Apparently this was within the infamous 'Fred and Barney meet the Thing' - 'Fred
and Barney meet the Shmoo' period, circa 1979.

  We must have watched the Thing cartoon, then changed the channel when the
Flintstones anything started up.

Fred and Barney never met the Thing in the cartoons, they may have exchanged
dialogue during some bumper or something.

A year after Herbie? I didnt know it was that soon, tho I think the FF cartoon
didn't run a full year before it ws yanked.

--- In DC_Comics_Uncensored@yahoogroups.com, Leonard Blunk <lionineone@...>
wrote:
>
> Sorry I missed this show. Perhaps it will turn up on the net sometime.
>                                           LEN
>
> --- On Tue, 6/30/09, Richard J. <richard.fuller1@...> wrote:
>
>
> From: Richard J. <richard.fuller1@...>
> Subject: [DCU] Re: Cathy Lee Cosby as Wonder woman from Youtube
> To: DC_Comics_Uncensored@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Tuesday, June 30, 2009, 2:33 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> After Herbie?
>
> Thing Ring was pure gold.
>
> The deal was Ben Grimm could turn human, but he would be a teen ager. The
scientist who perfected this had two daughters, one a teen ager and the other a
pre-teen.
>
> The precocious pre-teen knew Grimm's secret, that he was actually the Thing.
>
> When he turned into the teen ager, he became awkward picked on Benji.
>
> One episode actually dealt with him finding a cure to be full grown Ben Grimm
again. Don't recall what happened there.
>
> The adventures were George Reeves-Superman like. Virtually no bad guys with
superpowers or anything.
>
> Mr. T-type cartoon here I suspect.
>
> He fought bullies, cheaters on tests, runaway vehicles with damaged brakes and
so on.
>
> Again, after Herbie?
>
> But it actually was rather fanciful, I think it would have been fun even
without having seen Herbie.
>
> --- In DC_Comics_Uncensore d@yahoogroups. com, Leonard Blunk <lionineone@ ...>
wrote:
> Groan! Herbie the robot!
>
>   The Thing show I missed completely! Was it any good?
> >   Doesn't sound like it. "Thing ring do your thing?" LOL Speak of
nightmares!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

Wow, I forgot to explain the catchphrase.

Benji wore two rings, one on each hand.

When danger was around, such as the carjackers, shoplifters or dognappers, Benji
would bring the two rings together like the Wonder Twins in Superfriends, and he
would declare "Thing ring, do your thing!" and transform into the full grown
Thing.

--- In DC_Comics_Uncensored@yahoogroups.com, Leonard Blunk <lionineone@...>
wrote:
>
> Sorry I missed this show. Perhaps it will turn up on the net sometime.
>                                           LEN
>
> --- On Tue, 6/30/09, Richard J. <richard.fuller1@...> wrote:
>
>
> From: Richard J. <richard.fuller1@...>
> Subject: [DCU] Re: Cathy Lee Cosby as Wonder woman from Youtube
> To: DC_Comics_Uncensored@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Tuesday, June 30, 2009, 2:33 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> After Herbie?
>
> Thing Ring was pure gold.
>
> The deal was Ben Grimm could turn human, but he would be a teen ager. The
scientist who perfected this had two daughters, one a teen ager and the other a
pre-teen.
>
> The precocious pre-teen knew Grimm's secret, that he was actually the Thing.
>
> When he turned into the teen ager, he became awkward picked on Benji.
>
> One episode actually dealt with him finding a cure to be full grown Ben Grimm
again. Don't recall what happened there.
>
> The adventures were George Reeves-Superman like. Virtually no bad guys with
superpowers or anything.
>
> Mr. T-type cartoon here I suspect.
>
> He fought bullies, cheaters on tests, runaway vehicles with damaged brakes and
so on.
>
> Again, after Herbie?
>
> But it actually was rather fanciful, I think it would have been fun even
without having seen Herbie.
>
> --- In DC_Comics_Uncensore d@yahoogroups. com, Leonard Blunk <lionineone@ ...>
wrote:
> Groan! Herbie the robot!
>
>   The Thing show I missed completely! Was it any good?
> >   Doesn't sound like it. "Thing ring do your thing?" LOL Speak of
nightmares!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

And this actually sold to TV? Who at Marvel would approve such a show?
  Okay, for someone who has no idea of the Thing's origins and place in the
Marvel Universe---it might work. But I can see True Believers the world over
tuning this one out!
  Even the Bixby/Ferringo HULK was better than that.
  The actor I felt for was the guy who played the Thing in the FF films. Can you
imagine wearing that outfit under kleg lights and just having to walk around in
it? Good way to melt off any body fat though! LOL
                                           LEN

--- On Wed, 7/1/09, Richard J. <richard.fuller1@...> wrote:


From: Richard J. <richard.fuller1@...>
Subject: [DCU] Re: Thing/Herbie
To: DC_Comics_Uncensored@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday, July 1, 2009, 1:57 AM








Wow, I forgot to explain the catchphrase.

