Skip to search.

Breaking News Visit Yahoo! News for the latest.

×Close this window

Electronics_101 · Electronics Learning Group

The Yahoo! Groups Product Blog

Check it out!

Group Information

  • Members: 6267
  • Category: Electronics
  • Founded: Mar 6, 2001
  • Language: English
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Hear how Yahoo! Groups has changed the lives of others. Take me there.

Messages

Advanced
Messages Help
Messages 5938 - 5967 of 82178   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Show Message Summaries Sort by Date ^  
#5938 From: "integrodev" <integrodev@...>
Date: Fri Aug 1, 2003 8:00 am
Subject: Re: SMD Components
integrodev
Send Email Send Email
 
Thank you a lot Manifold :)

Best regards,
Refa

--- In Electronics_101@yahoogroups.com, "manifold" <manifold_1@y...>
wrote:
> You do not need paste to hand solder a SMD. Solder paste is used in
> the manufacture of PCB's. The paste is silk screened on to the
> component pads where each component is placed. Then the entire
board
> goes through a special heat cycle that melts all the solder at once.
>
> Hand rework of SMD board just requires a good iron, a steady hand
and
> lots of practice. Here are some tips that I find useful:
>
> Use a fine gauge solder and a temperature controlled soldering
iron.
> Do not use a super fine or super long soldering iron tip. It takes
> too long for heat to move through them. Use a small (1/16" - 1/8")
> blunt screwdriver tip instead. Use sturdy tweezers to hold the
parts.
> Use the back, sticky side, of a post-it(tm) note to keep parts from
> blowing off your work space.
>
> Here is a quick procedure:
> Put a tiny bit of solder on the PCB pad of the component to be
> soldered. Position the part and heat the pad and component lead so
> that it "tacks" the component down at one lead position. Now solder
> all the other leads. Go back and clean up the "tack" joint made
> earlier.
>
> Once you get the hang of it it's a lot easier and faster than
> soldering leaded parts. Of course there are a lot more parts on
> boards now too.
>
> --- In Electronics_101@yahoogroups.com, "integrodev"
> <integrodev@y...> wrote:
> > Dear group,
> > I have a question for those who work with SMD components.
Probably
> > many of you use hot air soldering stations but what do you do if
> you
> > have just old irons. I heard a paste exists and you put it and
> after
> > some minutes it leads current normaly? Can anybody tell me how
much
> > these pastes cost and where I can find them? Give me some
solutions
> > how your solder senstive SMDs. Thank you
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Refa

#5939 From: miktrain@...
Date: Fri Aug 1, 2003 10:34 am
Subject: Re: Re: Video Editing
tmiktrain
Send Email Send Email
 
Yes, but it is a little complicated. You have to detect the pulses during the blanking period as this is where the protection is applied. The contrast and brightness signals are dependent on the a part of this blanking, the protection mucks this up. They are therefore fluctuating because the video recorders AGC can't keep up with the changes. I have seen a circuit in an electronics magazine here in Australia if you are interested in building it.
Tony
 
Well thank  you for your input.  That's unfortunate =(

Is there any way to get around that?

#5940 From: "ghidera2000" <ghidera2000@...>
Date: Fri Aug 1, 2003 1:23 pm
Subject: Re: PCB design - good practices?
ghidera2000
Send Email Send Email
 
Well, there are things you can do with the circuit itself that may
be more important than the physical layout of your board.

Some considerations are:
Voltage, current, and frequency.

If your circuit uses only <12v, has only IC components and no high
frequency on it, you can lay things out pretty close to any way you
damn well please and it won't make any difference.

Fat traces are needed for higher currents but you'd probably be
amazed at just how many amps a skinny little trace can handle. Check
the net for trace width calculators.

Wide traces are much more important for high frequency circuits
because of the way electrons behave under high frequency. They tend
to stay away from the inner portions of the copper and travel around
the outer layers - effectively making your trace much smaller.
Wider/thicker traces are required.

Frequency also dictates spacing of traces. You don't want a low
power analog trace running beside a high-frequency trace because it
will introduce a lot of noise to the analog portion. Remember,
traces are basically little radio antannae. The electric current
sets up magnetic fields around every trace - if the current changes,
so do the magnetic fields and you induce currents into nearby
traces. In low frequency digital circuits, this induced noise isn't
very critical but if you use analog circuits they can make the whole
thing useless.

The convention is to have each layer's traces run perpendicular to
the other. Top layer left/right and bottom up/down. This is
generally easier for laying out but it also has a practical side. An
analog trace crossing a digital one at right angles will pick up
very little noise compared to running parallel to one another.

Digital chips tend to use power in bursts. For example, a PCF8574
not being used consumes a miniscule amount of power. As soon you
communicate with it the power consumption jumps to a couple
milliamps. This sudden change in current will cause the radio-
transmitter effect as described above. If you put a bypass capacitor
between the power and ground pins (as close to the chip as possible)
the capacitor then supplies this current instead of your voltage
regulator. Only the trace between the cap and the chip has large
changes in current, making a short radio transmitter. Current
changes between the cap and the voltage regulator are much smaller,
making for a far weaker transmitter. This also helps smooth out
noise on the power leg of your circuit.

Another goal for layout is separate electron paths back to the
ground leg of your regulator. Each device on a ground trace will
introduce noise into that trace. The noise can affect how the
devices operate. Again, digital is far more tolerant than analog but
digital also generates a lot more noise. Its pretty well mandatory
that you use seperate ground traces for digital and analog
components. While daisy chaining digital device grounds is usually
no problem, analog devices are a lot more finicky. Where possible,
give each one its own trace back to the regulator. Which brings us
to the next topic:

Ground planes help a LOT in ground noise. It does so in two ways:

1) Since electrons flow like water - taking the path of least
resistance, a ground plane effectively separates the ground current
for each device, reducing the impact of each chip on the others.

