Bob,

The money issue is perhaps one of the most important to confront our
society, and to understand just the legal aspects of it requires a
considerable amount of study. To fully understand this issue and
participate in the legal debate about it, one must have a working
knowledge of economics as well as law. THE best legal treatise on this
issue is Edwin Vieira’s Pieces of Eight, a 1600+ page, two volume work
with thousands of footnotes. If you wish to read something less imposing
that is posted on the Net, the money issue brief I drafted is posted here:

http://home.hiwaay.net/~becraft/MONEYbrief.html

Since this is one of the most important issues, lots of people are
interested in it, but regrettably are unwilling to devote the time
necessary to understand it. There are distinct periods in the legal
history of this issue: the pre-Civil War era, the post-Civil War era,
the 1913 era when the FRS was created, the Great Depression era, and
then the events subsequent thereto. Those who have engaged in the
essential study of this issue thus become conversant with these
important facts and legal changes and can intelligently discuss the
issue. But, those who haven’t engaged in this study are pre-disposed to
believe every fairy tale they hear, even tho such has no factual or
legal proof. The popular patriot beliefs about HJR 192 falls into this
category of unfounded beliefs. Let me give you a rough explanation of
the error regarding this popular but baseless argument.

At the time this country was founded, the Piece of Eight, a Spanish
minted silver dollar, was the prevalent currency. The word dollar as
appears in Atr. 1, §9 and the 7th Amendment to the US Const means this
coin. The 1792 Coinage Act scientifically defined “dollar” in this
constitutional sense: 371.25 grains of pure silver. From a patriot
viewpoint, I believe that ALL patriots should accept this as the
definition of “dollar” and make this argument the basis for our
objections to the current monetary system that has been established to
defraud the American people.

There were minor legislative adjustments to the monetary system prior to
the War of Northern Aggression. But, a student of the money issue must
also understand the various decisions of the Supremes regarding the
“changes” in monetary law that happened during this period regarding
legal tender and the validity of both Northern and Southern paper
“money”. Furthermore, one must understand the “crime of 1874" that
created the “trade dollar”, and comprehend that this was the first
assault of the banking system on our specie based monetary system: bank
paper and credit are always at war with a specie-based monetary system.
After this assault, there was also the assault of the late 1890s that
claimed the creation of a “gold standard”. To fully understand these
events requires a good working knowledge of what was happening
internationally regarding the international medium of exchange.

In the 1920s, the constitutional dollar was still that established via
the 1792 Coinage Act, but a “gold standard” facade had been superimposed
thereon. From economic history, it is quite obvious that the banking
industry was planning at that time another assault on specie: it
expanded credit during the roaring ‘20s, then contracted it. In the
early ‘30s, the constitutional silver dollar was still the
constitutional monetary standard, but there was also that additional
unit of the gold standard, the gold coin. All HJR 192 did was legally
stop the operation of the “gold standard” in effect at that time. While
paying gold debts was the subject of HJR 192, it did nothing to the
constitutional standard, the silver dollar. After HJR 192, dollar debts
could still be paid via constitutional coin. But, the legal effect of
HJR 192 ended in 1977.

But if you wish to learn about the reasons for the enactment of HJR 192,
may I suggest you consider that old investigative technique, “follow the
money.” There were lots of obligations to pay gold debts in existence in
the early 1930s: private corporations, BANKS and many other types of
debtors. Preventing the payment of gold obligations clearly favored the
debtors of those obligations, to the detriment of their creditors. It
was these gold obligation debtors who were the primary beneficiaries of
HJR 192. The historical evidence shows that there were at least twice as
many private gold debtors as there were public, govt gold debtors. Thus
the primary beneficiaries of this legislation were the private gold
debtors, and may I suggest, altho I cannot offered definitive evidence,
that a large number of these beneficiaries were banks. If anything, HJR
192 was just another example of the political power in this country
favoring the “friends of paper money and credit.”

A more recent example of Congress favoring the banking/credit industry
in this country was last year’s bailout. We know that Congress dispensed
about 350 billion bux within months of the bailout, but may I ask why in
the hell did “Hanky Panky” Paulsen get 200 million of this amount?
Others have offered observations and comments about the bailout,
especially concerning Goldman Sachs, and I strongly encourage you to
read these articles:

The Great American Bubble Machine (7 parts)

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/29127316/the_great_american_bubble_ma\
chine

The Big Takeover (9 parts)

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/26793903/the_big_takeover.

The Dirty Dozen

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/26868968/the_dirty_dozen

What amazes me is that wild stories about HJR 192 are accepted by
ordinary Americans who clearly know nothing about the legal and factual
background for this issue. Having no knowledge about this issue, they
accept these wild stories, while those with a background and
understanding of both the relevant legal and factual events of this
period do not. Gurus like Roger Elvick have promoted the idea that HJR
192 “stole all our credit”, and based on this thesis, he has concocted
an argument that is best described as the “legal” justification for
stealing cars. Further, this Elvick argument became an important aspect
of his 1099-OID argument, on which people have been filing claims for
tax refunds that have absolutely no legal basis. My protests of “don’t
do that” were ignored and lots of people followed this bad “guru”
advice. Please take notice that DoJ is gearing up to prosecute lots of
people who were 1099-OID advocates.