Benji wore two rings, one on each hand.

When danger was around, such as the carjackers, shoplifters or dognappers, Benji
would bring the two rings together like the Wonder Twins in Superfriends, and he
would declare "Thing ring, do your thing!" and transform into the full grown
Thing.

--- In DC_Comics_Uncensore d@yahoogroups. com, Leonard Blunk <lionineone@ ...>
wrote:
>
> Sorry I missed this show. Perhaps it will turn up on the net sometime.
>                                           LEN
>
> --- On Tue, 6/30/09, Richard J. <richard.fuller1@ ...> wrote:
>
>
> From: Richard J. <richard.fuller1@ ...>
> Subject: [DCU] Re: Cathy Lee Cosby as Wonder woman from Youtube
> To: DC_Comics_Uncensore d@yahoogroups. com
> Date: Tuesday, June 30, 2009, 2:33 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> After Herbie?
>
> Thing Ring was pure gold.
>
> The deal was Ben Grimm could turn human, but he would be a teen ager. The
scientist who perfected this had two daughters, one a teen ager and the other a
pre-teen.
>
> The precocious pre-teen knew Grimm's secret, that he was actually the Thing.
>
> When he turned into the teen ager, he became awkward picked on Benji.
>
> One episode actually dealt with him finding a cure to be full grown Ben Grimm
again. Don't recall what happened there.
>
> The adventures were George Reeves-Superman like. Virtually no bad guys with
superpowers or anything.
>
> Mr. T-type cartoon here I suspect.
>
> He fought bullies, cheaters on tests, runaway vehicles with damaged brakes and
so on.
>
> Again, after Herbie?
>
> But it actually was rather fanciful, I think it would have been fun even
without having seen Herbie.
>
> --- In DC_Comics_Uncensore d@yahoogroups. com, Leonard Blunk <lionineone@ ...>
wrote:
> Groan! Herbie the robot!
>
>   The Thing show I missed completely! Was it any good?
> >   Doesn't sound like it. "Thing ring do your thing?" LOL Speak of
nightmares!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>



















[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Whoever sold that premise, should have read the Fantastic Four, and closely.
The Thing's condition was permanent, as were the others.
Jonathan Michael Reiter
jmr
   ----- Original Message -----
   From: Leonard Blunk
   To: DC_Comics_Uncensored@yahoogroups.com
   Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 3:32 AM
   Subject: Re: [DCU] Re: Thing/Herbie





   And this actually sold to TV? Who at Marvel would approve such a show?
     Okay, for someone who has no idea of the Thing's origins and place in the
Marvel Universe---it might work. But I can see True Believers the world over
tuning this one out!
     Even the Bixby/Ferringo HULK was better than that.
     The actor I felt for was the guy who played the Thing in the FF films. Can
you imagine wearing that outfit under kleg lights and just having to walk around
in it? Good way to melt off any body fat though! LOL
                                              LEN

   --- On Wed, 7/1/09, Richard J. <richard.fuller1@...> wrote:

   From: Richard J. <richard.fuller1@...>
   Subject: [DCU] Re: Thing/Herbie
   To: DC_Comics_Uncensored@yahoogroups.com
   Date: Wednesday, July 1, 2009, 1:57 AM

   Wow, I forgot to explain the catchphrase.

   Benji wore two rings, one on each hand.

   When danger was around, such as the carjackers, shoplifters or dognappers,
Benji would bring the two rings together like the Wonder Twins in Superfriends,
and he would declare "Thing ring, do your thing!" and transform into the full
grown Thing.

   --- In DC_Comics_Uncensore d@yahoogroups. com, Leonard Blunk <lionineone@ ...>
wrote:
   >
   > Sorry I missed this show. Perhaps it will turn up on the net sometime.
   >                                           LEN
   >
   > --- On Tue, 6/30/09, Richard J. <richard.fuller1@ ...> wrote:
   >
   >
   > From: Richard J. <richard.fuller1@ ...>
   > Subject: [DCU] Re: Cathy Lee Cosby as Wonder woman from Youtube
   > To: DC_Comics_Uncensore d@yahoogroups. com
   > Date: Tuesday, June 30, 2009, 2:33 PM
   >
   >
   >
   >
   >
   >
   >
   >
   > After Herbie?
   >
   > Thing Ring was pure gold.
   >
   > The deal was Ben Grimm could turn human, but he would be a teen ager. The
scientist who perfected this had two daughters, one a teen ager and the other a
pre-teen.
   >
   > The precocious pre-teen knew Grimm's secret, that he was actually the Thing.
   >
   > When he turned into the teen ager, he became awkward picked on Benji.
   >
   > One episode actually dealt with him finding a cure to be full grown Ben
Grimm again. Don't recall what happened there.
   >
   > The adventures were George Reeves-Superman like. Virtually no bad guys with
superpowers or anything.
   >
   > Mr. T-type cartoon here I suspect.
   >
   > He fought bullies, cheaters on tests, runaway vehicles with damaged brakes
and so on.
   >
   > Again, after Herbie?
   >
   > But it actually was rather fanciful, I think it would have been fun even
without having seen Herbie.
   >
   > --- In DC_Comics_Uncensore d@yahoogroups. com, Leonard Blunk <lionineone@
...> wrote:
   > Groan! Herbie the robot!
   >
   >   The Thing show I missed completely! Was it any good?
   > >   Doesn't sound like it. "Thing ring do your thing?" LOL Speak of
nightmares!
   >
   >
   >
   >
   >
   >
   >
   >
   >
   >
   >
   >
   >
   >
   >
   >
   >
   >
   >
   > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
   >