2) It absorbs RF interferance - reducing induced noise in the
circuit.


--- In Electronics_101@yahoogroups.com, "c45a6" <clone45@h...> wrote:
>
> Hello!  I'm fairly new to doing PCB designs, and I'm working on a
> little circuit board that I may someday sell.  I'm using
ExpressPCB
> to manufacture the boards.
>
> My question is, what are some rules of thumb to follow when
designing
> a PCB?  For instance, I found out that I should avoid right angles
on
> skinny traces, and that I should use wide (greater than .05 in)
> traces for power and ground.
>
> I've noticed that other PCBs have large ground squares where
there's
> room.  Is that good practice?
>
> Is it best to put most of your traces on the top or bottom layer?
>
> Thanks a ton!
> - Bret

#5941 From: "Vijay Raju" <vijayxraju@...>
Date: Fri Aug 1, 2003 2:03 pm
Subject: 230V AC as i/p to a uC
vijayxraju
Send Email Send Email
 

Hi,

 

            I am using the ckt in the attachment to detect 230V AC arriving on an output of an industrial PLC. I am trying to step down the voltage to 5V so my microcontroller can recognize the presence or absence of 230V. Now the problem is that the ckt seems to hold charge for really long times. i.e. if I remove the 230V input for a couple of minutes the output of the MCT2E is low. The second problem is that the output of the MCT2E is varying only between 4 and 5V. i.e 4V at 230V and 5V at 0V. What could be causing these problems?

 

 

Regards,   

 

                     ,,,

                    (@-@)

        +==---o00----(_)----00o-----==+

        {                             |

        {        Thoughts from        |

        {         Vijay  Raju         |

        {                             |

        +==-------------------------==+

                   |__|__|

                    || ||

                   ooO Ooo

 


 



#5942 From: "Charles Douvier" <charles@...>
Date: Fri Aug 1, 2003 2:44 pm
Subject: PCB Programs
intellstat
Send Email Send Email
 
Has anyone seen any good Freeware PCB Design, I was using AutoTrax EDA but
it's auto router sucks and making anything is horrid. I also had used that
Express PCB but you can only send it into Express PCB to get made..

Anyone have something they think is real easy?

#5943 From: "ahren julian" <ahrenadoptie811@...>
Date: Fri Aug 1, 2003 3:50 pm
Subject: Re: PCB Programs
vechol2000
Send Email Send Email
 

try www.cadsoftusa.com maby you can something that you`re looking for.

>From: "Charles Douvier"
>Reply-To: Electronics_101@yahoogroups.com
>To:
>Subject: [Electronics_101] PCB Programs
>Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 08:44:05 -0600
>


Hotmail en Messenger on the move MSN Mobiel
Has anyone seen any good Freeware PCB Design, I was using AutoTrax EDA but
it's auto router sucks and making anything is horrid. I also had used that
Express PCB but you can only send it into Express PCB to get made..

Anyone have something they think is real easy?




To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Electronics_101-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

#5944 From: "seawhillow" <seawhillow@...>
Date: Fri Aug 1, 2003 4:33 pm
Subject: Re: Video Editing
seawhillow
Send Email Send Email
 
rofl, I don't think I'm up to that but thank you nonetheless Tony.

> Yes, but it is a little complicated. You have to detect the pulses
during the blanking period as this is where the protection is
applied. The contrast and brightness signals are dependent on the a
part of this blanking, the protection mucks this up. They are
therefore fluctuating because the video recorders AGC can't keep up
with the changes. I have seen a circuit in an electronics magazine
here in Australia if you are interested in building it.
> Tony
>
>   Well thank  you for your input.  That's unfortunate =(
>
>   Is there any way to get around that?

#5945 From: "Scott Thompson" <blueelectron9@...>
Date: Fri Aug 1, 2003 5:01 pm
Subject: RE: 230V AC as i/p to a uC
blueelectron9
Send Email Send Email
 
The 470uF capacitor is holding a lot of charge on the LED.  The optocoupler has what is called a current transfer ratio (CTR), so the LED is biased slightly on at all tiimes because of the charge of C17 and the output is reflecting the current fluctuation in the GaAs LED (U2).  Also, the 1N4001's are only rated at 50PIV and they may conduct during a portion of the cycle due to the charge of the 0.33uF capacitor.
 
You only need about 2V @ 10 mA to drive the LED.  At 230VAC, you have ~325V peak.  Take (325-2)/10 mA=R=33k.
 
Therefore, your circuit would like like this:
 
On JR2.1, replace the 100R 2W resistor with the 33k ohm resistor.  The resistor should be rated at about 5W.  You can use a 2W resistor since the input is always changing.  If you want to use lower power valued resistors, you can make a capacitive voltage divider first.  The problem with a capacitive voltage divider is that if bottom capacitor opens, you will be left with the full voltage anyway, so it's probably better to just be prepared to handle what may come down the pipe.
 
Kill the 1M resistor and C19.  Replace the diodes with 1N4004s or 1N4005s.  Kill the 470uF capacitor.
 
Place PD2 on an INPUT pin of the microcontroller instead of an OUTPUT pin.  You may damage your microcontroller if you are are forcing an output to change state.
 
Your circuit should now work properly.  Note that when the voltage on the line goes above about 1.7V, the output will go LOW (0V).  The output will swing high when the LED is not on (i.e., most of the AC cycle).  Therefore, expect to see a very narrow pulse from +5V to 0V around the rising zero-crossing level of the input voltage.
 
You may wish to include a zener or something in place of the first 1N4001 in case of a power surge.
 
