Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
CriticalRationalism · Critical Rationalism
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Hear how Yahoo! Groups has changed the lives of others. Take me there.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 11318 - 11347 of 13505   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
11318
SF: If the Democrats do sweep to power Tuesday a week, what kind of victory can we expect? Here are three examples of major changes in Congressional...
Steven Frank
there_vdp
Offline Send Email
Nov 10, 2006
1:52 am
11319
There is a weekly philosophy program on the Australian national broadcaster (ABC). It is a radio show, presented by Alan Saunders who studied philosophy at the...
Rafe Champion
irishtown218
Offline Send Email
Nov 10, 2006
1:56 am
11320
Dear Rafe, Popper was absolutely right to stress how fundamental is the problem of demarcating science from non-science. Natural science has made amazing...
Nicholas Maxwell
gulliver2222000
Offline Send Email
Nov 11, 2006
7:29 am
11321
Nicholas, ... Which do you feel Popper achieved: 1. a proposal for a demarcation between an activity called science and other activities -or- 2. a proposal for...
Matthew Dioguardi
mattdioguardi
Offline Send Email
Nov 11, 2006
11:47 am
11322
Matthew and Nicholas, Please forgive my intrusion. I would like to answer Matt's question in the 'something else' bin. I think that Popper achieved explicitly...
keith sewell
scimystic
Offline Send Email
Nov 11, 2006
9:21 pm
11323
Matt, ... Surely, something else. When I was a college student, my roommate had a poster on the wall that said: Ideals are like the stars. We may never reach...
Kenneth Hopf
viviandarkbl...
Online Now Send Email
Nov 11, 2006
9:22 pm
11324
Dear Matt, As I said in my last email, Popper failed to solve the problem of demarcation. I once drew up a list of the different things one might be...
Nicholas Maxwell
gulliver2222000
Offline Send Email
Nov 11, 2006
9:32 pm
11325
Keith, I am answering a little off the cuff here, so the following should be interpreted as suggestions not dogmatic assertions. ... I agree with Ken...
Matthew Dioguardi
mattdioguardi
Offline Send Email
Nov 11, 2006
11:07 pm
11326
Nicholas, I regard the following as true: 1. People generally have aims. 2. This creates problems. 3. People propose theories to help solve these problems. 4....
Matthew Dioguardi
mattdioguardi
Offline Send Email
Nov 11, 2006
11:15 pm
11327
Matthew, 'Off the cuff' accepted. But my answers may be similar, as what I'm really looking for is some feedback to my essay. It took me a while to figure out...
keith sewell
scimystic
Offline Send Email
Nov 12, 2006
7:38 am
11328
It seems to me that the debate on demarcation has gone well past the point of diminishing returns. I think it was Bartley in his Bedford College paper of 1965...
Rafe Champion
irishtown218
Offline Send Email
Nov 12, 2006
7:46 am
11329
Keith, ... 'objective' knowledge. Properly understood, it can be seen to undermine the claim of 'truth' for any and all of our proposals. This simply is not...
Kenneth Hopf
viviandarkbl...
Online Now Send Email
Nov 12, 2006
8:48 am
11330
Matt, You may have a point when you say you are not sure you see "a lot of value in arguing about 'what is science?'". But then that was not my suggestion....
Nicholas Maxwell
gulliver2222000
Offline Send Email
Nov 12, 2006
11:07 am
11331
Nicholas, I'll answer this line by line, something I try to avoid these days. ... OK. I wasn't offering an interpretation of what you said. I was speaking in...
Matthew Dioguardi
mattdioguardi
Offline Send Email
Nov 12, 2006
3:19 pm
11332
... I agree that Popper did not advocate essentialism. I think the _Logic of Scientific Discovery_ is a great book. I've never failed to go back to it and gain...
Matthew Dioguardi
mattdioguardi
Offline Send Email
Nov 12, 2006
3:21 pm
11333
In a message dated 11/12/2006 2:46:44 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, rchamp@... writes: ...So far as getting wise about the major problems of the world...
matzaball50@...
msabrams50
Offline Send Email
Nov 12, 2006
9:18 pm
11334
Nicholas, ... So ... aside from the jargon you introduce, where in the above passage is the part that constitutes an improvement on CR? I cannot find it. ...
Kenneth Hopf
viviandarkbl...
Online Now Send Email
Nov 12, 2006
9:20 pm
11335
Kenneth Hopf <kenneth_hopf@...> wrote: Keith, ... 'objective' knowledge. Properly understood, it can be seen to undermine the claim of...
keith sewell
scimystic
Offline Send Email
Nov 12, 2006
9:20 pm
11336
Nicholas, ... So ... aside from the jargon you introduce, where in the above passage is the part that constitutes an improvement on CR? I cannot find it. ...
Kenneth Hopf
viviandarkbl...
Online Now Send Email
Nov 12, 2006
9:22 pm
11337
"K: That Popper was not a proponent of 'air tight' and 'hard and fast' was/is one of the things that I love most about him. He argued in many passages (some of...
Ottho
ottho123
Offline Send Email
Nov 12, 2006
9:23 pm
11338
Matt, Popper's Logic of Scientific Discovery fails to solve the problems of induction and demarcation. In order to solve these problems we need to adopt a...
Nicholas Maxwell
gulliver2222000
Offline Send Email
Nov 12, 2006
9:27 pm
11339
Matthew, We are both just scratching the surface. If you can find time to take the plunge then try my essay. For now, again, answers in your text: Matthew...
keith sewell
scimystic
Offline Send Email
Nov 12, 2006
9:27 pm
11340
... Bill Powers has been on my reading list for quite some time, I've just never gotten around to him yet. Given that the forum is a bit underwhelmed with...
Matthew Dioguardi
mattdioguardi
Offline Send Email
Nov 13, 2006
4:58 am
11341
... I'm not at all prepared for a discussion on this, so will not comment specifically. However, I was curious if you were aware that Popper himself avoided...
Matthew Dioguardi
mattdioguardi
Offline Send Email
Nov 13, 2006
5:47 am
11342
This debate has spread to John Quiggin's blog. John is an economist who advises his students to read Blaug (follower of Lakatos) and wrote that he has "not got...
Rafe Champion
irishtown218
Offline Send Email
Nov 13, 2006
12:39 pm
11343
Matt, Thanks for the good pointers. But yes, I have read, and was not satisfied. I have several problems with Tarskian truth and with Poppers use of it. [I am...
keith sewell
scimystic
Offline Send Email
Nov 13, 2006
1:11 pm
11344
... It was Donal. There was an exchange in the [Karl Popper] group between he and Peter. I contributed only a very little bit. It happened a bit like this: 1....
Matthew Dioguardi
mattdioguardi
Offline Send Email
Nov 13, 2006
1:21 pm
11345
... I don't see that the demarcation problem is fundamental. How does solving it lead to us solving other problems? ... I should think that disunified theories...
Alan Forrester
alan_forrester2
Offline Send Email
Nov 13, 2006
9:22 pm
11346
Dear Rafe. I musk thank you a for for the information I got threw your web site. Can you please, tell me somme thing more important about Lakatos' philosophy...
Julien NTENDO
ntenbiasj@...
Send Email
Nov 13, 2006
9:31 pm
11347
Alan, AF>I don't see that the demarcation problem is fundamental. How does solving it lead to us solving other problems? It is important if formulated as an...
Kenneth Hopf
viviandarkbl...
Online Now Send Email
Nov 14, 2006
10:17 pm
Messages 11318 - 11347 of 13505   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help