   [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

As I said, after Herbie, even tho by then I was a pre-teen and should have been
too old for cartoons, I felt I was open to anything.

The Thing could have been in outer space, the Thing could have been underwater,
we could have had the Thing team (Captain Ben Grimm, Thingra, Dr. Thingster and
Thingie, the dog) and I wouldn't have cared.

And Michael Chiklis of some show I never watched was the Thing. Didn't he appear
pretty well into the first movie as a human?

And get transformed back briefly in the second movie?

HIs fiancee, who is Asian, wouldn't go near him when he was in the costume, he
said in an article.

I hope they are married by now.

He also played Curly Howard in the Three Stooges telemovie, who suffered the
stroke and brother Moe had to take control of his likeness and left Curly
sobbing in the wheelchair.

Worth noting, the voice of the Thing in the first FF cartoon in '68 was the same
voice behind Boris Badenov and the Burgermeister Meisterburger from Santa Claus
is Coming To Town, Paul Frees was his name I believe.

Didnt know this, but the Thing with Herbie the robot in the '78 cartoon was Ted
Cassidy, aka Lurch from the Addams Family.

Also worth noting, Ted Cassidy is the narrator heard at the beginning of the
Bixby-Ferrigno Hulk show AND he provided the monster's growls in the show.

He also did the growls for Godzilla in the late seventies Saturday morning
Godzilla cartoon, with Godzookie, about one of the last things he did.

--- In DC_Comics_Uncensored@yahoogroups.com, Leonard Blunk <lionineone@...>
wrote:
>
> And this actually sold to TV? Who at Marvel would approve such a show?
>   Okay, for someone who has no idea of the Thing's origins and place in the
Marvel Universe---it might work. But I can see True Believers the world over
tuning this one out!
>   Even the Bixby/Ferringo HULK was better than that.
>   The actor I felt for was the guy who played the Thing in the FF films. Can
you imagine wearing that outfit under kleg lights and just having to walk around
in it? Good way to melt off any body fat though! LOL

Why Marvel characters suffered so much and changed so much back then was a
phenomenal mystery to my brothers and myself.

For the life of us we could not figure it out, especially in that the Hanna
Barbera FF cartoon was virtually untouched, aside from some re-editings to
remove Namor from about two episodes due to the character possibly appearing
elsewhere, I believe, much the same as was said to be the case with the Torch
not being in the seventies cartoon.

Firestar was created for Spiderman and his Amazing Friends just three years
later.

Would a female Torch (or Iceman) have been that much out of the question,
instead of Herbie?

Still, the explanation was that Herbie came about because of Star Wars and R2D2,
trying to cash in on that imagery.

Didn't work, I know that much. People fled from this FF cartoon, tho now I
wouldnt mind watching it as each animated FF version seemed to do the same
stories and it would be fun to compare them.

I remember Medusa had two turns in the seventies FF cartoon, as leader of the
Inhumans (Black Bolt was nowhere to be seen) and she was also a member of the
Frightful Four.

Blastaar used to say his name like he was selling a new product, like this Billy
Mays guy who just died.

"I am . . . BLASTAAR! I can take care of anything!!"

--- In DC_Comics_Uncensored@yahoogroups.com, Jonathan <jmrmpd@...> wrote:
>
> Whoever sold that premise, should have read the Fantastic Four, and closely.
> The Thing's condition was permanent, as were the others.
> Jonathan Michael Reiter

    ----- Original Message -----
>   From: Leonard Blunk
    And this actually sold to TV? Who at Marvel would approve such a show?
>     Okay, for someone who has no idea of the Thing's origins and place in the
Marvel Universe---it might work. But I can see True Believers the world over
tuning this one out!

Trivia.

As Superman, Batman and Aquaman had their solo animated adventures in the
sixties, also there was Justice League cartoons and even the Teen Titans
(meaning Wonder Girl made it into animation before Wonder Woman), when the
decision came about to make the Superfriends cartoon in '72, of course the
female member had to be added, Wonder Woman.

