Scroll all the way thru for UPDATES!


   Graphic version of this and more also at
   http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TerryLiberty/



   ONN: Onion News Network....

   In The Know: Our Troops In Iraq


   InterNetPlayback (less than two minutes)



   http://www.theonion.com/content/video/in_the_know_our_troops_in_iraq








   GoogleZon: the Future of 'News' Media
Requires flash player and sound on
http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/epic



   WaterGate: Austin TX 2007.03.24
Journalists Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein visited the University of Texas to
unveil documents surrounding Deep Throat. These files and clippings concerning
Deep Throat, now identified as former-FBI number two man Mark Felt, will be on
display at the Harry Ransom Center. Woodward and Bernstein addressed the crowd,
telling them, "Watergate is never over." StoryPic&Video at
http://www.news8austin.com/content/top_stories/default.asp?ArID=181322



   Antiwar Radio: Scott Horton

     DailyAt http://antiwar.com/blog/category/antiwar-radio




   LIVE UNSCREENED Call-in TV

   Phone 477.ACTV (1.512.477.2288)
     April 1 Sunday 10pm Central Time


     on Time Warner Austin Cable TV 10
AND...   (Worldwide)
Peer 2 Peer: AustinLibertyInterNet Radio/TV*




       Sunday on 'Jeff Davis Show'
    http://hometown.aol.com/tfijdshow/



   NowAlsoOn www.YouTube.com
   Jeff Davis Show" videos on youtube
   http://youtube.com/profile?user=jeffdavisshow


   with Terry Liberty Parker of  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian




   Crank up yer webcam as we experiment with YOUR face LIVE on TV


     Look for me (especially Sunday eves) as:

   TxLiberty on Yahoo Messenger & MSN Messenger

   Terry Liberty Parker on Skype
   (supports multiple platforms like
   MAC & Linux along with Windows)

   and maybe AustinLiberty on AIM





   on LAST Week's Show (viral vid candidate?):

   US Marine Sgt/Afghanistan veteran leads demonstration
   of cadence call 'Napalm Sticks to Babies'
   WindowsMedia 800k dwnld, playback 43 seconds
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/JD070325NapalmCadence.wmv


   WindowsMedia Download Playback of THIS show soon after ending as
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/JD070401.wmv



     free FROM: AustinLibertyInterNet Radio/TV
at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LibertyProspects/links


   (Due to popular demand, the system is often too busy to respond; so try back
often.  Right click playbacks to 'save target as...' to download selections to
your computer for replay later at your convenience and as often as you want)








   HBO Real Time with Bill Maher: 2007.03.31 Ron Paul
Guests: US Congressman, Ron Paul, Republican antiwar, anti-'Patriot Act' & drug
prohibition repeal advocate! Former US Scty of StateMadeleine Albright.
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/HBOMaher070330RonPaul.wmv




   ABC Nightline: 2007.03.27
the Onion News Network on TV; Pesos for Pizza and more
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/ABCntln070327onn.wmv


Daily Show / Colbert Report: 2007.03.29
Karl Rove does 'rap' performance, Author Philip Zimbardo and Author Clive James
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/DSClbRpt070329.wmv




   DiscoveryChannel: Human 2.0 (Download ONLY)
Speculating how biology and technology will be combined to create a new kind of
human and consciousness. (2007)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/DSCHuman2point0h.wmv



22ndCentury: World Wide Mind
Debut: A speculative look at scientific advances over the next 100 years. First
up: a theory that all willing human minds can be connected, like computers
linked via the Internet. (2007.01.17)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/2200WorldWideMind.wmv



SouthPark: Red Hot Catholic Love / The Snuke
[2Episdodes] 1. Red Hot Catholic Love: A priest visits South Park to find out
why church attendance is down; the boys protest the tinkering of their favorite
movies. (2002) 2. The Snuke: Hillary Clinton makes a campaign stop in South
Park. Meanwhile, Cartman believes he's uncovered a terrorist plot. (2007)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/SPx2CatholicSnuke.wmv


Execution of Saddam by Hanging Video
find the unedited cell phone cam clips that govt licenced TV networks are too
hypocritically wimpy to show to completion.
http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=Saddam+hang&hl=en




   NOTE: if any of these LoRez internet playbacks stimulate your interest in
getting a clearer copy, please 'Google' that selection to locate a legal source
if one is not otherwise given already.




   Best in Broadcast Journalism: Telling the Truth
CNN's Christiane Amanpour profiles the winners of the Alfred I. duPont-Columbia
University Awards for excellence in broadcast journalism to learn the
backstories of the award-winning reports about Katrina, Baghdad ER and others
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/TellingTruthBestBroadcastJo\
urnalismH.wmv




   Generation Next: Speak Up, Be Heard
Journalist Judy Woodruff travels across the U.S. to interview young adults about
their views on technology, social concerns and the future of the U.S. (2007)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/PBSGenNext.wmv


Free Speech: Jim Lehrer and Ben Bradlee
The state of journalism is examined by the Washington Post's legendary former
executive editor Ben Bradlee and Jim Lehrer. Included: celebrity journalism; and
the use of anonymous sources. Also: how journalists can maintain the public's
trust. (2006)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/FreeSpeechLehrerBradlee.wmv


BeyondTV: Where Television Meets The Internet
Podcasters Juan Garcia and Tom Parish demonstrate how to deliver video over the
Internet. Learn about blogs and other techniques to syndicate video on the Web
(2006.09.28)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/PACT060928.wmv


PBS Charlie Rose: 2006.07.22
Rupert Mudock on new and old media
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/RoseMurdock.wmv


Frontline News War: Secrets, Sources & Spin Part 1 of 3 (Download ONLY)
Lowell Bergman examines challenges facing the news media, including its
relationship with the Bush administration; the use of anonymous sources; and the
CIA leak case and its consequences. Included: comments from Patrick Buchanan;
Mark McKinnon, a former media adviser to President George W. Bush; William
Safire; and New York Times reporter James Risen, who helped break the NSA
wiretapping story. (2007.02.13)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/FrontlineNewsWar1h.wmv


Frontline News War: Secrets, Sources & Spin Part 2 of 3 (Download ONLY)
Lowell Bergman examines the news media, including what some see as a disturbing
trend: the jailing of journalists who refuse to reveal their sources. Included:
comments from the San Francisco Chronicle's Mark Fainaru-Wada and Lance
Williams, who were subpoenaed after reporting on the BALCO investigation,
targeting steroids and athletes; ex-Whitewater prosecutor Stephen Bates; the
Washington Post's Bob Woodward; blogger Josh Wolf; and former New York Times
columnist William Safire. (2007.02.20)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/FrontlineNewsWar2h.wmv


Frontline News War: Secrets, Sources & Spin Part 3 of 3 (Download ONLY)
Conclusion: What's Happening to the News? Lowell Bergman examines the economic
pressures the news industry faces because of aging audiences and the Internet.
Included: comments from "Daily Show" head writer David Javerbaum; Ted Koppel;
former L.A. Times managing editor Dean Baquet, who was fired after a dispute
about staffing cuts; "60 Minutes" executive producer Jeff Fager; Google CEO Eric
Schmidt; Daily Kos' Markos Moulitsas; and former L.A. Times editor John Carroll.
(2007.02.27) Updated to correct file content (wrong show) 2007.03.02
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/FrontlineNewsWar3h.wmv


Frontline/World News War: Stories From a Small Planet
Lowell Bergman examines the global media. Included: Al Jazeera and how it has
changed the media landscape; the South Korean online newspaper OhmyNews, which
encourages "citizen journalists" to contribute stories. (2007)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/FrontlineNewsWarSmallPlanet\
.wmv



   MadeUpNews: Tikrit Titles
Attempting to understand
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/MadeUpNews.wmv




   Also See Much More In Folder:
*Featured in AustinLibertyInterNet Radio/TV
Some more recent additions, upgrades or items otherwise of special interest;
before they are re-distributed to other folders in this collection.
   AND the folder
  War & Peace
Initiating physical assault upon innocent persons is wrong




   HistoryChannel: Black Aviators- Flying Free (Download ONLY)
Classroom : Black aviation pioneers, including the Tuskegee Airmen; Eugene
Bullard, who flew 20 combat missions in France and earned the country's highest
military honor; and Bessie Coleman, the first black woman to pilot a plane, who
opened a flight school for blacks. Also: Hubert Fauntleroy Julian, James Herman
Banning and Frank Peterson. (2001)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/HCBlackAviatorsFlyFreeH.wmv


   MilitaryIndustrialComplex: Why We Fight
In a nationally televised 'farewell' address on January 17, 1961, only four days
before John F. Kennedy's inaugural, two term 1950s US Prez Dwight Eisenhower,
who was also a 4 star General and Supreme Commander of the Allied assault
against Hitler in WWII, warned of the dangers of 'undue influence' exerted by
the 'military-industrial complex' (he would know, afterall)
   MoreAt http://www.worldpolicy.org/journal/hartung01.html
   AddressTextAt http://www.eisenhower.utexas.edu/farewell.htm
   WikipediaAt http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military-industrial_complex
   FlashPlaybackAt
http://www.sonyclassics.com/whywefight/main.html




   NOTE: if any of these LoRez internet playbacks stimulate your interest in
getting a clearer copy, please 'Google' that selection to locate a legal source
if one is not otherwise given already.




   Chinatown (Download ONLY)
Screenwriter Robert Towne won an Oscar for this story of murder in 1930s Los
Angeles, directed by Roman Polanski. Gittes: Jack Nicholson. Evelyn: Faye
Dunaway. Cross: John Huston. Escobar: Perry Lopez. Ida: Diane Ladd. Yelburton:
John Hillerman. Man with Knife: Roman Polanski. Walsh: Joe Mantell. Duffy: Bruce
Glover. Jerry Goldsmith composed the score. Cast & Credits: Jack Nicholson, Faye
Dunaway, John Huston, Perry Lopez, Diane Ladd (1974)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/ChinatownH.wmv




   WaterGate: Austin TX 2007.03.23
Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein were in town Friday for the release of their
papers regarding Mark Felt, the man once known only as Deep Throat and who
secretly helped them in uncovering the Watergate abuses. In October 1972 they
wrote these words in The Washington Post: "FBI agents have established that the
Watergate bugging incident stemmed from a massive campaign of political spying
and sabotage conducted on behalf of President Nixon's re-election and directed
by officials of the White House and the Committee for the Re-Election of the
President." That was the beginning of the end for US Prez Richard Millhouse
Nixon. They also talked about what they viewed as more contemporary abuses.
MoreInfoAt http://www.kxan.com/global/story.asp?s=6272970 Download WindowsMedia
2 minute playback
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/WatergateAustin070323.wmv


WaterGate: All the President's Men (Download ONLY)
Alan J. Pakula's account of the Watergate scandal as uncovered by Bob Woodward
(Robert Redford) and Carl Bernstein (Dustin Hoffman). Jason Robards (Best
Supporting Actor), Martin Balsam, Jack Warden, Hal Holbrook, Jane Alexander.
Oscar-winning script by William Goldman, who adapted Woodward and Bernstein's
book. Cast & Credits: Robert Redford, Dustin Hoffman, Jason Robards, Jack
Warden, Martin Balsam (1976)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/AllThePresidentsMenH.wmv



   Nixon: A Presidency Revealed (Download ONLY)
HistoryChannel: A retrospective on former president Richard Nixon's terms in
office recalls his rise in politics and the mistrust and hatred that led to the
Watergate scandal and brought down his presidency. Included: taped conversations
between Nixon and his aides in the Oval Office and at Camp David. Among those
commenting: Henry Kissinger; Charles Colson; Alexander Haig; John Dean; Ben
Bradlee; and author Robert Dallek. (2007)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/HCNixonPrezH.wmv




PBS Charlie Rose: Make & Distribute a Movie
Morgan Freeman promotes 'ClickStar' to download movies within weeks of release
to theatres (2006.11.29)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/PBSRoseClickStar.wmv


DiscoveryChannel: Careers in Film (Download ONLY)
Assignment Discovery: Careers in film include producing, acting and set
designing. (2006)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/DSCcareersFilmVH.wmv


the Front (Download ONLY)
A cashier (Woody Allen) sells scripts for blacklisted writers during the
McCarthy era. Zero Mostel, Herschel Bernardi, Michael Murphy, Andrea Marcovicci.
Hennessey: Remak Ramsay. Myer: Marvin Lichterman. Delaney: Lloyd Gough. Directed
by Martin Ritt. Cast & Credits: Woody Allen, Zero Mostel, Herschel Bernardi,
Michael Murphy, Andrea Marcovicci (1976)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/theFrontH.wmv


StarTrekVGR: Cost of Conscience (Download ONLY)
(aka: Latent Image) The Doctor (Robert Picardo) discovers his short-term memory
buffer has been altered, so he attempts to investigate who---or what---has
caused it. Ensign Jetal: Nancy Bell. Naomi: Scarlett Pomers. Janeway: Kate
Mulgrew. Chakotay: Robert Beltran. Cast & Credits: Kate Mulgrew, Robert Beltran,
Tim Russ, Ethan Phillips, Robert Picardo
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/StarTrekVgrLatentImagesH.wm\
v


When Life Was Young
Former Life magazine photojournalists Loomis Dean, Wayne Miller, Jon Brenneis
and Joe Munroe recall some of their notable assignments. (2006)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/WhenLifeWasYoung.wmv


PBS Charlie Rose 2007.03.16
Photographer Taryn Simon and Time magazine managing editor Richard Stengel are
the guests. InterNet & changing Time, photography & Chris Rock
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/PBSRose070316.wmv




     It Happened One Night (Download ONLY)
Oscar winner about a madcap heiress (Claudette Colbert) running away from her
father, and the reporter (Clark Gable) on her trail. Walter Connolly, Roscoe
Karns. Danker: Alan Hale. Westley: Jameson Thomas. Bus Driver: Ward Bond. Frank
Capra directed. Cast & Credits: Claudette Colbert, Clark Gable, Walter Connolly,
Jason Thomas, Roscoe Karns (1934)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/ItHappenedOneNightVH.wmv





Network (Download ONLY)
Due to my recording error (selected 'voice ONLY' setting instead of 'audio with
voice emphasis'), audio is sub-standard though voices are ok! This scathing
satire on the television industry earned Oscars for Peter Finch, Faye Dunaway,
Beatrice Straight and writer Paddy Chayefsky. William Holden, Robert Duvall, Ned
Beatty, Wesley Addy, William Prince. Khan: Arthur Burghardt. Sidney Lumet
directed. Cast & Credits: Peter Finch, Faye Dunaway, Beatrice Straight, William
Holden, Robert Duvall (1976)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/NetworkH.wmv


One True Thing (Download ONLY)
An ambitious journalist (Renee Zellweger) gets to know her parents as people
when she returns home to care for her cancer-stricken mother (Best Actress
nominee Meryl Streep). Strong cast, gutwrenching script. George: William Hurt.
Brian: Tom Everett Scott. Carl Franklin directed. Cast & Credits: Renee
Zellweger, Meryl Streep, William Hurt, Tom Everett Scott, Lauren Graham (1998)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/1TrueThingH.wmv




   Cold Mountain (Download ONLY)
While waiting for her beau (Jude Law) to return from the Civil War, a woman
(Nicole Kidman) struggles to keep her farm afloat. Stirring epic with Renée
Zellweger (Best Supporting Actress). The film was nominated for six other
Oscars, including Best Cinematography. Anthony Minghella ("The English Patient")
directed. Donald Sutherland, Philip Seymour Hoffman. Rocker Jack White, of the
White Stripes, costars as a musician and performs "Never Far Away." Cast &
Credits: Nicole Kidman, Jude Law, Renee Zellweger, Donald Sutherland, Ray
Winstone (2003)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/ColdMountainH.wmv




DemocracyNow: 2007.02.15 (15 minute excerpt)
Perhaps no musical act has paid a bigger price for speaking out against war than
the Dixie Chicks, the biggest selling female music group of all time and the big
winners at the Grammy Awards on Sunday. They have been largely blacklisted since
the eve of the U.S. invasion of Iraq in March 2003. That's when the group’s lead
singer - Natalie Maines - said the group was against the war and ashamed that
the President Bush is from Texas. Barbara Kopple joins us to talk about her new
documentary, “Shut Up & Sing”, which chronicles the period since. MoreInfoAt
http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=07/02/15/1528222 WindowsMedia
download/playback at
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/DN070215DixieChicks.wmv

   Dixie Chicks Tonite!
An evening with the Dixie Chicks. The popular country trio performs songs from
their 2002 CD, "Home," along with past favorites, in this spirited concert in
L.A. Songs include "Long Time Gone," "Landslide," "Truth No. 2," "White Trash
Wedding," "Godspeed (Sweet Dreams)," "Cowboy Take Me Away," "Goodbye Earl," "Top
of the World" and "Sin Wagon." (2002)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/PBSDixieChicks.wmv

Dixie Chicks Tonite! (Higher Speed Ver)
Download ONLY (aprx 150mb) to playback on your computer (at aprx 250kbps)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/PBSDixieChicksH.wmv



   Austin City Limits: The Dixie Chicks (Download ONLY)
The Dixie Chicks perform selections from the 2006 "Taking the Long Way" album,
plus older songs. The set includes "Lubbock or Leave It"; "Truth No. 2"; "Long
Time Gone"; "Silent House"; "Not Ready to Make Nice"; "Easy Silence"; "The Long
Way Around"; "White Trash Wedding"; "Travelin' Soldier"; and "Mississippi."
(2007.01.20)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/ACLtheDixieChicksH.wmv





       Also See Much More In Folder:
   *Featured in AustinLibertyInterNet Radio/TV
Some more recent additions, upgrades or items otherwise of special interest;
before they are re-distributed to other folders in this collection.

   AND in the folder....
    War & Peace
Initiating physical assault upon innocent persons is wrong


       free FROM: AustinLibertyInterNet Radio/TV
at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LibertyProspects/links


   (Due to popular demand, the system is often too busy to respond; so try back
often.  Right click playbacks to 'save target as...' to download selections to
your computer for replay later at your convenience and as often as you want)






                         * 'PeerCasting' continuously now as
'AustinLibertyInterNet'
via 'Yellow Pages' at www.PeerCast.org

Distributed networking like www.PeerCast.org may enable people to
create an alternative to govt licenced & controlled broadcasting.
That can be useful when promoting things that challenge, or may be
inconvenient to, established  authority :)
Please test this (at various times as needed) as an audience member
(or even another 'caster) and let me know of your experience(s).


   ExploreAt http://www.peercast.org/
get a very small self installing program
then select 'yellow pages'
to find 'AustinLibertyInterNet' webcasting
as an experiment by me in 'distributed networking'
then please let me know of your experience















     -Terry Liberty Parker
AND Find More Free On-demand Playbacks On-line via
AustinLibertyInterNet Radio/TV
at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LibertyProspects/links VoiceCall 1.512.462.1776

     every Sunday 7pm (central) to ?
I host informal discussion
to which all are welcome
who want to consider ideas & issues
of Liberty & Justice for ALL

   ON-LINE:

       Look for me (especially Sunday eves) as:

   TxLiberty on Yahoo Messenger




   PicAt http://www.dailykos.com/story/2005/11/9/174518/797











---------------------------------
Need Mail bonding?
Go to the Yahoo! Mail Q&A for great tips from Yahoo! Answers users.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Graphic version of this and more also at
   http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TerryLiberty/



   The Onion Rebuffs TV Networks;
   Creates Hilarious Online News Channel

   Jon Stewart better watch out. The Onion News Network is funny, as sharp-witted
as "The Colbert Report" and as topical as "The Daily Show." In its first day on
the air, the satirical web-based news segments manage to effectively skewer
President Bush's troop surge, the immigration debate and American foreign
diplomacy.

   MoreAt
http://www.thedailyreel.com/news-opinion/reel-focus/the-onion-rebuffs-tv-network\
s-creates-online-news-channel?gnewsid=1175028218.17



   GoogleZon: the Future of 'News' Media
Requires flash player and sound on
http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/epic



   WaterGate: Austin TX 2007.03.24
Journalists Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein visited the University of Texas to
unveil documents surrounding Deep Throat. These files and clippings concerning
Deep Throat, now identified as former-FBI number two man Mark Felt, will be on
display at the Harry Ransom Center. Woodward and Bernstein addressed the crowd,
telling them, "Watergate is never over." StoryPic&Video at
http://www.news8austin.com/content/top_stories/default.asp?ArID=181322



   Antiwar Radio: Scott Horton

     DailyAt http://antiwar.com/blog/category/antiwar-radio




   LIVE UNSCREENED Call-in TV

   Phone 477.ACTV (1.512.477.2288)
     April 1 Sunday 10pm Central Time


     on Time Warner Austin Cable TV 10
AND...   (Worldwide)
Peer 2 Peer: AustinLibertyInterNet Radio/TV*




       Sunday on 'Jeff Davis Show'
    http://hometown.aol.com/tfijdshow/



   NowAlsoOn www.YouTube.com
   Jeff Davis Show" videos on youtube
   http://youtube.com/profile?user=jeffdavisshow


   with Terry Liberty Parker of  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian




   Crank up yer webcam as we experiment with YOUR face LIVE on TV


     Look for me (especially Sunday eves) as:

   TxLiberty on Yahoo Messenger & MSN Messenger

   Terry Liberty Parker on Skype
   (supports multiple platforms like
   MAC & Linux along with Windows)

   and maybe AustinLiberty on AIM





   on LAST Week's Show (viral vid candidate?):

   US Marine Sgt/Afghanistan veteran leads demonstration
   of cadence call 'Napalm Sticks to Babies'
   WindowsMedia 800k dwnld, playback 43 seconds
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/JD070325NapalmCadence.wmv


   WindowsMedia Download Playback of THIS show soon after ending as
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/JD070401.wmv



     free FROM: AustinLibertyInterNet Radio/TV
at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LibertyProspects/links


   (Due to popular demand, the system is often too busy to respond; so try back
often.  Right click playbacks to 'save target as...' to download selections to
your computer for replay later at your convenience and as often as you want)








   ABC Nightline: 2007.03.27
the Onion News Network on TV; Pesos for Pizza and more
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/ABCntln070327onn.wmv




   Daily Show / Colbert Report: 2007.03.29
Karl Rove does 'rap' performance, Author Philip Zimbardo and Author Clive James
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/DSClbRpt070329.wmv




   22ndCentury: World Wide Mind
Debut: A speculative look at scientific advances over the next 100 years. First
up: a theory that all willing human minds can be connected, like computers
linked via the Internet. (2007.01.17)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/2200WorldWideMind.wmv




   SouthPark: Red Hot Catholic Love / The Snuke
[2Episdodes] 1. Red Hot Catholic Love: A priest visits South Park to find out
why church attendance is down; the boys protest the tinkering of their favorite
movies. (2002) 2. The Snuke: Hillary Clinton makes a campaign stop in South
Park. Meanwhile, Cartman believes he's uncovered a terrorist plot. (2007)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/SPx2CatholicSnuke.wmv




   Execution of Saddam by Hanging Video
find the unedited cell phone cam clips that govt licenced TV networks are too
hypocritically wimpy to show to completion.
http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=Saddam+hang&hl=en




   NOTE: if any of these LoRez internet playbacks stimulate your interest in
getting a clearer copy, please 'Google' that selection to locate a legal source
if one is not otherwise given already.




   Generation Next: Speak Up, Be Heard
Journalist Judy Woodruff travels across the U.S. to interview young adults about
their views on technology, social concerns and the future of the U.S. (2007)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/PBSGenNext.wmv




   Free Speech: Jim Lehrer and Ben Bradlee
The state of journalism is examined by the Washington Post's legendary former
executive editor Ben Bradlee and Jim Lehrer. Included: celebrity journalism; and
the use of anonymous sources. Also: how journalists can maintain the public's
trust. (2006)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/FreeSpeechLehrerBradlee.wmv




   BeyondTV: Where Television Meets The Internet
Podcasters Juan Garcia and Tom Parish demonstrate how to deliver video over the
Internet. Learn about blogs and other techniques to syndicate video on the Web
(2006.09.28)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/PACT060928.wmv




   PBS Charlie Rose: 2006.07.22
Rupert Mudock on new and old media
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/RoseMurdock.wmv




   Frontline News War: Secrets, Sources & Spin Part 1 of 3 (Download ONLY)
Lowell Bergman examines challenges facing the news media, including its
relationship with the Bush administration; the use of anonymous sources; and the
CIA leak case and its consequences. Included: comments from Patrick Buchanan;
Mark McKinnon, a former media adviser to President George W. Bush; William
Safire; and New York Times reporter James Risen, who helped break the NSA
wiretapping story. (2007.02.13)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/FrontlineNewsWar1h.wmv




   Frontline News War: Secrets, Sources & Spin Part 2 of 3 (Download ONLY)
Lowell Bergman examines the news media, including what some see as a disturbing
trend: the jailing of journalists who refuse to reveal their sources. Included:
comments from the San Francisco Chronicle's Mark Fainaru-Wada and Lance
Williams, who were subpoenaed after reporting on the BALCO investigation,
targeting steroids and athletes; ex-Whitewater prosecutor Stephen Bates; the
Washington Post's Bob Woodward; blogger Josh Wolf; and former New York Times
columnist William Safire. (2007.02.20)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/FrontlineNewsWar2h.wmv




   Frontline News War: Secrets, Sources & Spin Part 3 of 3 (Download ONLY)
Conclusion: What's Happening to the News? Lowell Bergman examines the economic
pressures the news industry faces because of aging audiences and the Internet.
Included: comments from "Daily Show" head writer David Javerbaum; Ted Koppel;
former L.A. Times managing editor Dean Baquet, who was fired after a dispute
about staffing cuts; "60 Minutes" executive producer Jeff Fager; Google CEO Eric
Schmidt; Daily Kos' Markos Moulitsas; and former L.A. Times editor John Carroll.
(2007.02.27) Updated to correct file content (wrong show) 2007.03.02
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/FrontlineNewsWar3h.wmv




   Frontline/World News War: Stories From a Small Planet
Lowell Bergman examines the global media. Included: Al Jazeera and how it has
changed the media landscape; the South Korean online newspaper OhmyNews, which
encourages "citizen journalists" to contribute stories. (2007)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/FrontlineNewsWarSmallPlanet\
.wmv





   Also See Much More In Folder:
*Featured in AustinLibertyInterNet Radio/TV
Some more recent additions, upgrades or items otherwise of special interest;
before they are re-distributed to other folders in this collection.
   AND the folder
  War & Peace
Initiating physical assault upon innocent persons is wrong




   MadeUpNews: Tikrit Titles
Attempting to understand
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/MadeUpNews.wmv




   HistoryChannel: Black Aviators- Flying Free (Download ONLY)
Classroom : Black aviation pioneers, including the Tuskegee Airmen; Eugene
Bullard, who flew 20 combat missions in France and earned the country's highest
military honor; and Bessie Coleman, the first black woman to pilot a plane, who
opened a flight school for blacks. Also: Hubert Fauntleroy Julian, James Herman
Banning and Frank Peterson. (2001)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/HCBlackAviatorsFlyFreeH.wmv




   MilitaryIndustrialComplex: Why We Fight
In a nationally televised 'farewell' address on January 17, 1961, only four days
before John F. Kennedy's inaugural, two term 1950s US Prez Dwight Eisenhower,
who was also a 4 star General and Supreme Commander of the Allied assault
against Hitler in WWII, warned of the dangers of 'undue influence' exerted by
the 'military-industrial complex' (he would know, afterall)
   MoreAt http://www.worldpolicy.org/journal/hartung01.html
   AddressTextAt http://www.eisenhower.utexas.edu/farewell.htm
   WikipediaAt http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military-industrial_complex
   FlashPlaybackAt
http://www.sonyclassics.com/whywefight/main.html




   NOTE: if any of these LoRez internet playbacks stimulate your interest in
getting a clearer copy, please 'Google' that selection to locate a legal source
if one is not otherwise given already.




   WaterGate: Austin TX 2007.03.23
Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein were in town Friday for the release of their
papers regarding Mark Felt, the man once known only as Deep Throat and who
secretly helped them in uncovering the Watergate abuses. In October 1972 they
wrote these words in The Washington Post: "FBI agents have established that the
Watergate bugging incident stemmed from a massive campaign of political spying
and sabotage conducted on behalf of President Nixon's re-election and directed
by officials of the White House and the Committee for the Re-Election of the
President." That was the beginning of the end for US Prez Richard Millhouse
Nixon. They also talked about what they viewed as more contemporary abuses.
MoreInfoAt http://www.kxan.com/global/story.asp?s=6272970 Download WindowsMedia
2 minute playback
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/WatergateAustin070323.wmv




   WaterGate: All the President's Men (Download ONLY)
Alan J. Pakula's account of the Watergate scandal as uncovered by Bob Woodward
(Robert Redford) and Carl Bernstein (Dustin Hoffman). Jason Robards (Best
Supporting Actor), Martin Balsam, Jack Warden, Hal Holbrook, Jane Alexander.
Oscar-winning script by William Goldman, who adapted Woodward and Bernstein's
book. Cast & Credits: Robert Redford, Dustin Hoffman, Jason Robards, Jack
Warden, Martin Balsam (1976)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/AllThePresidentsMenH.wmv




   PBS Charlie Rose: Make & Distribute a Movie
Morgan Freeman promotes 'ClickStar' to download movies within weeks of release
to theatres (2006.11.29)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/PBSRoseClickStar.wmv




   DiscoveryChannel: Careers in Film (Download ONLY)
Assignment Discovery: Careers in film include producing, acting and set
designing. (2006)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/DSCcareersFilmVH.wmv




   the Front (Download ONLY)
A cashier (Woody Allen) sells scripts for blacklisted writers during the
McCarthy era. Zero Mostel, Herschel Bernardi, Michael Murphy, Andrea Marcovicci.
Hennessey: Remak Ramsay. Myer: Marvin Lichterman. Delaney: Lloyd Gough. Directed
by Martin Ritt. Cast & Credits: Woody Allen, Zero Mostel, Herschel Bernardi,
Michael Murphy, Andrea Marcovicci (1976)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/theFrontH.wmv




   StarTrekVGR: Cost of Conscience (Download ONLY)
(aka: Latent Image) The Doctor (Robert Picardo) discovers his short-term memory
buffer has been altered, so he attempts to investigate who---or what---has
caused it. Ensign Jetal: Nancy Bell. Naomi: Scarlett Pomers. Janeway: Kate
Mulgrew. Chakotay: Robert Beltran. Cast & Credits: Kate Mulgrew, Robert Beltran,
Tim Russ, Ethan Phillips, Robert Picardo
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/StarTrekVgrLatentImagesH.wm\
v




   When Life Was Young
Former Life magazine photojournalists Loomis Dean, Wayne Miller, Jon Brenneis
and Joe Munroe recall some of their notable assignments. (2006)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/WhenLifeWasYoung.wmv




   PBS Charlie Rose 2007.03.16
Photographer Taryn Simon and Time magazine managing editor Richard Stengel are
the guests. InterNet & changing Time, photography & Chris Rock
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/PBSRose070316.wmv




   Network (Download ONLY)
Due to my recording error (selected 'voice ONLY' setting instead of 'audio with
voice emphasis'), audio is sub-standard though voices are ok! This scathing
satire on the television industry earned Oscars for Peter Finch, Faye Dunaway,
Beatrice Straight and writer Paddy Chayefsky. William Holden, Robert Duvall, Ned
Beatty, Wesley Addy, William Prince. Khan: Arthur Burghardt. Sidney Lumet
directed. Cast & Credits: Peter Finch, Faye Dunaway, Beatrice Straight, William
Holden, Robert Duvall (1976)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/NetworkH.wmv




   One True Thing (Download ONLY)
An ambitious journalist (Renee Zellweger) gets to know her parents as people
when she returns home to care for her cancer-stricken mother (Best Actress
nominee Meryl Streep). Strong cast, gutwrenching script. George: William Hurt.
Brian: Tom Everett Scott. Carl Franklin directed. Cast & Credits: Renee
Zellweger, Meryl Streep, William Hurt, Tom Everett Scott, Lauren Graham (1998)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/1TrueThingH.wmv




   DemocracyNow: 2007.02.15 (15 minute excerpt)
Perhaps no musical act has paid a bigger price for speaking out against war than
the Dixie Chicks, the biggest selling female music group of all time and the big
winners at the Grammy Awards on Sunday. They have been largely blacklisted since
the eve of the U.S. invasion of Iraq in March 2003. That's when the group’s lead
singer - Natalie Maines - said the group was against the war and ashamed that
the President Bush is from Texas. Barbara Kopple joins us to talk about her new
documentary, “Shut Up & Sing”, which chronicles the period since. MoreInfoAt
http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=07/02/15/1528222 WindowsMedia
download/playback at
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/DN070215DixieChicks.wmv



   Dixie Chicks Tonite!
An evening with the Dixie Chicks. The popular country trio performs songs from
their 2002 CD, "Home," along with past favorites, in this spirited concert in
L.A. Songs include "Long Time Gone," "Landslide," "Truth No. 2," "White Trash
Wedding," "Godspeed (Sweet Dreams)," "Cowboy Take Me Away," "Goodbye Earl," "Top
of the World" and "Sin Wagon." (2002)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/PBSDixieChicks.wmv


   Dixie Chicks Tonite! (Higher Speed Ver)
Download ONLY (aprx 150mb) to playback on your computer (at aprx 250kbps)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/PBSDixieChicksH.wmv





       Also See Much More In Folder:
   *Featured in AustinLibertyInterNet Radio/TV
Some more recent additions, upgrades or items otherwise of special interest;
before they are re-distributed to other folders in this collection.

   AND in the folder....
    War & Peace
Initiating physical assault upon innocent persons is wrong


       free FROM: AustinLibertyInterNet Radio/TV
at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LibertyProspects/links


   (Due to popular demand, the system is often too busy to respond; so try back
often.  Right click playbacks to 'save target as...' to download selections to
your computer for replay later at your convenience and as often as you want)






                         * 'PeerCasting' continuously now as
'AustinLibertyInterNet'
via 'Yellow Pages' at www.PeerCast.org

Distributed networking like www.PeerCast.org may enable people to
create an alternative to govt licenced & controlled broadcasting.
That can be useful when promoting things that challenge, or may be
inconvenient to, established  authority :)
Please test this (at various times as needed) as an audience member
(or even another 'caster) and let me know of your experience(s).


   ExploreAt http://www.peercast.org/
get a very small self installing program
then select 'yellow pages'
to find 'AustinLibertyInterNet' webcasting
as an experiment by me in 'distributed networking'
then please let me know of your experience















     -Terry Liberty Parker
AND Find More Free On-demand Playbacks On-line via
AustinLibertyInterNet Radio/TV
at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LibertyProspects/links VoiceCall 1.512.462.1776

     every Sunday 7pm (central) to ?
I host informal discussion
to which all are welcome
who want to consider ideas & issues
of Liberty & Justice for ALL

   ON-LINE:

       Look for me (especially Sunday eves) as:

   TxLiberty on Yahoo Messenger




   PicAt http://www.dailykos.com/story/2005/11/9/174518/797











---------------------------------
Don't pick lemons.
See all the new 2007 cars at Yahoo! Autos.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Howdy, everyone,

I spotted this on The August Review yesterday morning.

http://www.augustreview.com/issues/general/america_plundered_by_the_global_elite\
_2005051812/

Sincerely,
Scott


---------------------------------
Now that's room service! Choose from over 150,000 hotels
in 45,000 destinations on Yahoo! Travel to find your fit.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Howdy, everyone,

I spotted this on The August Review yesterday morning.

http://www.augustreview.com/issues/general/america_plundered_by_the_global_elite\
_2005051812/

Sincerely,
Scott


---------------------------------
Now that's room service! Choose from over 150,000 hotels
in 45,000 destinations on Yahoo! Travel to find your fit.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Howdy, everyone,

I spotted this on The August Review yesterday morning.

http://www.augustreview.com/issues/general/america_plundered_by_the_global_elite\
_2005051812/

Sincerely,
Scott


---------------------------------
Now that's room service! Choose from over 150,000 hotels
in 45,000 destinations on Yahoo! Travel to find your fit.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Howdy, everyone,

I spotted this on The August Review yesterday morning.

http://www.augustreview.com/issues/general/america_plundered_by_the_global_elite\
_2005051812/

Sincerely,
Scott


---------------------------------
Now that's room service! Choose from over 150,000 hotels
in 45,000 destinations on Yahoo! Travel to find your fit.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Rick Stanley
Constitutional Activist
E-mail: rick@...


We the People Scoop 3/25/07

========================================================================
WE THE PEOPLE SCOOP - TO EXPOSE!
**  Visit the website: http://www.stanley2002.org
**  OR Our NEW Offshore Site at http://www.wtpconstitutionalactivism.org
**  Like the Scoop? Forward it to everyone you know!
========================================================================


OPINION RELEASE:   So Simple, So Disturbing


----- Original Message -----
From: "Angela Stark" <angelastark@...>
Subject:   So Simple, So Disturbing


   Sometimes very simple questions can cause profound cognitive
>> dissonance. Here is a series of very simple questions I like to
>> pose to people at random, especially if I want to make their heads
>> explode. (For the record, my head was long ago exploded by these
>> simple concepts, so I'm not claiming superiority here.)
>>
>> 1) Can you delegate to someone else a right which you don't have?
>> For example, if you don't have the right to punch me in the nose
>> (just for fun), can you GIVE the right to do so to someone else?
>>
>> The answer is self-evident: no, you can't. If it's bad for you to
>> do it, you can't make it good for someone else to do it, whether it
>> be murder, assault, theft, vandalism, etc. If it's immoral for YOU
>> to do something, how could you possibly have the ability to make it
>> moral for someone ELSE to do it?
>>
>> 2) Can TWO people delegate a right that neither of them has? For
>> example, if TWO of you want me to be punched in the nose (but
>> neither of you has the right), can you GIVE a third person the
>> right to punch me? What if 50 of you wanted it? How about a million
>> people?
>>
>> Again, the answer is pretty obvious: no, the NUMBER of people who
>> want to do something bad doesn't make it into something good;
>> numbers cannot create the moral RIGHT for someone to do something.
>> And note, I'm talking about moral justification, not mere ability.
>> Almost everyone is ABLE to punch me in the nose--especially if
>> there are a million people who want my nose punched--but that's not
>> the same as having a moral RIGHT to do so. It doesn't matter how
>> big the group gets: if NO ONE in the group has a right to do "A,"
>> then they can't give that right to someone else.
>>
>> Up to this point, most people follow along without much protest.
>> The answers seem patently obvious to almost everyone. However, if I
>> add a third, equally simple question, it sends most people into a
>> philosophical crisis:
>>
>> 3) If people cannot delegate rights they don't have, where did
>> "government" get the right to do what it does?
>>
>> Sure, a few "laws" are just the exercising of rights we all have:
>> the right to defend yourself (or others) against thieves,
>> murderers, invaders, etc. We have the right of self-defense, so--if
>> we feel so inclined--we can delegate that right to someone else.
>> But consider how many so-called "laws" are things which you and I
>> would never dream of doing on our own, because we know we don't
>> have the right.
>>
>> For example, do you personally have the right to demand money from
>> your neighbor, just because you want it? Do you have the right to
>> imprison him for smoking a leaf you don't approve of? To take his
>> money for driving his car without your permission? To tell him what
>> he can eat, where he can live, who he can work for, who he can
>> hire, who he can fire, how he can run his business, what he can
>> sell? And do you have the right to put him in a cage if he chooses
>> to disobey any arbitrary command you care to fling at him? If YOU
>> don't personally have the right to play intrusive control freak,
>> how did those in "government" get the right to do it? Who gave it
>> to them?
>>
>> At this point, many people jump to the popular excuse of necessity.
>> "We NEED to have government doing those things, or there would be
>> .... ANARCHY!" That's nice, but it doesn't answer the question: from
>> whom did they get the right? Based on the self-evident answers to
>> my first two questions, they didn't get the right from YOU, or from
>> any of your six billion neighbors (none of whom have the right
>> themselves). So, where did it come from? A piece of parchment? A
>> magical voting booth? If we mere mortals didn't give them the right
>> (and we didn't), who or what DID?
>>
>> We talk about "representative" government. What does that mean? If
>> someone really "represents" me, he may do only what I may do. For
>> example, I could authorize my "representative" to do business for
>> me. I could do it myself, but I allow him to do it instead. What I
>> may NOT morally do, however, I cannot authorize him to do either.
>> To be a "representative" just means acting on someone else's
>> behalf. If I have no right to do a particular thing, it should be
>> painfully obvious that someone "representing" me doesn't have that
>> right either.
>>
>> So, upon whose behalf are the federal "representatives" acting? If
>> YOU don't personally have the right to "tax" me (and you don't),
>> neither does your "representative." How, then, did we reach a point
>> where almost everyone accepts as indisputable doctrine that our
>> "representatives" have rights that WE DON'T? On its face the idea
>> is absurd, and yet 99.9% of the country unquestioningly accepts it
>> as a given.
>>
>> I'm going to stop there for now, because I have found, after doing
>> this little mental exercise with dozens (if not hundreds) of
>> people, that those few simple concepts are enough to stir up some
>> serious turmoil in the minds of 99% of the people who consider
>> them. Why? Because those few simple, obvious answers very plainly
>> lead to a conclusion that scares the existential heck out of most
>> people. It's so scary, in fact, I won't even say what that
>> conclusion is ... yet.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>>
>>
>> Larken Rose
>> www.tyrantbook.com


======================================================================
Disclaimer: Information shared in the Stanley Scoop is not necessarily
the opinion of the editor or staff.  It is shared for information
purposes only and it is recommended that you come to your own conclusions.
======================================================================
Live Free or Die! Liberty in our Lifetime!
We the People Scoop
http://www.stanley2002.org
http://www.wtpconstitutionalactivism.org
Reply to: rick@...

