Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
FamilyRightsAdvocacyIMPROVEMENTProject · FamilyRightsAdvocacy IMPROVEMENT Project
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Real people. Real stories. See how Yahoo! Groups impacts members worldwide.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Alleged cyberstalking at Suzanne Shell   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #3167 of 5168 |
Sockpuppet
Billy tried to add harmful information via his sock-puppet IP
 
Wikipedia was too smart for him and not only called him a vandal but also permanently banned him.
 
Then Billy tried to disguise his sock-puppet
 
Sockmous1
 
But Wikipedia, once again outsmarted his harassing and stalking tactics!
 
 
Jack Davis B Monster Poster
Then, another Monster tried to log in from an sbc account from the California.
Wiki caught it right away!
 
  • 16:11, 9 May 2007 (hist) (diff) m User talk:66.233.207.183 (General note: Vandalism on Suzanne Shell. using TW)
  • 16:11, 9 May 2007 (hist) (diff) m Suzanne Shell (Reverted 2 edits by 66.233.207.183 identified as vandalism to last revision by 65.185.137.147. using

  • Sockbanjo
     
    On top of that, another tried to con, counsel and lure Wikipedia staff into allowing their post from Cambridge Mass using another sock-puppet ID.
     
     
                                                        Donkelphant
     
     
    That didn't work either!  Thanks Wikipedia for your excellent tracking of these harassers!  You really exposed their true colors!  In trying to trumpet their own twisted agenda, they've made jackasses out of themselves!
     
     
    Alleged cyberstalking at Suzanne Shell
     

    69.20.127.250 (talk · contribs · logs · block user · block log), who says she is the subject of the article Suzanne Shell, says she is being followed and harrassed by the holder of the account Wisemanstudios (talk · contribs · logs · block user · block log) in this edit [50] (to the main article page!). Wisemanstudios was warned and blocked for revert-warring and linkspamming in that article a day or two ago, trying to add a link hostile to the article subject to that same article. 69.20.127.250 has apparently gone and directly confronted Wisemanstudios directly on his talk page. Personal attacks are flying, and I have a feeling legal threats are right around the corner. Can a sysop or someone else entitled to the power of the banning bat take this one over? --Dynaflow babble 10:31, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

    The can of worms seems to be opening: User talk:Wisemanstudios#Wisemanstudios is using Wiki to stalk Suzanne Shell. They're probably both going to end up needing to be indef blocked before this is over. [EDIT:] I spoke too soon. These are different users attacking Wisemanstudios on Suzanne Shell's behalf: Dsshell (talk · contribs · logs · block user · block log) and 65.185.137.147 (talk · contribs · logs · block user · block log). Hmmmm... --Dynaflow babble 11:07, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
    Semi-off-topic, but User:Wisemanstudios should probably be blocked under WP:U, since it probably qualifies as a promotional username (referring to Wiseman Music Studios). -Hit bull, win steak(Moo!) 15:28, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
    I reported that username to WP:UAA when I warned him for linkspamming. I assume the admin who reviewed it didn't think warranted blocking on WP:U grounds. --Dynaflow babble 18:28, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
    Ms. Shell has denied editing her own article, and there is an IP claiming to be her: 69.20.127.250. I suspect the latter to be User:Wisemanstudios, given the edit here (read the very last sentence). 65.185.137.147 is claiming to be an associate of Suzanne here. This is turning into a mess... Veinor (talk to me) 16:16, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
    Also see Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Dsshell. Veinor (talk to me) 16:45, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
    That's what I get for skimming. Going by timestamps, it looks like user Dsshell left a complaint at at Wisemanstudios, and then somebody who might be someone's IP sockpuppet copy-and-pasted the complaint, verbatim, into the article, with the added line at the end about attacking 15 year olds. The other IP left a message on its talk page for Venior [51] saying that vandalism to article KPNX is the work of Wiseman studios. The first IP has a lot of vandalizing edits to that article. --Dynaflow babble 17:34, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

    From the checkuser case: Confirmed. Wisemanstudios = 66.233.207.183. Voice-of-All 17:53, 10 May 2007 (UTC) . . . so who the hell is 69.20.127.250? The IP matched with Wiseman studios was doing things like this: [52], which seems to be in character, but that doesn't explain what's up with the other IP. --Dynaflow babble 18:08, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

    That IP was autoblocked eventually as being used by Wiseman: see this. Which presents another conundrum: how was that IP able to edit another IP's talk page and other edits while Wisemanstudios was supposedly blocked (originally on 22:50 May 9)?I am stupid, nowhere does the autoblock say it was that IP. I must be going quackers. Veinor (talk to me) 19:08, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
    69.20.127.250 (talk · contribs · logs · block user · block log) just contacted me at my userpage to express his suspicions about who 69.20.127.250 is -- and then apparently realized his mistake: [53] and then [54]. As Homer Simpson would say, "Doh!" That IP has just pretty much admitted it's an impersonator, and we can presume it's also a sock. Block with prejudice. --Dynaflow babble 19:58, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
    Yup: quacks like a sock. --Dynaflow babble 20:10, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

    Should this thread be copy-pasted to the Talk page of the article in question so, in case this happens again, whoever has to handle it won't have to start from scratch? --Dynaflow babble 21:04, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

    Thank you all for helping Suzanne like this. I have been 65.185.137.147 in this matter beforehand. I have finally created my own login account as MMHen-I had never tried using Wikipedia to a large extent like this before-this was my first foray into this encyclopedic world, and it was to help Suzanne! This guy has been a thorn in our sides for going on two years-there are more than just us he has attacked.MMHen 21:14, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

     




    See what's free at AOL.com.


    Fri May 11, 2007 1:40 pm

    lbe818
    Offline Offline
    Send Email Send Email

    Forward
    Message #3167 of 5168 |
    Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

    Billy tried to add harmful information via his sock-puppet IP Wikipedia was too smart for him and not only called him a vandal but also permanently banned him....
    lbe818@...
    lbe818
    Offline Send Email
    May 11, 2007
    1:41 pm

    Ahh, but Effie. . .the sockpuppet that alleged Greg was one of the vandals did not write in the style of Billy. THAT was written by someone educated and...
    Suzanne Shell
    suzanne.shell
    Offline Send Email
    May 11, 2007
    3:30 pm

    Another reason we need to work together identifying the problem children and putting them in a permanent time-out. They allow each other to take the blame,...
    Kay Henson
    halacha77
    Offline Send Email
    May 12, 2007
    12:22 pm
    Advanced

    Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
    Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help