Edwin has certainly read all of the debates of HJR 192 that are
published in the Congressional Record and I have read probably most of
them. Neither of us has reached the conclusion that HJR 192 was a
declaration of national bankruptcy. Edwin’s analysis of HJR 192 appears
in his Pieces of Eight, and I shortly discuss it in the above money
issue brief. If you wish to put some spin on HJR 192, then I suggest
that it was simply one of the steps of the banking industry in its war
against specie. By creating credit and convincing people to use it as a
medium of exchange, the bankers reap tremendous benefits. HJR 192 thus
represents one event where Congress was convinced that if it eventually
created a fiat monetary system, it would reap benefits identical to
those of the bankers. Surely, what Beardsley Ruml openly stated in 1946
was quietly mentioned to fed officials during the consideration of HJR 192.

To contend that there was some secret national bankruptcy hidden behind
HJR 192 requires some sort of proof, which you admit does not exist. Why
ignore facts, but believe something that cannot be proven?

Larry

-- Jon
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Constitution Society 2900 W Anderson Ln C-200-322, Austin, TX 78757
512/299-5001 www.constitution.org jon.roland@...
-------------------------------------------------------------------

Microeffect Listeners,

On Saturday afternoon, Dec. 12, between 3 to 5 PM (Eastern), 2 to 4 PM
(Central), 1 to 3 PM (Mountain), Noon to 2 PM (Pacific), Liberty’s
Hammer & Anvil radio show (hosted by Larry Becraft and Tom Cryer) will
broadcast on the Microeffect Radio Network, and you may listen over the
Net here:

http://www.themicroeffect.com/listenlive.htm

Our guests for Sat’s show will be Don Casey, an expert on what is coming
at us like a freight-train: globalization. As a sample, look at this:

http://www.vimeo.com/7602634

We would like to hear your own comments about that event and any others
of interest. We invite your calls:

(208) 935-0094

Larry Becraft   (I forgot to change the date)

Microeffect Listeners,

On Saturday afternoon, Dec. 5, between 3 to 5 PM (Eastern), 2 to 4 PM
(Central), 1 to 3 PM (Mountain), Noon to 2 PM (Pacific), Liberty’s
Hammer & Anvil radio show (hosted by Larry Becraft and Tom Cryer) will
broadcast on the Microeffect Radio Network, and you may listen over the
Net here:

http://www.themicroeffect.com/listenlive.htm

Our guests for Sat’s show will be Don Casey, an expert on what is coming
at us like a freight-train: globalization. As a sample, look at this:

http://www.vimeo.com/7602634

We would like to hear your own comments about that event and any others
of interest. We invite your calls:

(208) 935-0094

Larry Becraft

Dear Patriot:

The following Truth Attack newsletter is being sent to you courtesy of a member of the Truth Attack Coalition.  We encourage all patriots to support Truth Attack and its coalition members who are unified in our mutual goal—putting the government back in its box—one tentacle at a time!

TRUTH ATTACK!

NEWS FROM THE FRONT

December, 2009

 

Tom Cryer, CC&BW                 Pastor Joe Larson, Chaplain             Anne Nonamus, NFTF Editor

 

"It is a republic, Madam . . . if you can keep it." B. Franklin

 

TUNE IN FOR TRUTH ATTACK'S "FOLLOW THE MONEY" SPECIAL SERIES ON LIBERTY WORKS RADIO NETWORK THIS COMING WEEK

 

THE TRUTH ATTACK HOUR FEATURES WEEK-LONG FIVE PART SERIES WITH A SPECTACULAR LINE-UP OF GUESTS DECEMBER 14-18, 2009, 5-6 P.M. EASTERN!

SANDERS! BECRAFT! VIEIRA! GRIFFIN! LABORDE!

Have you been wondering why people are having such a hard time making ends meet although they're making more than they ever have?  Why people cannot buy or spend enough to prevent job losses?  Why you keep putting more and more into your retirement account but its value keeps going down, down, down? 

Where is our buying power going?  Who is getting it? 

LET'S FOLLOW THE MONEY AND FIND OUT!

Tune in to the Truth Attack Hour on LWRN during the week of December 14-18, Follow The Money Week.  All five days will be showcasing experts on our monetary and banking system and at the end you will understand why it is broken, who broke it, how and why they broke it, who is benefiting--who is losing and how to protect yourself and your hard-earned assets.

Host Tom Cryer will interview the nation's top money and banking experts.

MONDAY!!  Franklin Sanders, banking expert, on why bankers are banksters, the effects of fictional credit as money and loaning money into circulation;

TUESDAY!!  Larry Becraft, trial attorney and expert on taxation and economics, on what is money, the invisible tax and how to defeat it;

WEDNESDAY!!  Edwin Vieira, author of "Pieces of Eight" and the nations foremost authority on monetary history and law;

THURSDAY!!  G. Edward Griffin, author of the famous expose' on the Federal Reserve Bank, "The Creature From Jekyll Island"; and finally,

FRIDAY!!  Larry LaBorde, author of "Investing Without A Net", a precious metals investment expert who will tell you how you can protect your assets from the impending economic melt-down caused by our broken monetary system.

CALL IN NUMBER FOR QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS:  410 848-9191

Follow The Money Week on The Truth Attack Hour, December 14-18, 5-6 p.m. Eastern.  This is a terrific opportunity to help your friends and family understand why our economy is failing and cannot succeed without the restoration of sound money and the dismantling of the privately owned and controlled Federal Reserve Bank.  Tell everyone you know to tune in.

Solving the problem begins with understanding the problem.  Understanding the problem begins with Liberty Works Radio Network and The Truth Attack Hour with Tom Cryer, weekdays, 5-6 p.m. Eastern on The Eagle, 94.3 FM, Dunnellon, FL, and on the internet at www.lwrn.net.