Also check out The Revolutionary Coalition!
This group is working to unite all third parties that defend the
constitution, independents, and non-voters (making up 60% of
Americans) into one SUPER THIRD PARTY!

On Yahoo groups at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TheRevolutionaryCoalition

This group has a single line platform: "To defend our (Natural)
God-given, unalienable, Constitutionally protected and guaranteed
rights."

Subscribe by sending email to:
therevolutionarycoalition-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

To subscribe to the We the People Constitutional Activism Scoop,
send a message to subscribe@...

If you wish to unsubscribe from We the People Constitutional Activism Scoop,
send a message to unsubscribe@...

All other changes for personal attention, such as changing your email address,
send to
webmaster@...

Be aware that you may be receiving mail forwarded from a group,
in which case you may have to visit http://groups.yahoo.com to unsubscribe.
Please also note that mail sent to our "reply to:" address,
newsletter@... is usually ignored....




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Scroll all the way thru for UPDATES!


   Graphic version of this and more also at
   http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TerryLiberty/



     On last show:

   Marine recruits call cadence: 'Napalm sticks to babies'

   One of them, now ex- US Marine Afghanistan vet, talks

   aprx 3 minute WindowsMedia download/playback
   http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/JD070318a.wmv




     Google: "napalm sticks to babies"




   Antiwar Radio: Scott Horton
   DailyAt http://antiwar.com/blog/category/antiwar-radio




   LIVE UNSCREENED Call-in TV

   Phone 477.ACTV (1.512.477.2288)
     March 25 Sunday 10pm Central Time


     on Time Warner Austin Cable TV 10
AND...   (Worldwide)
Peer 2 Peer: AustinLibertyInterNet Radio/TV*




       Sunday on 'Jeff Davis Show'
    http://hometown.aol.com/tfijdshow/



   NowAlsoOn www.YouTube.com
   Jeff Davis Show" videos on youtube
   http://youtube.com/profile?user=jeffdavisshow


   with Terry Liberty Parker of  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian




   Crank up yer webcam as we experiment with YOUR face LIVE on TV


     Look for me (especially Sunday eves) as:

   TxLiberty on Yahoo Messenger & MSN Messenger

   Terry Liberty Parker on Skype
   (supports multiple platforms like
   MAC & Linux along with Windows)

   and maybe AustinLiberty on AIM






   WindowsMedia Download Playback of THIS show soon after ending as
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/JD070325.wmv



     free FROM: AustinLibertyInterNet Radio/TV
at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LibertyProspects/links


   (Due to popular demand, the system is often too busy to respond; so try back
often.  Right click playbacks to 'save target as...' to download selections to
your computer for replay later at your convenience and as often as you want)








   CBS 60 Minutes: 2007.03.18
Scott Pelley interviews SSgt. Frank Wuterich, who is charged with murder in
connection with some of the 24 Iraqi civilians killed in Haditha, Iraq, in
November 2005
   MoreAt http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/03/15/60minutes/main2574973.shtml
   WindowsMedia download/playback at
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/60min070318IraqMurders.wmv




   PBS Charlie Rose 2007.03.23
Congress passes America's 'get out of Iraq' bill; and Iraq war begins 5th year!
Former Scty of State, Henry Kissenger and John Burns of the NY Times.
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/PBSRose070323.wmv




ABC Nightline: 2007.03.19
On 4yr Iraq war anniversary, a journey into 'darkness'
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/ABCntln070319Iraq5yrStarts.\
wmv




   HistoryChannel: Vietnam Early Hopes
Part 4 of 'The Ten Thousand Day War' traces the early years of U.S. involvement
(1955-63), including its initial support of South Vietnamese President Ngo Dinh
Diem. Richard Basehart is the narrator. (1980)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/VietnamEarlyHopes.wmv




Daily Show / Colbert Report: 2007.03.20
Atty's away then US Ambassador to UN, Joe Bolton (the 'milk mustache' guy) then
Willie Nelson & more
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/DSClbRpt070320WNelson.wmv




   CMT 60 Minutes Special: Willie Nelson Uncut (Download ONLY)
Ed Bradley interviews Willie Nelson on his ranch in Luck, Texas. A portion of
the discussion aired previously on "CBS: 60 Minutes" (2005)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/60minWillieNelsonH.wmv




PBS Charlie Rose 2007.03.21
Global warming then Iraq war perspective by its 'on-site' reporters
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/PBSRose070321.wmv




   NOTE: if any of these LoRez internet playbacks stimulate your interest in
getting a clearer copy, please 'Google' that selection to locate a legal source
if one is not otherwise given already.




   1805: the Battle of Tripoli
the USA-Barbary conflict: From the Halls of Montezuma to the Shores of Tripoli;
Millions for Defense, but Not One Penny for Tribute!
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/TripoliBattle.wmv




   National Geographic: Arlington- Field of Honor
a day at the national cemetery on the Potomac, "where ritual and respect are
woven tightly together," says narrator Frankie R. Faison. The hour interweaves
funerals (including those of a former Vietnam MIA soldier and a soldier who died
in Iraq) and the meticulous preparations for them with a thumbnail history of
Arlington National, the onetime home of George Washington's step-grandson, whose
daughter married Robert E. Lee. President Taft, Joe Louis and Dashiell Hammett
are among the notables buried at Arlington, but the most famous person resting
here is JFK, who visited the cemetery several months before his assassination.
His tour guide recalls the visit: "He said it was so beautiful he could stay
here forever (2004)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/ArlingtonFieldHonor.wmv




USA Marines (Download ONLY)
Director John Grant's documentary examines the culture of being a marine.
Included: recruit training during boot at Parris Island, S.C.; a tour of the
National Museum of the Marine Corps in Triangle, Va. Also: comments from retired
general Michael Hagee, 33rd commandant of the Marine Corps; and military
reporter Thomas Ricks. (2007)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/theMarinesH.wmv




Jarhead: Making of (Download ONLY)
A behind-the-scenes look at the making of "Jarhead," a 2005 drama about a
marine's Desert Storm experiences, directed by Sam Mendes ("American Beauty")
and starring Jake Gyllenhaal and Jamie Foxx. (2005)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/JarheadMakingH.wmv




Jarhead (Download ONLY)
Serviceable soldier story following a third-generation marine (Jake Gyllenhaal)
from boot camp to his job as a sniper during the Gulf War. Jamie Foxx, Peter
Sarsgaard. Directed by Sam Mendes, from a script by William Broyles Jr., who
adapted the military memoir of real-life marine Anthony Swofford (played by
Gyllenhaal). Cast & Credits: Jake Gyllenhaal, Peter Sarsgaard, Lucas Black,
Chris Cooper, Jamie Foxx (2005)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/JarheadVH.wmv




   a Few Good Men
Rob Reiner directed this Oscar nominee about Navy lawyers (Tom Cruise, Demi
Moore) defending two marines accused of murder. Jessep: Jack Nicholson. Ross:
Kevin Bacon. Kendrick: Kiefer Sutherland. Weinberg: Kevin Pollak. Downey: James
Marshall. Cast & Credits: Tom Cruise, Jack Nicholson, Demi Moore, Kevin Bacon,
Kiefer Sutherland (1992)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/aFewGoodMen.wmv




   Also See Much More In Folder:
*Featured in AustinLibertyInterNet Radio/TV
Some more recent additions, upgrades or items otherwise of special interest;
before they are re-distributed to other folders in this collection.
   AND the folder
  War & Peace
Initiating physical assault upon innocent persons is wrong




     Vietnam War in Five Parts
(audio/vid problems, but still 5hrs of worthy content) Part 1 of 5 America
Enters the War: Part 1 examines the U.S. entry into the war in 1965, battles at
the La Drang Valley and Dak To and the beginnings of protests in 1967. Host:
Roger Mudd. (2001) Part 2 of 5 Tet in Saigon and Hue: Part 2 recalls the North
Vietnamese shift from guerrilla warfare to conventional fighting in the cities;
and the 1968 Tet Offensive. Host: Roger Mudd. (2001) Part 3 of 5 Ringing Down
the Curtain: Part 3 examines President Nixon's desire to withdraw troops in
1969; the incursion into Cambodia in 1970; and the Easter Offensive in 1972.
Host: Roger Mudd. (2001) Part 4 of 5 The End Game: Conclusion. The end of the
war is recalled, including the 1975 evacuation of Saigon before the North
Vietnamese captured the city. Host: Roger Mudd. (2001) Part 5 of 5 Declassified:
The 1968 Tet Offensive, a turning point in the Vietnam War, is examined. (2006)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/VietnamWar.wmv





   the Fog of War: Eleven Lessons from the Life of Robert S. McNamara (Download
ONLY)
Errol Morris's powerful Oscar-winning documentary about Robert McNamara, who
served as secretary of defense under Presidents Kennedy and Johnson. The film
also examines U.S. foreign and military policy from World War II to Vietnam
(2003)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/Inetpub/wwwroot/Webfiles/FogOfWarH.wmv




   MilitaryIndustrialComplex: Why We Fight
In a nationally televised 'farewell' address on January 17, 1961, only four days
before John F. Kennedy's inaugural, two term 1950s US Prez Dwight Eisenhower,
who was also a 4 star General and Supreme Commander of the Allied assault
against Hitler in WWII, warned of the dangers of 'undue influence' exerted by
the 'military-industrial complex' (he would know, afterall)
   MoreAt http://www.worldpolicy.org/journal/hartung01.html
   AddressTextAt http://www.eisenhower.utexas.edu/farewell.htm
   WikipediaAt http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military-industrial_complex
   FlashPlaybackAt
http://www.sonyclassics.com/whywefight/main.html




   Fail Safe
Sidney Lumet directed this doomsday thriller about an accidental nuclear attack
on Moscow. Henry Fonda, Walter Matthau, Dan O'Herlihy. Bogan: Frank Overton.
Cascio: Fritz Weaver. Grady: Edward Binns. Buck: Larry Hagman. Stark: Russell
Hardie. Based on the Eugene Burdick-Harvey Wheeler best seller. Cast & Credits:
Walter Matthau, Henry Fonda, Dan O'Herlihy, Frank Overton, Edward Binns (1964)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/FailSafe.wmv




   Dr. Strangelove Or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb (Download
ONLY)
Stanley Kubrick's brilliant "nightmare comedy" about a nuclear crisis
precipitated by a paranoid general. Peter Sellers, George C. Scott, Sterling
Hayden, Keenan Wynn, Slim Pickens. Ambassador: Peter Bull. Miss Scott: Tracy
Reed. Bombadier(and later to become the voice of Darth Vader): James Earl Jones
(1964)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/DrStrangeloveH.wmv




   NOTE: if any of these LoRez internet playbacks stimulate your interest in
getting a clearer copy, please 'Google' that selection to locate a legal source
if one is not otherwise given already.




   Blood of Heroes (Download ONLY)
Futuristic gladiators do battle on post-apocalyptic playing fields. Rutger
Hauer. Kidda: Joan Chen. Young Gar: Vincent D'Onofrio. Big Cimber: Anna
Katarina. Mbulu: Delroy Lindo. Gandhai: Ghandhi MacIntyre. Doy Boy: Justin
Monjo. Cast & Credits: Rutger Hauer, Joan Chen, Vincent D'Onofrio, Anna
Katarina, Delroy Lindo (1990)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/BloodOfHeroesH.wmv




   the Last Samurai (Download ONLY)
Tom Cruise in beautifully haunting tale of 19th century Japan's violent clash of
old and new culture. A disillusioned Civil War vet (Tom Cruise) undergoes a
spiritual rebirth after he's taken prisoner by samurai warriors in 1876 Japan. A
gripping story with sumptuous visuals and textured characters. Oscar nominee Ken
Watanabe adds solid support as a samurai leader. The film scored three other
Oscar nominations, including Best Sound. Edward Zwick directed and co-wrote the
script. Cruise, who also co-produced, spent two years preparing for the role.
Cast & Credits: Tom Cruise, Ken Watanabe, Timothy Spall, Billy Connolly, Tony
Goldwyn (2003)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/LastSamuraiH.wmv




   Winning Your Wings
This 1942 production of the First Motion Picture Unit is a World War II Air
Force recruiting film that was nominated for an Oscar for Best Documentary
Short. Lt. James Stewart narrates.
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/WinWings.wmv




Starship Troopers (Download ONLY)
NOT 'edited for TV' lamaloids! Ultraviolent futuristic thriller about coed
infantry trainees preparing to wipe out mankind's newest enemy: giant bugs from
outer space. Casper Van Dien, Dina Meyer. Carmen: Denise Richards. Ace: Jake
Busey. Zander: Patrick Muldoon. Paul Verhoeven directed. Cast & Credits: Casper
Van Dien, Dina Meyer, Denise Richards, Jake Busey, Neil Patrick Harris (1997)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/StarshipTroopersH.wmv




   Soldier (Download ONLY)
A hardened soldier of the future (Kurt Russell) is abandoned on a remote planet
when a new breed of genetically engineered warriors is introduced. Caine 607:
Jason Scott Lee. Sandra: Connie Nielsen. Church: Gary Busey. Col. Mekum: Jason
Isaacs. Directed by Paul Anderson. Cast & Credits: Kurt Russell, Jason Scott
Lee, Connie Nielsen, Gary Busey, Sean Pertwee (1998)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/SoldierH.wmv




Bully (Download ONLY)
Much sex, drugs & nakedness in this unrated version of Larry Clark's
controversial tale of aimless Florida teens who decide to murder one of their
own, a physical and psychological intimidator (Nick Stahl). Based on a true
story. Brad Renfro, Rachel Miner, Bijou Phillips, Michael Pitt, Kelli Garner,
Leo Fitzpatrick, Daniel Franzese, Nathalie Paulding, Elizabeth Dimon, Jessica
Sutta, Edward Amatrudo, Steven Raulerson, Judith Clayton, Alan Lilly. (2001)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/BullyH.wmv




   Conan the Barbarian (Download ONLY)
Arnold Schwarzenegger in the adventures of an ancient warrior. James Earl Jones,
Max von Sydow, Sandahl Bergman. Rexor: Ben Davidson. Witch: Cassandra Gaviola.
Subotai: Gerry Lopez. John Milius directed. Cast & Credits: Arnold
Schwarzenegger, James Earl Jones, Max von Sydow, Sandahl Bergman, Ben Davidson
(1982)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/ConanVH.wmv




   HistoryChannel: Barbarians II
(4 hours: Franks 300 AD, Saxons 380 AD, Vandals 406 AD, Lombards 488 AD) 1st hr,
FRANKS: examines the Franks and their invasion of Gaul under the leadership of
Merovius and, later, his grandson, Clovis I. 2nd hr, SAXONS: examines the Saxons
and their sweep across Britannia. Included: the long rivalry between Anglo-Saxon
leaders Edwin and Aethelfrith. 3rd hr, VANDALS: Examining the Vandals and their
infiltration into northern Gaul, Spain and North Africa. Included: profiles of
Vandal leaders Gaiseric and his son, Huneric. Narrator: Clancy Brown. 4th hr,
LOMBARDS: A history of the Lombards in the waning Roman Empire and their
conquest of Italy. Included: profiles of Lombard kings Alboin and Liutprand.
(2007)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/HCBarbarians2.wmv




Hollywood Vietnam (Download ONLY)
A look at the film industry's depiction of the Vietnam War. Included: "Platoon,"
"Full Metal Jacket" and "Apocalypse Now" (available on-line here); comments from
veterans about these films; and public perception of the war. Robert Stone
directed. (2005)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/HollywoodVietnamH.wmv




Full Metal Jacket (Download ONLY)
Stanley Kubrick's Vietnam saga follows a group of Marines from boot camp to
combat in Vietnam during the 1968 Tet Offensive. Matthew Modine. Pyle: Vincent
D'Onofrio. Hartman: Lee Ermey. Animal Mother: Adam Baldwin. Eightball: Dorian
Harewood. Rafterman: Kevyn Major Howard. Touchdown: Ed O'Ross. (1987)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/Inetpub/wwwroot/Webfiles/FullMetalJacketH.wmv




Platoon (Download ONLY)
Oliver Stone's Vietnam diary of a green GI (Charlie Sheen) and his good guy/bad
guy sergeants (Willem Dafoe, Tom Berenger). O'Neill: John C. McGinley. Bunny:
Kevin Dillon. Big Harold: Forest Whitaker. Rhah: Francesco Quinn. Cast &
Credits: Charlie Sheen, Willem Dafoe, Tom Berenger, Forest Whitaker, Francesco
Quinn (1986)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/PlatoonVH.wmv




   Born on the Fourth of July (Download ONLY)
Oliver Stone's docudrama about paralyzed Vietnam vet Ron Kovic (Tom Cruise), who
tries to reconcile memories of his idealistic youth with his post-war
disillusionment. Kyra Sedgwick. Mr. Kovic: Raymond J. Barry. Mrs. Kovic:
Caroline Kava. Charlie: Willem Dafoe. Steve: Jerry Levine. Timmy: Frank Whaley.
Recruiting Sergeant: Tom Berenger. Martinez: Jason Gedrick. Marine Major: John
Getz. Stone won a Best Director Oscar. (1989)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/Born4thJulyH.wmv




Casualties of War (Download ONLY)
Brian De Palma directed this story about the rape and murder of a Vietnamese
girl by four U.S. soldiers. Michael J. Fox, Sean Penn. Clark: Don Harvey.
Hatcher: John C. Reilly. Diaz: John Leguizamo. Oahn: Thuy Thu Le. Brown: Erik
King. Rowan: Jack Gwaltney. Reilly: Ving Rhames. Hawthorne: Don Martin.
Screenplay by David Rabe. Cast & Credits: Michael J. Fox, Sean Penn, Don Harvey,
John C. Reilly, John Leguizamo (1989)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/CasualtiesOfWarH.wmv




Apocalypse Now Redux (Download ONLY)
Forty-nine minutes of added footage fleshes out Francis Ford Coppola's gripping,
surreal 1979 Vietnam epic, starring Martin Sheen as a captain sent to terminate
a renegade colonel (Marlon Brando). Robert Duvall. Harrison Ford has a small
role. Based on Joseph Conrad's "Heart of Darkness." Cast & Credits: Martin
Sheen, Marlon Brando, Robert Duvall, Frederic Forrest, Albert Hall (2001)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/ApocalypseNowReduxVH.wmv




   the Crazies (Download ONLY)
Melodrama about the effects of a deadly virus unleashed on a small community.
Lane Carroll. David: W.G. McMillan. Clank: Harold Wayne Jones. Colonel: Lloyd
Hollar. Artie: Richard Liberty. Kathie: Lynn Lowry. Dr. Watts: Richard France.
Rider: Harry Spillman. Directed by George Romero. Cast & Credits: Lane Carroll,
W.G. McMillan, Harold Wayne Jones, Lloyd Hollar, Richard Liberty (1973)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/theCraziesH.wmv




American Graffiti (Download ONLY)
George Lucas co-wrote and directed this acclaimed music-packed comedy-drama
about teenage life in 1962 California, starring Richard Dreyfuss and Ron Howard.
The impressive ensemble cast also includes Harrison Ford, Cindy Williams and
Mackenzie Phillips. Look for Suzanne Somers as the elusive blonde in the T-Bird.
The film was nominated for five Oscars, including Best Picture. Francis Ford
Coppola produced. Cast & Credits: Richard Dreyfuss, Ron Howard, Paul Le Mat,
Cindy Williams, Harrison Ford (1973)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/AmericanGraffitiH.wmv




   Stripes (Download ONLY)
Service farce with Bill Murray as the rawest of recruits. Harold Ramis, Warren
Oates, P.J. Soles. Louise: Sean Young. Ox: John Candy. Stillman: John
Larroquette. Aide: John Voldstad. Ivan Reitman directed. Cast & Credits: Bill
Murray, Harold Ramis, Warren Oates, P.J. Soles, Sean Young (1981)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/StripesH.wmv




Broken Flowers (Download ONLY)
Screenwriter-director Jim Jarmusch's witty, restrained road movie about a
wealthy, aging Casanova (Bill Murray) who seeks out his former lovers when he
learns he might be a father. A great supporting cast, including Jeffrey Wright,
Sharon Stone and Jessica Lange. Written by Jarmusch, who won a Grand Jury Prize
at the Cannes Film Festival. Cast & Credits: Bill Murray, Jeffrey Wright, Julie
Delpy, Heather Alicia Simms, Brea Frazier (2005)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/BrokenFlowersH.wmv




Charlie's Angels Movie (Download ONLY)
Ridiculous but campy adaptation of the '70s TV series with Drew Barrymore,
Cameron Diaz and Lucy Liu as crimefighters searching for a kidnapped computer
mogul. Bill Murray. John Forsythe reprises his role from the small screen as the
voice of Charlie. Barrymore is one of the film's producers. Directed by McG.
Cast & Credits: Drew Barrymore, Cameron Diaz, Lucy Liu, Bill Murray, Sam
Rockwell (2000)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/CharliesAngelsVH.wmv




Charlie's Angels TV: Fallen Angel (Download ONLY)
Jill, an 'Orignial Angel' (Farrah Fawcett-Majors) turns up as the girlfriend of
a jewel thief who has managed to elude the Angels. Cheryl Ladd. Damien Roth:
Timothy Dalton (aka: James Bond). Kelly: Jaclyn Smith. Carla: Marilu Tolo.
Tiffany: Shelley Hack. Michael: Michael DeLano. Bosley: David Doyle. Nobbs:
Richard Roat. Mrs. Nibbs: Jenny Neumann. Cast & Credits: Farrah Fawcett-Majors,
Jaclyn Smith, David Doyle, Cheryl Ladd, Shelley Hack
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/CharliesAngelsTVFallenAngel\
H.wmv




Three's Company Marathon
TV Land: Five episodes of the popular sitcom (1977-84) about three fun-loving
roommates who share a strictly platonic relationship in Santa Monica, Cal. Cast
& Credits: John Ritter, Joyce DeWitt, Suzanne Somers, Norman Fell, Audra Lindley
(2006)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/3sCompanyMarathon.wmv




Three's Company Pilot Episode (Download ONLY)
Larry Gelbart wrote this pilot episode explaining how film student David Bell
(John Ritter) moved in with Jenny and Samantha after their other roommate
cleared out following a party. Jenny: Valerie Curtin. Samantha: Suzanne Zenor.
Cast & Credits: John Ritter, Norman Fell, Valerie Curtin, Suzanne Zenor, Audra
Lindley
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/3sCompanyPilotH.wmv




   this Land Is Your Land (Download ONLY)
Judy Collins and the Smothers Brothers host a celebration of folk music.
Performers include the Kingston Trio, the Brothers Four, Roger McGuinn and Barry
McGuire. Also on the bill: Glenn Yarbrough, the Limeliters and Randy Sparks and
the New Minstrels. The event takes place at Carnegie-Mellon University in
Pittsburgh. (2002)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/PBSFolkClassicH.wmv





       Also See Much More In Folder:
   *Featured in AustinLibertyInterNet Radio/TV
Some more recent additions, upgrades or items otherwise of special interest;
before they are re-distributed to other folders in this collection.

   AND in the folder....
    War & Peace
Initiating physical assault upon innocent persons is wrong


       free FROM: AustinLibertyInterNet Radio/TV
at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LibertyProspects/links


   (Due to popular demand, the system is often too busy to respond; so try back
often.  Right click playbacks to 'save target as...' to download selections to
your computer for replay later at your convenience and as often as you want)






                         * 'PeerCasting' continuously now as
'AustinLibertyInterNet'
via 'Yellow Pages' at www.PeerCast.org

Distributed networking like www.PeerCast.org may enable people to
create an alternative to govt licenced & controlled broadcasting.
That can be useful when promoting things that challenge, or may be
inconvenient to, established  authority :)
Please test this (at various times as needed) as an audience member
(or even another 'caster) and let me know of your experience(s).


   ExploreAt http://www.peercast.org/
get a very small self installing program
then select 'yellow pages'
to find 'AustinLibertyInterNet' webcasting
as an experiment by me in 'distributed networking'
then please let me know of your experience















     -Terry Liberty Parker
AND Find More Free On-demand Playbacks On-line via
AustinLibertyInterNet Radio/TV
at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LibertyProspects/links VoiceCall 1.512.462.1776

     every Sunday 7pm (central) to ?
I host informal discussion
to which all are welcome
who want to consider ideas & issues
of Liberty & Justice for ALL

   ON-LINE:

       Look for me (especially Sunday eves) as:

   TxLiberty on Yahoo Messenger




   PicAt http://www.dailykos.com/story/2005/11/9/174518/797











---------------------------------
Looking for earth-friendly autos?
  Browse Top Cars by "Green Rating" at Yahoo! Autos' Green Center.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Graphic version of this and more also at
   http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TerryLiberty/


   Google: "napalm sticks to babies"


   First, I think it should be a stated goal of United States policy to not melt
the skin off of children.



   But, I can hear many Americans ask, "isn't it a natural byproduct of a war of
preemption, er, I mean liberation, to melt the skin off of children?"



   ...there are very good reasons, even in a time of war, not to melt the skin
off of children.

     First, because the insurgency will inevitably be hardened by tales of
American forces melting the skin off of children.



   Second, because the civilian population will harbor considerable resentment
towards Americans for melting the skin off of their children.



   Third, BECAUSE IT FUCKING MELTS THE SKIN OFF OF CHILDREN.

   MoreAt http://www.dailykos.com/story/2005/11/9/174518/797




   Antiwar Radio: Scott Horton
   DailyAt http://antiwar.com/blog/category/antiwar-radio



   LIVE UNSCREENED Call-in TV

   Phone 477.ACTV (1.512.477.2288)
     March 25 Sunday 10pm Central Time


     on Time Warner Austin Cable TV 10
AND...   (Worldwide)
Peer 2 Peer: AustinLibertyInterNet Radio/TV*




       Sunday on 'Jeff Davis Show'
    http://hometown.aol.com/tfijdshow/



   NowAlsoOn www.YouTube.com
   Jeff Davis Show" videos on youtube
   http://youtube.com/profile?user=jeffdavisshow


   with Terry Liberty Parker of  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian




   Crank up yer webcam as we experiment with YOUR face LIVE on TV


     Look for me (especially Sunday eves) as:

   TxLiberty on Yahoo Messenger & MSN Messenger

   Terry Liberty Parker on Skype
   (supports multiple platforms like
   MAC & Linux along with Windows)

   and maybe AustinLiberty on AIM






   WindowsMedia Download Playback of THIS show soon after ending as
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/JD070325.wmv


   On last week's show:

   Marine recruits call cadence: 'Napalm sticks to babies'

   One of them, now ex- US Marine Afghanistan vet, talks

   aprx 3 minute WindowsMedia download/playback
   http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/JD070318a.wmv



     free FROM: AustinLibertyInterNet Radio/TV
at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LibertyProspects/links


   (Due to popular demand, the system is often too busy to respond; so try back
often.  Right click playbacks to 'save target as...' to download selections to
your computer for replay later at your convenience and as often as you want)








   CBS 60 Minutes: 2007.03.18
Scott Pelley interviews SSgt. Frank Wuterich, who is charged with murder in
connection with some of the 24 Iraqi civilians killed in Haditha, Iraq, in
November 2005

   MoreAt http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/03/15/60minutes/main2574973.shtml

   WindowsMedia download/playback at
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/60min070318IraqMurders.wmv




   ABC Nightline: 2007.03.19
On 4yr Iraq war anniversary, a journey into 'darkness'
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/ABCntln070319Iraq5yrStarts.\
wmv




   Daily Show / Colbert Report: 2007.03.20
Atty's away then US Ambassador to UN, Joe Bolton (the 'milk mustache' guy) then
Willie Nelson & more
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/DSClbRpt070320WNelson.wmv




   PBS Charlie Rose 2007.03.21
Global warming then Iraq war perspective by its 'on-site' reporters
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/PBSRose070321.wmv




   NOTE: if any of these LoRez internet playbacks stimulate your interest in
getting a clearer copy, please 'Google' that selection to locate a legal source
if one is not otherwise given already.




   National Geographic: Arlington- Field of Honor
a day at the national cemetery on the Potomac, "where ritual and respect are
woven tightly together," says narrator Frankie R. Faison. The hour interweaves
funerals (including those of a former Vietnam MIA soldier and a soldier who died
in Iraq) and the meticulous preparations for them with a thumbnail history of
Arlington National, the onetime home of George Washington's step-grandson, whose
daughter married Robert E. Lee. President Taft, Joe Louis and Dashiell Hammett
are among the notables buried at Arlington, but the most famous person resting
here is JFK, who visited the cemetery several months before his assassination.
His tour guide recalls the visit: "He said it was so beautiful he could stay
here forever (2004)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/ArlingtonFieldHonor.wmv




   USA Marines (Download ONLY)
Director John Grant's documentary examines the culture of being a marine.
Included: recruit training during boot at Parris Island, S.C.; a tour of the
National Museum of the Marine Corps in Triangle, Va. Also: comments from retired
general Michael Hagee, 33rd commandant of the Marine Corps; and military
reporter Thomas Ricks. (2007)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/theMarinesH.wmv




   Jarhead: Making of (Download ONLY)
A behind-the-scenes look at the making of "Jarhead," a 2005 drama about a
marine's Desert Storm experiences, directed by Sam Mendes ("American Beauty")
and starring Jake Gyllenhaal and Jamie Foxx. (2005)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/JarheadMakingH.wmv




   Jarhead (Download ONLY)
Serviceable soldier story following a third-generation marine (Jake Gyllenhaal)
from boot camp to his job as a sniper during the Gulf War. Jamie Foxx, Peter
Sarsgaard. Directed by Sam Mendes, from a script by William Broyles Jr., who
adapted the military memoir of real-life marine Anthony Swofford (played by
Gyllenhaal). Cast & Credits: Jake Gyllenhaal, Peter Sarsgaard, Lucas Black,
Chris Cooper, Jamie Foxx (2005)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/JarheadVH.wmv




   Also See Much More In Folder:
*Featured in AustinLibertyInterNet Radio/TV
Some more recent additions, upgrades or items otherwise of special interest;
before they are re-distributed to other folders in this collection.
   AND the folder
  War & Peace
Initiating physical assault upon innocent persons is wrong




   MilitaryIndustrialComplex: Why We Fight
In a nationally televised 'farewell' address on January 17, 1961, only four days
before John F. Kennedy's inaugural, two term 1950s US Prez Dwight Eisenhower,
who was also a 4 star General and Supreme Commander of the Allied assault
against Hitler in WWII, warned of the dangers of 'undue influence' exerted by
the 'military-industrial complex' (he would know, afterall)
   MoreAt http://www.worldpolicy.org/journal/hartung01.html
   AddressTextAt http://www.eisenhower.utexas.edu/farewell.htm
   WikipediaAt http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military-industrial_complex
   FlashPlaybackAt
http://www.sonyclassics.com/whywefight/main.html




   NOTE: if any of these LoRez internet playbacks stimulate your interest in
getting a clearer copy, please 'Google' that selection to locate a legal source
if one is not otherwise given already.




   the Last Samurai (Download ONLY)
Tom Cruise in beautifully haunting tale of 19th century Japan's violent clash of
old and new culture. A disillusioned Civil War vet (Tom Cruise) undergoes a
spiritual rebirth after he's taken prisoner by samurai warriors in 1876 Japan. A
gripping story with sumptuous visuals and textured characters. Oscar nominee Ken
Watanabe adds solid support as a samurai leader. The film scored three other
Oscar nominations, including Best Sound. Edward Zwick directed and co-wrote the
script. Cruise, who also co-produced, spent two years preparing for the role.
Cast & Credits: Tom Cruise, Ken Watanabe, Timothy Spall, Billy Connolly, Tony
Goldwyn (2003)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/LastSamuraiH.wmv




   Starship Troopers (Download ONLY)
NOT 'edited for TV' lamaloids! Ultraviolent futuristic thriller about coed
infantry trainees preparing to wipe out mankind's newest enemy: giant bugs from
outer space. Casper Van Dien, Dina Meyer. Carmen: Denise Richards. Ace: Jake
Busey. Zander: Patrick Muldoon. Paul Verhoeven directed. Cast & Credits: Casper
Van Dien, Dina Meyer, Denise Richards, Jake Busey, Neil Patrick Harris (1997)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/StarshipTroopersH.wmv




   Bully (Download ONLY)
Much sex, drugs & nakedness in this unrated version of Larry Clark's
controversial tale of aimless Florida teens who decide to murder one of their
own, a physical and psychological intimidator (Nick Stahl). Based on a true
story. Brad Renfro, Rachel Miner, Bijou Phillips, Michael Pitt, Kelli Garner,
Leo Fitzpatrick, Daniel Franzese, Nathalie Paulding, Elizabeth Dimon, Jessica
Sutta, Edward Amatrudo, Steven Raulerson, Judith Clayton, Alan Lilly. (2001)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/BullyH.wmv




   Hollywood Vietnam (Download ONLY)
A look at the film industry's depiction of the Vietnam War. Included: "Platoon,"
"Full Metal Jacket" and "Apocalypse Now" (available on-line here); comments from
veterans about these films; and public perception of the war. Robert Stone
directed. (2005)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/HollywoodVietnamH.wmv




   Full Metal Jacket (Download ONLY)
Stanley Kubrick's Vietnam saga follows a group of Marines from boot camp to
combat in Vietnam during the 1968 Tet Offensive. Matthew Modine. Pyle: Vincent
D'Onofrio. Hartman: Lee Ermey. Animal Mother: Adam Baldwin. Eightball: Dorian
Harewood. Rafterman: Kevyn Major Howard. Touchdown: Ed O'Ross. (1987)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/Inetpub/wwwroot/Webfiles/FullMetalJacketH.wmv




   Platoon (Download ONLY)
Oliver Stone's Vietnam diary of a green GI (Charlie Sheen) and his good guy/bad
guy sergeants (Willem Dafoe, Tom Berenger). O'Neill: John C. McGinley. Bunny:
Kevin Dillon. Big Harold: Forest Whitaker. Rhah: Francesco Quinn. Cast &
Credits: Charlie Sheen, Willem Dafoe, Tom Berenger, Forest Whitaker, Francesco
Quinn (1986)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/PlatoonVH.wmv




   Casualties of War (Download ONLY)
Brian De Palma directed this story about the rape and murder of a Vietnamese
girl by four U.S. soldiers. Michael J. Fox, Sean Penn. Clark: Don Harvey.
Hatcher: John C. Reilly. Diaz: John Leguizamo. Oahn: Thuy Thu Le. Brown: Erik
King. Rowan: Jack Gwaltney. Reilly: Ving Rhames. Hawthorne: Don Martin.
Screenplay by David Rabe. Cast & Credits: Michael J. Fox, Sean Penn, Don Harvey,
John C. Reilly, John Leguizamo (1989)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/CasualtiesOfWarH.wmv




   Apocalypse Now Redux (Download ONLY)
Forty-nine minutes of added footage fleshes out Francis Ford Coppola's gripping,
surreal 1979 Vietnam epic, starring Martin Sheen as a captain sent to terminate
a renegade colonel (Marlon Brando). Robert Duvall. Harrison Ford has a small
role. Based on Joseph Conrad's "Heart of Darkness." Cast & Credits: Martin
Sheen, Marlon Brando, Robert Duvall, Frederic Forrest, Albert Hall (2001)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/ApocalypseNowReduxVH.wmv




   American Graffiti (Download ONLY)
George Lucas co-wrote and directed this acclaimed music-packed comedy-drama
about teenage life in 1962 California, starring Richard Dreyfuss and Ron Howard.
The impressive ensemble cast also includes Harrison Ford, Cindy Williams and
Mackenzie Phillips. Look for Suzanne Somers as the elusive blonde in the T-Bird.
The film was nominated for five Oscars, including Best Picture. Francis Ford
Coppola produced. Cast & Credits: Richard Dreyfuss, Ron Howard, Paul Le Mat,
Cindy Williams, Harrison Ford (1973)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/AmericanGraffitiH.wmv




   Broken Flowers (Download ONLY)
Screenwriter-director Jim Jarmusch's witty, restrained road movie about a
wealthy, aging Casanova (Bill Murray) who seeks out his former lovers when he
learns he might be a father. A great supporting cast, including Jeffrey Wright,
Sharon Stone and Jessica Lange. Written by Jarmusch, who won a Grand Jury Prize
at the Cannes Film Festival. Cast & Credits: Bill Murray, Jeffrey Wright, Julie
Delpy, Heather Alicia Simms, Brea Frazier (2005)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/BrokenFlowersH.wmv




   Charlie's Angels Movie (Download ONLY)
Ridiculous but campy adaptation of the '70s TV series with Drew Barrymore,
Cameron Diaz and Lucy Liu as crimefighters searching for a kidnapped computer
mogul. Bill Murray. John Forsythe reprises his role from the small screen as the
voice of Charlie. Barrymore is one of the film's producers. Directed by McG.
Cast & Credits: Drew Barrymore, Cameron Diaz, Lucy Liu, Bill Murray, Sam
Rockwell (2000)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/CharliesAngelsVH.wmv




   Charlie's Angels TV: Fallen Angel (Download ONLY)
Jill, an 'Orignial Angel' (Farrah Fawcett-Majors) turns up as the girlfriend of
a jewel thief who has managed to elude the Angels. Cheryl Ladd. Damien Roth:
Timothy Dalton (aka: James Bond). Kelly: Jaclyn Smith. Carla: Marilu Tolo.
Tiffany: Shelley Hack. Michael: Michael DeLano. Bosley: David Doyle. Nobbs:
Richard Roat. Mrs. Nibbs: Jenny Neumann. Cast & Credits: Farrah Fawcett-Majors,
Jaclyn Smith, David Doyle, Cheryl Ladd, Shelley Hack
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/CharliesAngelsTVFallenAngel\
H.wmv




   Three's Company Marathon
TV Land: Five episodes of the popular sitcom (1977-84) about three fun-loving
roommates who share a strictly platonic relationship in Santa Monica, Cal. Cast
& Credits: John Ritter, Joyce DeWitt, Suzanne Somers, Norman Fell, Audra Lindley
(2006)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/3sCompanyMarathon.wmv




   Three's Company Pilot Episode (Download ONLY)
Larry Gelbart wrote this pilot episode explaining how film student David Bell
(John Ritter) moved in with Jenny and Samantha after their other roommate
cleared out following a party. Jenny: Valerie Curtin. Samantha: Suzanne Zenor.
Cast & Credits: John Ritter, Norman Fell, Valerie Curtin, Suzanne Zenor, Audra
Lindley
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/3sCompanyPilotH.wmv





       Also See Much More In Folder:
   *Featured in AustinLibertyInterNet Radio/TV
Some more recent additions, upgrades or items otherwise of special interest;
before they are re-distributed to other folders in this collection.

   AND in the folder....
    War & Peace
Initiating physical assault upon innocent persons is wrong


       free FROM: AustinLibertyInterNet Radio/TV
at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LibertyProspects/links


   (Due to popular demand, the system is often too busy to respond; so try back
often.  Right click playbacks to 'save target as...' to download selections to
your computer for replay later at your convenience and as often as you want)






                         * 'PeerCasting' continuously now as
'AustinLibertyInterNet'
via 'Yellow Pages' at www.PeerCast.org

Distributed networking like www.PeerCast.org may enable people to
create an alternative to govt licenced & controlled broadcasting.
That can be useful when promoting things that challenge, or may be
inconvenient to, established  authority :)
Please test this (at various times as needed) as an audience member
(or even another 'caster) and let me know of your experience(s).


   ExploreAt http://www.peercast.org/
get a very small self installing program
then select 'yellow pages'
to find 'AustinLibertyInterNet' webcasting
as an experiment by me in 'distributed networking'
then please let me know of your experience















     -Terry Liberty Parker
AND Find More Free On-demand Playbacks On-line via
AustinLibertyInterNet Radio/TV
at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LibertyProspects/links VoiceCall 1.512.462.1776

     every Sunday 7pm (central) to ?
I host informal discussion
to which all are welcome
who want to consider ideas & issues
of Liberty & Justice for ALL

   ON-LINE:

       Look for me (especially Sunday eves) as:

   TxLiberty on Yahoo Messenger




   PicAt http://www.wilsonsalmanac.com/images/byron_naked.jpg













---------------------------------
Don't pick lemons.
See all the new 2007 cars at Yahoo! Autos.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Rick Stanley
Constitutional Activist
E-mail: rick@...


