... Tamara ... Todd: You are welcome. Just because it is valid in its form, does not make it true. Agreed? ... the ... Todd, if you fellows have misunderstood...
5496
dfyffe1
dfyffe1@...
Feb 1, 2005 12:13 pm
... so I've ... it been weeks? ... while ... deleting posts unread. ... familiar with ... list who has ... Those who ... admitted to being ... stumble. And I...
5497
dfyffe1
dfyffe1@...
Feb 1, 2005 12:13 pm
... the Genesis ... wholsesale ... question is ... implies revelation and ... and clear ... God. The ... Those who believe it ... Such would ... clear ... ...
5498
dfyffe1
dfyffe1@...
Feb 1, 2005 12:13 pm
... is ... Robert, I have said PLAINLY your "major premise" is false! That will NOT change. It is false to the core. I have explained why twice to date. You...
5499
rlbaty50
Feb 1, 2005 12:27 pm
I haven't read Danny's latest blitz. I thought I would post this for reference first and then proceed to see what Danny has given us in his latest posts. ... ...
5500
rlbaty50
Feb 1, 2005 12:55 pm
Now that I have read Danny's latest, I guess it is back to square one with him. Longsuffering that we are, we will keep trying. The fact of the matter is we...
5501
rlbaty50
Feb 1, 2005 1:05 pm
... That struck me as kinda odd, and I was going to comment, then changed ... I thought we had concluded that in order to be valid, the premises didn't have to...
5502
Todd S. Greene
greeneto
Feb 1, 2005 2:16 pm
... [snip] Hi, Robert. I'm address the logic of the first premise. Let's think of it like this... For our first premise we have "If P, then Q," or translated: ...
5503
Tamara
legal_author
Feb 1, 2005 2:59 pm
That is indeed a fine hat, Danny. :-) Best, Tamara ... From: Todd S. Greene To: Maury_and_Baty@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 12:15 AM ...
5504
dfyffe1
dfyffe1@...
Feb 1, 2005 3:04 pm
... changed ... to ... that. ... Robert: Remember several days ago when I "prophesied" that you and Todd would soon be at odds? Look at what you wrote. This is...
5505
Tamara
legal_author
Feb 1, 2005 3:06 pm
OOPS, I meant Todd, as in "That is indeed a fine hat, Todd." I don't know what Danny's hat may look like, if indeed he even has one. Best, Tamara ... From:...
5506
dfyffe1
dfyffe1@...
Feb 1, 2005 3:25 pm
Robert: Asked and answered. I have said you must agree with "if". Since you throw all these "ifs" in, who can disagree? However, you act like these two are the...
5507
rlbaty50
Feb 1, 2005 3:30 pm
... Well, actually, we know that that is simply not true. Danny Fyffe has already admitted to seeking out Gil Yoder and wanting to try his hand with Dr. Fox...
5508
rlbaty50
Feb 1, 2005 3:46 pm
... OK, let's try this again. I am proposing that the major premise of "Goliath" is true. Danny Fyffe says, "Who can disagree"! ... So, I say it is true, and...
5509
rlbaty50
Feb 1, 2005 5:46 pm
... OK, I think you are getting in over my pay grade, but I'll try to figure it out. See how I do. The point you are trying to make is different from the...
5510
Todd S. Greene
greeneto
Feb 1, 2005 6:27 pm
... Hi, Robert. In reviewing the details of the terminilogy, I concede that my statement above is NOT correct. For a reference on this, check the following: ...
5511
rlbaty50
Feb 1, 2005 6:39 pm
... and ... and ... and ... How about that. . .I've got you and Danny Fyffe both on the ropes. Is there no one able to match me and my "Goliath"?? :o) HMM!...
5512
mathewmaury
Feb 1, 2005 8:24 pm
... The 'major premise' as stated above is not true. The conclusion is non sequitur (ask Tamara what that means if you do not know). The argument is not valid....
5513
Todd S. Greene
greeneto
Feb 1, 2005 8:25 pm
In post #5511, Robert Baty wrote, "How about that... I've got you and Danny Fyffe both on the ropes." Look at that, Danny! Now we're both getting our lumps...
5514
rlbaty50
Feb 1, 2005 8:33 pm
... <sqi7o0hh02@s...> wrote: (snip) See proper thread for my response. Robert...
5515
rlbaty50
Feb 1, 2005 8:42 pm
... Are we going to have go through all of that again with "Mathewmaury"? I have proposed that it is true, and Danny Fyffe wonders who could disagree? Maybe...
5516
mathewmaury
Feb 1, 2005 9:25 pm
... An attempt has been made to fit this argument into form of modus ponens. This argument is not modus ponens. I have summarized the Goliath argument below in...
5517
dfyffe1
dfyffe1@...
Feb 1, 2005 9:33 pm
... wanting ... Robert: That is a flat out lie! I spoke with Gil to test your asertion that he taught you logic. Stop lying Robert. Danny Fyffe...
5518
rlbaty@...
rlbaty50
Feb 1, 2005 9:43 pm
... Has anybody else browsed Danny Fyffe's debate record with the Catholics. Seems they had the same sort of problems with him that we are having. Why is it so...
5519
rlbaty@...
rlbaty50
Feb 1, 2005 9:53 pm
... Well, maybe if "Mathewmaury" can sell that to the "young-earth, creation-science" movement, I can go out of business. If he gets the movement to give up...
5520
rlbaty@...
rlbaty50
Feb 1, 2005 9:54 pm
See the proper thread for my response to "Mathewmaury"s latest. Robert...
5521
rlbaty@...
rlbaty50
Feb 1, 2005 11:08 pm
... That's modus ponens, and that's "Goliath" ... I "got" Danny! I even "got" Todd. I guess it is now time to "get" "Mathewmaury". We might have something to...
5522
rlbaty@...
rlbaty50
Feb 2, 2005 12:35 am
Just something to possibly look forward to at the appropriate time. . ... Hey, I think there may also be something to that boxing metaphor Danny said he was...
5523
mathewmaury
Feb 2, 2005 12:36 am
... This argument is not modus ponens. This argument is not valid. What does it mean to be valid? A quote from source --> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Validity...