 

TRUTH ATTACK STORE IS OPEN

CHECK IT OUT!  NEWLY OPEN STORE OFFERING SIGNS AND BUMPER STICKERS AND INCLUDES LINKS TO OTHER PRODUCTS EVERY PATRIOT NEEDS

 

          Truth Attack's store is now open for "bidniss".  We're offering signs and bumper stickers and will be adding more in the near future.  Our latest addition is the book that served as the materials for TA's Tea Party Squared "Lost Art of Citizenry" Seminars in Florida.  This book contains secrets and inside information on how politicians gauge public opinion and numerous ways to get your message across.  The store operates on the basis of replacement costs, not on profit, so you know that your purchase is really a requisition that replaces itself.  We want it to be as cheap and easy as possible for you to spread the TA message.

 

IF WE ALL DO SOMETHING WE WILL ALL ACCOMPLISH SOMETHING

 

FORWARD—TO FREEDOM!

 

PLEASE FORWARD

DON'T LET THIS IMPORTANT INFORMATION STOP

WWW.TRUTHATTACK.ORG

DISCLAIMER (Damole Lawyers):  Truth Attack (TA) cannot provide legal advice nor does it provide any advice on any tax filing procedure or content.  TA does not provide or propose any particular tax method, strategy or procedure, nor does it recommend or suggest that anyone refuse to file tax returns or pay taxes.  The information provided and disseminated by TA is purely for the purpose of informing the public of the truth regarding the income tax law and of its fundamental rights under the Constitution as defined and interpreted by the United States Supreme Court.

IF YOU DO NOT WISH TO RECEIVE THESE UPDATES

Click “reply” and type “Unsubscribe” in the subject line and send.

Microeffect Listeners,

  On Saturday afternoon, Dec. 5, between 3 to 5 PM (Eastern), 2 to 4 PM
(Central), 1 to 3 PM (Mountain), Noon to 2 PM (Pacific), Liberty’s
Hammer & Anvil radio show (hosted by Larry Becraft and Tom Cryer) will
broadcast on the Microeffect Radio Network, and you may listen over the
Net here:

  http://www.themicroeffect.com/listenlive.htm

  Our guests for Sat’s show will be Dan Gonzales from Florida and Rick
Wos, Ill. Delegate to the We The People Continental Congress 2009,
recently concluded.

  We would like to hear your own comments about that event and any others
of interest. We invite your calls:

  (208) 935-0094

  Larry Becraft

Darren,

Lots of people have gross misunderstandings about that definition of United States. Below is what I have posted on my website regarding that matter:

XXIV. 28 U.S.C. § 3002 (15)(A):

The FDCPA simply regulates the collection activities of all federal agencies, departments, commissions, boards and instrumentalities, including the above federal corporations. Rather than repeatedly state in this 30+ page act that all "federal agencies, departments, commissions, boards and instrumentalities, including federal corporations" shall do certain things, all these entities are, for purposes of this particular act, encompassed within the words, "United States." Wherever the words "United States" appears in this law regulating these federal collection activities, it means all these various entities, including "Federal corporations".

Larry

Was the included picture accurate?

Was what looks like a coil inside the capsule actually a coil?

What is the function of that coil?
 

Mike Vanhooser wrote:

(I'm going to be sorry for this...)  Ok Dale Evans, why don't you "enlighten" me.  For the record, there is no statistical evidence of elevated cancer occurance in standard livestock.  The only place it occurs is in pets, and that cannot be correlated to the chips exclusively, but is likely influenced by the chip being placed in the same area as shots are administered, therefore it does not provide a single causality and is statistically corrupted.  I am out of the livestck business, but I would not chip now bcause of the demanded governmental interferrence, not any safety concern, because there is none.  Anyway, my initial point was that the article was BS, that the chip giving him cancer was highly unlikely, and the chip emitting EMF was impossible, so the credibility of the story was zero. --- On Sun, 11/29/09, Elena <phl5016@...> wrote:   From: Elena <phl5016@...> Subject: Re: [Lex_Rex] Inventor's terminal cancer courtesy of Verichip? To: "Mike Vanhooser" <novaelec@...> Cc: Lex_Rex@yahoogroups.com Date: Sunday, November 29, 2009, 3:29 PM   I'm a Montana rancher and I too agree with Twain. BTW NONE of my animals are or will ever be "chipped". If you were a REAL rancher you'd know the facts and you would never allow your animals to be "chipped". Mike Vanhooser wrote: > Ok, so you, a person who has no clue about chipping and probably can't even describe the operational parameters, much less having ever handled one, is going to tell me, a fourth generation rancher and RF engineer, I don't know what I'm talking about.  I could give you a dissertation about migration, encapsulation and benign sarcomas, but from your tone I doubt you would listen or believe.    As Mark Twain so eloquently put it, "Never argue with idiots..." >  >  > --- On *Sun, 11/29/09, Elena /<phl5016@...>/* wrote: >  >  >     From: Elena <phl5016@...> >     Subject: Re: [Lex_Rex] Inventor's terminal cancer courtesy of >     Verichip? >     To: "Mike Vanhooser" <novaelec@...> >     Cc: "Tommy Cryer" <CryerLaw@...>, Lex_Rex@yahoogroups.com, >     TheAmericanRepublic@yahoogroups.com, "Larry Becraft" >     <becraft@...> >     Date: Sunday, November 29, 2009, 2:04 PM >  >     And how do you know your livestock didn't have cancer? Did you or >     the USDA test them before or after slaughter? "Airtight >     authority"? The same authority as when E.coli and other reasons >     necessitate a recall? >  >     Mike Vanhooser wrote: >     > This article is BS. I have been using these chips in livestock >     for nearly 20 years, with no cancers caused by the chips. Also, >     the chips do not radiate any type of RF unless they are being >     excited by a chip reader within a few inches of the chip. So his >     story of reading EMF is also BS. Being an RF engineer I can speak >     with airtight authority about this. This is nothing but a "black >     helicopter" article with zero credibility. >     > >     > >     > --- On *Sun, 11/29/09, Larry Becraft /<becraft@hiwaay. net>/* wrote: >     > >     > >     >     From: Larry Becraft <becraft@hiwaay. net> >     >     Subject: [Lex_Rex] Inventor's terminal cancer courtesy of >     Verichip? >     >     To: "Tommy Cryer" <CryerLaw@aol. com>, Lex_Rex@yahoogroups .com, >     >     TheAmericanRepublic @yahoogroups. com >     >     Date: Sunday, November 29, 2009, 10:40 AM >     > >     > >     >     Secretly implanted Verichip caused cancer in inventor and he >     may die: >     > >     >     http://pesn. com/2009/ 11/28/9501591_ Bob_Boyce_ cancer_by_ >     >     Verichip/ >     >        <http://pesn.com/2009/11/28/9501591_Bob_Boyce_cancer_by_Verichip/> >     > >     > >     > >     >     ------------ --------- --------- ------ >     > >     >     <*> TO SUBSCRIBE (to Larry Becraft, Jon Roland, & Mark Ferran), >     >     send an email to: Lex_Rex-subscribe@ yahoogroups. com >     >     </mc/compose?to=Lex_Rex-subscribe@yahoogroups.com >     </mc/compose?to=Lex_Rex-subscribe@yahoogroups.com>> >     >     Yahoo! Groups Links >     > >     >     <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: >     >     http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/Lex_ Rex/ >     >     <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Lex_Rex/> >     > >     >     <*> Your email settings: >     >     Individual Email | Traditional >     > >     >     <*> To change settings online go to: >     >     http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/Lex_ Rex/join >     >     <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Lex_Rex/join> >     >     (Yahoo! ID required) >     > >     >     <*> To change settings via email: >     >     Lex_Rex-digest@ yahoogroups. com >     >     </mc/compose?to=Lex_Rex-digest@yahoogroups.com >     </mc/compose?to=Lex_Rex-digest@yahoogroups.com>> >     >     Lex_Rex-fullfeature d@yahoogroups. com >     >        </mc/compose?to=Lex_Rex-f%21%0A%20ullfeatured@yahoogroups.com >     </mc/compose?to=20ullfeatured@yahoogroups.com>> >     > >     >     <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: >     >     Lex_Rex-unsubscribe @yahoogroups. com >     >     </mc/compose?to=Lex_Rex-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com >     </mc/compose?to=Lex_Rex-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>> >     > >     >     <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: >     >     http://docs. yahoo.com/ info/terms/ >     >     <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> >     > >     >  >

Thank you for this great article.  I am posting it on PyraBang to counter the many pro-freeman arguments being presented there. 

If you have any more information of this nature, I would greatly appreciate it, so I can add it to my PyraBang portfolio. 

Even better… why not join me as a comrade in arms to help stop people from being harmed by such nonsense? 

We do not have to worry about censorship because it is definitely not allowed by PyraBang. 

 

I hope you join my group.  I need all the help I can get! 

http://www.pyrabang.com/go/dandan/auto

 

Kindest regards,

Dan

 

p.s. – I am considering editing the title of your article to read, “Larry Becraft analyzes the legal [basis] of Mercier's Invisible Contracts” 

This is how the article appears on PyraBang:

Really? Invisible Contracts?
Larry Becraft analyzes the legal basis of Mercier's Invisible Contracts. Avoid the mire of patriot myths.

 

 

Redistributing Wealth the Old Fashioned Way -

Voluntarily!

 

I live off what I make.  Government needs to live on what they already take!

 

No government ought to be without censors and where the press is free, no one ever will - Thomas Jefferson,
Letter to George Washington, September 9, 1792

 

Get paid to share important news and information that the Main Stream Media does not tell us.

Join PyraBang today!  Let me be your sponsor 

http://pyrabang.com/go/dandan 

 

This pro-American song needs to be shared with everyone
http://pyrabang.com?id=cbf180

Just imagine if we could hear it every day on

Liberty Works Radio Network
Reawakening Americans to the founding principles, natural rights & limited government

 

United States National Debt Clock
Check the outstanding public debt clock racing up more debt with more info...  See what your share of the debt is!!!

 

I'm a Montana rancher and I too agree with Twain.
BTW NONE of my animals are or will ever be "chipped". If you were a REAL
rancher you'd know the facts and you would never allow your animals to
be "chipped".