We the People Scoop 3/21/07

========================================================================
WE THE PEOPLE SCOOP - TO EXPOSE!
**  Visit the website: http://www.stanley2002.org
**  OR Our NEW Offshore Site at http://www.wtpconstitutionalactivism.org
**  Like the Scoop? Forward it to everyone you know!
========================================================================


OPINION RELEASE:   Letter Imperfect Is the FBI abusing a(nother) PATRIOT
provision?  Kerry Howley |


----- Original Message -----
From: <Libertarian20037@...>
To: <TheRevolutionaryCoalition@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2007 3:50 AM
Subject:   [TheRevolutionaryCoalition] Letter Imperfect Is the FBI abusing
a(nother) PATRIOT provision? Kerry Howley |


  Letter Imperfect
> Is the FBI abusing a(nother) PATRIOT provision?
> _Kerry  Howley_ (http://www.reason.com/staff/show/135.html)  | March 19, 2007
>
> This month, a government report _revealed_
> (http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/19/washington/19letter.html?ref=us)   that the
> FBI's extrajudicial demands for
> information were being overused and  under-recorded. And in a half-defense
> that
> should warm any libertarian's heart,  bureaucrats responded by falling over
> one another to affirm, in loud defiance,  the prodigious scope of government
> incompetence.
> The FBI was already hip to "deficiencies" in the system before the  report
> hit the presses, FBI Director Robert Mueller insists in an addendum to  the
> _report_ (http://www.usdoj.gov/oig/special/s0703b/final.pdf)   (pdf), while
> thanking the Inspector General for finding a pile more. Embattled  Attorney
> General
> Alberto Gonzales _claims_
> (http://www.usdoj.gov/ag/speeches/2007/ag_speech_070309.html)   that
> "questionable judgment" and "lack of attention" are to blame,
> "not  intentional wrongdoing." The agency's defenders now the claim that it's
> not  brutish, just bungling; mistakes were made, but hearts are pure.
> There is little reason to oppose this version of events, and the history of
> the humble National Security Letter is a perfect example of government
> barreling  dumbly toward power. The letters' provenance can be traced to a
> financial
> privacy law in 1978. Congress didn't want the law to stand in the way of FBI
> investigations of foreign agents, so it carved out an exception for very
> narrow  cases. In 1986, in an attempt to make it easier for the FBI to obtain
> the
> same  information, Congress amended the law and created the National Security
> Letter.  The same year, Congress gave the FBI the power to request the phone
> records of  foreign agents.
> In 2001, Section 505 of the PATRIOT Act swept away the "foreigner" bit;
> subjects just had to be suspected of involvement in foreign terrorism.
> Suddenly,
> any FBI field supervisor could send them out, and the men and women who
> received  them were required to keep silent. Next to go, in 2004, was the
> "financial
> institution" caveat. Congress made the meaning of the term elastic, allowing
> the  FBI to subpoena records from a broad swath of businesses.
> In 20 years, then, the National Security Letter went from a way to dig up
> foreigners' financial information to a way to drum up locals' library lists.
> The
> Inspector General's report was an attempt to find out what happens when you
> give  an investigative agency broad power to demand information without a
> search  warrant.
> What happens, evidently, is government uses that power. Issuance of the
> letters has spiked "dramatically" since PATRIOT went into play, and the
> majority
> of letters now target "U.S. persons"-not foreigners. According to its own
> database, the FBI sent out at least 8,500 letters in 2000. By 2003, the number
> was 39,000. By 2004, 56,000. And all of those numbers, the report notes dryly,
> "understate the total number of national security letter requests."
> The agency seems rather less enthused about data keeping than it does letter
> sending, and its own database is a black hole. The Inspector General's Office
> reviewed 77 files and 293 letters, then compared them with the FBI database.
> It  found 22 percent more demands than were ever recorded. Of the entries
> that were  recorded, 12 percent stated that the target was a foreigner when he
> or
> she was  in fact American.
> The FBI is also supposed to report letters suspected of being improperly or
> illegal issued. Between 2003 and 2005, it reported 26 such instances. In the
> 77  files the Inspector General reviewed, a small slice of the whole, auditors
> found  22. Given the sample size, this suggests thousands-not dozens-of
> extralegal  demands for information.
> Many thousands of letters will go un-reviewed, and the report stands as a
> litany of unknowns. It thus adds remarkably little to a debate already focused
> on the merits and drawbacks of government secrecy. The agency, and President
> Bush, claim that the letters are indispensable to diffusing terrorism-an
> assertion agency defenders will have to take on faith, and civil libertarians
> will continue to challenge. The agency, and the report noting its failures,
> claim the inaccuracies are the result of human error, not intentional
> wrongdoing,
> which the agency's defenders will also take on faith, and the  American Civil
> Liberties Union _deems  spurious._
> (http://www.aclu.org/safefree/nationalsecurityletters/28968prs20070309.html)
> The ACLU puts forward several arguments for why we shouldn't swallow this
> latest incompetence dodge. What it doesn't do is explain why anyone worried
> about the letters should focus primarily on intentions; why a profusion of
> typos
> has been allowed to become a defense of warrantless searches rather than an
> indictment of them. Whether the mistakes were malicious or simply mindless,
> the  profusion of administrative error suggests that PATRIOT was
> irresponsible.
> As the report limns the banality of error, it's impossible not to think of
> poor Mr. Buttle, the unfortunate family man of Terry Gilliam's Brazil,  killed
> off, thanks to a typo, in place of accused terrorist Tuttle. That a  keystroke
> can lead to abuse doesn't say much for the newly decentralized power  to fish
> for information. Whether individuals were targeted maliciously or not,  the
> FBI has clearly primed the ground for abuse.
> Bureaucrats will continue to insist that National Security Letters are
> crucial to fighting terror, and that the power to issue directives simply
> demands
> better bookkeeping, not a rollback of actual power. But as the FBI  promises
> to fix itself, even its promises of reform start to sound more and more  like
> a
> government directive we've all heard too much of recently: Just Trust  Us.
>
> Kerry Howley is an associate editor of  Reason.
> Send this article to:
>    *   _Del.icio.us_
>
(http://del.icio.us/post?url=http://www.reason.com/news/show/119180.html&title=L\
etter+Imperfect)
>    *   _Digg_
>
(http://digg.com/submit?phase=2&url=http://www.reason.com/news/show/119180.html&\
title=Letter+Imperfect)
>    *   _Liberty Loop_
>
(http://www.libertyloop.com/add_story.php?story_url=http://www.reason.com/news/s\
how/119180.html)
>    *   _Reddit_
>
(http://reddit.com/submit?url=http://www.reason.com/news/show/119180.html&title=\
Letter+Imperfect)
>
> Try Reason's award-winning print edition _today_
> (https://www.kable.com/pub/anxx/newsubs.asp?src=V6ATXT) ! Your first issue is
> FREE if you are not
> completely  satisfied.
>    *   _Printer Friendly_ (http://www.reason.com/news/printer/119180.html)
>    *   _Send to a  Friend_
> (http://www.reason.com/news/sendtofriend/119180.html)

======================================================================
Disclaimer: Information shared in the Stanley Scoop is not necessarily
the opinion of the editor or staff.  It is shared for information
purposes only and it is recommended that you come to your own conclusions.
======================================================================
Live Free or Die! Liberty in our Lifetime!
We the People Scoop
http://www.stanley2002.org
http://www.wtpconstitutionalactivism.org
Reply to: rick@...

Also check out The Revolutionary Coalition!
This group is working to unite all third parties that defend the
constitution, independents, and non-voters (making up 60% of
Americans) into one SUPER THIRD PARTY!

On Yahoo groups at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TheRevolutionaryCoalition

This group has a single line platform: "To defend our (Natural)
God-given, unalienable, Constitutionally protected and guaranteed
rights."

Subscribe by sending email to:
therevolutionarycoalition-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

To subscribe to the We the People Constitutional Activism Scoop,
send a message to subscribe@...

If you wish to unsubscribe from We the People Constitutional Activism Scoop,
send a message to unsubscribe@...

All other changes for personal attention, such as changing your email address,
send to
webmaster@...

Be aware that you may be receiving mail forwarded from a group,
in which case you may have to visit http://groups.yahoo.com to unsubscribe.
Please also note that mail sent to our "reply to:" address,
newsletter@... is usually ignored....




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Rick Stanley
Constitutional Activist
E-mail: rick@...


We the People Scoop 3/21/07

========================================================================
WE THE PEOPLE SCOOP - TO EXPOSE!
**  Visit the website: http://www.stanley2002.org
**  OR Our NEW Offshore Site at http://www.wtpconstitutionalactivism.org
**  Like the Scoop? Forward it to everyone you know!
========================================================================


OPINION RELEASE:   Latest Chuck Conces Update


----- Original Message -----
From: "Angela Stark" <angelastark@...>
Subject:     Latest Chuck Conces Update


  ----- Original Message -----
From: william price
To: angelastark@...
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 9:05 PM
Subject: Organized Crime


Angela,

We are going to be refiling the writ of habeas Corpus. Please pass this along.
Thanks


                 March, 21 2007
                                     Organized Crime

While I was reading my first letter from Chuck Conces from the Newago County
Jail, the telephone rang. It was Hannah Dahl, daughter of Dr. Phil Dahl. Hannah
is 20 years old and a friend of the family's. She grew up with my daughters.
Hannah asked if she could give my information to her father who is serving time
in a Virginia penitentiary for non-payment of income taxes. I gave Hannah my
information, and told her I would be looking forward to a letter from her
father. I guess I'll be getting lots of inmate mail.

Phil Dahl was a Stockbridge, Mi. dentist. He has 13 children and never turned
anyone away because they didn't have dental insurance or couldn't afford to pay
for his service. If you couldn't pay Phil, he would barter the fee or wave it
altogether. Phil is a salt of the earth kind of guy. You can't help but like
him. Several years ago Dr. Phil told me about his decision to not pay the income
tax. It was because of this government's practice to subsidize abortion clinics.
Phil was adamant; he would not allow his money to be used for that purpose.

One day Phil's dental practice was paid a visit. Gun-toting IRS agents stormed
through his door and pointed weapons at Phil's staff and patients. There were
children in Phil's office drawing on a large chalk board he keeps there to
entertain them. Agents all decked out in body armor with semi automatic weapons
had everyone frozen with fear by intimidating body language and loud threats of
what would happen if anyone dared to deviate from their shouted orders.

I wasn't there at the time, but I asked Phil later if any of his gun toting
visitors had bothered to bring a warrant along. Phil made me a copy of what had
been left after they confiscated his computers and file cabinets. It was a
summons signed by Magistrate Judge Ellen Carmody. I looked it over and
discovered that no affiant had signed this summons. No one vouched for the
information this document alleged. Judge Carmody authorized a summons and a raid
without probable cause. Is that a crime? Yes!

Chuck Conces's appeal will be reviewed by the 6th Circuit Court. The newest
member to that court is a felon, Judge David W. McKeague. McKeague was presented
irrefutable evidence of a false police report involving a case I had before him.
McKeague chose to protect the Ingham County Sheriff and Prosecutor from my
complaint of a false arrest, and malicious prosecution. I presented McKeague an
Affidavit from a woman that was cited by an Ingham County Deputy as stating
certain facts. The woman "quoted" by the Deputy stated to me that the Deputy's
report was a lie and signed an Affidavit to that effect. This woman was irate
that she was used to endorse a lie on an official police report. McKeague
ignored this, and the fact that the arrest leading to the malicious prosecution
was made without a warrant ever being issued in the first place. McKeague is a
felon posing as a Circuit Court judge. I sent dozens of faxes to judiciary
committee members soon after Mckeague's nomination by George Bush along with
copies of the false police report and Affidavit by the woman repudiating it. No
response. The judiciary committee members confirmed Bush's nomination despite
the proof I had faxed.

Back in the 20's and 30's our government was pursuing organized criminals
(Mafia). Well it appears that these organized criminals have found a new
Godfather, Uncle Sam. I could name at least a dozen of them that have traded
their violin cases for a gavel. But don't take my word for it read former Judge
Anthony Napolitano's book "Constitutional Chaos". The picture I have just
painted will seem mild next to Napolitano's. Boy, would I ever love to see
Napolitano at a Freedom Law School or a We the People conference. (Hint, hint
Peymon and Mr. Schultz.)

  There is a silver lining to this very dark cloud. The light being cast from the
truth has caused an awakening in America. Ed and Elaine Brown can testify to
what has happened since the news of their case has been reported. THE QUEST FOR
A FAIR TRIAL IN CONCORD blog has brought much needed attention to the deeds of
darkness (Thank you Fred Smart) and is a national bulletin board for warning
America: Unless we join in on spreading the truth we will all become prisoners.


                       Freedom to Fascism, an Orwellian Odyssey

                           George Orwell would have been pleased to see this day
in America. Orwell's novels "Animal Farm" and "1984" predicted a state of
totalitarianism in the world. Regrettably, Orwell did not live to see the
phenomena you are about to witness. The movie "America: Freedom to Fascism" is
an expose' on the Federal Income Tax, the Federal Reserve Banking/system and
finally the facts about an international cartel that has been very busy
"arranging" your entire future. It is more powerful than anything you have seen.
Ironically, these world planners featured in Aaron Russo's movie, have something
in common with George Orwell, their most notable critic. The cartel's global
plan for the middle class, and the title of Mr. Orwell's most famous book, could
very well share the same name, "Animal Farm"

"Animal Farm" released in 1945 was an ominous warning to the world. There was
another ominous release that year, the atomic bombs over Nagasaki and Hiroshima.
"Freedom to Fascism" was released in 2006 and with it, something even more
powerful than the atomic bomb, the truth.

Spread the word, by using the most powerful weapon known to man, the truth.
Watch and share "America: Freedom to Fascism".

For more information on the federal income tax go to www.article-taxation.com

Bill Price



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Angela,

Please pass this along. Thanks

Bill


                        March 19, 2007

                                               The Devil is in the Details

Chuck Conces received some mail from the U.S. District Court last Friday.
Chuck's wife showed me a copy of the Court's Orders that were delivered to her
residence on Pine Hill Dr. They have denied The Habeas Corpus on two grounds.
The first reason deals mostly with technicalities: ".there are no allegations in
the petition to establish that Terry Acton (name on the writ) is entitled to
"next of friend" status on behalf of the Defendant. The United States Supreme
Court held that "next of friend" standing for purposes of habeas corpus has two
prerequisites: (1) the person seeking such standing must show why the real party
in interest cannot prosecute the action in his own behalf: and (2) the next of
friend must be truly dedicated to the interests of the real party, as
demonstrated by some significant relationship with the real party in interest."

"The second problem with the instant action is that the Defendant has appealed
the contempt order to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
The usual rule is that a habeas corpus action will not be entertained during the
dependency of a direct appeal, in as much as a direct appeal may render the
habeas action moot."

I would cite more but we all know that this stuff is meant to hypnotize weak
minds.  If Chuck has done what the DOJ says he has done, then give the man an
opportunity to present his case to a jury. Conces claims his innocence, why not
let a jury decide. What is the DOJ and the Hon. Quist afraid of?

We know that details have relevance when they are applicable. When a robbery or
a car accident is described, it naturally is limited to the particular events of
that robbery or that car accident, and cannot be applied to any others. This is
where the devil is. The DOJ is using details that sound plausible, but do not
apply. The DOJ uses phrases like "tax scam". Everyone knows scams are bad, but
where is the evidence that Conces was actually involved in one?  Like in
robbery, an injured party complains to the authorities and gives a first hand
account of his property loss and a description of the perpetrator linking the
details to the actual crime. Conces's only accuser, Michael Raum, had no first
hand knowledge and no witnesses that could testify to his allegations, nothing
to link the crime to the details. Additionally, Quist has determined that the
damage from Chuck's "activities" amount to less than $20, so he is conveniently
not entitled to a jury trial under the 7th Amendment to the Constitution. Its
things like this that gives new meaning to old phrases like "truth is stranger
than fiction".

We know, that before a court can issue an order concerning a matter, it must
have jurisdiction to do so. Could Judge Quist issue an order for you to appear
at the U.S. Marshall's office to answer questions before DOJ attorneys? No! Why
not? Because a valid complaint with evidence of a broken law has not been filed
against you! The U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan issued
an order it claims the Defendant, Conces, is in violation of.





Yet the court cannot show according to the Plaintiff's allegations (Michael
Raum, DOJ) that there was statutory authorization to file a complaint against
the Defendant, Conces, in the first place.

  This is our mantra: "There was no violation, because there was no civil
lawsuit. There was no lawsuit because there was no Authorization."

IRC Sec.7401; AUTHORIZATION: "No civil action for the collection or recovery of
taxes, or of any fine, penalty or forfeiture, shall be commenced unless the
secretary (of the Treasury) authorizes the proceedings and the Attorney General
or his delegate directs that the action be commenced."

What part of NO does the DOJ and Judge Quist not understand????

The civil suit filed by the DOJ against Chuck was first brought by Michael Raum,
U.S. Attorney. In another order received by Mary Conces last Friday, get this.

ORDER GRANTING WITHDRAWAL OF APPEARANCE OF MICHAEL RAUM :
  "Based upon the United States' representation in its motion that Michael Raum
has retired from the Department of Justice (sic).

It is hearby ordered that Michael Raum's appearance on behalf of the United
States for this matter be terminated. Accordingly, the Clerk will remove his
name from the Court's docket and send no further correspondence to him."

  Mr. Raum thoroughly screwed this case up folks. They probably don't ever want
to see him again. Raum was likely told to retire, but not before he left his
dirty laundry behind. No matter how hard the Hon. Quist and his friends try,
they can't seem to clean it up.

  Judge Quist and certain attorneys for the Department of Justice have a much
bigger problem than the debacle they are managing in "United States v Charles
Conces". These renegades never realized the staying power of the patriot
community. I was reminded of certain groups that I failed to mention in an
earlier message I wrote entitled "The Court of Public Opinion". The groups I
neglected to mention Sav-A-Patriot Fellowship, Free enterprise Society, Patriot
Network and Freedom Law School, are some of the oldest and most successful on
the patriot landscape. To not mention these groups would be like not mentioning
the 1st and 3rd Marine divisions during roll call for service rendered in our
country's defense. Take note of these defenders of liberty and their dedication
to this republic and its sacred Constitution. They were in the fight before I
realized that there was one, and thanks to them and all who have come to their
country's aid, we will win. We are gaining. The adversaries of liberty hear
footsteps and are looking over their shoulders. They are beginning to hear the
breath of those in pursuit and the sounds coming from their throats are a
warning, that the times "they are a changing".







"Come writers and critics who prophesize with your pen - keep your eyes open
wide this chance won't come again - and don't speak too soon for the wheel is
still in spin, and there's no telling who it will be naming .. for the times
they are a changing." Bob Dylan 1964.

  Lately some writers and critics have tried to forewarn the middle class of the
coming crisis. Pat Buchanan's effort to sound the alarm against NAFTA, GATT and
the WTO, is a recent example. The media conglomerates have shown time and again
just how easily they can manage such forays into the public consciousness.  The
wheel of fate alluded to in Dylan's song has come to rest. Names have been
named, places revealed, dates are now known and the future now occupies its
place in history.

George Orwell would have been pleased to see this day in America. Orwell's
novels "Animal Farm" and "1984" predicted a state of totalitarianism in the
world. Regrettably, Orwell did not live to see the phenomena you are about to
witness. The movie "America: Freedom to Fascism" is an expose' on the Federal
Income Tax, the Federal Reserve Banking/system and finally the facts about an
international cartel that has been very busy "arranging" your entire future. It
is more powerful than anything you have seen. Ironically, these world planners
featured in Aaron Russo's movie, have something in common with George Orwell,
their most notable critic. The cartel's global plan for the middle class, and
the title of Mr. Orwell's most famous book, could very well share the same name,
"Animal Farm."

"Animal Farm" released in 1945 was an ominous warning to the world. There was
another ominous release that year, the atomic bombs over Nagasaki and Hiroshima.
"Freedom to Fascism" was released in 2006 and with it, something even more
powerful than the atomic bomb, the truth.

"Gather round people wherever you roam, and admit that the waters around you
have grown - so you better start swimming or you'll sink like a stone, if to you
your time is worth saving, for the times they are a changing."

Is our time worth saving?  Spread the word, by using the most powerful weapon
known to man, the truth. Watch and share "America, Freedom to Fascism".

  "Keep your eyes open wide this chance won't come again.for the times they are a
changing..."

For additional information on the federal income tax, visit
www.article1-taxation.com

Bill Price

======================================================================
Disclaimer: Information shared in the Stanley Scoop is not necessarily
the opinion of the editor or staff.  It is shared for information
purposes only and it is recommended that you come to your own conclusions.
======================================================================
Live Free or Die! Liberty in our Lifetime!
We the People Scoop
http://www.stanley2002.org
http://www.wtpconstitutionalactivism.org
Reply to: rick@...

Also check out The Revolutionary Coalition!
This group is working to unite all third parties that defend the
constitution, independents, and non-voters (making up 60% of
Americans) into one SUPER THIRD PARTY!

On Yahoo groups at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TheRevolutionaryCoalition

This group has a single line platform: "To defend our (Natural)
God-given, unalienable, Constitutionally protected and guaranteed
rights."

Subscribe by sending email to:
therevolutionarycoalition-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

To subscribe to the We the People Constitutional Activism Scoop,
send a message to subscribe@...

If you wish to unsubscribe from We the People Constitutional Activism Scoop,
send a message to unsubscribe@...

All other changes for personal attention, such as changing your email address,
send to
webmaster@...

Be aware that you may be receiving mail forwarded from a group,
in which case you may have to visit http://groups.yahoo.com to unsubscribe.
Please also note that mail sent to our "reply to:" address,
newsletter@... is usually ignored....




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Rick Stanley
Constitutional Activist
E-mail: rick@...


We the People Scoop 3/21/07

========================================================================
WE THE PEOPLE SCOOP - TO EXPOSE!
**  Visit the website: http://www.stanley2002.org
**  OR Our NEW Offshore Site at http://www.wtpconstitutionalactivism.org
**  Like the Scoop? Forward it to everyone you know!
========================================================================


OPINION RELEASE:   A JUDICIAL SYSTEM ROTTEN TO THE CORE


----- Original Message -----
From: "Alexis Endurance" <one2vegas@...>
Subject: A JUDICIAL SYSTEM ROTTEN TO THE CORE


>A JUDICIAL SYSTEM ROTTEN TO THE CORE  March 8, 2007  A JUDICIAL SYSTEM ROTTEN
>TO THE CORE         Police reporting false confessions, interrogating
>juvenilles without their parents consent or even their knowledge. Overzealous
>and underzealous prosecutors and judges. Hiding, losing, and witholding
>evidence, especially evidence that would exhonnerate the accused. A Corrupt
>Sheriff's department. A thriving prison industry with private contracts.
>Polygraphers and psychologists contracting with the state that must follow
>whatever treatment the state wants, not neccesarily what's best for the
>offender and/or the community. Legislators doing the bidding of the
>corporations and lobbyists instead of representing "We the People", even when
>"We the people stand up and speak out. Any legislator who dares go against the
>"System" and threaten these lucrative businesses is certain to be dealt a
>lethal blow. All this is topped off with a Supreme Court that has absolutely no
>balls or no
> will to stop it. Democracy is dead, if it ever really was alive.
>  This is the growing rotten stench. I see it here in Arizona firsthand, and it
> is spreading. Our entire country has become infected. Fueled by power and
> greed. It is thrust upon an unwitting public who are fed a steady diet of fear
> and lies by a media that is owned by the very corporations which stand to gain
> the most from selling us all down river. The media is guarding the flock only
> the media is a member of the pack of wolves which cares only for it's own
> insatiable hunger.
>  Spread a little fear and propaganda and tell us that we must give up certain
> rights and freedoms, you know, just the little one's like the right to be free
> from illegal and frivolous searches and seizures, the right to privacy, and
> those other pesky constitutional thingies which politicians like to call
> "Loopholes".  Of course, these loopholes are our rights, God given and
> constitutionally mandated. When we destroy the rights of accused criminals,
> and other percieved enemies, we unwittingly destroy those rights and
> protections for ourselves as well. Pray you'll never be needing them. Pray
> you'll never be accused. Above all, pray it is never your child that gets
> accused. Make no mistake, in the words of Gerry Spence "We are all on the same
> conveyor belt headed for the same slaughterhouse, and at last when you reach
> the man with the hammer (the judge) you will then discover there is no way off
> the belt.
>  Here's how it's being done, slowly and calculated, right under our noses:
>  Propaganda is a mighty weapon in war. In the case of Registered Sex Offenders
> or Terrorists (for example) it's aim is to dehumanize the "enemy" and to
> create a hatred against a special group. The technique is to create a false
> image in the mind. This is done by using special words, special avoidance of
> words, and by saying that "they" as a group (not individuals) are responsible
> for things they never did. The aim is to create hate and fear so that the
> ultimate goals of Corporate America continue to be met.
>  Collective Punishment example 1:  What happened after 911 is a very
> interesting example. A man, Osama Bin Laden, from Saudi Arabia, orders 19  of
> his pals to hijack airplanes and fly them into buildings in the U.S. Suddenly
> we are told there is an "axis of evil". Bands of lawless neanderthals who
> simply want to kill all Americans. Because??????  The next thing we know we're
> hanging Sadam Hussein and fighting an all out simultaneous war in Iraq and
> Afghanistan. Because??????? Well, the propaganda worked. We hate "them" and
> nothing, not even the conditions at Guantanamo Bay and Abu Grahb are rotten
> enough for the likes of "them".  Just to ensure our complacency, we hung
> Saddam Hussein because the bastard had it coming anyway.
>  Collective Punishment - example 2:  John Couey a registered sex offender
> allegedly rapes and murders a 9 year old girl. An un-named and unknown
> "mystery man" brutally murders and decapitates a little boy named Adam Walsh.
> To this day no one has been charged with the crime. Two individuals, two
> brutal crimes. The response? Jessica's Law and the Adam Walsh Act. These laws
> are the ultimate form of Collective Punishment. Which is exactly what these
> laws all do. Collective punishment is when you hold an entire group of
> individuals responsible for the act of another. This is specifically forbidden
> by the Geneva Convention Rules against Torture. No matter though. Why?
> Because, again the propaganda has been successfully administered to the
> public. "They" are all dangerous. "They" can't be cured. "They" have the
> highest recidivism rates of all criminals. ALL of these are lies.
>  Not only have they lied to the public and instilled such deep fear, they have
> duped the American public out of anything that does anything to protect
> children or prevent such horrific crimes from happening. These laws are
> creating an abundance of wealth for corporate America and the thriving prison
> industry. No matter that the crimes of 99.9999% of the people on the registry
> had absolutely nothing to do with the death of Adam Walsh or Jessica Lunsford.
> No matter that their crimes didn't even remotely resemble those for which the
> laws are named. No matter. Nothing is too rotten and horrible for those damned
> Sex Offenders. They are lucky we even let them breathe the same air as us.
> This group has been so effectively propaganized that I often hear politicians
> openly say that "they" have NO rights. With the residency restrictions,
> registration requirements, and litany of laws applied retroactively and
> collectively, it's hard to argue. The only question is: Who's next?
>
>
>
>  Tags: collective punishment, corruption, judicial system, residency
> restrictions, sex offenders
>
     Love & Blessing's, Alexis

======================================================================
Disclaimer: Information shared in the Stanley Scoop is not necessarily
the opinion of the editor or staff.  It is shared for information
purposes only and it is recommended that you come to your own conclusions.
======================================================================
Live Free or Die! Liberty in our Lifetime!
We the People Scoop
http://www.stanley2002.org
http://www.wtpconstitutionalactivism.org
Reply to: rick@...

Also check out The Revolutionary Coalition!
This group is working to unite all third parties that defend the
constitution, independents, and non-voters (making up 60% of
Americans) into one SUPER THIRD PARTY!

On Yahoo groups at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TheRevolutionaryCoalition

This group has a single line platform: "To defend our (Natural)
God-given, unalienable, Constitutionally protected and guaranteed
rights."

Subscribe by sending email to:
therevolutionarycoalition-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

To subscribe to the We the People Constitutional Activism Scoop,
send a message to subscribe@...

If you wish to unsubscribe from We the People Constitutional Activism Scoop,
send a message to unsubscribe@...

All other changes for personal attention, such as changing your email address,
send to
webmaster@...

Be aware that you may be receiving mail forwarded from a group,
in which case you may have to visit http://groups.yahoo.com to unsubscribe.
Please also note that mail sent to our "reply to:" address,
newsletter@... is usually ignored....




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Rick Stanley
Constitutional Activist
E-mail: rick@...


We the People Scoop 3/18/07

========================================================================
WE THE PEOPLE SCOOP - TO EXPOSE!
**  Visit the website: http://www.stanley2002.org
**  OR Our NEW Offshore Site at http://www.wtpconstitutionalactivism.org
**  Like the Scoop? Forward it to everyone you know!
========================================================================


OPINION RELEASE:   Another Day In The Police State of Amerika


----- Original Message -----
From: "Joseph Rodrigues" <mak91@...>
Subject:   Another Day In The Police State of Amerika


Boy, 7, arrested for riding dirt bike on sidewalk
Baltimore mayor apologizes; mother says son was just sitting there
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17647997/?GT1=9145

STANLEY NOTE:  Each day the incidents increase in their system that they have
erected outside the boundries of the constitution.  America has been overthrown
from within.

======================================================================
Disclaimer: Information shared in the Stanley Scoop is not necessarily
the opinion of the editor or staff.  It is shared for information
purposes only and it is recommended that you come to your own conclusions.
======================================================================
Live Free or Die! Liberty in our Lifetime!
We the People Scoop
http://www.stanley2002.org
http://www.wtpconstitutionalactivism.org
Reply to: rick@...

Also check out The Revolutionary Coalition!
This group is working to unite all third parties that defend the
constitution, independents, and non-voters (making up 60% of
Americans) into one SUPER THIRD PARTY!

On Yahoo groups at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TheRevolutionaryCoalition

This group has a single line platform: "To defend our (Natural)
God-given, unalienable, Constitutionally protected and guaranteed
rights."

Subscribe by sending email to:
therevolutionarycoalition-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

To subscribe to the We the People Constitutional Activism Scoop,
send a message to subscribe@...

If you wish to unsubscribe from We the People Constitutional Activism Scoop,
send a message to unsubscribe@...

All other changes for personal attention, such as changing your email address,
send to
webmaster@...

Be aware that you may be receiving mail forwarded from a group,
in which case you may have to visit http://groups.yahoo.com to unsubscribe.
Please also note that mail sent to our "reply to:" address,
newsletter@... is usually ignored....




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Scroll all the way thru for UPDATES!

   Graphic version of this and more also at
     http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TerryLiberty/


   NEWS Google: Protest War



   Thousands of demonstrators marched to the Pentagon on Saturday to mark both
the fourth anniversary of the American invasion of Iraq and the 40th anniversary
of the march along the same route to protest the Vietnam War
   Pic&MoreTextAt http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/18/us/18protest.html






   NEWS Google: CBS 60 Minutes Iraq

     Marine Defends Haditha Decisions  In Exclusive Interview, Sgt. Frank
Wuterich Tells 60 Minutes He's Sorry It Happened But He Would Do It Again
     60 Minutes correspondent "
src="http://wwwimage.cbsnews.com/images/2007/03/15/image2575045g.jpg" width=244
vspace=3>Quote

   "What I did that day, the decision that I made, I would make those decisions
again today. Those are decisions that I made in a combat situation, and I
believe I had to make those decisions."


   (CBS) He's sorry that civilians, including women and children, died when he
and his men reacted to an attack that killed a comrade in Haditha, but Staff
Sgt. Frank Wuterich says today he would make the same decision that caused their
deaths.

   StoryPics&VideoAt
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/03/15/60minutes/main2574973.shtml



   Antiwar Radio: Scott Horton
   DailyAt http://antiwar.com/blog/category/antiwar-radio



   LIVE UNSCREENED Call-in TV

   Phone 477.ACTV (1.512.477.2288)
     March 18 Sunday 10pm Central Time


     on Time Warner Austin Cable TV 10
AND...   (Worldwide)
Peer 2 Peer: AustinLibertyInterNet Radio/TV*




       Sunday on 'Jeff Davis Show'
    http://hometown.aol.com/tfijdshow/



   NowAlsoOn www.YouTube.com
   Jeff Davis Show" videos on youtube
   http://youtube.com/profile?user=jeffdavisshow


   with Terry Liberty Parker of  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian




   Crank up yer webcam as we experiment with YOUR face LIVE on TV


     Look for me (especially Sunday eves) as:

   TxLiberty on Yahoo Messenger & MSN Messenger

   Terry Liberty Parker on Skype
   (supports multiple platforms like
   MAC & Linux along with Windows)

   and maybe AustinLiberty on AIM






   WindowsMedia Download Playback of THIS show soon after ending as
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/JD070318.wmv


   On last week's show:

   Young 'macho' recruits exploited & thrown in 'the shit'

   One of them, now ex- US Marine Afghanistan vet, talks

   15 minute WindowsMedia download/playback
   http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/JD070311a.wmv



     free FROM: AustinLibertyInterNet Radio/TV
at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LibertyProspects/links


   (Due to popular demand, the system is often too busy to respond; so try back
often.  Right click playbacks to 'save target as...' to download selections to
your computer for replay later at your convenience and as often as you want)









   ABC Nightline: 2007.03.16 US Sex & Chavez
'HookingUp: FussBudgets freak out over 'sex is fun' life styles of young women
(as if this is new?). Barbara Walter's interviews Venezuela's heed of state,
Prez Hugo Chavez.
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/ABCntln070316SexnChavez.wmv




   Generation Next: Speak Up, Be Heard
Journalist Judy Woodruff travels across the U.S. to interview young adults about
their views on technology, social concerns and the future of the U.S. (2007)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/PBSGenNext.wmv


Waking Life
Made in and around, and maybe somewhat inspired by, the character(s) and
ambiance of, Austin, TX. Richard Linklater ("Before Sunrise") wrote and directed
this experimental meditation on reality, which superimposes animation on
live-action video; utilizing people and places around Austin TX. Voices include
Alex Jones (www.InforWars.com), Ethan Hawke, Julie Delpy, Wiley Wiggins, "Speed"
Levitch, Steven Soderbergh and Linklater. (2001)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/WakingLife.wmv

   Waking Life (Higher Speed Version)
(starts after 2 minutes of other promos) Download ONLY (350mb) to playback on
your computer (at 450kbps)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/WakingLifeVH.wmv




   Earth Girls Are Easy (Download ONLY)
Spoof about a Valley Girl (Geena Davis) who finds extraterrestrials in her pool.
Jeff Goldblum. Candy: Julie Brown. Wibok: Jim Carrey. Zeebo: Damon Wayans. Ted:
Charles Rocket. Pool boy: Michael McKean. Directed by Julien Temple. Cast &
Credits: Geena Davis, Jeff Goldblum, Julie Brown, Jim Carrey, Damon Wayans
(1988)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/EarthGirlsEasyH.wmv




Daily Show / Colbert Report: 2007.03.14
Politicizing the FBI. GeoPolitical author (2nd Chance) Zbigniew Brzezinski and
Mountain climber Ed Viesturs
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/DSClbRpt070314.wmv


ABC Nightline: 2007.03.13 Iraq War Case Fraud
Examining the valididty of the 'evidence' & case that launched US into Iraq war.
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/ABCntln070313IraqCaseFraud.\
wmv


60Minutes: 2007.02.25 (Download ONLY)
Mike Wallace interviews Bill O'Reilly; Lara Logan reports on members of the U.S.
military who are petitioning Congress because they are opposed to the war in
Iraq; Bob Simon reports on Jewish survivors who lived in a Czechoslovakian town
that was supposed to show the world how well Nazis were treating Jews during
World War II.
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/60min070225h.wmv


HBO: Ghosts of Abu Ghraib
Potent exposé of the abuse of prisoners at the infamous Iraq prison in the fall
of 2003, detailed by some of the soldiers and detainees involved. Included:
images of torture; interviews with legal scholars and journalists. Directed by
Rory Kennedy. A Grand Jury Prize nominee at the Sundance Film Festival.
(2007.02.22)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/GhostsAbuGhraib.wmv




   Koppel on Discovery: Our Children's Children's War
Former ABC Nightline host, Ted Koppel examines the war on terror; how it's
perceived by the Pentagon as an open-ended engagement; and the changes it has
caused in post-9/11 America. (2007)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/DSCKidsKidsWar.wmv




   NOTE: if any of these LoRez internet playbacks stimulate your interest in
getting a clearer copy, please 'Google' that selection to locate a legal source
if one is not otherwise given already.




   Confessions of a Dangerous Mind (Download ONLY)
George Clooney's directorial debut is a clever, highly stylized romp about '60s
and '70s TV game-show host Chuck Barris (Sam Rockwell), who claims to have led a
double life as a CIA hit man. Clooney plays Barris's agency mentor. Charlie
Kaufman wrote the screenplay, which is based on Barris's "unauthorized
autobiography." Cast & Credits: Sam Rockwell, Drew Barrymore, George Clooney,
Julia Roberts, Rutger Hauer (2002)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/ConfessionsDangerousMindH.w\
mv



   Syriana, making of
A look at "Syriana," a 2005 political thriller focusing on multiple levels of
the global oil industry. The film stars George Clooney, Matt Damon and Jeffrey
Wright, and was written and directed by Stephen Gaghan, who won a Best
Screenplay Oscar for "Traffic." (2005)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/MakingSyriana.wmv


Syriana (Download ONLY)
A CIA agent, an energy analyst, a prince and an oil tycoon are among those
caught in a web of corruption and betrayal in this engrossing political
thriller. George Clooney, Matt Damon, Jeffrey Wright, Christopher Plummer, Chris
Cooper. Written and directed by Stephen Gaghan. Cast & Credits: George Clooney,
Matt Damon, Jeffrey Wright, Christopher Plummer, Chris Cooper (2005)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/SyrianaH.wmv


PBS Charlie Rose 2007.01.19
Have you seen the movie, Battle of Algiers? Former US Scty of State, Henry
Kissinger, Alistair Horne (Author, Savage War of Peace) & others on today's
middle east conflicts
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/PBSRose070119.wmv


Battle of Algiers (Download ONLY)
Gillo Pontecorvo's prize-winning, semidocumentary re-creation of the Algerian
struggle to overthrow French colonialism, from 1954 to 1962. Mathieu: Jean
Martin. Kader: Yacef Saadi. Dubeis: Tommaso Neri. Ali: Brahim Haggiag. Halima:
Fawzia El Kader. Cast & Credits: Yacef Saadi, Jean Martin, Brahim Haggiag,
Tommaso Neri, Samia Kerbash (1965)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/BattleOfAlgiersH.wmv




   Also See Much More In Folder:
*Featured in AustinLibertyInterNet Radio/TV
Some more recent additions, upgrades or items otherwise of special interest;
before they are re-distributed to other folders in this collection.
   AND the folder
  War & Peace
Initiating physical assault upon innocent persons is wrong




   MilitaryIndustrialComplex: Why We Fight
In a nationally televised 'farewell' address on January 17, 1961, only four days
before John F. Kennedy's inaugural, two term 1950s US Prez Dwight Eisenhower,
who was also a 4 star General and Supreme Commander of the Allied assault
against Hitler in WWII, warned of the dangers of 'undue influence' exerted by
the 'military-industrial complex' (he would know, afterall)
   MoreAt http://www.worldpolicy.org/journal/hartung01.html
   AddressTextAt http://www.eisenhower.utexas.edu/farewell.htm
   WikipediaAt http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military-industrial_complex
   FlashPlaybackAt
http://www.sonyclassics.com/whywefight/main.html




   NOTE: if any of these LoRez internet playbacks stimulate your interest in
getting a clearer copy, please 'Google' that selection to locate a legal source
if one is not otherwise given already.