For further information on interfacing to AC power lines (and a very simple one resistor approach), see Microchip's website and look at their application notes.  They rely on the maximum current into the microcontroller pin and the fact that there is intrinsic diodes to the power line rails to determine a value of resistance that will limit the input current to something that the microcontroller can handle.  All of the excess voltage just gets dumped across the very high valued resistor.
 
Personally, I'd stick with the optocoupler.
 
Good luck,
Scotty
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Vijay Raju
Sent: 8/1/03 7:04:25 AM
Subject: [Electronics_101] 230V AC as i/p to a uC

Hi,

 

            I am using the ckt in the attachment to detect 230V AC arriving on an output of an industrial PLC. I am trying to step down the voltage to 5V so my microcontroller can recognize the presence or absence of 230V. Now the problem is that the ckt seems to hold charge for really long times. i.e. if I remove the 230V input for a couple of minutes the output of the MCT2E is low. The second problem is that the output of the MCT2E is varying only between 4 and 5V. i.e 4V at 230V and 5V at 0V. What could be causing these problems?

 

 

Regards,   

 

                     ,,,

                    (@-@)

        +==---o00----(_)----00o-----==+

        {                             |

        {        Thoughts from        |

        {         Vijay  Raju         |

        {                             |

        +==-------------------------==+

                   |__|__|

                    || ||

                   ooO Ooo

 


 




To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Electronics_101-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

#5946 From: "Scott Thompson" <blueelectron9@...>
Date: Fri Aug 1, 2003 5:06 pm
Subject: RE: Isolation problem
blueelectron9
Send Email Send Email
 
The 555 is good for making the sawtooth.  I like to turn on a MOSFET to charge a capacitor which is discharged by a constant-current source (you may need a negative supply voltage to properly bias the constant-current source if you want 0V output compliance).  When the MOSFET is off, it presents a high impedance to the capacitor and the capacitor discharges through the constant-current source, but when the MOSFET is on, it provides enough current to charge the capacitor and to handle the current required from the constant-current source.
 
The result is a very linear sawtooth.  With just a capacitor, the circuit looks like an exponential decay rather than a pure sawtooth.
 
Best,
Scotty
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: 7/30/03 6:00:03 PM
Subject: [Electronics_101] Isolation problem

Thanks Scotty, you are absolutely right. I have sort
of a 'MacGyver' like kind of problem. I have to use
the equipment available to me in my lab at the
university. I am actually trying to build an ion
detector known as a Langmuir probe. I am using a
single probe that is biased with a 1 Hz +-50V
sawtooth.
I do have a 4 channel 2GS/s 8 bit digitizing HP
O'scope available. So far I was using the time base
mode, but I can use the differential mode also.
I do not have the sawtooth oscillator built so far. I
was initially thinking of building a square wave
generator with a 555 connected to a capacitor to get
the sawtooth. However, now I am thinking of using a
regular Function Generator signal input through an
optocoupler to an amplifier of some sort to get +-50V,
so that the ground can be isolated.
The nA can be translated to 100s of mV range, since
the O'scope can safely detect down to 1mV. I am
thinking this way, I won't introduce too much noise
from bigger resistors in the opamp ckts. I am not too
good with advanced electronics, so I have to read up
on what chopper stabilized power supply means. I am
thinking it has got something to do with switch mode
power supplies.
Thanks for your help. It is helping me learn things
that I would never have seen in the text books.
Philip


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com


To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Electronics_101-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

#5947 From: James Liddle <jliddle31@...>
Date: Fri Aug 1, 2003 5:12 pm
Subject: Re: Re: Video Editing
jliddle31
Send Email Send Email
 
Have you confirmed that it's a copy-guard problem by trying to copy a tape that you've recorded - either off-air or from a camera?
 
Jim


seawhillow <seawhillow@...> wrote:
rofl, I don't think I'm up to that but thank you nonetheless Tony.

> Yes, but it is a little complicated. You have to detect the pulses
during the blanking period as this is where the protection is
applied. The contrast and brightness signals are dependent on the a
part of this blanking, the protection mucks this up. They are
therefore fluctuating because the video recorders AGC can't keep up
with the changes. I have seen a circuit in an electronics magazine
here in Australia if you are interested in building it.
> Tony
>
>   Well thank  you for your input.  That's unfortunate =(
>
>   Is there any way to get around that?



To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Electronics_101-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software

#5948 From: "Vijay Raju" <vijayxraju@...>
Date: Sat Aug 2, 2003 4:54 am
Subject: RE: 230V AC as i/p to a uC
vijayxraju
Send Email Send Email
 

Hi,

 

Thanks! Initially I was trying to do the same thing trying to drop the voltage across a large resistor. But things were getting hot and ugly. The idea here is to use the reactance of the cap to drop the voltage. In fact I got this idea from a microchip app note (www.microchip.com/download/appnote/pic16/91008b.pdf)

 

I have a good amount of time about 500 ms to detect a change over. I just want to know how to get the time constant right.

 

 

Regards,

 

                     ,,,

                    (@-@)

        +==---o00----(_)----00o-----==+

        {                             |

        {        Thoughts from        |

        {         Vijay  Raju         |

        {                             |

        +==-------------------------==+

                   |__|__|

                    || ||

                   ooO Ooo

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Thompson [mailto:blueelectron9@...]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:32 PM
To: Electronics_101@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Electronics_101] 230V AC as i/p to a uC

 

The 470uF capacitor is holding a lot of charge on the LED.  The optocoupler has what is called a current transfer ratio (CTR), so the LED is biased slightly on at all tiimes because of the charge of C17 and the output is reflecting the current fluctuation in the GaAs LED (U2).  Also, the 1N4001's are only rated at 50PIV and they may conduct during a portion of the cycle due to the charge of the 0.33uF capacitor.

 

You only need about 2V @ 10 mA to drive the LED.  At 230VAC, you have ~325V peak.  Take (325-2)/10 mA=R=33k.