What I never knew and have since been told is that Wonder Woman made her
animated debut not in the Superfriends cartoon, but in, of all places, the Brady
Kids cartoon!!!

I watched this cartoon over 35 years ago. I can tell you right now I do not
recall her appearance, but then I really don't recall much else about the
cartoon anyway.

I've also been told Lone Ranger appeared in this cartoon as well.

Thanks Richard! For all the info!
  Michael Chiklis starred in the Shield during this time. He was a cop who
continually did things his way instead of by the book. So he was a natural to
play Ben.
  Yes, about the movie. If I recall, the FF's powers where changed around, Torch
became Thinglike while Ben lost the orange bricks look and gained the power to
flame on.
  That information about Ted Cassidy was a mind blower. While it was on, Lurch
was one of the most popular members on the Addams Family. He also played, Thing-
the hand which came out of the box with their mail each week.
  That Three Stooges movie was great! It was great learning all that behind the
scenes information about how the Stooges evolved into the group we all know.
  A young Lucille Ball can be seen in some of their earlier films.
                                      DR. ORIENT ROHMER 
 

--- On Wed, 7/1/09, Richard J. <richard.fuller1@...> wrote:


From: Richard J. <richard.fuller1@...>
Subject: [DCU] Re: Thing/Herbie
To: DC_Comics_Uncensored@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday, July 1, 2009, 5:45 PM








As I said, after Herbie, even tho by then I was a pre-teen and should have been
too old for cartoons, I felt I was open to anything.

The Thing could have been in outer space, the Thing could have been underwater,
we could have had the Thing team (Captain Ben Grimm, Thingra, Dr. Thingster and
Thingie, the dog) and I wouldn't have cared.

And Michael Chiklis of some show I never watched was the Thing. Didn't he appear
pretty well into the first movie as a human?

And get transformed back briefly in the second movie?

HIs fiancee, who is Asian, wouldn't go near him when he was in the costume, he
said in an article.

I hope they are married by now.

He also played Curly Howard in the Three Stooges telemovie, who suffered the
stroke and brother Moe had to take control of his likeness and left Curly
sobbing in the wheelchair.

Worth noting, the voice of the Thing in the first FF cartoon in '68 was the same
voice behind Boris Badenov and the Burgermeister Meisterburger from Santa Claus
is Coming To Town, Paul Frees was his name I believe.

Didnt know this, but the Thing with Herbie the robot in the '78 cartoon was Ted
Cassidy, aka Lurch from the Addams Family.

Also worth noting, Ted Cassidy is the narrator heard at the beginning of the
Bixby-Ferrigno Hulk show AND he provided the monster's growls in the show.

He also did the growls for Godzilla in the late seventies Saturday morning
Godzilla cartoon, with Godzookie, about one of the last things he did.

--- In DC_Comics_Uncensore d@yahoogroups. com, Leonard Blunk <lionineone@ ...>
wrote:
>
> And this actually sold to TV? Who at Marvel would approve such a show?
>   Okay, for someone who has no idea of the Thing's origins and place in the
Marvel Universe---it might work. But I can see True Believers the world over
tuning this one out!
>   Even the Bixby/Ferringo HULK was better than that.
>   The actor I felt for was the guy who played the Thing in the FF films. Can
you imagine wearing that outfit under kleg lights and just having to walk around
in it? Good way to melt off any body fat though! LOL



















[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

In a message dated 6/24/2009 10:14:48 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
richard.fuller1@... writes:


> Did anyone like the DC Challenge from over twenty years ago?
>

I did and thought it was an interesting concept. would like to c more of
that. I think it would be neat for DC to have the same concept except that the
readers send in where they think the story should go next and choose the
best idea(s).


**************
It's raining cats and dogs -- Come to PawNation, a
place where pets rule! (http://www.pawnation.com/?ncid=emlcntnew00000008)


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

In a message dated 6/24/2009 10:14:56 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
richard.fuller1@... writes:


> As you said, unless we tell each other, we don't know race, age, sex of
> each other.
>
> Generally I've encountered age discrimination online more than anything. I
> tell my age and the person I'm talking to is a teen ager and they all but
> run away screaming.
>
> "Youre an old man!!!!"
>
> Funny about the child molester. How would we know there?
>
> I like telling people at work that I've worked with four people over the
> course of a year; a lesbian just out of prison, a holy roller who liked to
> worship and sing gospel songs while he worked, a wife beater and the last
> fellow, a young guy.
>
> I got along with all of them except for the last guy, about the most
> 'normal' of the bunch. Couldn't stand him.
>
> --- In DC_Comics_Uncensored@yahoogroups.com, "Larry Talbot" <
> lonchaneyjr@...> wrote:
> >
> > OK, yes, it is unfair for anybody to have to hide who and what they are.
> On the other hand, there is no need to flaunt it either. That goes for
> white heteroes as well as anybody else. As I am typing this, none of you can
> really be sure if I am black, white, Asian, gay, Bi, straight, male, female
> or even hermaphroditic. And what's more, is that nobody cares. I am a
> person voicing an opinion that you may approve or disapprove of. My words are
> taken at face value. Frankly, that should be the case with everybody. I have
> male and female friends, friends who are gay and straight, friends who are
> Asian, black, white, etc. No hermaphrodites, as far as I know. I have no
> interest in what my friends do in the bedroom unless they plan on doing it
> with me. Otherwise, I'll pass. Be what you are and to hell with what anybody
> else thinks (unless its a child molester or something equally as bad, then
> shoot the sumitch.)
>
>
>
>

Interesting about the age discrimination. Go to an online dating site and
most of the young women list the desired ages of a man as 21-40. Yet in
talking to young women 20-30 years of age, I have been told they preferred older
men. I am not trolling myself, just find it interesting. When I ask why
older men were preferred, I have been told more than once that it was maturity
and that older men seemed to be more considerate. I do wonder if financial
stability might be a part of it, as an older man is, or should be stable both
finanacially and career-wise. I wonder tho, if that's true, why the
discrimination online? I wonder if it is fear ? Fear that the man might be an
old-fogie, or a pervert? Myself, I ride a motorcycle, listen to rock and roll,
and
I mean loud and hard, and love to travel. I am also conservative in the
area of sex, believing it should be within the bounds of marraige. I love comic
books, fantasy, and science-fiction. All the above is usually considered a
young person's activities, so I guess I am a big, old, overgrown
teenager!LOL!


**************
It's raining cats and dogs -- Come to PawNation, a place
where pets rule! (http://www.pawnation.com/?ncid=emlcntnew00000008)


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

She was in Three Little Pigskins, which I think I thought was her, then
concluded it must not be.

She did appear in a Marx Bros. movie, tho again, she was only the female object
of affection or something.

Its known that at this time, no one knew what she was capable of comedically.

--- In DC_Comics_Uncensored@yahoogroups.com, Leonard Blunk <lionineone@...>
wrote:
    That Three Stooges movie was great! It was great learning all that behind the
scenes information about how the Stooges evolved into the group we all know.
>   A young Lucille Ball can be seen in some of their earlier films.
>                                      

I ordered the complete set, havent had a chance to read it yet, just got it
yesterday.

--- In DC_Comics_Uncensored@yahoogroups.com, LSW092752@... wrote:
>
> In a message dated 6/24/2009 10:14:48 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
> richard.fuller1@... writes:
>
>
> > Did anyone like the DC Challenge from over twenty years ago?
> >
>
> I did and thought it was an interesting concept. would like to c more of
> that. I think it would be neat for DC to have the same concept except that the
> readers send in where they think the story should go next and choose the
> best idea(s).
>
>
> **************
> It's raining cats and dogs -- Come to PawNation, a
> place where pets rule! (http://www.pawnation.com/?ncid=emlcntnew00000008)
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

I have two Batman number 445 one is perfect the other is not.  On the cover
Batmans cape is maroon. The colors thru the entire cover are off,  Batman under
the DC logo is purple,  I cant find any info on it if anyone has any suggestions
i would really appriciate it so much thanks-Keafer

I think this is a comic from the era when DC comics was cutting back on yellow
ink in the printing.  A lot of colors were off because of it.  This is when the
checkerboard pink was used to simulate skin color.  Also, there is the
possibility of over-exposure to sunlight.

Der Wolf

Ululo Ergo Sum

"English is the result of Norman Men-at-Arms making dates with Saxon Barmaids."

H. Beam Piper


   ----- Original Message -----
   From: bkeafer
   To: DC_Comics_Uncensored@yahoogroups.com
   Sent: Friday, July 03, 2009 1:17 PM
   Subject: [DCU] need answers please





   I have two Batman number 445 one is perfect the other is not. On the cover
Batmans cape is maroon. The colors thru the entire cover are off, Batman under
the DC logo is purple, I cant find any info on it if anyone has any suggestions
i would really appriciate it so much thanks-Keafer





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

its not that the cover on one is correct the other is differant not from the sun
its a printing error here are the pics thank you




________________________________
From: Larry Talbot <lonchaneyjr@...>
To: DC_Comics_Uncensored@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, July 3, 2009 12:43:20 PM
Subject: Re: [DCU] need answers please





I think this is a comic from the era when DC comics was cutting back on yellow
ink in the printing. A lot of colors were off because of it. This is when the
checkerboard pink was used to simulate skin color. Also, there is the
possibility of over-exposure to sunlight.

Der Wolf

Ululo Ergo Sum

"English is the result of Norman Men-at-Arms making dates with Saxon Barmaids."