   PBS Now: For a Better Capitalism
Some commercial leaders promoting improvement in the moral ecology of the
business environment; plus other issues. (2007.03.17)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/PBSNow070316BetterCapitalis\
m.wmv




   the Constant Gardener (Download ONLY)
Expert, thrilling adaptation of John le Carré's best-selling novel exploring
political corruption and pharmaceutical company malfeasance in Africa. Ralph
Fiennes, Rachel Weisz, Bill Nighy. Directed by Fernando Meirelles. Written by
Jeffrey Caine. Cast & Credits: Ralph Fiennes, Rachel Weisz, Hubert Kounde, Danny
Huston, Daniele Harford (2005)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/ConstantGardnerVH.wmv




   PBS Tavis Smiley: 2007.03.13
Author P.J. O'Rourke ("On the Wealth of Nations") and Actress Audra McDonald are
the guests.
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/TS070313oRourke.wmv




   Power of Choice: The Life and Ideas of Milton Friedman (Download ONLY)
A documentary on the life and ideas of Nobel-winning economist Milton Friedman
(1912-2006), with comments from former Federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan;
economists Gary Becker and Paul Samuelson, and former Estonian prime minister
Mart Laar, who modeled his country's economic plan on Friedman's ideas. (2006)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/PowerOfChoiceFriedmanH.wmv




Daily Show / Colbert Report: 2007.03.15
Sandra Bullock and Author Ayaan Hirsi Ali
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/DSClbRpt070315.wmv


the Last Samurai (Download ONLY)
Tom Cruise in beautifully haunting tale of 19th century Japan's violent clash of
old and new culture. A disillusioned Civil War vet (Tom Cruise) undergoes a
spiritual rebirth after he's taken prisoner by samurai warriors in 1876 Japan. A
gripping story with sumptuous visuals and textured characters. Oscar nominee Ken
Watanabe adds solid support as a samurai leader. The film scored three other
Oscar nominations, including Best Sound. Edward Zwick directed and co-wrote the
script. Cruise, who also co-produced, spent two years preparing for the role.
Cast & Credits: Tom Cruise, Ken Watanabe, Timothy Spall, Billy Connolly, Tony
Goldwyn (2003)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/LastSamuraiH.wmv




   DiscoveryChannel: Future Is Now in Japan
Japanese technology, including high-speed bullet trains, human-like robots,
crash-test dummies and electric cars.
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/DSCJapanFutureNow.wmv




HistoryChannel: Barbarians II
(4 hours: Franks 300 AD, Saxons 380 AD, Vandals 406 AD, Lombards 488 AD) 1st hr,
FRANKS: examines the Franks and their invasion of Gaul under the leadership of
Merovius and, later, his grandson, Clovis I. 2nd hr, SAXONS: examines the Saxons
and their sweep across Britannia. Included: the long rivalry between Anglo-Saxon
leaders Edwin and Aethelfrith. 3rd hr, VANDALS: Examining the Vandals and their
infiltration into northern Gaul, Spain and North Africa. Included: profiles of
Vandal leaders Gaiseric and his son, Huneric. Narrator: Clancy Brown. 4th hr,
LOMBARDS: A history of the Lombards in the waning Roman Empire and their
conquest of Italy. Included: profiles of Lombard kings Alboin and Liutprand.
(2007)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/HCBarbarians2.wmv


HistoryChannel: the Dark Ages (Download ONLY)
Examining Europe's grim six-century-long period marked by famine, plague,
persecutions and a persistent state of war that began with the fall of Rome in
the fifth century A.D., and ended with the first Crusade. Also explored are the
historical figures, including Clovis, Charles Martel, Alfred the Great,
Charlemagne and St. Benedict, who brought stability and order to civilization
during the era. Also explored are the period's political and cultural ideas that
would shape Europe in the future. (2007)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/HCDarkAgesH.wmv


HistoryChannel: a. Crusades in the 'Holy Land'
part 1 of 2 is two hours of four
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/Crusades1.wmv

   HistoryChannel: b. Crusades in the 'Holy Land'
part 2 of 2 is two hours of four
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/Crusades2.wmv


Kingdom of Heaven (Download ONLY)
Ridley Scott ("Gladiator") directed this sweeping epic about a blacksmith
(Orlando Bloom) who joins the Crusades and tries to achieve peace between
Muslims and Christians. Liam Neeson, David Thewlis, Jeremy Irons, Edward Norton,
Eva Green. Cast & Credits: Orlando Bloom, Liam Neeson, David Thewlis, Jeremy
Irons, Edward Norton (2005)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/KingdomOfHeavenVH.wmv


HistoryChannel: Knights Templar
Lost Worlds: Examining places associated with the Knights Templar, including the
city of Tortosa, which is now covered by the modern Syrian city of Tartus; and
their headquarters at the Temple Mount in Jerusalem. (2006)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/HCKnightsTemplar.wmv




   Muhammad: Legacy of a Prophet
American Muslims describe how they live their lives of faith in this
documentary, which also chronicles the life of "the final prophet" (570-632).
Muhammad's message, says biographer Karen Armstrong: "We must treat each other
well." Some 1400 years later, New York City fire marshal Kevin James feels "a
personal commitment" to Islam's founder. James, like program co-producers
Michael Wolfe and Alexander Kronemer, is a convert. Andre Braugher narrates.
(2002)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/PBSMuhammadLegacy.wmv




HistoryChannel: Ottoman Empire
The War Machine: A history of the Ottoman Empire from the 13th to the 20th
centuries focuses on military campaigns. Included: a profile of Mustafa Kemal,
who founded the Republic of Turkey after the dissolution of the empire following
World War I. (2006)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/HCOttomanEmpire.wmv


Lawrence of Arabia: The Battle for the Arab World (Download ONLY)
PBS 2hr documentary providing much insight to today's middle east turmoil.
Biography of T.E. Lawrence (1888-1935), the dashing British officer who fought
alongside Arabs in their quest for independence from the Ottoman Empire during
World War I, and who was immortalized in David Lean's 1962 masterpiece,
"Lawrence of Arabia." The real Lawrence (seen here in atmospheric re-creations
and in Lowell Thomas newsreels) was emotionally troubled (one of the
interviewees is a psychologist) and he had good reason to be: The Arabs he
fought beside were being deceived by his British superiors. And one legacy of
this duplicity is today's Middle East situation. (2003)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/LawrenceArabia.wmv


Lawrence of Arabia (Download ONLY)
The restored version (almost 4hrs) of David Lean's Oscar-winning epic about T.E.
Lawrence (Peter O'Toole), who led the Arab revolt against the Turks during WWI.
Prince Feisal: Alec Guinness. Sherif Ali: Omar Sharif. Auda Abu Tayi: Anthony
Quinn. Allenby: Jack Hawkins. Turkish Bey: Jose Ferrer. Brighton: Anthony
Quayle. Dryden: Claude Rains. (1962)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/LawrenceOfArabiaH.wmv




   PBS Tavis Smiley: 2007.03.12
Actress Penelope Cruz and movie about Iraq director James Longley are the
guests.
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/TS070312.wmv




AmericanMasters: Joni Mitchell
Woman of Heart and Mind: A profile of veteran singer-songwriter Joni Mitchell,
who can "distill an experience or feeling and put it into song better than
anybody," says David Crosby. The program includes performance footage (dating
back to 1966), and interviews with Mitchell, James Taylor, Tom Rush, Herbie
Hancock, Eric Anderson, New York Times critic Stephen Holden, David Geffen (her
one-time agent), Larry Klein (a former husband) and ex-lover Graham Nash. (2003)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/PBSAmMastersJoniMitchell.wm\
v




   Austin City Limits: James Blunt; James McMurtry (Download ONLY)
British pop-rock star James Blunt performs songs from his "Back to Bedlam" CD,
including the hit "You're Beautiful." Also: Texas singer-songwriter James
McMurtry. (2007.01.19)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/ACLBluntMcMurtryVH.wmv





       Also See Much More In Folder:
   *Featured in AustinLibertyInterNet Radio/TV
Some more recent additions, upgrades or items otherwise of special interest;
before they are re-distributed to other folders in this collection.

   AND in the folder....
    War & Peace
Initiating physical assault upon innocent persons is wrong


       free FROM: AustinLibertyInterNet Radio/TV
at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LibertyProspects/links


   (Due to popular demand, the system is often too busy to respond; so try back
often.  Right click playbacks to 'save target as...' to download selections to
your computer for replay later at your convenience and as often as you want)






                         * 'PeerCasting' continuously now as
'AustinLibertyInterNet'
via 'Yellow Pages' at www.PeerCast.org

Distributed networking like www.PeerCast.org may enable people to
create an alternative to govt licenced & controlled broadcasting.
That can be useful when promoting things that challenge, or may be
inconvenient to, established  authority :)
Please test this (at various times as needed) as an audience member
(or even another 'caster) and let me know of your experience(s).


   ExploreAt http://www.peercast.org/
get a very small self installing program
then select 'yellow pages'
to find 'AustinLibertyInterNet' webcasting
as an experiment by me in 'distributed networking'
then please let me know of your experience















     -Terry Liberty Parker
AND Find More Free On-demand Playbacks On-line via
AustinLibertyInterNet Radio/TV
at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LibertyProspects/links VoiceCall 1.512.462.1776

     every Sunday 7pm (central) to ?
I host informal discussion
to which all are welcome
who want to consider ideas & issues
of Liberty & Justice for ALL

   ON-LINE:

       Look for me (especially Sunday eves) as:

   TxLiberty on Yahoo Messenger




   PicAt http://www.wilsonsalmanac.com/images/byron_naked.jpg












---------------------------------
  Get your own web address.
  Have a HUGE year through Yahoo! Small Business.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Howdy,

Sometimes, it only takes a few minutes to be reminded why we at home should
fight for freedom, while others are being sent off to battle.

Please, watch and listen to this Army Ranger. He did his "duty" in Iraq and
wants to share. We owe him a listen, whether you support the "war" or, not.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5587990522549547050

If you have decided to do something about all this or, if you need another
tool...

http://www.ibize.com/onedollardvd

EDUCATION IS OUR TOTAL STRATEGY AND TRUTH OUR ONLY WEAPON... for now.

Ron

Rick Stanley
Constitutional Activist
E-mail: rick@...


We the People Scoop 3/15/07

========================================================================
WE THE PEOPLE SCOOP - TO EXPOSE!
**  Visit the website: http://www.stanley2002.org
**  OR Our NEW Offshore Site at http://www.wtpconstitutionalactivism.org
**  Like the Scoop? Forward it to everyone you know!
========================================================================


OPINION RELEASE:   Gun Law Update - CORRECTIONS



----- Original Message -----
From: <alan@...>
Subject: Gun Law Update - CORRECTIONS


> Gun Law Update --CORRECTIONS
> Gun Law Update --CORRECTIONS
> Gun Law Update --CORRECTIONS
>
>
> by Alan Korwin, Author
> Gun Laws of America
> http://www.gunlaws.com/gloa.htm
>
>
> March 15, 2007
>
>
>
> Apologies friends and fans --
> I must have been half asleep --
> let me start with the easy errors,
> and progress to the more involved issues:
>
>
>
> WRONG:
> "1- Second Circuit Court Ends D.C. Gun Ban"
>
> RIGHT:
> 1- U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit Ends D.C. Gun
> Ban
>
>
>
> WRONG:
> "By now you've probably heard that the federal 2nd Circuit Court has
> overturned..."
>
> RIGHT:
> By now you've probably hard that the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals has
> overturned... [the 2nd Circuit is up New England way.]
>
>
>
> WRONG:
> "Congress could care less."
>
> RIGHT:
> Syndicated radio host Tom Gresham of Gun Talk notes -- Alan, this means the
> opposite of what you wanted to say. This means that Congress cares. You mean
> to say that Congress could NOT care less. It's common usage, but it means the
> opposite of the intended meaning. Thanks for being on the show Sunday. As
> always, you did a great job. Tom
> http://www.guntalk.com/site.php
>
>
>
> WRONG:
> "The case is named after Cato senior fellow Tom G. Palmer."
> [Dumbest error of them all. Sheesh.]
>
> RIGHT:
> "Parker v. DC" is named after Shelly Parker, an African-American woman who
> lives in DC and had her life threatened by local thugs. I knew that. Cato
> senior fellow Tom G. Palmer was one of the six D.C. residents in the case who
> argued for the right to defend themselves in their homes.
>
>
>
> WRONG:
> "The Cato Institute... lead this successful charge."
>
> RIGHT:
> The Cato Institute does not litigate. It does occasionally file amicus briefs,
> but did not in this case, didn't fund it, and made no arguments. This was a
> personal project by Cato scholar Robert A. Levy, who paid expenses out of his
> pocket, and had legal assistance from colleagues. Lead counsel Alan Gura
> worked for small compensation and co-counsel Clark Neily worked pro bono. Cato
> was supportive on the issues, and weighed in with the media, but was only
> indirectly connected to the case.
>
>
>
> PLUS:
>
> An NBC correspondent objected to how I characterized their coverage of the
> case ("I fear your recent note did not fairly represent the story I did for
> NBC News"). The quote attributed to NBC came directly from the caption at the
> top of their website story, with the glum-faced DC mayor all upset. Admittedly
> their story did go further than the single item I used. On the other hand,
> they didn't lead with jubilant civil rights advocates who were jumping for joy
> nationwide, now that the tyrannical decades-long repression of basic human
> rights had been lifted.
>
> In that sense, the NBC coverage was remarkably similar to the other networks
> and mainstream outlets -- a similarity that leads many in the public to wonder
> about their independence of thought. Why do mainstream stories have such a
> uniform slant, which so often does not harmonize with what the public thinks?
>
> Note to correspondent -- I don't recall seeing any reports from NBC on armed
> self defense, even though by all accounts these occur frequently in America;
> yet I frequently see isolated criminal acts involving guns from remote areas
> of the country on national news. This leads many to believe NBC has a bias
> against all the good that guns do -- saving lives, stopping crime, family
> enjoyment and the rest. How would you respond to that claim?
>
>
>
> Aaron Zelman, the head of Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership
> asked for a public apology, and here it is. They are definitely not "shouting
> from the rooftops with joy" as I indicated by batching them with other
> gun-rights advocates who are. They are keenly aware of the downsides of the
> decision, and the huge potential damage an appeal could cause. Check them out
> here: http://www.jpfo.org. And Aaron, let's not overlook the court's reliance
> on permit schemes instead of rights, easy acceptance of onerous conditions
> like mandated training and registrations, reasoned discussion of the bogus
> individual/collectivist subterfuge, and the severe limit of the decision to
> people only in their homes.
>
>
>
> Author and scholar Dave Hardy observes:
> "And the dissent is ... weird. It doesn't say there is no individual right, it
> says the right doesn't apply in DC because it was meant to protect states
> against federal tyranny and DC is not a State. If that sounds rather
> nonsensical ... well, that's the best I can read it."
>
>
>
> Syndicated columnist Vin Suprynowicz notes:
> Unfortunately, ALL THREE judges ruled there's no right to keep and bear arms.
> Yes, yes, I know two of them SAID there's a fundamental individual right. They
> then proceeded to instruct D.C. to issue the plaintiff a PERMIT to own and
> carry a weapon, but ONLY IN HIS OWN HOUSE. How can you issue a PERMIT to
> exercise a RIGHT? Got your Freedom of Religion Permit? Don't try to use it
> outside your own house, now!
>
> I have to agree with Vin, and have been a long-time foe of all the permit
> schemes so willingly embraced by gun-rights advocates everywhere. See, for
> example, "Reciprocity Schemes" http://www.gunlaws.com/recsch.htm. The question
> before us is one of incrementalism, and politics being the art of the
> possible. We can, like libertarian purists do, stand on perfect philosophical
> grounds and be crushed, or stand by and watch politicos of every stripe do
> battle in the belly of the beast and gather up what crumbs may fall. Yeah,
> mixed metaphor. And a tough call. For complaints on that point, please place
> finger in electrical outlet.
>
>
>
> Item (6) about the gun lobby being less than unified on the merits of this
> case (and that's putting it nicely) will be explored in a story under
> development (not by me), and I'll let you know when there is news.
>
>
>
> And finally, news media everywhere characterized this as a battle between the
> "individual rights" and "collective rights" interpretations of the Second
> Amendment Right to Keep and Bear Arms. The New York Times: "unconstitutional
> on the ground that the Second Amendment protects the rights of individuals, as
> opposed to the collective rights of state militias."
>
> That is a fallacious, underhanded and preposterous deception, because the
> "collective rights" nonsense was invented late last century solely as a way to
> attack this basic human right. Into the 1960s nearly every high school in
> NYT's home turf had a firing range and rifle team, and there was virtually no
> debate on whether you had a right to arms -- it's a new concoction (but why
> let that stop the Gray Lady).
>
> Attorney Stephen Halbrook's extensive historical research lead him to this
> interesting conclusion:
>
> "In recent years it has been suggested that the Second Amendment protects the
> 'collective' right of states to maintain militias, while it does not protect
> the right of 'the people' to keep and bear arms. If anyone entertained this
> notion in the period during which the Constitution and Bill of Rights were
> debated and ratified, it remains one of the most closely guarded secrets of
> the eighteenth century, for no known writing surviving from the period between
> 1787 and 1791 states such a thesis. The phrase 'the people' meant the same
> thing in the Second Amendment as it did in the First, Fourth, Ninth and Tenth
> Amendments -- that is, each and every free person."
>
> In further research he discovered:
>
> The "collective rights" theory originated in U.S. v. Tot, (1943). The
> historical references in Tot simply do not support its thesis. See Halbrook,
> That Every Man Be Armed 189-191 (1984). http://www.gunlaws.com/books3.htm.
> Subsequent cases merely string cite to earlier cases which are ultimately
> traceable to Tot. http://www.gunlaws.com/SCGC-News.html.
>
>
> Stephen's work is just SO good.
> And thanks, y'all, for your patience with me.
>
> Alan.
>
>
> ==========
>
>
> If this report works for you --
> tell your friends!
> Sign up (or off) for email delivery:
> alan@...
>
>
> ----------
>
> Do something good for yourself --
> get a book or two your school teachers
> would NEVER recommend:
> http://www.gunlaws.com
>
>
> Back in stock after a brief outage:
> Knife Laws of the 50 States!
> Perfect for travelers.
> http://www.gunlaws.com/KnifeLawsof50States.htm
>
>
>
> Thanks for reading!
> Alan Korwin, Author
> Gun Laws of America
> http://www.gunlaws.com/gloa.htm
>
>
>
>
>
>
> WE'VE MOVED -- JAN. 1, 2007!!
>
> Alan Korwin
> Bloomfield Press
> "We publish the gun laws."
> 4848 E. Cactus, #505-440  <-- NEW STREET ADDRESS
> Scottsdale, AZ 85254  <-- NEW STREET ADDRESS
> 602-996-4020 Phone
> 602-494-0679 Fax
> 1-800-707-4020 Orders
> http://www.gunlaws.com
> alan@...
> Call, write, fax or click for free full-color catalog
>
>
> If you can read this, thank a teacher.
> If you're reading this in English, thank a veteran.
>
>
> "No one could make a greater mistake than he who did nothing
> because he could do only a little."
> --Edmund Burke

======================================================================
Disclaimer: Information shared in the Stanley Scoop is not necessarily
the opinion of the editor or staff.  It is shared for information
purposes only and it is recommended that you come to your own conclusions.
======================================================================
Live Free or Die! Liberty in our Lifetime!
We the People Scoop
http://www.stanley2002.org
http://www.wtpconstitutionalactivism.org
Reply to: rick@...

Also check out The Revolutionary Coalition!
This group is working to unite all third parties that defend the
constitution, independents, and non-voters (making up 60% of
Americans) into one SUPER THIRD PARTY!

On Yahoo groups at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TheRevolutionaryCoalition

This group has a single line platform: "To defend our (Natural)
God-given, unalienable, Constitutionally protected and guaranteed
rights."

Subscribe by sending email to:
therevolutionarycoalition-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

To subscribe to the We the People Constitutional Activism Scoop,
send a message to subscribe@...

If you wish to unsubscribe from We the People Constitutional Activism Scoop,
send a message to unsubscribe@...

All other changes for personal attention, such as changing your email address,
send to
webmaster@...

Be aware that you may be receiving mail forwarded from a group,
in which case you may have to visit http://groups.yahoo.com to unsubscribe.
Please also note that mail sent to our "reply to:" address,
newsletter@... is usually ignored....




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Rick Stanley
Constitutional Activist
E-mail: rick@...


We the People Scoop 3/11/07

========================================================================
WE THE PEOPLE SCOOP - TO EXPOSE!
**  Visit the website: http://www.stanley2002.org
**  OR Our NEW Offshore Site at http://www.wtpconstitutionalactivism.org
**  Like the Scoop? Forward it to everyone you know!
========================================================================


OPINION RELEASE:  Turn off the life support: America is dead



Subject: Turn off the life support: America is dead


Turn off the life support: America is dead

By DOUG THOMPSON

03/09/07 "Capital Hill Blue" -- -- Maybe, just maybe, it's time to pull the plug
on this failed democratic republic called The United States of America.

Turn off the life support. Disconnect the IVs. Bring in the priest for last
rites. The US of A is brain dead with no chance for revival.

Some 40 years ago, I lost friends in the heat and squalor of Vietnam. They died
in a war that never needed to be fought, supporting a cause that didn't exist
for a government that lied to justify the fight.

A few years later, as a young reporter, I wrote about the attempts of Richard
Milhous Nixon to destroy the Constitution of the United States. He failed
because the system worked and both Congress and the Supreme Court exercised
their powers in our system of checks and balances to restore order to a
faltering nation.

"The lessons of Vietnam and Watergate provide a roadmap for the future," I wrote
at the time. "With luck, our leaders can use that roadmap to avoid the mistakes
of the past."

Now, 33-and-a-half years after the Vietnam War came to an end without resolution
and Nixon left office without honor, I'm losing family of friends in the heat
and squalor of Iraq. They die in a war that never needed to be fought,
supporting a cause that doesn't exist for a government that lied to justify
their sacrifices.

Another despot occupies the Presidency, an evil man whose lust for power
surpasses Nixon and who poses a far greater danger to the Constitution. This
time, however, the system is failing to protect America from despots. George W.
Bush rides roughshod over a compliant Congress. The Supreme Court, packed with
knee-jerk right-wingers who helped put Bush in office in 2000, abdicated its
role long ago.

For a moment - a brief one to be sure - we held out hope that the voice of the
voters might be heard after the November midterm elections. But turning out the
corrupt Republican leadership of Congress was not enough. Democrats who control
the House lack the balls to take Bush on and the razor-thin majority in the
Senate can't even get a vote together on a non-binding resolution.

Democrats Thursday unveiled a plan to bring troops home by the end of 2008 but
Bush is already threatening a veto if the bill gets out of Congress, which is
probably won't.

In the meantime, we've learned that Bush lied about both the size and cost of
his "troop surge" that he claims will bring peace and stability to Iraq. Not
only are we sending more troops in than he said, at a cost far higher than he
projected, his own general on the ground says they will have to stay longer than
he told the American people earlier this year.

Over at the U.S. Department of Justice, an contradiction of terms if we over
heard one, the FBI has lied repeatedly about its use, and abuse, of the
rights-robbing USA Patriot Act to obtain information on U.S. citizens. I find it
disturbing that in all their rhetoric about restoring America to the people, the
new Democratic leadership of Congress doesn't say a damn thing about repealing
the USA Patriot Act, an ill-conceived bill crafted by former attorney general
John Ashcroft, and hastily voted into law after 9/11 by shell-shocked
representatives and Senators who later admitted they hadn't even read it.

Today we learn that the federal government, at the direction of the White House,
routinely ignores the Freedom of Information Act and hides more and more
government documents under a cloak of secrecy.

Both Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid
joined with Republicans to vote not only for original passage of the USA Patriot
Act but also to reauthorize it. Bush has used the act to justify spying on
Americans, wiretapping without warrants and strip away the last protections of
the Constitution.

While Congress slept and the Supreme Court looked the other way, the Bush
administration has gone on its merry way seizing absolute control of the United
States government. He fired independent thinking U.S. attorneys, replacing them
with lockstep right-wingers who share his view of totalitarian control of
government. He ignores the laws of Congress, issuing "signing statements" that
give him the power to do whatever he wants. When the federal courts declared his
wiretapping of Americans illegal, he ignored the ruling and appointed an
in-house review panel that declared the program "legal."

It doesn't matter who controls Congress. Congress is a dead institution, ruled
by timid legislators who no longer exercise any real role in the governing of
this nation.

It doesn't matter what the Supreme Court may or may not do. The President of the
United States has declared himself a "war time President" and granted himself
dictatorial rights that no one in Congress or the Court appears able to
successfully challenge him.

The America we used to cherish is dead, replaced by a ruthless dictator. The
America that more than 3,100 men and women died for in Iraq no longer exists. We
might as well pull the sheet over Uncle Sam's head and prepare for the funeral.

Or can we, as a people, regain control of our government? Perhaps, but doing so
will require drastic measures. I'm not talking about kicking out one party of
political hacks and replacing it with another: Been there, done that, witnessed
the failure.

We need to rethink this experiment called America. Maybe we need to start with a
clean sheet of paper. Maybe it's time to recognize that our present America is a
rotting corpse, devoured from within by the cancer of politics, corruption,
greed and a lust for power.

Maybe it's time for a new American Revolution. After all, the last one started
because another guy named George tried to destroy our way of life.
Click here to comment on this and other articles
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed
without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational purposes. Information Clearing
House has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of

Thomas Mario of the family Costanzo
Predicting the future is easy to do, Tom...it's the WHEN that's the hard part.
Larry V. Thomason
If life boxes you into a corner, Paint a Picture.
Its easier to make a million dollars than coin a phrase.
All of us get lost in the darkness, dreamers learn to steer by the stars.

======================================================================
Disclaimer: Information shared in the Stanley Scoop is not necessarily
the opinion of the editor or staff.  It is shared for information
purposes only and it is recommended that you come to your own conclusions.
======================================================================
Live Free or Die! Liberty in our Lifetime!
We the People Scoop
http://www.stanley2002.org
http://www.wtpconstitutionalactivism.org
Reply to: rick@...

Also check out The Revolutionary Coalition!
This group is working to unite all third parties that defend the
constitution, independents, and non-voters (making up 60% of
Americans) into one SUPER THIRD PARTY!

On Yahoo groups at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TheRevolutionaryCoalition

This group has a single line platform: "To defend our (Natural)
God-given, unalienable, Constitutionally protected and guaranteed
rights."

Subscribe by sending email to:
therevolutionarycoalition-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

To subscribe to the We the People Constitutional Activism Scoop,
send a message to subscribe@...

If you wish to unsubscribe from We the People Constitutional Activism Scoop,
send a message to unsubscribe@...

All other changes for personal attention, such as changing your email address,
send to
webmaster@...

Be aware that you may be receiving mail forwarded from a group,
in which case you may have to visit http://groups.yahoo.com to unsubscribe.
Please also note that mail sent to our "reply to:" address,
newsletter@... is usually ignored....




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Rick Stanley
Constitutional Activist
E-mail: rick@...


We the People Scoop 3/11/07

========================================================================
WE THE PEOPLE SCOOP - TO EXPOSE!
**  Visit the website: http://www.stanley2002.org
**  OR Our NEW Offshore Site at http://www.wtpconstitutionalactivism.org
**  Like the Scoop? Forward it to everyone you know!
========================================================================


OPINION RELEASE:  Jury Has The Right to Judge the Facts and the Law [ Part 1 of
3]



----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill" <billmay@...>
Subject:  Jury Has The Right to Judge the Facts and the Law [ Part 1 of 3]


The statutory, non-constitutional courts that have been imposed upon us from the
fed USDC down will simply tell you that this case has no weight in their court.

A decision from a court that was based upon constitutional jurisdiction where
the gov acts only in accordance with limited delegated authority has no bearing
on that section of gov that is acting in its sovereign capacity over subjects -
such as in the legislative jurisdiction courts.

The issue is not what the courts are doing.  They have openly told us because
they realize that we are so brainwashed that we cannot comprehend what we are
being told.  What we cannot or will not comprehend we cannot properly take into
consideration and act on.

There is no question as to what the gov and its legislative courts are doing.
The gov brings the claim as the plaintiff and clearly states that no
constitution is relevant in those courts.  These are the fact.  They are not in
dispute.

The ONLY question - and one that everyone should be demanding an answer to is,
"under what authority is everyone now under [fed] legislative jurisdiction?"

There is no other question before us at this time.  We argue about our rights in
courts that have told us that they cannot see any bill of rights without the
consent of Congress.

We are unwilling to accept what they are saying - even though their actions are
completely in harmony with their statements.  We refuse to accept all the
evidence before us and act on it.

We need to accept the evidence, which is easy to get, accept that the gov has
deemed us without rights - and organize well enough to demand the authority for
the actions of the gov.

If the highest court refuses to even compel the disclosure of the authority of
our servitude to a new sovereign gov - then we can publish this fact so that the
smug theory of freedom will vanish and all Americans can unite for a common
cause against a known and proven enemy gov.

Not until we accept the fact that we are seen as mere subjects without rights in
all the courts can we start to move to actually addressing the problem that we
all face - and organize to demand that the constititons be reinstated as law.

This gov, like all govs, absolutely depend upon the cooporation of the people
that it enslaves to enforce slavery upon them.  If it could be published, as a
matter of court documented fact, that our gov now has officially declared the
people to be mere subjects without any protected rights - it might not be too
late for the people to use their enfluence to cause the police agencies to move
against these slave masters and cause a reversal in what is happening.  The
judges and most attorney are clearly lost and without the ability to be
redeemed.  No one who knowingly and ententionally enslaves their fellow man for
money and power while lying to them can be deemed salvageable.

Their fate should be decided in a constitutional court of law after proper
inditement.

Bill - Oregon


Subject: Jury Has The Right to Judge the Facts and the Law [ Part 1 of 3]




Judges do not have the right to deprive the Jury of Acting in their own right to
decide both wrong of deed and right or wrong of the law the law [ Part 1 of 3]

Sparf & Hansen v. U S, 156 U.S. 51 (1895)
Mr. Justice GRAY, with whom concurred Mr. Justice SHIRAS, dissenting.

Mr. Justice SHIRAS and myself concur in so much of the opinion of the majority
of the court as awards a new trial to one of the defendants by reason of the
admission in evidence against him of confessions made in his absence by the
other.

But from the greater part of that opinion, and from the affirmance of the
conviction of the other defendant, we are compelled to dissent, because, in our
judgment, the case, involving the question of life or death to the prisoners,
was not submitted to the decision of the jury as required by the constitution
and laws of the United States.

The two defendants, Herman Sparf and Hans Hansen, together with Thomas St.
Clair, seamen on board the brig Hesper, an American vessel, were indicted for
the murder of Maurice Fitzgerald, the second mate, on the high seas, on January
13, 1893, by striking him with a weapon, and by throwing him overboard and
drowning him.

St. Clair was separately tried, convicted, and sentenced, and his conviction was
affirmed by this court at the last term. 154 U.S. 134, 14 Sup. Ct. 1002. At the
trial of Sparf and Hansen, there was no direct testimony of any eyewitness to
the killing, or to any assault or affray. There was evidence that at 10 o'clock
in the evening of the day in question the second mate was at the wheel, in
charge of the starboard watch, consisting of St. Clair, Sparf, Hansen, and
another seaman; and that, when the watch was changed at midnight, the second
mate could not be found, and there was much blood on the deck, as well as a
bloody broomstick and a wooden bludgeon. The rest of the evidence consisted of
testimony of other seamen to acts and statements of each defendant and of St.
Clair, before and after the disappearance of the second mate, tending to prove a
conspiracy to kill him; and to subsequent confessions of Hansen, tending to show
that the killing was premeditated.

The judge, in his charge to the jury, gave the following instructions: 'The
indictment is based upon section 5339 of the Revised Statutes, which provides,
among other things, that 'every person who commits murder' 'upon the high seas,
or in any arm of the sea, or in any river, haven, creek, basin or bay, within
the admiralty and maritime jurisdiction of the United States, and out of the
jurisdiction of any particular state, or who upon any of such waters maliciously
strikes, stabs, wounds, poisons or shoots at any other person, of which
striking, stabbing, wounding, poisoning or shooting such other person dies,
either on land or at sea, within or without the United States, shall suffer
death."

   a.. 'Murder is the unlawful killing of a human being in the peace of the
state, with malice aforethought, express or implied.' 'Express malice' was
defined as 'deliberate premeditation and design, formed in advance, to kill or
to do bodily harm, the premeditation and design being implied from external
circumstances capable of proof, such as lying in wait, antecedent threats, and
concerted schemes against a victim'; and 'implied malice' as 'an inference of
the law from any deliberate and cruel act committed by one person against
another,' 'that is, malice is inferred when one kills another without
provocation, or when the provocation is not great.' 'Manslaughter is the
unlawful killing of a human being without malice, either express or implied. I
do not consider it necessary, gentlemen, to explain it further; for, if a
felonious homicide has been committed, - of which you are to be the judges from
the proof, - there is nothing in this case to reduce it below the grade of
murder.' 'Every person present at a murder, willingly aiding or abetting its
perpetration, is guilty of murder, and may be indicted and convicted as
principal in the first degree.' 'It is not my purpose, nor is it my function, to
assume any fact to be proven, nor to suggest to you that any fact has been
proven. You are the exclusive judges of the facts.'

The defendants requested the judge to instruct the jury that 'under the
indictment in this case the defendants may be convicted of murder or
manslaughter or of an attempt to commit murder or manslaughter; and if, after a
full and careful consideration of all the evidence before you, you believe
beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendants are guilty either of manslaughter,
or of an assault with intent to commit murder or manslaughter, you should so
find your verdict.' The judge refused to give this instruction, and the
defendants excepted to the refusal.

The jury, after deliberating on the case for some time, returned into court,
and, being asked whether they had agreed upon a verdict, the foreman said that
one of the jurors wished to be instructed upon certain points under the laws of
the United States as to murder upon the high seas. One of the jurors then said
that he 'would like to know, in regard to the interpretation of the laws of the
United States in regard to manslaughter, as to whether the defendants can be
found guilty of manslaughter, or that the defendants must be found guilty,'
evidently meaning 'of murder,' the whole offense charged in the indictment. The
judge then read again section 5339 of the Revised Statutes. The juror asked.
'Are the two words 'aiding' or 'abetting' defined?' The judge replied: 'The
words 'aiding or abetting' are not defined. But I have instructed you as to the
legal effect of aiding and abetting, and this you should accept as law. If I
have made an error, there is a higher tribunal to correct it.' The juror said:
'I am the spokesman for two of us. We desire to clearly understand the matter.
It is a barrier in our mind to our determining the matter. The question arising
amongst us is as to aiding and abetting. Furthermore, as I understand, it must
be one thing or the other. It must be either guilty or not guilty.' The judge
replied: 'Yes, under the instructions I have given you.' The judge, then, after
repeating the general definitions, as before given, of murder and of
manslaughter, said: 'If a felonious homicide has been committed by either of the
defendants, - of which you are to be the judges from the proof, - there is
nothing in this case to reduce it below the grade of murder;' and in answer to
further questions of the juror repeated this again and again, and said: 'In a
proper case, it may be murder, or it may be manslaughter, but in this case it
cannot properly be manslaughter.' The defendants excepted to these instructions.
And finally, in answer to the juror's direct question, 'Then there is no other
verdict we can bring in, except guilty or not guilty?' the judge said: 'In a
proper case, a verdict for manslaughter may be rendered, as the district
attorney has stated; and even in this case you have the physical power to do so;
but, as one of the tribunals of the country, a jury is expected to be governed
by law, and the law it should receive from the court.' The juror then said:
'There has been a misunderstanding amongst us. Now, it is clearly interpreted to
us, and no doubt we can now agree on certain facts.' Thereupon a verdict of
guilty of murder was returned against both defendants, and they were sentenced
to death, and sued out this writ of error.

The judge, by instructing the jury that they were bound to accept the law as
given to them by the court, denied their right to decide the law. And by
instructing them that, if a felonious homicide by the defendants was proved,
there was nothing in the case to reduce it below the grade of murder, and they
could not properly find it to be manslaughter, and by declining to submit to
them the question whether the defendants were guilty of manslaughter only, he
denied their right to decide the fact. The colloquy between the judge and the
jurors, when they came in for further instructions, clearly shows that the jury,
after deliberating upon the case, were in doubt whether the crime which the
defendants had committed was murder or manslaughter; and that it was solely by
reason of these instructions of the judge that they returned a verdict of the
higher crime.

It is our deep and settled conviction, confirmed by a re-examination of the
authorities under the responsibility of taking part in the consideration and
decision of the capital case now before the court, that the jury, upon the
general issue of guilty or not guilty in a criminal case, have the right, as
well as the power, to decide, according to their own judgment and consciences,
all questions, whether of law or of fact, involved in that issue.

The question of the right of the jury to decide the law in criminal cases has
been the subject of earnest and repeated controversy in England and America, and
eminent jurists have differed in their conclusions upon the question. In this
country, the opposing views have been fully and strongly set forth by Chancellor
Kent in favor of the right of the jury, and by Chief Justice Lewis against it,
in People v. Croswell, 3 Johns. Cas. 337; by Judge Hall in favor of the right,
and by Judge Bennett against it, in State v. Croteau, 23 Vt. 14; and by Chief
Justice Shaw against the right, and by Mr. Justice Thomas in its favor, in Com.
v. Anthes, 5 Gray, 185.

The question of the right of the jury under the constitution of the United
States cannot be usefully or satisfactorily discussed without examining and
stating the authorities which bear upon the scope and effect of the provisions
of the constitution regarding this subject. In pursuing this inquiry, it will be
convenient to consider, first, the English authorities; secondly, the
authorities in the several colonies and states of America; and lastly, the
authorities under the national government of the United States.

By Magna Charta, no person could be taken or imprisoned or deprived of his
freehold or of his liberties or free customs, unless by the lawful judgment of
his peers, or the law of the land, - 'nisi per legale judicium parium suorum,
vel per legem terrae.' Accordingly, by the law of England, at the time of the
discovery and settlement of this country by Englishmen, every subject (not a
member of the house of lords) indicted for treason, murder, or other felony had
the right to plead the general issue of not guilty, and thereupon to be tried by
a jury; and, if they acquitted him the verdict of acquittal was conclusive, in
his favor, of both the law and the fact involved in the issue. The jury, in any
case, criminal or civil, might indeed, by finding a special verdict reciting the
facts, refer a pure question of law to the court; but they were not bound and
could not be compelled to do so, even in a civil action.

By the statute of 2 Westm. (13 Edw. I.) c. 30, 'it is ordained that the justices
assigned to take assizes shall not compel the jurors to say precisely whether it
be disseisin or not, so that they do shew the truth of the fact, and require aid
of the justices; but, if they of their own head will say that it is or is not
disseisin, their verdict shall be admitted at their own peril.' 1 St. Realm, 86.
That statute, as Lord Coke tells us, was declaratory of the common law; and
before its enactment some justices directed juries to return general verdicts,
thus subjecting them to the peril of an attaint if they mistook the law. 2 Inst.
422, 425.

Littleton, speaking of civil actions in which the jury, upon the general issue
pleaded, might return a special verdict, says that, 'if they will take upon them
the knowledge of the law upon the matter, they may give their verdict generally,
as is put in their charge.' Co. Litt. 368. And accordingly Lord Coke says:
'Although the jury, if they will take upon them (as Littleton here saith) the
knowledge of the law, may give a general verdict, yet it is dangerous for them
so to do; for, if they do mistake the law, they run into the danger of an
attaint; therefore to find the special verdict is the safest, where the case is
doubtful.' Co. Litt. 227b.

Lord Coke elsewhere says that 'the jury ought, if they will not find the special
matter, to find 'at their peril' according to law.' Rawlyns' Case, 4 Coke, 52a,
53b. And Lord Chief Justice Hobart says: 'Legally it will be hard to quit a jury
that finds against the law, either common law or several statute law, whereof
all men were to take knowledge, and whereupon verdict is to be given, whether
any evidence be given to them or not,' and 'though no man informed them what the
law was in that case.' Needler v. Bishop of Winchester, Hob. 220, 227.

The peril or danger, above spoken of, into which the jury ran by taking upon
themselves the knowledge of the law, and undertaking to decide by a general
verdict the law involved in the issue of fact submitted to them, was the peril
of an attaint, upon which their verdict might be set aside and themselves
punished. Upon the attaint, however, the trial was not by the court, but by a
jury of twenty-four; it was only by a verdict of the second jury, and not by
judgment of the court only, that the first verdict could be set aside; and, if
not so set aside, the second verdict was final and conclusive. Co. Litt. 293a,
294b; Vin. Abr. 'Attaint,' A. (6); Com. Dig. 'Attaint,' B. Moreover, no attaint
lay in a criminal case. Bushell's Case, Vaughan, 135, 146; King v. Shipley, 4
Doug. 73, 115.

