Having problems with message search?
It is Hegel that created the wisest philosophy so far. Like Heraclites whom his contemporaries called Heraclites the Dark, Hegel deserves to be called Hegel the Dark philosopher of modern times. He is still a Dark Philosopher. His philosophy is still to be understood by its supporters - to understand a philosophy means to be able to develop it. Only when have you truly understood a philosophy, you are able to develop it. Otherwise, you will only chew - like so many other intellectual "cows" - its rich contents withhout being able to develop it genuinely.
One needs a courage of Will and Spirit to develop a philosophy. The rest is just dogmatism. Nothing else but pathetic dogmatism.
As Hegel claims in the very beginning of the third book of his great work "The Science of Logic" that there is no refutation of Spinosism for those who do not acknowledge the freedom and the independence of the self-conscious subject. In much the same manner there is no refutation of Hegel's philosophy for those who think that it is a sacred cow, i.e. it is just unrefutable. It is their problem. There will come times when human beings will easily understand the defects and imperfections of Hegel's philosophy.
Now the task is to use this unused so far wealth, to use this still undiscovered treasure in order to develop the philosophy of neo-humanism - the neo-humanism of the third millennium. You can only sublate a philosophy if you can find a principle which is higher than the principle of the preceeding philosophy. That is the reason why so many university professors and lecturers are not able of sublating Hegel's pilosophy. They can only chew some old forms and some old content but are absolutely incapable of creating a new philosophy.
Now the task is to use this unused so far wealth, to use this still undiscovered treasure in order to develop the philosophy of neo-humanism - the neo-humanism of the third millennium. You can only sublate a philosophy if you can find a principle which is higher than the principle of the preceeding philosophy. That is the reason why so many university professors and lecturers are not able of sublating Hegel's pilosophy. They can only chew some old forms and some old content but are absolutely incapable of creating a new philosophy.
I have written The New Communist Manifesto because I think that nowadays it is philosophers with sound knowledge of the real Science of Philosophy - of Hegelian philosophy, - who can do a great deal of serious theoretcal work in order to change the world for the better. We - disciples of Hegel - know far more about speculative dialectics which dumbs and nuts, such as G.W. Bush,Tony Blair, Gordon Brown etc. know nothing about the result being that they hace been ruining their countries. What they thought was the greatest power of the USA and Great Britain was, in fact, the greatest weakness of these two countries. But you have to be a philosopher to understand that and he was not; in a way, Plato was right that only philosophers can rule a country.
I do believe that the New Communist Manifesto will help mankind to make the world develop in a humanistic way. It is a truly philosophical work. We will make philosophy great again. But a philosophy is great only when it is workable, pragmatic, only if it can exist as an applied science and have practical applications.
I do believe that the New Communist Manifesto will help mankind to make the world develop in a humanistic way. It is a truly philosophical work. We will make philosophy great again. But a philosophy is great only when it is workable, pragmatic, only if it can exist as an applied science and have practical applications.
Read http://www.theneohumanist.net/TheNeoCommunistManifesto/. Create a link to it if you like it!
Anyway, like it or not, it proclaims the nearest future of the political, economic and philosophical development of humanity.
Offline 
Send Email