Mike Vanhooser wrote:
> Ok, so you, a person who has no clue about chipping and probably can't
> even describe the operational parameters, much less having ever
> handled one, is going to tell me, a fourth generation rancher and RF
> engineer, I don't know what I'm talking about.  I could give you a
> dissertation about migration, encapsulation and benign sarcomas, but
> from your tone I doubt you would listen or believe.    As Mark Twain
> so eloquently put it, "Never argue with idiots..."
>
>
> --- On *Sun, 11/29/09, Elena /<phl5016@...>/* wrote:
>
>
>     From: Elena <phl5016@...>
>     Subject: Re: [Lex_Rex] Inventor's terminal cancer courtesy of
>     Verichip?
>     To: "Mike Vanhooser" <novaelec@...>
>     Cc: "Tommy Cryer" <CryerLaw@...>, Lex_Rex@yahoogroups.com,
>     TheAmericanRepublic@yahoogroups.com, "Larry Becraft"
>     <becraft@...>
>     Date: Sunday, November 29, 2009, 2:04 PM
>
>     And how do you know your livestock didn't have cancer? Did you or
>     the USDA test them before or after slaughter? "Airtight
>     authority"? The same authority as when E.coli and other reasons
>     necessitate a recall?
>
>     Mike Vanhooser wrote:
>     > This article is BS. I have been using these chips in livestock
>     for nearly 20 years, with no cancers caused by the chips. Also,
>     the chips do not radiate any type of RF unless they are being
>     excited by a chip reader within a few inches of the chip. So his
>     story of reading EMF is also BS. Being an RF engineer I can speak
>     with airtight authority about this. This is nothing but a "black
>     helicopter" article with zero credibility.
>     >
>     >
>     > --- On *Sun, 11/29/09, Larry Becraft /<becraft@hiwaay. net>/* wrote:
>     >
>     >
>     >     From: Larry Becraft <becraft@hiwaay. net>
>     >     Subject: [Lex_Rex] Inventor's terminal cancer courtesy of
>     Verichip?
>     >     To: "Tommy Cryer" <CryerLaw@aol. com>, Lex_Rex@yahoogroups .com,
>     >     TheAmericanRepublic @yahoogroups. com
>     >     Date: Sunday, November 29, 2009, 10:40 AM
>     >
>     >
>     >     Secretly implanted Verichip caused cancer in inventor and he
>     may die:
>     >
>     >     http://pesn. com/2009/ 11/28/9501591_ Bob_Boyce_ cancer_by_
>     >     Verichip/
>     >
>        <http://pesn.com/2009/11/28/9501591_Bob_Boyce_cancer_by_Verichip/>
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >     ------------ --------- --------- ------
>     >
>     </mc/compose?to=Lex_Rex-subscribe@yahoogroups.com>>
>     >     Yahoo! Groups Links
>     >
>     >
>     >     (Yahoo! ID required)
>     >
>     </mc/compose?to=Lex_Rex-digest@yahoogroups.com>>
>     >     Lex_Rex-fullfeature d@yahoogroups. com
>     >
>        </mc/compose?to=Lex_Rex-f%21%0A%20ullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
>     </mc/compose?to=20ullfeatured@yahoogroups.com>>
>     >
>     </mc/compose?to=Lex_Rex-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>>
>     >
>     >
>     >
>

And how do you know your livestock didn't have cancer? Did you or the
USDA test them before or after slaughter? "Airtight authority"? The same
authority as when E.coli and other reasons necessitate a recall?

Mike Vanhooser wrote:
> This article is BS. I have been using these chips in livestock for
> nearly 20 years, with no cancers caused by the chips. Also, the chips
> do not radiate any type of RF unless they are being excited by a chip
> reader within a few inches of the chip. So his story of reading EMF is
> also BS. Being an RF engineer I can speak with airtight authority
> about this. This is nothing but a "black helicopter" article with zero
> credibility.
>
>
> --- On *Sun, 11/29/09, Larry Becraft /<becraft@hiwaay. net>/* wrote:
>
>
>     From: Larry Becraft <becraft@hiwaay. net>
>     Subject: [Lex_Rex] Inventor's terminal cancer courtesy of Verichip?
>     To: "Tommy Cryer" <CryerLaw@aol. com>, Lex_Rex@yahoogroups .com,
>     TheAmericanRepublic @yahoogroups. com
>     Date: Sunday, November 29, 2009, 10:40 AM
>
>
>     Secretly implanted Verichip caused cancer in inventor and he may die:
>
>     http://pesn. com/2009/ 11/28/9501591_ Bob_Boyce_ cancer_by_
>     Verichip/
>     <http://pesn.com/2009/11/28/9501591_Bob_Boyce_cancer_by_Verichip/>
>
>
>
>     ------------ --------- --------- ------
>
>     Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>     (Yahoo! ID required)
>
>     Lex_Rex-fullfeature d@yahoogroups. com
>     </mc/compose?to=Lex_Rex-f%21%0A%20ullfeatured@yahoogroups.com>
>
>
>
>

I have begun building a new site, http://www.constitutional-compliance.org , using a courseware management system called Moodle. So far I have only created some course categories. Next I will be adding courses. You may want to bookmark this site and visit it from time to time to take some of the courses. This is also a good time to let me know what courses you would especially like to see.

The level of the courses on this site are for more advanced students. We will probably later have a separate URL for courses for students of public school age, because of the liability issues involved in offering instruction for that audience, which require special measures to control content that some might find objectionable.

-- Jon
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Constitution Society 2900 W Anderson Ln C-200-322, Austin, TX 78757
512/299-5001 www.constitution.org jon.roland@...
-------------------------------------------------------------------

Secretly implanted Verichip caused cancer in inventor and he may die:

http://pesn.com/2009/11/28/9501591_Bob_Boyce_cancer_by_Verichip/

Microeffect Listeners,

  On Saturday afternoon, Nov. 28, between 3 to 5 PM (Eastern), 2 to 4 PM
(Central), 1 to 3 PM (Mountain), Noon to 2 PM (Pacific), Liberty’s
Hammer & Anvil radio show (hosted by Larry Becraft and Tom Cryer) will
broadcast on the Microeffect Radio Network, and you may listen over the
Net here:

  http://www.themicroeffect.com/listenlive.htm

Our guests for Sat’s show will be Rick Wos, Ill. Delegate to the We The
People Continental Congress 2009, recently concluded.

  We would like to hear your own comments about that event and any others
of interest. We invite your calls:

  (208) 935-0094

  Larry Becraft

Right and Left Join Forces on Criminal Justice

WASHINGTON — In the next several months, the Supreme Court will decide at least a half-dozen cases about the rights of people accused of crimes involving drugs, sex and corruption. Civil liberties groups and associations of defense lawyers have lined up on the side of the accused.