Lord Bacon, in his History of Henry VII. (originally written and published in
English, and afterwards translated into Latin by himself or under his
supervision), speaking of the parliament held in the eleventh year of his reign,
says: 'This parliament also made that good law which gave the attaint upon a
false verdict between party and party, which before was a kind of evangile,
irremediable, - in the Latin, judicia juratorum, quae veredicta vocantur, quae
ante illud tempus evangelii cujusdam instar erant, atque plane irrevocabilia. It
extends not to causes capital; as well because they are for the most part at the
king's suit, as because in them, if they be followed in course of indictment,
there passeth a double jury, the indictors and the triers, and so not twelve
men, but four and twenty. But it seemeth that was not the only reason; for this
reason holdeth not in the appeal, - ubi causa capitalis a parte gravata
peragitur. [That is, the appeal of murder, brought by the heir of the deceased.
See Railroad v. Clarke, 152 U.S. 230, 239, 14 S. Sup. Ct. 579.] But the great
reason was, lest it should tend to the discouragement of jurors in cases of life
and death, - ne forte juratores in causis capitalibus timidius se gererent, - if
they should be subject to suit and penalty, where the favour of life maketh
against them.' 6 Bac. Works (Ed. 1858) 5, 7, 160, 161; 5 Bac. Works (Ed. 1803)
117; 9 Bac. Works, 483.

Lord Bacon was mistaken in assuming that the attaint was introduced by the
statute of 11 Hen. VII. c. 24; for it existed at common law in writs of assize,
and had been regulated and extended to other civil actions by many earlier
statutes. 2 Inst. 130, 237, 427; Finch, Law, lib. 4, c. 47.

But the mistake does not diminish the force of Lord Bacon's statements that,
wherever an attaint did not lie, the 'judgment of the jury, commonly called
'verdict,' was considered as a kind of gospel'; and that the reasons why an
attaint did not lie in a capital case were not only that two juries, the
indictors and the triers, had passed upon the case, but chiefly that juries, in
cases of life and death, should not be discouraged, or act timidly, by being
subjected to suit and penalty if they decided in favor of life.

John Milton, in his Defence of the People of England, after speaking of the
king's power in his courts and through his judges, adds: 'Nay, all the ordinary
power is rather the people's, who determine all controversies themselves by
juries of twelve men. And hence it is that when a malefactor is asked at his
arraignment, 'How will you be tried?' he answers always, according to law and
custom, 'By God and my country'; not by God and the king, or the king's deputy.'
8 Milton, Works (Pickering's Ed.) 198, 199, The idea is as old as Bracton.
Bract. 119.

In the reign of Charles II. some judges undertook to instruct juries that they
must take the law from the court, and to punish them if they returned a verdict
in favor of the accused against the judge's instructions. But, as often as
application was made to higher judicial authority, the punishments were set
aside, and the rights of juries vindicated.

In 1665, upon the trial of an indictment against three Quakers for an unlawful
conventicle. Wagstaffe and other jurors were fined by Chief Justice Kelyng for
acquitting 'against full evidence, and against the direction of the court in
matter of law, in said court openly given and declared,' - 'contra plenam
evidentiam, et contra directionem curiae in materia legis, in dicta curia ibidem
aperte datam et declaratam.' His reasons for this (as stated in his own
manuscript note of the case, not included in the first edition of his Reports,
published by Lord Holt in 1708) were 'that they and others may know that a
willful jury cannot make an act of parliament or the law of England of no
effect, but they are accountable and punishable for it'; and 'that in criminal
cases the court may fine a jury who will give a verdict contrary to their
evidence; and the reason (as I take it) is that otherwise a headstrong jury
might overthrow all the course of justice, for no attaint lieth in criminal
causes, and also one verdict is peremptory, and a new trial cannot be granted in
criminal causes, and therefore the judges have always punished such willful
juries by fine and imprisonment and binding them to their good behaviour.' But
at the end of his report is this memorandum: 'Note. The whole Case of the
Quakers, as to fining jury, now not law.' J. Kelyng (3d Ed.) 69-75. And Lord
Hale, then chief baron, tells us that the jurors 'were thereupon committed, and
brought their habeas corpus in the court of common bench, and all the judges of
England were assembled to consider of the legality of this fine, and the
imprisonment thereupon'; and the jurors were discharged of their imprisonment,
for the following reasons:

   a.. 'It was agreed by all the judges of England (one only dissenting) that
this fine was not legally set upon the jury, for they are the judges of matters
of fact; and although it was inserted in the fine, that it was contra
directionem curiae in materia legis, this mended not the matter, for it was
impossible any matter of law could come in question till the matter of fact were
settled and stated and agreed by the jury, and of such matter of fact they were
the only competent judges. And although the witnesses might perchance swear the
fact to the satisfaction of the court, yet the jury are judges, as well of the
credibility of the witnesses as of the truth of the fact; for possibly they
might know somewhat of their own knowledge that what was sworn was untrue, and
possibly they might know the witnesses to be such as they could not believe, and
it is the conscience of the jury that must pronounce the prisoner guilty or not
guilty. And to say the truth, it were the most unhappy case that could be to the
judge, if he at his peril must take upon him the guilt or innocence of the
prisoner; and if the judge's opinion must rule the matter of fact, the trial by
jury would be useless.' 2 Hale, P. C. 312, 313.

Lord Hale's apparent meaning is that, at a trial upon the plea of not guilty,
the jury are the judges of the issue of fact thereby presented, and it is the
conscience of the jury that must pronounce the prisoner guilty or not guilty;
that, as no matter of law can come in question unless the facts are first found
by the jury in a special verdict, it were idle to say that a general verdict was
against the judge's direction or opinion in matter of law; and that, if the
judge's opinion in matter of law must rule the issue of fact submitted to the
jury, the trial by jury would be useless.

The reasons are more fully brought out in Bushell's Case, in 1670, not mentioned
in the text of Lord Hale's treatise, and doubtless decided after that was
written. William Penn and William Mead having been indicted and tried for a
similar offense, and acquitted against the instructions of the court, Bushell
and the other jurors who tried them were fined by Sir John Howell, recorder of
London, and Bushell was committed to prison, in like terms, for not paying his
fine, and sued out a writ of habeas corpus. Penn and Mead's Case, 6 How. State
Tr. 951; Bushell's Case, Vaughan, 135, 6 How. State Tr. 999; 1 Freem. 1; T.
Jones, 13.

At the hearing thereon, Scroggs, the king's serjeant, argued: 'It is granted
that, in matters of fact only, the jury are to be judges; but, when the matter
of fact is mixed with matter of law, the law is to guide the fact, and they are
to be guided by the court. The jury are at no inconvenience, for if they please
they may find the special matter; but if they will take upon them to know the
law, and do mistake, they are punishable.' 1 Freem. 3.

But Bushell was discharged from imprisonment, for reasons stated in the judgment
delivered by Sir John Vaughan, chief justice of the common pleas, after a
conference of all the judges of England, including Lord Hale, and with the
concurrence of all except Chief Justice Kelyng. Vaughan, 144, 145; 1 Freem. 5;
Lord Holt in Groenvelt v. Burwell, 1 Ld. Raym. 454, 470.

In that great judgment, as reported by himself, Chief Justice Vaughan discussed
separately the two parts of the return: First, that the acquittal was 'against
full and manifest evidence'; and, second, that it was 'against the direction of
the court in matter of law.'

It was in discussing the first part that he observed 'that the verdict of a jury
and evidence of a witness are very different things, in the truth and falsehood
of them. A witness swears but to what he hath heard or seen; generally or more
largely, to what hath fallen under his senses. But a juryman swears to what he
can infer and conclude from the testimony of such witnesses, by the act and
force of his understanding, to be the fact inquired after, which differs nothing
in the reason, though much in the punishment, from what a judge, out of various
cases by him, infers to be the law in the question before him.' Vaughan, 142.

After disposing of that part of the return, he proceeds as follows: 'We come now
to the next part of the return, viz.: That the jury acquitted those indicted
against the direction of the court in matter of law, openly given and declared
to them in court.

   a.. 'The words, 'that the jury did acquit, against the direction of the court
in matter of law,' literally taken, and de plano, are insignificant, and not
intelligible; for on issue can be joined of matter of law, no jury can be
charged with the trial of matter in law barely, no evidence ever was or can be
given to a jury of what is law or not, nor no such oath can be given to or taken
by a jury to try matter in law, nor no attaint can lie for such a false oath.
'Therefore we must take off this vail and color of words, which make a show of
being something, and in truth are nothing.

   a.. 'If the meaning of these words, 'finding against the direction of the
court in matter of law,' be that if the judge, having heard the evidence given
in court (for he knows no other), shall tell the jury, upon this evidence, the
law is for the plaintiff, or for the defendant, and you are under the pain of
fine and imprisonment to find accordingly, then the jury ought of duty so to do.
Every man sees that the jury is but a troublesome delay, great charge, and of no
use in determining right and wrong, and therefore the trials by them may be
better abolished than continued; which were a strange new-found conclusion,
after a trial so celebrated for many hundreds of years.

   a.. 'For if the judge, from the evidence, shall by his own judgment first
resolve upon any trial what the fact is, and so knowing the fact shall then
resolve what the law is, and order the jury penally to find accordingly, what
either necessary or convenient use can be fancied of juries, or to continue
trials by them at all?

   a.. 'But if the jury be not obliged in all trials to follow such directions,
if given, but only in some sort of trials (as, for instance, in trials for
criminal matters upon indictments or appeals), why then the consequence will be,
though not in all, yet in criminal trials, the jury (as of no material use)
ought to be either omitted or abolished, which were the greater mischief to the
people than to abolish them in civil trials.

   a.. 'And how the jury should, in any other manner, according to the course of
trials used, find against the direction of the court in matter of law, is really
not conceptible.' Vaughan, 143, 144.

He then observes: 'This is ordinary, when the jury find unexpectedly for the
plaintiff or defendant, the judge will ask, how do you find such a fact in
particular? and upon their answer he will say, then it is for the defendant,
though they find for the plaintiff, or econtrario, contrario, and thereupon they
rectify their verdict. And in these cases the jury, and not the judge, resolve
and find what the fact is. Therefore always, in discreet and lawful assistance
of the jury, the judge's direction is hypothetical, and upon supposition, and
not positive and upon coercion, viz.: If you find the fact thus (leaving it to
them what to find), then you are to find for the plaintiff; but if you find the
fact thus, then it is for the defendant.' But he is careful to add that
'whatsover they have answered the judge upon an interlocutory question or
discourse they may lawfully vary from it if they find cause, and are not thereby
concluded.' Pages 144, 145.

It is difficult to exhibit the strength of Chief Justice Vaughan's reasoning by
detached extracts from his opinion. But a few other passages are directly in
point:

   a.. 'A man cannot see by another's eye, nor hear by another's ear; no more can
a man conclude or infer the thing to be resolved by another's understanding or
reasoning; and though the verdict be right the jury give, yet they, being not
assured it is so from their own understanding, are forsworn, at least in foro
conscientiae.' Page 148.

   a.. 'That decantatum in our books, 'ad quaestionem facti non respondent
judices, ad quaestionem legis non respondent juratores,' literally taken, is
true; for if it be demanded, what is the fact? the judge cannot answer it; if it
be asked, what is the law in the case? the jury cannot answer it.' He then
explains this by showing that upon demurrers, special verdicts, or motions in
arrest of judgment 'the jury inform the naked fact, and the court deliver the
law.' 'But upon all general issues, as upon not culpable pleaded in trespass,
nil debet in debt, nul tort, nul disseisin in assize, ne disturba pas in quare
impedit, and the like, though it be matter of law whether the defendant be a
trespasser, a debtor, disseisor, or disturber, in the particular cases in issue,
yet the jury find not (as in a special verdict) the fact of every case by
itself, leaving the law to the court, but find for the plaintiff or defendant
upon the issue to be tried, wherein they resolve both law and fact complicately,
and not the fact by itself; so as though they answer not singly to the question
what is the law, yet they determine the law in all matters, where issue is
joined and tried in the principal case, but [i. e. except] where the verdict is
special.' Pages 149, 150.

He then observes that 'to this purpose the Lord Hobart in Needler's Case against
the Bishop of Winchester is very apposite,' citing the passage quoted near the
beginning of this opinion; and concluded his main argument as follows:

   a.. 'The legal verdict of the jury, to be recorded, is finding for the
plaintiff or defendant; what they answer, if asked, to questions concerning some
particular fact, is not of their verdict essentially, nor are they bound to
agree in such particulars; if they all agree to find their issue for the
plaintiff or defendant, they may differ in the motives wherefore [therefor], as
well as judges, in giving judgment for the plaintiff or defendant, may differ in
the reasons wherefore they give that judgment, which is very ordinary.' Page
150.

That judgment thus clearly appears to have been rested, not merely on the
comparatively technical ground that upon the general issue no matter of law
could come in question until the facts had been found by the jury, nor yet upon
the old theory, that the jurors might have personal knowledge of some facts not
appearing in evidence, but mainly on the broad reasons that if the jury,
especially in criminal trials, were obliged to follow the directions of the
court in matter of law, no necessary or convenient use could be found of juries,
or to continue trials by them at all; that though the verdict of the jury be
right according to the law as laid down by the court, yet, if they are not
assured by their own understanding that it is so, they are forsworn, at least in
foro conscientiae; and that the 'decantatum' in our books, 'ad questionem facti
non respondent judices, ad quaestionem legis non respondent juratores,' means
that issues of law, as upon demurrers, special verdicts, or motions in arrest of
judgment, are to be decided by the court; but that upon general issues of fact,
involving matter of law, the jury resolve both law and fact complicately, and so
determine the law.

Notwithstanding that authoritative declaration of the right of the jury, upon
the general issue, to determine the law, Chief Justice Scroggs, upon the trial
of Harris for a seditions libel in 1680 (7 How. State Tr. 925, 930), insisted
that the jury must take the law from the court; and Chief Justice Jeffreys,
presiding at the trial of Algernon Sidney in 1683, charged the jury as follows:
'It is our duty upon our oaths to declare the law to you, and you are bound to
receive our declaration of the law, and upon this declaration to inquire whether
there be a fact, sufficiently proved, to find the prisoner guilty of the high
treason of which he stands indicted.' And Sidney was convicted, sentenced, and
executed. 9 How. State Tr. 817, 889.

In the last year of the reign of James II., the Trial of the Seven Bishops,
reported 12 How. State Tr. 183, took place upon an information for a seditious
libel contained in their petition to the king, praying that he would be pleased
not to insist on their distributing and reading in the churches his declaration
dispensing with the penal statutes concerning the exercise of religion. The
trial was at bar before all the justices of the king's bench, upon a general
plea of not guilty. A principal ground of defense was that the king had no
dispense was therefore the petition of the bishops to him was an innocent
exercise of the right of petition, and was not a libel. In support of this
defense, ancient acts of parliament were given in evidence; and, upon the offer
of one in Norman French, the chief justice said, 'Read it in English, for the
jury to understand it,' and it was so read by a sworn interpreter. Pages 374,
375. And, when the attorney general argued that these matters were not pertinent
to the case, the chief justice, interrupting him, said: 'Yes, Mr. Attorney, I'll
tell you what they offer, which it will lie upon you to give an answer to; they
would have you show how this has disturbed the government, or diminished the
king's authority.' Page 399.

At the close of the arguments, each of the four judges in turn charged the jury.
Lord Chief Justice Wright said: 'The only question before me is, and so it is
before you, gentlemen, it being a question of fact, whether here be a certain
proof of a publication. And then the next question is a question of law, indeed,
whether, if there be a publication proved, it be a libel.' 'Now, gentlemen,
anything that shall disturb the government, or make mischief and a stir among
the people, is certainly within the case of libellus famosis; and I must, in
short, give you my opinion. I do take it to be a libel. Now, this being a point
of law, if my brothers have anything to say to it, I suppose they will deliver
their opinions.'

Mr. Justice Holloway said: 'If you are satisfied there was an ill intention of
sedition, or the like, you ought to find them guilty; but if there be nothing in
the case that you find, but only that they did deliver a petition to save
themselves harmless and to free themselves from blame, by showing the reason of
their disobedience to the king's command, which they apprehended to be a
grievance to them, and which they could not in conscience give obedience to, I
cannot think it is a libel. It is left to you, gentlemen, but that is my
opinion.'

Mr. Justice Powell also expressed his opinion that the paper was not a libel,
and said: 'Now, gentlemen, the matter of it is before you; you are to consider
of it, and it is worth your consideration.' He then expressed his opinion that
the king had no dispensing power, and concluded: 'If this be once allowed of,
there will need no parliament; all the legislation will be in the king, which is
a thing worth considering, and I leave the issue to God and your consciences.'

Mr. Justice Allybone, after saying, 'The single question that falls to may share
is, to give my sense of this petition, whether it shall be in construction of
law a libel in itself, or a thing of great innocence,' expressed his opinion
that it was a libel.

The jury, on retiring, requested, and were allowed by the court, to take with
them the statute book, the information, the petition of the bishops, and the
declaration of the king; and they returned a verdict of not guilty, whereat
there was great popular rejoicing in London and throughout England. 12 How.
State Tr. 425-431; 1 Burnet's Own Time, 744.

It thus clearly appears that upon that trial, one of the most important in
English history, deeply affecting the liberties of the people, the four judges
of the king's bench, while differing among themselves upon the question whether
the petition of the bishops was a libel, concurred in submitting that question,
as a question of law, to the decision of the jury, not as umpires between those
judges who thought the paper was a libel and those judges who thought it was
not, but as the tribunal vested by the law of England with the power and the
right of ultimately determining, as between the crown and the accused, all
matters of law, as well as of fact, involved in the general issue of guilty or
not guilty.

Upon the accession of William and Mary, parliament declared the king's power of
dispensing with the laws to be unlawful; and reversed the conviction of Algernon
Sidney, 'for a partial and unjust construction of the statute' of treasons in
the instructions by which his conviction had been procured. St. 1 W. & M. Sess.
2, c. 2; 6 St. Realm, 143, 155; 9 How. State Tr. 996. And early in the new reign
Holt was appointed lord chief justice, and Somers lord keeper.

Lord Somers, in the opening pages of his essay on 'The Security of Englishmen's
Lives. or the Trust, Power, and Duty of the Grand Juries of England' (first
published in 1681, and republished in 1714, towards the end of his life, after
he had been lord chancellor), lays down in the clearest terms the right of the
jury to decide the law, saying: 'It is made a fundamental in our government that
(unless it be by parliament) no man's life shall be touched for any crime
whatsoever, save by the judgment of at least twenty-four men, - that is, twelve
or more, to find the bill of indictment, whether he be peer of the realm or
commoner; and twelve peers or above, if a lord, if not, twelve commoners, to
give the judgment upon the general issue of not guilty joined.' 'The office and
power of these juries is judicial. They only are the judges from whose sentence
the indicted are to expect life or death. Upon their integrity and understanding
the lives of all that are brought into judgment do ultimately depend. From their
verdict there lies no appeal. By finding guilty or not guilty they do
complicately resolve both law and fact. As it hath been the law, so it hath
always been the custom and practice, of these juries, upon all general issues,
pleaded in cases, civil as well as criminal, to judge both of the law and fact.'
'Our ancestors were careful that all men of the like condition and quality,
presumed to be sensible of each other's infirmity, should mutually be judges of
each other's lives, and alternately taste of subjection and rule, every man
being equally liable to be accused or indicted, and perhaps to be suddenly
judged by the party, of whom he is at present judge, if he be found innocent.'

Lord Chief Justice Holt declared that 'in all cases and in all actions the jury
may give a general or special verdict, as well in causes criminal as civil, and
the court ought to receive it, if pertinent to the point in issue; for if the
jury doubt they may refer themselves to the court, but are not bound so to do.'
Anon. (1697) 3 Salk. 373. And upon the trial of an information for a seditious
libel, while he expressed his opinion that the paper was upon its face a
criminal libel, he submitted the question whether it was such to the jury,
saying: 'Now you are to consider whether these words I have read to you do not
tend to beget an ill opinion of the administration of the government.' Tutchin's
Case (1704) 14 How. State Tr. 1095, 1128. Although he concluded his charge with
the words, 'If you are satisfied that he is guilty of composing and publishing
these papers at London, you are to find him guilty,' yet, as Mr. Starkie well
observes, 'these words have immediate reference to the ground of defense upon
which Mr. Tutchin's counsel meant to rely, namely, that the offense had not been
proved to have been committed in London; and cannot be considered as used for
the purpose of withdrawing the attention of the jury from the quality of the
publication, upon which they had just before received instructions; and, indeed,
to suppose it had so meant would prove too much, since, if so, the jury were
directed not to find the truth of the innuendoes.' Starkie, Sland. & L. 56.

Some decisions, often cited as against the right of the jury by a general
verdict to determine matter of law involved in the general issue of guilty or
not guilty, were upon special verdicts presenting pure questions of law. Such
were Townsend's Case (1554) 1 Plow. 111, and Rex v. Oneby (1726) 2 Ld. Raym.
1485; 2 Strange, 766; 1 Barnard, 17; 17 How. State Tr. 29.

After the accession of George II., Lord Chief Justice Raymond, on trials at nisi
prius for seditious libels (ignoring the Cases of Tutchin and of the Seven
Bishops), told juries that they were bound to take the law from the court, and
that the question whether the paper which the defendant was accused of writing
and publishing was a libel was a mere question of law, with which the jury had
nothing to do. Clarke's Case (1729) 17 How. State Tr. 667, note, 1 Barnard, 304;
Francklin's Case (1731) 17 How. State Tr. 625, 672.

In 1734, upon an information in the nature of a quo warranto against the
defendant to show cause by what authority he acted as mayor of Liverpool, his
motion for a new trial, because the jury had found a general verdict for the
crown against the instructions of the judge, and notwithstanding he ordered them
to return a special verdict, was granted by the court of king's bench, Lord
Chief Justice Hardwicks saying: 'The general rule is that if the judge of nisi
prius directs the jury on the point of law, and they think fit obstinately to
find a verdict contrary to his direction, that is sufficient ground for granting
a new trial; and when the judge upon a doubt of law directs the jury to bring in
the matter specially, and they find a general verdict, that also is a sufficient
foundation for a new trial.' 'The thing that governs greatly in this
determination is that the point of law is not to be determined by juries; juries
have a power by law to determine matters of fact only; and it is of the greatest
consequence to the law of England and to the subject that these powers of the
judge and jury are kept distinct; that the judge determines the law, and the
jury the fact; and, if ever they come to be confounded, it will prove the
confusion and destruction of the law of England.' Rex v. Poole, Cas. t. Hardw.
23, 26, 28, Cunn. 11, 14, 16.

But such an information to try title to a civil office (though it had some of
the forms of a criminal prosecution) was brought for the mere purpose of trying
a civil right, and was considered as in the nature of a civil proceeding. 3 Bl.
Comm. 263; Rex v. Francis, 2 Term R. 484; Ames v. Kansas, 111 U.S. 449, 460, 461
S., 4 Sup. Ct. 437. And, as appears by the first passage above cited from Lord
Hardwicke's opinion, it was evidently so treated by the court, under the
practice of granting new trials on motion of either party to a civil case, which
had gradually grown up within the century preceding, as a substitute for
attaints. Bell v. Wardell (1740) Willes, 204, 206; Witham v. Lewis (1744) 1
Wils. 48, 55; Bright v. Eynon (1757) 1 Burrows, 390, 394. In a criminal case,
certainly, the court could not compel the jury to return a special verdict,
Nothing, therefore, was adjudged in Poole's Case as to the right of the jury to
decide the law in prosecutions for crime. And it is significant that, although
both reports of that case were published in 1770, it was not cited by Lord
Mansfield, in 1784, when collecting the authorities against the right of the
jury in criminal cases. King v. Shipley, 4 Doug. 73, 168.

Lord Hardwicke's own opinion, indeed, may be presumed to have been against the
right of the jury; for when attorney general he had so argued in Francklin's
Case, 17 How. State Tr. 669; and he was, as justly observed by Mr. Hallam, 'a
regularly bred crown lawyer, and in his whole life disposed to hold very high
the authority of government.' 3 Hall. Hist. (9th Ed.) 287. His opinion,
therefore, is of less weight upon a constitutional question affecting the
liberty of the subject than upon other questions of law or of equity.

The later history of the law of England upon the right of the jury to decide the
law in criminal cases is illustrated by a long conflict between the views of Mr.
Murray, afterwards Lord Mansfield, against the right, and of Mr. Pratt,
afterwards Lord Camden, in its favor, which, after the public sentiment had been
aroused by the great argument of Mr. Erskine in Dean of St. Asaph's Case, was
finally settled, in accordance with Lord Camden's view, by a declaratory act of
parliament.

Upon the trial of Owen, in 1752, for publishing a libel Mr. Murray, as solicitor
general, argued to the jury that if they determined the question of fact of
publication, the judge determined the law. But Mr. Pratt, of counsel for the
defendant, argued the whole matter to the jury; and, although the publication
was fully proved, and Chief Justice Lee told the jury that, this being so, they
could not avoid bringing in the defendant guilty, they returned and persisted in
a general verdict of acquittal. 18 How. State Tr. 1203, 1223, 1227, 1228; 29
Parl. Hist. 1408

In the like Case of Nutt, in 1728, 1 Barnard, 306 (Starkie, Sland. & L. 615),
conducted by Mr. Murray as attorney general, the like direction was given to the
jury by Chief Justice Ryder. Lord Mansfield, in Rex v. Shipley, 4 Doug, 168.

In the similar Case of Shebbeare, in 1758 (Starkie, Sland. & L. 56, 616), Mr.
Pratt, as attorney general, when moving before Lord Mansfield for leave to file
the information, said: 'It is merely to put the matter in a way of trial; for I
admit, and his lordship well knows, that the jury are judges of the law as well
as the fact, and have an undoubted right to consider whether, upon the whole,
the pamphlet in question be or be not published with a wicked, seditious intent,
and be or not a false, malicious, and scandalous libel.' Second postscript to
Letter to Mr. Almon on Libels (1770) p. 7; 4 Collection of Tracts (1763-1770) p.
162. And at the trial, as he afterwards said in the house of lords, he 'went
into court predetermined to insist on the jury taking the whole of the libel
into consideration,' and 'so little did he attend to the authority of the judges
on that subject that he turned his back on them, and directed all he had to say
to the jury.' 29 Parl. Hist. 1408. And see 20 How. State Tr. 709. But Lord
Mansfield instructed the jury that the question whether the publication was a
libel was to be determined by the court. 4 Doug. 169.

Lord Camden, when chief justice of the common pleas, presiding at criminal
trials, instructed the jury that they were judges of the law as well as the
fact. Pett. Jur. (1769) cited in 21 How. State Tr. 853; 29 Parl. Hist. 1404,
1408.

In the prosecutions, in the summer of 1770, of Miller and Woodfall for
publishing the letter of Junius to the king, Lord Mansfield instructed the jury
in the same way as in Shebbeare's Case. In Miller's Case the jury returned a
verdict of not guilty. In Woodfall's Case the jury returned a verdict of 'guilty
of printing and publishing only'; and the court therefore granted a motion for a
new trial. But Lord Mansfield, on November 20, 1770, in delivering judgment upon
that motion, took occasion to say that the court was of opinion 'that the
direction is right and according to law.' Miller's Case, 20 How. State Tr. 869,
893, 895; Woodfall's Case, Id. 895, 901-903, 918, 920, 5 Burrows, 2661, 2666,
2668.

On December 5, 1770, in the house of lords, the judgment in Woodfall's Case was
attacked by Lord Chatham, and defended by Lord Mansfield, in replying to whom
Lord Chatham said: 'This, my lords. I never understood to be the law of England,
but the contrary. I always understood that the jury were competent judges of the
law as well as the fact; and, indeed, if they were not, I can see no essential
benefit from their institution to the community.' And Lord Camden, after
observing that it would be highly necessary to have an authentic statement of
the direction to the jury in that case laid before the house, said: 'If we can
obtain this direction, and obtain it fully stated, I shall very readily deliver
may opinion upon the doctrines it inculcates, and, if they appear to me contrary
to the known and the established principles of the constitution, I shall not
scruple to tell the author of his mistake in the open face of this assembly.' 16
Parl. Hist. 1302-1307.

On the next day, a warm debate took place in the house of commons upon a motion
by Serjeant Glynn for a committee 'to inquire into the administration of
criminal justice, and the proceedings of the judges in Westminster Hall,
particularly in cases relating to the liberty of the press and the
constitutional power and duty of juries,' in the course of which Mr. Dunning,
then the leader of the bar, and afterwards Lord Ashburton, emphatically denied
that the doctrine of Lord Raymond and Lord Mansfield was the established law of
the land. 16 Parl. Hist. 1212, 1276. See, also, 2 Cavendish's Debates, 141, 369.
Pursuant to a wish expressed by Lord Mansfield on the day after, the house of
lords met on December 10th, when he informed the house that he had left with its
clerk a copy of the judgment of the court in Woodfall's Case. Lord Camden
thereupon said that he considered the paper as a challenge directed personally
to him, which he accepted, and said: 'In direct contradiction to him, I maintain
that his doctrine is not the law of England. I am ready to enter into debate
whenever the noble lord will fix a day for it.' And he proposed questions in
writing to Lord Mansfield, framed with the view of ascertaining how far that
judgment denied the right of the jury, by a general verdict in a criminal case,
to determine the law as well as the fact. Lord Mansfield evaded answering the
questions, and, while declaring himself ready to discuss them at some future
day, declined to name one. And the matter dropped for the time. 16 Parl. Hist.
1312-1322.

In 1783, after the independence of the United States had been recognized by
Great Britain, came the case of King v. Shipley, commonly known as Dean of St.
Asaph's Case, fully reported in 4 Doug. 73, and in 21 How. State Tr. 847, and
briefly stated in 3 Term R. 428, note, which was a criminal prosecution for a
seditious libel contained in a pamphlet written by Sir William Jones. Mr.
Justice Buller, at the trial, told the jury that the only questions for them
were whether the defendant published the pamphlet, and whether the innuendoes in
the indictment were true; and that the question of libel or no libel was a
question of law for the court, and not for the jury, upon which he declined to
express any opinion, but that it would be open for the consideration of the
court upon a motion in arrest of judgment. The jury returned a verdict of
'guilty of publishing only,' but were persuaded by the judge to put it in this
form: 'Guilty of publishing, but whether a libel or not the jury do not find.' 4
Doug. 81, 82, 85, 86; 21 How. State Tr. 946, 950-955. The effect of all this was
that the defendant was found guilty of publishing a paper, which neither the
judge nor the jury had held to be a libel; and judgment was ultimately arrested
upon the ground that, as set out in the indictment, it was not libelous. Id.
1044.

But, before the motion in arrest of judgment was argued, Mr. Erskine obtained a
rule to show cause why a new trial should not be granted, principally upon the
ground that the judge told the jury that the question whether libel or not was
not for their decision; whereas the jury, upon the general issue, had not only
the power, but the right, to decide the law. It was upon this rule that Mr.
Erskine made his famous argument in support of the rights of juries, and that
Lord Mansfield delivered the judgment, in which Mr. Justice Ashurst concurred,
which has since been the principal reliance of those who deny the right of the
jury to decide the law involved in the general issue in a criminal case.

It should not be overlooked that, at the hearing of this motion, Mr. Bearcroft,
the leading counsel for the crown, said he 'agreed with the counsel for the
defendant that it is the right of the jury, if they please, on the plea of not
guilty, to take upon themselves the decision of every question of law necessary
to the acquittal of the defendant; and, Lord Mansfield observing that he should
call it the 'power,' not the 'right,' he adhered to the latter expression; and
added that he though it an important privilege, and which, on particular
occasions, - as, for instance, if a proper censure of the measures of the
servants of the crown were to be construed by a judge to be libelous, - it would
be laudable and justifiable in them to exercise.' 4 Doug. 94, note. See, also,
page 108.

Mr. Justice Willes, dissenting from the opinion of the court, said he was sure
that these statements of Mr. Bearcroft expressed 'the sentiments of the greater
part of Westminster Hall,' and declared: 'I conceive it to be the law of this
country that the jury, upon a plea of not guilty, or upon the general issue,
upon an indictment or an information for a libel, have a constitutional right,
if they think fit, to examine the innocence or criminality of the paper,
notwithstanding there is sufficient proof given of the publication.' 'I believe
no man will venture to say they have not the power, but I mean expressly to say
they have the right. Where a civil power of this sort has been exercised without
control, it presumes - nay, by continual usage, it gives - the right. It was the
right which juries exercised in those times of violence when the Seven Bishops
were tried, and which even the partial judges who then presided did not dispute,
but authorized them to exercise upon the subject-matter of the libel; and the
jury, by their solemn verdict upon that occasion, became one of the happy
instruments, under Providence, of the salvation of this country. This privilege
has been assumed by the jury in a variety of ancient and modern instances, and
particularly in the case of Rex v. Owen, without any correction or even
reprimand of the court. It is a right, for the most cogent reasons, lodged in
the jury, as without this restraint the subject in bad times would have no
security for his life, liberty, or property.' And he concurred in refusing a new
trial, solely because, in his opinion, neither the counsel for the prosecution,
nor the judge presiding at the trial, had impugned these doctrines, and the
verdict returned by the jury was in the nature of a special verdict, in effect
submitting the law to the court. 4 Doug. 171-175.

In 1789, in Rex v. Withers, 3 Term R. 428, Lord Kenyon instructed a jury in the
same way that Mr. Justice Buller had done in Dean of St. Asaph's Case.

In 1791, the declaratory statute, entitled 'An act to remove doubts respecting
the functions of juries in cases of libel,' and known as 'Fox's Libel Act,' was
introduced in parliament, and was passed in 1792. St. 32 Geo. III. c. 60.

By that act, 'the legislature,' as lately observed by Lord Blackburn in the
house of lords, 'adopted almost the words and quite the substance' of that
passage of the opinion of Mr. Justice Willes first above quoted. Bank v. Henty,
L. R. 7 App. Cas. 741, 775.

The doubts which the act was passed to remove were, as recited at the beginning
of the act, upon the question whether upon the trial of an indictment or
information for libel, on the plea of not guilty, 'it be competent to the jury
impaneled to try the same to give their verdict upon the whole matter put in
issue'; and it was 'therefore declared and enacted [not merely enacted, but
declared to be the law as already existing] that on every such trial the jury
sworn to try the issue may give a general verdict of guilty or not guilty upon
the whole matter put in issue upon such indictment or information; and shall not
be required or directed, by the court or judge before whom such indictment or
information shall be tried, to find the defendant or defendants guilty, merely
on the proof of the publication by such defendant or defendants of the paper
charged to be a libel, and of the sense ascribed to the same in such indictment
or information.'

The act then provides - First, that the presiding judge may, at his discretion,
give instructions to the jury; second, that the jury may, at their discretion,
return a special verdict; and, third, that the defendant, if found guilty, may
move in arrest of judgment. The first of these provisos, and the only one
requiring particular notice, is that the judge shall, at his discretion, give
'his opinion and directions to the jury on the matter at issue,' 'in like manner
as in other criminal cases.' His 'opinion and directions' clearly means by way
of advice and instruction only, and not by way of order or command; and the
explanation, 'in like manner as in other criminal cases,' shows that no
particular rule was intended to be laid down in the case of libel. And that this
was the understanding at the time is apparent from the debate on the proviso,
which was adopted on the motion of Sir John Scott (then solicitor general, and
afterwards Lord Eldon) just before the bill passed the house of commons in 1791.
29 Parl. Hist. 594-602.

The clear effect of the whole act is to declare that the jury (after receiving
the instructions of the judge, if he sees fit to give any instructions) may
decide, by a general verdict, 'the whole matter put in issue, ' which
necessarily includes all questions of law, as well as of fact, involved in the
general issue of guilty or not guilty, and to recognize the same rule as
existing in all criminal cases.

Not only is this the clear meaning of the words of the act, but that such was
its intent and effect is shown by the grounds taken by supporters and its
opponents in parliament, as well as by subsequent judicial opinions in England.
Mr. Fox, upon moving the introduction of the bill in the house of commons in
1791, after observing that he was not ignorant that 'power' and 'right' were not
convertible terms, said that, 'if a power was vested in any person, it was
surely meant to be exercised'; that 'there was a power vested in the jury to
judge the law and fact, as often as they were united, and, if the jury were not
to be understood to have a right to exercise that power, the constitution would
never have intrusted them with it'; 'but they knew it was the province of the
jury to judge of law and fact, and this was the case, not of murder only, but of
felony, high and of every other criminal indictment'; and that 'it must be left
in all cases to a jury to infer the guilt of men, and an English subject could
not lose his life but by a judgment of his peers.' 29 Parl. Hist. 564, 565, 597.
And Mr. Pitt, in supporting the bill, declared that his own opinion was against
the practice of the judges, 'and that he saw no reason why, in the trial of a
libel, the whole consideration of the case might not go precisely to the
unfettered judgment of twelve men, sworn to give their verdict honestly and
conscientiously, as it did in matters of felony and other crimes of a high
nature.' 29 Parl. Hist. 588.

======================================================================
Disclaimer: Information shared in the Stanley Scoop is not necessarily
the opinion of the editor or staff.  It is shared for information
purposes only and it is recommended that you come to your own conclusions.
======================================================================
Live Free or Die! Liberty in our Lifetime!
We the People Scoop
http://www.stanley2002.org
http://www.wtpconstitutionalactivism.org
Reply to: rick@...

Also check out The Revolutionary Coalition!
This group is working to unite all third parties that defend the
constitution, independents, and non-voters (making up 60% of
Americans) into one SUPER THIRD PARTY!

On Yahoo groups at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TheRevolutionaryCoalition

This group has a single line platform: "To defend our (Natural)
God-given, unalienable, Constitutionally protected and guaranteed
rights."

Subscribe by sending email to:
therevolutionarycoalition-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

To subscribe to the We the People Constitutional Activism Scoop,
send a message to subscribe@...

If you wish to unsubscribe from We the People Constitutional Activism Scoop,
send a message to unsubscribe@...

All other changes for personal attention, such as changing your email address,
send to
webmaster@...

Be aware that you may be receiving mail forwarded from a group,
in which case you may have to visit http://groups.yahoo.com to unsubscribe.
Please also note that mail sent to our "reply to:" address,
newsletter@... is usually ignored....




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Rick Stanley
Constitutional Activist
E-mail: rick@...


We the People Scoop 3/10/07

========================================================================
WE THE PEOPLE SCOOP - TO EXPOSE!
**  Visit the website: http://www.stanley2002.org
**  OR Our NEW Offshore Site at http://www.wtpconstitutionalactivism.org
**  Like the Scoop? Forward it to everyone you know!
========================================================================


OPINION RELEASE:   Should President Bush Be Impeached? by Chuck Baldwin, March
9, 2007



----- Original Message -----
From: "Chuck Baldwin" <chuck@...>
To: <rick@...>
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 9:31 AM
Subject: Should President Bush Be Impeached? by Chuck Baldwin, March 9, 2007


> Should President Bush Be Impeached?
> By Chuck Baldwin
> March 9, 2007
>
>
> This column is archived at
> http://chuckbaldwinlive.com/c2007/cbarchive_20070309.html
>
>
> There have been calls for the impeachment of President Bush from certain
> left-wing groups for years. For the most part, those calls have been
> correctly ignored. Some of the "Impeach Bush" crowd are still stinging from
> Bill Clinton's impeachment and yearn to see a Republican president
> impeached. Others have major policy differences with the President, and some
> are still angry at the possibility that Bush was prematurely granted the
> presidency by the Supreme Court in that "photo-finish" race with Al Gore.
>
> However, a sitting president must never be the target of impeachment
> proceedings because certain groups disagree with his policies. Neither can
> we allow impeachment to be used as a means to overturn an election. And by
> all means, we must never allow impeachment to be used for purposes of
> enacting political revenge. The U.S. Constitution rightly makes the
> impeachment process a difficult and arduous one reserved strictly for
> "Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors." (Article. II.
> Section. 4.)
>
> When considering impeachment, the American people, and their representatives
> in Congress, must answer one question: Does the conduct, or misconduct, of a
> sitting president meet constitutional criteria? Specifically, is President
> Bush guilty of treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors? The
> guilty verdict of Vice President Dick Cheney's Chief of Staff Lewis
> "Scooter" Libby begs for answers to that question.
>
> As most of us know, Libby was convicted on four counts of perjury and
> obstruction of justice. But as one juror put it, Libby was the White House's
> "fall guy."
>
> Remember, Libby was the ultimate White House insider. He was the Chief of
> Staff to Vice President Dick Cheney, assistant to the Vice President for
> national security affairs, and an assistant to President George W. Bush. Now
> it appears that Libby has taken the fall for his two bosses. But just what
> does that mean?
>
> For one thing, it means that the jurors, while judging him guilty of the
> crimes with which he was charged, saw his higher-ups as equally or more
> culpable. One juror, Denis Collins, asked, "What is he [Libby] doing here?
> Where's [Karl] Rove? Where are these other guys?" Several jurors publicly
> questioned why Vice President Cheney or President Bush were not in the
> courtroom.
>
> At issue is whether President Bush and Vice President Cheney deliberately
> manipulated evidence regarding Iraq's Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) and
> whether they deliberately lied to and deceived the American people and
> Congress in order to invade Iraq.
>
> Of course, all this was brought to light when the White House made the
> decision to "out" CIA operative Valerie Plame after her husband, Ambassador
> Joe Wilson, publicly suggested that Bush and Cheney had lied and manipulated
> evidence in order to launch the Iraq invasion. To date, no one has been
> charged with leaking Plame's identity, but the Libby trial has clearly
> implicated Bush and Cheney in the whole affair. The jurors seemed convinced
> of that much, that is for sure.
>
> It has been reported that George W. Bush began planning an invasion of Iraq
> almost immediately after being elected president in 2000, which was long
> before the 9/11 attacks. Furthermore, President Bush has since acknowledged
> that Iraq had nothing to do with the 9/11 attacks and that it had no WMD
> capable of threatening the United States. However, he has constantly blamed
> "bad intelligence" for the decision to launch the preemptive invasion of
> Iraq.
>
> The American people and history may forgive a leader for an erroneous
> decision predicated upon bad intelligence. However, neither the American
> people nor history will forgive a leader for deliberately manipulating
> evidence and lying to Congress in order to satisfy a personal bloodlust.
>
> Therefore, Congress should immediately commission an independent counsel to
> investigate whether President Bush and Vice President Cheney did indeed
> manipulate evidence and deliberately lie to the American people. If that
> investigation proves that President Bush acted in good faith and with no
> ulterior motives, his decision to invade Iraq will go down in history as a
> colossal lapse in judgment. If, on the other hand, the investigation proves
> that he manipulated evidence and lied to the American people, his actions
> most definitely rise to the constitutional standard for impeachment. We need
> a thorough investigation to find the truth.
>
> (c) Chuck Baldwin
>
> NOTE TO THE READER:
>
> This email editorial cannot be considered Spam as long as the sender
> includes contact information and a method of removal. To be removed, see
> instructions below.
>
> To subscribe to these columns, click on this link and follow the
> instructions: http://00799fb.netsolhost.com/cwsubx.html
>
> To unsubscribe, click on this link and follow the instructions:
> http://00799fb.netsolhost.com/cwunsubx.html
>
> Chuck Baldwin's commentaries are copyrighted and may be republished,
> reposted, or emailed providing the person or organization doing so does not
> charge for subscriptions or advertising and that the column is copied intact
> and that full credit is given and that Chuck's web site address is included.
>
> Editors or Publishers of publications charging for subscriptions or
> advertising who want to run these columns must contact Chuck Baldwin for
> permission. Radio or television Talk Show Hosts interested in scheduling an
> interview with Chuck should contact chuck@....
>
> When responding, please include your name, city and state. And, unless
> otherwise requested, all respondents will be added to the Chuck Wagon
> address list.
>
> Please visit Chuck's web site at http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com.
  >

======================================================================
Disclaimer: Information shared in the Stanley Scoop is not necessarily
the opinion of the editor or staff.  It is shared for information
purposes only and it is recommended that you come to your own conclusions.
======================================================================
Live Free or Die! Liberty in our Lifetime!
We the People Scoop
http://www.stanley2002.org
http://www.wtpconstitutionalactivism.org
Reply to: rick@...

