IAFC MEMBER ALERT
Contact: IAFC Government Relations Department
703-293-0911 • www.iafc.org/gr

The IAFC Cites Inaccuracy in Firehouse.com Article on FIRE Grants,
Requests Immediate Correction

Fairfax, Va., July 9, 2009... This morning, Firehouse.com released an article that erroneously indicated that the IAFC supports raising the FIRE grant program’s local match for smaller departments.  The IAFC does not support raising the match for jurisdictions serving smaller populations.

According to the current statute, fire departments with a population of greater than 50,000 have to meet a 20 percent match.  A jurisdiction with 20,000 to 50,000 residents has to meet a 10 percent match, and a jurisdiction with 20,000 or fewer residents only has to meet a 5 percent match. 

The IAFC joined with the IAFF, CFSI and NFPA in support of a proposal to reduce the match for communities of greater than 50,000 from 20 percent to 15 percent.  The IAFC does not support increasing the match for the smaller jurisdictions, and has made that clear in both its testimony before the House Science and Technology Committee and in meetings on Capitol Hill.

The IAFC also has recommended that Congress create a waiver for jurisdictions that cannot meet these local match requirements.  To quote Chief Johnson during yesterday’s hearing before the House Science and Technology Committee, “According to the existing statute, most jurisdictions must meet a 20 percent match, while jurisdictions serving smaller populations must meet matches as low as 5 percent.  Some jurisdictions cannot meet these requirements due to the economic downturn, but still need training or need to replace antiquated equipment.  The IAFC recommends that Congress create the authority for DHS to waive the local match requirement for these needy departments.”

To read Chief Johnson’s written testimony, please go to Grants Testimony.

The IAFC has asked that Firehouse.com correct its story, and Chief Johnson will talk with the Firehouse.com reporter tomorrow morning to make sure that the IAFC position is accurately understood.