H. Beam Piper

----- Original Message -----
From: bkeafer
To: DC_Comics_Uncensore d@yahoogroups. com
Sent: Friday, July 03, 2009 1:17 PM
Subject: [DCU] need answers please

I have two Batman number 445 one is perfect the other is not. On the cover
Batmans cape is maroon. The colors thru the entire cover are off, Batman under
the DC logo is purple, I cant find any info on it if anyone has any suggestions
i would really appriciate it so much thanks-Keafer

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Britany, the pix didn't go through...
How about posting them to the files or photos, with the name of the folder
they're in?
Jonathan Michael Reiter
jmr

the pic is up under Batman #445 thanks




________________________________
From: Jonathan Michael Reiter <jmrmpd@...>
To: DC_Comics_Uncensored@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, July 3, 2009 3:42:48 PM
Subject: [DCU] Britany, -





Britany, the pix didn't go through...
How about posting them to the files or photos, with the name of the folder
they're in?
Jonathan Michael Reiter
jmr







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Now that is weird.  Bat's cape and the building behind him are the reverse
colors from the other cover.  The Hammer/cycle logo is the negative of the other
cover as well.  I think you have a rare misprint with the color scheme.  The
colors of the whole cover are screwy.  This is definitely not sun damage...it
came from the printer like that.  Hang on to it!

Der Wolf

Ululo Ergo Sum

"English is the result of Norman Men-at-Arms making dates with Saxon Barmaids."

H. Beam Piper


   ----- Original Message -----
   From: Brittney Keafer
   To: DC_Comics_Uncensored@yahoogroups.com
   Sent: Friday, July 03, 2009 6:48 PM
   Subject: Re: [DCU] Britany, -





   the pic is up under Batman #445 thanks

   ________________________________
   From: Jonathan Michael Reiter <jmrmpd@...>
   To: DC_Comics_Uncensored@yahoogroups.com
   Sent: Friday, July 3, 2009 3:42:48 PM
   Subject: [DCU] Britany, -

   Britany, the pix didn't go through...
   How about posting them to the files or photos, with the name of the folder
they're in?
   Jonathan Michael Reiter
   jmr

   [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Thank you we knew it was out of print but we cant find any info on it and are
trying to find out how to price it any thoughts???????????????




________________________________
From: Larry Talbot <lonchaneyjr@...>
To: DC_Comics_Uncensored@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, July 3, 2009 7:46:02 PM
Subject: Re: [DCU] Britany, -





Now that is weird. Bat's cape and the building behind him are the reverse colors
from the other cover. The Hammer/cycle logo is the negative of the other cover
as well. I think you have a rare misprint with the color scheme. The colors of
the whole cover are screwy. This is definitely not sun damage...it came from the
printer like that. Hang on to it!

Der Wolf

Ululo Ergo Sum

"English is the result of Norman Men-at-Arms making dates with Saxon Barmaids."

H. Beam Piper

----- Original Message -----
From: Brittney Keafer
To: DC_Comics_Uncensore d@yahoogroups. com
Sent: Friday, July 03, 2009 6:48 PM
Subject: Re: [DCU] Britany, -

the pic is up under Batman #445 thanks

____________ _________ _________ __
From: Jonathan Michael Reiter <jmrmpd@sasktel. net>
To: DC_Comics_Uncensore d@yahoogroups. com
Sent: Friday, July 3, 2009 3:42:48 PM
Subject: [DCU] Britany, -

Britany, the pix didn't go through...
How about posting them to the files or photos, with the name of the folder
they're in?
Jonathan Michael Reiter
jmr

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

I second that!
Did you hear us, Britany?
Jonathan Michael Reiter
jmr
   ----- Original Message -----
   From: Larry Talbot
   To: DC_Comics_Uncensored@yahoogroups.com
   Sent: Friday, July 03, 2009 6:46 PM
   Subject: Re: [DCU] Britany, -





   Now that is weird. Bat's cape and the building behind him are the reverse
colors from the other cover. The Hammer/cycle logo is the negative of the other
cover as well. I think you have a rare misprint with the color scheme. The
colors of the whole cover are screwy. This is definitely not sun damage...it
came from the printer like that. Hang on to it!

   Der Wolf

   Ululo Ergo Sum

   "English is the result of Norman Men-at-Arms making dates with Saxon
Barmaids."

