This group is for global citizens who think we need - more (and better) globalization, not less. - democratic global institutions, where gradually all world citizens bedirectlyrepresented.
=> "directly" means no interferences from nations, not
the old "international"institutions where bargaining between states,
not democracy, was the key.
Nation-states, corporate oligopolies, militant NGOs,
sects and mafias should not go on confiscating the global power for their parochial interests.
It is a long term goal. But we can start by shaping proposals for a limited number of
democratic global institutions in charge of a few crucial fields of
common interest. They might federate
later into a full-fledged democratic world government.
I've not seen a radical shift towards global governance,but I do see a hint of cooperation developing.The G-20 nations have agreed to provide $1.1 trillion to
Yes, the World Bank does have a reputation for being arrogant and ignorant and prefering grand strategy to ground truth. I've read that many of it's own staff
Hi, Jean Well, if I see the success of the European Investment Bank, (which loutstanding loans now amounts twice those in the WB balance sheet) there is a need
No, I don't think so. It's unique that presidents and PMs are attending the meeting because of the financial crisis but I'm not sure if much has really