But so have conservative, libertarian and business groups. Their briefs and public statements are signs of an emerging consensus on the right that the criminal justice system is an aspect of big government that must be contained.

The development represents a sharp break with tough-on-crime policies associated with the Republican Party since the Nixon administration.

“It’s a remarkable phenomenon,” said Norman L. Reimer, executive director of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. “The left and the right have bent to the point where they are now in agreement on many issues. In the area of criminal justice, the whole idea of less government, less intrusion, less regulation has taken hold.”

Edwin Meese III, who was known as a fervent supporter of law and order as attorney general in the Reagan administration, now spends much of his time criticizing what he calls the astounding number and vagueness of federal criminal laws.

Mr. Meese once referred to the American Civil Liberties Union as part of the “criminals’ lobby.” These days, he said, “in terms of working with the A.C.L.U., if they want to join us, we’re happy to have them.”

Dick Thornburgh, who succeeded Mr. Meese as attorney general under President Ronald Reagan and stayed on under President George Bush, echoed that sentiment in Congressional testimony in July.

“The problem of overcriminalization is truly one of those issues upon which a wide variety of constituencies can agree,” Mr. Thornburgh said. “Witness the broad and strong support from such varied groups as the Heritage Foundation, the Washington Legal Foundation, the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, the A.B.A., the Cato Institute, the Federalist Society and the A.C.L.U.”

In an interview at the Heritage Foundation, a conservative research group where he is a fellow, Mr. Meese said the “liberal ideas of extending the power of the state” were to blame for an out-of-control criminal justice system. “Our tradition has always been,” he said, “to construe criminal laws narrowly to protect people from the power of the state.”

There are, the foundation says, more than 4,400 criminal offenses in the federal code, many of them lacking a requirement that prosecutors prove traditional kinds of criminal intent.

“It’s a violation of federal law to give a false weather report,” Mr. Meese said. “People get put in jail for importing lobsters.”

Such so-called overcriminalization is at the heart of the conservative critique of crime policy. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce made the point in a recent friend-of-the-court brief about a federal law often used to prosecute corporate executives and politicians. The law, which makes it a crime for officials to defraud their employers of “honest services,” is, the brief said, both “unintelligible” and “used to target a staggeringly broad swath of behavior.”

The Supreme Court will hear three cases concerning the honest-services law this term, indicating an exceptional interest in the topic.

Harvey A. Silverglate, a left-wing civil liberties lawyer in Boston, says he has been surprised and delighted by the reception that his new book, “Three Felonies a Day: How the Feds Target the Innocent,” has gotten in conservative circles. (A Heritage Foundation official offered this reporter a copy.)

The book argues that federal criminal law is so comprehensive and vague that all Americans violate it every day, meaning prosecutors can indict anyone at all.

“Libertarians and the civil liberties left have always had some common ground on these issues,” said Radley Balko, a senior editor at Reason, a libertarian magazine. “The more vocal presence of conservatives on overcriminalization issues is really what’s new.”

Several strands of conservatism have merged in objecting to aspects of the criminal justice system. Some conservatives are suspicious of all government power, while others insist that the federal government has been intruding into matters the Constitution reserves to the states.

In January, for instance, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in United States v. Comstock, about whether Congress has the constitutional power to authorize the continued confinement of people convicted of sex crimes after they have completed their criminal sentences.

Then there are conservatives who worry about government seizure of private property said to have been used to facilitate crimes, an issue raised in Alvarez v. Smith, which was argued in October.

“A joint on a yacht, and the whole thing is forfeited,” said Paul Cassell, a law professor at the University of Utah and a former federal judge appointed by President George W. Bush.

Some religious groups object to prison policies that appear to ignore the possibility of rehabilitation and redemption, and fiscal conservatives are concerned about the cost of maintaining the world’s largest prison population.

“Conservatives now recognize the economic consequences of a criminal justice leviathan,” said Erik Luna, a law professor at Washington and Lee University.

The roots of the conservative re-examination of crime policy might also be found in the jurisprudence of Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas. The two justices, joined by liberal colleagues, have said the original meaning of the Constitution required them to rule against the government in, among other areas, the rights of criminal defendants to confront witnesses.

“Scalia and Thomas are vanguards of an understanding by the modern right that its distrust of government extends all the way to the criminal justice system,” said Douglas A. Berman, a law professor at Ohio State University.

The court will hear another confrontation clause case, Briscoe v. Virginia, in January. It is a sequel to a decision in June that prosecutors may not use crime lab reports without live testimony from the analysts who prepared them.

The conservative re-evaluation of crime policy is not universal, of course. Two notable exceptions to the trend, said Timothy Lynch, director of the Cato Institute’s criminal justice project, are Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr.

“Roberts and Alito are coming down consistently on the side of the government in these criminal justice cases,” Mr. Lynch said.

Some scholars are skeptical about conservatives’ timing and motives, noting that their voices are rising during a Democratic administration and amid demands for accountability for the economic crisis.

“The Justice Department now acts as a kind of counterweight to corporate power,” said Frank O. Bowman, a law professor at the University of Missouri. “On the other side is an alliance between two strands of conservative thinking, the libertarian point of view and the corporate wing of the Republican Party.”

Mr. Meese acknowledged that the current climate was not the ideal one for his point of view. “We picked by accident a time,” he said, “when it was not a very popular topic in light of corporate frauds.”