   H. Beam Piper

   ----- Original Message -----
   From: Brittney Keafer
   To: DC_Comics_Uncensored@yahoogroups.com
   Sent: Friday, July 03, 2009 6:48 PM
   Subject: Re: [DCU] Britany, -

   the pic is up under Batman #445 thanks

   ________________________________
   From: Jonathan Michael Reiter <jmrmpd@...>
   To: DC_Comics_Uncensored@yahoogroups.com
   Sent: Friday, July 3, 2009 3:42:48 PM
   Subject: [DCU] Britany, -

   Britany, the pix didn't go through...
   How about posting them to the files or photos, with the name of the folder
they're in?
   Jonathan Michael Reiter
   jmr

   [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

   [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Well, as with any collectable, it is only worth what somebody is willing to pay
for it.  I would look at the comics guide, check the price on the regular print,
then maybe take it to a comic convention and see if anybody takes an interest. 
See if anybody makes an offer.

Der Wolf

Ululo Ergo Sum

"English is the result of Norman Men-at-Arms making dates with Saxon Barmaids."

H. Beam Piper


   ----- Original Message -----
   From: Brittney Keafer
   To: DC_Comics_Uncensored@yahoogroups.com
   Sent: Friday, July 03, 2009 9:48 PM
   Subject: Re: [DCU] Britany, -





   Thank you we knew it was out of print but we cant find any info on it and are
trying to find out how to price it any thoughts???????????????

   ________________________________
   From: Larry Talbot <lonchaneyjr@...>
   To: DC_Comics_Uncensored@yahoogroups.com
   Sent: Friday, July 3, 2009 7:46:02 PM
   Subject: Re: [DCU] Britany, -

   Now that is weird. Bat's cape and the building behind him are the reverse
colors from the other cover. The Hammer/cycle logo is the negative of the other
cover as well. I think you have a rare misprint with the color scheme. The
colors of the whole cover are screwy. This is definitely not sun damage...it
came from the printer like that. Hang on to it!

   Der Wolf

   Ululo Ergo Sum

   "English is the result of Norman Men-at-Arms making dates with Saxon
Barmaids."

   H. Beam Piper

   ----- Original Message -----
   From: Brittney Keafer
   To: DC_Comics_Uncensore d@yahoogroups. com
   Sent: Friday, July 03, 2009 6:48 PM
   Subject: Re: [DCU] Britany, -

   the pic is up under Batman #445 thanks

   ____________ _________ _________ __
   From: Jonathan Michael Reiter <jmrmpd@sasktel. net>
   To: DC_Comics_Uncensore d@yahoogroups. com
   Sent: Friday, July 3, 2009 3:42:48 PM
   Subject: [DCU] Britany, -

   Britany, the pix didn't go through...
   How about posting them to the files or photos, with the name of the folder
they're in?
   Jonathan Michael Reiter
   jmr

   [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

   [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

   [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Thanks!!!




________________________________
From: Jonathan <jmrmpd@...>
To: DC_Comics_Uncensored@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, July 4, 2009 10:57:37 AM
Subject: Re: [DCU] Britany, -





I second that!
Did you hear us, Britany?
Jonathan Michael Reiter
jmr
----- Original Message -----
From: Larry Talbot
To: DC_Comics_Uncensore d@yahoogroups. com
Sent: Friday, July 03, 2009 6:46 PM
Subject: Re: [DCU] Britany, -

Now that is weird. Bat's cape and the building behind him are the reverse colors
from the other cover. The Hammer/cycle logo is the negative of the other cover
as well. I think you have a rare misprint with the color scheme. The colors of
the whole cover are screwy. This is definitely not sun damage...it came from the
printer like that. Hang on to it!

Der Wolf

Ululo Ergo Sum

"English is the result of Norman Men-at-Arms making dates with Saxon Barmaids."

H. Beam Piper

----- Original Message -----
From: Brittney Keafer
To: DC_Comics_Uncensore d@yahoogroups. com
Sent: Friday, July 03, 2009 6:48 PM
Subject: Re: [DCU] Britany, -

the pic is up under Batman #445 thanks

____________ _________ _________ __
From: Jonathan Michael Reiter <jmrmpd@sasktel. net>
To: DC_Comics_Uncensore d@yahoogroups. com
Sent: Friday, July 3, 2009 3:42:48 PM
Subject: [DCU] Britany, -

Britany, the pix didn't go through...
How about posting them to the files or photos, with the name of the folder
they're in?
Jonathan Michael Reiter
jmr

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Here are the latest results to a survey asking fans about their favorite teams:

Avengers
X-Men
JLA
JSA
Fantastic Four
Defenders
Legion of Superheroes

Are there any teams that members think should be on this list that are not?

Green Lanterns Corp
Heroes of Lalor
Squadron Supreme
Challengers of the Unknown
Blackhawks
Justice Machine

Thanks,
Darci


--- On Sat, 7/4/09, Ron <ronbear91@...> wrote:

From: Ron <ronbear91@...>
Subject: [DCU] Latest Survey Results- Most Popular Teams (please comment)
To: DC_Comics_Uncensored@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, July 4, 2009, 9:59 PM

















       Here are the latest results to a survey asking fans about their favorite
teams:



Avengers

X-Men

JLA

JSA

Fantastic Four

Defenders

Legion of Superheroes



Are there any teams that members think should be on this list that are not?