Also check out The Revolutionary Coalition!
This group is working to unite all third parties that defend the
constitution, independents, and non-voters (making up 60% of
Americans) into one SUPER THIRD PARTY!

On Yahoo groups at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TheRevolutionaryCoalition

This group has a single line platform: "To defend our (Natural)
God-given, unalienable, Constitutionally protected and guaranteed
rights."

Subscribe by sending email to:
therevolutionarycoalition-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

To subscribe to the We the People Constitutional Activism Scoop,
send a message to subscribe@...

If you wish to unsubscribe from We the People Constitutional Activism Scoop,
send a message to unsubscribe@...

All other changes for personal attention, such as changing your email address,
send to
webmaster@...

Be aware that you may be receiving mail forwarded from a group,
in which case you may have to visit http://groups.yahoo.com to unsubscribe.
Please also note that mail sent to our "reply to:" address,
newsletter@... is usually ignored....




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Rick Stanley
Constitutional Activist
E-mail: rick@...


We the People Scoop 3/09/07

========================================================================
WE THE PEOPLE SCOOP - TO EXPOSE!
**  Visit the website: http://www.stanley2002.org
**  OR Our NEW Offshore Site at http://www.wtpconstitutionalactivism.org
**  Like the Scoop? Forward it to everyone you know!
========================================================================


OPINION RELEASE:   Big Brother and the Mark of the Beast



----- Original Message -----
From: "D. Reid" <deborahgailreid@...>
To: "We The People Constitutional Activism" <rick@...>
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 3:47 PM
Subject: Big Brother and the Mark of the Beast


>  Dear Rick,
>
>  The article below that shows the history about these matters would be good
> for a news or opinion release. I wonder if there will be some methods, for
> example bartering, set up for people to survive without having to take the
> "Mark of the Beast"?
>
>  Sincerely,
>  Deborah Reid
>  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wisepeople
>
>  * Big Brother and The Mark Of The Beast*
>
>  Mar 07, 2007 8:35 AM
>
> *From Biometric Scanning to Microchips and the Mark of the Beast?*
>  Or How We Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Coming of Antichrist
>  By Thomas Horn
>
>  Today I learned that Madras High School in the little town of Madras, Oregon
> is the latest government institution to allow students to pay for their lunch
> with the swipe of a hand.
>  Only yesterday in a related event, Chief of Police Jack Schmidig of Bergen
> County, NJ, a member of the police force for over 30 years, received a
> VeriChip as part of Applied Digital Solution's strategy of enlisting key
> regional leaders to accelerate adoption of its implantable product.
>
>  Kevin H. McLaughlin, VeriChip Corporation's CEO said of the event that
> "High-profile regional leaders are accepting the VeriChip, representing an
> excellent example of our approach to gaining adoption of the technology."
>
>  The new and aggressive indoctrination program - Thought and Opinion Leaders
> to Play Key Role in Adoption of VeriChip - is intended to create widespread
> acceptance and exponential adaptation of the company's FDA-cleared,
> human-implantable RFID tag.
>
>  Earlier this year ADS provided testimony that safeguards have been
> implemented to ensure privacy in connection with implantable microchips. ADS
> received patent rights to Digital Angel (TM) technology on December 10, 1999.
> What set Digital Angel apart from the competition was the innovative design--a
> miniature digital transceiver specifically created
> for human implantation.
>
>  According to information released last year the implantable transceiver
> "sends and receives data and can be continuously tracked by GPS (Global
> Positioning Satellite) technology. The transceiver's power supply and
> actuation system are unlike anything ever created. When implanted within a
> body, the device is powered electromechanically through the movement of
> muscles, and it can be activated either by the 'wearer' or by the monitoring
> facility."
>
>  An Information Technology report recently verified plans to study implantable
> chips as a method of tracking terrorists. After first pulling back from the
> implantable version of its Digital Angel, ADS foresees a unique use of its
> product under the new name VeriChip in the wake of terrorist attacks in New
> York and Washington.
>
>  "We've changed out thinking since September 11," a company spokesman said,
> "Now there's more of a need to monitor evil activities."
>
>  ADS also claims the VeriChip (Digital Angel) has a variety of other uses,
> such as "providing a tamper-proof means of identification for enhanced
> e-business security, animal tracking, locating lost or missing individuals,
> tracking the location of valuable property and monitoring
> the medical conditions of at-risk patients."
>
>  Following the Internet World Wireless 2001 award for "Best of Show: Client
> Services," Mercedes Walton, President and COO of Applied Digital Solutions,
> said: ``We have always had high expectations for the Digital Angel products.
> This award is truly a validation of our faith in Digital Angel's ability to
> capture the imagination of the public. Consumer anticipation has translated
> into accelerated interest from potential partners and allies. We are eager to
> bring Digital Angel to the marketplace in a very timely manner...."
>
>  To further advocate Digital Angel technology, Applied Digital Solutions
> launched a website http://www.digitalangel.net where viewers can peruse
> diagrams and read summary information.
>
>  Other manufacturers of sub-skin implants have quietly field-tested similar
> devices over the past few years. The London Times reported in October 1998,
> "Film stars and the children of millionaires are among 45 people, including
> several Britons, who have been fitted with the chips (called the Sky Eye) in
> secret tests."
>
>  Due to civil liberty and privacy issues, the ACLU announced opposition to
> mandatory microchip implantation when applied to humans. The ACLU is certain
> to be a strange bedfellow of Christians and conservatives concerning this
> issue.
>  THE FULFILLMENT OF PROPHECY?
>  Many Christians believe that, before long, an antichrist system will appear.
> It will be a New World Order, under which national boundaries dissolve, and
> ethnic groups, ideologies, religions, and economics from around the world,
> orchestrate a single and dominant sovereignty. The system will supposedly be
> free of religious and political extremes, and
> membership will tolerate the philosophical and cultural differences of its
> constituents. Except for minor nonconformities, war, terrorism, and hunger
> will be a thing of the past.
>  According to popular Biblical interpretation, a single personality will
> surface at the head of the utopian administration. He will appear as a man of
> distinguished character, but will ultimately become "a king of fierce
> countenance" (Dan. 8:23).
>
>  With imperious decree the Antichrist will facilitate the one-world
> government, universal religion, and globally monitored socialism. Those who
> refuse his New World Order will inevitably be imprisoned or destroyed, until
> at last he exalts himself "above all that is called
> God, or that is worshiped, so that he, as God, sitteth in the temple of God,
> showing himself that he is God" (2 Thess. 2:4).
>
>  The Antichrist's widespread power will be derived at the expense of
> individual human liberties. He will force "all, both small and great, rich and
> poor, free and bond to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their
> foreheads: And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or
> the name of the beast, or the number of his name. Here is wisdom. Let him that
> hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a
> man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six [666]" (Rev. 13:16-18).
>
>  For many years the idea that humans could somehow succumb to little more than
> branded cattle, and that rugged individualism would thereafter be sacrificed
> for an anesthetized universal harmony, was repudiated by America's greatest
> minds.
>
>  Then, in the 1970's, things began to change. Following a call by Nelson
> Rockefeller for the creation of a "New World Order," presidential candidate
> Jimmy Carter campaigned, saying, "We must replace balance of power politics
> with world order politics."
>
>    During the 1980's President George Bush continued the one-world dirge,
> announcing over national television that "a New World Order" had arrived.
> Following the initial broadcast, President Bush addressed the Congress,
> saying, "What is at stake is more than one small country [Kuwait], it is a big
> idea--a new world order, where diverse nations are drawn together in common
> cause to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind: peace and security,
> freedom, and the rule of law. Such is a world worthy of our struggle, and
> worthy of our children's future!"
>
>  Ever since the President's astonishing newscast, a parade of political and
> religious leaders have discharged a profusion of rhetoric aimed at
> implementing the goals of a New World Order. Developers of biometric implant
> chips employ similar language in announcing compatible global technologies,
> and many Americans consider electronically marking humans or implanting a
> series of digital equations beneath the skin to be the natural progress of
> advancing and necessary technologies.
>
>  IT SHOULD COME AS NO SURPRISE
>  Some people believe implantable microchips will be the Biblical Mark of the
> Beast. These claim that acts of terrorism such as the ones in New York and
> Washington, encourage microchipping humans for identification purposes.
>
>  But even before the New York and Pentagon tragedies, a push was being made to
> brand and monitor humanity.
>
>  Consider the following:
>  * As far back as 1973, Senior Scholastics introduced school age children to
> the concept of buying and selling using numbers inserted in their forehead. In
> the September 20, 1973 feature "Who Is Watching You?" the secular high school
> journal speculated: "All buying and selling in the program will be done by
> computer. No currency, no change, no checks. In
> the program, people would receive a number that had been assigned them
> tattooed in their wrist or forehead. The number is put on by laser beam and
> cannot be felt. The number in the body is not seen with the naked eye and is
> as permanent as your fingerprints. All items of consumer goods will be marked
> with a computer mark. The computer outlet in the store which picks up the
> number on the items at the checkstand will also pick up the number in the
> person's body and automatically total the price and deduct the amount from the
> erson's 'Special Drawing Rights' account."
>
>  * In the 1974 article "The Specter of Eugenics," Charles Frankel pointed out
> Linus Pauling's (Nobel Prize winner) suggestions that a mark be tattooed on
> the foot or forehead of every young person. Pauling envisioned a mark denoting
> genotype.
>
>  * In 1980, U.S. News and World Report continued the warning, pointing out
> that the Federal Government was contemplating "National Identity Cards,"
> without which nobody could work or conduct business.
>
>  * The Denver Post Sun followed up in 1981, claiming that chip implants could
> someday replace I.D. cards. The June 21, 1981 story read in part, "The chip is
> placed in a needle which is affixed to a simple syringe containing an
> anti-bacterial solution. The needle is capped and ready to forever identify
> something--or somebody."
>
>  * The May 7, 1996 Chicago Tribune questioned the technology, wondering aloud
> if we could trust Big Brother under our skin?
>
>  * Then in 1997 applications for patents of subcutaneous implant devices for
> "a person or an animal" were applied for.
>
>  * On April 27, 1998, Time Magazine ran the story, The Big Bank Theory And
> What It Says About The Future OF Money, in which they opined "Your daughter
> can store the money any way she wants--on her laptop, on a debit card, even
> (in the not too distant future) on a chip implanted under her skin."
>
>  * In August 1998 the BBC covered the first known human microchip
> implantation.
>  * That same month the Sunday Oregonian warned that proposed medical
> identifiers might erode privacy rights by tracking individuals through
> alphanumeric health identifier technologies. The startling Oregonian feature
> depicted humans with barcodes in their foreheads.
>
>  * Senator Robb (Virginia) felt it necessary to add the MARC (multi-technology
> automated reader card) Card Amendment to the FY97 DOD Authorization Bill.
>
>  * One can only speculate why bionics is now attempting to create organisms
> that contain linked organic (human cells) material with biometric chips for
> human implantation.
>
>  * Recently millions of Today Show viewers watched an American family get
> "chipped" with ADS's VeriChipT live from a doctor's office in Boca Raton.
>
>  * VeriChip recently has been solicting interest from the US Military to
> implant all US Military forces with implantable "dogtag" VeriChips.
>
>  * Meanwhile, terrorism has many people in the mood these days to sacrifice
> human liberties... and Digital Angel has opened its mass production factory in
> Palm Beach, Florida.
>
>  WILL DIGITAL "MARKS" SOON BE MANDATORY?
>  Makers of implantable microchips claim the procedure will be voluntary. But a
> report written by Elaine M. Ramish for the Franklin Pierce Law Center says: "A
> [mandatory] national identification system via microchip implants could be
> achieved in two stages: Upon introduction as a voluntary system, the microchip
> implantation will appear to be palatable. After there is a familiarity with
> the procedure and a knowledge of its benefits, implantation would be
> mandatory."
>
>  George Getz, the communications director for the Libertarian Party agrees,
> saying: "After all, the government has never forced anyone to have a driver
> license, [but] try getting along without one, when everyone from your local
> banker to the car rental man to the hotel
> operator to the grocery store requires one in order for you to take advantage
> of their services, that amounts to a de facto mandate. If the government can
> force you to surrender your fingerprints to get a drivers license, why can't
> it force you to get a computer chip implant? "
>
>  People like Mr. Getz are correct. Conservatives and liberals alike need to
> contact state and federal representatives and demand laws preserving
> individual rights before Digital Angel and similar forces lead humanity down a
> high-tech path of no return.
>
>  In the same way Social Security numbers were voluntary before becoming
> defacto-mandatory, biometric chip implants will be compulsory in the future
> unless citizens rise up in immediate and national opposition. Even Applied
> Digital Solution's chief executive officer Richard Sullivan envisions a
> scenario where ``people [are] required to be chipped or
> [have] some combination of a device requiring them to be scanned and monitored
> at all times.''
>
>  Note what the prophet said!
>
> And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to
> receive a mark (charagma; [Greek charax] meaning to stake into or "stick
> into") in their right hand, or in their foreheads....Here is wisdom. Let him
> that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of
> a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six (Rev. 13:16-18) Did
> the prophet foresee a hypodermic needle injecting something beneath
> the skin? Sounds like it.
>
>  A temporary victory was won against such ideas following the original news
> story by Raiders News Update concerning ADS's implantable microchip intentions
> in 1999. News services across the web ran our story resulting in an inundation
> by concerned readers. ADS's shares droped on the Nasdaq from $5.00 to .50
> each. ADS then released this statement: "We are not pursuing any applications
> for embedded chips and we have moved away from that for a couple of
> reasons....There are a number of privacy concerns and religious
> implications -- fundamentalist Christian groups [Raiders News Update] regard
> it [implanting computer chips] as the Devil's work."
>
>  The reprieve didn't last long. The Palm Beach testing center's wristwatch
> version of Digital Angel was successful and ADS announced it would "start
> implanting them inside humans between the muscle and the skin on the forearm
> next year."
>
> Then on 9-11, terrorism came along, the perfect incentive for mandating
> everything from face scanning to implantable chips as not only inevitable, but
> perhaps simply a good idea.
>
>  These are differences in degree, not in kind, and forecast a prediction made
> long ago:
>  "And the third angel followed them, saying with a loud voice, If any man
> worship the beast and his image, and receive his mark in his forehead, or in
> his hand, The same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is
> poured out without mixture into the cup of his indignation; and he shall be
> tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels, and in
> the presence of the Lamb. And the smoke of their torment ascendeth up for ever
> and ever: and they have no rest day nor night, who worship the beast and his
> image, and whosoever receiveth the mark of his name" (Rev. 14:9-11).
>
>
>  Source:
>
>
http://groups.google.com/group/Bible-Prophecy-News/browse_thread/thread/2f639b1e\
4beed432/1ea46ca31bcf1e22#1ea46ca31bcf1e22

======================================================================
Disclaimer: Information shared in the Stanley Scoop is not necessarily
the opinion of the editor or staff.  It is shared for information
purposes only and it is recommended that you come to your own conclusions.
======================================================================
Live Free or Die! Liberty in our Lifetime!
We the People Scoop
http://www.stanley2002.org
http://www.wtpconstitutionalactivism.org
Reply to: rick@...

Also check out The Revolutionary Coalition!
This group is working to unite all third parties that defend the
constitution, independents, and non-voters (making up 60% of
Americans) into one SUPER THIRD PARTY!

On Yahoo groups at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TheRevolutionaryCoalition

This group has a single line platform: "To defend our (Natural)
God-given, unalienable, Constitutionally protected and guaranteed
rights."

Subscribe by sending email to:
therevolutionarycoalition-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

To subscribe to the We the People Constitutional Activism Scoop,
send a message to subscribe@...

If you wish to unsubscribe from We the People Constitutional Activism Scoop,
send a message to unsubscribe@...

All other changes for personal attention, such as changing your email address,
send to
webmaster@...

Be aware that you may be receiving mail forwarded from a group,
in which case you may have to visit http://groups.yahoo.com to unsubscribe.
Please also note that mail sent to our "reply to:" address,
newsletter@... is usually ignored....




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Rick Stanley
Constitutional Activist
E-mail: rick@...


We the People Scoop 3/09/07

========================================================================
WE THE PEOPLE SCOOP - TO EXPOSE!
**  Visit the website: http://www.stanley2002.org
**  OR Our NEW Offshore Site at http://www.wtpconstitutionalactivism.org
**  Like the Scoop? Forward it to everyone you know!
========================================================================


  RELEASE:   Bill Forbids FLA. Employer's Gun Sanctions of Employee Cars



Subject: Bill Forbids FLA. Employer's Gun Sanctions of Employee Cars


Revived guns in employee's cars bill pits NRA against some businesses in the
Gunshine State
   A controversial measure pitting the National Rifle Association against
Florida's business lobby was resurrected Monday, just 24 hours before the
opening of the Legislature's 2007 session.
    The NRA-backed bill (HB 1417) would make it illegal for businesses to prevent
their employees from keeping guns locked in their cars when they park at work.

    A similar measure divided the Republican-controlled Legislature a year ago,
drawing headlines across Florida.

    The language in this year's legislation is somewhat different.

    Dubbed the "Individual Personal Private Property Protection Act of 2007," it
would forbid an employer from stopping workers or customers from storing any
"lawfully possessed" product in their cars when they park on the employer's
property.

   The word firearm isn't mentioned until the fifth page of the eight-page bill.

    NRA lobbyist Marion Hammer was characteristically blunt when asked if the aim
of the bill was any different this year.

    "Nope," she said. "The intent is the same . . . to protect the rights of
law-abiding people to have firearms stored in their private vehicles in parking
lots."

    Florida business groups, who managed to muzzle the proposal in the
Legislature last spring, vowed they would fight it again.

    "We still have the same problems as we had last year," said Jennifer Krell
Davis, a spokeswoman for the Florida Chamber of Commerce. "We have existing
property rights that allow property owners to decide the terms of their
property."

    The measure is modeled after a law in Oklahoma, which was passed after a
dozen workers at a paper mill were fired when managers found guns in the
workers' vehicles parked on site, a violation of company policy.

    Several well-known companies, including oil giant ConocoPhillips, sued to
have that law overturned, prompting the NRA to urge its more than 4 million
members to boycott ConocoPhillips gas stations.

    The Florida proposal would grant only limited exceptions, such as to some
businesses involved in national defense, aerospace or domestic-security
activities or to those involved with combustible materials.

    Businesses that break the law could face fines of up to $10,000 per
violation, though they also would be granted immunity from lawsuits should
someone with a gun in the car use it on the property.

Jason Garcia can be reached at jrgarcia@... or 850-222-5564.

======================================================================
Disclaimer: Information shared in the Stanley Scoop is not necessarily
the opinion of the editor or staff.  It is shared for information
purposes only and it is recommended that you come to your own conclusions.
======================================================================
Live Free or Die! Liberty in our Lifetime!
We the People Scoop
http://www.stanley2002.org
http://www.wtpconstitutionalactivism.org
Reply to: rick@...

Also check out The Revolutionary Coalition!
This group is working to unite all third parties that defend the
constitution, independents, and non-voters (making up 60% of
Americans) into one SUPER THIRD PARTY!

On Yahoo groups at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TheRevolutionaryCoalition

This group has a single line platform: "To defend our (Natural)
God-given, unalienable, Constitutionally protected and guaranteed
rights."

Subscribe by sending email to:
therevolutionarycoalition-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

To subscribe to the We the People Constitutional Activism Scoop,
send a message to subscribe@...

If you wish to unsubscribe from We the People Constitutional Activism Scoop,
send a message to unsubscribe@...

All other changes for personal attention, such as changing your email address,
send to
webmaster@...

Be aware that you may be receiving mail forwarded from a group,
in which case you may have to visit http://groups.yahoo.com to unsubscribe.
Please also note that mail sent to our "reply to:" address,
newsletter@... is usually ignored....




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Graphic version of this and more also at
     http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TerryLiberty/


   NEWS Google: come home soldier


   Dems push for ’08 exit from Iraq, GOP balks
By Associated Press
Friday, March 9, 2007 - Updated: 02:09 AM EST

WASHINGTON - House Democrats unveiled a bill yesterday that would require the
withdrawal of U.S. combat troops from Iraq by fall 2008. The White House said
President Bush would veto it.

   MoreAt http://news.bostonherald.com/politics/view.bg?articleid=187384



   Antiwar Radio: Scott Horton
   DailyAt http://antiwar.com/blog/category/antiwar-radio




   LIVE UNSCREENED Call-in TV

   Phone 477.ACTV (1.512.4772288)
     March 11 Sunday 10pm Central Time


     on Time Warner Austin Cable TV 10
AND...   (Worldwide)
Peer 2 Peer: AustinLibertyInterNet Radio/TV*




       Sunday on 'Jeff Davis Show'
    http://hometown.aol.com/tfijdshow/



   NowAlsoOn www.YouTube.com
   Jeff Davis Show" videos on youtube
   http://youtube.com/profile?user=jeffdavisshow


   with Terry Liberty Parker of  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian




   Crank up yer webcam as we experiment with YOUR face LIVE on TV


     Look for me (especially Sunday eves) as:

   TxLiberty on Yahoo Messenger & MSN Messenger

   Terry Liberty Parker on Skype
   (supports multiple platforms like
   MAC & Linux along with Windows)

   and maybe AustinLiberty on AIM






   WindowsMedia Download Playback of THIS show soon after ending as
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/JD070311.wmv



     free FROM: AustinLibertyInterNet Radio/TV
at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LibertyProspects/links


   (Due to popular demand, the system is often too busy to respond; so try back
often.  Right click playbacks to 'save target as...' to download selections to
your computer for replay later at your convenience and as often as you want)









   Daily Show / Colbert Report: 2007.03.05
ABC Newsman, Bob Woodruff, who was badly injured in Iraq; THEN Ben & Jerry of
Ice Cream fame and politico Mara Vanderslice
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/DSClbRpt070305WoodruffBenJe\
rry.wmv




   Daily Show / Colbert Report: 2007.03.08
Author Sharon Moalem and Ted Koppel
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/DSClbRpt070308Koppel.wmv




   PBS Charlie Rose 2007.03.07
Montana's sorta 'libertarian' Governor Brian Schwietzer (D) then Part 1 of 2:
Author & ABC White House & Iraq Correspondent Martha Raddatz
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/PBSRose070307.wmv




   PBS Nova: Battle Plan Under Fire
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/ A report (produced with the New York Times) on how
military technology was tested during the U.S. invasion of Iraq and the
occupation that followed. Included: the National Geospatial-Intelligence
Agency's survey of Iraq; the Stryker Brigade, a lightly armored troop carrier
with sophisticated communication and GPS equipment; the Pentagon's Combating
Terrorism Technology Task Force; and Millennium Challenge 2002, a war-game
simulation of the invasion. (2004)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/PBSNovaBattlePlanUnderFire.\
wmv




NOTE: if any of these LoRez internet playbacks stimulate your interest in
getting a clearer copy, please 'Google' that selection to locate a legal source
if one is not otherwise given already.




   Syriana, making of
A look at "Syriana," a 2005 political thriller focusing on multiple levels of
the global oil industry. The film stars George Clooney, Matt Damon and Jeffrey
Wright, and was written and directed by Stephen Gaghan, who won a Best
Screenplay Oscar for "Traffic." (2005)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/MakingSyriana.wmv




   Syriana (Download ONLY)
A CIA agent, an energy analyst, a prince and an oil tycoon are among those
caught in a web of corruption and betrayal in this engrossing political
thriller. George Clooney, Matt Damon, Jeffrey Wright, Christopher Plummer, Chris
Cooper. Written and directed by Stephen Gaghan. Cast & Credits: George Clooney,
Matt Damon, Jeffrey Wright, Christopher Plummer, Chris Cooper (2005)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/SyrianaH.wmv




   PBS Charlie Rose 2007.01.19
Have you seen the movie, Battle of Algiers? Former US Scty of State, Henry
Kissinger, Alistair Horne (Author, Savage War of Peace) & others on today's
middle east conflicts
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/PBSRose070119.wmv


Battle of Algiers (Download ONLY)
Gillo Pontecorvo's prize-winning, semidocumentary re-creation of the Algerian
struggle to overthrow French colonialism, from 1954 to 1962. Mathieu: Jean
Martin. Kader: Yacef Saadi. Dubeis: Tommaso Neri. Ali: Brahim Haggiag. Halima:
Fawzia El Kader. Cast & Credits: Yacef Saadi, Jean Martin, Brahim Haggiag,
Tommaso Neri, Samia Kerbash (1965)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/BattleOfAlgiersH.wmv



Also See Much More In Folder:
*Featured in AustinLibertyInterNet Radio/TV
Some more recent additions, upgrades or items otherwise of special interest;
before they are re-distributed to other folders in this collection.
   AND the folder
  War & Peace
Initiating physical assault upon innocent persons is wrong




   MilitaryIndustrialComplex: Why We Fight
In a nationally televised 'farewell' address on January 17, 1961, only four days
before John F. Kennedy's inaugural, two term 1950s US Prez Dwight Eisenhower,
who was also a 4 star General and Supreme Commander of the Allied assault
against Hitler in WWII, warned of the dangers of 'undue influence' exerted by
the 'military-industrial complex' (he would know, afterall)
   MoreAt http://www.worldpolicy.org/journal/hartung01.html
   AddressTextAt http://www.eisenhower.utexas.edu/farewell.htm
   WikipediaAt http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military-industrial_complex
   FlashPlaybackAt
http://www.sonyclassics.com/whywefight/main.html




   NOTE: if any of these LoRez internet playbacks stimulate your interest in
getting a clearer copy, please 'Google' that selection to locate a legal source
if one is not otherwise given already.




   ABC Nightline: 2007.03.05
US troop ordeal in Iraq 'Black Sunday'
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/ABCntln070305IraqBlackSunda\
y.wmv




   Black Hawk Down (Download ONLY)
(Aprx 150mb to playback at aprx 200kbps)Ridley Scott brings us the intense
experience of brave American soldiers coping with Somali resistence to US
intervention. Harrowing account of the doomed 1993 American mission to capture
top aides of a Somali warlord. Eversmann: Josh Hartnett. Grimes: Ewan McGregor.
McKnight: Tom Sizemore. Hoot: Eric Bana. Sanderson: William Fichtner. (2001)
Sadly, I missed recording the first part; but there's plenty here anyway....
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/BlackHawkDownH.wmv




   Black Hawk Down (Hi-Speed Ver)
COMPLETE and with 'alternate ending' (Download ONLY; nearly 600mb to playback at
aprx 400kbps)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/BlackHawkDownVH.wmv




   Black Hawk Down True Story
History Channel: The 1993 Battle of Mogadishu (Somalia), in which 18 U.S.
soldiers died, is recalled in a documentary based on Mark Bowden's book "Black
Hawk Down."
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/BlackHawkDownTrueStory.wmv




   Jarhead (Download ONLY)
Serviceable soldier story following a third-generation marine (Jake Gyllenhaal)
from boot camp to his job as a sniper during the Gulf War. Jamie Foxx, Peter
Sarsgaard. Directed by Sam Mendes, from a script by William Broyles Jr., who
adapted the military memoir of real-life marine Anthony Swofford (played by
Gyllenhaal). Cast & Credits: Jake Gyllenhaal, Peter Sarsgaard, Lucas Black,
Chris Cooper, Jamie Foxx (2005)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/JarheadVH.wmv




   Marooned (Download ONLY)
Oscar-winning special effects enhance the tension as mission control races
against time and a hurricane to retrieve astronauts trapped in space. Gregory
Peck, Richard Crenna, David Janssen, James Franciscus, Lee Grant, Gene Hackman.
Teresa: Nancy Kovack. Betty: Mariette Hartley. Officer: Scott Brady. John
Sturges directed. Cast & Credits: Gregory Peck, Richard Crenna, David Janssen,
James Franciscus, Gene Hackman (1969)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/MaroonedH.wmv





   SarahSilverman: Batteries
The first season wraps up with Sarah embarking on a journey to procure batteries
for her television remote. Along the way, she accidentally soils her pants and
has a one-night stand with God. Cast & Credits: Sarah Silverman, Brian Posehn,
Steve Agee, Laura Silverman, Jay Johnston (2007.03.07)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/SarahSilvermanBatteries.wmv




   Madonna: The Confessions Tour---Live from London (Download ONLY)
Pop songstress Madonna performs a collection of her greatest hits and songs from
her 2005 CD "Confessions on a Dance Floor" in a concert taped at Wembley Stadium
in London during her Confessions Tour. (2006.11.22)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/MadonnaConfessionsLondonVH.\
wmv





       Also See Much More In Folder:
   *Featured in AustinLibertyInterNet Radio/TV
Some more recent additions, upgrades or items otherwise of special interest;
before they are re-distributed to other folders in this collection.

   AND in the folder....
    War & Peace
Initiating physical assault upon innocent persons is wrong


       free FROM: AustinLibertyInterNet Radio/TV
at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LibertyProspects/links


   (Due to popular demand, the system is often too busy to respond; so try back
often.  Right click playbacks to 'save target as...' to download selections to
your computer for replay later at your convenience and as often as you want)






                         * 'PeerCasting' continuously now as
'AustinLibertyInterNet'
via 'Yellow Pages' at www.PeerCast.org

Distributed networking like www.PeerCast.org may enable people to
create an alternative to govt licenced & controlled broadcasting.
That can be useful when promoting things that challenge, or may be
inconvenient to, established  authority :)
Please test this (at various times as needed) as an audience member
(or even another 'caster) and let me know of your experience(s).


   ExploreAt http://www.peercast.org/
get a very small self installing program
then select 'yellow pages'
to find 'AustinLibertyInterNet' webcasting
as an experiment by me in 'distributed networking'
then please let me know of your experience















     -Terry Liberty Parker
AND Find More Free On-demand Playbacks On-line via
AustinLibertyInterNet Radio/TV
at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LibertyProspects/links VoiceCall 1.512.462.1776

     every Sunday 7pm (central) to ?
I host informal discussion
to which all are welcome
who want to consider ideas & issues
of Liberty & Justice for ALL

   ON-LINE:

       Look for me (especially Sunday eves) as:

   TxLiberty on Yahoo Messenger




   PicAt http://www.wilsonsalmanac.com/images/byron_naked.jpg












---------------------------------
Sucker-punch spam with award-winning protection.
  Try the free Yahoo! Mail Beta.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Rick Stanley
Constitutional Activist
E-mail: rick@...


We the People Scoop 3/08/07

========================================================================
WE THE PEOPLE SCOOP - TO EXPOSE!
**  Visit the website: http://www.stanley2002.org
**  OR Our NEW Offshore Site at http://www.wtpconstitutionalactivism.org
**  Like the Scoop? Forward it to everyone you know!
========================================================================


OPINION RELEASE:  Closing argument



----- Original Message -----
From: "The Greek" <taxnomo@...>
Subject:   Closing argument


> Closing argument
>  Humor me.
>
> I've been studying the subject of the legality/illegality of income taxes for
> about 12 years now, and have learned a great deal of good information.
>
> It is not possible, in my view, to discredit many of the conclusions to which
> the evidence presented by Larken Rose, Irwin Schiff, and Tommy Cryer lead. But
> the evidence is complex and comprehensive and requires a thorough and in-depth
> examination before the logical conclusion can be reached and, even then, the
> conclusion is neither indelibly clear nor conspicuous nor self-evident to the
> "man-on-the-street." If presented to a jury, the evidence would do little more
> than confuse 99% of them, and the conclusions they would reach would be more
> influenced by their "everybody-knows" conventional wisdom than by the gravity
> of the facts presented to them.
>
> Here is an explanation I have used in private conversations, but have never
> seen presented elsewhere, and is one I believe juries would understand:
>
> Addressing the jury:
>
> 1. The claim that there is no law....requiring the average American to pay
> income taxes and file tax returns.... has been made as far back as the early
> 1960's at least, perhaps even earlier. Those who made the claim were typically
> labeled as "kooks," "conspiracy theorists," and "tax cheats."
>
> 2. Yet the claim persisted, and re-surfaced year in and year out, albeit from
> a small number of people who had labored through the endless turning of pages
> at law libraries.
>
> 3. Many such people challenged the IRS with their research and the IRS's
> response was not to show them the law but, instead, to put them in jail to
> silence them. The victims of that ruthless tactic went to jail without having
> seen a law.
>
> 4. Then people began formally writing the Secretary of the Treasury, the
> Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service, the Attorney General, 535 members of
> Congress, the administrators of the Federal Register, Law Professors, and
> so-called legal scholars everywhere. Though a few members of Congress, and the
> keepers of the Federal Register, HAVE responded on rare occasions in earlier
> years by stating in writing that no entry in the Federal Register has ever
> identified a specific law requiring the paying of income taxes or filing of
> tax returns, no such admission has ever been made by the IRS, Treasury, or
> DOJ. There has been no such response by ANYONE in government in recent years.
>
> 5. Meanwhile, the IRS and DOJ has continued to discredit and put in jail the
> people who spoke out and insisted "there is no law."
>
> 6. There can be no question that the senior key people in all these government
> agencies have long known of the alleged "controversy." They have chosen to
> remain silent on the subject, speaking out only sufficiently to acknowledge
> that the tax code is "confusing," but insist that the claim, and the alleged
> evidence upon which it was founded, is ridiculous, frivolous, anti-American,
> and is only asserted by dishonest people who don't want to pay their "fair
> share."
>
> 7. Since the Internet has made researching the law relatively easy....as
> compared to the physical turning of pages in law libraries....and has made the
> results achieved more reliable than ever before, the number of people
> insisting there is no law has grown from a few to a few hundred thousand. This
> steadily expanding body of citizens includes educated people, professional
> people, doctors, dentists, businessmen and women, CPA's, former IRS agents,
> and a growing number of lawyers. These people are NOT kooks, they are NOT
> conspiracy theorists, they are NOT dishonest, and they don't wish to avoid
> paying any obligation they legitimately owe. They believe that if you see
> someone stealing from your neighbor, you ought to tell him.
>
> 8. After "government" has been painfully aware of the "confusion" and
> "controversy" for several decades, a prudent person would expect that the
> Congress would simply pass legislation that would clarify the issue and make
> the requirement (that most Americans are liable to pay income taxes and file
> returns) clear and unambiguous, eliminate the confusion, and put the
> "controversy" to rest, once and for all. They certainly would do that if there
> were any question as to the legality or illegality of murder or armed robbery
> or rape or child molestation.
>
> 9. But they haven't. The Congress has been tight-lipped and has said nothing.
> The DOJ and IRS have said, when accused of not answering the people's
> questions, "We ARE answering the questions. We're answering them with
> prosecutions." Instead of explaining their position to the people they profess
> to serve, they pull out a club and beat them over the head and say "You have
> to pay taxes and file returns because we SAY you do, and that's all you need
> to know."
>
> 10. Fifty years. Five decades. Two score and ten years. Half a century. In all
> that time, consider how much money the federal government has spent on
> investigations, raids of people's homes and offices, prosecutions, costs of
> trials, incarcerations, paying welfare to families left unsupported when heads
> of households go to prison, feeding and clothing and providing health care for
> those who they have incarcerated, and on and on the list of expenses goes, to
> say nothing of the untold numbers of people who have committed suicide because
> of IRS harassment, threats, and persecutions. That tactic has been a very
> expensive "non-solution" to a problem they could have easily solved 40 or 50
> years ago by simply passing into law an amendment that would need be no more
> than two or three paragraphs printed on a piece of paper. There are many taxes
> legitimately required by the tax code that are unequivocal and are plainly
> stated in simple language any reader can understand, but that is
> not the case with regard to the individual income tax. Why the law continues
> to imply, but deliberately not state a requirement, remains a mystery clouded
> in secrecy.
>
> 11. That brings up the question "WHY?" Why has Congress not amended the tax
> code to eliminate the "confusion" and the attendant "controversy," once and
> for all time?
>
> 12. Permit me to suggest the answer:...the only answer that makes any sense.
> "Because to pass such an amendment, clearly imposing a tax upon the wages and
> salaries, upon the labor and private property of U.S. Citizens, would violate
> the CONSTITUTION, and they aren't about to do that. It's much more profitable
> to just keep on extorting a TRILLION DOLLARS each year from an uninformed and
> gullible public, by using brute POWER and the force of arms to intimidate and
> terrorize the general population, and drive ever-increasing numbers of them to
> suicide.
>
> In closing, ladies and gentlemen of the jury, today YOU are the LAW. Today you
> can begin to turn the tide that will eliminate the illegal and
> unconstitutional taxes you and most Americans have been intimidated into
> paying since your first job at McDonald's, or wherever you began your earning
> life. As a jury, you have more power today than the Supreme Court of the
> United States, more power than all the lawyers, all the federal prosecutors
> and all the federal judges combined. Today you can return a verdict of NOT
> GUILTY that no power on earth can overturn, a verdict that you need never
> explain or justify to ANYONE, inside or outside of government, and a verdict
> that no one and no government agency can ever retaliate against you for
> rendering. Your decision can be questioned only by your own conscience and by
> God Almighty.
>
> Today you can do your civic duty to uphold the Constitution of the United
> States of America....when these representatives of government WILL NOT....and
> you can join for posterity those 56 brave men who pledged their lives, their
> fortunes, and their sacred honor. As Jesus Christ has said "I go to prepare a
> place for you," so too can you tell your children and grandchildren "I have
> helped to prepare a better place for you and your children." You can display
> and preserve your sacred honor TODAY for the whole world to see! You can do
> more today than all the juries which have gone before you in the past 50
> years. And you can forever hold your heads high, for you will truly be heroes.
> This defendant CANNOT BE FOUND GUILTY, unless and until someone SHOWS US THE
> LAW.
>
> Thank you.
> Fred Marshall
>
>  Note: If you have read this far, you need to come up with ideas how to to get
> the SOMNABULANT NATION to Wake UP.
>  George

======================================================================
Disclaimer: Information shared in the Stanley Scoop is not necessarily
the opinion of the editor or staff.  It is shared for information
purposes only and it is recommended that you come to your own conclusions.
======================================================================
Live Free or Die! Liberty in our Lifetime!
We the People Scoop
http://www.stanley2002.org
http://www.wtpconstitutionalactivism.org
Reply to: rick@...