 

Therefore, your circuit would like like this:

 

On JR2.1, replace the 100R 2W resistor with the 33k ohm resistor.  The resistor should be rated at about 5W.  You can use a 2W resistor since the input is always changing.  If you want to use lower power valued resistors, you can make a capacitive voltage divider first.  The problem with a capacitive voltage divider is that if bottom capacitor opens, you will be left with the full voltage anyway, so it's probably better to just be prepared to handle what may come down the pipe.

 

Kill the 1M resistor and C19.  Replace the diodes with 1N4004s or 1N4005s.  Kill the 470uF capacitor.

 

Place PD2 on an INPUT pin of the microcontroller instead of an OUTPUT pin.  You may damage your microcontroller if you are are forcing an output to change state.

 

Your circuit should now work properly.  Note that when the voltage on the line goes above about 1.7V, the output will go LOW (0V).  The output will swing high when the LED is not on (i.e., most of the AC cycle).  Therefore, expect to see a very narrow pulse from +5V to 0V around the rising zero-crossing level of the input voltage.

 

You may wish to include a zener or something in place of the first 1N4001 in case of a power surge.

 

For further information on interfacing to AC power lines (and a very simple one resistor approach), see Microchip's website and look at their application notes.  They rely on the maximum current into the microcontroller pin and the fact that there is intrinsic diodes to the power line rails to determine a value of resistance that will limit the input current to something that the microcontroller can handle.  All of the excess voltage just gets dumped across the very high valued resistor.

 

Personally, I'd stick with the optocoupler.

 

Good luck,

Scotty

 

----- Original Message -----

From: Vijay Raju

Sent: 8/1/03 7:04:25 AM

Subject: [Electronics_101] 230V AC as i/p to a uC

 

Hi,

 

         I am using the ckt in the attachment to detect 230V AC arriving on an output of an industrial PLC. I am trying to step down the voltage to 5V so my microcontroller can recognize the presence or absence of 230V. Now the problem is that the ckt seems to hold charge for really long times. i.e. if I remove the 230V input for a couple of minutes the output of the MCT2E is low. The second problem is that the output of the MCT2E is varying only between 4 and 5V. i.e 4V at 230V and 5V at 0V. What could be causing these problems?

 

 

Regards,  

 

                    ,,,

                    (@-@)

        +==---o00----(_)----00o-----==+

        {                             |

        {        Thoughts from        |

        {         Vijay  Raju         |

        {                             |

        +==-------------------------==+

                   |__|__|

                    || ||

                   ooO Ooo

 


 

 



To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Electronics_101-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Electronics_101-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



#5949 From: "Paul_Lav" <paul_lav@...>
Date: Sat Aug 2, 2003 10:40 am
Subject: Storing EEPROM of a PIC onto a PC
paul_lav
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi,
 
We have a control board at work. It is a microproceossor. There is a RS232 connector on the board to download/upload EEPROM values. They are stored in a .txt file on the PC. How would i go about doing this for a pic microcontroller?
 
Thanks,
Paul
 

#5950 From: Albert van Mil <a.mil@...>
Date: Sat Aug 2, 2003 12:10 pm
Subject: Re: PCB Programs
albert007nl
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi,

  you can also try "Eagle", they have a freeware program for schematic
and pcb design
(for private use) or you can subscribe for a small donation to get the
professional version.
There is a Windows and Linux version available. See   www.cadsoft.de for
all info.

                 Cheers Albert.



Charles Douvier wrote:

> Has anyone seen any good Freeware PCB Design, I was using AutoTrax EDA but
> it's auto router sucks and making anything is horrid. I also had used that
> Express PCB but you can only send it into Express PCB to get made..
>
> Anyone have something they think is real easy?
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ADVERTISEMENT
> click here
>
<http://rd.yahoo.com/M=259538.3625325.4914071.1261774/D=egroupweb/S=1706058037:H\
M/A=1695348/R=0/SIG=11u38u3s2/*http://hits.411web.com/cgi-bin/hit?page=1374-1059\
51838331032>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Electronics_101-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
> <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.

#5951 From: "rtstofer" <rstofer@...>
Date: Sat Aug 2, 2003 2:34 pm
Subject: Re: Storing EEPROM of a PIC onto a PC
rtstofer
Send Email Send Email
 
There are a few steps depending on the PC end of the job.

First write the PIC code to read/write EEPROM

Second, write the PIC code to read/write USART.  Select baud rate,
data format, etc.

Third, develop a command structure such that the PIC knows what the
PC expects it to do.  Could be as simple as W<addr><value><CR> or
R<addr><CR> to write and read eeprom.  Write the PIC code to
implement the command structure calling the EEPROM and USART code as
required.

Assuming the PIC is busy doing better things, the USART code and
command code will probably need to be interrupt driven.  It may turn
out that the interrupt routine validates the command sentence and
sets up a flag for the command routine to deal with the received data.

You will also have to handle the issue of a data stream arriving
faster than the PIC can handle.  One way is with echo - the sending
party doesn't send a future char until the present char has been
echoed.

Fourth, develop a PC program using whatever tools you have to send
the commands and retrieve the results, storing them in a file.

Your message from the PIC to the PC may want to include some version
of the original command so that the PC can verify that it got the
data it asked for.  Maybe the return message is D<addr><value><CR>.

If you are REALLY concerned about the data then maybe a checksum is
added to all messages like: W<addr><data><checksum><CR> or
R<addr><checksum><CR> or D<addr><data><checksum><CR>.

That's pretty much it.

