by the Director,
Office of
Wastewater Management. Selected organizations will be notified and
requested to submit a full application. It is expected that
unsuccessful applicants will be notified by e-mail.

Eligible Applicants

    Eligible applicants for assistance agreements under
section
104(b)(3) of the Clean Water Act are State water pollution control
agencies, Tribal governments, intertribal consortia, interstate
agencies, and other public or non-profit private agencies,
institutions, organizations and individuals.

Application Procedure

    Electronic transmittal of IPs is preferred to
facilitate the review
process. Hard copies are acceptable. Please send three copies of the
IPs if it is not electronically transmitted.

Dispute Resolution Process

    Procedures at 40 CFR 30.63 and 40 CFR 31.70 apply.

Type of Assistance

    It is expected that all the awards under this program
will be
cooperative agreements. States, interstate agencies, federally
recognized tribes, and intertribal consortia meeting the requirements
at 40 CFR 35.504 may include the funds for Water Quality Cooperative
Agreements in a Performance Partnership Grant (PPG) in accordance with
the regulations governing PPGs at 40 CFR part 35, subparts A and B. For
states and interstate agencies that choose to do so, the regulations
provide that the work plan commitments that would have been included in
the WQCA must be included in the PPG work plan. A description of the
Agency's substantial involvement in cooperative agreements will be
included in the final agreement.

Schedule of Activities

    This is the estimated schedule of activities for
submission, review
of proposals and notification of selections:
    February 17, 2004--RFIPs due to EPA.
    March 29, 2004--Initial approvals identified and
sponsors of
projects selected for funding will be requested to submit a formal
application package. Schedule may be modified based on the level of
response.
    A list of selected projects will be posted on the
Office of
Wastewater Management Web site
http://www.epa.gov/owm/wqca/2004.htm.

This web site may also contain additional information about this
request. Deadline extensions, if any, will be posted on this web site
and not in the Federal Register.

    Dated: December 11, 2003.
Jane S. Moore,
Deputy Director, Office of Wastewater Management.
[FR Doc. 03-31236 Filed 12-17-03; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


Yahoo! Groups Links


Messages 43 - 72 of 493   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2010 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines NEW - Help