Listen to: Standing Up for America Radio Show with Rick Stanley
Every Sunday, 6pm MST for 1 hour
On Truth Radio Network
to listen, click here: http://www.truthradio.com
Sponsored by:
Stanley Fasteners and Shop Supply http://www.stanleyfasteners.com

Also check out The Revolutionary Coalition!
This group is working to unite all third parties that defend the
constitution, independents, and non-voters (making up 60% of
Americans) into one SUPER THIRD PARTY!

On Yahoo groups at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TheRevolutionaryCoalition

This group has a single line platform: "To defend our (Natural)
God-given, unalienable, Constitutionally protected and guaranteed
rights."

Subscribe by sending email to:
therevolutionarycoalition-subscribe@yahoogroups.com


To subscribe to the We the People Constitutional Activism Scoop,
send a message to subscribe@...

If you wish to unsubscribe from We the People Constitutional Activism Scoop,
send a message to unsubscribe@...

All other changes for personal attention, such as changing your email address,
send to
webmaster@...


Be aware that you may be receiving mail forwarded from a group,
in which case you may have to visit http://groups.yahoo.com to unsubscribe.
Please also note that mail sent to our "reply to:" address,
newsletter@... is usually ignored....




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Rick Stanley
Constitutional Activist
E-mail: rick@...


We the People Scoop 3/07/07

========================================================================
WE THE PEOPLE SCOOP - TO EXPOSE!
**  Visit the website: http://www.stanley2002.org
**  OR Our NEW Offshore Site at http://www.wtpconstitutionalactivism.org
**  Like the Scoop? Forward it to everyone you know!
========================================================================


OPINION RELEASE:  BBC's Yellow Journalism Backfires



----- Original Message -----
From: "galen" <denzen@...>
Subject:   BBC's Yellow Journalism Backfires


  > uh oh.....

   BBC's 9/11 Yellow Journalism Backfires
> Building 7 becomes the Achilles heel of the official conspiracy theory
>
> Paul Joseph Watson
> Prison Planet
> Monday, March 5, 2007
>
>
> The BBC's Conspiracy Files documentary hit piece and their flustered
> attempts to adopt damage control over questions about why their
> correspondent reported the collapse of Building 7 before it happened,
> have only provoked a firestorm of new interest in 9/11 truth and exalted
> questions surrounding WTC 7 to the point where it is now the Achilles'
> heel of the official conspiracy theory.
>
> The BBC was forced to issue a second response on Friday afternoon
> following a barrage of criticism against their initial effort to dismiss
> the Building 7 fiasco and their claim that they had mysteriously lost
> all footage from BBC World's 9/11 coverage.
>
> Right from the word go, the BBC have attempted to cloud this issue by
> erecting and attacking another strawman framed debate, the accusation
> they were somehow part of a grand conspiracy on 9/11, in order to try
> and detract credibility from the questions being asked of them.
>
> In reality, this story boils down to two facets and the BBC has not
> provided an adequate answer to either of them:
>
> a) What was the source of the information that led the BBC to report
> that Building 7 had collapsed before it did? In his second response,
> head of BBC World Richard Porter cites CNN, local news media and unnamed
> firefighters who were interviewed after the fact, but still cannot
> provide an individual or authority by name.
>
> Porter attempts to create a scenario whereby the collapse of Building 7
> was easily anticipated, and this is why news organizations jumped the
> gun to report its demise. In reality, WTC 7 stood over 300 yards away
> from the twin towers and was partly shielded by WTC 6 which did not
> collapse yet was completely gutted by raging fires and debris damage,
> whereas WTC 7 had limited fires. Building 7 was structurally reinforced
> in 1989 giving it, "Enough redundancy to allow entire portions of floors
> to be removed without affecting the building's structural integrity,"
> according to the New York Times.
>
> The BBC's 9/11 Conspiracy Files documentary claimed that Building 7 was
> a "raging inferno," a gross error considering the fact that fires spread
> sporadically across just eight floors of the skyscraper.
>
> This is what the BBC describes as a "raging inferno," another example of
> how they concocted fallacies to smear 9/11 truth in their atrocious
> Conspiracy Files hit piece.
>
> Nobody could have anticipated the building's collapse unless they knew
> that explosive devices were in place to take it down. NYPD officers
> heard bombs as they ran away from its implosion. First responders were
> told that the building was to be "brought down," not that it was going
> to collapse on its own. The process of informing the news agencies in
> advance that it was in danger of collapsing was merely an attempt to
> precondition the watching audience to what would otherwise have been an
> extremely suspicious occurrence.
>
> We can now be reasonably confident in identifying the Rudy Giuliani's
> OEM as the source of the "warning" that Building 7 was going to
> collapse. OEM is New York City's Office of Emergency Management. OEM
> personnel, by pure coincidence of course, arrived early on the morning
> of 9/11 to prepare for an exercise that simulated a terrorist attack on
> New York City. They were located in Building 7.
>
> This means that the OEM were not only telling the BBC and other media
> that Building 7 had collapsed or was in the process of collapsing before
> it did, a forecast inconceivable in the context that no modern steel
> building had collapsed from fire damage alone allied to the fact that
> WTC 7 had been structurally reinforced to prevent such a collapse, but
> they were also handing out the explanation for its collapse in advance.
> In the BBC's footage, the anchor Phil Hayton states, "It seems this
> wasn't the result of a new attack but because the building had been
> weakened during this morning's attack."
>
> Richard Porter tacitly admits that such detailed foreknowledge of an
> event that is yet to occur is highly suspicious ("in one sense that's
> true") but then attempts to dismiss it simply because the reporter used
> the words "it seems."
>
> Building 7 fell in an almost perfect implosion at near free fall speed
> and its debris barely even blocked the street next to it -- the building
> collapsed in its own footprint. Surely a collapse as a result of fire
> damage, an event unparalleled with a modern steel building until that
> day, would have resulted in at least a marginally inconsistent collapse?
> Anyone with eyes to see can judge that this building was deliberately
> imploded, as news anchors like Dan Rather stated on the day.
>
> The Windsor Building in Madrid by comparison was a raging inferno and
> burned for over 24 hours yet did not collapse.
>
> The collapse of the Windsor Building in Madrid was, solely as a result
> of 9/11, anticipated by the media in triplicate but it never happened
> because modern steel buildings do not symmetrically collapse as a result
> of fire damage alone.
>
> Who would have anticipated the collapse of Building 7 in such
> circumstances? Certainly not Dutch demolition expert Danny Jowenko, who
> was shown the footage of Building 7 along with the building's structural
> diagrams and immediately concluded it was deliberately demolished.
>
> Whoever informed the news agencies that the building was about to
> collapse had precise knowledge of the fact that it was being
> deliberately "pulled," and only by identifying that individual or
> authority, be it Giuliani's OEM or anyone else, and putting them before
> a grand jury, can we move closer to cracking the cover-up.
>
> b) How can we trust the BBC or the establishment media in general to
> provide accurate information about any major event when all they do is
> repeat what is told to them and relay it as gospel with no independent
> verification whatsoever, to the point where we are told a building has
> collapsed by a reporter while it mockingly stands behind her head?
>
> Bob Woodward, the US journalist who helped break the Watergate scandal,
> last week called on reporters to "take more time on stories" and be more
> aggressive in verifying information given to them by official
> authorities. Woodward said the round the clock deadline news cycle is a
> "crazy environment" that needs to be "slowed down."
>
> The BBC Building 7 fiasco is a damning indictment of the slippery slide
> from real investigative reporting to "rip and read" instant
> gratification, whereby news organizations become mere public relation
> conduits for governments and "official" authorities. In that context the
> BBC are just as complicit as anyone else in manufacturing the official
> conspiracy theory behind 9/11 and the one that has remained simply
> because it was reported first. This myth is propagated by the fallacies
> of building collapses before the fact, magic hijacker passports that
> survive giant firey airline impacts, and deliberate suppression of
> dozens and dozens of eyewitness reports of bombs at all levels of the
> twin towers.
>
> The arrogance of Porter and the BBC in general in still refusing to even
> admit that they made an error in reporting the collapse of a building
> before it fell clearly illustrates the pomposity of these individuals in
> thinking themselves somehow above the scrutiny of the very people who
> fund their existence. This whole episode has led many who were
> previously highly skeptical of the "9/11 truth movement" to do their on
> research on this and the many other questions surrounding September 11.
>
> Building 7 is the weakest link holding together the official conspiracy
> theory that was dutifully propped up and retold by the lapdog mainstream
> media on 9/11. The Conspiracy Files debacle allied to the WTC 7 BBC
> fiasco that followed it has given 9/11 truth a fresh impetus and we
> thank the BBC in the context that their fallacious yellow journalism has
> resulted in a new wave of interest in dismantling the official fraud.
>
>
>
>
>
> #########################################################
> "A society whose citizens refuse to see and investigate the facts, who
> refuse to believe that their government and their media will routinely
> lie to them and fabricate a reality contrary to verifiable facts, is a
> society that chooses and deserves the Police State Dictatorship it's
> going to get."
> -- Ian Williams Goddard
>
>
> To be excluded from this group, please reply with "REMOVE" typed in the
> subject line.
>
>
>


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


> uh oh.....
>
> Subject: BBC's Yellow Journalism Backfires
>
>
>
>
>
> BBC's 9/11 Yellow Journalism Backfires
> Building 7 becomes the Achilles heel of the official conspiracy theory
>
> Paul Joseph Watson
> Prison Planet
> Monday, March 5, 2007
>
>
> The BBC's Conspiracy Files documentary hit piece and their flustered attempts
> to adopt damage control over questions about why their correspondent reported
> the collapse of Building 7 before it happened, have only provoked a firestorm
> of new interest in 9/11 truth and exalted questions surrounding WTC 7 to the
> point where it is now the Achilles' heel of the official conspiracy theory.
>
> The BBC was forced to issue a second response on Friday afternoon following a
> barrage of criticism against their initial effort to dismiss the Building 7
> fiasco and their claim that they had mysteriously lost all footage from BBC
> World's 9/11 coverage.
>
> Right from the word go, the BBC have attempted to cloud this issue by erecting
> and attacking another strawman framed debate, the accusation they were somehow
> part of a grand conspiracy on 9/11, in order to try and detract credibility
> from the questions being asked of them.
>
> In reality, this story boils down to two facets and the BBC has not provided
> an adequate answer to either of them:
>
> a) What was the source of the information that led the BBC to report that
> Building 7 had collapsed before it did? In his second response, head of BBC
> World Richard Porter cites CNN, local news media and unnamed firefighters who
> were interviewed after the fact, but still cannot provide an individual or
> authority by name.
>
> Porter attempts to create a scenario whereby the collapse of Building 7 was
> easily anticipated, and this is why news organizations jumped the gun to
> report its demise. In reality, WTC 7 stood over 300 yards away from the twin
> towers and was partly shielded by WTC 6 which did not collapse yet was
> completely gutted by raging fires and debris damage, whereas WTC 7 had limited
> fires. Building 7 was structurally reinforced in 1989 giving it, "Enough
> redundancy to allow entire portions of floors to be removed without affecting
> the building's structural integrity," according to the New York Times.
>
> The BBC's 9/11 Conspiracy Files documentary claimed that Building 7 was a
> "raging inferno," a gross error considering the fact that fires spread
> sporadically across just eight floors of the skyscraper.
>
> This is what the BBC describes as a "raging inferno," another example of how
> they concocted fallacies to smear 9/11 truth in their atrocious Conspiracy
> Files hit piece.
>
> Nobody could have anticipated the building's collapse unless they knew that
> explosive devices were in place to take it down. NYPD officers heard bombs as
> they ran away from its implosion. First responders were told that the building
> was to be "brought down," not that it was going to collapse on its own. The
> process of informing the news agencies in advance that it was in danger of
> collapsing was merely an attempt to precondition the watching audience to what
> would otherwise have been an extremely suspicious occurrence.
>
> We can now be reasonably confident in identifying the Rudy Giuliani's OEM as
> the source of the "warning" that Building 7 was going to collapse. OEM is New
> York City's Office of Emergency Management. OEM personnel, by pure coincidence
> of course, arrived early on the morning of 9/11 to prepare for an exercise
> that simulated a terrorist attack on New York City. They were located in
> Building 7.
>
> This means that the OEM were not only telling the BBC and other media that
> Building 7 had collapsed or was in the process of collapsing before it did, a
> forecast inconceivable in the context that no modern steel building had
> collapsed from fire damage alone allied to the fact that WTC 7 had been
> structurally reinforced to prevent such a collapse, but they were also handing
> out the explanation for its collapse in advance. In the BBC's footage, the
> anchor Phil Hayton states, "It seems this wasn't the result of a new attack
> but because the building had been weakened during this morning's attack."
>
> Richard Porter tacitly admits that such detailed foreknowledge of an event
> that is yet to occur is highly suspicious ("in one sense that's true") but
> then attempts to dismiss it simply because the reporter used the words "it
> seems."
>
> Building 7 fell in an almost perfect implosion at near free fall speed and its
> debris barely even blocked the street next to it -- the building collapsed in
> its own footprint. Surely a collapse as a result of fire damage, an event
> unparalleled with a modern steel building until that day, would have resulted
> in at least a marginally inconsistent collapse? Anyone with eyes to see can
> judge that this building was deliberately imploded, as news anchors like Dan
> Rather stated on the day.
>
> The Windsor Building in Madrid by comparison was a raging inferno and burned
> for over 24 hours yet did not collapse.
>
> The collapse of the Windsor Building in Madrid was, solely as a result of
> 9/11, anticipated by the media in triplicate but it never happened because
> modern steel buildings do not symmetrically collapse as a result of fire
> damage alone.
>
> Who would have anticipated the collapse of Building 7 in such circumstances?
> Certainly not Dutch demolition expert Danny Jowenko, who was shown the footage
> of Building 7 along with the building's structural diagrams and immediately
> concluded it was deliberately demolished.
>
> Whoever informed the news agencies that the building was about to collapse had
> precise knowledge of the fact that it was being deliberately "pulled," and
> only by identifying that individual or authority, be it Giuliani's OEM or
> anyone else, and putting them before a grand jury, can we move closer to
> cracking the cover-up.
>
> b) How can we trust the BBC or the establishment media in general to provide
> accurate information about any major event when all they do is repeat what is
> told to them and relay it as gospel with no independent verification
> whatsoever, to the point where we are told a building has collapsed by a
> reporter while it mockingly stands behind her head?
>
> Bob Woodward, the US journalist who helped break the Watergate scandal, last
> week called on reporters to "take more time on stories" and be more aggressive
> in verifying information given to them by official authorities. Woodward said
> the round the clock deadline news cycle is a "crazy environment" that needs to
> be "slowed down."
>
> The BBC Building 7 fiasco is a damning indictment of the slippery slide from
> real investigative reporting to "rip and read" instant gratification, whereby
> news organizations become mere public relation conduits for governments and
> "official" authorities. In that context the BBC are just as complicit as
> anyone else in manufacturing the official conspiracy theory behind 9/11 and
> the one that has remained simply because it was reported first. This myth is
> propagated by the fallacies of building collapses before the fact, magic
> hijacker passports that survive giant firey airline impacts, and deliberate
> suppression of dozens and dozens of eyewitness reports of bombs at all levels
> of the twin towers.
>
> The arrogance of Porter and the BBC in general in still refusing to even admit
> that they made an error in reporting the collapse of a building before it fell
> clearly illustrates the pomposity of these individuals in thinking themselves
> somehow above the scrutiny of the very people who fund their existence. This
> whole episode has led many who were previously highly skeptical of the "9/11
> truth movement" to do their on research on this and the many other questions
> surrounding September 11.
>
> Building 7 is the weakest link holding together the official conspiracy theory
> that was dutifully propped up and retold by the lapdog mainstream media on
> 9/11. The Conspiracy Files debacle allied to the WTC 7 BBC fiasco that
> followed it has given 9/11 truth a fresh impetus and we thank the BBC in the
> context that their fallacious yellow journalism has resulted in a new wave of
> interest in dismantling the official fraud.
>
   #########################################################
> "A society whose citizens refuse to see and investigate the facts, who refuse
> to believe that their government and their media will routinely lie to them
> and fabricate a reality contrary to verifiable facts, is a society that
> chooses and deserves the Police State Dictatorship it's going to get."
> -- Ian Williams Goddard

======================================================================
Disclaimer: Information shared in the Stanley Scoop is not necessarily
the opinion of the editor or staff.  It is shared for information
purposes only and it is recommended that you come to your own conclusions.
======================================================================
Live Free or Die! Liberty in our Lifetime!
We the People Scoop
http://www.stanley2002.org
http://www.wtpconstitutionalactivism.org
Reply to: rick@...

Listen to: Standing Up for America Radio Show with Rick Stanley
Every Sunday, 6pm MST for 1 hour
On Truth Radio Network
to listen, click here: http://www.truthradio.com
Sponsored by:
Stanley Fasteners and Shop Supply http://www.stanleyfasteners.com

Also check out The Revolutionary Coalition!
This group is working to unite all third parties that defend the
constitution, independents, and non-voters (making up 60% of
Americans) into one SUPER THIRD PARTY!

On Yahoo groups at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TheRevolutionaryCoalition

This group has a single line platform: "To defend our (Natural)
God-given, unalienable, Constitutionally protected and guaranteed
rights."

Subscribe by sending email to:
therevolutionarycoalition-subscribe@yahoogroups.com


To subscribe to the We the People Constitutional Activism Scoop,
send a message to subscribe@...

If you wish to unsubscribe from We the People Constitutional Activism Scoop,
send a message to unsubscribe@...

All other changes for personal attention, such as changing your email address,
send to
webmaster@...


Be aware that you may be receiving mail forwarded from a group,
in which case you may have to visit http://groups.yahoo.com to unsubscribe.
Please also note that mail sent to our "reply to:" address,
newsletter@... is usually ignored....




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Rick Stanley
Constitutional Activist
E-mail: rick@...


We the People Scoop 3/07/07

========================================================================
WE THE PEOPLE SCOOP - TO EXPOSE!
**  Visit the website: http://www.stanley2002.org
**  OR Our NEW Offshore Site at http://www.wtpconstitutionalactivism.org
**  Like the Scoop? Forward it to everyone you know!
========================================================================


  OPINION RELEASE:  The US of Tyranny


The US of Tyranny
>> by Christopher Manion
>> March 6, 2007
>>
>> I never thought that I'd have to write this about
>> that land that I love.
>>
>> But now there's no escaping the fact that our
>> government possesses tyrannical powers that are
>> unchecked by appeal to the "independent" courts.
>>
>> How this president, and future ones, will use that
>> power is unknown. As the historian Charles Burton
>> Marshall once famously said, "there's no such thing
>> as the foreseeable future."
>>
>> But what I have learned from people I trust tells me
>> that the future of our liberties is in grave peril.
>>
>> For instance, consider the Founding Fathers. They
>> made it clear that the greatest danger to liberty
>> was not England, or Islam, or Indians, or any
>> foreign foe. The greatest enemy was government - our
>> government, driven by lust for lucre and power,
>> breaking through the firm constitutional fences that
>> the Founders placed around it.
>>
>> Our Founders' biggest nightmare was the prospect of
>> an executive with totally unlimited power. They
>> relied on the dominant powers of the legislature,
>> facing frequent election by the "virtuous people" of
>> Federalist 57, who would also keep their
>> representatives in line.
>>
>> And consider the trustworthy conservative stalwart,
>> Paul Weyrich. He often admonishes well-meaning but
>> ungrounded conservatives: "do not give to your
>> friend any power that may someday fall into the
>> hands of your enemy."
>>
>> Against the grain of those dire warnings, past and
>> present, the Bush Administration has claimed, and
>> the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit has
>> just confirmed, the unlimited power of the executive
>> to do anything it wants to in the name of "national
>> security."
>>
>> Anyone - whether a foreigner or an American citizen
>> - can be kidnapped, at home or abroad, either by a
>> foreign government at the request of the U.S.
>> government, by an agent or employee(s) of the U.S.
>> government or by of the U.S. government itself. That
>> person can then be transported anywhere in the
>> world, imprisoned indefinitely, kept from any
>> outside contact, tortured, even killed.
>>
>> All in the name of "national security."
>>
>> And there is nothing you can do about it.
>>
>> The case in question was filed by one Khaled
>> El-Masri - but it could have happened to anybody.
>> El-Masri is a German citizen who says he was
>> kidnapped, jailed, and tortured by the CIA in
>> Europe. The Court's opinion, which is well worth
>> reading in full, narrates El Masri's claims:
>>
>> "[O]n December 31, 2003, while travelling in
>> Macedonia, he was detained by Macedonian law
>> enforcement officials; after twenty-three days in
>> Macedonian custody, he was handed over to CIA
>> operatives, who flew him to a CIA-operated detention
>> facility near Kabul, Afghanistan; he was held in
>> this CIA facility until May 28, 2004, when he was
>> transported to Albania and released in a remote
>> area; and Albanian officials then picked him up and
>> took him to an airport in Tirana, Albania, from
>> which he travelled to his home in Germany."
>>
>> El-Masri was released because the CIA finally
>> realized they thought he was somebody else. "Oops!
>> We tortured the wrong man. Sorry."
>>
>> According the New York Times, "in June 2006, a
>> report issued by the Council of Europe concluded
>> that Mr. Masri's account of having been abducted and
>> mistreated was substantially accurate. In January, a
>> German court issued arrest warrants for 13 people it
>> said were involved in the matter. Prosecutors would
>> not identify the suspects."
>>
>> According to German news reports, "Senior US
>> diplomats" tried to reverse the German government's
>> decision to prosecute those involved. The German
>> government refused, as the Italian government did in
>> a similar recent case.
>>
>> The CIA has had more success in the United States
>> courts than it did in Germany and Italy. Even though
>> it refuses to confirm or deny any part of Mr.
>> El-Masri's story, it has nonetheless demanded that
>> the U.S. Federal Courts throw the case down the
>> Memory Hole. In particular, it opposed El Masri's
>> appeal.
>>
>> The unanimous decision of the Court of Appeals
>> granting the CIA request is very readable - at least
>> for Kafka fans. In 24 calm and careful pages, the
>> court methodically closes off every avenue that any
>> victim of kidnapping, imprisonment, torture, or even
>> murder might use to seek justice under American law.
>> The rule is ironclad: if the government asserts that
>> such an effort will reveal "state secrets," the
>> revelation of which would violate the "national
>> interest," or be harmful to "national security," the
>> Court is required to vacate the case, and let the
>> Government off scot-free.
>>
>> Which is exactly what the unanimous appeals court
>> did last Friday.
>>
>> Like all ideological arguments, the Court's opinion
>> is very logical, once one accepts the axiomatic
>> preambles. In this case, the Court clearly
>> identifies the axiom: the Court is bound to trust
>> the Executive Branch, when the chips are down,
>> without question. It cannot use its own independent
>> judgment regarding the evidence, or lack thereof,
>> regarding the government's assertion of "state
>> secrets" that might be divulged at trial. In fact,
>> it cannot even see the evidence, much less question
>> it.
>>
>> "El Masri," the Court's opinion explains, "would
>> need to rely on witnesses whose identities, and
>> evidence the very existence of which, must remain
>> confidential in the interest of national security."
>>
>> Says who? The government, of course - from whose
>> illegal excesses the courts are supposed to protect
>> us.
>>
>> Thus, if you are kidnapped, raped, tortured, or even
>> killed by persons "whose identities must remain
>> confidential in the interest of national security,"
>> you and your heirs have no recourse under the laws
>> of the Land of the Free.
>>
>> "But wait," I hear you saying (or, perhaps,
>> screaming), "the judge is able to decide for himself
>> whether the "state secrets" claim is bogus, right?"
>>
>> Wrong. The Executive Branch, all on its own, has the
>> right to assert that the secrets are so sensitive
>> that even the Federal Judge himself cannot see them.
>>
>> "After information has been determined to be
>> privileged under the state secrets doctrine, it is
>> absolutely protected from disclosure - even for the
>> purpose of in camera examination by the court. On
>> this point, Reynolds could not be more specific:
>> "When . . . the occasion for the privilege is
>> appropriate . . . the court should not jeopardize
>> the security which the privilege is meant to protect
>> by insisting upon an examination of the evidence,
>> even by the judge alone, in chambers."
>>
>> And who "determines" that the information is
>> "privileged"? And that the "occasion" is
>> "appropriate"? Obviously, the Executive branch.
>> Period. Of course, the government must "satisfy" the
>> court that it is not abusing the "state secret"
>> privilege. But, when push comes to shove, the Judge
>> is not allowed to see the evidence on the basis of
>> which to make an independent judgment. He must take
>> the government's word for it. The government's
>> unexamined claim "satisfies" that requirement.
>>
>> Once the government hands him an "affidavit or
>> personal declaration" from the department head
>> making the claim, the judge must show "utmost
>> deference" to the government (note: that phrase
>> appears nowhere in the Constitution). The court is
>> not even allowed to ask the government to explain
>> its case, if the answer would itself create an
>> "unacceptable danger of injurious disclosure." The
>> government can stonewall the judge, but the Court's
>> hands are tied.
>>
>> Never mind that the "department head making the
>> claim" would be the most likely person to want to
>> cover up any crimes committed by his subordinates,
>> either by his order, or in a rogue operation which
>> the department head's ignorance had allowed to go
>> forward. If any crimes were exposed, the department
>> head would be either a criminal himself, or
>> criminally negligent, or grossly incompetent. In any
>> case, a rational person would demand that a Court
>> look at the man behind the curtain.
>>
>> But the "state secrets" doctrine now guarantees that
>> such government criminals are above - and beyond -
>> the law.
>>
>> But the government is our friend, isn't it? It helps
>> us after hurricanes and things. It is not -
>> certainly, it cannot be - the "enemy" that Mr.
>> Weyrich warns us against. Right?
>>
>> Dear reader, for the past four days some 5,000
>> "conservatives" have been milling around the lobby
>> of a Washington hotel at a meeting called "CPAC,"
>> wringing their hands about the inevitability of
>> President Hillary Rodham come January 2009.
>>
>> So, Bush fans, what was that you were saying about
>> no "enemy"?
>>
>> By the way, according to press reports, these
>> "conservatives" stood up and cheered when the White
>> House press spokesman defended the Iraq war,
>> including (one supposes - he hasn't quit, after all)
>> the "rendition" program that has snapped up untold
>> hundreds of El-Masris and spirited them off into the
>> black abyss of "national security."
>>
>> As always in things governmental, there is a certain
>> irony here. In the Declaration of Independence, our
>> Founding Fathers condemned the insane and tyrannical
>> King George III for the outrages committed by his
>> foreign mercenaries, including, "For protecting
>> them, by mock trial, from punishment for any murders
>> which they should commit on the inhabitants of these
>> states."
>>
>> At least the Colonists were given a "mock trial"
>> that exonerated the Hessian criminals. In modern
>> cases involving "national security," the criminals
>> need not worry about being subjected to any trial at
>> all.
>>
>> Once one gets over (if one can) the outrage brought
>> on by this blatant assertion of executive
>> power-by-fiat, some interesting practical
>> ingredients begin to emerge, factors that might have
>> motivated the Executive branch in its "state
>> secrets" claim. Such as: one of the defendants named
>> by El-Masri is George Tenet, the former director of
>> the CIA.
>>
>> We all know the most crucial evidence of Tenet's
>> disastrous professional performance at CIA. It is no
>> secret that his agency failed miserably in its
>> responsibility to protect us against 9-11. However,
>> he "played rough" when he left CIA: he wasn't going
>> to be the fall guy for 9-11, and Bush-Cheney
>> apparently decided that they'd better not call his
>> bluff. He knew too much. In order, one concludes, to
>> silence Tenet, Bush gave him the Medal of Freedom
>> (thus forever making that award worthless to any
>> future recipient, by the way).
>>
>> Moreover, the scathing report by the independent
>> Inspector general of the CIA's miserable performance
>> under Tenet was deep-sixed, and, unlike virtually
>> all other IG reports of its kind, it was never made
>> public. Tenet-friendly sources inside the CIA
>> complained that it was too "negative." Logical minds
>> outside the CIA might conclude that Tenet's CIA was
>> grossly incompetent. But we will never know. The IG
>> report is a "state secret."
>>
>> Most Americans, when they commit a crime, cannot
>> insist that their prosecution might reveal "state
>> secrets," and thus, on the power of their "personal
>> declaration" alone, dismiss the proceedings with the
>> back of their hand. No, they must persuade twelve
>> strong men and true of their case. But it is
>> increasingly apparent that the disastrously
>> incompetent and increasingly powerful executive
>> branch of the U.S. government can do just that - in
>> fact, it just did.
>>
>> Well, as Lenin used to say, what is to be done?
>>
>> Clearly a higher court could demand and end to the
>> "state secrets" charade. But Chief Justice Roberts
>> is undoubtedly well aware that President Lincoln
>> once issued an arrest warrant for Chief Justice
>> Roger B. Taney. And the neocon peanut gallery has
>> taken every possible occasion to assure President
>> Bush that he is the resurrection of Lincoln. After
>> all, under Lincoln,
>>
>> "Without the sanction of law the federal government
>> arrested men by the thousands and confined them in
>> military prisons. The number of such executive
>> arrests was certainly over 13,000, and it has been
>> estimated to have been as high as 38,000 (Columbia
>> Law Review, XXI, 527-28, 1921). This policy was
>> bitterly criticized in some quarters, but it is
>> generally assumed that the people as a whole
>> supported the arrest policy."
>>
>> Well, if the Court doesn't act, the Congress can.
>> But will it? After all, the Congress has been
>> cowering at the prospect of a constitutional
>> confrontation with Bush for over five years, and
>> there is no sign that it will change now, just
>> because the chairs have been rearranged. After all,
>> President Bush's "signing statements" have asserted
>> that the Congress is essentially irrelevant, and
>> President Hillary Clinton-Rodham will undoubtedly
>> follow suit after January 20, 2009.
>>
>> So "what is to be done" boils down to, "what shall
>> we do." And for that, I offer no better a role model
>> than the incredibly admirable Richard Wurmbrand.
>>
>> My father introduced me to Pastor Wurmbrand forty
>> years ago, shortly after he was released from prison
>> in Communist Romania. Why was he in prison? Because
>> the secret police had arrested him. Romania had been
>> delivered under the Communist boot by President
>> Franklin D. Roosevelt in his negotiations with his
>> good friend, "Uncle Joe" Stalin, at Yalta. As a
>> result, 100 million Christians, including the
>> Wurmbrands, were handed over to Communist dictators,
>> with the full faith and credit of the United States
>> government.
>>
>> According to Persecution.com, in 1945
>>
>> "Richard and Sabina Wurmbrand attended the Congress
>> of Cults organized by the [new] Romanian Communist
>> government. Many religious leaders came forward to
>> praise Communism and to swear loyalty to the new
>> regime. Sabina said, "Richard, stand up and wash
>> away this shame from the face of Christ." Richard
>> warned, "If I do so, you'll lose your husband." She
>> replied, "I don't wish to have a coward as a
>> husband." Thus Richard declared to the 4,000
>> delegates, whose speeches were broadcast to the
>> whole nation, that their duty is to glorify God and
>> Christ alone."
>>
>> Romania's Communist government jailed and tortured
>> Wurmbrand for a total of 13 years. His wife was also
>> jailed - and was then told that her husband had died
>> in prison. Finally, "in December 1965, the Norwegian
>> Mission to the Jews and the Hebrew Christian
>> Alliance paid $10,000 in ransom to the Communist
>> government to allow the Wurmbrand family to leave
>> Romania [Wurmbrand was a convert from Judaism]."
>>
>> When Pastor Wurmbrand appeared on "The Manion
>> Forum," my father's television program, he stood in
>> front of the cameras and stripped off his shirt to
>> show countless scars, the result of his torture in
>> captivity, to the audience. It was an unforgettable
>> moment.
>>
>> 23 years later, on Christmas day 1989, Nicolae
>> Ceausescu, the Communist dictator of Romania, and
>> his wife Elena, the regime's chief torturer, were
>> executed by a firing squad. Ceausescu sang the
>> "Internationale" and proclaimed that history would
>> vindicate him. Elena Ceausescu "told everybody to go
>> to hell." There were no apologies, only contempt for
>> their executioners. On the way to her execution,
>> Elena told her ungrateful captors, "I have been like
>> a mother to you."
>>
>> (Author's note: the Romanian national secret police
>> were called the Securitate, Romanian for "security."
>> Undoubtedly they conducted their kidnappings and
>> killings to protect "national security." The
>> Wurmbrands returned to Romania in 1990. Sabina
>> Wurmbrand died in 2000, and Pastor Richard Wurmbrand
>> died in 2001).
>>
>> http://www.lewrockwell.com/manion/manion73.html


======================================================================
Disclaimer: Information shared in the Stanley Scoop is not necessarily
the opinion of the editor or staff.  It is shared for information
purposes only and it is recommended that you come to your own conclusions.
======================================================================
Live Free or Die! Liberty in our Lifetime!
We the People Scoop
http://www.stanley2002.org
http://www.wtpconstitutionalactivism.org
Reply to: rick@...

Listen to: Standing Up for America Radio Show with Rick Stanley
Every Sunday, 6pm MST for 1 hour
On Truth Radio Network
to listen, click here: http://www.truthradio.com
Sponsored by:
Stanley Fasteners and Shop Supply http://www.stanleyfasteners.com

Also check out The Revolutionary Coalition!
This group is working to unite all third parties that defend the
constitution, independents, and non-voters (making up 60% of
Americans) into one SUPER THIRD PARTY!

On Yahoo groups at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TheRevolutionaryCoalition

This group has a single line platform: "To defend our (Natural)
God-given, unalienable, Constitutionally protected and guaranteed
rights."

Subscribe by sending email to:
therevolutionarycoalition-subscribe@yahoogroups.com


To subscribe to the We the People Constitutional Activism Scoop,
send a message to subscribe@...

If you wish to unsubscribe from We the People Constitutional Activism Scoop,
send a message to unsubscribe@...

All other changes for personal attention, such as changing your email address,
send to
webmaster@...


Be aware that you may be receiving mail forwarded from a group,
in which case you may have to visit http://groups.yahoo.com to unsubscribe.
Please also note that mail sent to our "reply to:" address,
newsletter@... is usually ignored....




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

FREEDOM TO FASCISM
TERROR STORM
911 MYSTERIES

'Want TV quality, ONE DOLLAR DVD copies of these wonderful Truth Movement videos
that are rising to the top of the Google Video rankings?

http://www.ibize.com/onedollardvd/

THIS IS FANTASTIC NEWS:

"A wave of 9/11 truth and other alternative documentaries have suddenly surged
up the Google Video rankings, with three "conspiracy" videos in the top eleven
alone, including Alex Jones' Terror Storm."

"Aaron Russo's America From Freedom to Fascism at number four."

"9/11 Mysteries sits at number fifteen."