-- -------------------------------------------------------------------
Constitution Society 2900 W Anderson Ln C-200-322, Austin, TX 78757
512/299-5001 www.constitution.org jon.roland@...
-------------------------------------------------------------------

Folks,

Have a great Thanksgiving Day. If you want to do a little legal study
during your spare time, I suggest you go here:

http://uscode.house.gov/download/downloadPDF.shtml

At this site, you can download PDFs of entire titles of the US Code.

Larry

Henry Morgan wrote:

 

---

From: Joe Thornton [mailto:tme@...]
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 4:02 AM
To: henrymorgan@...
Subject: Let your LIGHT!!!!

. . . GUARANTEE . . . that by the time you get done reading this lengthy article, that . . . ALL OF YOU . . . will be . . . 100% . . . absolutely convinced that . . . ALL THE TAX GURUS . . . and . . . ALL THE ATTORNEYS . . . in the . . . TAX HONESTY MOVEMENT . . . are either . . . UNDERCOVER GOVERNMENT AGENTS . . . or . . . IRS SNOOPS . . . or . . . COMPLETE IDIOTS WHO ARE . . . LEGALLY INCOMPETENT!!!!

further . . . GUARANTEE . . . that by the time you get done reading this, . . . ALL OF YOU . . . will be in . . . 100% AGREEMENT WITH ME THAT ALL OF THESE TAX GURUS AND ALL THE WELL KNOWN TAX ATTORNEYS THAT HANG AROUND THE PATRIOT COMMUNITY ALL NEED TO BE PUT OUT OF THE BUSINESS OF GIVING LEGAL ADVICE ON FEDERAL INCOME TAX MATTERS!!!!

Joe Note: The following segments are also included in his 50 page report. He will send this complete report to you if you request it, by allowing me to send him your contact info.

ALL OF YOU ARE USING THE WRONG . . . STATE CONSTITUTIONS!!!!


THE ORIGINAL U.S. CONSTITUTION HAS BEEN SUSPENDED!!!!


THE ORIGINAL U.S. CONSTITUTION IS CURRENTLY BEING HELD IN . . . CUSTODY . . . OF . . . “THE NATIONAL MILITARY ARCHIVES” . . . AS HAS BEEN THEIR EVER SINCE IT WAS FIRST CAPTURED WHEN MARTIAL LAW WAS DECLARED IN 1860.


THE VALID U.S. CONSTITUTION HAS NEVER BEEN AMENDED TO GO PAST THE TWELFTH AMENDMENT!!!!


THE VALID U.S. CONSTITUTION DOES NOT HAVE A 13th, 14th, 15th . . . OR . . . SIXTEENTH AMENDMENT ON IT!!!!


THAT’S RIGHT, . . . THE VALID U.S. CONSTITUTION . . . THAT IS BEING HELD . . . IN CUSTODY . . . BY . . . “THE NATIONAL MILITARY ARCHIVES” . . . DOES NOT HAVE . . . “A SIXTEENTH AMENDMENT” . . . ON IT!!!!


ALL OF YOU ARE USING THE WRONG . . . U.S. U.S. CONSTITUTION!!!!


ALL OF YOU ARE USING THE 1871 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CONSTITUTION!!!!

====================

Yesterday, Edwin Vieira was a guest on Liberty's Hammer and Anvil and
mentioned during that show his latest work on gold clause contracts.
Info about this book is now posted:

http://www.newswithviews.com/Vieira/edwin202.htm

I strongly suggest that people get this book.

Larry

Microeffect Listeners,

On Saturday afternoon, Nov. 21, between 3 to 5 PM (Eastern), 2 to 4 PM
(Central), 1 to 3 PM (Mountain), Noon to 2 PM (Pacific), Liberty’s
Hammer & Anvil radio show (hosted by Larry Becraft and Tom Cryer) will
broadcast on the Microeffect Radio Network, and you may listen over the
Net here:

http://www.themicroeffect.com/listenlive.htm

Our guests for Sat’s show will be Edwin Vieira, author of Pieces of
Eight, the definitive work on the money issue.

We would like to hear your own comments, too. We invite your calls:

(208) 935-0094

Larry Becraft

Microeffect Listeners,

On Saturday afternoon, Nov. 14, between 3 to 5 PM (Eastern), 2 to 4 PM
(Central), 1 to 3 PM (Mountain), Noon to 2 PM (Pacific), Liberty’s
Hammer & Anvil radio show (hosted by Larry Becraft and Tom Cryer) will
broadcast on the Microeffect Radio Network, and you may listen over the
Net here:

http://www.themicroeffect.com/listenlive.htm

Our guests for Sat’s show will be Dane vonBreichenbruchardt of the US
Bill of Rights Foundation in DC, who will give us an update about
damnable federal legislation (he lives up on the Hill trying to get
Liberty accepted). Another guest will be Tom Selgas, who has a money
issue case pending in Texas.

We would like to hear your own comments, too. We invite your calls:

(208) 935-0094

Larry Becraft

CRITICAL ACTION ALERT
AMERICA IN CRISIS

Federal Court Totally Eliminates Free Speech and Right to Defend
(see how)

William J. Benson uncovered a massive government fraud and publicized his findings. The federal government accused him of making false statements.

Benson attempted to defend by submitting evidence of the truth of what he was saying. That evidence consisted of official, certified, government documents he personally obtained by visiting Washington, D.C., and the capitols of all forty-eight states. Unable to contest this evidence, a federal district court judge threw out the evidence and found Benson guilty.

Such conduct is prohibited by the First and Fifth Amendments which preclude the government from:

No. 1 - Acting as invincible tyrants who can censor and punish speech because it proves wholesale government theft; and

No. 2 - Charging someone with illegal conduct and refusing them the right to defend against those charges. 

