Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
CriticalRationalism · Critical Rationalism
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want to share photos of your group with the world? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 3433 - 3462 of 13504   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
3433
Popper's ideas arounse strong reactions. Some people love them, some hate them and many ignore them. I am writing a piece for a lay audiece, focussed on three...
Rafe Champion
rchamp@...
Send Email
Feb 1, 2003
12:36 pm
3434
I would like to draw attention to a challenging paper from the Vienna conference which is in the Rathouse forum. "Popper, Laws, and the Exclusion of Biology"...
Rafe Champion
rchamp@...
Send Email
Feb 1, 2003
10:50 pm
3435
... I used to be highly impressed but am more wary. ... I suspect Popper might. ... Yes, but then *in that respect* they were not hard to follow; they induced ...
Donal McEvoy
donalmcevoyuk
Offline Send Email
Feb 2, 2003
2:44 pm
3436
... What is "unproven" is its implications or upshot is as regards the validity of Popper's philosophy: Putnam, unlike Ken, seems to have thought the answer ...
Donal McEvoy
donalmcevoyuk
Offline Send Email
Feb 2, 2003
2:46 pm
3437
... hand). Neither do I, but we can still address the core issue. If we go about telling people that we say X but might mean X+A, then there is no boldness of...
Karun Philip
karunphilip2000
Offline Send Email
Feb 2, 2003
2:58 pm
3438
Thank you for your excellently written post. Comments below. ... Yes, no sketch of Popper's replies is given. ... Falsifiability as a logical notion that...
Donal McEvoy
donalmcevoyuk
Offline Send Email
Feb 2, 2003
3:35 pm
3439
... by ... I think I agree. But I think this is the gist of Popper's reply to Putnam and Lakatos: and he says scientists typically do interpret theories in the...
Donal McEvoy
donalmcevoyuk
Offline Send Email
Feb 2, 2003
3:37 pm
3440
Karun, ... hand). KP>Neither do I, but we can still address the core issue. If we go about ... 'X' doesn't mean 'X+A', and there's nothing whatever in Popper's...
Kenneth Allen Hopf
viviandarkbl...
Offline Send Email
Feb 2, 2003
3:58 pm
3441
... which ... Ken, I thought not. Yet, you once wrote that AS1 and AS2 are implied so Popper had already said the same thing that Putnam was now saying. Also,...
Karun Philip
karunphilip2000
Offline Send Email
Feb 2, 2003
4:06 pm
3442
Similarly, I can understand your point that Popper ... This is a difficult one. By saying "good point" you might just encourage lax reading habits, and this...
Donal McEvoy
donalmcevoyuk
Offline Send Email
Feb 2, 2003
4:36 pm
3443
... lax ... Donal, So are you here defending the position that we can have a blanket pre-condition that X means X+A and we don't have to cede the point? Ken...
Karun Philip
karunphilip2000
Offline Send Email
Feb 2, 2003
4:51 pm
3444
Karun, KAH>'X' doesn't mean 'X+A', and there's nothing whatever in Popper's views ... KP>Ken, ... You must have me confused with someone else. I never...
Kenneth Allen Hopf
viviandarkbl...
Offline Send Email
Feb 2, 2003
5:01 pm
3445
... suggesting ... close ... to ... definition ... that ... Ken, I thought we had established that AS1 and AS2 are different from initial conditions or initial...
Karun Philip
karunphilip2000
Offline Send Email
Feb 2, 2003
5:07 pm
3446
... Well Putnam did not ask for clarification from Popper on this point: he said Popper missed the point. This might explain Popper's contrary stand. Or are...
Donal McEvoy
donalmcevoyuk
Offline Send Email
Feb 2, 2003
5:22 pm
3447
Karun, KAH>No, I did not say that Popper "implied AS1 and AS2". You seem to be ... KP>Ken, ... Yes, but let us say rather that we agreed, not that we have...