See the link to the story on our ONE DOLLAR DVD page.
http://www.ibize.com/onedollardvd/
Click the TerrorStorm banner.

~~~~~~~

Thank you all for the most encouraging responses to my earlier announcement.

From your lips:

I am interested in your $1 DVDs - Both the 9/11 on and the Freedom to Fascism
one - probably the 3rd one also.  More info???  Let me talk to my husband and
see how many he wants.  Do you take checks or money orders?
Anne *:)

Just got info on your project.  Can you please send
list of what is available and how to get money to you?
  I would love to participate.  I have this great hope
that something I do or say will finally break through
the barriers and help these people see what I have
seen for too many years!  Russo's video, America From
Freedom to Fascism is outstanding!  Thanks for making
this available!!!
B C

Thanks for the reply. Send me 20 of each. I will put 60 cash in the mail today.
Bob

Hi Ron! Nice work...go ahead and send me 7 of each of the 3 dual dvd's mentioned
below along with a reminder (like Tom does) of the 21$ donation-which i will
send immediately upon receipt.
Dave

Bravo Bro!!
This is great and what I have also been doing. The
tool of the Divine is a DVD that is a million words of
expression in the moving pictures! Give thanks!!

UNITED WE STAND....DIVIDED WE FALL.
Keep rolling brother...keep rolling the ball!!
Yeah Mon!!!

do you take liberty dollars? do you take blank postal money orders? is it a
"suggested donation" or is there a set price per dvd? is there a shipping
charge? i have been wanting to see freedom to fascism for the longest time--a
friend went up to new hampshire to see it and didn't even invite me! are any
ready for shipment now? if not, when do you start shipping? sorry to bug you
with so many questions, but the isolation here in rhode island has really been
quenching my spirit. this is a way to edify folks and get something going here!
thanks again!
dianne

Please send me an email with your name and address so I can order DVD"s
Eugene

So how do I order?  I'd like to see the list.  I'd start with at least 20 of
Russo's Freedom to Fascism DVDs.
Regards,
Jere

The few who can understand the system (check, money and credits) will either be
so interested in its profits, or so dependent on its favors, that there will be
no opposition from that class, while on the other hand, the great body of the
people, mentally incapable of comprehending the tremendous advantage that
capital derives from the system, will bear its burdens without complaint, and
perhaps without even suspecting that the system is inimical to their interest. 
- The Rothschild Brothers of London

Yes..I would like 8 of the DVD's....4 or each combination.  ( I might change my
mind on the amount.)
My address forthcoming when you state the total price and if you accept PayPal.
Good luck and hope you get a lot of orders!
Please let me know what else you need in order to get these.  Thanks.
Lou K.   (Arizona)

Hey Neil, I put cash into the mail today for 60 copies (20 each of the double
DVDs).  I used a work envelope but please don't use that address.  I put my home
address inside the envelope.  Thanks!!!   nancy purks

Keep up the great work!  I wish I had had these for the march but I took action
too late.  However, I did give lots of dvds away which were made by DC911Truth

I would lik to buy each on of the DVD's you make.
I would also like to send you a CD I make.
:)
Jon

Hi Ron- I can't find your e-mail in my thousands of others so would you please
send me the e-mail to buy the DVD's by the 50's, etc again so I can post it to
some groups?  Thanks, Patti

Hi Ron,
Please send me more information on the cost and address to order the three
videos. We live in a location that only offers dial up and consecuently cannot
view Aaron Russos Freedom to Fascism video. Thanks and God Bless for what you
are doing.

Teresa

Please give me the website, address, email or whatever needed to order the
quantity DVD's you have mentioned. I am not clear where to order these from.
Dr. Robin

I learned from a friend that you are out to destroy our
socialist-super-capitalist society, one DVD at a time. Please email me with
details on what's on the DVD, along with your mailing address, so that if I can
scratch together enough fiat dollar bills to buy a small stack of your
inflammatory DVDs, I'll know where to send the thought police--uh--money.
Thanks.
Ron

    I  would like to participate in your $1 dvd offer. Please send further
instructions as per your www.ibize.com/ onedollardvd page.  I would commit to
twenty every other month for beginners.
  Kindest regards,
Ted

Bless you as well, Ron. These are a wonderful emails to wake up
to in these times. I'm sure I'm not the only one who doesn't
reply to every email from this project, partly out of keeping
the traffic low, and partly because we are so driven to give out
the DVDs, that it's a little hard to sit down and catch up on
email. Buddy (also on this project email list) and I have given
out over two thousand single-burner-burned DVDs in a year and a
half, and are completely thrilled to be among such honored
company as this project. One of the biggest thrills/rewards is
of course "The Stories" that occasionally come back to us from
the recipients. Every little story of discovery or enlightenment
fires us up to handout another hundred discs. Congrats on the
duplicator acquisition and keep in touch, my American friend.
Frank in South Carolina

http://www.ibize.com/onedollardvd/

Ron

There is discussion going on over at www.lastfreevoice.com
I would like to get some imput as to why we should run candidates.

Rick Stanley
Constitutional Activist
E-mail: rick@...


We the People Scoop 3/05/07

========================================================================
WE THE PEOPLE SCOOP - TO EXPOSE!
**  Visit the website: http://www.stanley2002.org
**  OR Our NEW Offshore Site at http://www.wtpconstitutionalactivism.org
**  Like the Scoop? Forward it to everyone you know!
========================================================================



OPINION RELEASE:  The "real reason" for America's failure:  No support for the
defending the Constitution


----- Original Message -----
From: "Rick Stanley" <rick@...>
To: "TheRevolutionary" <TheRevolutionaryCoalition@yahoogroups.com>
Cc: <frontoffice@...>
Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2007 10:17 PM
Subject: Fw: RELEASE: The Last Radio Show of Rick Stanley on Standing Up For
America

  STANLEY NOTE:  From my son... Why America has failed.... Nothing could say it
  better.  I am not the only constitutional defender in this country that has a
family that does not support his actions.  We wonder why America has failed.
There is no better reason than this.  It is ingrained in our children who would
dishonor us, rather than support defending the constitution, as we would direct
them.  My own son is a symptom of the problem.  It is far greater than America
can even imagine.
It touches upon our very existence as a free people with liberty.  It is the
acceptance of tyranny to
go along to get along.  My son told me two Thanksgivings ago that if the
government wanted
  him to, he would accept the chip in his hand or head.  Does anyone know the
horror that
statement meant to me? Could you imagine the failure I feel?  I have failed my
own children,
my own family, my country by extension.  I have failed.  Yes, I take it very
personally.  My son
  respects the government and dishonors my defense of our founding documents
enshrining
  liberty and freedom.  We are lost... This is one example in a billion it seems.
It is daunting.
It saddens me to my very core.

Rick Stanley

>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <rstanley11@
> To: "Rick Stanley" <rick@...>
> Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2007 8:38 PM
> Subject: Re: RELEASE: The Last Radio Show of Rick Stanley on Standing Up For
> America
>
>
>> Dad,
>>
>> I hope you did this for the right reason, the only thing that comes to my
>> mind is your family!!!  Hopefully, you can become the father we (the kids)
>> once remember only 8 years ago.
>>
>> Please do your family some "justice" and delete your email account and email
>> address book.  Let it go...
>>
>> Your Son,
>>
>> III
>>
>> -------------- Original message --------------
>> From: "Rick Stanley" <rick@...>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Rick Stanley
>>> Constitutional Activist
>>> E-mail: rick@...
>>>
>>>
>>> We the People Scoop 3/04/07
>>>
>>> ========================================================================
>>> WE THE PEOPLE SCOOP - TO EXPOSE!
>>> ** Visit the website: http://www.stanley2002.org
>>> ** OR Our NEW Offshore Site at http://www.wtpconstitutionalactivism.org
>>> ** Like the Scoop? Forward it to everyone you know!
>>> ========================================================================
>>>
>>>
>>> RELEASE: The Last Radio Show of Rick Stanley on Standing Up For America
>>>
>>>
>>> STANLEY NOTE: I just made an agonizing decision today, in a lifetime of
>>> decisions, some I didn't wish to make. I called Richard Palmquist, the owner
>>> of
>>> the network at Truth Radio, and told him of my decision to end my
>>> participation
>>> as the host of "Standing Up For America". I will go into some of the reasons
>>> this evening on the last show at http://www.truthradio.com or
>>> http://www.truthradio.org at 6:00 PM MST, Sunday, March 4, 2007. Nothing
>>> earth
>>> shattering caused my decision. Rather, it was a long term "future
>>> considerations" issue on my part. It has been weighing on my mind for some
>>> time.
>>>
>>> It has been a real pleasure doing this show on two different networks the
>>> past 5
>>> years. However, it is time to "retire" as a radio host for a myriad of
>>> reasons,
>>> mostly personal. I will be talking about the last five years of my activism
>>> for
>>> liberty, the reasons for the radio hosting retirement, and to discuss with
>>> my
>>> listeners if they wish, anything they wish, on tonights program. The call in
>>> line is 303-329-0481 and the show begins roughly at five after the hour, and
>>> goes for one hour.
>>>
>>> I will be asking for someone to take over the show, if they are so inclined.
>>> Anyone wishing to take the reins of the broadcasting booth per se, please
>>> call
>>> Richard Palmquist as soon as possible, at 1-805-929-8448 to discuss the
>>> issue.
>>> His e-mail address is frontoffice@... Richard Palmquist is a man
>>> of honor and it has been a privelege to work with him this past few years at
>>> Truth Radio. I would love for someone to take over the reins and keep the
>>> concept of "Standing Up For America" going on Sunday nights, or any other
>>> time
>>> slot a potential new host may wish to do. The show could probably be
>>> expanded
>>> to a daily format, whatever you could work out with Richard Palmquist.
>>>
>>> Liberty defending is a lifelong commitment, once one decides to head down
>>> that
>>> path. It is the same with anyone that I have known, who has been "so
>>> afflicted". Once you discover the tyranny in your life, one becomes "hooked"
>>> at doing "something" to end it.
>>>
>>> Listen tonight, and accept my profound regret that I will be unable to
>>> continue
>>> with the radio show. My activism for liberty will be taking new roads in the
>>> future. Those pathway decisions, are coming for me each day in the coming
>>> years
>>> of the POLICE STATE OF AMERICA, and for us all. My decisions are now going
>>> to
>>> be heavily weighted, as to the ramifications upon my wife and family for the
>>> future, as the police state comes down harder upon us, each day. I am sure
>>> you
>>> understand the gravity of which I speak, as each of you comes into more
>>> contact
>>> with the tyranny in your lives. I have been a messenger of sorts, of the
>>> destruction of your God given, natural, unalienable, constitutionally
>>> protected
>>> and guaranteed rights. My knowledge came first hand, or was passed on to me
>>> by
>>> many others who have also paid a heavy price for "discovering" and
>>> "exposing"
>>> the "system" of tyranny we are under today. It has been my honor to defend
>>> the rights enshrined in the constitution as a constitutional activist and
>>> liberty defender on "Standing Up For America".
>>>
>>> LIVE FREE or Die! LIBERTY in our Lifetime!
>>> Rick Stanley
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "frontoffice+truthradio.info"
>>> To: "Richard Palmquist"
>>> Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2007 3:31 PM
>>> Subject: A little help please
>>>
>>>
>>> Talk show hosts:
>>> It is Sunday afternoon. I just recieved a phone call from Rick Stanley, a
>>> long-time Sunday evening host on Truth Radio. Court pressures in his life
>>> demand
>>> that today's program will be his last. We understand his need to focus on
>>> his
>>> next court appearance. We wish you well, Rick, and look forward to the day
>>> of
>>> victory that will return you to Truth Radio.
>>>
>>> Meanwhile -- I need your help. I have just written something that needs
>>> proof
>>> reading. Will you help me. I plan to post this SOON at the top of our
>>> website.
>>> Before I do, I want you to tell me if you see any errors in it.
>>>
>>> Uncle Sam is having a conversation with Mr. Master Banker
>>>
>>> It is the early 1940's. The Second World War is raging. Patiotism is in high
>>> pitch in the U.S. There is an Internal Revenue Service somewhere, but few
>>> people
>>> know or care about it. A few years back the government "purchased" all gold
>>> from
>>> the people of the U.S. The currency is still gold backed, sort of, but there
>>> are
>>> wrenching problems in the banking industry. How to scrape together enough
>>> money
>>> to support the war is a big issue. At least, that's the way the public saw
>>> the
>>> issue. More to the point is the issue of how the influential owners of the
>>> twelve Federal Reserve Banks can use the war to increase their personal
>>> wealth.
>>> Here is how that problem was solved.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> This conversation was never held; but it happened.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Master Banker: Uncle Sam, you know we can't do this Federal Reserve thing
>>> for
>>> you for nothing. We don't mind helping you, but you have to help us too.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sam: You can create money at will. What else do you want?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Banker: I don't have to tell you that if we just keep doing that, the day
>>> will
>>> come when the dollar will have no value at all. We have to match the
>>> creation of
>>> money to the creation of goods and services. Otherwise, you know the
>>> routine:
>>> "Too many units of currency chasing too few goods means inflation." Money
>>> may be
>>> easy to create, and that's good. But to prevent price inflation we have to
>>> sop
>>> up some of the surplus.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sam: I am not a grade school student. I understand economics. Tell me what
>>> you
>>> have in mind.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Banker: We want you to collect an income tax and use it to feed back to our
>>> Federal Reserve System the money we will charge you for interest on the
>>> money we
>>> create for you and lend to you.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sam: Let me get this straight. You are going to use MY printing press to
>>> create
>>> dollar bills and you will pay me a couple pennies for the printing costs.
>>> Then,
>>> you will lend those dollars to my government and charge me the current
>>> interest
>>> rate for my use of my own money. Then, you want my people to pay a tax on
>>> their
>>> income in order to pay you interest on money that was mine in the first
>>> place.
>>> Is that what you want?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Banker. Exactly. I think you understand.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sam: I know how powerful you are. Power goes where money blows. But how can
>>> I
>>> justify charging income tax? Have you ever read the Fourth Amendment to my
>>> Constitution?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Banker: You mean the part about (chuckle) people being able to hide their
>>> paperwork, so-called being "secure in their papers?"
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sam: That's not a laughing matter.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Banker: Maybe not, but it's no problem either.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sam: Well, before you tell me why it is not a problem, let me just mention
>>> the
>>> Fifth article to the Amendments of the Constitution.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Banker: I knew you would say that. Your problem is that in order to collect
>>> income tax you have to know how much income a person earned. Right? And they
>>> would have to tell you. Right? And if they told you and made a mistake, they
>>> would be committing a crime. Right? And if you have a document from them
>>> signed
>>> under perjery - that means they testified against themselves. Right?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sam: Yes, and in order to be able to have confidence in the information
>>> reported
>>> we will have to collect it under penalty of perjury. Anybody who signed a
>>> report
>>> like that would be testifying against himself even if he told the truth,
>>> because
>>> the result would mean he would have to pay a tax - all acts prohibited by
>>> the US
>>> Constitution.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Banker: Sam, you have been living in the clouds too long. The Constitution
>>> establed three branhes of government. Right?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sam: You keep doing that. I am not a school kid. Yes, we have the Executive,
>>> the
>>> Legislative and the Judicial branches. They balance each other. That's the
>>> way
>>> the Contitution structured my government.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Banker: Exactly. Under Justice Marshall wasn't it made clear that the court
>>> system has the authority to tell us what the law is?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sam: Well, yes, but that doesn't solve the problem with the Constitution.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Banker: Yes, it does. It's easy. You just dodge the whole issue. You can't
>>> allow
>>> Congress to pass a law that says, "Show me your papers." That would violate
>>> the
>>> Constitution.I agree. Congress can't do that. You also cannot have Congress
>>> pass
>>> a law that says, "People must testify under oath about the accuracy of some
>>> elusive mathmatical calculations involving their income and expenses." So,
>>> you
>>> dodge those issues.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sam: Dodge the issue? I don't get it. You have defined the issue very well.
>>> How
>>> would I possibly get around it?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Banker: Have you ever heard of Walt Disney?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sam: Yes.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Banker: Good. Here's my idea. What is distasteful about the idea of the
>>> income
>>> tax?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sam: Obviously, people don't want to give up money they had to work to earn.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Banker: Of course. What if the income tax meant that people would GET MONEY
>>> instead of giving it up?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sam: Now that is just plain crazy talk. You'd better explain yourself.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Banker: Crazy stuff is Walt Disney's business. It is what he does for a
>>> living.
>>> So, have Disney studios produce a brief cartoon featuring that crazy Mickey
>>> Mouse character telling people that you are going to set up a plan that will
>>> allow them to get a big wonderful surprise in the mail each year. It will be
>>> a
>>> tax refund.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sam: Tax refund? How does that put money in your pocket?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Banker: Easy. Here's how it works. You require businesses to send to your
>>> Treasury Department a slice of every employee's paycheck. Then, tell the
>>> people
>>> how they should fill out a report every year that will help them get back
>>> some
>>> of that money.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sam: I get it. The boss takes money out of their check - money they won't
>>> miss
>>> because they never see it. Then once a year they can get a bonus from the
>>> government. Great idea.
>>>
>>> The boss is not paying an income tax for the employee. He is just sending in
>>> a
>>> deposit. The employee will want that yearly bonus, so he will be glad to
>>> volunteer to fill our our tax forms, even though the law does not require
>>> them
>>> to do it. What a genius you are! We will do it. But there is still a
>>> problem.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Banker: What's that?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sam: It won't be Constitutional and it won't be legal.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Banker: Not to worry. Haven't you noticed how the courts have been making
>>> decisions lately? The law is irrelevant in court. Instead, judges make
>>> decisions
>>> based on two broad concepts; "The interest of justice," and "Public Policy."
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sam: You are a genius. You are right. Nobody will look for the law, anyhow.
>>> They
>>> will be too busy keeping their books straight so they can get that annual
>>> refund.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> If you research the life of that great entertainer Walt Disney, you will
>>> find
>>> that just after he produced that Mickey Mouse cartoon that was played
>>> repeatedly
>>> in the theaters in the 1940's he had a dream. He wanted to buy a large
>>> parcel of
>>> land in Anaheim, California and construct a very expensive entertainment
>>> park.
>>> We know it as Disneyland. Disney's biographies make it clear that the task
>>> was
>>> not easy. I have spoken personally with one of the original animation
>>> artists
>>> who worked with Disney. She makes it clear that the financial challenges
>>> were
>>> immense. Disney even secured a second mortgage on his home. However, a
>>> recent
>>> biography makes it clear. A major banker who then served on the Board of
>>> Directors of ABC arranged for that network to provide the critical funding
>>> for
>>> Disneyland. Ironically, Walt Disney's genius has now overwhelmed that
>>> benefactor. Disney now owns ABC.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The point is that Master Bankers were granted the greatest gift of free
>>> capital
>>> in the world's history through the artistry of Walt Disney. Disneyland is a
>>> monument to the huge thank you Walt Disney received from those bankers: and
>>> it
>>> stands as a memorial to the acceptance by the U.S. public of the need to
>>> file an
>>> annual 1040 form. There is no law. There is only the benefit of the refund.
>>> That
>>> benefit was sold to your fathers by none other than Mickey Mouse. We are
>>> ruled
>>> by a Mickey Mouse system. Like it?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -- Richard Palmquist March 4, 2007
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> www.truthradio.com
>>> www.truthradio.info
>>> This e-mail is from Richard Palmquist
>>> Truth Radio: rp@...
>>> PO Box 344
>>> Nipomo, CA 93444
>>> Tell your friends about Truth Radio.
>>> IF YOU WRITE TO US AND WE DO NOT REPLY there can be only one reason. It
>>> would
>>> mean we deleted your e-mail with the hundreds of SPAM deletes each day. If
>>> that
>>> happens, phone me at:
>>> 805-929-8448

======================================================================
Disclaimer: Information shared in the Stanley Scoop is not necessarily
the opinion of the editor or staff.  It is shared for information
purposes only and it is recommended that you come to your own conclusions.
======================================================================
Live Free or Die! Liberty in our Lifetime!
We the People Scoop
http://www.stanley2002.org
http://www.wtpconstitutionalactivism.org
Reply to: rick@...

Listen to: Standing Up for America Radio Show with Rick Stanley
Every Sunday, 6pm MST for 1 hour
On Truth Radio Network
to listen, click here: http://www.truthradio.com
Sponsored by:
Stanley Fasteners and Shop Supply http://www.stanleyfasteners.com

Also check out The Revolutionary Coalition!
This group is working to unite all third parties that defend the
constitution, independents, and non-voters (making up 60% of
Americans) into one SUPER THIRD PARTY!

On Yahoo groups at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TheRevolutionaryCoalition

This group has a single line platform: "To defend our (Natural)
God-given, unalienable, Constitutionally protected and guaranteed
rights."

Subscribe by sending email to:
therevolutionarycoalition-subscribe@yahoogroups.com


To subscribe to the We the People Constitutional Activism Scoop,
send a message to subscribe@...

If you wish to unsubscribe from We the People Constitutional Activism Scoop,
send a message to unsubscribe@...

All other changes for personal attention, such as changing your email address,
send to
webmaster@...


Be aware that you may be receiving mail forwarded from a group,
in which case you may have to visit http://groups.yahoo.com to unsubscribe.
Please also note that mail sent to our "reply to:" address,
newsletter@... is usually ignored....




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Graphic version of this and more also at
     http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TerryLiberty/


   NEWS Google: war antiwar



     from the March 2, 2007 edition
     Democrats split over Iraq war funding  They're seeking to sway Bush's war
policy when his request for $93.4 billion comes up next week.  By Gail Russell
Chaddock | Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor




   WASHINGTON - After starting the 110th Congress with a big antiwar mandate,
Democrats are scrambling to find a way forward on an issue that is driving
wedges deep into their new majority.

   At issue is how aggressively Democrats can challenge President Bush's war
policy without alienating so many of their own caucus members that they lose key
votes.
   The next test will be how the House handles Mr. Bush's $93.4 billion
war-funding request, which comes before the Appropriations Committee next week.



   MoreAt http://www.csmonitor.com/2007/0302/p03s03-usfp.html





   Austin TX War Protest 2007.01.27 (Higher Speed Version)
"Troops out now. The democrats are not pushing for that. They won the election
but they are not taking a serious stance against the war," protest organizer
Benjamin Douglas said. Last night [Saturday], Bush attended the annual Alfalfa
Club dinner with his wife Laura. The black-tie event brings together
Washington's political and business elite to poke fun at events around the
world.
   News8Austin stories&video at
http://www.news8austin.com/content/top_stories/default.asp?ArID=178327



   Antiwar Radio: Scott Horton
   DailyAt http://antiwar.com/blog/category/antiwar-radio




   LIVE UNSCREENED Call-in TV

   Phone 477.ACTV (1.512.4772288)
     March 4 Sunday 10pm Central Time


     on Time Warner Austin Cable TV 10
AND...   (Worldwide)
Peer 2 Peer: AustinLibertyInterNet Radio/TV*




       Sunday on 'Jeff Davis Show'
    http://hometown.aol.com/tfijdshow/



   NowAlsoOn www.YouTube.com
   Jeff Davis Show" videos on youtube
   http://youtube.com/profile?user=jeffdavisshow


   with Terry Liberty Parker of  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian




   Crank up yer webcam as we experiment with YOUR face LIVE on TV


     Look for me (especially Sunday eves) as:

   TxLiberty on Yahoo Messenger & MSN Messenger

   Terry Liberty Parker on Skype
   (supports multiple platforms like
   MAC & Linux along with Windows)

   and maybe AustinLiberty on AIM






   WindowsMedia Download Playback of THIS show soon after ending as
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/JD070301.wmv



     free FROM: AustinLibertyInterNet Radio/TV
at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LibertyProspects/links


   (Due to popular demand, the system is often too busy to respond; so try back
often.  Right click playbacks to 'save target as...' to download selections to
your computer for replay later at your convenience and as often as you want)









   PBS Secrets of the Dead: D-Day
D-Day vets recall "the greatest invasion in history" and the technology (from
gliders to tanks that could "swim") that made it possible. Liev Schreiber
narrates the program, which supplements the interviews with archival footage and
re-creations. One of the most important innovations: the landing craft, built by
a New Orleans shipbuilder from the design of a boat he had sold to rumrunners
(and the government agents who chased them) during Prohibition. (2004)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/PBSSecretsDeadDDay.wmv




the Longest Day (Download ONLY)
One of the greatest war films ever made, recounting the World War II Normandy
invasion with an international cast. John Wayne, Robert Mitchum, Henry Fonda,
Rod Steiger, Richard Burton, Robert Ryan, Sal Mineo, Curt Jurgens. Mayor:
Bourvil. Maud: Kenneth More. Sheen: Stuart Whitman. Ranger: Fabian. Schultz:
Richard Beymer. Based on Cornelius Ryan's bestseller. Directors include Andrew
Marton and Ken Annakin. Cast & Credits: John Wayne, Robert Mitchum, Henry Fonda,
Richard Burton, Eddie Albert (1962)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/LongestDayH.wmv




When Parents Are Deployed (Download ONLY)
A program about the children of deployed parents, focusing on efforts by "Sesame
Street" producers to help approximately 700,000 children under age 5 who are
waiting for a deployed parent to come home from military service. Cuba Gooding
Jr. hosts.
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/WhenParentsDeployedH.wmv




ABC Nightline: 2007.02.27
Ordeal and recovery from mortal injury of ABC Iraq reporter, Bob Woodruff
including his family
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/ABCntln070227Woodruff.wmv




ABC: To Iraq and Back- Bob Woodruff Reports
ABC News' Bob Woodruff recalls the January 2006 roadside bombing in Iraq that
severely injured him, and recounts his recovery in Germany and at Bethesda Naval
Hospital in Maryland, where he is joined by his wife, Lee. Woodruff also
profiles U.S. service personnel recovering from injuries at Bethesda.
(2007.02.27)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/ABCIraqnBackWoodruff.wmv




HBO: Baghdad E.R. (Download ONLY)
Graphic, forthright examination of two months at the 86th Combat Support
Hospital in Baghdad, where medical personnel describe their daily duties while
treating a wide range of casualties and dealing with the loss of life. Also
included is footage of rescue missions outside the Green Zone. Directed by Jon
Alpert and Matthew O'Neill. (2006)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/BaghdadERh.wmv




National Geographic: Arlington- Field of Honor
a day at the national cemetery on the Potomac, "where ritual and respect are
woven tightly together," says narrator Frankie R. Faison. The hour interweaves
funerals (including those of a former Vietnam MIA soldier and a soldier who died
in Iraq) and the meticulous preparations for them with a thumbnail history of
Arlington National, the onetime home of George Washington's step-grandson, whose
daughter married Robert E. Lee. President Taft, Joe Louis and Dashiell Hammett
are among the notables buried at Arlington, but the most famous person resting
here is JFK, who visited the cemetery several months before his assassination.
His tour guide recalls the visit: "He said it was so beautiful he could stay
here forever (2004)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/ArlingtonFieldHonor.wmv




PBS Tavis Smiley: 2007.03.01
Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Cal.), chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and
Government Reform; 1968 Olympic gold medalist Tommie Smith. (2007)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/TS070301.wmv




NOTE: if any of these LoRez internet playbacks stimulate your interest in
getting a clearer copy, please 'Google' that selection to locate a legal source
if one is not otherwise given already.



   PBS Charlie Rose 2007.01.19
Have you seen the movie, Battle of Algiers? Former US Scty of State, Henry
Kissinger, Alistair Horne (Author, Savage War of Peace) & others on today's
middle east conflicts
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/PBSRose070119.wmv


Battle of Algiers (Download ONLY)
Gillo Pontecorvo's prize-winning, semidocumentary re-creation of the Algerian
struggle to overthrow French colonialism, from 1954 to 1962. Mathieu: Jean
Martin. Kader: Yacef Saadi. Dubeis: Tommaso Neri. Ali: Brahim Haggiag. Halima:
Fawzia El Kader. Cast & Credits: Yacef Saadi, Jean Martin, Brahim Haggiag,
Tommaso Neri, Samia Kerbash (1965)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/BattleOfAlgiersH.wmv



Also See Much More In Folder:
*Featured in AustinLibertyInterNet Radio/TV
Some more recent additions, upgrades or items otherwise of special interest;
before they are re-distributed to other folders in this collection.
   AND the folder
  War & Peace
Initiating physical assault upon innocent persons is wrong




   MilitaryIndustrialComplex: Why We Fight
In a nationally televised 'farewell' address on January 17, 1961, only four days
before John F. Kennedy's inaugural, two term 1950s US Prez Dwight Eisenhower,
who was also a 4 star General and Supreme Commander of the Allied assault
against Hitler in WWII, warned of the dangers of 'undue influence' exerted by
the 'military-industrial complex' (he would know, afterall)
   MoreAt http://www.worldpolicy.org/journal/hartung01.html
   AddressTextAt http://www.eisenhower.utexas.edu/farewell.htm
   WikipediaAt http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military-industrial_complex
   FlashPlaybackAt
http://www.sonyclassics.com/whywefight/main.html




   NOTE: if any of these LoRez internet playbacks stimulate your interest in
getting a clearer copy, please 'Google' that selection to locate a legal source
if one is not otherwise given already.




   Paisan (Download ONLY)
Roberto Rossellini's account of the Allied invasion of Italy during World War
II, told in vignettes. Compassionate and powerful. Mostly nonprofessional cast.
Filmed under primitive conditions, it remains a remarkable achievement. Cast &
Credits: Maria Michi, Gar Moore, Harriet White, Dots M. Johnson, Carmela Sazio
(1947)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/PaisanH.wmv




49th Parallel (Download ONLY)
Survivors of a sunken Nazi submarine flee across Canada. Eric Portman, Laurence
Olivier, Leslie Howard, Glynis Johns, Raymond Massey, Anton Walbrook. Michael
Powell directed. Cast & Credits: Eric Portman, Leslie Howard, Laurence Olivier,
Glynis Johns, Raymond Massey (1941)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/49thParallelH.wmv




Red Dawn (Download ONLY)
Reagan era invasion fantasy! John Milius's story of Colorado high schoolers
conducting guerrilla warfare against Russian invaders. Patrick Swayze, C. Thomas
Howell. Bella: Ron O'Neal. Erica: Lea Thompson. Matt: Charlie Sheen. Daryl:
Darren Dalton. Toni: Jennifer Grey. Danny: Brad Savage. Cast & Credits: Patrick
Swayze, C. Thomas Howell, Ron O'Neal, Lea Thompson, Jennifer Grey (1984)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/RedDawnVH.wmv




Clint Eastwood: the Charlie Rose show (Download ONLY)
War then & now (2006.12.19)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/PBSRose061219EastwoodH.wmv




Clint Eastwood: Inside the Actors Studio
Clint Eastwood reflects on his experiences shooting such films as "A Fistful of
Dollars," "The Good, the Bad and the Ugly," "Dirty Harry" and "Unforgiven" in an
expanded two-hour edition. Eastwood also talks about directing himself in
movies, his love of music and the art of listening as an acting tool. Clips:
"Bird," "Unforgiven" and "Mystic River." James Lipton hosts. (2003)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/ActorsStudioClintEastwood.w\
mv




StarTrekVGR: Random Thoughts of Violence (Download ONLY)
On a planet of telepaths where crime is unheard of, a savage beating sparks an
investigation that centers on Torres (Roxann Dawson), who is charged with
"aggravated violent thought." Tuvok: Tim Russ. Janeway: Kate Mulgrew. Neelix:
Ethan Phillips. Cast & Credits: Kate Mulgrew, Robert Beltran, Tim Russ, Ethan
Phillips, Roxann Dawson
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/StarTrekVGRRandomThoughtsVi\
olenceH.wmv




Anger Management (Download ONLY)
A timid guy (Adam Sandler) is sentenced to an anger-management program run by an
overly aggressive psychiatrist (Jack Nicholson). The stars shine, the material
doesn't. Sandler's former "Saturday Night Live" castmates Kevin Nealon and Nancy
Walls costar. Look for a slew of cameos, including former New York City Mayor
Rudolph Giuliani, New York Yankees Roger Clemens and Derek Jeter, plus legendary
hotheads Bobby Knight and John McEnroe. Cast & Credits: Adam Sandler, Jack
Nicholson, Marisa Tomei, Luis Guzman, Allen Covert (2003)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/Inetpub/wwwroot/Webfiles/AngerManagementH.wmv




Taxi Driver (Download ONLY)
Martin Scorsese directed this disturbing portrait of a cabbie driven to madness
by urban decay. Robert De Niro gives a brilliant performance. Iris: Jodie
Foster. Betsy: Cybill Shepherd. Wizard: Peter Boyle. Palantine: Leonard Harris.
Sport: Harvey Keitel. Andy: Steven Prince. Score by Bernard Herrmann. Written by
Paul Schrader. Cast & Credits: Robert De Niro, Jodie Foster, Cybill Shepherd,
Peter Boyle, Leonard Harris (1976)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/TaxiDriverH.wmv




AMC: Independent Spirit Awards
Sarah Silverman hosts the 2007 Independent Spirit Awards, live from Santa
Monica, honoring the year's best achievements in independent film. Best Feature
nominees include "Little Miss Sunshine," "American Gun," "The Dead Girl," "Half
Nelson" and "Pan's Labyrinth."
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/IndependentSpiritAwards.wmv




Airplane! (Download ONLY)
Wacky takeoff of all those all-star airport movies. Ted Striker: Robert Hays.
Elaine: Julie Hagerty. McCroskey: Lloyd Bridges. Captain Oveur: Peter Graves.
Dr. Rumack: Leslie Nielsen. Kramer: Robert Stack. Murdock: Kareem Abdul-Jabbar.
Cast & Credits: Robert Hays, Julie Hagerty, Lloyd Bridges, Peter Graves, Leslie
Nielsen (1980)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/AirplaneH.wmv




the Sound of Music (Download ONLY)
Oscar-winning adaptation (restored to its original length) of the classic
Rodgers and Hammerstein musical stage hit. Maria: Julie Andrews. Baron von
Trapp: Christopher Plummer. The Baroness: Eleanor Parker. Max: Richard Haydn.
Liesl: Charmian Carr. Cast & Credits: Julie Andrews, Christopher Plummer,
Eleanor Parker, Richard Haydn, Charmian Carr (1965)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/SoundOfMusicVH.wmv





       Also See Much More In Folder:
   *Featured in AustinLibertyInterNet Radio/TV
Some more recent additions, upgrades or items otherwise of special interest;
before they are re-distributed to other folders in this collection.

   AND in the folder....
    War & Peace
Initiating physical assault upon innocent persons is wrong


       free FROM: AustinLibertyInterNet Radio/TV
at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LibertyProspects/links


   (Due to popular demand, the system is often too busy to respond; so try back
often.  Right click playbacks to 'save target as...' to download selections to
your computer for replay later at your convenience and as often as you want)






                         * 'PeerCasting' continuously now as
'AustinLibertyInterNet'
via 'Yellow Pages' at www.PeerCast.org

Distributed networking like www.PeerCast.org may enable people to
create an alternative to govt licenced & controlled broadcasting.
That can be useful when promoting things that challenge, or may be
inconvenient to, established  authority :)
Please test this (at various times as needed) as an audience member
(or even another 'caster) and let me know of your experience(s).


   ExploreAt http://www.peercast.org/
get a very small self installing program
then select 'yellow pages'
to find 'AustinLibertyInterNet' webcasting
as an experiment by me in 'distributed networking'
then please let me know of your experience















     -Terry Liberty Parker
AND Find More Free On-demand Playbacks On-line via
AustinLibertyInterNet Radio/TV
at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LibertyProspects/links VoiceCall 1.512.462.1776

     every Sunday 7pm (central) to ?
I host informal discussion
to which all are welcome
who want to consider ideas & issues
of Liberty & Justice for ALL

   ON-LINE:

       Look for me (especially Sunday eves) as:

   TxLiberty on Yahoo Messenger




   PicAt http://www.wilsonsalmanac.com/images/byron_naked.jpg












---------------------------------
Looking for earth-friendly autos?
  Browse Top Cars by "Green Rating" at Yahoo! Autos' Green Center.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Graphic version of this and more also at
     http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TerryLiberty/



   NEWS Google: middle east force philosophy


     Published: February 23, 2007
     FORT CAMPBELL, Ky., Feb. 22 (AP) — An American soldier was sentenced to 100
years in prison Thursday for taking part in the gang rape and murder of an Iraqi
girl and the killing of her family
   MoreAt http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/23/us/23rape.html



   As the fourth anniversary of the Iraq war approaches, a new study by Mother
Jones magazine has found that the number of fatal terrorist attacks has
increased by over 600 percent since the U.S. invasion


   MoreAt http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=07/02/22/1448247



   LIVE UNSCREENED Call-in TV

   Phone 477.ACTV (1.512.4772288)
     Feb 25 Sunday 10pm Central Time


     on Time Warner Austin Cable TV 10
AND...   (Worldwide)
Peer 2 Peer: AustinLibertyInterNet Radio/TV*




       Sunday on 'Jeff Davis Show'
    http://hometown.aol.com/tfijdshow/



   NowAlsoOn www.YouTube.com
   Jeff Davis Show" videos on youtube
   http://youtube.com/profile?user=jeffdavisshow


   with Terry Liberty Parker of  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian




   Crank up yer webcam as we experiment with YOUR face LIVE on TV


     Look for me (especially Sunday eves) as:

   TxLiberty on Yahoo Messenger & MSN Messenger

   Terry Liberty Parker on Skype
   (supports multiple platforms like
   MAC & Linux along with Windows)

   and maybe AustinLiberty on AIM






   WindowsMedia Download Playback of THIS show soon after ending as
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/JD070218.wmv



     free FROM: AustinLibertyInterNet Radio/TV
at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LibertyProspects/links


   (Due to popular demand, the system is often too busy to respond; so try back
often.  Right click playbacks to 'save target as...' to download selections to
your computer for replay later at your convenience and as often as you want)









   Casualties of War (Download ONLY)
Brian De Palma directed this story about the rape and murder of a Vietnamese
girl by four U.S. soldiers. Michael J. Fox, Sean Penn. Clark: Don Harvey.
Hatcher: John C. Reilly. Diaz: John Leguizamo. Oahn: Thuy Thu Le. Brown: Erik
King. Rowan: Jack Gwaltney. Reilly: Ving Rhames. Hawthorne: Don Martin.
Screenplay by David Rabe. Cast & Credits: Michael J. Fox, Sean Penn, Don Harvey,
John C. Reilly, John Leguizamo (1989)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/CasualtiesOfWarH.wmv




   USA Marines (Download ONLY)
Director John Grant's documentary examines the culture of being a marine.
Included: recruit training during boot at Parris Island, S.C.; a tour of the
National Museum of the Marine Corps in Triangle, Va. Also: comments from retired
general Michael Hagee, 33rd commandant of the Marine Corps; and military
reporter Thomas Ricks. (2007)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/theMarinesH.wmv




   HBO: Ghosts of Abu Ghraib
Potent exposé of the abuse of prisoners at the infamous Iraq prison in the fall
of 2003, detailed by some of the soldiers and detainees involved. Included:
images of torture; interviews with legal scholars and journalists. Directed by
Rory Kennedy. A Grand Jury Prize nominee at the Sundance Film Festival.
(2007.02.22)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/GhostsAbuGhraib.wmv

   SeeAlso http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=07/02/22/1448252




   USA WWI Vet's Bonus Army (Download ONLY)
The efforts of USA WWI veterans to collect promised compensation for their war
service is examined in director Robert Uth's film. The men marched on
Washington, D.C., in 1932 and lobbied for their cause, setting up tents near the
capitol. USA military used troops and tanks to force the veterans to leave.
Actor Gary Sinise narrates. Based on the book "The Bonus Army: An American
Epic," by Paul Dickson and Thomas B. Allen. (2006)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/MarchBonusArmyH.wmv

   SeeAlso http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=07/02/22/1448218




   the Last Samurai (Download ONLY)
Tom Cruise in beautifully haunting tale of 19th century Japan's violent clash of
old and new culture. A disillusioned Civil War vet (Tom Cruise) undergoes a
spiritual rebirth after he's taken prisoner by samurai warriors in 1876 Japan. A
gripping story with sumptuous visuals and textured characters. Oscar nominee Ken
Watanabe adds solid support as a samurai leader. The film scored three other
Oscar nominations, including Best Sound. Edward Zwick directed and co-wrote the
script. Cruise, who also co-produced, spent two years preparing for the role.
Cast & Credits: Tom Cruise, Ken Watanabe, Timothy Spall, Billy Connolly, Tony
Goldwyn (2003)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/LastSamuraiH.wmv




NOTE: if any of these LoRez internet playbacks stimulate your interest in
getting a clearer copy, please 'Google' that selection to locate a legal source
if one is not otherwise given already.




   PBS Charlie Rose 2007.01.19
Have you seen the movie, Battle of Algiers? Former US Scty of State, Henry
Kissinger, Alistair Horne (Author, Savage War of Peace) & others on today's
middle east conflicts
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/PBSRose070119.wmv


Battle of Algiers (Download ONLY)
Gillo Pontecorvo's prize-winning, semidocumentary re-creation of the Algerian
struggle to overthrow French colonialism, from 1954 to 1962. Mathieu: Jean
Martin. Kader: Yacef Saadi. Dubeis: Tommaso Neri. Ali: Brahim Haggiag. Halima:
Fawzia El Kader. Cast & Credits: Yacef Saadi, Jean Martin, Brahim Haggiag,
Tommaso Neri, Samia Kerbash (1965)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/BattleOfAlgiersH.wmv



Also See Much More In Folder:
*Featured in AustinLibertyInterNet Radio/TV
Some more recent additions, upgrades or items otherwise of special interest;
before they are re-distributed to other folders in this collection.
   AND the folder
  War & Peace
Initiating physical assault upon innocent persons is wrong




   MilitaryIndustrialComplex: Why We Fight
In a nationally televised 'farewell' address on January 17, 1961, only four days
before John F. Kennedy's inaugural, two term 1950s US Prez Dwight Eisenhower,
who was also a 4 star General and Supreme Commander of the Allied assault
against Hitler in WWII, warned of the dangers of 'undue influence' exerted by
the 'military-industrial complex' (he would know, afterall)
   MoreAt http://www.worldpolicy.org/journal/hartung01.html
   AddressTextAt http://www.eisenhower.utexas.edu/farewell.htm
   WikipediaAt http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military-industrial_complex
   FlashPlaybackAt
http://www.sonyclassics.com/whywefight/main.html




   NOTE: if any of these LoRez internet playbacks stimulate your interest in
getting a clearer copy, please 'Google' that selection to locate a legal source
if one is not otherwise given already.




   Impostor (Download ONLY)
In the year 2079, a military scientist (Gary Sinise) desperately tries to prove
his true identity after he's accused of being a booby-trapped android from outer
space. Maya: Madeleine Stowe. Hathaway: Vincent D'Onofrio. Nelson: Tony
Shalhoub. Dr. Carone: Tim Guinee. Cast & Credits: Gary Sinise, Madeleine Stowe,
Vincent D'Onofrio, Tony Shalhoub, Tim Guinee (2002)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/ImpostorH.wmv




   the Gold Rush (Download ONLY)
Pathos, tenderness, slapstick---Charles Chaplin mines them all in this 1942
reedit of the silent classic, which features narration by Chaplin and a new
music score (written by Chaplin). Set in turn-of-the-century Alaska, Charlie's a
would-be prospector. Among the comic gems: Charlie, near starvation, eats a meal
of boiled boots and spaghetti-like shoelaces; Charlie tries to keep his balance
in a cabin atop a cliff. Georgia Hale, Mack Swain. Cast & Credits: Charles
Chaplin, Mack Swain, Tom Murray, Georgia Hale, Henry Bergman (1925)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/theGoldRushH.wmv




   Shane (Download ONLY)
George Stevens has taken a familiar theme (a bitter conflict between
homesteaders and cattle ranchers) and made a memorable and meaningful film.
Characterizations of rare depth and poignancy, beautifully realized by Alan
Ladd, Jean Arthur, Van Heflin and Brandon de Wilde. A screen classic. Wilson:
Jack Palance. Lewis: Edgar Buchanan. Ryker: Emile Meyer. Chris: Ben Johnson.
Torrey: Elisha Cook Jr. Cast & Credits: Alan Ladd, Jean Arthur, Van Heflin,
Brandon de Wilde, Jack Palance (1953)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/ShaneH.wmv




   Oklahoma! (Download ONLY)
The Rodgers and Hammerstein classic celebrating rural romance at the turn of the
century from 19th to 20th. Gordon MacRae, Shirley Jones, Charlotte Greenwood,
Gene Nelson, Gloria Grahame, Eddie Albert, Rod Steiger, Barbara Lawrence, James
Whitmore, Jay C. Flippen. Songs include "Oh, What a Beautiful Mornin'," "The
Surrey with the Fringe on Top," "Kansas City" and "I Cain't Say No." Fred
Zinnemann directed. Cast & Credits: Gordon MacRae, Shirley Jones, Gloria
Grahame, Gene Nelson, Charlotte Greenwood (1955)
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/OklahomaH.wmv





       Also See Much More In Folder:
   *Featured in AustinLibertyInterNet Radio/TV
Some more recent additions, upgrades or items otherwise of special interest;
before they are re-distributed to other folders in this collection.

   AND in the folder....
    War & Peace
Initiating physical assault upon innocent persons is wrong


       free FROM: AustinLibertyInterNet Radio/TV
at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LibertyProspects/links


   (Due to popular demand, the system is often too busy to respond; so try back
often.  Right click playbacks to 'save target as...' to download selections to
your computer for replay later at your convenience and as often as you want)






                         * 'PeerCasting' continuously now as
'AustinLibertyInterNet'
via 'Yellow Pages' at www.PeerCast.org

Distributed networking like www.PeerCast.org may enable people to
create an alternative to govt licenced & controlled broadcasting.
That can be useful when promoting things that challenge, or may be
inconvenient to, established  authority :)
Please test this (at various times as needed) as an audience member
(or even another 'caster) and let me know of your experience(s).


   ExploreAt http://www.peercast.org/
get a very small self installing program
then select 'yellow pages'
to find 'AustinLibertyInterNet' webcasting
as an experiment by me in 'distributed networking'
then please let me know of your experience















     -Terry Liberty Parker
AND Find More Free On-demand Playbacks On-line via
AustinLibertyInterNet Radio/TV
at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LibertyProspects/links VoiceCall 1.512.462.1776

     every Sunday 7pm (central) to ?
I host informal discussion
to which all are welcome
who want to consider ideas & issues
of Liberty & Justice for ALL

   ON-LINE:

       Look for me (especially Sunday eves) as:

   TxLiberty on Yahoo Messenger




   PicAt http://www.wilsonsalmanac.com/images/byron_naked.jpg












---------------------------------
Food fight? Enjoy some healthy debate
in the Yahoo! Answers Food & Drink Q&A.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]