Thank you for posting this documentation, Christine.

This represents a very distrubing dynamic. Bill Tower and company are feeding misinformation to Billy for him to exploit on their behalf.  They taught him how to do this kind of thing.

You are absolutely right that they are USING Billy to perform the acts they do not want to be held liable for. Is there a crude enough name for anyone who would exploit a VULNERABLE person like they do, a person who is obviously unable to understand most of the stuff he publishes, must less discern who is exploiting and harming him and who isn't? This conduct is so despicable that I am speechless with outrage.

Much of the information they have been feeding to Billy has been found by a court of competent jurisdiction to be libelous of me and Kay. Why would anyone risk republishing the libelous statements when we already have a court determination on our side? Republication of libelous statements is. . . duh . . . libel.  No need to prove falsity . . . it's already done. No need to prove malice. . .it's self evident when you continue to publish after you know it's false. On to damages. . . What would you say it cost YOU in revenue for your seminar, Christine? What were your LOSSES and EXPENSES as a result of this kind of conduct. . .Kay recovered her losses and expenses from Brenda - so did I. :-) I know what MY lost income was for this. . . and I obviously know how to win this kind of lawsuit.  Something to think about. . .



Christine Korn wrote:

I have stated several times that the STM gang was trying to
sabotage the training seminars being held all over the country. They
deny this adamantly and claim that Suzanne is sabotaging THEM.I
hesitated to post the information I have because I hoped they would
have the good grace, when I SAID I had it, to realize that it would
expose them. Sadly, it appears that nuances are lost on this
obsessive compulsive group.
I sponsored a conference in Castle Rock, CO on June 30 and July
1. The following is a letter from Billy Wiseman to the director of
the library where we used the meeting room for our conference, and a
reply from the director. When I got wind of this attempt to harm us,
I contacted the library for confirmation. I was amazed at the total
lack of grip this letter appears to have. I keep asking WHY?
Where on EARTH Billy got the idea that we were presenting this
seminar under the name of Family Rights RADIO is beyond me. Our
promotional flyers and programs as well as my website (the one he
cites in his letter to the library) CLEARLY said, "Family Rights
Advocacy Institute, the education and training division of Families
First Partnership, Inc." Hell, I even posted the EIN Number for the
IRS. Any moron could run that number and find out that it does,
indeed, belong to FFP. Can someone tell me where it says anything
about Billy's RADIO endeavor on my site or on the flyers and posters?
AND FFP has a 501(c)(3) of it's own. There was nothing clandestine or
scamming about this sponsored and successful training conference. As
I have shown you all in previous posts to this group, there WAS
no "raking in the bucks" done by Suzanne, me or anyone. In fact I
LOST money, as usual, and so did Suzanne! It isn't possible to charge
the amount that we would have to charge to break close to even. The
investment was worth it, we gained some very heavy allies through
this forum, and THAT is the goal, always. Trained Attorneys tend to
fight harder and smarter. Trained parents tend to DEMAND better
representation. Trained CASA and GALs have a much clearer view of
their leverage in a case.
As you can see below, Billy was working on shedding negative
light, trying to get our seminar kicked out of the library, or maybe
to prevent us from using that facility again. This is a clear attempt
to sabotage our work, the results of which benefit every single
person who has a stake in this movement. SO exactly who is it that is
the BAD GUY here??? HMMMM??? Can he produce proof of anything CLOSE
to this sort of sabotage coming FROM FRAI? I can answer that, with a
resounding NO. Not one of the people affiliated with us would EVER
stoop so low. If he is actively attempting to PREVENT the education
and promotion of good attorney representation for parents, then it
stands to reason that he must WANT parents to LOSE.
Or maybe the blind hatred he (and the people who are hiding
behind his disability) feels for Suzanne (who has incidentlly done
nothing to him, his mentors have AGAIN misled him) has caused him to
value destroying HER even if it means destroying the considerable
advances she continues to make for ALL parents. Maybe he would be
glad to let a few more kids steep in horror in foster care rather
than concede that he and his mentors have made a HUGE mistake, and
are WRONG. Hmmmm? In the end, the question is, what the hell did I do
to Billy to deserve this direct attack on ME? I remain convinced that
Billy is being fed faulty, intentionally inflammatory information in
the effort to prod HIM into doing the outrageous things that THEY
would like to have done, but don't want to be held accountable for. I
find it particularly despicable that hatred could drive any person to
the levels of dishonesty and usury manipulation that these people
continue to exhibit. HERE, my friends, is the PROOF of the sabotage
attempt perpetrated on ME:
(I have redacted the names in the hope that this poor person won't be
harrassed further.)

