Skip to search.
JohnOneOne · John 1:1 - Bible Translations.

Group Information

  • Members: 172
  • Category: Bible Studies
  • Founded: Mar 14, 2002
  • Language: English
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Hear how Yahoo! Groups has changed the lives of others. Take me there.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 1 - 41 of 5532   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
1 arcraig17522 Offline Send Email Mar 14, 2002
3:56 pm
Thank you for joining this group. Hopefully, in being specific about this one, very important verse of the Bible, we can all benefit from the research and...
2 iuvenis_cogitans
iuvenis_cogi... Offline Send Email
Mar 14, 2002
7:34 pm
Hello all, and thanks for starting up this group! I am looking forward to reading the discussions here and possibly participate in some. The reason I am...
3 Bill Ross
no_risk2002 Offline Send Email
Mar 14, 2002
8:45 pm
<Bill> Until recently I saw John 1:1 as referring to Sophia as "a god". More recently I see it thus: "the message was [the exegesis of] God" Though I am not...
4 iuvenis_cogitans
iuvenis_cogi... Offline Send Email
Mar 15, 2002
5:38 pm
Hello, Bill! It is true, as you say, that the rendering "the Logos was God [Himself]" is an inaccurate rendering. John 1:1 mentions two persons, "hO QEOS",...
5 HoDoNy
uziyah Offline Send Email
Mar 15, 2002
11:59 pm
Thank you for your welcome to "JohnOneOne." I look forward to learning the true answer to this controversial scripture. "UziYaH"...
6 SPlayFair Offline Send Email Mar 17, 2002
3:25 pm
The first-born Word who was "God" was next to "the God" (his Creator) in beginning ... [Joe] ... [Shmuel] I understand the first part of the gospel of John...
7 SPlayFair Offline Send Email Mar 17, 2002
3:34 pm
... [Mike] ... [Shmuel] ?? No, of course it means what it says. I'm saying we contrast the anointed human "Lord" or "King" with his Creator, the ultimate...
8 SPlayFair Offline Send Email Mar 17, 2002
3:56 pm
... [Shmuel] No, the Word, the first-born of creation, who was called "God" became flesh; the God Who the Word was next to in beginning did *not* become...
9 Ronald Day
ResLight Offline Send Email
Mar 18, 2002
12:20 am
I thought I might give some points for consideration. EN ARCHEE EEN HO LOGOS KAI HO LOGOS EEN PROS IN BEGINNING WAS THE WORD, AND THE WORD WAS TOWARD 1722 0746...
10 HoDoNy
uziyah Offline Send Email
Mar 18, 2002
12:21 am
... The beauty of "truth" is that it agrees with all scripture. Your statement that "God became flesh" runs headlong into a long list of scriptures such as:...
12 digitalstudio2002
digitalstudi... Offline Send Email
Mar 18, 2002
9:03 pm
Awsome info. For well over 1,500 years before Jesus 'Christ' (Christ means 'one who is annointed' or 'one who has been specially chosen' or 'annointed one')...
13 Bill Ross
no_risk2002 Offline Send Email
Mar 18, 2002
9:13 pm
<David> ... some 'pagan' called Constantine,(who by the way never got baptised till he was on his death bed), that an issue was raised about the identity of...
14 digitalstudio2002
digitalstudi... Offline Send Email
Mar 18, 2002
9:39 pm
The very fact that 'a beginning' is the very part of the description concerning Gods Son, indicates that Christ had a beginning. Remember Col 1:15. ... be the ...
15 arcraig17522 Offline Send Email Mar 19, 2002
12:57 pm
A 1998 publication from England, "The Twenty-first Century New Testament" by Vivian Capel surprised scholars by translating John 1:1 with the words "a god"...
21 arcraig17522 Offline Send Email Mar 19, 2002
4:13 pm
... mention, I am impressed with its accuracy. In "The Complete Bible - An American Translation," the "Word" is rended "divine," as well as in the...
22 Penndragon
penndragonwau Offline Send Email
Mar 19, 2002
6:08 pm
MM Alan As am I actually. There's nothing actually surprising about the translation when you realise that "God"and "a God" would be written exactly the same as...
23 arcraig17522 Offline Send Email Mar 19, 2002
8:12 pm
... translation ... same as ... understanding. ... yourself ... Penn, Yes, in Koine Greek there was no indefinite article, such as our "a." Agape, Alan....
26 Penndragon
penndragonwau Offline Send Email
Mar 20, 2002
3:22 pm
Salàm HoDony It's always good to learn something new. Thanx for being among those who brought a new thing to me ;) I'm one of those who don't see any one way...
28 arcraig17522 Offline Send Email Mar 20, 2002
4:31 pm
... Testament" ... the words ... this work ... version "could be ... words and ... from the ... to find. ... Thanks Jeff,...by the way, did they not mention...
29 arcraig17522 Offline Send Email Mar 20, 2002
4:31 pm
... referred to ... mentioning which ... due, I don't ... this ... out the ... Testament" by ... words "a ... work and ... said "surprised ... scholars that ...
30 arcraig17522 Offline Send Email Mar 20, 2002
4:32 pm
... of "theos" is ... other ... without ... appear there ... in clause ... preceeds the ... Jn. 1:1 ... first "reason"? ... Jeff, Actually, if you re-read my...
31 nancy41
nancy41uk Offline Send Email
Mar 20, 2002
10:40 pm
Alan Please can you confirm something because I am having trouble following your train of thought here. Do you believe the reading should be "God" or "a god"? ...
32 nancy41
nancy41uk Offline Send Email
Mar 20, 2002
11:32 pm
Jeff, I too was suprised that that web site would have only referred to this new work and that 'scholar's were suprised' without mentioning which "scholar's"...
33 arcraig17522 Offline Send Email Mar 20, 2002
11:46 pm
... following your train of thought here. ... you ... Bible - ... as ... different ... with ... third ... appear ... (otherwise, ... many ... in ... also ... ...
34 arcraig17522 Offline Send Email Mar 20, 2002
11:46 pm
... referred ... the ... years (according to macgregorministries.org) ... for "Logos" or "Word"? Do you think that is more accurate? Nancy, Although I have...
37 Jeff Downs
jeffdowns2002 Offline Send Email
Mar 21, 2002
12:23 am
... It did seem that you are saying this when you said, =====QUOTE===== But, the fact that "ho" does not appear with the second use of "theos" is not the only...
38 arcraig17522 Offline Send Email Mar 21, 2002
12:24 am
... referred to this new work and that 'scholar's were suprised' ... Actually Jeff, i believe Nancy41 was replying to my message which part above she did not...
39 arcraig17522 Offline Send Email Mar 21, 2002
12:38 am
... say that, ... of "theos" is ... understanding ... because ... the only) ... don't ... think it is ... other than ... reason as a ... not a good ... ...
40 HoDoNy
uziyah Offline Send Email
Mar 21, 2002
12:39 am
Thank you, Penndragon, for your thought and for sharing Dionysius with me. In other words, "The Tau explained, is not the eternal Tau." I only jostle with...
41 Jeff Downs
jeffdowns2002 Offline Send Email
Mar 21, 2002
12:42 am
... Not sure what you are saying here??? ... Of course. But, can the context be discussed in a group strictly dealing with John 1:1 and various reading? I...
Messages 1 - 41 of 5532   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2010 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines NEW - Help