[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Inferior Five, even if they haven't had a title of their own in
decades.  Same for the Thunder Agents.
David McMahon



Ron wrote:
>
>
> Here are the latest results to a survey asking fans about their
> favorite teams:
>
> Avengers
> X-Men
> JLA
> JSA
> Fantastic Four
> Defenders
> Legion of Superheroes
>
> Are there any teams that members think should be on this list that are
> not?
>
>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

The Guardians of the Galaxy.
                      DR. ORIENT ROHMER

--- On Sat, 7/4/09, David McMahon <dmcmahon@...> wrote:


From: David McMahon <dmcmahon@...>
Subject: Re: [DCU] Latest Survey Results- Most Popular Teams (please comment)
To: DC_Comics_Uncensored@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, July 4, 2009, 8:27 PM








Inferior Five, even if they haven't had a title of their own in
decades. Same for the Thunder Agents.
David McMahon

Ron wrote:
>
>
> Here are the latest results to a survey asking fans about their
> favorite teams:
>
> Avengers
> X-Men
> JLA
> JSA
> Fantastic Four
> Defenders
> Legion of Superheroes
>
> Are there any teams that members think should be on this list that are
> not?
>
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



















[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Truthfully, which incantation of Avengers, Xmen, JLA, JSA, Defenders and Legion
are we talking about here, cuz you could ask what is your favorite versions of
these teams?

If it were the Dr. Strange, Valkyrie, Hulk, Nighthawk version of the Defenders,
I would be truly surprised, as, while that is MY favorite, it hasn't been around
for near thirty years now.

--- In DC_Comics_Uncensored@yahoogroups.com, "Ron" <ronbear91@...> wrote:
>
> Here are the latest results to a survey asking fans about their favorite
teams:
>
> Avengers
> X-Men
> JLA
> JSA
> Fantastic Four
> Defenders
> Legion of Superheroes
>
> Are there any teams that members think should be on this list that are not?
>

The Starjammers?

The IMperial Guard?

It seems we are just naming off teams here with some of these responses.

--- In DC_Comics_Uncensored@yahoogroups.com, Leonard Blunk <lionineone@...>
wrote:
>
> The Guardians of the Galaxy.
>                       DR. ORIENT ROHMER
>
> --- On Sat, 7/4/09, David McMahon <dmcmahon@...> wrote:
>
>
> From: David McMahon <dmcmahon@...>
> Subject: Re: [DCU] Latest Survey Results- Most Popular Teams (please comment)
> To: DC_Comics_Uncensored@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Saturday, July 4, 2009, 8:27 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Inferior Five, even if they haven't had a title of their own in
> decades. Same for the Thunder Agents.
> David McMahon
>
> Ron wrote:
> >
> >
> > Here are the latest results to a survey asking fans about their
> > favorite teams:
> >
> > Avengers
> > X-Men
> > JLA
> > JSA
> > Fantastic Four
> > Defenders
> > Legion of Superheroes
> >
> > Are there any teams that members think should be on this list that are
> > not?
> >
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

Challengers of the Unknown
The Doom Patrol
The Micronauts
The Legion of Substitute Heroes
The Mighty Crusaders
 
                      DR. ORIENT ROHMER

--- On Sun, 7/5/09, Richard J. <richard.fuller1@...> wrote:


From: Richard J. <richard.fuller1@...>
Subject: Re: [DCU] Latest Survey Results- Most Popular Teams (please comment)
To: DC_Comics_Uncensored@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sunday, July 5, 2009, 11:16 AM








The Starjammers?

The IMperial Guard?

It seems we are just naming off teams here with some of these responses.

--- In DC_Comics_Uncensore d@yahoogroups. com, Leonard Blunk <lionineone@ ...>
wrote:
>
> The Guardians of the Galaxy.
>                       DR. ORIENT ROHMER
>
> --- On Sat, 7/4/09, David McMahon <dmcmahon@.. .> wrote:
>
>
> From: David McMahon <dmcmahon@.. .>
> Subject: Re: [DCU] Latest Survey Results- Most Popular Teams (please comment)
> To: DC_Comics_Uncensore d@yahoogroups. com
> Date: Saturday, July 4, 2009, 8:27 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Inferior Five, even if they haven't had a title of their own in
> decades. Same for the Thunder Agents.
> David McMahon
>
> Ron wrote:
> >
> >
> > Here are the latest results to a survey asking fans about their
> > favorite teams:
> >
> > Avengers
> > X-Men
> > JLA
> > JSA
> > Fantastic Four
> > Defenders
> > Legion of Superheroes
> >
> > Are there any teams that members think should be on this list that are
> > not?
> >
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>



















[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

The Secret Six
Batman and the Outsiders
The Watchmen
League of Extraordinary Gentlemen