Kenneth Allen Hopf
viviandarkbl...
Offline Send Email
Feb 2, 2003
5:24 pm
3448
Housekeeping the "in" box Apologies for turning up late for the party, I did not have time to follow the posts on this topic but it is possible that my article...
Rafe Champion
rchamp@...
Send Email
Feb 2, 2003
9:10 pm
3449
Today I checked the book by David Oldroyd which I cited in the reivew of Ian Jarvie's book. It turned out that Oldroyd had not himself picked out ten or...
Rafe Champion
rchamp@...
Send Email
Feb 3, 2003
3:28 am
3450
Dear Mr. McEvoy, I thank you for your response. You have written: "Below I point out inadequacies in Thornton's article that you might wish to consider." Thank...
budingenov <budingeno...
budingenov
Offline Send Email
Feb 3, 2003
2:57 pm
3451
There are two separate issues: Is Thornton correct in his understanding of Popper? Is Popper correct in his theory? I suggest no to the first and yes to the...
Donal McEvoy
donalmcevoyuk
Offline Send Email
Feb 3, 2003
4:43 pm
3452
By oversight I posted a mistaken second last line in this paragraph today. ... I should have obviously said, and meant to say: "This makes 'non-xA at Y' more...
Donal McEvoy
donalmcevoyuk
Offline Send Email
Feb 3, 2003
6:29 pm
3453
... and ... Now Mr. McEvoy writes: "No, it is a BS. From 'A at Y' it does not follow that it must be also an 'non-x A at Y'. But from there is a 'non-x A at Y'...
budingenov <budingeno...
budingenov
Offline Send Email
Feb 3, 2003
9:19 pm
3454
... Regarding this rather straightforward and innocent passage, I had ... Now Mr. Rafe Champion objects: "THAT IS PRECISELY WHAT HE SAID IN THE PASSAGE WHICH...
budingenov <budingeno...
budingenov
Offline Send Email
Feb 3, 2003
10:44 pm
3455
Before proceeding futher I would like to have an answer to the two questions which I asked previously. 1. What is your purpose in talking about isolated...
Rafe Champion
rchamp@...
Send Email
Feb 3, 2003
11:26 pm
3456
Mr McEvoy, Your recent gloss on Thornton's essay was most helpful, and your views have been clarified. Thank you for that. I was indeed hoping that the points...
Marcos Gutierrez
marcosgutier...
Offline Send Email
Feb 4, 2003
12:59 am
3457
Recently, I've been trying to consolidate my notes on a variety of different topics and themes. My goal is as follows: once I have enough of these notes...
Matthew Dioguardi
mattdioguardi
Offline Send Email
Feb 4, 2003
2:35 am
3458
Regarding Archives. (This is not important, but if you must know read on ...) Some people might have been surprised when I said that archives are at 65 percent...
Matthew Dioguardi
mattdioguardi
Offline Send Email
Feb 4, 2003
3:13 am
3459
I was, until recently, rather impressed by Keith Windschuttle. I had enthusiastically forwarded some of the pieces presented by Rafe on this forum to friends. ...
Daniel Barnes
estigon2001
Offline Send Email
Feb 4, 2003
10:39 am
3460
I happen to have a "new" copy of Windschuttle's book (ok, so it'a a few years old but for some reason I haven't got around to reading it yet so it still looks...
Becky Smith
beckyms
Offline Send Email
Feb 4, 2003
11:17 am
3461
Thanks Daniel, this is a timely reminder to reserve judgement on people when we only have a commentary by hostile critics in our hands. Think how Popper fares...
Rafe Champion
rchamp@...
Send Email
Feb 4, 2003
11:48 am
3462
Never mind, he does go on to discuss that point. The way the passage is presented is misleading, but I'm not sure whether it's intentional or just sloppy. It...
Becky Smith
beckyms
Offline Send Email
Feb 4, 2003
12:08 pm
Messages 3433 - 3462 of 13504   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help