--- In Electronics_101@yahoogroups.com, "Paul_Lav" <paul_lav@y...>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have a control board at work. It is a microproceossor. There is
a RS232 connector on the board to download/upload EEPROM values. They
are stored in a .txt file on the PC. How would i go about doing this
for a pic microcontroller?
>
> Thanks,
> Paul

#5952 From: "alishamshad2000" <alishamshad2000@...>
Date: Sat Aug 2, 2003 4:57 pm
Subject: Frequency Devider IC not working over 2 MHz in a frequency Counter
alishamshad2000
Send Email Send Email
 
I have made a frequency Counter.. in which I have used a Frequency
devider IC # HC7496 TTL IC  which stops working when the frequency
goes above 2 MHz Range.. Have some one any Idea why????????

Help is required urgently

Ali Shamshad
Pakistan

#5953 From: "Paul" <pwaiting@...>
Date: Sun Aug 3, 2003 5:40 am
Subject: Elusive Parts
pwaiting
Send Email Send Email
 
Looking for these parts in small qty from a distributor in the
U.S.A.:

Circuit board "Vero" style (39 copper strips x 62 holes per strip)

ICL7673 (battery backup watchdog chip)

NEC 431000 32 pin, 1MBit, 8 bit, low power CMOS SRAM chip
or
628128 (made by Hitachi)
or
K6T1008C2E (made by Samsung)
or comparable 1MBit sram

Regards,
Paul

#5954 From: "Paul_Lav" <paul_lav@...>
Date: Sun Aug 3, 2003 11:20 am
Subject: Re: Re: Storing EEPROM of a PIC onto a PC
paul_lav
Send Email Send Email
 
Mmmmmmmmmm, sounds very complicated! But i shall give it a bash sometime!
 
Many thanks,
Paul
----- Original Message -----
From: rtstofer
Sent: Saturday, August 02, 2003 3:34 PM
Subject: [Electronics_101] Re: Storing EEPROM of a PIC onto a PC


There are a few steps depending on the PC end of the job.

First write the PIC code to read/write EEPROM

Second, write the PIC code to read/write USART.  Select baud rate,
data format, etc.

Third, develop a command structure such that the PIC knows what the
PC expects it to do.  Could be as simple as W<addr><value><CR> or
R<addr><CR> to write and read eeprom.  Write the PIC code to
implement the command structure calling the EEPROM and USART code as
required.

Assuming the PIC is busy doing better things, the USART code and
command code will probably need to be interrupt driven.  It may turn
out that the interrupt routine validates the command sentence and
sets up a flag for the command routine to deal with the received data.

You will also have to handle the issue of a data stream arriving
faster than the PIC can handle.  One way is with echo - the sending
party doesn't send a future char until the present char has been
echoed.

Fourth, develop a PC program using whatever tools you have to send
the commands and retrieve the results, storing them in a file.

Your message from the PIC to the PC may want to include some version
of the original command so that the PC can verify that it got the
data it asked for.  Maybe the return message is D<addr><value><CR>.

If you are REALLY concerned about the data then maybe a checksum is
added to all messages like: W<addr><data><checksum><CR> or
R<addr><checksum><CR> or D<addr><data><checksum><CR>.

That's pretty much it.

--- In Electronics_101@yahoogroups.com, "Paul_Lav" <paul_lav@y...>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have a control board at work. It is a microproceossor. There is
a RS232 connector on the board to download/upload EEPROM values. They
are stored in a .txt file on the PC. How would i go about doing this
for a pic microcontroller?
>
> Thanks,
> Paul



To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Electronics_101-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

#5955 From: "csakima" <csakima@...>
Date: Sun Aug 3, 2003 4:05 pm
Subject: Doing it in software Was: 230V AC as i/p to a uC
electronicho...
Send Email Send Email
 
I'm wondering why no-one is simply hooking up the Opto-Isolator to the AC mains WITHOUT the whole rectifying and filtering ordeal.   Have a dropping device and a reverse parallel diode across the LED.    And simply use retriggerable-monostable-multivibrator software in the PIC.   That would totally eliminate the whole mess of the "filter cap holding a charge" and all that.
 
Just a thought.
 
Also, has anyone thought of using a NEON bulb / PhotoTransistor Pair??
 
Curtis
 
Get your free newsletter at
http://www.ezinfocenter.com/3122155/NL
----- Original Message -----
From: Vijay Raju
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 11:54 PM
Subject: RE: [Electronics_101] 230V AC as i/p to a uC

Hi,

 

Thanks! Initially I was trying to do the same thing trying to drop the voltage across a large resistor. But things were getting hot and ugly. The idea here is to use the reactance of the cap to drop the voltage. In fact I got this idea from a microchip app note (www.microchip.com/download/appnote/pic16/91008b.pdf)

 

I have a good amount of time about 500 ms to detect a change over. I just want to know how to get the time constant right.

 

 

Regards,

 

                     ,,,

                    (@-@)

        +==---o00----(_)----00o-----==+

        {                             |

        {        Thoughts from        |

        {         Vijay  Raju         |

        {                             |

        +==-------------------------==+

                   |__|__|

                    || ||

                   ooO Ooo


#5956 From: "Manoj Cherukat" <manojc@...>
Date: Sun Aug 3, 2003 12:01 pm
Subject: Re: Frequency Devider IC not working over 2 MHz in a frequency Counter
cjonam
Send Email Send Email
 
did u look up the data sheet of the ic?
manoj
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, August 02, 2003 10:27 PM
Subject: [Electronics_101] Frequency Devider IC not working over 2 MHz in a frequency Counter

I have made a frequency Counter.. in which I have used a Frequency
devider IC # HC7496 TTL IC  which stops working when the frequency
goes above 2 MHz Range.. Have some one any Idea why????????