----------------------------------------------------
This mailbox protected from junk email by MailFrontier Desktop
from MailFrontier, Inc. http://info.mailfrontier.com

----- Original Message -----
From: "XXXXXXXX" <XXXXX@...>
To: "billy wiseman" <president@nextfriend.us>; "XXXXXXXX"
<pXXXXXX@lXXibraries.org>
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 1:30 PM
Subject: your questions about the library

> Dear Sir:
>
> I am XXXXXXXXX, director of the XXXXXXXXX County Libraries. I
wanted to briefly respond to some of your questions.
>
> You wrote:
> "Mrs.XXXXXXX,
> on your July 2006 XXXXXXXXX Meeting Room Schedule 830A- 500P
> Family. Rights - Castle Rock Bank Room West,there are three points
that
> i like to ask you...
> 11. All meetings must be free of charge to the public, unless the
> library manager has granted
> specific permission to charge a fee for supplies, services or non?
profit
> fundraising." Has This group Family. Rights Requested specific
> permission to charge a fee?"
>
> A: Yes. They first used our facilities last year, and when they
asked for a repeat of those arrangements, we granted it. We have
offered this arrangement to several groups over the years, typically
to offset costs for a speaker, or meals.
>
> "7. Permission to use facilities does not constitute endorsement by
the
> library. No advertisement or announcement implying such endorsement
> will be permitted.
> Now if This is True why is it That the seminar was posted on the
website
> with the XXXXXXXXXXXX Meeting Room Blessing? The Quest for
Reasonable Efforts June 30 and July 1, 2006 XXXXXXXXXXXXXLibrary- 100
XXXXXXXXXX
> Castle Rock, Colorado,and in order to go to the meeting its not
FREE As
> you haft to pay as high as $180.00 dollars for something your giving
> these people Free? would The Libary Care To Comment On This?
>
http://www.coloradofrai.org/Castle_Rock1/Castle_Rock2/Castle_Rock3/cas
tle_rock3.html"
>
> A: Certainly. Our website lists ALL the meetings scheduled at our
large meeting rooms -- both those programs we have scheduled, or the
programs scheduled by anybody else. This information is offered as a
public service. We did not advertise this group in any way, merely
record that it had been booked. The only meetings we sponsor are the
ones we plan ourselves.
>
>
> "6. Non?profit groups may be asked to provide a copy of their IRS
Form
> 501(c) (3), their
> Articles of Incorporation or a Tax Exempt Certificate. has this
group
> provided a copy of their IRS Form 501(c) (3), "
>
> A: No, we didn't ask for it. We aren't required to; it's just
something we reserve the right to do if we believe there may be
problems.
>
> Mr. Wiseman, I gather that you're in some kind of dispute with
Family Rights Radio. But they haven't broken any of our rules. Do you
know something we don't?
>
>
> --
> XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
> Work: XXX-XXX-XXXX
>
> "Free speech means the right to shout 'theatre' in a crowded
fire." - Abbie Hoffman

__________________________________________________________
In a message dated 7/3/06 3:00:14 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
president@nextfriend.us writes:
XXXXXXXXXXX
Dear Mr.XXXXXXXXX

Yea I Gess I Do Know Something You Dont :+} Family Rights Radio
http://familyrightsradio.us is owned by Me Check Out http://whois.org/
and see for yourself and i dont have a 501 (c) 3 nor do i plan on
getting one..and http://familyrightsradio.com and
http://familyrightsradio.org is owned by Tom Rogers and the domains
were bought about the same time and im sure tom Rogers didnt get a 501
(c) 3 That Fast and these people i gess are useing the name Family
Rights Radio and they dont own them and tom rogers lives in utah and i
live in oregon...i never said the Douglas County Libraries was say?
You
said "Certainly. Our website lists ALL the meetings scheduled at our
large meeting rooms " No Problem i dont have a problem with this my
problem is if you would look at the website below you will see that
they called it The Quest for Reasonable Efforts and the 501 (c) 3 you
might want to check into because They are running a scam on you..
http://www.coloradofrai.org/Castle_Rock1/Castle_Rock2/castle_rock2.htm
l
http://www.coloradofrai.org/Castle_Rock1/Castle_Rock2/Castle_Rock3/cas
tle_rock3.html

You Said I gather that you're in some kind of dispute with Family
Rights
Radio. But they haven't broken any of our rules. Do you know something
we don't well" what i do know can be found on another website i own
and
its called the truth is still told..check it out
http://thetruthistold.com/ shell tryed to shut me down and i had to
get
an attorney and a few other people to help me get it back up.....
Family
Rights Radio does not have a 501 (c) 3 and i own one of them..and if
thats what your being told you have a scam going on.if there is
something you dont understand ask me what it might be...Sincerely
Billy. Aka william wiseman

__________________________________________________________

I remain uncertain as to what Billy wanted from this man. I remain
baffled as to how he got the idea that the Quest for Reasonable
Efforts was in any way claimed to be connected to Family Rights
Radio. I remain lost about how we "scammed" the library, or used
a "fake 501c3" or how listing us on the calendar of events for the
county constituted advertising for us. I remain lost about how we
have done anything to harm Billy or his cohorts (clearly this is NOT
just Billy's war!) egregiously enough to warrant subterfuge of this
caliber.
Sadly, it appears that Billy is so blinded by the slingers, he can't
see the trees.
Christine.