Benson's case is now before the United States Supreme Court.

We must let government know we will not tolerate being accused of lying about government misconduct and denied the right to prove our innocence. We must protect our right to freedom of speech and we must protect our right to defend in court.

We've made it fast, safe and free to let your voice be heard. Just click here. In a few seconds you can send an e-mail to local and national TV and Radio Stations, to Congress, and sign a petition for Redress of Grievance. 

FightBackNow.US

First they came for the communists, and I did not speak out-because I was not a communist;
Then they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out-because I was not a socialist;
Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out-because I was not a trade unionist;
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out-because I was not a Jew;
Then they came for me-and there was no one left to speak out for me.

--Pastor Martin Niemoller

Lewis,

I do not place much credence in that isolated statement. Judges write
opinions for the purpose of explaining how they reached certain results
and conclusions. If a decision by a Supreme Court, it applies in that
jurisdiction. It has no effect in other jurisdictions. But then again
over time, an opinion containing “dicta” may not be upheld in the
future. That statement about "not being a party to the constitution"
conflicts with other authority. Let me explain.

That statement needs to be examined in the appropriate context. The
Georgia Supreme Court that rendered that decision in 1854 was created by
the Georgia Constitution of 1798, which is posted here:

http://georgiainfo.galileo.usg.edu/con1798.htm

That 1798 constitution was not adopted by the people, but by a committee
of authorized delegates:

"We the underwritten delegates of the people of the State of Georgia,
chosen and authorized by them to revise, alter or amend the powers and
principles of their government, do declare, ordain, and ratify the
several articles and sections contained in the six pages hereunto
prefixed, as the constitution of this State; and the same shall be in
operation from the date hereof."

Thus as a matter of fact, the people and citizens of Georgia had nothing
to do with adoption of that 1798 constitution, which was in effect when
the Padelford decision was rendered. But the later Georgia Constitutions
were adopted via approval of the citizens.

That statement that people/persons/citizens were not parties to that
constitution is thus correct. However, most constitutions adopted over
the last 150 years have been adopted by popular vote of the people. In
this respect, I would say that those voting for a constitution are
“parties” to it.

Here in Alabama, our present constitution was adopted in 1901. It
constitutes a charter creating a state govt and, typical of American
constitutions, it created 3 branches. Constitutions create governmental
institutions. The Alabama legislature was granted law-making power via
our 1901 constitution. As a citizen of Alabama, I guess I could consider
myself a “party” to that Constitution in the sense that I, a later
citizen of Alabama, am the posterity of those previous citizens. But in
reality, I was not even born in 1901, and thus clearly was not a "party".

But all this “patriot” chit-chat about being a party to the constitution
is really irrelevant. Under Alabama law, I can complain when govt
violates the constitution, and I have done so many times, including just
a couple of weeks ago when I drafted a motion to suppress for a friend
of mine who needed one quick. Motions to suppress challenge a search
with an argument that such search violated the Constitution. The same
right to complain about constitutional violations exists at the federal
level as well as all other States in this country. Consequently, based
on legal authority I am not going to catalog here, the statement in the
Padelford case is irrelevant.

Larry



Lewis Mohr wrote:
> Dear Tom, Ken, James, and Terry: This is a very interesting case for 2
> reasons: 1, a man is not a party to the constitutions, and 2, the
> supreme court of Georgia is equal to the US Supreme Court. This is
> real cool news to those who would collect taxes by claiming that the
> 16th amendment gives them the authority to collect a tax. From who?
> The constitutions do not apply to a private person. Therefore
> subdivisions of things created by constitutions do not apply to a
> private person. I suppose the mantra for everyone who receives a
> presentment should be"Show me the contract." Also, could the
> commercial agents of this state claim that the Supreme Court of Texas
> is co-equal to the US Supreme Court, or due to the 1854 year of the
> Padelford case being prior to the Civil War a state can no longer
> assert such a claim due to the fact that we no longer even have a
> functioning de jure constitution. This Padelford case make 2 very
> poignant revelations that should cause all to demand full disclosure
> for where does all of the federal agencies get their authority for
> coming into the states and dictating their policy. Hhmm... Have all of
> the state governors surrendered the sovereignty of the states to a
> commercial foreign power? L -o-
>
> Constitutional Law 92 key 665
> 92 Constitutional Law
> 92VI Enforcement of Constitutional Provisions
> 92VI(A) Persons Entitled to Raise
> Constitutional Questions; Standing
> 92VI(A)1 In General
> 92k665 k. In General. Most Cited Cases
> (Formerly 92k42(2))
> No private person has a right to complain by suit in
> court on the ground of a breach of the United States
> constitution; for, though the constitution is a
> compact, he is not a party to it.
>
>
>
> [7.] The Supreme Court of Georgia is co-equal and
> co-ordinate with the Supreme Court of the U. S.;
> and therefore, the latter cannot give the former an
> order, or make for it a precedent

Microeffect Listeners,

On Saturday afternoon, Oct. 24, between 3 to 5 PM (Eastern), 2 to 4 PM
(Central), 1 to 3 PM (Mountain), Noon to 2 PM (Pacific), Liberty’s
Hammer & Anvil radio show (hosted by Larry Becraft and Tom Cryer) will
broadcast on the Microeffect Radio Network, and you may listen over the
Net here:

http://www.themicroeffect.com/listenlive.htm

Tom is on the road getting ready for Truth Attack Squared, so I will be
the only host. My guests for Sat’s show will be parties involved in a
lawsuit against the FDA raising issues about the swine flu vaccine.

We would like to hear your own comments, too. We invite your calls:

(208) 935-0094

Larry Becraft