Help is required urgently

Ali Shamshad
Pakistan



To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Electronics_101-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

#5957 From: ali shamshad <alishamshad2000@...>
Date: Mon Aug 4, 2003 1:12 pm
Subject: Re: Frequency Devider IC not working over 2 MHz in a frequency Counter
alishamshad2000
Send Email Send Email
 
thank you for reply .i dont have data sheet ,send me if you or any one have and another
IC   LM3364K

Manoj Cherukat <manojc@...> wrote:
did u look up the data sheet of the ic?
manoj
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, August 02, 2003 10:27 PM
Subject: [Electronics_101] Frequency Devider IC not working over 2 MHz in a frequency Counter

I have made a frequency Counter.. in which I have used a Frequency
devider IC # HC7496 TTL IC  which stops working when the frequency
goes above 2 MHz Range.. Have some one any Idea why????????

Help is required urgently

Ali Shamshad
Pakistan



To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Electronics_101-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Electronics_101-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software

#5958 From: "MAG" <nereus@...>
Date: Mon Aug 4, 2003 3:42 pm
Subject: Re: Transformers
lovebrazil2002
Send Email Send Email
 
On the subject of transformers.
Does anyone know where I could find a matrix of the various types of
transformers and their functions?
I know of power transformers. But what about inverter transformers? How many
different kinds of  transformer are there?

MAG

#5959 From: "Manoj Cherukat" <manojc@...>
Date: Mon Aug 4, 2003 4:03 pm
Subject: Re: Frequency Devider IC not working over 2 MHz in a frequency Counter
cjonam
Send Email Send Email
 
Try a google search....i am having data sheet of another ic (counter) 74393
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 6:42 PM
Subject: Re: [Electronics_101] Frequency Devider IC not working over 2 MHz in a frequency Counter

thank you for reply .i dont have data sheet ,send me if you or any one have and another
IC   LM3364K

Manoj Cherukat <manojc@...> wrote:
did u look up the data sheet of the ic?
manoj
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, August 02, 2003 10:27 PM
Subject: [Electronics_101] Frequency Devider IC not working over 2 MHz in a frequency Counter

I have made a frequency Counter.. in which I have used a Frequency
devider IC # HC7496 TTL IC  which stops working when the frequency
goes above 2 MHz Range.. Have some one any Idea why????????

Help is required urgently

Ali Shamshad
Pakistan



To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Electronics_101-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Electronics_101-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Electronics_101-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

#5960 From: "vk6vhf28" <ronb28@...>
Date: Tue Aug 5, 2003 1:24 am
Subject: philips cd 960 cd player circuit
vk6vhf28
Send Email Send Email
 
hi all
          looking for a circuit diagram for my philips CD 960 cd
player ! havebeen having problem with the cd draw for some time and
now it wont open at all !would be pleased to hear from anyone who
has any ideas
regards ron

  ronb28@...

#5961 From: "manifold" <manifold_1@...>
Date: Tue Aug 5, 2003 4:08 am
Subject: Re: Transformers
manifold_1
Send Email Send Email
 
Hmm, that questions is a little like asking how many different kinds
of circuits there are.

If by inverter transformers you mean those that are used in
Uniterruptable Power Systems (UPS) then there are a few different
types but they are similar to a very tightly coupled AC mains
transformer that is operated backwards. They are designed to the
specifications of the manufacturer and are not general purpose
devices.

If you mean DC-DC switching transformers then there are very many
different types depending on the needs of the circuit and the
parameters to be optimized.

Here is a short list of parameters that you might want to optimize
during design:
  o cost
  o efficiency
  o input supply voltage range (80V to 800V anyone)
  o short circuit current
  o operating temperature

When designing transformers it is common to work closly with the
company that will be producing the transformer for you. You call them
and tell them your requirements and they send you a sample to test.
You might take it apart and rewind it or tweak it a bit and then get
another sample until it just fits your requirements then you test the
heck out of it and maybe you specify it in your final design. This
works very well for high volume manufacturing solutions.

You can get off the shelf transformers that have six equal windings
and by connecting the windings in series or parallel you can get good
results for certain applications. This is the most generic approach I
have seen to switching transfomers.

There are many other types of transformers such as current
transformers, regulating tranformers, RF transformers etc.

--- In Electronics_101@yahoogroups.com, "MAG" <nereus@l...> wrote:
> On the subject of transformers.
> Does anyone know where I could find a matrix of the various types of
> transformers and their functions?
> I know of power transformers. But what about inverter transformers?
How many
> different kinds of  transformer are there?
>
> MAG

#5962 From: Brian Hoskins <BrianJHoskins@...>
Date: Tue Aug 5, 2003 7:15 am
Subject: Re: philips cd 960 cd player circuit
brianjhoskins
Send Email Send Email
 
Hello vk6vhf28

On 05-Aug-03, you wrote:

> hi all
>         looking for a circuit diagram for my philips CD 960 cd
> player ! havebeen having problem with the cd draw for some time and
> now it wont open at all !would be pleased to hear from anyone who
> has any ideas
> regards ron
>
> ronb28@...

Hmmmm I wonder if we ever actually sold that model.  I'll take a look when I
get to work today for you ok? Check back here later :)




-----
Brian J Hoskins
South Wales, UK

Email: BrianJHoskins@...
Mobile: 07967 240380

Amiga 040/PPC, Amiga OS3.9.
-----

#5963 From: James Liddle <jliddle31@...>
Date: Tue Aug 5, 2003 2:58 pm
Subject: Re: philips cd 960 cd player circuit
jliddle31
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi Ron -
 
On most CD & DVD players there is a small hole near the release buttton.  Poke it with a small paper clip and you'll mechanically release the drawer.
 
Best regardss,
 
Jim


vk6vhf28 <ronb28@...> wrote:
hi all
         looking for a circuit diagram for my philips CD 960 cd
player ! havebeen having problem with the cd draw for some time and
now it wont open at all !would be pleased to hear from anyone who
has any ideas
regards ron

ronb28@...



To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Electronics_101-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software

#5964 From: "ghidera2000" <ghidera2000@...>
Date: Tue Aug 5, 2003 3:30 pm
Subject: 1N581X EEEP!
ghidera2000
Send Email Send Email
 
I was just playing around with my Wart/battery supply stuff and
discovered that the schottky diodes aren't acting as I expected.

With a 1N4148 reverse biased using 14VDC, I measure about 5 mV
coming out. With the 1N15818/5819, I measure the full 14 volts!
Granted, the current is down to 0.006mA but it still worries me. If
I apply 14V to a 9V or AA 4pack of alkalines, won't the 14V end up
destroying them after a while, even at 6uV?

If so, is there a little heftier low drop diode that I could use to
isolate batteries from wart power that has a low voltage drop?

My current project is now down to 13mA avg with bursts of 20mA so
the 1N4148 is plenty (70mA max), but I might get heftier things
going later.

#5965 From: ali shamshad <alishamshad2000@...>
Date: Tue Aug 5, 2003 4:09 pm
Subject: Re: Re: Transformers
alishamshad2000
Send Email Send Email
 
dear mag
as you know  transformer is a name of atwo alphabet
trans  and former
 
 
there are many kinde
1   power transformer as you said
ALLtransforme work in power
time is short  kontect  me again i try to satisafy you completly

MAG <nereus@...> wrote:
On the subject of transformers.
Does anyone know where I could find a matrix of the various types of
transformers and their functions?
I know of power transformers. But what about inverter transformers? How many
different kinds of  transformer are there?

MAG



To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Electronics_101-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software

#5966 From: Skip <skip@...>
Date: Tue Aug 5, 2003 5:13 pm
Subject: Re: Re: Transformers
skipleeds
Send Email Send Email
 
I would also be interested in hearing more about specialty transformers --
structurally different transformers used for particular purposes.

But some of the "types"  we're talking about here are, as MAG suggested,
more about applications than actual physical differences in transformers.

    Power transformers are just transformers wound to step voltages  up or
down, sometimes with multiple taps to allow different output input and
output voltages. Of course, they also step current up and down
proportionally, so that the First Law of Thermodynamics doesn't get rudely
violated ;)

Output transformers and coupling transformers are used to match impedances
between devices or between segments of a circuit -- a very important
function, to be sure. The ratio of impedances is equal to the square of the
turns ratio, so that's what determines what kind of transformer is used in
this situation.

Transformers also provide isolation, obviously, since they can pass current
from a source to a circuit without an actual conducting connection.

I'm an audio person, so that's about all I use transformers for...I'm sure
there are many other applications...,

BTW, from an audio point of view, much has been made of the physical
characteristics of transformers as they pertain to sound reproduction. What
kind of core the transformer has, whether it was wound on a paper bobbin or
a plastic one, whether the windings are staggered or not, etc.  Some of
this is the stuff of lore, but it does seem to be true that frequency
response is affected by the arhcitecture and composition of the core.

Skip

Skip








At 04:08 AM 8/5/2003 +0000, you wrote:
>Hmm, that questions is a little like asking how many different kinds
>of circuits there are.
>
>If by inverter transformers you mean those that are used in
>Uniterruptable Power Systems (UPS) then there are a few different
>types but they are similar to a very tightly coupled AC mains
>transformer that is operated backwards. They are designed to the
>specifications of the manufacturer and are not general purpose
>devices.
>
>If you mean DC-DC switching transformers then there are very many
>different types depending on the needs of the circuit and the
>parameters to be optimized.
>
>Here is a short list of parameters that you might want to optimize
>during design:
>  o cost
>  o efficiency
>  o input supply voltage range (80V to 800V anyone)
>  o short circuit current
>  o operating temperature
>
>When designing transformers it is common to work closly with the
>company that will be producing the transformer for you. You call them
>and tell them your requirements and they send you a sample to test.
>You might take it apart and rewind it or tweak it a bit and then get
>another sample until it just fits your requirements then you test the
>heck out of it and maybe you specify it in your final design. This
>works very well for high volume manufacturing solutions.
>
>You can get off the shelf transformers that have six equal windings
>and by connecting the windings in series or parallel you can get good
>results for certain applications. This is the most generic approach I
>have seen to switching transfomers.
>
>There are many other types of transformers such as current
>transformers, regulating tranformers, RF transformers etc.
>
>--- In Electronics_101@yahoogroups.com, "MAG" <nereus@l...> wrote:
> > On the subject of transformers.
> > Does anyone know where I could find a matrix of the various types of
> > transformers and their functions?
> > I know of power transformers. But what about inverter transformers?
>How many
> > different kinds of  transformer are there?
> >
> > MAG
>
>
>
>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>Electronics_101-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

#5967 From: "Scott Thompson" <blueelectron9@...>
Date: Tue Aug 5, 2003 10:27 pm
Subject: RE: 230V AC as i/p to a uC
blueelectron9
Send Email Send Email
 
If you're using a 60Hz system, the capacitive reactance of the 0.33 uF capacitor is 1/(2*pi*60*0.33e-6)=8 kOhms.  For 50 Hz, it's 9.65 kOhms.  Things get a bit more complicated with the 470uF capacitor due to its time constant.  The GaAs LED limits the voltage on the capacitor to about 2V during the positive cycles.  Since you will want about 10-15 mA during the positive peaks, you need a total impedance of
(325-2)/10mA=33 kOhms.
 
Having C17, the 470uF capacitor, in the circuit, is doing you no good.  It slowly gets charged up to the on voltage of the GaAs LED and discharges through this LED when the circuit would normally be off.  If you need to avoid false triggers or something, we'll talk later.  So, please remove C17 or replace it with something much smaller, like 0.47uF.
 
Since capacitors drop the voltage without dissipating heat (first order stuff here, I'm not taking a lot into consideration), it should be the dominant (or only) series component before the diodes.  You can make the 100R resistor a 1k ohm resistor and reduce the power dissipation in it significantly (10mA^2*1kOhms=100mW--you can use a 1/4-watt resistor).
 
You need a residual impedance of about 31.3 kOhms.  You could use a 0.1 uF series capacitor, which gives you slightly more current, in place of the 0.33 uF capacitor.  You can keep the 1M Ohm resistor if you like, it will discharge the capacitor should you unplug the device.
 
The circuit is now JR2-1 into 1k-1.  1k-2 goes to 0.1uF-1 and 0.1uF-2 goes to *1N4004* diodes.
 
Be sure to change the diodes to either 1N4004 or 1N4005 and rate the 0.1uF capacitor at least 400WVDC.  You can probably keep the 1N4001s because of the voltage drops across the resistors, but since you're dealing with very high voltages, if you can change them, then I would recommend using rated components for the possible line voltages that may appear.  For example, when you are charging the capacitor, the full voltage will momentarily appear across the diode.  Since it is only rated at 50WVDC, it will conduct in its reverse zener region.  The current is limited, so it's probably no big deal, but I do suggest at least 1N4004s which are rated at 400WVDC.
 
Remember that the output will go LOW at some point when the input goes HIGH (towards 325 V) when the input LED is biased on with enough current to cause the output transistor to turn on.
 
That was a good article from Microchip.  The cost savings are substantial when one doesn't use a transformer, but the dangers of using line-powered equipment are outrageous :)  I'm glad you're using an optocoupler.
 
Have fun!
Scotty
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Vijay Raju
Sent: 8/1/03 9:54:39 PM
Subject: RE: [Electronics_101] 230V AC as i/p to a uC

Hi,

 

Thanks! Initially I was trying to do the same thing trying to drop the voltage across a large resistor. But things were getting hot and ugly. The idea here is to use the reactance of the cap to drop the voltage. In fact I got this idea from a microchip app note (www.microchip.com/download/appnote/pic16/91008b.pdf)

 

I have a good amount of time about 500 ms to detect a change over. I just want to know how to get the time constant right.

 

 

Regards,

 

                     ,,,

                    (@-@)

        +==---o00----(_)----00o-----==+

        {                             |

        {        Thoughts from        |

        {         Vijay  Raju         |

        {                             |

        +==-------------------------==+

                   |__|__|

                    || ||

                   ooO Ooo

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Thompson [mailto:blueelectron9@...]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:32 PM
To: Electronics_101@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Electronics_101] 230V AC as i/p to a uC

 

The 470uF capacitor is holding a lot of charge on the LED.  The optocoupler has what is called a current transfer ratio (CTR), so the LED is biased slightly on at all tiimes because of the charge of C17 and the output is reflecting the current fluctuation in the GaAs LED (U2).  Also, the 1N4001's are only rated at 50PIV and they may conduct during a portion of the cycle due to the charge of the 0.33uF capacitor.

 

You only need about 2V @ 10 mA to drive the LED.  At 230VAC, you have ~325V peak.  Take (325-2)/10 mA=R=33k.

 

Therefore, your circuit would like like this:

 

On JR2.1, replace the 100R 2W resistor with the 33k ohm resistor.  The resistor should be rated at about 5W.  You can use a 2W resistor since the input is always changing.  If you want to use lower power valued resistors, you can make a capacitive voltage divider first.  The problem with a capacitive voltage divider is that if bottom capacitor opens, you will be left with the full voltage anyway, so it's probably better to just be prepared to handle what may come down the pipe.

 

Kill the 1M resistor and C19.  Replace the diodes with 1N4004s or 1N4005s.  Kill the 470uF capacitor.

 

Place PD2 on an INPUT pin of the microcontroller instead of an OUTPUT pin.  You may damage your microcontroller if you are are forcing an output to change state.

 

Your circuit should now work properly.  Note that when the voltage on the line goes above about 1.7V, the output will go LOW (0V).  The output will swing high when the LED is not on (i.e., most of the AC cycle).  Therefore, expect to see a very narrow pulse from +5V to 0V around the rising zero-crossing level of the input voltage.

 

You may wish to include a zener or something in place of the first 1N4001 in case of a power surge.

 

For further information on interfacing to AC power lines (and a very simple one resistor approach), see Microchip's website and look at their application notes.  They rely on the maximum current into the microcontroller pin and the fact that there is intrinsic diodes to the power line rails to determine a value of resistance that will limit the input current to something that the microcontroller can handle.  All of the excess voltage just gets dumped across the very high valued resistor.

 

Personally, I'd stick with the optocoupler.

 

Good luck,

Scotty

 

----- Original Message -----

From: Vijay Raju

Sent: 8/1/03 7:04:25 AM

Subject: [Electronics_101] 230V AC as i/p to a uC

 

Hi,

 

         I am using the ckt in the attachment to detect 230V AC arriving on an output of an industrial PLC. I am trying to step down the voltage to 5V so my microcontroller can recognize the presence or absence of 230V. Now the problem is that the ckt seems to hold charge for really long times. i.e. if I remove the 230V input for a couple of minutes the output of the MCT2E is low. The second problem is that the output of the MCT2E is varying only between 4 and 5V. i.e 4V at 230V and 5V at 0V. What could be causing these problems?

 

 

Regards,  

 

                    ,,,

                    (@-@)

        +==---o00----(_)----00o-----==+

        {                             |

        {        Thoughts from        |

        {         Vijay  Raju         |

        {                             |

        +==-------------------------==+

                   |__|__|

                    || ||

                   ooO Ooo

 


 

 



To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Electronics_101-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Electronics_101-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.




To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Electronics_101-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Messages 5938 - 5967 of 82178   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2010 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines NEW - Help